A. Field of the Invention
The invention is a guard for a curb inlet of a storm water management system. The guard of the invention is particularly suited for retrofitting of existing curb inlets to keep floating man-made debris such as bottles and cans from being swept into the curb inlet during rainfall events. Keeping the debris out of the curb inlet keeps the debris out of the storm water management system and out of the body of surface water into which the system drains.
B. Statement of the Related Art
Drop inlets frequently are used to drain storm water runoff from streets and parking lots. A drop inlet may be a ‘grate inlet,’ a ‘curb inlet,’ or a combination grate and curb inlet. A ‘grate inlet’ has a horizontal opening oriented generally parallel to the surface of the street or parking lot, with the horizontal opening covered by a grate. The grate is sufficiently strong to support the weight of a vehicle on the street or parking lot. A ‘curb’ inlet has an opening that is oriented generally normal to the surface of the street or parking lot and that is elongated in a direction generally parallel to the surface of the street or parking lot. The opening of a curb inlet usually is defined by the face of a concrete surround, which generally coincides with the face of the curb edging the street or parking lot. Curb inlets generally do not include a grate and are unobstructed. A ‘combination inlet’ has both a horizontal opening covered by a grate and a curb inlet opening that coincides with the face of the curb. The curb inlet portion of the combination inlet usually is not protected by a grate and is unobstructed.
Water entering the drop inlet through either the grate inlet or the curb inlet falls into a catch basin, from which the water enters a storm water management system and is directed to a stream or other water body. Water entering a drop inlet generally is discharged without treatment.
During a rainfall event, debris on the street or parking lot may be carried to the drop inlet by the flow of storm water. For a prior art curb inlet, the debris will be swept directly into the opening of the curb inlet and hence to the storm water management system. For a combination curb and grate inlet, debris that is adequately large is strained from the flow of storm water by the grate. If the grate becomes blinded by debris, or if the flow of water is adequately large, the water and debris flow through the unobstructed curb inlet and into the storm water management system. Any floating debris, such as bottles and cans, is carried eventually to the stream, river or other surface water into which the drop inlet drains.
The invention is a guard configured to be retrofitted to a curb inlet or to the curb inlet portion of a combination curb and grate inlet to allow water to enter the curb inlet but to prevent the entry of large floating debris, such as cans and bottles. As used in this document and in the claims, the term ‘curb inlet’ means a curb inlet and also means the curb inlet portion of a combination curb and grate inlet.
In a first embodiment, the guard features an elongated bar having a pre-determined length. The length of the elongated bar is selected to span the opening of the curb inlet in a direction generally parallel to the surface of the street or parking lot. The elongated bar features two end portions and a central portion. The two end portions feature installation holes penetrating the elongated bar. The installation holes are configured to each receive a fastener, such as a bolt or screw. The elongated bar has a bottom side and a top side. The central portion and the two end portions each has a width normal to the length of the elongated member. The width of the central portion is less than the width of the two end portions so that the elongated bar defines a relief along the bottom side of the central portion and does not define a relief at the top side of the central portion. The difference in the widths and the corresponding relief of the central portion on the bottom side are selected so that when the elongated bar is installed over an opening of a curb inlet, the central portion of the elongated bar will partially occlude the curb inlet opening to block the passage of large objects such as bottles and cans, but so that the relief will allow water to pass under the elongated bar to enter the opening of the curb inlet.
The guard of the first embodiment may be composed of a sheet material, such as sheet stainless steel. Alternatively, the guard may be composed of cast iron, steel, molded polymer, or any other suitable material. The guard may be configured to be resilient to that the guard may be moved out of the way to clean the drop inlet and catch basin.
To install the guard of the first embodiment, an installer will select a guard having an elongated bar of a suitable length to span the opening of the curb inlet. The installer will place the elongated bar in a position spanning the opening of the curb inlet and with the length of the elongated bar generally parallel to the surface of the street or parking lot at the location of the curb inlet. The installer will orient the width of the elongated bar in a generally vertical direction and along the face of the curb inlet. The guard is supported above the street or parking lot by the contact between the two end portions and the curb, street or parking lot. The correct installation height of the central portion of the elongated bar above the surface of the curb, street or parking lot is automatically selected by the relief between the bottom side of elongated bar at the central portion and two side portions. The installer is not required to measure or otherwise select the distance between the central portion of the elongated bar and the surface of the street or parking lot, easing the task of installation and reducing the possibility of installer error.
The relief to the central portion provides a pre-defined avenue for the passage of water from the surface of the street or parking lot and beneath the elongated bar. The installer will drill installation holes in the concrete of the surround or curb, as with a conventional hammer drill, corresponding to the installation holes in the first and second end portions. The installer then will attach the elongated bar over the curb inlet by passing fasteners through the installation holes in the two end portions and attaching the fasteners to the concrete surround or the curb using the installation holes.
As a second embodiment, the guard is composed of a sheet material, such as sheet stainless steel, that has a thickness that is small compared to its length and width. The central portion of the guard is rotated by a predetermined angle, for example by 90 degrees, with respect to the two end portions of the guard. Rotating the central portion causes the installed guard to present less of an occlusion of the curb inlet while still blocking the entry of large objects such as cans or bottles. Rotation of the central portion by 90 degrees also makes the guard stronger and less subject to bending in the direction normal to the face of the curb inlet. Rotation of the central portion by 90 degrees makes the guard weaker and easier to bend in the direction normal to the surface of the street or parking lot when the guard is installed. Installation of the second embodiment is the same as for the first embodiment.
As a third embodiment, the guard is adjustable for length. The central portion is divided into a first portion and an overlapping second portion. Each of the first and second portions includes an elongated slot and includes either the first end or the second end. Central portion fasteners penetrate the slot in the first portion and the slot in the second portion and allow the first portion to slide with respect to the second portion in the direction of the elongated dimension of the guard. The sliding engagement of the first and second portions and the fasteners allow the length of the guard to be selected by the user. The user can thus adjust the guard to be an appropriate length to span a curb inlet. Installation of the third embodiment is similar to that of the first embodiment, with the additional step of selecting the correct length for the guard by sliding the first portion with respect to the second portion.
As a fourth embodiment, the guard may support a curb inlet grill configured to fit the height and length of the curb inlet opening. When the guard featuring the curb inlet grill is installed, the curb inlet grill partially covers the curb inlet opening. Grill openings allow water to pass through the grill and strains smaller debris from the water. The size of debris strained from the water is determined by the size of the grill openings. Grill openings may be of any desired shape, such as square, round or triangular. The curb inlet grill is supported by the guard. The curb inlet grill may be composed of a thin perforated material, such as stainless steel sheet or plate. For installation, the curb inlet grill may be disposed between the first and second portions of the third embodiment and may be clamped between the first and second portions by the central portion fasteners.
In addition to sheet materials such as stainless steel, the guard may be composed of a cast material, such as cast iron, or a molded material, such as molded polymer. The molded polymer may be reinforced, as by glass fibers. The curb inlet grill may be integral with and incorporated into the guard. For example, where the guard is composed of a molded or cast material. Any of the embodiments, including the molded or cast embodiment and the embodiment with a rotated central portion, may be equipped with a grill to strain smaller debris. Any of the embodiments, including the molded or cast embodiments and the rotated central portion embodiment, may have a length that is user-adjustable, as by a sliding or telescoping engagement.
The guard may include brackets for mounting the guard to the inside surface of opening of the curb inlet so that the guard does not protrude beyond the face of the surround. Mounting the guard on the inside of the opening protects the guard from damage and prevents the bracket and the guard from being damaged by, say, the blade of a snow plow.
The mounting bracket 61 may be integral to the first and second ends 8, 10 or may be separate, as illustrated by
This application claim priority for U.S. provisional patent application 61/834,083 filed Jun. 12, 2013, which application is incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
232948 | Dernham | Oct 1880 | A |
374393 | Campbell | Dec 1887 | A |
459259 | Shunk | Sep 1891 | A |
468714 | Whitten | Feb 1892 | A |
505130 | Ryan | Sep 1893 | A |
506267 | Sefton | Oct 1893 | A |
642530 | Robertson | Jan 1900 | A |
672868 | Banwell | Apr 1901 | A |
693511 | Garrett et al. | Feb 1902 | A |
783556 | Van Buskirk | Feb 1905 | A |
1245903 | Gross | Nov 1917 | A |
1479651 | Clements | Jan 1924 | A |
1654246 | Egan | Dec 1927 | A |
1659364 | Kelley | Feb 1928 | A |
1711674 | Egan | May 1929 | A |
2473279 | Crocker | Jun 1949 | A |
4594157 | McGowan | Jun 1986 | A |
4610566 | Albang | Sep 1986 | A |
5037542 | Carroll | Aug 1991 | A |
5232587 | Hegemier | Aug 1993 | A |
5403474 | Emery | Apr 1995 | A |
5702595 | Mossburg, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
6015489 | Allen | Jan 2000 | A |
6017166 | Mossburg, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6402942 | Cardwell | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6972088 | Yehuda | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974540 | Fleischmann | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7128495 | Lill | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7160048 | Fattori | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7179371 | Bistline | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7549820 | Happel | Jun 2009 | B1 |
D597653 | Calkins | Aug 2009 | S |
7611304 | Lill | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7699978 | Dyer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7780372 | Fattori | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7914229 | Aubusson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7993072 | Lill | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017006 | Lopez | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8051568 | Moody | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075220 | Suljevic | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8216453 | Moody | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235624 | Lill | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8343357 | Horner | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366923 | Happel | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8522408 | Lill | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535523 | Friezner | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8657524 | Lill | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8940160 | Lill | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945375 | Friezner | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9057189 | Flury | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9428899 | Friezner | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20050051467 | Yehuda | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060285925 | Fattori | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070086856 | Lill | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080006568 | Moody | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080105603 | Hurst | May 2008 | A1 |
20090067922 | Fattori | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090114579 | Dyer | May 2009 | A1 |
20100288684 | Lopez | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110100886 | Lill | May 2011 | A1 |
20120103883 | Friezner | May 2012 | A1 |
20120292239 | Lill | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120294676 | Lill | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130011192 | Lill | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140041744 | Friezner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140097133 | Flury | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150053598 | Friezner | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Miriam Gordon and Ruth Zamist, “Municipal Best Management Practices to controlling trash and debris in stormwater urban runoff,” California Coastal Commission, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61834083 | Jun 2013 | US |