The present invention relates to wet shaving razors, and more particularly, to wet shaving razor cartridges having an elastomeric guard for facilitating stretching of skin
In general, a cartridge or blade unit of a safety razor has at least one blade with a cutting edge which is moved across the surface of the skin being shaved by means of a handle to which the cartridge is attached. Some shaving razors are provided with a spring biased cartridge that pivots relative to the handle to follow the contours of the skin during shaving. The cartridge may be mounted detachably on the handle to enable the cartridge to be replaced by a fresh cartridge when the blade sharpness has diminished to an unsatisfactory level, or it may be attached permanently to the handle with the intention that the entire razor be discarded when the blade or blades have become dulled. Razor cartridges usually include a guard which contacts the skin in front of the blade(s) and a cap for contacting the skin behind the blade(s) during shaving. The cap and guard may aid in establishing the so-called “shaving geometry”, i.e., the parameters which determine the blade orientation and position relative to the skin during shaving, which in turn have a strong influence on the shaving performance and efficacy of the razor. The cap may comprise a water leachable shaving aid to reduce drag and improve comfort. The guard may be generally rigid, for example formed integrally with a frame or platform structure which provides a support for the blades. Guards may also comprise softer elastomeric materials to improve skin stretching.
Embodiments of the present invention may achieve one or more of the following advantages. Proper hair orientation, facilitating passage of shave prep to the blades, decreased frictional drag, and increased stretching of the skin can be achieved simultaneously without sacrificing the overall stretching of the skin. In addition, it is believed the various embodiments of the present invention will provide reduced nicks, improved closeness, better tactile feel during shaving, and improved overall comfort. Other advantages and features of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and from the claims.
In one aspect, the invention features, in general a shaving cartridge with a housing, cap at a rear of the housing, one or more blades mounted to the housing in front of the cap, and a guard at a front of the housing. The guard has a top surface with a plurality of undulating rows extending parallel to the blade. The undulating rows have crests and valleys. The valleys comprise an elastomeric material and are stepped from a front of the guard to a rear of the guard.
Referring to
Referring to
The handle 200 may be molded from polymeric such as high impact polystyrene (HIPS), but other semi-rigid polymers such as polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) may also be used. The molding of the handle 200 as a one piece design (i.e., resilient integral arms 220 and 222, the body 210, and the cartridge support members 250 and 252) provides for a low cost shaving razor with an integral biasing and pivoting mechanism without the need for additional components such as springs, tongues, or cam followers, which may not operate smoothly over time. Furthermore, the cartridge 10 and cartridge support members 250 and 252 may define an open space there between for the unobstructed passage of water for improved rinsing while also providing pivoting and biasing functionality.
Referring to
The cap 24 may be a separate molded or extruded component that is mounted to the housing 12. The cap 24 may be molded or extruded from the same material as the housing 12 or may be molded or extruded from a more lubricious shaving aid composite that has one or more water-leachable shaving aid materials to provide increased comfort during shaving. The shaving aid composite may comprise a water-insoluble polymer and a skin-lubricating water-soluble polymer. Suitable water-insoluble polymers which may be used include, but are not limited to, polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, butadiene-styrene copolymer (e.g., medium and high impact polystyrene), polyacetal, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer, ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer and blends such as polypropylene/polystyrene blend, may have a high impact polystyrene (i.e., Polystyrene-butadiene), such as Mobil 4324 (Mobil Corporation).
Suitable skin lubricating water-soluble polymers may include polyethylene oxide, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyacrylamide, hydroxypropyl cellulose, polyvinyl imidazoline, and polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate. Other water-soluble polymers may include the polyethylene oxides generally known as POLYOX (available from Union Carbide Corporation) or ALKOX (available from Meisei Chemical Works, Kyota, Japan). These polyethylene oxides may have molecular weights of about 100,000 to 6 million, for example, about 300,000 to 5 million. The polyethylene oxide may comprises a blend of about 40 to 80% of polyethylene oxide having an average molecular weight of about 5 million (e.g., POLYOX COAGULANT) and about 60 to 20% of polyethylene oxide having an average molecular weight of about 300,000 (e.g., POLYOX WSR-N-750). The polyethylene oxide blend may also contain up to about 10% by weight of a low molecular weight (i.e., MW<10,000) polyethylene glycol such as PEG-100.
The shaving aid composite may also optionally include an inclusion complex of a skin-soothing agent with a cylcodextrin, low molecular weight water-soluble release enhancing agents such as polyethylene glycol (e.g., 1-10% by weight), water-swellable release enhancing agents such as cross-linked polyacrylics (e.g., 2-7% by weight), colorants, antioxidants, preservatives, microbicidal agents, beard softeners, astringents, depilatories, medicinal agents, conditioning agents, moisturizers, cooling agents, etc.
The housing 12 may have a comb guard 60 between the guard 22 and the first blade 26. The comb guard 60 may have a plurality of spaced projections 62. The projections 62 may define a plurality of open channels 64 extending transverse to the blades 26, 28, and 30. Adjacent projections 62 may be spaced apart (i.e., width of open channels 64) by a distance of about 0.10 mm, 0.20 mm, or 0.30 mm to about 0.35 mm, 0.40 mm, or 0.49 mm to facilitate the generally unobstructed passage of hair and minimize pulling and grabbing of hair during shaving. The thickness and amount of hair to be shaved may require the width of the open channels 64 to be larger or smaller depending on the application. In certain embodiments, the open channels 64 may taper inward and rearward. For example, the open channels 64 may have a width toward the guard 22 that is greater than a width toward the first blade 26. The projections 62 may have a width that is generally equivalent to the width of the open channels 64, for example, about 0.10 mm, 0.20 mm or 0.30 mm to about 0.35 mm, 0.40 mm, or 0.49 mm However, the width of the projections 62 may also be larger or smaller depending on the desired total contact area with the skin surface. A larger contact area with the surface of the skin may increase skin support and result in less discomfort. In certain embodiments, the projections 62 may be spaced apart from the guard 22 to define an elongated gap 55 extending parallel to the blades 26, 28, and 30, as shown in
The comb guard 60 may be molded from a generally rigid material to allow the housing 12 to maintain a consistent geometry during shaving and enhance the ability of the spaced apart projections 62 to lift and orient hairs. In addition, the plurality of projections 62 may set the shaving plane (i.e., a tangent line from the cap 24 to the projections 62). The spaced apart projections 62 may be of sufficient stiffness such that they generally do not bend or flex under normal shaving conditions, which may adversely influence shave geometry. In certain embodiments, the comb guard 60 may be molded from the same material as the housing 12, for example, Noryl™ (a blend of polyphenylene oxide (PPO) and polystyrene developed by General Electric Plastics, now SABIC Innovative Plastics). The comb guard 60 may be molded from other semi-rigid polymers e.g., materials having a Shore A hardness of about 50, 60 or 70 to about 90, 110, or 120. For example, high impact polystyrene (HIPS), polypropylene (PP), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC), and combinations thereof may also be used.
The guard 22 may have a plurality of undulating rows 70 (e.g., 70a, 70b, 70c) extending across the housing and generally parallel to the blades 26, 28, and 30. Each of the undulating rows 70a may have a plurality of crests 80 and valleys 90 (e.g., about 10 to about 30 crests 80 and about 10 to about 30 valleys 90). The crests 80 (e.g., crests 80a) of one of the undulating rows 70 (e.g., 70a) may be generally aligned with one or more of the crests 80 (e.g., 80b or 80c) of the other undulating rows 70 (e.g., 70b and 70c). In certain embodiments, the valleys 90 and crests 80 of at least one of the undulating rows 70 may have a pitch (e.g., the distance from the center of one crest 80 to the center of the immediate adjacent crest 80) of about 0.75 mm, 0.85 mm, or 0.95 mm to about 1.25 mm, 1.50 mm, or 2.0 mm
The guard may comprise a single unitary member comprising a single material. In certain embodiments, the guard 22 may be insert injection molded or co-injection molded to the housing 12. However, other known assembly methods may also be used such as adhesives, ultrasonic welding, or mechanical fasteners. The guard 22 (and thus the undulating rows 70) may be molded from a softer material (i.e., lower durometer hardness) than the housing 12 and/or the plurality of projections 60. For example, the guard 22 may have a Shore A hardness of about 20, 30, or 40 to about 50, 60, or 70. The guard 22 may be made from thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) or rubbers; examples may include, but are not limited to silicones, natural rubber, butyl rubber, nitrile rubber, styrene butadiene rubber, styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) TPEs, styrene ethylene butadiene styrene (SEBS) TPEs (e.g., Kraton), polyester TPEs (e.g., Hytrel), polyamide TPEs (Pebax), polyurethane TPEs, polyolefin based TPEs, and blends of any of these TPEs (e.g., polyester/SEBS blend). In certain embodiments, guard 22 may comprise Kraiburg HTC 1028/96, HTC 8802/37, HTC 8802/34, or HTC 8802/11 (KRAIBURG TPE GmbH & Co. KG of Waldkraiburg, Germany). A softer material may enhance skin stretching, as well as provide a more pleasant tactile feel against the skin of the user during shaving. A softer material may also aid in masking the less pleasant feel of the harder material of the housing 12 and/or the plurality of projections 62 against the skin of the user during shaving.
The valleys 90 may have a depth of about 0.1 mm to about 0.6 mm The depth of the valleys 90 may be consistent within one or more of the undulating rows 70 (i.e., the valleys within an undulating row all have the same depth). The height of the crests may be consistent within one of more of the undulating rows 70. The combination of the depth of the valleys 90 and elastomeric material that comprises the guard 22 (and thus the valleys 90) may allow for skin stretch to occur not only at the crests 80, but at the valleys 90 of the guard 22. The valleys 90 may also allow shave prep (e.g., that is applied to the skin prior to shaving) to pass to one or more of the blades 26, wherein typical fin guards may remove too much shave prep, thus negatively affecting shaving efficiency. Each of the undulating rows 70 may have a forward edge 92 (e.g., 92a, 92b, and 92c) to facilitate the stretching of skin by increasing drag of the guard 22 against the skin during a shaving stroke. Accordingly, the crests 80 and the valleys 90 may be stepped in a direction transverse to the blades 26, 28, and 30, with the undulating rows 70 closer to the blades 26, 28, and 30 being taller than the undulating rows at the front of the cartridge 10 (i.e., further away from the blades 26, 28, and 30). Each of the undulating rows may have a width of about 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, or 0.3 mm to about 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, or 1.3 mm (extending in a direction transverse to the blades 26, 28, and 30) from one forward edge 92 (e.g., the forward edge 92a) to the next forward edge (e.g., the forward edge 92b). The width of the undulating rows 70 (e.g., the undulating rows 70a) may be greater closer at the rear of the guard 22 (e.g., toward the first blade 26 than the width of the undulating rows 70 (e.g., the undulating row 70c) toward the front of the guard 22 (i.e., further from the blades 26, 28, and 30). The height of the forward edge 92 may be greater at the front of the guard, further from the blades 26, 28, and 30 than at the rear of the guard 22, closer to the blades 26, 28, and 30. The height of the forward edge may be about 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, or 0.3 mm to about 0.6 mm, 0.7 mm, or 0.8 mm In certain embodiments, the height of the undulating row 70a (i.e., the crest 80a) closest to the first blade 26 may about 0.1 mm or 0.2 mm to about 0.3 mm or 0.5 mm above a top surface 61 of the plurality of protrusions 60. If the first undulating row 70a is too low (e.g., below the top surface of the plurality of protrusions 60) the guard 22 may not have sufficient skin engagement. If the first undulating row 70a is too high, the guard 22 may lift skin away from the blade, thus decreasing the closeness of the shave. In addition, if the guard 22 is too high, cap 24 and the guard 22 would set the shaving plane, not cap 24 and the comb guard 60 (i.e., spaced apart projections 62). The position of the top of the guard 22 (i.e., crests 80) slightly above the comb guard 60 provides for proper skin stretching without sacrificing closeness. The valleys 90 of the guard 22 may be generally aligned with the open channels 64 between the plurality of projections 62 to facilitate the passage of shave prep to the blades 26, 28, 30.
Referring to
In certain embodiments, the cap 24 (e.g., lubricating member) may comprise a leachable shaving aid secured to the housing 12. The wings 46 and 48 may have a thickness “t1” of about 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, or 0.3 mm to about 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, or 1.0 mm The front face 40 may be positioned behind the last blade 30 and extend generally parallel to the blade edge 36. The front face 40 of the lubricating may be unsupported by the housing 12. The front face 40 of the cap 24 may extend over the housing 12 by a distance “d1”. For example, the front face 40 of the cap 24 may extend over the housing 12 by about 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, or 0.3 mm to about 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, or 1.0 mm for allowing the skin to contact the smoother and more lubricious cap 24 instead of the housing 12. The cap 24 extending over the housing 12 maximizes the width of the cap 24 without compromising the rinsing space between the last blade 36 and the housing 12. In addition, extending the front face 40 of the cap 24 beyond the housing 12 allows water improved access to the cap 24 (e.g., under the front face 40 of the cap 24), thus allowing the water leachable shaving aid of the cap 24 to absorb more water and release more lubricants. Furthermore, the front face 40 of the cap 24 is not constrained by the housing 12, which may allow for increased swelling of the cap 24 (e.g., toward the last blade). The front face 40 may have an accurate profile to facilitate the flow of skin over the cap 24 during a shaving stroke. The front face 40 may be spaced apart from the last blade 30 by a horizontal distance d2 about 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, or 0.3 mm to about 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, or 1.0 mm
In certain embodiments, the rear face 42 may overhang the housing 12 by a distance “d3” of about 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, or 0.3 mm to about 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm, or 1.0 mm The rear face 42 may provide similar benefits as previously mentioned for the front face 40. In addition, the consumer may rotate the handle and drag the rear face 42 against the skin to add lubrication (or other ingredients) to the skin without dragging the blades 26, 28, and 30 against the skin. Accordingly, the geometry of the cap 24 may not be limited by the geometry of the housing 12. The overhang of the front face 40 and the rear face 42 may provide for a larger width of the cap 24. For example, the cap 24 may have a width of about 2.0 mm, 2.5 mm, or 3 mm to about 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, or 5.0 mm In certain embodiments, the width of the cap 24 from the front face 40 to the rear face 42 may be greater than the span from the first blade edge to the last blade edge to provide increased comfort and lubrication. It is believed, without being held to theory, increasing the number of blades and thus the overall span from the first blade to the last blade may improve closeness, but may also increase irritation. Accordingly, the width of the cap 24 having a water leachable shaving aid composite should be greater than or equal to a span from the first blade edge 32 to the last blade edge 36 for increased comfort by accounting for any increase in irritation caused by the blades. In addition, the overhang of the front face 40 and/or the rear face 42 may allow for the cartridge 10 to be modular. For example, the same housing 12 may be used for a smaller cap 24 with fewer blades, or a larger with more blades.
Referring to
In certain embodiments the handle 200 may comprise a polymeric material having a hardness that is different than a polymeric material of the housing 12. For example, the housing 12 may be molded from HIPS having a durometer hardness of about 53 to about 100 (e.g., Rockwell R scale) and the handle 200 may be molded from ABS having a hardness of about 100 to about 120 (e.g., Rockwell R scale). It is believed, without being held to theory, the harder material of the handle 200 will provide improved wear properties against the cam faces of the housing. Accordingly, over long term use and repeated pivoting of the cartridge 10, the biasing forces of the handle 200 will remain constant (or even increase) and not drop off because of wear of the handle 200.
In certain embodiments, the slot 224 may define an open space. In other embodiments, the slot 224 may be filled with a material that is softer than a material comprising the handle 200. For example, the slot 224 may be filled with a material having Shore A hardness of about 20, 30, or 40 to about 50, 60, or 70. Materials may include thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) or rubbers; examples may include, but are not limited to silicones, natural rubber, butyl rubber, nitrile rubber, styrene butadiene rubber, styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) TPEs, styrene ethylene butadiene styrene (SEBS) TPEs (e.g., Kraton), polyester TPEs (e.g., Hytrel), polyamide TPEs (Pebax), polyurethane TPEs, polyolefin based TPEs, and blends of any of these TPEs (e.g., polyester/SEBS blend). In certain embodiments, the slot 224 may be filled with Kraiburg HTC 1028/96, HTC 8802/37, HTC 8802/34, or HTC 8802/11 (KRAIBURG TPE GmbH & Co. KG of Waldkraiburg, Germany). A softer material within the slot 224 may provide for improved biasing of the cartridge 10 and may decrease premature failure of the resilient integral arms 220 and 222.
Referring to
Referring to
The resilient integral arms 420 and 422 may each define a slot 424 and 425 extending generally transverse into the respective resilient integral arms 420 and 422. In certain embodiments, the slots 424 and 425 may be generally arcuate and extend inwardly around a portion of the head 450. One or more of the slots 424 and 425 may extend about 15%, 20%, or 25% to about 40%, 50%, or 60% into one of the respective resilient integral arms 420 and 422 and/or head 450. In certain embodiments, one or more of the slots 424 and 425 may extend about up to 95% into one of the respective resilient integral arms 420 and 422 and/or head 450. For example, the slots 424 and 425 may extend more into the resilient integral arms 420 and 422 if they are filled with an elastomeric material.
Referring to
In certain embodiments the handle 400 may comprise a polymeric material having a hardness that is different than a polymeric material of the housing 12. For example, the housing 12 may be molded from HIPS having a durometer hardness of about 53 to about 100 (e.g., Rockwell R scale) and the handle 400 may be molded from ABS having a hardness of about 100 to about 120 (e.g., Rockwell R scale). It is believed, without being held to theory, the harder material of the handle 400 will provide improved wear properties against the cam faces 104 and 106 of the housing 12. Accordingly, over long term use and repeated pivoting of the cartridge 10, the biasing forces of the handle 400 will remain constant (or even increase) and not drop off because of wear of the handle 400.
In certain embodiments, the slots 424 and 425 may define an open space. In other embodiments, the slots 424 and 425 may be filled with a material that is softer than a material comprising the handle 400. For example, the slots 424 and 425 may be filled with a material having Shore A hardness of about 20, 30, or 40 to about 50, 60, or 70. Materials may include thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) or rubbers; examples may include, but are not limited to silicones, natural rubber, butyl rubber, nitrile rubber, styrene butadiene rubber, styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) TPEs, styrene ethylene butadiene styrene (SEBS) TPEs (e.g., Kraton), polyester TPEs (e.g., Hytrel), polyamide TPEs (Pebax), polyurethane TPEs, polyolefin based TPEs, and blends of any of these TPEs (e.g., polyester/SEBS blend). In certain embodiments, the slots 424 and 425 may be filled with Kraiburg HTC 1028/96, HTC 8802/37, HTC 8802/34, or HTC 8802/11 (KRAIBURG TPE GmbH & Co. KG of Waldkraiburg, Germany). A softer material within the slots 424 and 425 may provide for improved biasing of the cartridge 10 and may decrease premature failure of the resilient integral arms 420 and 422.
In certain embodiments, the handle 400 may be molded from the same material as the housing 12, for example, Noryl™ (a blend of polyphenylene oxide (PPO) and polystyrene developed by General Electric Plastics, now SABIC Innovative Plastics). The handle 400 may be molded from other semi-rigid polymers having a Shore A hardness of about 50, 60 or 70 to about 90, 110, or 120. For example, high impact polystyrene (HIPS), polypropylene (PP), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC), and combinations thereof may also be used. The molding (e.g., co-injection molding) of the handle 400 as a one piece design (i.e., resilient integral arms 420 and 422, the head 450, and body 410) provides for a low cost shaving razor with an integral biasing and pivoting mechanism without the need for additional components such as springs, tongues, or cam followers. Furthermore, the cartridge 10 and resilient integral arms 420 and 422 may define an open space there between for the unobstructed passage of water for improved rinsing while also providing pivoting and biasing functionality.
It is understood that that the elongated bodies 210 and 410 for the handles 200 and 400, as previously described, may be replaced with interconnect members that have one or more slots (similar to 224, and 424 and 425) to bias the cartridge 10. The interconnect member may then be mounted to a handle. Such interconnect members are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,168,173 and 5,784,790, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm” In an effort to avoid any ambiguity, for the purposes of this disclosure, the term “about” shall be construed as meaning within general manufacturing tolerances.
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application No. 61/541,692, filed Sep. 30, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2064878 | Birrell | Dec 1936 | A |
2183554 | Evans | Dec 1939 | A |
2600880 | Karle | Jun 1952 | A |
3004337 | Schweizer | Oct 1961 | A |
3724070 | Dorion, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
4044463 | Tietjens | Aug 1977 | A |
4310968 | Buik et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4535537 | Ferraro et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4562645 | Dato et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4683096 | Ferraro | Jul 1987 | A |
4741103 | Hultman | May 1988 | A |
4845846 | Sinka | Jul 1989 | A |
4998347 | Schachter | Mar 1991 | A |
5031316 | Oldroyd | Jul 1991 | A |
5063667 | Jacobson | Nov 1991 | A |
5092042 | Miller et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5191712 | Crook et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5313705 | Rivers et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313706 | Motta et al. | May 1994 | A |
5365665 | Coffin | Nov 1994 | A |
5388332 | Oldroyd | Feb 1995 | A |
5410810 | Gillibrand | May 1995 | A |
5416973 | Brown et al. | May 1995 | A |
5475923 | Ferraro | Dec 1995 | A |
5526567 | Carson, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5590468 | Prochaska | Jan 1997 | A |
5802721 | Wain et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5953819 | Simms et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6085421 | Jorna et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6131287 | Prochaska | Oct 2000 | A |
6233829 | Oglesby et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243951 | Oldroyd | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276062 | Prochaska | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298557 | Gilder | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6516518 | Garraway et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6550141 | Rivers et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6651342 | Walker, Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675479 | Walker et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6941659 | Gilder | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7111401 | Richard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7540088 | Takeshita | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7703361 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8590162 | Park et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8726518 | Bruno | May 2014 | B2 |
20020046465 | McCool et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030159291 | Clark | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050126007 | Aviza | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050246898 | Gilder | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060277759 | Follo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070137045 | Follo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080229583 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100175265 | Bozikis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100313424 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319198 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110203113 | Wang | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120030945 | Clarke et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2334710 | Dec 1999 | CA |
0 314 266 | May 1989 | EP |
0 477 132 | Mar 1992 | EP |
2 264 888 | Sep 1993 | GB |
2 354 474 | Mar 2001 | GB |
2 413 980 | Nov 2005 | GB |
WO 9206827 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9529043 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9950034 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0037227 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 2004069496 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2010068075 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report with Written Opinion in corresponding Int'l appln. PCT/US2012/057833 dated Dec. 13, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130081274 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61541692 | Sep 2011 | US |