The present invention is directed to a guard for a power tool, a power tool, and a system composed of guard and power tool.
It is known to provide guards for power tools with rotatably driven insertion tools—angle grinders in particular—to protect an operator from injury that could occur if the insertion tool shatters and fragments are slung outward.
The present invention is directed to a guard for a power tool with a rotatably driven insertion tool, with which at least portions of the insertion tool can be covered.
According to the present invention, at least one blocking means is provided that at least prevents the insertion tool from turning around an axis of rotation. As a result, protection against contact with the insertion tool is improved and a protective function against a shattering of the insertion tool is ensured. As a result, fragments slung off of the shattered insertion tool are prevented from rotating the guard on the drive shaft so far that the fragments pose a risk to an operator. If damage occurs, the blocking of the guard rotation is independent of a tightening torque used to attach the guard.
The blocking means is preferably formed by a stop cam in a flange designed for fastening that extends substantially parallel to the axis of rotation. The guard is installed with the flange on the power tool, thereby enabling a space-saving and easy-to-handle arrangement of the rotation-prevention means. The stop cam can point inward. An arrangement with an outwardly-oriented stop cam is also possible. One skilled in the art will select an arrangement that is suitable for the power tool being used.
If the blocking means is formed by a stop cam in a clamp connected with the flange, a high degree of safety can be obtained using means that are easy to manufacture. The rotation-prevention means is not dependent on a clamping force given by a tightening torque of an attachment screw used to attach the clamp to a collar. The rotation-prevention means is effective even if the attachment screw was accidentally under-tightened. If the stop cam hits a stop, the guard is held securely in this position.
If the stop cam, in the installed state, points toward a collar, a corresponding stop can be provided on the collar of the power tool. The entire rotation-prevention means is located inside the guard.
If the blocking means is formed by an outwardly-projecting blocking lug on the guard, it can be machined—economically and easily—directly out of the sheet metal of the guard. As an option, the blocking lug can also be welded on, adhesively bonded or screwed into place. The blocking lug can also be installed as a retrofit. Preferably, the blocking lug can project outward. As an alternative, it can also point inward, in a suitable location.
If the blocking lug is located on the flange, the rotation-prevention means can be positioned in a space-saving manner.
The blocking lug can also be located on a surface extending substantially perpendicular to the axis of rotation, adjacent to an opening for a drive shaft of the insertion tool to be covered by the guard. As a result, the blocking lug advantageously does not extend into the operator's working area.
The present invention also relates to a power tool with an electric motor located in a housing, the electric motor rotatably driving the insertion tool.
According to the present invention, a rotation-prevention means is provided that at least prevents the insertion tool from being released in the direction of an operator. The guard can be limited, at the least, from rotating around an axis of rotation of the insertion tool. As a result, protection against contact with the insertion tool is improved and a protective function against a shattering of the insertion tool is ensured. As a result, fragments slung off of the shattered insertion tool are prevented from rotating the guard on the drive shaft so far that the fragments pose a risk to an operator.
If the rotation-prevention means includes a stop means that corresponds with the blocking means, rotation of the guard can be limited to a narrow angular range, or it can be prevented entirely.
If a collar includes a guide groove with a limiting groove located at an angle thereto, a clamp with a stop cam pressed through on its inside can be inserted. The guard can only be rotated within the limiting groove; this limits the angular range of the guard. The guard can be fixed in any position in the limiting groove.
If a stop that projects outward at an angle is provided on the housing, a blocking lug and/or a stop cam can hit it, and the guard can be prevented from rotating in an undesired manner.
The present invention also relates to a system composed of guard and power tool.
According to the present invention, a rotation-prevention means is provided with a blocking means on the guard side and with a corresponding stop means on the power tool side. The blocking means can be an integral part of the guard, e.g., a blocking lug or a cam, or it can be provided on a fastening device with which the guard is connected with the power tool. The guard is reliably prevented from rotating past the stop. By aligning the blocking means and stop means accordingly, an angular range within which rotation is permitted can be actively specified.
If the rotation-prevention means can be triggered by the insertion tool acting on the guard, the operator's safety can be ensured in case of maloperation. The guard can be rotated, at the most, within an angular range in which safety is still ensured. Installation of the guard in a position that is common for normal operation of the power tool is not prevented.
Particularly preferably, the power tool is designed as an angle grinder, the grinding disc of which is covered by a guard, at least in some areas. If the grinding disc shatters, the guard can no longer be driven by the fragments in the original direction of rotation so far that the operator could be struck by fragments. The rotation-prevention means is independent of a tightening torque used to attach the guard to a collar.
Further advantages result from the description of the drawing, below. Two exemplary embodiments of the present invention are shown in the drawing. The drawing, the description and the claims contain numerous features in combination. One skilled in the art will also advantageously consider the features individually and combine them to form further reasonable combinations.
A power tool designed as a preferred angle grinder is shown in
To ensure—if insertion tool 14 shatters—that guard 16 is not rotated so far that fragments can strike the operator, a rotation-prevention means 20 is provided according to the present invention that at least limits guard 16 from rotating around an axis of rotation of insertion tool 14 and/or collar 24.
Clamp 26 is shown in greater detail in
A further exemplary embodiment of rotation-prevention means 20 is depicted in
Blocking lug 40 hits stop 42 if guard 16 rotates on collar 24 in the direction of rotation. Guard 16 can be mounted on collar 24 using a common clamp 26. Clamp 26 can also be equipped with a rotation-prevention means 20 according to the present invention, of the type described with reference to the preceding figures.
Advantageously, guard 16 can be installed such that blocking means 32, 40 are both positioned as closely adjacent to stop means 34, 42 as possible. As a result, guard 16 can be prevented from rotating on collar 24, the rotation being induced when insertion tool 14 shatters.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 48 395 | Oct 2003 | DE | national |
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/552,225 filed Oct. 6, 2005 now abandoned. The invention described and claimed hereinbelow is also described in PCT/DE 2004/001716, filed on Jul. 30, 2004 and DE 103 48 395.0, filed on Oct. 17, 2003. This German Patent Application, whose subject matter is incorporated here by reference, provides the basis for a claim of priority of invention under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5005321 | Barth et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5163252 | Garner et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
6464573 | Keller | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6949017 | Koschel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7014547 | Kleider | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7311589 | Wiker | Dec 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
978353 | Feb 2000 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100248599 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10552225 | US | |
Child | 12797663 | US |