This disclosure relates to guardrails for roads.
Guardrail terminals have three functions: anchor an end of a guardrail barrier to provide sufficient tension to redirect vehicles striking on a face of the guardrail; reduce the risk associated with end-on impacts with the terminal; and either slow impacting vehicles to a safe stop or allow them to penetrate behind the guardrail in a controlled manner. A corrugated guardrail, which includes a W-beam guardrail, is a membrane barrier system that relies on tension in a rail element to capture vehicles striking the face of the barrier. If the guardrail terminal does not provide an adequate anchor that can carry tension in the guardrail during an impact, the barrier system cannot fulfill its primary function of steering cars away from roadside hazards. Impact with the guardrail terminal can produce high deceleration rates, vehicle rollover, and penetration or intrusion into the occupant compartment. All these behaviors can produce fatalities or serious injuries. Accordingly, reducing the risk of and, if possible, preventing such behavior is preferred. Unfortunately, the roadside safety community has to date failed to appreciate the inherent risk of allowing a vehicle to gate through a terminal and travel behind the guardrail at high speed.
Guardrail terminals must mitigate the risk of vehicles striking the end of the terminal. The severity of end-on impacts can be reduced by providing a controlled collapse of the railing system. In conventional controlled collapse systems, the controlled collapse technology will become unstable any time the vehicle path is not perfectly aligned with the guardrail. In such situation, conventional terminals allow vehicles to penetrate through the end of the barrier, often without dissipating significant amounts of energy. In such conventional configurations, the terminal is designed to “gate” open, and vehicles are allowed to travel behind the barrier at a high rate of speed. However, guardrails are used exclusively to protect motorists from roadside hazards, such as bridge piers, drop offs, steep embankments, or bodies of water. Hence, there is always a significant risk for vehicles traveling behind the barrier at a high rate of speed. In fact, the Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS), operated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in cooperation with the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, indicates that approximately 90 fatal crashes occur every year where striking a guardrail terminal is the first harmful event and the most harmful event was related to another off-road risk, such as those listed above. Gating through to a backside of a guardrail terminal represents approximately one third of the total number of fatal accidents associated with guardrail terminals.
The first energy absorbing guardrail terminal, the ET-2000, was introduced in the late 1980's. This terminal incorporated an impact head that fit over the end of the guardrail and, when struck by a car, the head was forced down the W-beam. As the guardrail was pushed through the impact head, it passed through a squeezer section and was flattened. The flattened guardrail was then curled out of the back of the impact head. The squeezing and curling of the guardrail dissipated large amounts of energy and thereby slowed impacting vehicles in a controlled manner. In-service performance studies of this terminal demonstrated outstanding safety performance and this terminal was adopted widely across the US and some foreign countries, including Canada and Australia. Competitors soon came to market, including the beam eating steel terminal (BEST), sequential kinking terminal (SKT), and the Flared Energy Absorbing Terminal (FLEAT). All these designs provided energy absorption using a mechanism other than flattening, but the basic concept of using an impact head to slide down the rail, deform it, and deflect it out of the vehicle's path was included in each of these designs.
Each of these energy absorbing terminals produce compression in the guardrail as the impact head is pushed forward. Unfortunately, the compression forces can become excessive and cause the guardrail to buckle. When the guardrail buckles, the energy dissipation stops immediately and a 180-degree bend in the rail often develops. This type of bend is sometimes called a “knee” and this bend or knee can penetrate into an impacting vehicle and seriously injure or kill the occupants. A knee can also deform the occupant space such that occupants are injured by large deformations of the occupant space. This behavior has been labelled “intrusion” of the occupant space.
In 1999, the concept of a tension guardrail terminal was introduced. Although no product was brought to market, a patent was obtained on a device that incorporated an impact head that forced the guardrail to the ground and allowed vehicles to pass over the guardrail. The end of the barrier was permanently attached to a ground anchor to maintain tension in the guardrail system. By maintaining tension in the guardrail, the system could prevent buckling and thereby eliminate spearing or intrusion. Also, the impact head will tend to follow along the guardrail's path, which means the vehicle will be steered back toward the roadway. The first commercial implementation of this concept, called the “Soft Stop,” was introduced almost a decade later and included a vertical compression of the W-beam as a primary energy absorber.
For tension guardrail terminals to function properly, they must maintain a strong, positive, or continuous connection with the vehicle throughout the impact. Unfortunately, the most popular tension-based guardrail terminal cannot create a strong mechanical interlock between the terminal's impact head and the front of an impacting vehicle. The most popular tension-based guardrail terminal also includes a steel tube attached to the impact head that extends under the impacting vehicle. The passing of the vertically compressed guardrail through the tube provides significant friction forces near the ground line. Impact forces are delivered near the center of gravity of the vehicle while the resistance forces from the W-beam are much closer to the ground. These two forces produce an overturning moment in the impact head which causes the tube under the vehicle to lift up and function as a spear to penetrate the oil pan, gas tank, or even the floorboard of an impacting vehicle. The head rotation also causes the impact plate to tilt backwards to produce a ramp that allows the impacting vehicle to ride up and over the terminal. Hence, Applicant appreciated that a non-gating guardrail terminal must be capable of keeping the guardrail under tension and producing a strong mechanical interlock between the end of the terminal and the front of the impacting vehicle without puncturing critical components of the vehicle.
The first tension-based energy absorbing guardrail system was introduced in late 2006. In theory, a tension-based guardrail terminal cannot cause the rail to buckle and thus should greatly reduce the risk of spearing or intrusion into the occupant space. The first tension terminal incorporated a cable that was threaded along a torturous path that produces friction to slow impacting vehicles. The cable is attached to a ground anchor to prevent buckling of the guardrail and reduce the risk of penetration or intrusion of the occupant compartment. Further, this terminal system was designed to minimize the number of vehicles that travel behind the guardrail and encounter roadside hazards. Unfortunately, the attempt to capture more vehicles involved stiffening the terminal to the point that the safety performance for head-on impacts was compromised.
More recently, a patent application for a canister guardrail was submitted to the USPTO. This design incorporates a squeezing system that flattens the guardrail and directs it into a round barrel where it is retained inside the impact head. This concept allows the terminal energy absorption rate to increase as the impact head is pushed further into the system. The downside of this impact attenuation system is that it cannot be restarted after a moderate impact. The reason this system cannot be restarted is that the entire coil of guardrail inside the impact head must rotate around the inside of the barrel for the energy management system to function. There is simply too much static friction between adjacent coils and too much inertia to resist restarting of the energy management process, once stopped. Even if the terminal head is still aligned with the guardrail, the energy management system cannot restart after even a relatively minor impact.
Additional problems that plague some existing guardrail terminals include steel bearing plates, used in most compression-based terminals, and steel posts cutting open the floor pan when impacting vehicles pass over the anchor or line posts during head-on crashes. Further, most guardrail terminals have difficulty providing adequate anchorage for vehicles striking the system on the face of the barrier near the end of the guardrail. Eliminating the need for a bearing plate and a detachable first post reduces the risk of cutting into a vehicle's floor pan.
This disclosure provides a guardrail terminal comprising a first end, a second end, an impact face, a top plate, a bottom plate, an opening, a pair of side plates, and a deflector. The first end includes an opening configured to accept a corrugated shaped guardrail. The impact face is positioned at the second end. The impact face includes a front surface facing away from the first end, a back surface facing toward the first end, and a bottom surface. The top plate extends from the first end to the impact face. The bottom plate extends from the first end toward the impact face. The opening is formed between the bottom plate and the back surface of the impact face. The pair of side plates extends from the top plate to the bottom plate on opposite sides of the top plate and the bottom plate. The deflector is attached to the top plate and to a lower location on the back surface of the impact face. The deflector extends at an angle of at least 15 degrees downwardly from the top plate toward the back surface of the impact face.
This disclosure also provides a guardrail terminal comprising a first end, a second end, a plurality of walls, an opening, a passage, and an angled deflector. The plurality of walls extends between the first end and the second end and includes a top wall and a bottom wall. The opening is formed in the first end by the plurality of walls. The passage has a vertical width formed by the plurality of walls extending from the opening to the second end. The angled deflector is attached to the top wall and extends across the vertical width of the passage.
This disclosure also provides a guardrail terminal comprising a plurality of walls, a plate, at least one side wall, and a plurality of engagement pins. The plurality of walls is configured to peripherally enclose a guardrail. The plurality of walls extends in a longitudinal direction. The plate extends in a direction transverse to the longitudinal direction and is connected to the plurality of walls. At least one side wall is connected to the plate and extends in a first direction away from the plurality of walls. The plurality of engagement pins is supported by at least one of the plate and the at least one side wall. The plurality of engagement pins extends away from the plate in the first direction.
Advantages and features of the embodiments of this disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments when viewed in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present disclosure presents embodiments of folding guardrail terminal designs that are configured to fold a guardrail beam from an unfolded state to a folded state during a collision or impact on an impact plate or face of a terminal of the guardrail. In other words, the guardrail of the present disclosure is in an unfolded state prior to a collision or impact with the guardrail terminals of the present disclosure, simplifying installation and assembly over designs that require partial or complete folding of the guardrail beam during assembly of the guardrail beam and the guardrail terminal while maintaining the advantages of predetermined folding of the guardrail beam during impact or collision. The folding guardrail terminal shows improved performance over conventional designs, decreasing the likelihood of serious injury and/or death from impact on a guardrail equipped with the presently disclosed guardrail terminals, especially such injuries and/or death that might otherwise occur due to gating through the guardrail during an impact.
The present disclosure also discloses features related to the guardrail terminal. Such features include, for example, an impact face of the guardrail terminal, support mechanisms for the guardrail and guardrail terminal, and other mechanisms associated with the guardrail and guardrail terminal.
In the context of this disclosure, the term “guardrail” and “guardrail beam” should be taken as being synonymous. The term “guardrail assembly” should be considered to be elements of a guardrail along with, for example, guardrail anchor or support posts, guardrail terminal, anchor cable, anchor cable support post, and release plate. To the extent that this disclosure may use the terms “unit,” “member,” and other such terms that may inappropriately be considered “nonce” terms, these terms should be considered to invoke, for example, guardrail, guardrail assembly, guardrail terminal, guardrail terminal assembly, anchor post, anchor cable, reverse release plate, and the like to the extent applicable in context to the description and related claims.
After deep study and analysis of existing terminal designs, Applicant came to understand that conventional designs, while they work well for their intended purpose, have certain limitations. For example, to steer an impacting vehicle, a tension-based guardrail terminal can utilize an impact head that buries itself into the front of an impacting vehicle. Because the impact head can only pull laterally on the front of the vehicle, there is a strong propensity for the vehicle to spin-out and become detached from the impact head. This propensity is magnified by the decelerating forces applied to the impact head as the guardrail is forced through it. If a terminal is to capture most vehicles striking the end of the impact head, considering the substantial variation in size, weight, center-of-gravity, etc., there must be a balance between the lateral forces that pull the front of the vehicle back toward the roadway and the deceleration forces applied to the impact head by the guardrail.
Applicant further came to understand that there is a relatively narrow range of lateral force (steering force) and longitudinal force (deceleration force) combinations that allow a guardrail terminal to safely capture most impacting vehicles. Because both lateral and longitudinal forces clearly affect the gating action of the terminal, and because these forces are relatively independent of one another as a matter of design, their combined effect becomes the critical determinant between gating and non-gating performance. Applicant conducted an extensive effort that included both a full-scale crash testing program and a non-linear finite element modeling analysis that were combined to identify the relationships between decelerations and various guardrail post designs that can be expected to prevent gating for most passenger vehicles impacting at angles of 15 degrees or less.
Turning now to
Guardrail terminal 10 also includes a deflector plate 24 attached to top plate 12 and angled between 15 and 45 degrees from the horizontal to extend downwardly from top plate 12 through an opening 26 formed in feeder chute 34 between bottom plate 14 and back surface 28 of impact face 20. Opening 26 is also bounded on each side by side plates 16 and 18. Deflector plate 24 is attached to top plate 12 by way of, for example, welding, though fasteners can also be used. Deflector plate 24 is attached to back surface 28 of impact face 20. Impact face 20 can include a plurality of side walls 36 that extend around a periphery of impact face 20 in a direction that is away from impact face in a direction opposite to back surface 28, and deflector plate 24 can extend across a lower side wall 36 and be attached, for example by way of welding, to lower side wall 36. Accordingly, deflector plate 24 extends from one side of feeder chute 34 to an opposite side of feeder chute 34. Deflector plate 24 is also attached to side walls or plates 16 and 18 of feeder chute 34 by way of, for example, welding. It should be noted that while internal welding to side walls 16 and 18 is a preferred configuration, welding can also be to external surfaces of side walls 16 and 18. Such can be accomplished by, for example, slitting side walls 16 and 18 and either welding to the exposed edge of deflector plate 24, or forming a tab on deflector plate 24 and inserting the tab into the slitting. Other techniques to weld deflector plate 24 to either an internal or external surface of side walls 16 and 18 are envisioned.
In addition, deflector plate 24 is positioned directly between feeder chute 34 and impact face or plate 20. While a small portion of deflector plate 24 may extend lower than impact face 20, such is not necessary because the flattening of the corrugated guardrail occurs prior to the flattened guardrail exiting opening 26.
Guardrail terminal 10 is positioned on an end of a guardrail, as will be discussed herein. When a vehicle collides or hits impact face 20, guardrail terminal 10 begins to slide along the guardrail, which, as indicated hereinabove, is a corrugated guardrail beam. Such beams include three folds to form a W-shape and five folds. As deflector plate 24 is forced along the guardrail, the guardrail is collapsed by deflector plate 24 into a stack to form a compressed corrugated shape. The compressed guardrail is forced along deflector plate 24 through opening 26 toward the ground below the guardrail, permitting a colliding vehicle to pass over the compressed corrugated shape.
The angles of deflector plate 24 permits adjustability of deceleration forces. The shallower the angle, in other words, as the angle approaches 15 degrees from the horizontal, lower deceleration forces are generated as compared to higher or steeper angles. Conversely, as the angle of deflector plate 24 approaches 45 degrees, deceleration forces increase.
Guardrail terminal 50 includes a flared collar 64 that is attached to downstream entrance 66. It should be noted that in the vernacular of guardrail terminals that downstream is toward and/or along the guardrail and upstream is toward impact face 20. Flared collar 64 forms an angled or conical shape to improve acceptable admittance of the guardrail into guardrail terminal 50 even if guardrail terminal 50 is pushed out of plane relative to the incoming guardrail, i.e., if guardrail terminal 50 is misaligned with an ideal position of longitudinal axis 62.
Guardrail terminals 10 and 50, and other guardrails disclosed herein, are an energy-absorbing interface between the corrugated guardrail and the impacting vehicle. Guardrail terminals may also be described as an impact head or terminal head. The guardrail terminals disclosed herein are designed to absorb energy by changing the shape of the guardrail and allowing it to exit from, for example, bottom plate 14 by way of opening 26. Deflector plate 24 is specifically designed to push the guardrail toward the ground as it comes out of the front of the impact head to prevent significant vehicle ride up. The upstream end of guardrail terminal 50 is reinforced, for example, by gussets 60, and designed to produce substantial mechanical interlock with the impacting vehicle. Such interlock is by way of sidewalls 36 in guardrail terminal 10 and by sidewalls 36 and engagement pins 56 in guardrail terminal 50. This mechanical interlock is partially dependent on engagement pins 56, which lock into the vehicle structure at impact of the vehicle with impact face 20 of guardrail terminal 50.
Flared collar 64 helps reduce gouging of the corrugated guardrail as it feeds into feeder chute 34. Guardrail terminal 50 is designed to provide an average stopping force of approximately 13-16 kip-ft/ft, where kip is one thousand pounds. Engagement pins 56 are connected to impact face 20, either directly to a front surface 21 of impact face 20, by way of side walls 36, or to both impact face 20 and to side walls 36. Engagement pins 56 are meant to be the first point of contact with the vehicle when the terminal is engaged. Engagement pins 56 protrude far enough from front surface 21 that they are capable of puncturing the steel frame of the vehicle, such as the bumper cross member, locking the guardrail terminal 50 in place while the engagement of guardrail terminal 50 with the guardrail decelerates and steers the vehicle back toward the road, helping to prevent gating crashes. Engagement pins 56 are typically welded to front surface 21 of impact face 20. However, engagement pins 56 could be supported in a bracket (not shown) that is attached or welded to impact face 20, including front surface 21 and/or side walls 36 at the front of guardrail terminal 50.
It should be noted that engagement pins 56 can be formed of hollow tubes, such as shown in
Referring to
As shown in
In contrast, guardrail splice 100 in
Applicant terms this configuration of eight fasteners 96 in the vertically staggered configuration of
This configuration of fasteners 96 provides advantages. As a first advantage, the configuration enables splice 110 to compress to a lower profile than a conventional splice 112. Any time spliced guardrails 106 and 108 are compressed vertically and fed through, for example, guardrail terminal or head 50, the lower profile of splice 110 enables splice 110 to pass through opening 26 more easily. Splice 110 reduces or prevents spikes in force associated with standard splice 112 when guardrails 92 and 94 are compressed. Splice 110 also enables opening 26 in guardrail terminal 50 to be smaller than an opening configured to pass conventional splice 112. Opening 26 must accommodate the thickest portion of rail that passes through it. If splice 110 is staggered and opening 26 is smaller, then opening 26 will become naturally stiffer than a larger opening as well. The lengths of the sides, being made of the same material and structure as used in a wider opening, would be able to endure larger forces, if necessary.
Another advantage is that distances 114 and 116 between edges of openings 104 and edges of openings 102 and 104 increases. This increased distance requires a larger force or energy to create a crack between openings 104 and/or between openings 102 and 104. Because of this increased spacing, splice 110, which is often the weakest part of the guardrail, is strengthened, and the capacity of the guardrail and guardrail terminal increases over a conventional configuration.
Referring to
As noted above, first guardrail 108 is formed of 10-gauge rail, which is about 0.135 inches thick. Conventional material is 12 gauge (0.105 inches thick). The thicker material increases barrier capacity, defined as the ability to control movement of a vehicle without rupture of the barrier that causes the release of the vehicle, and this change in thickness increases the stiffness of guardrail assembly 120. The additional stiffness enhances capturing and stopping a vehicle before it gates through, i.e., passes through, to a backside of guardrail assembly 120.
A hybrid system can include guardrail 108. Along cable 122, steel buttons 124 are swaged onto cable 122. Buttons 124 are welded to guardrail 108 at intervals along the length of guardrail 108. Additional buttons 124, including even the two swaged buttons 124 shown in
Referring to
Vehicle engagement is important for proper performance in a non-gating event. Vehicle engagement is also relevant for stopping an impacting vehicle regardless of gating or non-gating. Vehicle engagement is important for shallow-angle impacts, for example. Testing has shown that for modern vehicles a wide impact plate, while stable and suitable as a gating device, may not push deeply enough into an impacting vehicle to solidly connect the vehicle and the guardrail terminal. Accordingly, the width of the impact face, which can also be called an impact plate, can be narrowed by several inches compared to a height of the impact face. Reducing the cross-sectional area by 10-20% by reducing a width of an impact face, such as impact face 155 shown in
Anchor post 166 is a custom W8×15 wide-flange I-beam assembly. It is 6′ 6″ long and has anchor post connection 160 welded to the top of the beam. Post 166 is preferably installed such that anchor post connection 160 is flush with the ground. When properly installed, anchor post connection 160 is the only visible portion of anchor post 166. Anchor post connection 160 is designed to provide a fixed connection for cable 122 during head-on and redirecting impacts while also being able to release cable 122 on reverse impacts. Under reverse impact conditions, anchor cable 122 is designed to release either by shearing fasteners 182 or by breaking threaded rod 170. Anchor post 166 is a standard post spacing away from post 184 that supports guardrail terminal 186 (see
Referring to
Referring to
Slot 188 can also be tapered by chamfering the corners, allowing even easier disconnection. Thus, the corners of the slots, or the edges themselves, are angled up and away from the centerline of the slot. The slot allows for the bolt to evacuate and separate from the post quickly if the bolt does not pull through the guardrail slot. This configuration reduces the tendency for large impulsive loading. The taper and/or chamfer is situated such that the nut has enough surface to engage without slippage during installation. This configuration allows for a tight enough grip to apply a proper installation tension through the bolt that clamps the guardrail to the post.
Shelf bracket 194 provides a strong, stable support for guardrail terminal 186 during a collision with impact face or plate, thereby keeping guardrail 192 high enough to prevent the impacting vehicle from overriding guardrail 192. Shelf bracket 194 can be bolted to first post 184 prior to installing guardrail terminal 186, guardrail 192, and other elements, and can be used as a support during the installation process.
Guardrail post 190 spacing has been standardized at 75 inches on center. This spacing is referred to as standard post spacing. When the post spacing is reduced to 37.5 inches on center, it is referred to as “half post spacing.” Reducing the spacing between posts 190 helps minimize lateral deflection of the vehicle. Reducing spacing is a tactic used in a transition from the semi-rigid corrugated beam barrier to the rigid concrete barrier. Without such a transition, vehicles could deflect a guardrail far enough that they would collide head-on with the blunt end of the concrete. The use of half post spacings was used for the first time in the non-gating terminal of the present disclosure, which is the opposite end of the guardrail system, relative to the traditional transition usage near the concrete attachment. This configuration produces twice as many posts as a standard post spacing in the same span and could potentially lead to vehicle stability problems from the extra impulsive loads. However, in combination with the half post spacing shown in
While various embodiments of the disclosure have been shown and described, it should be understood that these embodiments are not limited thereto. The embodiments may be changed, modified, and further applied by those skilled in the art. Further, elements of embodiments can be interchanged and combined to create new embodiments. Therefore, these embodiments are not limited to the detail shown and described previously, but also include all such changes and modifications.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 63/479,140, filed on Jan. 9, 2023, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63479140 | Jan 2023 | US |