1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a guided missile having at its tip a seeker head which is covered by a protective cap releasable during the flight.
Guided missiles are provided with a seeker head at their tip responsive to the radiation of a tracked target. The seeker head usually has an imaging optical system imaging an object scene comprising the target onto a detector or a reticle. From the signals at the detector control signals are derived guiding the missile to the target. Towards the front the seeker head is covered by a curved window, the dome. The dome consists of a material which is transparent for the radiation to which the detector is responsive.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
Missiles are accelerated to very high velocities. The dome is therefore exposed to considerable mechanical and thermical stress limiting the life time of the dome and thereby of the seeker head during the flight. Therefore it is known to cover the dome at first with a protective cap. The missile is first guided close to the target by other guidance means. Then the protective cap is pyrotechnically released freeing the dome and the seeker head and the seeker head can detect the target and guide the missile to the target. It is essential that the missile is not damaged by the releasing of the protective cap or disturbed in its path.
It is an object of the invention to provide a releaseable protective cap which can be released without impairing the missile.
According to the invention this object is achieved in that the protective cap is divided along its length in at least two parts kept together by releasable connecting means and the protective cap is form-fitting connected to the airframe only in the connected state by interlocking structures of the releasing cap and the airframe of the missile.
In a first flight phase with put-on protective cap kept together by connecting means the protective cap is form-fitted held to the airframe of the missile. This is achieved without screws or the like by interlocking structures provided at the protective cap and the airframe of the missile. These structures can be for example an inwardly projecting ledge at the airframe-side edge of the protective cap interlocking with a circumferential recess in the airframe. As long as the protective cap is held together, form-fitting connection is ensured over 360°. When the connecting means are released the longitudinally divided protective cap falls apart into several segments each extending over for example 180° or 120°. Thereby the form-fitting is no longer ensured. The pressure pushes the segments in a radial direction outwards, while the interlocking structures fall apart. The segments are jettisoned to the side.
In a preferred embodiment the protective cap is cone-shaped and divided along at least two generatrices of the cone. The connecting means are preferably pyrotechnically releasable. In order to ensure safe sideways pushing of the parts of the protective cap after the release of the connecting means preferably an opening is formed in the protective cap in such a way that pressure builds up in the interior of the protective cap before the release of the connecting means. The opening can be closed by a releasable cover the cover being released shortly before the release of the connecting means. The cover can be released by pyrotechnical means.
Embodiments of the invention are described below in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In
As long as the protective cap 14 is not divided it is form-fitted connected to the protective cap and the airframe or tip 10 of the missile by the interlocking structures. As can be seen from
To support the disengagement and the jettisoning to the side, an opening 28 is provided in the range of the tip of the cone. Through this opening a pressure builds up in the space within the protective cap 14 and in front of the dome 12. This pressure acts on the two parts 20 and 22 outwardly to the side. When the connecting means 24 are separated and the protective cap 14 is divided into its two parts 20 and 22 this pressure ensures that the parts 20 and 22 are quickly pushed away to the side.
As it is shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 40 040 | Aug 2002 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2655106 | O'Brien | Oct 1953 | A |
2889772 | Howard | Jun 1959 | A |
3336872 | Langen et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3362290 | Carr et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3453960 | Qualls | Jul 1969 | A |
3524608 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3601055 | Crockett | Aug 1971 | A |
3637166 | Nicholson et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3674227 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3706281 | Hatakeyama | Dec 1972 | A |
3747530 | Tepper | Jul 1973 | A |
4245890 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4275859 | Bleday | Jun 1981 | A |
4515082 | Pizzurro | May 1985 | A |
4533094 | Geis et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4690351 | Beckerleg et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4867357 | Inglis et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5167386 | Laquer et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5325784 | Bai et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5404814 | Fisch et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5529264 | Bedegrew et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5662293 | Hower et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691736 | Hunn et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5743492 | Chan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5820077 | Sutliff et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6150974 | Tasaka et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6622971 | Robertson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6679453 | Steiner | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6854393 | Hazan | Feb 2005 | B1 |