For over a century, signals transmitted by radio waves involved radiation fields launched using conventional antenna structures. In contrast to radio science, electrical power distribution systems in the last century involved the transmission of energy guided along electrical conductors. This understanding of the distinction between radio frequency (RF) and power transmission has existed since the early 1900's.
Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
To begin, some terminology shall be established to provide clarity in the discussion of concepts to follow. First, as contemplated herein, a formal distinction is drawn between radiated electromagnetic fields and guided electromagnetic fields.
As contemplated herein, a radiated electromagnetic field comprises electromagnetic energy that is emitted from a source structure in the form of waves that are not bound to a waveguide. For example, a radiated electromagnetic field is generally a field that leaves an electric structure such as an antenna and propagates through the atmosphere or other medium and is not bound to any waveguide structure. Once radiated electromagnetic waves leave an electric structure such as an antenna, they continue to propagate in the medium of propagation (such as air) independent of their source until they dissipate regardless of whether the source continues to operate. Once electromagnetic waves are radiated, they are not recoverable unless intercepted, and, if not intercepted, the energy inherent in the radiated electromagnetic waves is lost forever. Electrical structures such as antennas are designed to radiate electromagnetic fields by maximizing the ratio of the radiation resistance to the structure loss resistance. Radiated energy spreads out in space and is lost regardless of whether a receiver is present. The energy density of the radiated fields is a function of distance due to geometric spreading. Accordingly, the term “radiate” in all its forms as used herein refers to this form of electromagnetic propagation.
A guided electromagnetic field is a propagating electromagnetic wave whose energy is concentrated within or near boundaries between media having different electromagnetic properties. In this sense, a guided electromagnetic field is one that is bound to a waveguide and may be characterized as being conveyed by the current flowing in the waveguide. If there is no load to receive and/or dissipate the energy conveyed in a guided electromagnetic wave, then no energy is lost except for that dissipated in the conductivity of the guiding medium. Stated another way, if there is no load for a guided electromagnetic wave, then no energy is consumed. Thus, a generator or other source generating a guided electromagnetic field does not deliver real power unless a resistive load is present. To this end, such a generator or other source essentially runs idle until a load is presented. This is akin to running a generator to generate a 60 Hertz electromagnetic wave that is transmitted over power lines where there is no electrical load. It should be noted that a guided electromagnetic field or wave is the equivalent to what is termed a “transmission line mode.” This contrasts with radiated electromagnetic waves in which real power is supplied at all times in order to generate radiated waves. Unlike radiated electromagnetic waves, guided electromagnetic energy does not continue to propagate along a finite length waveguide after the energy source is turned off. Accordingly, the term “guide” in all its forms as used herein refers to this transmission mode of electromagnetic propagation.
Referring now to
Of interest are the shapes of the curves 103 and 106 for guided wave and for radiation propagation, respectively. The radiated field strength curve 106 falls off geometrically (1/d, where d is distance), which is depicted as a straight line on the log-log scale. The guided field strength curve 103, on the other hand, has a characteristic exponential decay of e−ad/√{square root over (d)} and exhibits a distinctive knee 109 on the log-log scale. The guided field strength curve 103 and the radiated field strength curve 106 intersect at point 112, which occurs at a crossing distance. At distances less than the crossing distance at intersection point 112, the field strength of a guided electromagnetic field is significantly greater at most locations than the field strength of a radiated electromagnetic field. At distances greater than the crossing distance, the opposite is true. Thus, the guided and radiated field strength curves 103 and 106 further illustrate the fundamental propagation difference between guided and radiated electromagnetic fields. For an informal discussion of the difference between guided and radiated electromagnetic fields, reference is made to Milligan, T., Modern Antenna Design, McGraw-Hill, 1st Edition, 1985, pp. 8-9, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The distinction between radiated and guided electromagnetic waves, made above, is readily expressed formally and placed on a rigorous basis. That two such diverse solutions could emerge from one and the same linear partial differential equation, the wave equation, analytically follows from the boundary conditions imposed on the problem. The Green function for the wave equation, itself, contains the distinction between the nature of radiation and guided waves.
In empty space, the wave equation is a differential operator whose eigenfunctions possess a continuous spectrum of eigenvalues on the complex wave-number plane. This transverse electro-magnetic (TEM) field is called the radiation field, and those propagating fields are called “Hertzian waves.” However, in the presence of a conducting boundary, the wave equation plus boundary conditions mathematically lead to a spectral representation of wave-numbers composed of a continuous spectrum plus a sum of discrete spectra. To this end, reference is made to Sommerfeld, A., “Uber die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der Drahtlosen Telegraphie,” Annalen der Physik, Vol. 28, 1909, pp. 665-736. Also see Sommerfeld, A., “Problems of Radio,” published as Chapter 6 in Partial Differential Equations in Physics—Lectures on Theoretical Physics: Volume VI, Academic Press, 1949, pp. 236-289, 295-296; Collin, R. E., “Hertzian Dipole Radiating Over a Lossy Earth or Sea: Some Early and Late 20th Century Controversies,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 46, No. 2, April 2004, pp. 64-79; and Reich, H. J., Ordnung, P. F, Krauss, H. L., and Skalnik, J. G., Microwave Theory and Techniques, Van Nostrand, 1953, pp. 291-293, each of these references being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The terms “ground wave” and “surface wave” identify two distinctly different physical propagation phenomena. A surface wave arises analytically from a distinct pole yielding a discrete component in the plane wave spectrum. See, e.g., “The Excitation of Plane Surface Waves” by Cullen, A. L., (Proceedings of the IEE (British), Vol. 101, Part IV, August 1954, pp. 225-235). In this context, a surface wave is considered to be a guided surface wave. The surface wave (in the Zenneck-Sommerfeld guided wave sense) is, physically and mathematically, not the same as the ground wave (in the Weyl-Norton-FCC sense) that is now so familiar from radio broadcasting. These two propagation mechanisms arise from the excitation of different types of eigenvalue spectra (continuum or discrete) on the complex plane. The field strength of the guided surface wave decays exponentially with distance as illustrated by curve 103 of
To summarize the above, first, the continuous part of the wave-number eigenvalue spectrum, corresponding to branch-cut integrals, produces the radiation field, and second, the discrete spectra, and corresponding residue sum arising from the poles enclosed by the contour of integration, result in non-TEM traveling surface waves that are exponentially damped in the direction transverse to the propagation. Such surface waves are guided transmission line modes. For further explanation, reference is made to Friedman, B., Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics, Wiley, 1956, pp. pp. 214, 283-286, 290, 298-300.
In free space, antennas excite the continuum eigenvalues of the wave equation, which is a radiation field, where the outwardly propagating RF energy with Ez and Hϕ in-phase is lost forever. On the other hand, waveguide probes excite discrete eigenvalues, which results in transmission line propagation. See Collin, R. E., Field Theory of Guided Waves, McGraw-Hill, 1960, pp. 453, 474-477. While such theoretical analyses have held out the hypothetical possibility of launching open surface guided waves over planar or spherical surfaces of lossy, homogeneous media, for more than a century no known structures in the engineering arts have existed for accomplishing this with any practical efficiency. Unfortunately, since it emerged in the early 1900's, the theoretical analysis set forth above has essentially remained a theory and there have been no known structures for practically accomplishing the launching of open surface guided waves over planar or spherical surfaces of lossy, homogeneous media.
According to the various embodiments of the present disclosure, various guided surface waveguide probes are described that are configured to excite electric fields that couple into a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of a lossy conducting medium. Such guided electromagnetic fields are substantially mode-matched in magnitude and phase to a guided surface wave mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium. Such a guided surface wave mode can also be termed a Zenneck waveguide mode. By virtue of the fact that the resultant fields excited by the guided surface waveguide probes described herein are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium, a guided electromagnetic field in the form of a guided surface wave is launched along the surface of the lossy conducting medium. According to one embodiment, the lossy conducting medium comprises a terrestrial medium such as the Earth.
Referring to
According to various embodiments, the present disclosure sets forth various guided surface waveguide probes that generate electromagnetic fields that are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium comprising Region 1. According to various embodiments, such electromagnetic fields substantially synthesize a wave front incident at a complex Brewster angle of the lossy conducting medium that can result in zero reflection.
To explain further, in Region 2, where an ejωt field variation is assumed and where ρ≠0 and z≥0 (with z being the vertical coordinate normal to the surface of Region 1, and ρ being the radial dimension in cylindrical coordinates), Zenneck's closed-form exact solution of Maxwell's equations satisfying the boundary conditions along the interface are expressed by the following electric field and magnetic field components:
In Region 1, where the ejωt field variation is assumed and where ρ≠0 and z≤0, Zenneck's closed-form exact solution of Maxwell's equations satisfying the boundary conditions along the interface is expressed by the following electric field and magnetic field components:
In these expressions, z is the vertical coordinate normal to the surface of Region 1 and ρ is the radial coordinate, Hn(2)(−jγρ) is a complex argument Hankel function of the second kind and order n, u1 is the propagation constant in the positive vertical (z) direction in Region 1, u2 is the propagation constant in the vertical (z) direction in Region 2, σ1 is the conductivity of Region 1, ω is equal to 2πf, where f is a frequency of excitation, εo is the permittivity of free space, ε1 is the permittivity of Region 1, A is a source constant imposed by the source, and γ is a surface wave radial propagation constant.
The propagation constants in the ±z directions are determined by separating the wave equation above and below the interface between Regions 1 and 2, and imposing the boundary conditions. This exercise gives, in Region 2,
and gives, in Region 1,
u1=−u2(εr−jx). (8)
The radial propagation constant γ is given by
which is a complex expression where n is the complex index of refraction given by
n=√{square root over (εr−jx)}. (10)
In all of the above Equations,
where εr comprises the relative permittivity of Region 1, σ1 is the conductivity of Region 1, εo is the permittivity of free space, and μo comprises the permeability of free space. Thus, the generated surface wave propagates parallel to the interface and exponentially decays vertical to it. This is known as evanescence.
Thus, Equations (1)-(3) can be considered to be a cylindrically-symmetric, radially-propagating waveguide mode. See Barlow, H. M., and Brown, J., Radio Surface Waves, Oxford University Press, 1962, pp. 10-12, 29-33. The present disclosure details structures that excite this “open boundary” waveguide mode. Specifically, according to various embodiments, a guided surface waveguide probe is provided with a charge terminal of appropriate size that is fed with voltage and/or current and is positioned relative to the boundary interface between Region 2 and Region 1. This may be better understood with reference to
According to one embodiment, the lossy conducting medium 203 can comprise a terrestrial medium such as the planet Earth. To this end, such a terrestrial medium comprises all structures or formations included thereon whether natural or man-made. For example, such a terrestrial medium can comprise natural elements such as rock, soil, sand, fresh water, sea water, trees, vegetation, and all other natural elements that make up our planet. In addition, such a terrestrial medium can comprise man-made elements such as concrete, asphalt, building materials, and other man-made materials. In other embodiments, the lossy conducting medium 203 can comprise some medium other than the Earth, whether naturally occurring or man-made. In other embodiments, the lossy conducting medium 203 can comprise other media such as man-made surfaces and structures such as automobiles, aircraft, man-made materials (such as plywood, plastic sheeting, or other materials) or other media.
In the case where the lossy conducting medium 203 comprises a terrestrial medium or Earth, the second medium 206 can comprise the atmosphere above the ground. As such, the atmosphere can be termed an “atmospheric medium” that comprises air and other elements that make up the atmosphere of the Earth. In addition, it is possible that the second medium 206 can comprise other media relative to the lossy conducting medium 203.
The guided surface waveguide probe 200a includes a feed network 209 that couples an excitation source 212 to the charge terminal T1 via, e.g., a vertical feed line conductor. According to various embodiments, a charge Q1 is imposed on the charge terminal T1 to synthesize an electric field based upon the voltage applied to terminal T1 at any given instant. Depending on the angle of incidence (θi) of the electric field (E), it is possible to substantially mode-match the electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 comprising Region 1.
By considering the Zenneck closed-form solutions of Equations (1)-(6), the Leontovich impedance boundary condition between Region 1 and Region 2 can be stated as
{circumflex over (z)}×2(ρ,φ,0)={right arrow over (J)}S, (13)
where {circumflex over (z)} is a unit normal in the positive vertical (+z) direction and {right arrow over (H)}2 is the magnetic field strength in Region 2 expressed by Equation (1) above. Equation (13) implies that the electric and magnetic fields specified in Equations (1)-(3) may result in a radial surface current density along the boundary interface, where the radial surface current density can be specified by
Jρ(ρ′)=−AH1(2)(−jγρ′) (14)
where A is a constant. Further, it should be noted that close-in to the guided surface waveguide probe 200 (for ρ<<λ), Equation (14) above has the behavior
The negative sign means that when source current (Io) flows vertically upward as illustrated in
where q1=C1V1, in Equations (1)-(6) and (14). Therefore, the radial surface current density of Equation (14) can be restated as
The fields expressed by Equations (1)-(6) and (17) have the nature of a transmission line mode bound to a lossy interface, not radiation fields that are associated with groundwave propagation. See Barlow, H. M. and Brown, J., Radio Surface Waves, Oxford University Press, 1962, pp. 1-5.
At this point, a review of the nature of the Hankel functions used in Equations (1)-(6) and (17) is provided for these solutions of the wave equation. One might observe that the Hankel functions of the first and second kind and order n are defined as complex combinations of the standard Bessel functions of the first and second kinds
Hn(1)(x)=Jn(x)+jNn(x), and (18)
Hn(2)(x)=Jn(x)−jNn(x), (19)
These functions represent cylindrical waves propagating radially inward (Hn(1)) and outward (Hn(2)), respectively. The definition is analogous to the relationship e±jx=cos x±j sin x. See, for example, Harrington, R. F., Time-Harmonic Fields, McGraw-Hill, 1961, pp. 460-463.
That Hn(2)(kρρ) is an outgoing wave can be recognized from its large argument asymptotic behavior that is obtained directly from the series definitions of Jn(x) and Nn(x). Far-out from the guided surface waveguide probe:
which, when multiplied by ejωt, is an outward propagating cylindrical wave of the form ej(ωt−kρ) with a 1/√{square root over (ρ)} spatial variation. The first order (n=1) solution can be determined from Equation (20a) to be
Close-in to the guided surface waveguide probe (for p<<λ), the Hankel function of first order and the second kind behaves as
Note that these asymptotic expressions are complex quantities. When x is a real quantity, Equations (20b) and (21) differ in phase by √{square root over (j)}, which corresponds to an extra phase advance or “phase boost” of 45° or, equivalently, λ/8. The close-in and far-out asymptotes of the first order Hankel function of the second kind have a Hankel “crossover” or transition point where they are of equal magnitude at a distance of ρ=Rx.
Thus, beyond the Hankel crossover point the “far out” representation predominates over the “close-in” representation of the Hankel function. The distance to the Hankel crossover point (or Hankel crossover distance) can be found by equating Equations (20b) and (21) for −jγρ, and solving for Rx. With x=σ/ωεo, it can be seen that the far-out and close-in Hankel function asymptotes are frequency dependent, with the Hankel crossover point moving out as the frequency is lowered. It should also be noted that the Hankel function asymptotes may also vary as the conductivity (σ) of the lossy conducting medium changes. For example, the conductivity of the soil can vary with changes in weather conditions.
Referring to
Considering the electric field components given by Equations (2) and (3) of the Zenneck closed-form solution in Region 2, it can be seen that the ratio of Ez and Ep asymptotically passes to
where n is the complex index of refraction of Equation (10) and θi is the angle of incidence of the electric field. In addition, the vertical component of the mode-matched electric field of Equation (3) asymptotically passes to
which is linearly proportional to free charge on the isolated component of the elevated charge terminal's capacitance at the terminal voltage, qfree=Cfree×VT.
For example, the height H1 of the elevated charge terminal T1 in
The advantage of an increased capacitive elevation for the charge terminal T1 is that the charge on the elevated charge terminal T1 is further removed from the ground plane, resulting in an increased amount of free charge qfree to couple energy into the guided surface waveguide mode. As the charge terminal T1 is moved away from the ground plane, the charge distribution becomes more uniformly distributed about the surface of the terminal. The amount of free charge is related to the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T1.
For example, the capacitance of a spherical terminal can be expressed as a function of physical height above the ground plane. The capacitance of a sphere at a physical height of h above a perfect ground is given by
Celevated sphere=4πε0a(1+M+M2+M3+2M4+3M5+ . . . ), (24)
where the diameter of the sphere is 2a, and where M=a/2h with h being the height of the spherical terminal. As can be seen, an increase in the terminal height h reduces the capacitance C of the charge terminal. It can be shown that for elevations of the charge terminal T1 that are at a height of about four times the diameter (4D=8a) or greater, the charge distribution is approximately uniform about the spherical terminal, which can improve the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode.
In the case of a sufficiently isolated terminal, the self-capacitance of a conductive sphere can be approximated by C=4πεoa, where a is the radius of the sphere in meters, and the self-capacitance of a disk can be approximated by C=8εoa, where a is the radius of the disk in meters. The charge terminal T1 can include any shape such as a sphere, a disk, a cylinder, a cone, a torus, a hood, one or more rings, or any other randomized shape or combination of shapes. An equivalent spherical diameter can be determined and used for positioning of the charge terminal T1.
This may be further understood with reference to the example of
Referring next to
where θi is the conventional angle of incidence measured with respect to the surface normal.
In the example of
θi=arctan(√{square root over (εr−jx)})=θi,B, (26)
where x=σ/ωεo. This complex angle of incidence (θi,B) is referred to as the Brewster angle. Referring back to Equation (22), it can be seen that the same complex Brewster angle (θi,B) relationship is present in both Equations (22) and (26).
As illustrated in
(θi)=Eρ{circumflex over (ρ)}+Ez{circumflex over (z)}. (27)
Geometrically, the illustration in
Eρ(ρ,z)=E(ρ,z)cos θi, and (28a)
which means that the field ratio is
A generalized parameter W, called “wave tilt,” is noted herein as the ratio of the horizontal electric field component to the vertical electric field component given by
which is complex and has both magnitude and phase. For an electromagnetic wave in Region 2, the wave tilt angle (Ψ) is equal to the angle between the normal of the wave-front at the boundary interface with Region 1 and the tangent to the boundary interface. This may be easier to see in
Applying Equation (30b) to a guided surface wave gives
With the angle of incidence equal to the complex Brewster angle (θi,B), the Fresnel reflection coefficient of Equation (25) vanishes, as shown by
By adjusting the complex field ratio of Equation (22), an incident field can be synthesized to be incident at a complex angle at which the reflection is reduced or eliminated. Establishing this ratio as n=√{square root over (εr−jx)} results in the synthesized electric field being incident at the complex Brewster angle, making the reflections vanish.
The concept of an electrical effective height can provide further insight into synthesizing an electric field with a complex angle of incidence with a guided surface waveguide probe 200. The electrical effective height (heff) has been defined as
for a monopole with a physical height (or length) of hp. Since the expression depends upon the magnitude and phase of the source distribution along the structure, the effective height (or length) is complex in general. The integration of the distributed current I(z) of the structure is performed over the physical height of the structure (hp), and normalized to the ground current (I0) flowing upward through the base (or input) of the structure. The distributed current along the structure can be expressed by
I(z)=IC cos(β0z), (34)
where β0 is the propagation factor for current propagating on the structure. In the example of
For example, consider a feed network 209 that includes a low loss coil (e.g., a helical coil) at the bottom of the structure and a vertical feed line conductor connected between the coil and the charge terminal T1. The phase delay due to the coil (or helical delay line) is θc=βpIC, with a physical length of IC and a propagation factor of
where Vf is the velocity factor on the structure, λ0 is the wavelength at the supplied frequency, and λp is the propagation wavelength resulting from the velocity factor Vf. The phase delay is measured relative to the ground (stake) current I0.
In addition, the spatial phase delay along the length Iw of the vertical feed line conductor can be given by θy=βwIw where βw is the propagation phase constant for the vertical feed line conductor. In some implementations, the spatial phase delay may be approximated by θy=βwhp, since the difference between the physical height hp of the guided surface waveguide probe 200a and the vertical feed line conductor length Iw is much less than a wavelength at the supplied frequency (λ0). As a result, the total phase delay through the coil and vertical feed line conductor is Φ=θc+θy, and the current fed to the top of the coil from the bottom of the physical structure is
IC(θc+θy)=I0ejΦ, (36)
with the total phase delay Φ measured relative to the ground (stake) current I0. Consequently, the electrical effective height of a guided surface waveguide probe 200 can be approximated by
for the case where the physical height hp<<λ0. The complex effective height of a monopole, heff=hp at an angle (or phase shift) of Φ, may be adjusted to cause the source fields to match a guided surface waveguide mode and cause a guided surface wave to be launched on the lossy conducting medium 203.
In the example of
Electrically, the geometric parameters are related by the electrical effective height (heff) of the charge terminal T1 by
Rx tan ψi,B=Rx×W=heff=hpejΦ, (39)
where ψi,B=(π/2)−θi,B is the Brewster angle measured from the surface of the lossy conducting medium. To couple into the guided surface waveguide mode, the wave tilt of the electric field at the Hankel crossover distance can be expressed as the ratio of the electrical effective height and the Hankel crossover distance
Since both the physical height (hp) and the Hankel crossover distance (Rx) are real quantities, the angle (Ψ) of the desired guided surface wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (Rx) is equal to the phase (Φ) of the complex effective height (heff). This implies that by varying the phase at the supply point of the coil, and thus the phase shift in Equation (37), the phase, Φ, of the complex effective height can be manipulated to match the angle of the wave tilt, Ψ, of the guided surface waveguide mode at the Hankel crossover point 121: Φ=Ψ.
In
If the physical height of the charge terminal T1 is decreased without changing the phase shift Φ of the effective height (heff), the resulting electric field intersects the lossy conducting medium 203 at the Brewster angle at a reduced distance from the guided surface waveguide probe 200.
A guided surface waveguide probe 200 can be configured to establish an electric field having a wave tilt that corresponds to a wave illuminating the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 at a complex Brewster angle, thereby exciting radial surface currents by substantially mode-matching to a guided surface wave mode at (or beyond) the Hankel crossover point 121 at Rx.
Referring to
As shown in
In the example of
The construction and adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 is based upon various operating conditions, such as the transmission frequency, conditions of the lossy conducting medium (e.g., soil conductivity σ and relative permittivity εr), and size of the charge terminal T1. The index of refraction can be calculated from Equations (10) and (11) as
n=√{square root over (εr−jx)}, (41)
where x=σ/ωεo with ω=2πf. The conductivity a and relative permittivity εr can be determined through test measurements of the lossy conducting medium 203. The complex Brewster angle (θi,B) measured from the surface normal can also be determined from Equation (26) as
θi,B=arctan(√{square root over (εr−jx)}), (42)
or measured from the surface as shown in
The wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (WRx) can also be found using Equation (40).
The Hankel crossover distance can also be found by equating the magnitudes of Equations (20b) and (21) for −jγρ, and solving for Rx as illustrated by
heff=hpejΦ=Rx tan ψi,B. (44)
As can be seen from Equation (44), the complex effective height (heff) includes a magnitude that is associated with the physical height (hp) of the charge terminal T1 and a phase delay (Φ) that is to be associated with the angle (ΨW) of the wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (Rx). With these variables and the selected charge terminal T1 configuration, it is possible to determine the configuration of a guided surface waveguide probe 200.
With the charge terminal T1 positioned at or above the physical height (hp), the feed network 209 (
The phase delay θc of a helically-wound coil can be determined from Maxwell's equations as has been discussed by Corum, K. L. and J. F. Corum, “RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes,” Microwave Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, September 2001, pp. 36-45., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For a helical coil with H/D>1, the ratio of the velocity of propagation (v) of a wave along the coil's longitudinal axis to the speed of light (c), or the “velocity factor,” is given by
where H is the axial length of the solenoidal helix, D is the coil diameter, N is the number of turns of the coil, s=H/N is the turn-to-turn spacing (or helix pitch) of the coil, and λo is the free-space wavelength. Based upon this relationship, the electrical length, or phase delay, of the helical coil is given by
The principle is the same if the helix is wound spirally or is short and fat, but Vf and θc are easier to obtain by experimental measurement. The expression for the characteristic (wave) impedance of a helical transmission line has also been derived as
The spatial phase delay θy of the structure can be determined using the traveling wave phase delay of the vertical feed line conductor 221 (
where hw is the vertical length (or height) of the conductor and a is the radius (in mks units). As with the helical coil, the traveling wave phase delay of the vertical feed line conductor can be given by
where βw is the propagation phase constant for the vertical feed line conductor, hw is the vertical length (or height) of the vertical feed line conductor, Vw is the velocity factor on the wire, λ0 is the wavelength at the supplied frequency, and λw is the propagation wavelength resulting from the velocity factor Vw. For a uniform cylindrical conductor, the velocity factor is a constant with Vw≈0.94, or in a range from about 0.93 to about 0.98. If the mast is considered to be a uniform transmission line, its average characteristic impedance can be approximated by
where Vw≈0.94 for a uniform cylindrical conductor and a is the radius of the conductor. An alternative expression that has been employed in amateur radio literature for the characteristic impedance of a single-wire feed line can be given by
Equation (51) implies that Zw for a single-wire feeder varies with frequency. The phase delay can be determined based upon the capacitance and characteristic impedance.
With a charge terminal T1 positioned over the lossy conducting medium 203 as shown in
The coupling to the guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 can be improved and/or optimized by tuning the guided surface waveguide probe 200 for standing wave resonance with respect to a complex image plane associated with the charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1. By doing this, the performance of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 can be adjusted for increased and/or maximum voltage (and thus charge Q1) on the charge terminal T1. Referring back to
Physically, an elevated charge Q1 placed over a perfectly conducting plane attracts the free charge on the perfectly conducting plane, which then “piles up” in the region under the elevated charge Q1. The resulting distribution of “bound” electricity on the perfectly conducting plane is similar to a bell-shaped curve. The superposition of the potential of the elevated charge Q1, plus the potential of the induced “piled up” charge beneath it, forces a zero equipotential surface for the perfectly conducting plane. The boundary value problem solution that describes the fields in the region above the perfectly conducting plane may be obtained using the classical notion of image charges, where the field from the elevated charge is superimposed with the field from a corresponding “image” charge below the perfectly conducting plane.
This analysis may also be used with respect to a lossy conducting medium 203 by assuming the presence of an effective image charge Q1′ beneath the guided surface waveguide probe 200. The effective image charge Q1′ coincides with the charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 about a conducting image ground plane 130, as illustrated in
Instead of the image charge Q1′ being at a depth that is equal to the physical height (H1) of the charge Q1, the conducting image ground plane 130 (representing a perfect conductor) is located at a complex depth of z=−d/2 and the image charge Q1′ appears at a complex depth (i.e., the “depth” has both magnitude and phase), given by −D1=−(d/2+d/2+H1)≠H1. For vertically polarized sources over the Earth,
as indicated in Equation (12). The complex spacing of the image charge, in turn, implies that the external field will experience extra phase shifts not encountered when the interface is either a dielectric or a perfect conductor. In the lossy conducting medium, the wave front normal is parallel to the tangent of the conducting image ground plane 130 at z=−d/2, and not at the boundary interface between Regions 1 and 2.
Consider the case illustrated in
In the case of
In the lossy Earth 133, the propagation constant and wave intrinsic impedance are
For normal incidence, the equivalent representation of
Zin=Zo tan h(γoz1). (59)
Equating the image ground plane impedance Zin associated with the equivalent model of
where only the first term of the series expansion for the inverse hyperbolic tangent is considered for this approximation. Note that in the air region 142, the propagation constant is γo=jβo, so Zin=jZo tan βoz1 (which is a purely imaginary quantity for a real z1), but ze is a complex value if σ≠0. Therefore, Zin=Ze only when z1 is a complex distance.
Since the equivalent representation of
Additionally, the “image charge” will be “equal and opposite” to the real charge, so the potential of the perfectly conducting image ground plane 139 at depth z1=−d/2 will be zero.
If a charge Q1 is elevated a distance H1 above the surface of the Earth as illustrated in
In the equivalent image plane models of
At the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 200, the impedance seen “looking up” into the structure is Z↑=Zbase. With a load impedance of:
where CT is the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T1, the impedance seen “looking up” into the vertical feed line conductor 221 (
and the impedance seen “looking up” into the coil 215 (
At the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 200, the impedance seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203 is Z↓=Zin, which is given by:
where Zs=0.
Neglecting losses, the equivalent image plane model can be tuned to resonance when Z↓+Z↑=0 at the physical boundary 136. Or, in the low loss case, X↓+X↑=0 at the physical boundary 136, where X is the corresponding reactive component. Thus, the impedance at the physical boundary 136 “looking up” into the guided surface waveguide probe 200 is the conjugate of the impedance at the physical boundary 136 “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203. By adjusting the load impedance ZL of the charge terminal T1 while maintaining the traveling wave phase delay Φ equal to the angle of the media's wave tilt Ψ, so that Φ=Ψ, which improves and/or maximizes coupling of the probe's electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., Earth), the equivalent image plane models of
It follows from the Hankel solutions, that the guided surface wave excited by the guided surface waveguide probe 200 is an outward propagating traveling wave. The source distribution along the feed network 209 between the charge terminal T1 and the ground stake 218 of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 (
The distinction between the traveling wave phenomenon and standing wave phenomena is that (1) the phase delay of traveling waves (θ=βd) on a section of transmission line of length d (sometimes called a “delay line”) is due to propagation time delays; whereas (2) the position-dependent phase of standing waves (which are composed of forward and backward propagating waves) depends on both the line length propagation time delay and impedance transitions at interfaces between line sections of different characteristic impedances. In addition to the phase delay that arises due to the physical length of a section of transmission line operating in sinusoidal steady-state, there is an extra reflection coefficient phase at impedance discontinuities that is due to the ratio of Zoa/Zob, where Zoa and Zob are the characteristic impedances of two sections of a transmission line such as, e.g., a helical coil section of characteristic impedance Zoa=Zc (
As a result of this phenomenon, two relatively short transmission line sections of widely differing characteristic impedance may be used to provide a very large phase shift. For example, a probe structure composed of two sections of transmission line, one of low impedance and one of high impedance, together totaling a physical length of, say, 0.05λ, may be fabricated to provide a phase shift of 90° which is equivalent to a 0.25λ resonance. This is due to the large jump in characteristic impedances. In this way, a physically short probe structure can be electrically longer than the two physical lengths combined. This is illustrated in
Referring to
At 156, the electrical phase delay Φ of the elevated charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 is matched to the complex wave tilt angle Ψ. The phase delay (θc) of the helical coil and/or the phase delay (θy) of the vertical feed line conductor can be adjusted to make Φ equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). Based on Equation (31), the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt can be determined from:
The electrical phase Φ can then be matched to the angle of the wave tilt. This angular (or phase) relationship is next considered when launching surface waves. For example, the electrical phase delay Φ=θc+θy can be adjusted by varying the geometrical parameters of the coil 215 (
Next at 159, the load impedance of the charge terminal T1 is tuned to resonate the equivalent image plane model of the guided surface waveguide probe 200. The depth (d/2) of the conducting image ground plane 139 of
Based upon the adjusted parameters of the coil 215 and the length of the vertical feed line conductor 221, the velocity factor, phase delay, and impedance of the coil 215 and vertical feed line conductor 221 can be determined using Equations (45) through (51). In addition, the self-capacitance (CT) of the charge terminal T1 can be determined using, e.g., Equation (24). The propagation factor (βp) of the coil 215 can be determined using Equation (35) and the propagation phase constant (βw) for the vertical feed line conductor 221 can be determined using Equation (49). Using the self-capacitance and the determined values of the coil 215 and vertical feed line conductor 221, the impedance (Zbase) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 as seen “looking up” into the coil 215 can be determined using Equations (62), (63) and (64).
The equivalent image plane model of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 can be tuned to resonance by adjusting the load impedance ZL such that the reactance component Xbase of Zbase cancels out the reactance component Xin of Zin, or Xbase+Xin=0. Thus, the impedance at the physical boundary 136 “looking up” into the guided surface waveguide probe 200 is the conjugate of the impedance at the physical boundary 136 “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203. The load impedance ZL can be adjusted by varying the capacitance (CT) of the charge terminal T1 without changing the electrical phase delay Φ=θc+θy of the charge terminal T1. An iterative approach may be taken to tune the load impedance ZL for resonance of the equivalent image plane model with respect to the conducting image ground plane 139 (or 130). In this way, the coupling of the electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., Earth) can be improved and/or maximized.
This may be better understood by illustrating the situation with a numerical example. Consider a guided surface waveguide probe 200 comprising a top-loaded vertical stub of physical height hp with a charge terminal T1 at the top, where the charge terminal T1 is excited through a helical coil and vertical feed line conductor at an operational frequency (fo) of 1.85 MHz. With a height (H1) of 16 feet and the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., Earth) having a relative permittivity of εr=15 and a conductivity of σ1=0.010 mhos/m, several surface wave propagation parameters can be calculated for fo=1.850 MHz. Under these conditions, the Hankel crossover distance can be found to be Rx=54.5 feet with a physical height of hp=5.5 feet, which is well below the actual height of the charge terminal T1. While a charge terminal height of H1=5.5 feet could have been used, the taller probe structure reduced the bound capacitance, permitting a greater percentage of free charge on the charge terminal T1 providing greater field strength and excitation of the traveling wave.
The wave length can be determined as:
where c is the speed of light. The complex index of refraction is:
n=√{square root over (εr−jx)}=7.529−j6.546, (68)
from Equation (41), where x=σi/ωεo with ω=2πfo, and the complex Brewster angle is:
θi,B=arctan(√{square root over (εr−jx)})=85.6−j3.744°. (69)
from Equation (42). Using Equation (66), the wave tilt values can be determined to be:
Thus, the helical coil can be adjusted to match Φ=Ψ=40.614°
The velocity factor of the vertical feed line conductor (approximated as a uniform cylindrical conductor with a diameter of 0.27 inches) can be given as Vw≈0.93. Since hp<<λo, the propagation phase constant for the vertical feed line conductor can be approximated as:
From Equation (49) the phase delay of the vertical feed line conductor is:
θy=βwhw≈βwhp=11.640°. (72)
By adjusting the phase delay of the helical coil so that θc=28.974°=40.614°−11.640°, Φ will equal Ψ to match the guided surface waveguide mode. To illustrate the relationship between Φ and Ψ,
For a helical coil having a conductor diameter of 0.0881 inches, a coil diameter (D) of 30 inches and a turn-to-turn spacing (s) of 4 inches, the velocity factor for the coil can be determined using Equation (45) as:
and the propagation factor from Equation (35) is:
With θc=28.974°, the axial length of the solenoidal helix (H) can be determined using Equation (46) such that:
This height determines the location on the helical coil where the vertical feed line conductor is connected, resulting in a coil with 8.818 turns (N=H/s).
With the traveling wave phase delay of the coil and vertical feed line conductor adjusted to match the wave tilt angle (Φ=θc+θy=Ψ), the load impedance (ZL) of the charge terminal T1 can be adjusted for standing wave resonance of the equivalent image plane model of the guided surface wave probe 200. From the measured permittivity, conductivity and permeability of the Earth, the radial propagation constant can be determined using Equation (57)
γe=√{square root over (jωu1(σ1+jωε1))}=0.25+j0.292 m−1, (76)
And the complex depth of the conducting image ground plane can be approximated from Equation (52) as:
with a corresponding phase shift between the conducting image ground plane and the physical boundary of the Earth given by:
θd=βo(d/2)=4.015−j4.73°. (78)
Using Equation (65), the impedance seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203 (i.e., Earth) can be determined as:
Zin=Zo tan h(jθd)=Rin+jXin=31.191+j26.27 ohms. (79)
By matching the reactive component (Xin) seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203 with the reactive component (Xbase) seen “looking up” into the guided surface wave probe 200, the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode may be maximized. This can be accomplished by adjusting the capacitance of the charge terminal T1 without changing the traveling wave phase delays of the coil and vertical feed line conductor. For example, by adjusting the charge terminal capacitance (CT) to 61.8126 pF, the load impedance from Equation (62) is:
and the reactive components at the boundary are matched.
Using Equation (51), the impedance of the vertical feed line conductor (having a diameter (2a) of 0.27 inches) is given as
and the impedance seen “looking up” into the vertical feed line conductor is given by Equation (63) as:
Using Equation (47), the characteristic impedance of the helical coil is given as
and the impedance seen “looking up” into the coil at the base is given by Equation (64) as:
When compared to the solution of Equation (79), it can be seen that the reactive components are opposite and approximately equal, and thus are conjugates of each other. Thus, the impedance (Zip) seen “looking up” into the equivalent image plane model of
When the electric fields produced by a guided surface waveguide probe 200 (
In summary, both analytically and experimentally, the traveling wave component on the structure of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 has a phase delay (Φ) at its upper terminal that matches the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt of the surface traveling wave (Φ=Ψ). Under this condition, the surface waveguide may be considered to be “mode-matched”. Furthermore, the resonant standing wave component on the structure of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 has a VMAX at the charge terminal T1 and a VMIN down at the image plane 139 (
Referring back to
Equipment such as, e.g., conductivity measurement probes, permittivity sensors, ground parameter meters, field meters, current monitors and/or load receivers can be used to monitor for changes in the operational conditions and provide information about current operational conditions to the adaptive probe control system 230. The probe control system 230 can then make one or more adjustments to the guided surface waveguide probe 200 to maintain specified operational conditions for the guided surface waveguide probe 200. For instance, as the moisture and temperature vary, the conductivity of the soil will also vary. Conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors may be located at multiple locations around the guided surface waveguide probe 200. Generally, it would be desirable to monitor the conductivity and/or permittivity at or about the Hankel crossover distance Rx for the operational frequency. Conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors may be located at multiple locations (e.g., in each quadrant) around the guided surface waveguide probe 200.
The conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors can be configured to evaluate the conductivity and/or permittivity on a periodic basis and communicate the information to the probe control system 230. The information may be communicated to the probe control system 230 through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate wired or wireless communication network. Based upon the monitored conductivity and/or permittivity, the probe control system 230 may evaluate the variation in the index of refraction (n), the complex Brewster angle (θi,B), and/or the wave tilt (|W|ejΨ) and adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 200 to maintain the phase delay (Φ) of the feed network 209 equal to the wave tilt angle (Ψ) and/or maintain resonance of the equivalent image plane model of the guided surface waveguide probe 200. This can be accomplished by adjusting, e.g., θy, θc and/or CT. For instance, the probe control system 230 can adjust the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T1 and/or the phase delay (θy, θc) applied to the charge terminal T1 to maintain the electrical launching efficiency of the guided surface wave at or near its maximum. For example, the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T1 can be varied by changing the size of the terminal. The charge distribution can also be improved by increasing the size of the charge terminal T1, which can reduce the chance of an electrical discharge from the charge terminal T1. In other embodiments, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL. The phase applied to the charge terminal T1 can be adjusted by varying the tap position on the coil 215 (
Field or field strength (FS) meters may also be distributed about the guided surface waveguide probe 200 to measure field strength of fields associated with the guided surface wave. The field or FS meters can be configured to detect the field strength and/or changes in the field strength (e.g., electric field strength) and communicate that information to the probe control system 230. The information may be communicated to the probe control system 230 through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate communication network. As the load and/or environmental conditions change or vary during operation, the guided surface waveguide probe 200 may be adjusted to maintain specified field strength(s) at the FS meter locations to ensure appropriate power transmission to the receivers and the loads they supply.
For example, the phase delay (Φ=θy+θc) applied to the charge terminal T1 can be adjusted to match the wave tilt angle (Ψ). By adjusting one or both phase delays, the guided surface waveguide probe 200 can be adjusted to ensure the wave tilt corresponds to the complex Brewster angle. This can be accomplished by adjusting a tap position on the coil 215 (
The probe control system 230 can be implemented with hardware, firmware, software executed by hardware, or a combination thereof. For example, the probe control system 230 can include processing circuitry including a processor and a memory, both of which can be coupled to a local interface such as, for example, a data bus with an accompanying control/address bus as can be appreciated by those with ordinary skill in the art. A probe control application may be executed by the processor to adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 based upon monitored conditions. The probe control system 230 can also include one or more network interfaces for communicating with the various monitoring devices. Communications can be through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate communication network. The probe control system 230 may comprise, for example, a computer system such as a server, desktop computer, laptop, or other system with like capability.
Referring back to the example of
However, Equation (39) means that the physical height of the guided surface waveguide probe 200 can be relatively small. While this will excite the guided surface waveguide mode, this can result in an unduly large bound charge with little free charge. To compensate, the charge terminal T1 can be raised to an appropriate elevation to increase the amount of free charge. As one example rule of thumb, the charge terminal T1 can be positioned at an elevation of about 4-5 times (or more) the effective diameter of the charge terminal T1.
Referring to
The guided surface waveguide probe 200c includes a feed network 209 that couples an excitation source 212 to the charge terminal T1 and the compensation terminal T2. According to various embodiments, charges Q1 and Q2 can be imposed on the respective charge and compensation terminals T1 and T2, depending on the voltages applied to terminals T1 and T2 at any given instant. I1 is the conduction current feeding the charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 via the terminal lead, and I2 is the conduction current feeding the charge Q2 on the compensation terminal T2 via the terminal lead.
According to the embodiment of
Referring next to
The total effective height can be written as the superposition of an upper effective height (hUE) associated with the charge terminal T1 and a lower effective height (hLE) associated with the compensation terminal T2 such that
hTE=hUE+hLE=hpej(βh
where ΦU is the phase delay applied to the upper charge terminal T1, ΦL is the phase delay applied to the lower compensation terminal T2, β=2π/λp is the propagation factor from Equation (35), hp is the physical height of the charge terminal T1 and hd is the physical height of the compensation terminal T2. If extra lead lengths are taken into consideration, they can be accounted for by adding the charge terminal lead length z to the physical height hp of the charge terminal T1 and the compensation terminal lead length y to the physical height hd of the compensation terminal T2 as shown in
hTE=(hp+z)ej(β(h
The lower effective height can be used to adjust the total effective height (hTE) to equal the complex effective height (heff) of
Equations (85) or (86) can be used to determine the physical height of the lower disk of the compensation terminal T2 and the phase angles to feed the terminals in order to obtain the desired wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance. For example, Equation (86) can be rewritten as the phase shift applied to the charge terminal T1 as a function of the compensation terminal height (hd) to give
To determine the positioning of the compensation terminal T2, the relationships discussed above can be utilized. First, the total effective height (hTE) is the superposition of the complex effective height (hUE) of the upper charge terminal T1 and the complex effective height (hLE) of the lower compensation terminal T2 as expressed in Equation (86). Next, the tangent of the angle of incidence can be expressed geometrically as
which is equal to the definition of the wave tilt, W. Finally, given the desired Hankel crossover distance Rx, the hTE can be adjusted to make the wave tilt of the incident ray match the complex Brewster angle at the Hankel crossover point 121. This can be accomplished by adjusting hp, ΦU, and/or hd.
These concepts may be better understood when discussed in the context of an example of a guided surface waveguide probe. Referring to
An AC source 212 acts as the excitation source for the charge terminal which is coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 200d through a feed network 209 comprising a coil 215 such as, e.g., a helical coil. The AC source 212 can be connected across a lower portion of the coil 215 through a tap 227, as shown in
In the example of
In the example of
With the selected charge terminal T1 configuration, a spherical diameter (or the effective spherical diameter) can be determined. For example, if the charge terminal T1 is not configured as a sphere, then the terminal configuration may be modeled as a spherical capacitance having an effective spherical diameter. The size of the charge terminal T1 can be chosen to provide a sufficiently large surface for the charge Q1 imposed on the terminals. In general, it is desirable to make the charge terminal T1 as large as practical. The size of the charge terminal T1 should be large enough to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the charge terminal. To reduce the amount of bound charge on the charge terminal T1, the desired elevation to provide free charge on the charge terminal T1 for launching a guided surface wave should be at least 4-5 times the effective spherical diameter above the lossy conductive medium (e.g., the Earth). The compensation terminal T2 can be used to adjust the total effective height (hTE) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200d to excite an electric field having a guided surface wave tilt at Rx. The compensation terminal T2 can be positioned below the charge terminal T1 at hd=hT−hp, where hT is the total physical height of the charge terminal T1. With the position of the compensation terminal T2 fixed and the phase delay ΦU applied to the upper charge terminal T1, the phase delay ΦL applied to the lower compensation terminal T2 can be determined using the relationships of Equation (86), such that:
In alternative embodiments, the compensation terminal T2 can be positioned at a height hd where Im{ΦL}=0. This is graphically illustrated in
With the AC source 212 coupled to the coil 215 (e.g., at the 50Ω point to maximize coupling), the position of tap 233 may be adjusted for parallel resonance of the compensation terminal T2 with at least a portion of the coil at the frequency of operation.
As can be seen in
Voltage V2 from the coil 215 can be applied to the charge terminal T1, and the position of tap 224 can be adjusted such that the phase (Φ) of the total effective height (hTE) approximately equals the angle of the guided surface wave tilt (WRx) at the Hankel crossover distance (Rx). The position of the coil tap 224 can be adjusted until this operating point is reached, which results in the ground current through the ammeter 236 increasing to a maximum. At this point, the resultant fields excited by the guided surface waveguide probe 200d are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203, resulting in the launching of a guided surface wave along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203. This can be verified by measuring field strength along a radial extending from the guided surface waveguide probe 200.
Resonance of the circuit including the compensation terminal T2 may change with the attachment of the charge terminal T1 and/or with adjustment of the voltage applied to the charge terminal T1 through tap 224. While adjusting the compensation terminal circuit for resonance aids the subsequent adjustment of the charge terminal connection, it is not necessary to establish the guided surface wave tilt (WRx) at the Hankel crossover distance (Rx). The system may be further adjusted to improve coupling by iteratively adjusting the position of the tap 227 for the AC source 212 to be at the 50Ω point on the coil 215 and adjusting the position of tap 233 to maximize the ground current through the ammeter 236. Resonance of the circuit including the compensation terminal T2 may drift as the positions of taps 227 and 233 are adjusted, or when other components are attached to the coil 215.
In other implementations, the voltage V2 from the coil 215 can be applied to the charge terminal T1, and the position of tap 233 can be adjusted such that the phase (Φ) of the total effective height (hTE) approximately equals the angle (Ψ) of the guided surface wave tilt at Rx. The position of the coil tap 224 can be adjusted until the operating point is reached, resulting in the ground current through the ammeter 236 substantially reaching a maximum. The resultant fields are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203, and a guided surface wave is launched along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203. This can be verified by measuring field strength along a radial extending from the guided surface waveguide probe 200. The system may be further adjusted to improve coupling by iteratively adjusting the position of the tap 227 for the AC source 212 to be at the 50Ω point on the coil 215 and adjusting the position of tap 224 and/or 233 to maximize the ground current through the ammeter 236.
Referring back to
Equipment such as, e.g., conductivity measurement probes, permittivity sensors, ground parameter meters, field meters, current monitors and/or load receivers can be used to monitor for changes in the operational conditions and provide information about current operational conditions to the probe control system 230. The probe control system 230 can then make one or more adjustments to the guided surface waveguide probe 200 to maintain specified operational conditions for the guided surface waveguide probe 200. For instance, as the moisture and temperature vary, the conductivity of the soil will also vary. Conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors may be located at multiple locations around the guided surface waveguide probe 200. Generally, it would be desirable to monitor the conductivity and/or permittivity at or about the Hankel crossover distance Rx for the operational frequency. Conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors may be located at multiple locations (e.g., in each quadrant) around the guided surface waveguide probe 200.
With reference then to
The charge terminals T1 and/or T2 include a conductive mass that can hold an electrical charge, which may be sized to hold as much charge as practically possible. The charge terminal T1 has a self-capacitance C1, and the charge terminal T2 has a self-capacitance C2, which can be determined using, for example, equation (24). By virtue of the placement of the charge terminal T1 directly above the charge terminal T2, a mutual capacitance CM is created between the charge terminals T1 and T2. Note that the charge terminals T1 and T2 need not be identical, but each can have a separate size and shape, and can include different conducting materials. Ultimately, the field strength of a guided surface wave launched by a guided surface waveguide probe 200e is directly proportional to the quantity of charge on the terminal T1. The charge Q1 is, in turn, proportional to the self-capacitance C1 associated with the charge terminal T1 since Q1=C1V, where V is the voltage imposed on the charge terminal T1.
When properly adjusted to operate at a predefined operating frequency, the guided surface waveguide probe 200e generates a guided surface wave along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203. The excitation source 212 can generate electrical energy at the predefined frequency that is applied to the guided surface waveguide probe 200e to excite the structure. When the electromagnetic fields generated by the guided surface waveguide probe 200e are substantially mode-matched with the lossy conducting medium 203, the electromagnetic fields substantially synthesize a wave front incident at a complex Brewster angle that results in little or no reflection. Thus, the surface waveguide probe 200e does not produce a radiated wave, but launches a guided surface traveling wave along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 203. The energy from the excitation source 212 can be transmitted as Zenneck surface currents to one or more receivers that are located within an effective transmission range of the guided surface waveguide probe 200e.
One can determine asymptotes of the radial Zenneck surface current Jρ(ρ) on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 to be J1(ρ) close-in and J2(ρ) far-out, where
where I1 is the conduction current feeding the charge Q1 on the first charge terminal and I2 is the conduction current feeding the charge Q2 on the second charge terminal T2. The charge Q1 on the upper charge terminal T1 is determined by Q1=C1V1, where C1 is the isolated capacitance of the charge terminal T1. Note that there is a third component to J1 set forth above given by (EρQ
The asymptotes representing the radial current close-in and far-out as set forth by equations (90) and (91) are complex quantities. According to various embodiments, a physical surface current J(ρ), is synthesized to match as close as possible the current asymptotes in magnitude and phase. That is to say close-in, |J(ρ)| is to be tangent to |J1|, and far-out |J(ρ)| is to be tangent to |J2|. Also, according to the various embodiments, the phase of J(ρ) should transition from the phase of J1 close-in to the phase of J2 far-out.
In order to match the guided surface wave mode at the site of transmission to launch a guided surface wave, the phase of the surface current |J2| far-out should differ from the phase of the surface current |J1| close-in by the propagation phase corresponding to e−jβ(ρ
Note that this is consistent with equation (17). By Maxwell's equations, such a J(ρ) surface current automatically creates fields that conform to
Thus, the difference in phase between the surface current |J2| far-out and the surface current |J1| close-in for the guided surface wave mode that is to be matched is due to the characteristics of the Hankel functions in equations (93)-(95), which are consistent with equations (1)-(3). It is of significance to recognize that the fields expressed by equations (1)-(6) and (17) and equations (92)-(95) have the nature of a transmission line mode bound to a lossy interface, not radiation fields that are associated with groundwave propagation.
In order to obtain the appropriate voltage magnitudes and phases for a given design of a guided surface waveguide probe 200e at a given location, an iterative approach may be used. Specifically, analysis may be performed of a given excitation and configuration of a guided surface waveguide probe 200e taking into account the feed currents to the terminals T1 and T2, the charges on the charge terminals T1 and T2, and their images in the lossy conducting medium 203 in order to determine the radial surface current density generated. This process may be performed iteratively until an optimal configuration and excitation for a given guided surface waveguide probe 200e is determined based on desired parameters. To aid in determining whether a given guided surface waveguide probe 200e is operating at an optimal level, a guided field strength curve 103 (
In order to arrive at an optimized condition, various parameters associated with the guided surface waveguide probe 200e may be adjusted. One parameter that may be varied to adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 200e is the height of one or both of the charge terminals T1 and/or T2 relative to the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203. In addition, the distance or spacing between the charge terminals T1 and T2 may also be adjusted. In doing so, one may minimize or otherwise alter the mutual capacitance CM or any bound capacitances between the charge terminals T1 and T2 and the lossy conducting medium 203 as can be appreciated. The size of the respective charge terminals T1 and/or T2 can also be adjusted. By changing the size of the charge terminals T1 and/or T2, one will alter the respective self-capacitances C1 and/or C2, and the mutual capacitance CM as can be appreciated.
Still further, another parameter that can be adjusted is the feed network 209 associated with the guided surface waveguide probe 200e. This may be accomplished by adjusting the size of the inductive and/or capacitive reactances that make up the feed network 209. For example, where such inductive reactances comprise coils, the number of turns on such coils may be adjusted. Ultimately, the adjustments to the feed network 209 can be made to alter the electrical length of the feed network 209, thereby affecting the voltage magnitudes and phases on the charge terminals T1 and T2.
Note that the iterations of transmission performed by making the various adjustments may be implemented by using computer models or by adjusting physical structures as can be appreciated. By making the above adjustments, one can create corresponding “close-in” surface current J1 and “far-out” surface current J2 that approximate the same currents J(ρ) of the guided surface wave mode specified in Equations (90) and (91) set forth above. In doing so, the resulting electromagnetic fields would be substantially or approximately mode-matched to a guided surface wave mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203.
While not shown in the example of
Referring now to
The guided surface waveguide probe 200f includes a feed network 209 that comprises an inductive impedance comprising a coil L1a having a pair of leads that are coupled to respective ones of the charge terminals T1 and T2. In one embodiment, the coil L1a is specified to have an electrical length that is one-half (½) of the wavelength at the operating frequency of the guided surface waveguide probe 200f.
While the electrical length of the coil L1a is specified as approximately one-half (½) the wavelength at the operating frequency, it is understood that the coil L1a may be specified with an electrical length at other values. According to one embodiment, the fact that the coil L1a has an electrical length of approximately one-half the wavelength at the operating frequency provides for an advantage in that a maximum voltage differential is created on the charge terminals T1 and T2. Nonetheless, the length or diameter of the coil L1a may be increased or decreased when adjusting the guided surface waveguide probe 200f to obtain optimal excitation of a guided surface wave mode. Adjustment of the coil length may be provided by taps located at one or both ends of the coil. In other embodiments, it may be the case that the inductive impedance is specified to have an electrical length that is significantly less than or greater than ½ the wavelength at the operating frequency of the guided surface waveguide probe 200f.
The excitation source 212 can be coupled to the feed network 209 by way of magnetic coupling. Specifically, the excitation source 212 is coupled to a coil LP that is inductively coupled to the coil L1a. This may be done by link coupling, a tapped coil, a variable reactance, or other coupling approach as can be appreciated. To this end, the coil LP acts as a primary, and the coil L1a acts as a secondary as can be appreciated.
In order to adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 200f for the transmission of a desired guided surface wave, the heights of the respective charge terminals T1 and T2 may be altered with respect to the lossy conducting medium 203 and with respect to each other. Also, the sizes of the charge terminals T1 and T2 may be altered. In addition, the size of the coil L1a may be altered by adding or eliminating turns or by changing some other dimension of the coil L1a. The coil L1a can also include one or more taps for adjusting the electrical length as shown in
Referring next to
With specific reference to
VT=∫0h
where Einc is the strength of the incident electric field induced on the linear probe 303 in Volts per meter, dl is an element of integration along the direction of the linear probe 303, and he is the effective height of the linear probe 303. An electrical load 315 is coupled to the output terminals 312 through an impedance matching network 318.
When the linear probe 303 is subjected to a guided surface wave as described above, a voltage is developed across the output terminals 312 that may be applied to the electrical load 315 through a conjugate impedance matching network 318 as the case may be. In order to facilitate the flow of power to the electrical load 315, the electrical load 315 should be substantially impedance matched to the linear probe 303 as will be described below.
Referring to
The tuned resonator 306a also includes a receiver network comprising a coil LR having a phase shift Φ. One end of the coil LR is coupled to the charge terminal TR, and the other end of the coil LR is coupled to the lossy conducting medium 203. The receiver network can include a vertical supply line conductor that couples the coil LR to the charge terminal TR. To this end, the coil LR (which may also be referred to as tuned resonator LR−CR) comprises a series-adjusted resonator as the charge terminal CR and the coil LR are situated in series. The phase delay of the coil LR can be adjusted by changing the size and/or height of the charge terminal TR, and/or adjusting the size of the coil LR so that the phase Φ of the structure is made substantially equal to the angle of the wave tilt Ψ. The phase delay of the vertical supply line can also be adjusted by, e.g., changing length of the conductor.
For example, the reactance presented by the self-capacitance CR is calculated as 1/jωCR. Note that the total capacitance of the structure 306a may also include capacitance between the charge terminal TR and the lossy conducting medium 203, where the total capacitance of the structure 306a may be calculated from both the self-capacitance CR and any bound capacitance as can be appreciated. According to one embodiment, the charge terminal TR may be raised to a height so as to substantially reduce or eliminate any bound capacitance. The existence of a bound capacitance may be determined from capacitance measurements between the charge terminal TR and the lossy conducting medium 203 as previously discussed.
The inductive reactance presented by a discrete-element coil LR may be calculated as jωL, where L is the lumped-element inductance of the coil LR. If the coil LR is a distributed element, its equivalent terminal-point inductive reactance may be determined by conventional approaches. To tune the structure 306a, one would make adjustments so that the phase delay is equal to the wave tilt for the purpose of mode-matching to the surface waveguide at the frequency of operation. Under this condition, the receiving structure may be considered to be “mode-matched” with the surface waveguide. A transformer link around the structure and/or an impedance matching network 324 may be inserted between the probe and the electrical load 327 in order to couple power to the load. Inserting the impedance matching network 324 between the probe terminals 321 and the electrical load 327 can effect a conjugate-match condition for maximum power transfer to the electrical load 327.
When placed in the presence of surface currents at the operating frequencies power will be delivered from the surface guided wave to the electrical load 327. To this end, an electrical load 327 may be coupled to the structure 306a by way of magnetic coupling, capacitive coupling, or conductive (direct tap) coupling. The elements of the coupling network may be lumped components or distributed elements as can be appreciated.
In the embodiment shown in
While a receiving structure immersed in an electromagnetic field may couple energy from the field, it can be appreciated that polarization-matched structures work best by maximizing the coupling, and conventional rules for probe-coupling to waveguide modes should be observed. For example, a TE20 (transverse electric mode) waveguide probe may be optimal for extracting energy from a conventional waveguide excited in the TE20 mode. Similarly, in these cases, a mode-matched and phase-matched receiving structure can be optimized for coupling power from a surface-guided wave. The guided surface wave excited by a guided surface waveguide probe 200 on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203 can be considered a waveguide mode of an open waveguide. Excluding waveguide losses, the source energy can be completely recovered. Useful receiving structures may be E-field coupled, H-field coupled, or surface-current excited.
The receiving structure can be adjusted to increase or maximize coupling with the guided surface wave based upon the local characteristics of the lossy conducting medium 203 in the vicinity of the receiving structure. To accomplish this, the phase delay (Φ) of the receiving structure can be adjusted to match the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt of the surface traveling wave at the receiving structure. If configured appropriately, the receiving structure may then be tuned for resonance with respect to the perfectly conducting image ground plane at complex depth z=−d/2.
For example, consider a receiving structure comprising the tuned resonator 306a of
where εr comprises the relative permittivity and σ1 is the conductivity of the lossy conducting medium 203 at the location of the receiving structure, ε0 is the permittivity of free space, and ω=2πf, where f is the frequency of excitation. Thus, the wave tilt angle (Ψ) can be determined from Equation (97).
The total phase shift (Φ=θc+θy) of the tuned resonator 306a includes both the phase delay (θc) through the coil LR and the phase delay of the vertical supply line (θy). The spatial phase delay along the conductor length lw of the vertical supply line can be given by θy=βwlw, where βw is the propagation phase constant for the vertical supply line conductor. The phase delay due to the coil (or helical delay line) is θc=βplC, with a physical length of lC and a propagation factor of
where Vf is the velocity factor on the structure, λ0 is the wavelength at the supplied frequency, and λp is the propagation wavelength resulting from the velocity factor Vf. One or both of the phase delays (θc+θy) can be adjusted to match the phase shift Φ to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt. For example, a tap position may be adjusted on the coil LR of
Once the phase delay (Φ) of the tuned resonator 306a has been adjusted, the impedance of the charge terminal TR can then be adjusted to tune to resonance with respect to the perfectly conducting image ground plane at complex depth z=−d/2. This can be accomplished by adjusting the capacitance of the charge terminal T1 without changing the traveling wave phase delays of the coil LR and vertical supply line. The adjustments are similar to those described with respect to
The impedance seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203 to the complex image plane is given by:
Zin=Rin+jXin=Zo tan h(jβo(d/2)), (99)
where βo=ω√{square root over (μoεo)}. For vertically polarized sources over the Earth, the depth of the complex image plane can be given by:
d/2≈1/√{square root over (jωμ1σ1−ω2μ1ε1)}, (100)
where μ1 is the permeability of the lossy conducting medium 203 and ε1=εrεo.
At the base of the tuned resonator 306a, the impedance seen “looking up” into the receiving structure is Z↑=Zbase as illustrated in
where CR is the self-capacitance of the charge terminal TR, the impedance seen “looking up” into the vertical supply line conductor of the tuned resonator 306a is given by:
and the impedance seen “looking up” into the coil LR of the tuned resonator 306a is given by:
By matching the reactive component (Xin) seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 203 with the reactive component (Xbase) seen “looking up” into the tuned resonator 306a, the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode may be maximized.
Referring next to
Referring to
At 187, the electrical phase delay Φ of the receiving structure is matched to the complex wave tilt angle Ψ defined by the local characteristics of the lossy conducting medium 203. The phase delay (θc) of the helical coil and/or the phase delay (θy) of the vertical supply line can be adjusted to make Φ equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). The angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt can be determined from Equation (86). The electrical phase Φ can then be matched to the angle of the wave tilt. For example, the electrical phase delay Φ=θc+θy can be adjusted by varying the geometrical parameters of the coil LR and/or the length (or height) of the vertical supply line conductor.
Next at 190, the load impedance of the charge terminal TR can be tuned to resonate the equivalent image plane model of the tuned resonator 306a. The depth (d/2) of the conducting image ground plane 139 (
Based upon the adjusted parameters of the coil LR and the length of the vertical supply line conductor, the velocity factor, phase delay, and impedance of the coil LR and vertical supply line can be determined. In addition, the self-capacitance (CR) of the charge terminal TR can be determined using, e.g., Equation (24). The propagation factor (βp) of the coil LR can be determined using Equation (98), and the propagation phase constant (βw) for the vertical supply line can be determined using Equation (49). Using the self-capacitance and the determined values of the coil LR and vertical supply line, the impedance (Zbase) of the tuned resonator 306a as seen “looking up” into the coil LR can be determined using Equations (101), (102), and (103).
The equivalent image plane model of
Referring to
=∫∫A
where is the coupled magnetic flux, μr is the effective relative permeability of the core of the magnetic coil 309, μo is the permeability of free space, is the incident magnetic field strength vector, {circumflex over (n)} is a unit vector normal to the cross-sectional area of the turns, and ACS is the area enclosed by each loop. For an N-turn magnetic coil 309 oriented for maximum coupling to an incident magnetic field that is uniform over the cross-sectional area of the magnetic coil 309, the open-circuit induced voltage appearing at the output terminals 330 of the magnetic coil 309 is
where the variables are defined above. The magnetic coil 309 may be tuned to the guided surface wave frequency either as a distributed resonator or with an external capacitor across its output terminals 330, as the case may be, and then impedance-matched to an external electrical load 336 through a conjugate impedance matching network 333.
Assuming that the resulting circuit presented by the magnetic coil 309 and the electrical load 336 are properly adjusted and conjugate impedance matched, via impedance matching network 333, then the current induced in the magnetic coil 309 may be employed to optimally power the electrical load 336. The receive circuit presented by the magnetic coil 309 provides an advantage in that it does not have to be physically connected to the ground.
With reference to
It is also characteristic of the present guided surface waves generated using the guided surface waveguide probes 200 described above that the receive circuits presented by the linear probe 303, the mode-matched structure 306, and the magnetic coil 309 will load the excitation source 212 (e.g.,
Thus, together one or more guided surface waveguide probes 200 and one or more receive circuits in the form of the linear probe 303, the tuned mode-matched structure 306, and/or the magnetic coil 309 can make up a wireless distribution system. Given that the distance of transmission of a guided surface wave using a guided surface waveguide probe 200 as set forth above depends upon the frequency, it is possible that wireless power distribution can be achieved across wide areas and even globally.
The conventional wireless-power transmission/distribution systems extensively investigated today include “energy harvesting” from radiation fields and also sensor coupling to inductive or reactive near-fields. In contrast, the present wireless-power system does not waste power in the form of radiation which, if not intercepted, is lost forever. Nor is the presently disclosed wireless-power system limited to extremely short ranges as with conventional mutual-reactance coupled near-field systems. The wireless-power system disclosed herein probe-couples to the novel surface-guided transmission line mode, which is equivalent to delivering power to a load by a waveguide or a load directly wired to the distant power generator. Not counting the power required to maintain transmission field strength plus that dissipated in the surface waveguide, which at extremely low frequencies is insignificant relative to the transmission losses in conventional high-tension power lines at 60 Hz, all of the generator power goes only to the desired electrical load. When the electrical load demand is terminated, the source power generation is relatively idle.
Referring next to
Similarly, with reference to
Further, with reference to
Further, with reference to
Further, with reference to
The guided surface waveguide probes described above can be configured to transmit power at multiple frequencies according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, such guided surface waveguide probes can be configured to simultaneously transmit power at the multiple frequencies.
Each AC source 212 acts as an independent excitation source for the charge terminal T1. The power sources 212 are coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 200g through the feed network 209. Each AC source 212 can be coupled to a lower portion of the coil 215 by way of conductive (direct tap) coupling, as shown in
As shown in
The coil 215 can be coupled to a ground stake 218 at a first end and the charge terminal T1 at a second end. In some embodiments, the tap of the charge terminal T1 and the second end of the coil 215 can be adjusted via a variable tap. For example, the guided surface waveguide probe 200g of
The compensation terminal T2 can be positioned above and substantially parallel with the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., the ground or earth), and can be coupled to the coil 215 through a variable tap on the coil 215. A compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can be disposed between the compensation terminal T2 and the coil 215 as shown in the example of
An ammeter 236 located between the coil 215 and ground stake 218 can be used to provide an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (I0) at the base of the guided surface waveguide probe. This measurement can be a factor, among other factors described above, in adjusting the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200g. Alternatively, a current clamp can be used around the conductor coupled to the ground stake 218 to obtain an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (I0). However, it should be noted that since the adjustments are frequency dependent, the ammeter measurement should be measured according to particular frequency associated with the adjustment at any given time.
Note that the charges Q1 and Q2 seen on the terminals at a given point in time are dependent upon the excitation by the multiple AC sources 212. Accordingly, the charge terminal T1 and compensation terminal T2 should be sized appropriately for the peak charge to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the terminal.
It is possible to adjust the total effective height (hTE) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200g to excite an electric field guided surface wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distances (Rx) that launch a guided surface wave, as has been previously discussed. The Hankel crossover distance (Rx) will vary with the operating frequency of the AC source 212 used to excite the charge terminal T1. As previously discussed, the Hankel crossover distance (Rx) increases as the operating frequency is lowered.
The probe control system 230 can be used to adjust the various elements (e.g., the positioning of the charge terminal T1, the positioning of the compensation terminal T2, etc.) to excite the charge terminal T1 with the phase shift (Φ) of the complex effective height (heff) equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (at the Hankel crossover distance), or Φ=Ψ. When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge Q1 oscillating on the charge terminal T1 is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode, which produces a guided surface wave traveling along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 203. For example, if the Brewster angle (θi,B), the phase delay (θy) associated with the vertical feed line conductor 221, and the configuration of the coil 215 are known, then the positions of the various taps can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 with phase Φ=Ψ. The tap positions can be adjusted to maximize coupling the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode.
The probe control system 230 can be also be used to adjust for variations in operational conditions associated with the guided surface waveguide probe 200g. Various factors that can be considered by the probe control system 230 in adjusting the guided surface waveguide probe 200g can include, but are not limited to, a current flow measurement obtained from the ammeter 236, a ground parameters measurement obtained from a ground parameter meter 2036, a field measurement corresponding to the operating frequency of the active AC source 212 which can be measured via a field meter 2039, the current supplied by a given AC source 212, the electrical load seen by the guided surface waveguide probe 200g, and/or other factors.
For example, the field meter 2039 may be tuned to a particular operational frequency and placed at an appropriate distance from the guided surface waveguide probe 200g. Accordingly, adjustments to the probe control system 230 with respect to the particular operational frequency can be made as set forth above until a maximum and/or other desired field strength of the guided surface wave at the particular operational frequency is detected from the field meter 2039 may be obtained.
The ground parameter meter(s) 2036 can be distributed about the guided surface waveguide probe 200g at about the transition distance associated with the radial surface currents at the operating frequency. The ground parameter meter(s) 2036 can be configured to determine the conductivity and permittivity of the lossy conducting medium on a periodic basis and communicate the information to the probe control system 230 for potential adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 200g. In some cases, the ground parameter meter(s) 2036 may communicate the information to the probe control system 230 only when a change in the monitored conditions is detected.
In addition, the probe control system 230 can control which of the source switches 2018 are closed and/or open at a particular time. Since the AC sources 212 supply power at different frequencies, the adjustments to the guided surface waveguide probe 200g can vary based at least in part on the particular AC source 212 energizing the coil 215 at a given instance. For example, if the source switch 2018a for f1 is closed, and the source switches 2018b and 2018c for f2 and f3, respectively, are open, then the probe control system 230 can adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200g with respect to the current operating frequency f1. In addition, the probe control system 230 can control the charge terminal switching mechanism 2024 and the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 to adjust which tap connections are actively coupled to the compensation terminal T2 and charge terminal T1.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
Moving on to
As previously discussed, with the charge terminal T1 positioned at or above the physical height (hp), the feed network 209 including, e.g., the coil 215 and/or the vertical feed line 221 connecting the coil 215 to the charge terminal T1 can be adjusted to match the phase delay (Φ) of the charge Q1 supplied to the charge terminal T1 with the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge Q1 oscillating on the charge terminal T1 is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode, launching a guided surface wave along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 203. For example, if the Brewster angle (θi,B), the phase delay (θy) associated with the vertical feed line conductor 221, and the configuration of the coil 215 are known, then the position of the tap can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 with phase Φ=Ψ. The position of the tap 224 can be adjusted to maximize the coupling of the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode.
In some embodiments, the guided surface waveguide probe 200h can be adjusted based upon the operational frequency, f1, f2, or f3 of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. In some cases, the different frequencies, f1, f2, and f3, may be within a specific range such that the guided surface waveguide probe 200h can still operate under the same operational adjustments for all of the frequencies f1, f2, and f3 without additional adjustment. In other embodiments, the center frequency of the frequencies, f1, f2, and f3, generated by the different AC sources 212 can be determined, and used to adjust the guided surface waveguide probe.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
Turning now to
Each AC source 212 acts as an independent excitation source for the charge terminal T1. The AC sources 212 can be coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 200i through the coil 215. Each AC source 212 can be coupled to a lower portion of the coil 215 by way of conductive (direct tap) coupling, as shown in
As shown in
The coil 215 may be coupled to a ground stake 218 at a first end and the charge terminal T1 at a second end. In some embodiments, the tap connecting the charge terminal T1 to the second end of the coil 215 can be variable and, therefore, may be adjusted. This adjustment can occur via a type of charge terminal switching mechanism 2024 (see, e.g.,
The compensation terminal T2 can positioned above and substantially parallel to the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., the ground or earth), and is coupled to a tap on the coil 215. A respective compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 (e.g., 2027a, 2027b, 2027c) corresponding to each of the operating frequencies can be disposed between the compensation terminal T2 and the coil 215. Each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can include multiple terminals which are coupled to multiple taps along the coil 215 such that the connection to the compensation terminal T2 may be adjusted accordingly. Each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 allows current to flow between one of the terminals of the respective compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 and the compensation terminal T2. The remaining terminals of the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 are open, thereby interrupting current flow between the other taps of the coil 215 and the compensation terminal T2. For each operating frequency (e.g., f1, f2, and/or f3), there may be a respective tap connection connecting the compensation terminal T2 to the coil 215, either directly or through a compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027.
Accordingly, in the example of
Although illustrated as a switch in
In some embodiments, a filter component 2045 (e.g., 2045a, 2045b, 2045c) can be positioned between the tap of the coil 215 and the compensation terminal T2 for each respective frequency. The filter component 2045 may be configured to only pass frequencies within a certain frequency band such that each connection between the compensation terminal T2 and the coil 215 corresponds to a specific operating frequency. For example, only f1 passes through a first filter component 2045a and only f2 passes through a second filter component 2045b. Therefore, unwanted frequency components or features may be removed. The filter component(s) 2045 may comprise, for example, a bandpass filter, a diplexer, a low pass filter, a high pass filter, a dipole trap and/or any other appropriate component that may be used to filter out any undesired frequencies associated with the other AC sources 212 that may also be exciting the coil 215.
An ammeter 236 located between the coil 215 and ground stake 218 can be used to provide an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (Io) at the base of the guided surface waveguide probe. This measurement may be a factor, among other factors described above, in adjusting the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200i for optimal efficiency. However, it should be noted that since the adjustments are frequency dependent, the ammeter measurement should be measured according to particular frequency associated with the adjustment at any given time.
Note that the charges Q1 and Q2 seen on the terminals at a given point in time are dependent upon the excitation by the multiple AC sources 212. Accordingly, the charge terminal T1 and compensation terminal T2 should be sized appropriately for the peak charge to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the terminal.
It is possible to adjust the total effective height (hTE) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200i for each of the operating frequencies to excite corresponding electric fields having a guided surface wave tilt at respective Hankel crossover distances (Rx), as has been previously discussed. A different Hankel crossover distance (Rx) can exist for each of the different operating frequencies of the AC sources 212 used to excite the charge terminal T1. As previously discussed, the Hankel crossover distance (Rx) increases as the operating frequency is lowered. The separate tap positions for the compensation terminal T2 ensure that at each respective frequency, the total effective height (hTE) and phase shift (Φ) are appropriate.
The compensation terminal switching mechanism(s) 2027 positioned between the coil 215 and the compensation terminal T2 can be controlled by a probe control system 230. The probe control system 230 can be used to adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200i such that the guided surface waveguide probe 200i can simultaneously launch guided surface waves at multiple frequencies and optimal efficiency. For example, the probe control system 230 can control the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 to actively adjust the position of the tap coupled to the compensation terminal T2. The adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 200i is similar to the adjustments as described above with respect to other embodiments of the guided surface waveguide probes.
In addition, each component associated with a corresponding operating frequency can be independently controlled without interfering with the various components associated with the other operating frequencies. Various factors that can be considered by the probe control system 230 for adjusting the guided surface waveguide probe 200i include, but are not limited to, a current flow measurement obtained from the ammeter 236, a ground parameters measurement obtained from a ground parameter meter 2036, field measurements corresponding to each of the operating frequencies of the active AC sources 212 measured by a field meter 2039, the current supplied by a given AC source 212, the electrical load seen by the guided surface waveguide probe 200i, and/or other factors. It should be noted that the launch efficiency for each operating frequency can be adjusted independently.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
Referring next to
During operation, charges Q1, Q2, and Q3 are imposed on the terminals T1, T2, and T3 respectively, depending on the voltages applied to the terminals T1, T2, and T3 at any given instant. As previously discussed, the charge Q1 on the upper charge terminal T1 can be determined by Q1=C1V1, where C1 is the isolated capacitance of the charge terminal T1 and V1 is the voltage applied to the charge terminal T1. Accordingly, the charge Q2 on the compensation terminal T2 can be determined by Q2=C2V2, where C2 is the isolated capacitance of the charge terminal T2 and V2 is the voltage applied to the charge terminal T2. Further, the charge Q3 on the compensation terminal T3 can be determined by Q3=C3V3, where C3 is the isolated capacitance of the charge terminal T3 and V3 is the voltage applied to the charge terminal T3.
The first AC source 212a and the second AC source 212b each act as an excitation source for the charge terminal T1. The first AC source 212a can be configured to operate at a first frequency of f1, and the second AC source 212b can be configured to operate at a second frequency of f2. The first AC source 212a and the second AC source 212b are coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 200j through the coil 215 of the feed network 209. As described above with respect to other embodiments of the guided surface waveguide probes 200, the first AC source 212a and the second AC source 212b can be coupled to a lower portion of the coil 215 through inductive coupling, as shown in
The guided surface waveguide probe 200j can further comprise isolation components 2042 disposed between each AC source 212 and the coil 215. Since each AC source 212 can simultaneously/concurrently provide voltage to the coil 215 at different frequencies, the isolation components 2042 can be used to isolate the first AC source 212a from voltage provided to the coil 215 by the second AC source 212b. Therefore, the energy provided from the first AC source 212a is prevented from feeding back to the second AC source 212b. Likewise, the energy provided from the second AC source 212b is prevented from feeding back to the first AC source 212a. The isolation components 2042 can comprise, for example, an isolator, a bandpass filter, a narrow band coupler, a circulator, an amplifier, and/or any other appropriate component capable of isolating feedback from the power provided from each AC source 212.
The coil 215 can be coupled to a ground stake 218 at a first end and the charge terminal T1 at a second end. In some embodiments, the tap of the charge terminal T1 and the second end of the coil 215 may be variable and, therefore, can be adjusted. This adjustment can occur via a type of charge terminal switching mechanism 2024 (see
The first compensation terminal T2 and the second compensation terminal T3 are each positioned above and substantially parallel with the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., the ground or earth), and are each coupled to a corresponding tap of the coil 215 that has been adjusted for the particular operating frequency. A first compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a can be disposed between the first compensation terminal T2 and the coil 215, and a second compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027b can be positioned between the second compensation terminal T3 and the coil 215. Each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a, 2027b can include multiple terminals which are coupled to multiple taps along the coil 215 such that the connection to the respective compensation terminal (e.g., T2 or T3) can be adjusted accordingly.
Each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can be configured to allow current to flow between one of the terminals of the compensation terminal switching mechanisms 2027a or 2027b and the respective compensation terminal T2 or T3. The remaining terminals of each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a or 2027b are open such that the current is interrupted through the other taps of the coil 215.
The tap connection between the coil 215 and the first compensation terminal T2 can be adjusted with respect to the first operating frequency f1 of the first AC source 212a along with other various factors as previously discussed. Likewise, the tap connection between the coil 215 and the second compensation terminal T3 can be adjusted with respective to the second operating frequency f2 of the second AC source 212b. For example, the first compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a and the second compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027b can be independently controlled to adjust which terminal is actively coupled to the coil 215. In some embodiments, the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can also be configured to disconnect the compensation terminal T2 from the coil 215 through that connection.
It should be noted that although the drawings appear to illustrate that the terminals of each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a and 2027b connect to taps at respective sections of the coil 215 for each operating frequency, the terminals of each of the compensation terminal switching mechanisms 2027a and 2027b can be connected to taps along any portion of the coil 215. In addition, two or more compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a and 2027b can be connected to the same tap. Accordingly, the guided surface waveguide probe 200j can be adjusted such that the tap connection corresponding to the first operating frequency f1 and the tap connection correspond to the second operating frequency f2 are the same tap of the coil 215.
Specifically, one or more terminals of the first compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a can be connected to the same tap(s) of the coil 215 as one or more terminals of the second compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027b. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027a associated with the first operating frequency f1 and the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027b associated with the second operating frequency f2 can both be adjusted such that each are actively coupled at the same tap on the coil 215.
Although illustrated as a switch in
In some embodiments, filter components 2045 can be disposed between the coil 215 and the first compensation terminal T2 for the operating frequency of the first AC source 212a, and disposed between the tap of the coil 215 and the second compensation terminal T3 for the operating frequency of the second AC source 212b. The filter components 2045 can be configured to remove unwanted frequency features and pass only signals with frequencies within a frequency band corresponding to the appropriate frequency for the respective compensation terminal 2027, so only f1 passes through the first filter component 2045a and only f2 passes through the second filter component 2045b. The filter components 2045 can comprise, for example, a bandpass filter, a diplexer, a low pass filter, a high pass filter, a dipole trap and/or any other appropriate component that can be used to filter out or eliminate any undesired frequencies associated with the other AC sources 212 that can also be energizing the coil 215.
An ammeter 236 located between the coil 215 and ground stake 218 can be used to provide an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (Io) at the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 200j. This measurement can be a factor, among other factors described above, in adjusting the operation of guided surface waveguide probe 200j. However, it should be noted that since the adjustments are frequency dependent, the ammeter measurement should be measured according to particular frequency associated with the adjustment at any given time.
Note that the charges Q1, Q2, and Q3 seen on the terminals at a given point in time are dependent upon the excitation by the multiple AC sources 212. Accordingly, the charge terminal T1, compensation terminal T2, and compensation terminal T3 should be sized appropriately for the peak charge to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the terminal.
It is possible to adjust the total effective height (hTE) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200j for each of the operating frequencies to excite corresponding electric fields having a guided surface wave tilt at respective Hankel crossover distances (Rx), as has been previously discussed. There are different Hankel crossover distances (Rx) for each of the different operating frequencies of the AC sources 212 used to excite the charge terminal T1. As previously discussed, the Hankel crossover distance (Rx) increases as the operating frequency is lowered. The separate tap positions for the compensation terminal T2 ensure that at each respective frequency, the total effective height (hTE) and phase shift (Φ) are appropriate.
Further, as previously discussed, with the charge terminal T1 positioned at or above the physical height (hp) of the complex effective height, the feed network 209 including the coil 215 and/or the vertical feed line 221 connecting the coil 215 to the charge terminal T1, and/or the positions of the taps for the compensation terminals T2, T3 can be adjusted to match the phase (Φ) of the charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 with respect to the charge Q2 or Q3 on the compensation terminal T2 or T3, respectively, to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge oscillating Q1 on the charge terminal T1 is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode traveling along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 203. For example, if the Brewster angle (θi,B), the phase delay (θy) associated with the vertical feed line conductor 221, and the configuration of the coil 215 are known, then the positions of the taps can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 with phase Φ=Ψ. The positions of the taps can be adjusted to maximize coupling of the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode.
The compensation terminal switching mechanism(s) 2027 disposed between the coil 215, the first compensation terminal T2, and the second compensation terminal T3 can be controlled by a probe control system 230. The probe control system 230 can be used to adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200j such that the guided surface waveguide probe 200j can simultaneously launch signals at multiple frequencies and optimal efficiency. For example, the probe control system 230 can control the respective compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 to adjust which tap connection is actively coupled to the compensation terminal T2 or T3.
The adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 200j is similar to the adjustments as described above with respect to other embodiments of the guided surface waveguide probes 200. In addition, each component associated with a corresponding operating frequency can be independently controlled without interfering with the various components associated with the other operating frequencies. Various factors that can be considered by the probe control system 230 for adjusting the guided surface waveguide probe 200j can include, but are not limited to, a current flow measurement obtained from the ammeter 236, a ground parameters measurement obtained from a ground parameter meter 2036, field measurements corresponding to each of the operating frequencies of the active AC sources 212 as measured by a field meter 2039, the current supplied by a given AC source 212, the electrical load seen by the guided surface waveguide probe 200j, and/or other factors. It should be noted that the launch efficiency for each operating frequency can be adjusted independently.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
Moving on to
Each AC source 212 acts as an independent excitation source for the charge terminal T1. Each AC source 212 can be coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 202k via a respective feed network 209 (e.g., 209a . . . 209N) which can include a respective coil 215. The AC sources 212 can be coupled to a lower portion of the respective coil 215 by way of conductive (direct tap) coupling, as shown in
Each coil 215 can be coupled to a respective ground stake 236 at a first end and the charge terminal T1 via a charge terminal N-plexer 2048 at a second end. Some or all of the coils 215 can also use a common ground stake 236. In some embodiments, the tap of the charge terminal T1 and the second end of the coil 215 can be variable, and therefore, can be adjusted. This adjustment can occur via charge terminal switching mechanisms 2024 (see
The charge terminal N-plexer 2048 comprises two or more inputs corresponding to a respective tap of the coils 215. Accordingly, N is defined by the number of coils 215 within the guided surface waveguide probe 200k. The charge terminal N-plexer 2048 implements multiple frequency domain multiplexing such that the signals having different frequencies from each of the taps of the coils 215 corresponding to the charge terminal T1 can be combined and output to the charge terminal T1 without interfering with each other.
The compensation terminal T2 is positioned above and substantially parallel with the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., the ground or earth), and coupled to a tap on each coil 215 via a compensation terminal N-plexer 2051. As discussed above with respect to the charge terminal N-plexer 2048, the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 comprises two or more inputs that correspond to the taps of the coils 215 associated with the compensation terminal T2. The output of the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 is coupled to the compensation terminal T2. The output of the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 can be a combination of each of the signals from the coils 215a . . . , 215N. Since each coil 215 can be excited at a different frequency, the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 can combine some or all of the signals to create the output signal without interference between the different signals.
A respective compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 corresponding to each of the different operating frequencies can be disposed between the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 and each coil 215. Each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 (e.g., 2027a, . . . 2027N) can include multiple terminals coupled to multiple taps along the respective coil 215 such that the connection to the compensation terminal T2 via the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 can be adjusted accordingly. It should be noted that although the drawing appears to illustrate that the terminals of each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 connect to taps at a particular section of the coils 215, the terminals of each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can be connected to taps along any portion of the respective coil 215. In some embodiments, the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can also be configured to disconnect the corresponding coil 215 from the N-plexer 2051.
Each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 allows current to flow between one of the terminals of the respective compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 and the compensation terminal T2 via the N-plexer 2051. The remaining terminals of each compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 are open, thereby interrupting current flow between the other taps of the respective coil 215 and the compensation terminal T2. For each operating frequency (e.g., f1 . . . fN), there can be a different set of taps connecting the compensation terminal N-plexer 2051 to the respective coil 215. The compensation terminal switching mechanism 2051 can be controlled to adjust which terminal is actively coupled to the coil 215.
Although illustrated as a switch in
An ammeter 236 located between each coil 215 and ground stake 218 can be used to provide an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (Io) at the base of the guided surface waveguide probe for each respective coil 215. This measurement can be a factor, among other factors described above, in adjusting the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200k for optimal efficiency as described above with respect to other embodiments of the guided surface waveguide probes. However, it should be noted that since the adjustments are frequency dependent, the ammeter measurement should be measured according to particular frequency associated with the adjustment at any given time.
Note that the charges Q1 and Q2 seen on the terminals at a given point in time are dependent upon the excitation by the multiple AC sources 212. Accordingly, the charge terminal T1 and compensation terminal T2 should be sized appropriately for the peak charge to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the terminal.
It is possible to adjust the total effective height (hTE) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200k for each of the operating frequencies to excite corresponding electric fields having a guided surface wave tilt at respective Hankel crossover distances (Rx), as has been previously discussed. There are different Hankel crossover distances (Rx) for each of the different operating frequencies of the AC sources 212 used to excite the charge terminal T1. As previously discussed, the Hankel crossover distance (Rx) increases as the operating frequency is lowered. The separate tap positions for the compensation terminal T2 ensure that at each respective frequency, the total effective height (hTE) and phase shift (Φ) are appropriate.
The probe control system 230 can be used to adjust the various elements (e.g., the positioning of the charge terminal T1, the positioning of the compensation terminal T2, etc.) to excite the charge terminal T1 with the phase shift (Φ) equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance, or Φ=Ψ. When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge oscillating Q1 on the charge terminal T1 is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode traveling along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 203. For example, if the Brewster angle (θi,B), the phase delay (θy), and the configuration of the coil 215 are known, then the positions of the various taps can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1, with respect to the charge of Q2 on the compensation terminal T2, with phase Φ=Ψ. The tap positions can be adjusted to maximize coupling the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode.
The probe control system 230 can also control the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 disposed between the respective coils 215 and the compensation terminal T2. For example, the probe control system 230 can control the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 to adjust which tap connection is actively coupled to the compensation terminal T2. The adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 200k is similar to the adjustments as described above with respect to other embodiments of the guided surface waveguide probes 200. In addition, each component associated with a corresponding operating frequency can be independently controlled without interfering with the various components associated with the other operating frequencies. Various factors that can be considered by the guided surface waveguide probe 200k for adjusting the probe control system 230 can include, but are not limited to, a current flow measurement obtained from the ammeter 236, a ground parameters measurement obtained from a ground parameter meter 2036, field measurements corresponding to each of the operating frequencies of the active AC sources 212 which can be measured by a field meter 2039, the current supplied by a given AC source 212, the electrical load seen by the guided surface waveguide probe 200k, and/or other factors. It should be noted that the launch efficiency for each operating frequency is adjusted independently.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
Moving on to
As shown in
Each AC source 212 acts as an independent excitation source for the charge terminal T1. The AC sources 212 can be coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 200m through a feed network 209, which can include the coil 215. The AC sources 212 can be connected across a lower portion of the coil 215 by way of conductive (direct tap) coupling, as shown in
The guided surface waveguide probe 200m further comprises isolation components 2042 (e.g., 2042a, 2042b, 2042c) positioned between each AC source 212 and the coil 215. The AC sources 212 simultaneously provide power at different frequencies to the guided surface waveguide probe 200m. As such, the isolation components 2042 isolate each AC source 212 from the other AC sources 212 that are exciting the charge terminal T1. Therefore, the energy provided by each AC source 212 is prevented from feeding back to the other AC sources 212. The isolation components 2042 can comprise, for example, an isolator, a bandpass filter, a narrow band coupler, a circulator, an amplifier, and/or any other appropriate component capable of isolating feedback from each AC source 212.
The coil 215 can be coupled to a ground stake 218 at a first end and the charge terminal T1 at a second end. In some embodiments, the tap of the charge terminal T1 and the second end of the coil 215 may be variable and, therefore, can be adjusted. This adjustment can occur via a type of charge terminal switching mechanism 2024 (see
The compensation terminal T2 can be positioned above and substantially parallel with the lossy conducting medium 203 (e.g., the ground or earth), and coupled to the feed network 209 via a tap on the coil 215. A compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 is disposed between the compensation terminal T2 and the coil 215. The compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 includes multiple terminals coupled to multiple taps along the coil 215 such that the connection to the compensation terminal T2 can be adjusted accordingly. The compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 allows current to flow between one of the terminals of the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 and the compensation terminal T2. The remaining terminals of the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 are open, thereby interrupting current flow between the other taps of the coil 215 and the compensation terminal T2.
Although illustrated as a switch in
In this embodiment, the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 is adjusted for a specific frequency (e.g., f1) generated by a first one of the AC sources 212. The compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 can be controlled to adjust which terminal is actively coupled to the coil 215. The operating frequencies of the other AC sources 212 that are coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 200m can be selected such that the other frequencies are overtones of the original frequency f1. Accordingly, the relationship between the different operating frequencies is such that the adjustment of the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 for the first operating frequency is suitable for the other operating frequencies used to excite the charge terminal T1 and compensation terminal T2.
An ammeter 218 located between the coil 215 and ground stake 218 can be used to provide an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (Io) at the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 200m. This measurement can be a factor, among other factors described above, in adjusting the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200m. However, it should be noted that since the adjustments are frequency dependent, the ammeter measurement should be measured according to particular frequency associated with the adjustment at any given time.
Note that the charges Q1 and Q2 seen on the terminals at a given point in time are dependent upon the excitation by the multiple AC sources 212. Accordingly, the charge terminal T1 and compensation terminal T2 should be sized appropriately for the peak charge to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the terminal.
It is possible to adjust the total effective height (hTE) of the guided surface waveguide probe 200m for the operating frequencies to excite electric fields having a guided surface wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (Rx), as has been previously discussed. For example, the probe control system 230 can be used to adjust the various elements (e.g., the positioning of the charge terminal T1, the positioning of the compensation terminal T2, etc.) to excite the charge terminal T1 with the phase shift (Φ), with respect to the excitation of the compensation terminal, equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance, or Φ=Ψ. When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge oscillating Q1 on the charge terminal T1 is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode traveling along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 203. For example, if the Brewster angle (θi,B), the phase delay (θy), and the configuration of the coil 215 are known, then the positions of the various taps can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 with phase Φ=Ψ. The tap positions can be adjusted to maximize coupling the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode.
The compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 disposed between the coil 215 and the compensation terminal T2 can be controlled by a probe control system 230. The probe control system 230 can be used to adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 200m such that the guided surface waveguide probe 200m can simultaneously launch signals at multiple frequencies and optimal efficiency.
The adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 200m is similar to the adjustments as described above with respect to other embodiments of the guided surface waveguide probes 200. Various factors that can be considered by the guided surface waveguide probe 200m for adjusting the probe control system 230 include, but are not limited to, a current flow measurement obtained from the ammeter 218, a ground parameters measurement obtained from a ground parameter meter 2036, field measurements corresponding to each of the operating frequencies of the active AC sources 212 which can be measured via a field meter 2039, the current supplied by a given AC source 212, the electrical load seen by the guided surface waveguide probe 200m, and/or other factors. In addition, the probe control system 230 can control the compensation terminal switching mechanism 2027 to adjust which tap connection is actively coupled to the compensation terminal T2.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
Moving on to
As previously discussed, with the charge terminal T1 positioned at or above the physical height (hp), the coil 215, and/or the vertical feed line 221 connecting the coil 215 to the charge terminal T1 can be adjusted to match the phase (Φ) of the charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge oscillating Q1 on the charge terminal T1 is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode traveling along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 203. For example, if the Brewster angle (θi,B), the phase delay (θy) associated with the vertical feed line conductor 221, and the configuration of the coil 215 are known, then the position of the tap can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q1 on the charge terminal T1 with phase Φ=Ψ. The position of the tap connecting the charge terminal T1 to the coil 215 can be adjusted to maximize coupling the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode.
In some embodiments, the guided surface waveguide probe 200n can be adjusted according any one of the frequencies, f1, f2, or f3. The different frequencies, f1, f2, and f3, can be within a specific range such that the guided surface waveguide probe 200h can still operate under the same operational adjustments for each frequency f1, f2, and f3. In other embodiments, frequencies f2 and f3 can be an overtone of operating frequency f1 allowing the guided surface waveguide probe 200h to still operate under the same operational adjustments. In some embodiments, the center frequency of the operating frequencies, f1, f2, and f3, generated by the different AC sources 212 can be determined. The center frequency can then be used to adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 200n allowing the guided surface waveguide probe 200n to still effectively operate under the same operational adjustments.
In some implementations, the charge terminal T1 can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance ZL of the guided surface waveguide probe 200h. Without varying the height of the charge terminal T1, the load impedance ZL can be adjusted to improve coupling of the guided surface wave at the operational frequency.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are merely possible examples of implementations set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications can be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims. In addition, all optional and preferred features and modifications of the described embodiments and dependent claims are usable in all aspects of the disclosure taught herein. Furthermore, the individual features of the dependent claims, as well as all optional and preferred features and modifications of the described embodiments are combinable and interchangeable with one another.
This application claims the benefit of, and priority to, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/847,606, entitled “GUIDED SURFACE WAVE TRANSMISSION OF MULTIPLE FREQUENCIES IN A LOSSY MEDIA”, filed on Sep. 8, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/048,994 entitled “GUIDED SURFACE WAVE TRANSMISSION OF MULTIPLE FREQUENCIES IN A LOSSY MEDIA” filed on Sep. 11, 2014, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This application is related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional Patent Application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Mar. 7, 2013 and assigned application Ser. No. 13/789,538, and was published on Sep. 11, 2014 as Publication Number US2014/0252886 A1, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional Patent Application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Mar. 7, 2013 and assigned application Ser. No. 13/789,525, and was published on Sep. 11, 2014 as Publication Number US2014/0252865 A1, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is further related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional Patent Application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Sep. 10, 2014 and assigned application Ser. No. 14/483,089, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is further related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional Patent Application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Waves,” which was filed on Jun. 2, 2015 and assigned application Ser. No. 14/728,507, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is further related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional Patent Application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Waves,” which was filed on Jun. 2, 2015 and assigned application Ser. No. 14/728,492, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
645576 | Telsa | Mar 1900 | A |
649621 | Tesla | May 1900 | A |
685012 | Tesla | Oct 1901 | A |
685953 | Tesla | Nov 1901 | A |
685954 | Tesla | Nov 1901 | A |
685955 | Tesla | Nov 1901 | A |
685956 | Tesla | Nov 1901 | A |
723188 | Tesla | Mar 1903 | A |
725605 | Tesla | Apr 1903 | A |
787412 | Tesla | Apr 1905 | A |
851336 | Von Arco | Apr 1907 | A |
1119732 | Tesla | Dec 1914 | A |
1452849 | Round | Apr 1923 | A |
1652516 | Conrad | Dec 1927 | A |
1691338 | Conrad | Nov 1928 | A |
1947256 | Frits | Feb 1934 | A |
2685068 | Goubau | Jul 1954 | A |
2921277 | Goubau | Jan 1960 | A |
3123767 | Ghose | Mar 1964 | A |
3219954 | Rutelli | Nov 1965 | A |
3445844 | Grossi et al. | May 1969 | A |
3582838 | DeVries | Jun 1971 | A |
3670247 | Gutton et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3742509 | De Bettencourt et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3742511 | Smith et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
4751515 | Corum | Jun 1988 | A |
4808950 | Apostolos et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5045825 | McJunkin | Sep 1991 | A |
5074489 | Gamzon | Dec 1991 | A |
5155495 | Hately et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5293308 | Boys et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301096 | Klontz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5714917 | Ella | Feb 1998 | A |
5835067 | Goodman | Nov 1998 | A |
5920261 | Hughes | Jul 1999 | A |
6025813 | Hately et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6075498 | Talwar | Jun 2000 | A |
6104107 | Avramenko et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107791 | Lee | Aug 2000 | A |
6486846 | Hart | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515878 | Meins et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6650556 | Dinh | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6864849 | Hart | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6956535 | Hart | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7113138 | Hately | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7307589 | Gregoire | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7561096 | Hellsten | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7741734 | Joannopoulos et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775112 | Amemiya | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782264 | Vincent | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7825543 | Karalis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7890053 | Washiro | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894770 | Washiro | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8063717 | Bradley et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8076801 | Karalis et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084889 | Joannopoulos et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8097983 | Karalis et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8299936 | Papadopoulos | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8338991 | Von Novak et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350769 | Crawley | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8378524 | Mita | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384247 | Yerazunis et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395282 | Joannopoulos et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8536738 | Bella | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8587490 | Niver et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8890472 | Mashinsky | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8897697 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8941448 | Yu et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9030363 | Kenington et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9042812 | Bennett et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9154966 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9156364 | Miller et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178504 | Komori | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9882397 | Corum et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20040227667 | Sievenpiper | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263409 | Hart | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050111533 | Berkman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128154 | Hately | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060281423 | Caimi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070035356 | Ranta | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070132489 | Corum | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080122449 | Besser et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080273201 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100052431 | Mita | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100194206 | Burdo | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100259111 | Ruocco et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260076 | Corman | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100264748 | Tucker | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110018650 | Niver et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110049997 | Urano | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062916 | Farahani | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080050 | Thundat et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110133564 | Teo | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110133565 | Teo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156494 | Mashinsky | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169336 | Yerazunis | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120119575 | Kurs | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169568 | Oh et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183091 | Komori | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120248889 | Fukushi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249449 | Tseng | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130029595 | Widmer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130049674 | Davis | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064311 | Turner | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130099584 | Von Novak | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140015344 | Mohamadi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140062813 | Alrabadi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104132 | Bakalski et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140252865 | Corum et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140252886 | Corum et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140308901 | Turner et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319922 | Shinohara | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150109181 | Hyde | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150145339 | Chiyo et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150207334 | Mitcheson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207335 | Madawala | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150280444 | Smith et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170005529 | Burling | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170018852 | Adriazola et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
142352 | Aug 1912 | CA |
0639301 | Feb 1995 | EP |
1898532 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1965223 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2221743 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2568528 | Mar 2013 | EP |
20981 | Nov 1896 | GB |
24421 | Mar 1898 | GB |
11293 | Nov 1901 | GB |
13563 | Nov 1901 | GB |
14579 | Apr 1902 | GB |
8200 | Apr 1906 | GB |
1471860 | Apr 1977 | GB |
2215524 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2330695 | Jun 2002 | GB |
2387969 | Nov 2005 | GB |
H06225481 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2007244015 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2143775 | Dec 1999 | RU |
2161850 | Jan 2001 | RU |
2183376 | Jun 2002 | RU |
2255406 | Jun 2005 | RU |
2273939 | Apr 2006 | RU |
2310964 | Nov 2007 | RU |
2340064 | Nov 2008 | RU |
2341860 | Dec 2008 | RU |
2342761 | Dec 2008 | RU |
2366057 | Aug 2009 | RU |
2366058 | Aug 2009 | RU |
2409883 | Jan 2011 | RU |
2423772 | Jul 2011 | RU |
2459340 | Aug 2012 | RU |
2473160 | Jan 2013 | RU |
2474031 | Jan 2013 | RU |
2488207 | Jul 2013 | RU |
2488208 | Jul 2013 | RU |
2533060 | Nov 2014 | RU |
2544380 | Mar 2015 | RU |
2548571 | Apr 2015 | RU |
2554723 | Jun 2015 | RU |
9313495 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO9323907 | Nov 1993 | WO |
9529516 | Nov 1995 | WO |
0191238 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2007146164 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2010020813 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010111541 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010129369 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011097046 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2013093922 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ling et al., The Propagation and Excitation of Surface Waves in an Absorbing Layer, Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 1998, pp. 49-91, vol. 19. |
Wise, W. Howard , Note on the Accuracy of Rolfs Graphs of Sommerfeld's Attenuation Formula, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Nov. 1930, pp. 1971-1972, vol. 18, No. 11. |
Barlow et al., Surface Waves, The Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, Nov. 1953, pp. 329-347, vol. 100, part iii. |
Barlow et al., An Investigation of the Characteristics of Cylindrical Surface Waves, The Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, Nov. 1953, pp. 321-328, vol. 100, Part III, No. 68. |
Brown et al., The Launching of Radial Cylindrical Surface Waves by a Circumferential Slot, The Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, Mar. 1959, pp. 123-128, vol. 106, Part B. |
Burrows, Charles R., Radio Propagation Over Plane Earth-Field Strength Curves, Bell System Technical Journal, Jan. 1937, pp. 45-75, vol. 16, No. 1. |
Burrows, Charles R., Addendum to: Radio Propagation Over Plane Earth-Field Strength Curves, Bell System Technical Journal, Oct. 1937, pp. 574-577, vol. 16, No. 4. |
Burrows, Charles R., Existence of a Surface Wave in Radio Propagation, Nature, Aug. 15, 1936, p. 284, vol. 138, Nature Publishing Group. |
Burrows, Charles R., The Surface Wave in Radio Propagation Over Plane Earth, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Feb. 1937, pp. 219-229, vol. 25, No. 2. |
Collin, R.E., Hertzian Dipole Radiating Over a Lossy Earth or Sea: Some Early and Late 20th-Century Controversies, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Apr. 2004, pp. 64-79, vol. 46, No. 2. |
Jones, E.M.T., An Annular Corrugated-Surface Antenna, Proceedings of the I.R.E., Jun. 1952, pp. 721-725, vol. 40. |
Fernando et al., An Investigation of the Properties of Radial Cylindrical Surface Waves Launched Over Flat Reactive Surfaces, The Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, May 1956, pp. 307-318, vol. 103, Part B. |
Belrose, John S., A Radioscientist's Reaction to Marconi's First Transatlantic Wireless Experiment—Revisited, Conference Digest, Jul. 2001, pp. 22-25, vol. 1, IEEE Antennas & Propagation Society International Symposium, Boston, MA, US. |
Marconi, Guglielmo, Wireless Telegraphic Communication, Nobel Lecture, Dec. 11, 1909, pp. 196-222. |
Norton, K.A., Propagation of Radio Waves Over a Plane Earth, Nature, Jun. 8, 1935, pp. 954-955, Nature Publishing Group. |
Kukushkin, A.V., On the Existence and Physical Meaning of the Zenneck Wave, Physics—Uspekhi, 2009, pp. 755-756, vol. 52, No. 7, Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, Russian Academy of Sciences. |
Michaels, Charles J., A Load-Tracking L Network, QST, Apr. 1992, p. 74, American Radio Relay League, Inc. |
Feldman, C.B., The Optical Behavior of the Ground for Short Radio Waves, Proceedings of the IRE, Jun. 1933, pp. 764-801, vol. 21, No. 6. |
Rolf, Bruno, Graphs to Prof. Sommerfeld's Attenuation Formula for Radio Waves, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Mar. 1930, pp. 391-402, vol. 18, No. 3. |
Wait, James R., The Ancient and Modem History of EM Ground-Wave Propagation, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Oct. 1998, pp. 7-24, vol. 40, No. 5. |
Zucker, Francis J., Surface-Wave Antennas, Antenna Engineering Handbook, 2007, pp. 10.1-10.32, Chp. 10, McGraw-Hill. |
Smith, Carl E., Short Low Loss AM Antenna, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Jun. 1989, pp. 237-240, vol. 35, No. 2, IEEE. |
Belrose, John S., An Electrically Small Umbrella Antenna for 160 Meters, ARRL Antenna Compendium, 2002, pp. 3-8, vol. 7. |
Belrose, John S., Characteristics of the Crossed Field Antenna Obtained by Numerical and Experimental Modelling, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2005, pp. 21-24, vol. 1B. |
Belrose, John S., Radiation Characteristics of an Electrically Small MF Broadcast Antenna—by Simulation, 11th International Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Apr. 17-20, 2001, pp. 90-94, IEEE Conference Publication No. 480. |
Cobos et al., A Modified Goubau-Type Antenna with Two Octaves of Impedance Bandwidth, Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Jun. 2004, pp. 3051-3054, vol. 3, IEEE. |
Goubau, Georg, Surface Waves and Their Application to Transmission Lines, Journal of Applied Physics, Nov. 1950, pp. 1119-1128, vol. 21. |
Ravipati et al., The Goubau Multi Element Monopole Antenna—Revisited, Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Jun. 2007, pp. 233-236, IEEE. |
Pinzone et al., A New Low Profile Anti-Skywave Antenna for AM Broadcasting, NAB Engineering Conference Proceedings, 1988, 7-15. |
Underhill, Mike, All sorts of small antennas—they are better than you think—heuristics shows why!, Lecture Presentation to the Adelaide Hills Amateur Radio Society, Feb. 2008, pp. 1-144. |
Belrose, John S., The Crossed Field Antenna—Analyzed by Simulation and Experiment, ICAP-JINA Millennium Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Apr. 9-12, 2000, pp. 1-4, Davos, Switzerland. |
Belrose, John S., The Truth and Untruth About Electrically Small Antennas, Amateur Radio Technical Session, QCWA 2004 International Convention, Oct. 15, 2004, pp. 1-8, Ottawa, ON, Canada. |
Hately et al., An Operational MF Broadcast Antenna Using Poynting Vector Synthesis, IEEE ICAP Seventh International Conference 1991, Apr. 1991, pp. 645-648, Conference Publication 333, Part 2. |
Kabbary et al., Phasing and Matching Units for the CFA, URSI Seventeenth National Radio Science Conference, Feb. 22-24, 2000, pp. B22.1-B22.8, Minufiya University, Egypt. |
Underhill, M.J., The Estimation and Measurement of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Small Antennas in an Environment, HF Radio 2003—Ninth International IEE Conference on HF Radio Systems and Techniques, Jun. 23-26, 2003, pp. 1-6, University of Bath, UK. |
Trainotti et al., On the Crossed Field Antenna Performance, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Sep. 2006, pp. 299-317, vol. 52, No. 3. |
Trainotti, Valentin, Short Medium Frequency AM Antennas, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Sep. 2001, pp. 263-284, vol. 47, No. 3. |
Underhill, Mike, Tuneable Coupled (Multi-) Mode Small Antennas-CFA, CFL, EH etc?, Lecture Presentation at the Radio Society of Great Britain Convention, Oct. 2010, pp. 1-167. |
Letter to James Corum from John Musselman regarding the Antenna Installation at Kodiak, Alaska, Jun. 2011. |
Smith, Carl E., Antenna Coupling Unit Network Fig. 2.4, Installed at Radio Station KVOK, exact date unknown, installed some time around or before 1980, Kodiak, Alaska. |
Rice, S.O., Series for the Wave Functions of a Radiating Dipole at the Earth's Surface, BSTJ, Jan. 1937, pp. 101-109, vol. 16, No. 1. |
McDonald, Kirk T., “Crossed-Field” and “EH” Antennas Including Radiation from the Feed Lines and Reflection from the Earth's Surface, Published at http://www.physics.princeton.edu/˜mcdonald/examples/crossedfield.pdf, Jul. 2006; updated Mar. 2010, pp. 1-11. |
McDonald, Kirk T., “Crossed-Field” and “EH” Antennas Including Radiation from the Feed Lines and Reflection from the Earth's Surface, Published at http://www.physics.princeton.edu/˜mcdonald/examples/crossedfield.pdf, Jul. 2006; updated Jun. 2008, pp. 1-18. |
Belrose, John S., On the EH Antenna, antenneX Online, Apr. 2003, pp. 1-4, Issue No. 72. |
Stewart, Brian G., Planning Application submitted by Isle of Man International Broadcasting plc to construct a Crossed Field Antenna at Cranstal, near Bride, Isle of Man, Department of Engineering Glasgow Caledonian University, Aug. 2000, pp. 1-19. |
Hendry et al., Surface Waves for Communication Systems, 3rd SEAS DTC Technical Conference, 2008, A18, Edinburgh, Scotland. |
Watson, W.H., The Physical Principles of Wave Guide Transmission and Antenna Systems, 1947, p. 25, Oxford at the Clarendon Press. |
Pover et al., The Silsden Crossed Field Antenna, Extracts from the report on the performance of an elevated 8 Metre CFA constructed and tested at Silsden in West Yorkshire on Sep. 23-26, 2009. |
Holland, Ralph, Egyptian Daytime Wave Pockets—Speculative Causes, antenneX Online, Apr. 2002, pp. 1-38, Issue No. 60. |
Corum et al., Multiple Resonances in RF Coils and the Failure of Lumped Inductance Models, Sixth International Symposium Nikola Tesla, Oct. 18-20, 2006, Belgrade, SASA, Serbia. |
Jahnke et al., Tables of Functions with Formulae and Curves, 1945, p. 145, 4th Edition, Dover Publications, New York. |
Milligan, T., Modem Antenna Design, 1985, pp. 8-9, 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York. |
Reinartz, J. L., 1XAM's transmitter, QST, Jan. 1924, pp. 26-27. |
Sommerfeld, A., Problems of Radio, Partial Differential Equations in Physics—Lectures on Theoretical Physics, 1949, pp. 246-257, vol. VI, Academic Press, New York. |
Stratton, J. A., Electromagnetic Theory, 1941, p. 516, McGraw-Hill, New York. |
Stutzman et al., Antenna Theory and Design, 1981, p. 82, 92-93, Wiley & Sons, New York. |
Wait, J. R., Complex Image Theory—Revisited, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Aug. 1991, pp. 27-29, vol. 33, No. 4. |
Counterpoises, QST, Sep. 1920, pp. 24-25. |
Ashe, G. B., A Counterpoise Investigation, QST, Dec. 1924, pp. 34-35. |
Bannister, P. R., Summary of Image Theory Expressions for the Quasi-Static Fields of Antennas at or Above the Earth's Surface, Jul. 1979, pp. 1001-1008, vol. 67, No. 7, Proceedings of the IEEE. |
Banos et al., Sommerfeld Surface Wave, Summary of Normal Mode Theory Symposium, IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Jan. 1956, p. 92, vol. AP-4, No. 1. |
Barlow, H. M., Launching a Surface Wave over the Earth, Electronics Letters, Jul. 1967, pp. 304-305, vol. 3, No. 7. |
Westman, H. P., Antenna-Counterpoise Fundamentals, QST, May 1926, p. 46. |
Beverage, H.H., Improving the CW Ground System, OST, Nov. 1921, pp. 25-26. |
Bucher, E. E., The Alexanderson System for Radio Communication, General Electric Review, Oct. 1920, pp. 813-839 (See Fig. 11, p. 820.) vol. 23, No. 10. |
Paknys, R., Evaluation of Hankel Functions with Complex Argument and Complex Order, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, May 1992, pp. 569-578, vol. 40, No. 5. |
Burrows, C. R., Radio Propagation Over Spherical Earth, Proc. IRE, May 1935, pp. 470-480, vol. 23, No. 5; Reprinted in Bell System Tech. Jour., Jul. 1935, pp. 477-488, vol. 14, No. 3. |
Wise, W. H., The Physical Reality of Zenneck's Surface Wave, Bell System Technical Journal, No. 1, Jan. 1937, pp. 35-44, vol. 16, No. 1. |
Burrows, C. R., Addendum to the Effect of the Earth's Curvature on Ground Wave Propagation, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Nov. 1964, pp. 789-791, vol. 12, No. 6. |
Burrows, C. R., Radio Gain, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, May 1967, pp. 404-410, vol. AP-15, No. 3. |
Chu et al., Electromagnetic Waves in Hollow Metal Tubes of Rectangular Cross Section, Proceedings of the IRE, Dec. 1938, pp. 1520-1555, vol. 26, No. 12. |
Ufimtsev et al., Transformation of Surface Waves in Homogeneous Absorbing Layers, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Feb. 2000, pp. 214-222, vol. 48, No. 2. |
Corum et al., Toroidal Helix Antenna, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Jun. 14-19, 1987, pp. 832-835, vol. 25. |
Pinzone et al., A Novel Structure for Improved Directivity, 1988 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium Digest, Jun. 1988, pp. 824-827, vol. 2, IEEE, Syracuse, NY. |
Corum et al., Experimental Validation of the Improved Directivity Element—Elevation Plane Control, 1989 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium Digest, Jun. 1989, pp. 702-705, vol. 2, IEEE, San Jose, CA. |
Corum et al., A Concentric Array for Low and Medium Frequencies, 1990 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium Digest, May 1990, pp. 832-835, vol. 2, IEEE, Dallas, Texas. |
Deminco, N., Propagation Prediction Techniques and Antenna Modeling (150 to 1750 kHz) for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Broadcast Applications, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Aug. 2000, pp. 9-34, vol. 42, No. 4. |
Eckert, R. P., History of Ground Wave Propagation Prediction Curves for AM Standard Broadcast, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Mar. 1986, pp. 1-4, vol. BC-32, No. 1. |
Epstein, P., Radio-Wave Propagation and Electromagnetic Surface Waves, Proc. National Academy of Sciences, Jun. 1947, pp. 195-199, vol. 33, No. 6. |
Epstein, P., On the Possibility of Electromagnetic Surface Waves, Proc. National Academy of Sciences, Dec. 1954, pp. 1158-1165, vol. 40, No. 12. |
Norton, K. A., The Physical Reality of Space and Surface Waves in the Radiation Field of Radio Antennas, Proceedings of the IRE, Sep. 1937, pp. 1192-1202, vol. 25, No. 9. |
Goubau, G., Single Conductor Surface Wave Transmission Lines, Proc. IRE, Jun. 1951, pp. 619-624, vol. 39, No. 6. |
Norton, K.A., The Propagation of Radio Waves over the Surface of the Earth and in the Upper Atmosphere: Part II The Propagation from Vertical, Horizontal, and Loop Antennas Over a Plane Earth of Finite Conductivity, Proceedings of the IRE, Sep. 1937, pp. 1203-1236, vol. 25, No. 9. |
Hately et al., CFA: Working Assumption, Electronics World + Wireless World, Dec. 1990, pp. 1094-1099, vol. 96. |
Hill et al., Excitation of the Zenneck Surface Wave by a Vertical Aperture, Radio Science, Nov.-Dec. 1978, pp. 969-977, vol. 13, No. 6. |
Kabbary et al., Maxwell's Equations and the Crossed-Field Antenna, Electronics World + Wireless World, Mar. 1989, pp. 216-218, vol. 95. |
Trainotti et al., Short Low and Medium Frequency Antenna Performance, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Oct. 2005, pp. 66-90, vol. 47, No. 5. |
Kabbary et al., Four Egyptian MW Broadcast Crossed-Field Antennas, Proceedings of the National Association of Broadcasters 1999 Engineering Conference, Apr. 1999, pp. 235-241, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
Kahan et al., On the Existence of a Surface Wave in Dipole Radiation over a Plane Earth, Proc. IRE, Jul. 1950, pp. 807-812, vol. 38, No. 7. |
Karbowiak, A. E., Theory of Composite Guides: Stratified Guides for Surface Waves, Proc. IEE (British), 1954, pp. 238-242, vol. 101, No. 72. |
Tesla, N., The True Wireless, Electrical Experimenter, May 1919, pp. 1-13. |
King et al., Groundwave Attenuation Function for Propagation Over a Highly Inductive Earth, Radio Science, Jul. 1967, pp. 687-693, vol. 2, No. 7. |
Li, R., The Accuracy of Norton's Empirical Approximations for Ground Wave Attenuation, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, Jul. 1983, pp. 624-628, vol. AP-31, No. 4. |
Lindell et al., Exact Image Theory for the Sommerfeld Half-Space Problem, Part I: Vertical Magnetic Dipole, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Feb. 1984, pp. 126-133, vol. AP-32, No. 2. |
Lindell et al., Exact Image Theory for the Sommerfeld Half-Space Problem, Part II: Vertical Electric Dipole, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Aug. 1984, pp. 841-847, vol. AP-32, No. 8. |
Lindell et al., Exact Image Theory for the Sommerfeld Half-Space Problem, Part III: General Formulation, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Oct. 1984, pp. 1027-1032, vol. AP-32, No. 10. |
Lodge et al., Syntonic Wireless Telegraphy; with Specimens of Large-scale Measurements, Proceedings of the Royal Society—London, Series A, May 26, 1909, pp. 227-256, vol. 82, No. 554. |
Marincic, A. S., Nikola Tesla and the Wireless Transmission of Energy, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Oct. 1982, pp. 4064-4068, vol. PAS-101, No. 10. |
Mason, H. F., The Nodal Point Explained, QST, Sep. 1923, pp. 11-14. |
Norton, K. A., The Calculation of Ground-Wave Field Intensity Over a Finitely Conducting Spherical Earth, Proceedings of the IRE, Dec. 1941, pp. 623-639, vol. 29, No. 12. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047344 filed on Aug. 17, 2016, International Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2017. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047676 filed on Aug. 19, 2016, International Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2017. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047672 filed on Aug. 19, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/046488 filed on Aug. 11, 2016, International Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047674 filed on Aug. 19, 2016, International Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047167 filed on Aug. 16, 2016, International Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047375 filed on Aug. 17, 2016, International Search Report dated Dec. 2, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047599 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 23, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047673 filed on Aug. 19, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 29, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047446 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047353 filed on Aug. 17, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047170 filed on Aug. 16, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047611 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047455 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047452 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Leonhard, W., Electrical Engineering Between Energy and Information, Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, 2000. Proceedings. PI EMC 2000. The Third International August 15-18, 2000, IEEE, vol. 1, Aug. 15, 2000, pp. 197-202, Piscataway, NJ, USA. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047451 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US16/47986 filed on Aug. 22, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047954 filed on Aug. 22, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 24, 2016. |
Zoran, B. et al, Some Notes on Transmission Line Representations of Tesla's Transmitters, 16th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, Softcom 2008, IEEE. Sep. 25, 2008, pp. 60-69, Piscataway. NJ, USA. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047957 filed on Aug. 22, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/048314 filed on Aug. 24, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047675 filed on Aug. 19, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 25, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047955 filed on Aug. 22, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047457 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search and Written Opinion dated Nov. 18, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047368 filed on Aug. 17, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047338 filed on Aug. 17, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047598 filed on Aug. 18, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 3, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2015/049236 filed on Sep. 9, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2015/049511 filed on Sep. 10, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 5, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2015/049523 filed on Sep. 10, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 7, 2016. |
Patent Application PCT/US2015/049497 filed on Sep. 10, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2015. |
Patent Application PCT/US2015/049520 filed on Sep. 10, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 15, 2016. |
Rich, G. J., The Launching of a Plane Surface Wave, Proceedings of the IEEE—Part B: Radio and Electronic Engineering, Mar. 1, 1955, pp. 237-246, vol. 102, No. 2, US. |
Ranfagni, A. et al, Observation of Zenneck-type Waves in Microwave Propagation Experiments, Journal of Applied Physics, Jul. 2006, pp. 024910-1-024910-5, vol. 100, No. 2, US. |
Mahmoud, S. F. et al, Reflection of Surface Waves on a Dialectric Image Line with Application to ‘Guide RADAR’, Microwave Symposium, 1972 IEEE GMTT International, May 22, 1972, pp. 139-141, Piscataway, NJ, US. |
Examination Report issued in New Zealand Application No. 720048 dated May 12, 2017. |
Examination Report issued in New Zealand Application No. 720048 dated Jan. 25, 2017. |
Patent Application PCT/US2016/047350 filed on Aug. 17, 2016, International Search Report dated Mar. 9, 2017. |
Patent Application PCT/US2015/049171 filed on Sep. 9, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 16, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/047677 dated Oct. 18, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/047956 dated Oct. 21, 2016. |
Wu, Ke et al., Wireless Power Transmission, Technology, and Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1271-1275, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Massa, Andrea et al., Array Designs for Long-Distance Wireless Power Transmission: State-of-the-Art and Innovative Solutions, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1464-1481, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Norton, K. A., The Propagation of Radio Waves Over the Surface of the Earth and in the Upper Atmosphere: Part I Ground-Wave Propagation from Short Antennas, Proc. IRE, Oct. 1936, pp. 1367-1387, vol. 24, No. 10. |
Shinohara, Naoki, Beam Control Technologies with a High-Efficiency Phased Array for Microwave Power Transmission in Japan, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1448-1463, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Miyakoshi, Junji, Cellular and Molecular Responses to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1494-1502, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Kim, Jiseong et al., Coil Design and Shielding Methods for a Magnetic Resonant Wireless Power Transfer System, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1332-1342, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Shoki, Hiroki, Issues and Initiatives for Practical Deployment of Wireless Power Transfer Technologies in Japan, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1312-1320, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Covic, Grant A. et al., Inductive Power Transfer, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1276-1289, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Strassner, Bernd et al., Microwave Power Transmission: Historical Milestones and System Components, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1379-1396, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Christ, Andreas et al., Assessing Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Wireless Power Transmission Systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1482-1493, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Jaffe, Paul et al., Energy Conversion and Transmission Modules for Space Solar Power, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1424-1437, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Tesla, Nikola, The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires, Electrical World & Engineer, Mar. 5, 1904, pp. 429-431. |
Hui, S. Y., Planar Wireless Charging Technology for Portable Electronic Products and Qi, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1290-1301, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Sasaki, Susumu et al., Microwave Power Transmission Technologies for Solar Power Satellites, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1438-1447, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Wang, Bingnan et al., Wireless Power Transfer: Metamaterials and Array of Coupled Resonators, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1359-1368, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Sample, Alanson P. et al., Enabling Seamless Wireless Power Delivery in Dynamic Environments, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1343-1358, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Visser, Hubregt J. et al., RF Energy Harvesting and Transport for Wireless Sensor Network Applications: Principles and Requirements, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1410-1423, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Popovic, Zoya et al., Low-Power Far-Field Wireless Powering for Wireless Sensors, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1397-1409, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Mayordomo, Iker et al., An Overview of Technical Challenges and Advances of Inductive Wireless Power Transmission, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1302-1311, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Garnica, Jaime et al., Wireless Power Transmission: From Far Field to Near Field, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1321-1331, vol. 101, No. 6. |
Ho, John S. et al., Midfield Wireless Powering for Implantable Systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1369-1378, vol. 101, No. 6. |
O'Neill, John J., Prodigal Genius: The Life of Nikola Tesla, 2008, pp. 121-217, Adventures Unlimited Press, Kempton, Illinois. |
Cheney, Margaret, Tesla: Man Out of Time, 1981, pp. 171-191, Touchstone, New York, NY. |
Burrows, C. R., The Surface Wave in Radio Transmission, Bell Laboratories Record, Jun. 1937, pp. 321-324, vol. 15. |
Valone, Thomas, Harnessing the Wheelwork of Nature, Tesla's Science of Energy, 2002, pp. 147-269, Adventures Unlimited Press, Kempton, Illinois. |
Tesla, Nikola, My Inventions, The Autobiography of Nikola Tesla, 2013, pp. 61-72, Lexington, KY. |
Tesla, Nikola, From Colorado Springs to Long Island, Research Notes: Colorado Springs 1899-1900 New York 1900-1901, 2008, Nikola Tesla Museum. |
McMichael, I., A Note on the Brewster Angle in Lossy Dielectric Media, Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, Oct. 2010, pp. 1-11, US Army RDECOM CERDEC NVESD, Fort Belvior, Virginia. |
Karalis, A., et al., Efficient Wireless Non-radiative Mid-range Energy Transfer, Annals of Physics, 2008, pp. 34-48, No. 323, Elsevier, Inc. (also made available online on Apr. 27, 2007). |
Wadsworth, D., Approximate Integration Methods Applied to Wave Propagation (Thesis), Department of Geology and Geophysics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Thesis Submitted in Feb. 1958, pp. 1-128, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. |
Pover, B., Report on the Performance of the Silsden 8 Metre Crossed Field Antenna, Published on the Internet at ok1mjo.com/all/ostatni/t-dab_dvb-t . . . /CFA_antena_silsden-report.pdf, Oct. 2009, pp. 1-28. |
Corum, J. et al., The Application of Transmission Line Resonators to High Voltage RF Power Processing: History, Analysis and Experiment, IEEE 19th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Mar. 1987, pp. 45-50, Held at Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States. |
Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2014/019477, International Publication No. WO 2014/137817, entitled Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Waves on Lossy Media, International Publication dated Sep. 12, 2014, International Filing Date: Feb. 28, 2014. |
Wait, J. R., Excitation of Surface Waves on Conducting, Stratified, Dielectric-clad and Corrugated Surfaces, Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Dec. 1957, pp. 365-377, vol. 59, No. 6. |
Marincic, A. S., Nikola Tesla and the Wireless Transmission of Energy, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Oct. 1982, pp. 58-59, vol. PAS-101, No. 10, IEEE, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. |
Valentinuzzi, M.E., Nikola Tesla: Why Was He So Much Resisted and Forgotten?, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Jul./Aug. 1998, pp. 74-75, vol. 17, No. 4, IEEE, Inst. de Bioingenieria, Univ. Nacional de Tucuman, Mexico. |
Leyh, G.E. et al., Efficient Wireless Transmission of Power Using Resonators with Coupled Electric Fields, Power Symposium, 2008. NAPS '08. 40th North American, pp. 1-4, IEEE, Nevada Lightning Lab., NV, USA. |
Marincic, A. et al., Tesla's Contribution to Radiowave Propagation, Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Service, Sep. 2001, pp. 327-331, vol. 1, IEEE, Belgrade, Serbia. |
Garnica, J. et al., Wireless Power Transmission: From Far Field to Near Field, Proceedings of the IEEE, Apr. 4, 2013, pp. 1321-1331, vol. 101, No. 6, IEEE, Gainesville, FL, USA. |
Poljak, D. et al., Full Wave Model versus Transmission Line Representation of Tesla's Wave Propagation: 155th Anniversary of Birth of Nikola Tesla, 2011 19th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), Sep. 15-17, 2011, pp. 1-5, IEEE, Split, Croatia. |
Li, Joshua Le-Wei et al., Keynote Speakers: Wireless Power Transfer: From Long-Distance Transmission to Short-Range Charging, 2013 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference (RFM), Dec. 9-11, 2013, IEEE, Penang, Malaysia. |
Keller, J. B. et al., Surface Waves Excitation and Propagation, Journal of Applied Physics, Jun. 1960, pp. 1039-1046, vol. 31, No. 6., AIP Publishing. |
Chu, L. J., Physical Limitations on Omni-Directional Antennas, Journal of Applied Physics, Dec. 1948, pp. 1163-1175, vol. 19, AIP Publishing. |
Wise, W. H., Note on Dipole Radiation Theory, Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 1933, pp. 354-358, vol. 4, AIP Publishing. |
Van Der Pol, B., Theory of the Reflection of the Light from a Point Source by a Finitely Conducting Flat Mirror, with an Application to Radiotelegraphy, Physica, Aug. 1935, pp. 843-853, vol. 2. |
Friedman, B., Excitation of Surface Waves, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Jan. 1958, pp. 252-258, Monograph No. 277 R. |
Kabbary, F. M., Extremely Small High Power MW Broadcasting Antennas, IEE International Broadcasting Convention, Sep. 12-16, 1997, Conference Publication No. 447, Amsterdam. |
Jordan, E. C. et al., Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems, Second Edition, 1968, pp. 558-560, 730-734, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. |
Smythe, W. R., Static and Dynamic Electricity, 1950, pp. 542-547, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,525, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,525, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Response to Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,525, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,525, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Response to Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,525, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/053242 dated Jan. 25, 2016. |
Examination Report issued in New Zealand Application No. 712566 dated Nov. 30, 2015. |
Office Action Issued in Chilean Application No. 2506-2015 dated Sep. 29, 2016. (Partial English Translation included). |
“Wireless Transmission Theory, the Tesla Effect,” Tesla Radio, Dec. 23, 2011, pp. 1-6. |
Peterson, Gary, “Comparing the Hertz-Wave and Tesla Wireless Systems,” Feedline, Oct. 27, 2012, pp. 1-7, 9, 21st Century Books, Breckenridge, CO. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/035598 dated Sep. 11, 2015. |
Examination Report issued in Australian Application No. 2014226221 dated Sep. 22, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,538, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,538, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Response to Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,538, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,538, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Response to Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,538, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2016. |
Hill, et. al. “On the excitation of the Zenneck surface wave over the ground at 1OHz,” May 1980, Ann ales des Telecommunications, vol. 35, Issue 5, pp. 179-182. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,525, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Response to Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2016. |
Peterson, Gary, “Rediscovering the zenneck surface wave,” Feb. 8, 2008, Feedline No. 4, 1-5. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,492, filed Jun. 2, 2015, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,507, filed Jun. 2, 2015, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2017. |
Zenneck, J., Wireless Telegraphy, Mar. 1918, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, NY, USA. (submitted in 2 parts). |
Hendry, J. Surface Waves: what Are They? Why Are They Interesting?, Roke Manor Research Limited, 2009, pp. 1-10, Romsey, England. |
Turner, J., Isolation of the Zenneck Surface Wave: Update, Roke Manor Research Limited, Romsey, England. |
Schelkunoff, S. A., Modified Sommerfeld's Integral and Its Applications, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Oct. 1936, pp. 1388-1398, vol. 24, No. 10, IEEE, New York, NY, USA. |
Wells, C.B., CFA Experiments, Electronics World + Wireless World, Mar. 1990, pp. 253-255, vol. 96. |
Hells, C.B., The Cross-Field Antenna in Practice, Electronics World + Wireless World, Nov. 1989, pp. 1109-1111, vol. 95. |
Wait, J.R., Theory of Ground Wave Propagation, Electromagnetic Probing in Geophysics, 1971, pp. 163-207, Golem Press. |
Sarkar et al., History of Wireless, Jan. 17, 2006, Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ, USA. (submitted in 4 parts). |
Stark III, J.C., Wireless Power Transmission Utilizing a Phased Array of Tesla Coils (Master's Thesis), May 13, 2004, pp. 1-247, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. (submitted in 2 parts). |
Hardesty et al., Electrical Storms in Tesla's Colorado Springs Notes (& the Transmission of Energy w/o Wires), Tesla Science Center Conference, Nov. 5, 2011, Long Island, NY, USA. (Power Point Presentation). |
Corum et al., A Technical Analysis of the Extra Coil as a Slow Wave Helical Resonator, Proceedings of the 2nd International Tesla Symposium, 1986, pp. 2-1 to 2-24, International Tesla Society, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. |
Corum et al., Dr. Mahlon Loomis: Terra Alta's Neglected Discoverer of RF Communication, Proceedings of the 1992 International Tesla Symposium, pp. 19-34, International Tesla Society, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. |
Corum et al., Summary Notes on Tesla Coils, Tesla Conference 2011, Published as Appendix 8 in Electrical Storms in Tesla's Colorado Springs Notes and the Transmission of Energy Without Wires, Nov. 5, 2011, pp. 1-14, Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyffe, Shoreham, NY, USA. |
Hardesty et al., Franklin—Loomis—Tesla: The Origin and Development of Wireless Technology, Tesla Science Foundation Conference, Jul. 9-11, 2010, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (Power Point Presentation). |
Hardesty et al., Franklin—Loomis—Tesla: The Origin of Modern Wireless Phenomena, Tesla Science Foundation Conference, Jul. 9-11, 2010, pp. 1-99, Philadelphia, PA, USA. |
Corum et al., Goodness, Q and Power Factor in Electrical Science and Machinery, Infinite Energy Magazine, Jan./Feb. 2010, pp. 1-17, vol. 15, No. 89, New Energy Foundation, Concord, NH, USA. |
Marriott, R. H., How Radio Grew Up, Radio Broadcast, Dec. 1925, pp. 159-162, vol. VIII, No. 2, Doubleday, Page & Co., Garden City, NY, USA. |
Goubau, G., Úber die Zennecksche Bodenwelle (on the Zenneeck Surface Wave), Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Physik, 1951, pp. 103-107, vol. 3, No. 3/4, as translated by James F. Corum. |
Pinzone, B.F., Pinzone Antiskywave Design, Radio World, May 15, 1988, pp. 45-46. |
Corum et al., Experimental Replication of Loomis' RF Experiments, AAPT Summer Meeting, Jul. 24, 2006, Syracuse, NY, USA. (Power Point Presentation). |
Corum et al., Tesla Coil Research, U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center, Contract No. DAAA21-90-C-0084, Jun. 1992. |
Lebo, J.R., The Man Before Marconi: A Biography of Dr. Mahlon Loomis, QST, Aug. 1948, pp. 42-44. |
Hinters, S.R., The Story of Mahlon Loomis: Pioneer of Radio, Radio News, Nov. 1922, pp. 836-837, 966-980. |
Kogan, S.H., Distribution of Waves Along an Infinite Helix, Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1949, pp. 1-5, vol. 66, No. 5, as translated by P.J. Pesavento and E. Corum. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/849,643, filed Sep. 10, 2015, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2017. |
Niessen, K.F., Zur Entscheidung zwischen den Beiden Sommerfeldschen Formeln für die Fortpflanzeng von Drahtlosen Wellen, Ann. der Physik, 1937, pp. 585-596, vol. 29 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Niessen, K.F., Über die Entferntun Raumwellen eines vertikalen Dipolesenders oberhalb einer ebenen Erde von beliebiger Dielektrizitätskonstante und beliebiger Lightfähigkeit, Ann. der Physik, Dec. 24, 1933, pp. 893-912, Series 5, vol. 18 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Niessen, K.F., Bemerkung zu einer Arbeit von Murry und einer Arbeit von van der Pol und Niessen uber die Ausbreitung elektromagnitischen Wellen, Ann. der Physik, Apr. 3, 1933, pp. 810-820, Series 5, vol. 16 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Hack, F., Die Ausbreitung ebener elektromagnetischer Wellen längs eines geschrichteten Leiters, besonders in den Fällen der drahtlosen Telegraphie, Annallen der Physik, 1908, pp. 43-63, vol. 27 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
True, H, Über die Erdström in der Nähe einer Sendeantenne für drahtlose Telegraphie,Jahrbuch der drahtlose Telegraphie und Telephonie, Feb. 1911, pp. 125-175, vol. 5, No. 2 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Van Der Pol et al., Über die Ausbreitung Elektromagnetischer Wellen üeber eine Ebene Erde, Ann. der Physik, Aug. 22, 1930, pp. 273-294, Ser. 5, vol. 6 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Van Der Pol, B., Über die Ausbreitung Elektromagnetischer Wellen, Jahrbuch für Drahtlosen Telegraphie und Telephonie, Apr. 1931, pp. 152-156, vol. 37 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Zenneck, J., “Über die Fortpflanzung ebener elektromagnetischer Wellen längs einer ebenen Leiterfläche und ihre Beziehung zur drahtlosen Telegraphie,” (On the propagation of plane electromagnetic waves along a flat conducting surface and their relation to wireless telegraphy), Annalen der Physik, Sep. 20, 1907, pp. 846-866, Serial 4, vol. 23 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Sommerfeld, A., Uber die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der Drahtlosen Telegraphie, Annalen der Physik, 1909, pp. 665-737, vol. 28, No. 4 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Weyl, H., Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer Wellen über einem ebenen Leiter (Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves Over a Plane Conductor), Annalen der Physik, Nov. 1919, pp. 97-109, vol. 60 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Sommerfeld, A., Ausbreitung der Wellen in der Drahtlosen Telegraphie. Einfluss der Bodenbeschaffenheit auf gerichtete und un gerichtete Wellenzuge, Jahrbuch der drahtlose Telegraphie und Telephonie, Dec. 1910, pp. 157-176 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Van Der Pol et al., Über die Raum Wellen von einem vertikalen Dipolesender auf Ebene Erde, Ann. der Physik, Jul. 21, 1931, pp. 485-510, Ser. 5, vol. 10 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Sommerfeld, A., Uber die Fortplfanzung elektrodynamischer Wellen längs eines Drahtes, Annalen der Physik, 1899, pp. 233-290, vol. 67 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Sommerfeld, A., Uber die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der Drahtlosen Telegraphie, Annalen der Physik, Dec. 1926, pp. 1135-1153, vol. 81 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Weyl, H., Erwiderung auf Herrn Sommerfelds Bemerkungen über die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der drahtlosen Telegraphie, Annalen der Physik, 1920, pp. 110-112, vol. 62 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Sommerfeld, A., Uber die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der Drahtlosen Telegraphi, Annalen der Physik, 1920 , pp. 95-96, vol. 367, No. 9 (Includes English Translation and German Original). |
Peterson, G., The Application of Electromagnetic Surface Waves to Wireless Energy Transfer, 2015 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), May 1, 2015, pp. 1-4, Shoreham, Long Island, New York, USA. |
Kukushkin, A. V., On the Existence and Physical Meaning of the Zenneck Wave, UFN, 2009, vol. 179, No. 7, 801-803. |
Kistovich, Yu. V., On the Possibility of Observing Surface Zenneck Waves in the Radiation of a Source with a Small Vertical Aperture, Journal of Technical Physics, 1989, vol. 59(4), 16-21. |
Datsko, V.N. and A.A. Kopylov, On Surface Electromagnetic Waves, UFN, 2008, vol. 178, No. 1, 109-110. |
Baybakov et al., Experimental Discovery of Zenneck's Surface Electromagnetic Waves, UFN, 1989, vol. 157, 722-724. |
Hesse et al., A Single Probe Spatial Averaging Technique for Guided Waves and Its Application to Surface Wave Rail Inspection, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 54, No. 11, Nov. 2007, 2344-2356. |
Andriyas, T., Surface Wave Propagation in a Dielectric Waveguide Loaded with an Anistropic, Conductive, and Spatially Dispersive Substrate, Utah State University, May 2009, p. 12. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,089, filed Sep. 10, 2014, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,507, filed Jun. 2, 2015, Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017. |
Beaty, W., Tesla's Big Mistake?, Sep. 1999, http://amasci.com/tesla/tmistk.html. |
Anonymous, Tesla Wireless Technology, Mar. 8, 2007, http://montalk.net/notes/tesla-wireless-technology. |
Examination Report issued in Australian Application No. 2014226221 dated Sep. 20, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,653, filed Sep. 9, 2015, Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2017. |
Wolff, Christian, “Over the Horizon Oceanography Radar WERA,” Oct. 13, 2011, https://web.archive.org/web/20111013010047/http:/www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/karte712.en.html. |
Kume, Hideyoshi, “Dengyo Converts Microwave Into Electricity with High Efficiency,” Nikkei Electronics, May 17, 2011, http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20110517/191846/. |
Examination Report issued in New Zealand Application No. 712566 dated Jun. 10, 2016. |
Examination Report issued in New Zealand for Application No. 720048 dated Jun. 28, 2016. |
Fujimoto et al., Small Antennas, Research Studies Press, 1987, p. 4. |
Corum et al., Class Notes: Tesla Coils and the Failure of Lumped-Element Circuit Theory, published on the World Wide Web at http://www.teslatechnologyresearch.com/corum/, 1999. |
Corum et al., RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes, Microwave Review, Sep. 2001, pp. 36-45. |
Burrows, Charles R., The Surface Wave in Radio Propagation, Proceedings of the Radio Club of America, Aug. 1937, pp. 15-18, vol. 14, No. 2. |
Burrows, Charles R., The History of Radio Wave Propagation Up to the End of World War I, Proceedings of the IRE, May 1962, pp. 682-684, vol. 50, Issue 5. |
Wolff, Edward A., Antenna Analysis, 1966, p. 33, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Vogler, L.E., A Note on the Attenuation Function for Propagation Over a Flat Layered Ground, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Mar. 1964, pp. 240-242, vol. AP-12, No. 2. |
Banos, A., Dipole Radiation in the Presence of a Conducting Half-Space, 1966, pp. 148-158, Pergamon Press. |
Barlow et al., Radio Surface Waves, 1962, pp. 1-5, 10-12, 29-33, Oxford University Press. |
Brainerd et al., Ultra High Frequency Techniques, 1942, pp. 477-480, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York. |
Bronwell et al., Theory and Application of Microwaves, 1947, pp. 384-387, 390, McGraw-Hill. |
Clemmow, P.C., The Plane Wave Spectrum Representation of Electromagnetic Fields, 1966, pp. 30-31, Pergamon Press. |
Collin, R.E., Field Theory of Guided Waves, 1960, pp. 453-454, McGraw-Hill. |
Collin et al., Electromagnetic Fields, Antenna Theory—Part 1, 1969, p. 18, vol. 7, McGraw-Hill. |
Collin, R.E., Antennas and Radiowave Propagation, 1985, pp. 377-385, McGraw-Hill. |
Everitt et al., Communication Engineering, 3rd edition, 1956, p. 407, McGraw-Hill. |
Felsen et al., Radiation and Scattering of Waves, 1973, pp. 506-513, 554-559, Prentice-Hall. |
Friedman, B., Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics, 1956, pp. 213-214, 283-286, 290, 298-300, Wiley. |
Hansen, R.C., Electrically Small, Superdirective, and Superconducting Antennas, 2006, pp. 62-64, Wiley Interscience. |
Hansen et al., Small Antenna Handbook, 2011, pp. 147-150, Wiley, New Jersey. |
Harrington, R.F., Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields, 1961, pp. 460-463, McGraw-Hill. |
Ishimaru, A., Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation and Scattering, 1991, pp. 456-461, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. |
Wise, W.H., The Grounded Condenser Antenna Radiation Formula, Proc. IRE, Sep. 1931, pp. 1684-1689, vol. 19, No. 9. |
Kraus, J.D., Antennas, 1950, pp. 33-34, 452-453, 461-463, McGraw-Hill. |
Wise, W.H., Asymptotic Dipole Radiation Formulas, Bell System Technical Journal, Oct. 1929, pp. 662-671, vol. 8. |
Ramo et al., Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics, 3rd Edition, 1994, pp. 435-437, Wiley. |
Ryder, J.D., Networks, Lines and Fields, 1949, pp. 422-425, Prentice Hall, New York. |
Reich et al., Microwave Theory and Techniques, 1953, pp. 291-293, Van Nostrand. |
Sarbacher et al., Hyper and Ultrahigh Frequency Engineering, 1943, pp. 201-202, Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Schelkunoff, S.A., Electromagnetic Waves, 1943, pp. 49, 428-437, Van Nostrand Company, New York. |
Tesla, N., The Problem of Increasing Human Energy with Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun's Energy, The Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine, Jun. 1900, pp. 1-35. |
Van Der Pol, B., On Discontinuous Electromagnetic Waves and the Occurrence of a Surface Wave, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Jul. 1956, pp. 288-293, vol. AP-4. |
Eckert, Robert P., Modern Methods for Calculating Ground-Wave Field Strength Over a Smooth Spherical Earth, Report to the Federal Communications Division, Feb. 1986. |
Wait et al., Radiation from a Vertical Dipole over a Stratified Ground (Part II), IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Oct. 1954, pp. 144-146, vol. AP-3, No. 4. |
Tesla, N., From Colorado Springs to Long Island, Nikola Tesla Museum, 2008, pp. 485, 487, Nikola Tesla Museum. |
Cross et al., An Advanced VHF/UHF Short Range, Groundwave Propagation Model for Paths with Near-Earth Antennas, MegaWave Corporation, Nov. 1, 2006, Boylston, MA. |
Tyras, G., Radiation and Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves, 1969, pp. 33-36, Academic Press. |
Wait, J.R., Wave Propagation Theory, 1981, pp. 67-75, 117-127, Pergamon Press. |
Wait, J.R., Electromagnetic Wave Theory, 1985, pp. 254-259, Harper and Row, Publishers, New York. |
Wait, J.R., Electromagnetic Waves in Stratified Media, 1996, pp. 8-10, IEEE Press, Reprint from 1962 edition, Pergamon Press. |
Hessel, A., General Characteristics of Traveling-Wave Antennas, Antenna Theory—Part 2, Chapter 19, Appendix B, 1969, pp. 238-241, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. |
Sarkar et al., Electromagnetic Macro Modeling of Propagation in Mobile Wireless Communication: Theory and Experiment, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Dec. 2012, pp. 17-43, vol. 54, No. 6. |
Wait, Jr., Characteristics of Antennas over Lossy Earth, Antenna Theory—Part 2, Chapter 23, 1969, pp. 386-391, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. |
Wait, Jr., Theory of Ground Wave Propagation, Electromagnetic Probing in Geophysics, Chapter 5, 1971, pp. 163-172, 204-207, Golem Press, Boulder, Colorado. |
Smith, M.S., Conventional Explanation for Crossed-Field Antenna, Electronics Letters, Feb. 13, 1992, pp. 360-361, vol. 28, No. 4. |
Tesla, N., The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires as a Means of Furthering Peace, Electrical World and Engineer, Jan. 7, 1905, pp. 21-24. |
Wait et al., Excitation of the HF Surface Wave by Vertical and Horizontal Antennas, Radio Science, Sep.-Oct. 1979, pp. 767-780, vol. 14, No. 5. |
Wait, Jr., A Note on Surface Waves and Ground Waves, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Nov. 1965, pp. 996-997, vol. AP-13. |
Nikola Tesla, Nikola Tesla on His Work With Alternating Currents and Their Application to Wireless Telegraphy, Telephony, and Transmission of Power, 2002, pp. 1-240, Twenty First Century Books, Breckenridge, Colorado. |
Tesla, N., Colorado Springs Notes: 1899-1900, 1978, pp. 1-437, Nolit, Beograd, Yugoslavia. |
Singh A. K. et al., Excitation of surface electromagnetic waves on water, App Optics, Nov. 1, 1978, pp. 3459-3465, vol. 17, No. 21. |
Olivier Balosso et al., Brief overview about Surface Wave theory and applications, 2012 15th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (Antem), Jun. 25, 2012, pp. 1-7, IEEE. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/035598 dated Jul. 21, 2014. |
Menelle M et al., Full digital high frequency surface wave radar: French trials in the Biscay bay, 2008 International Conference on RADAR, Sep. 2, 2008, pp. 224-229, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA. |
J. O. Hinz et al., A MIMO FMCW radar approach to HFSWR, Advances in Radio Science: ARS, Jul. 29, 2011, pp. 159-163, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/9/159/2011/ars-9-159-2011.pdf (retrieved on Dec. 4, 2015), Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany. |
Guohua Wang et al., High Resolution MIMO-HFSWR Radar Using Sparse Frequency Waveforms, Wireless Sensor Network, Oct. 1, 2009, pp. 152-162, vol. 1, No. 3. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049505 dated Dec. 14, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049394 dated Dec. 14, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049064 dated Dec. 11, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049509 dated Dec. 18, 2015. |
H. M. Barlow et al., Surface Waves, Proceedings of the IRE, Nov. 1, 1953, pp. 329-341, vol. 100, No. 68, US. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049171 dated Dec. 16, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049435 dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049424 dated Dec. 18, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049151 dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049161 dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049518 dated Dec. 18, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049154 dated Dec. 15, 2015. |
Hambling, David, “Skimming the Surface: The Return of Tesla's Surface Waves”, Published by Popular Mechanics on the Internet at http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a8778/ skimming-the-surface-the-return-of-teslas-surface-waves-15322250/, Apr. 8, 2013, Popular Mechanics. |
Barfield, R. H., “The Attenuation of Wireless Waves Over Land,” Journal of the I.E.E. (British), Jan. 1928, pp. 204-214, vol. 66. |
Michalski, K. A. et al., “The Sommerfeld half-space problem revisited: from radio frequencies and Zenneck waves to visible light and Fano modes,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Jan. 2016, pp. 1-42, vol. 30, No. 1, Taylor & Francis. |
Noether, F., “Spreading of Electric Waves Along the Earth,” published in the book translation Theory of Functions As Applied to Engineering Problems, Technology Press, 1942, pp. 167-184, Part 2, Section E, MIT. [Originally published by Springer, Berlin, in 1931 under the title Funktionentheorie and Ihre Anwendung in der Technik, Part II, R, Rothe, F. Ollendorf, and K. Pohlhausen, editors.]. |
Written Opinion in related, co-pending Singapore Application No. 11201701207Y dated Apr. 9, 2018. |
Mexican Office Action issued in Mexican Patent Office for Application No. MX/a/2017/003026 dated Jun. 11, 2018. |
Examination report issued in Australian Patent Office for Application No. 2015315218 dated Oct. 3, 2018, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180138719 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62048994 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14847606 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 15856362 | US |