With the advent of guns and firearms much effort has been devoted to their perfection in the art of firing projectiles to hit specified targets. An important factor relating to the firing of a gun is the hit probability of the weapon.
A shotgun increases the hit probability by firing multiple projectiles in a random dispersion. An automatic weapon increases the hit probability by firing a random dispersion of projectiles toward a target, thereby covering a broad area around a target and assuring a greater chance of striking the target. Multiple projectiles can be fired simultaneously from a rifle or handgun to increase the hit probability of the weapon.
Much of the prior art for multiple projectile segment cartridges that fire multiple projectiles simultaneously from a single cartridge is from the late 1800's. Nolan (U.S. Pat. No. 221,249 Filed November 1879) uses a multiple projectile segment projectile. Most of the projectile segments that are side by side are held together temporarily after firing by “caps with spurs”, “or soldering” on the forward pointed end, and a “beveled flange” on the aft end. The width of the dispersion is regulated somewhat by the deceleration of the projectile and the resulting force between the forward segments and the aft full caliber projectile segment which separate in flight. “The projectile can be used in either muzzle loading or breech loading arms . . . ”
Rice (U.S. Pat. No. 216,974 Filed July 1879) uses a multiple projectile segment cartridge where pointed projectile segments are side by side. However, Rice apparently uses a smooth bore gun. The cartridge has a “conical or equivalent opening left at the point” and the projectile segments “move in different courses because of their particular shape and because of the action of the air, which spreads them apart as they are shot through it.”
Both of these patents are similar to the applicant's invention, in that multiple projectile segment are fired. However the methods used in these patents, such as “caps with spurs” or “conical or equivalent opening left at the point,” will not fire the projectile segments in accurate repeatable symmetrical patterns compared to the applicant's invention, or be as efficient in hitting the target with projectile segments that retain their velocity, and have a high sectional density because they are spinning around their fore and aft axis, which causes significantly higher terminal effects.
In 1952 a report for the U.S. Army by the Operations Research Office “Operational Requirements for an Infantry Hand Weapon” analyzed firing a salvo of 5 projectiles in a diamond shaped pattern, and found the concept would greatly increase the hit probability of a weapon. With the “pattern-dispersion principle” each projectile had a predetermined hit point in the dispersion, was separated from the other projectiles, and the diamond shaped salvo efficiently maximized the lethal area, and the hit probability of the dispersion. Graphs of the hit probability of the diamond shaped dispersion at different ranges and aiming errors, along probability tables that predicted the number of projectiles that would strike the target at a given range were included in the report.
Several multi-barreled weapons that fire projectiles simultaneously to form patterns were tested during Project Salvo (1952-1962). These weapons were discontinued after Project Salvo. These weapons failed to provide a solution to the long felt need of simultaneously firing a salvo of projectiles in a pattern.
The U.S. Army determined that the “pattern salvo weapon” or “dispersion weapon” would be very effective and recommended that the Ordinance Corp. proceed to develop a pattern salvo weapon for the Infantry. It was assumed that a weapon would be produced, and in “Operational Requirements” (pages 31-32) the “Basis of Issue” for the “dispersion weapon” that was recommended was “ . . . 7 in every 10 infantry hand weapons should have the characteristics desirable for short range use.” However a practical “dispersion weapon” that fired the 5 shot diamond shaped pattern was never developed.
This invention concerns taking a two projectile salvo and adding another two projectile salvo. The result is a four projectile segment cartridge that fires four projectile segments in a square salvo of projectiles at the target. The predetermined square salvo consists of four projectile segments that spin around the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment, and strike the target. The salvo greatly increases the hit probability of the dispersion when compared to a single shot. The symmetrical square salvo of projectiles is rotationally randomly oriented around the central aim point.
With the present invention 4 projectile segment square salvos with a random rotational orientation of the pattern can be fired from rifles and handguns at relatively short ranges to substantially increase the hit probability of the gun. All the projectile segments in the revolver cartridge spin around the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment after exiting the gun barrel.
In some cases graphite, or a thin disk of Teflon between the two projectile segments 3, and the two projectile segments 2, was found to promote the projectile segments to spin around the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment.
The energy available by firing a rifle, or a more powerful handgun, can be efficiently used by firing 4 projectile segments in a wide square pattern, to greatly increase the hit probability of the gun. A square salvo of projectile segments will compensate somewhat for imprecise aiming. Random rotational orientation of the 4 projectile segment square pattern is produced by firing the multi-projectile segment cartridges.
A wide square pattern can be fired from a rifle or handgun to substantially increase the hit probability of the weapon in defensive situations that necessarily require fast reactions. Rifles and handguns that are used for personal defense are fired with short target exposure times and large aiming errors.(1) The average aiming error for these short target exposure times can be taken into account, and an optimal dispersion in which the standard radial deviation of the dispersion is 50%-100% of the aiming error can be fired.(2)
Many rifles and handguns will fire salvos generally within this optimal dispersion. Hit probability increases for the pattern dispersion salvos vary widely with the number of projectiles in the salvo, range, and aiming error, but many rifles and handguns, fired quickly in a defensive situation, will have on the order of a 60%-100% or more increase in hit probability by firing a pattern dispersion salvo compared to firing a single shot.(3)
Handguns are difficult to fire effectively. (In a study over an 8 year period the N.Y. Police hit their target only 18% of the time in shooting situations.) Rand Report.
Footnote 1 “Rifle, Carbine, and Pistol Aiming Error as a Function of Target Exposure Time” 1955 report by the Operations Research Office for the U.S. Army.
Footnote 2 “Hit Probability on a Tank Type Target” 1966 report by the Frankford Arsenal. The report indicates the size of a dispersion to maximize the hit probability for a salvo of projectiles.
Footnote 3 “Operational Requirements for an Infantry Hand Weapon” has graphs of hit probabilities of a diamond shaped pattern dispersion salvo compared to one shot for several aiming errors. These graphs can be adjusted for the wider dispersions and shorter ranges of the present invention.
The invention represents a device and method for creating a symmetrical 4 projectile segment square pattern of projectile strikes on a target to increase the hit probability of a gun.
After firing, the four projectile segments will rotate around the central longitudinal axis of gun barrel 4. While on the central longitudinal axis of gun barrel 4 the four projectile segments will be rotating around an axis that coincides with the flat side surface of each projectile segment. Each of the projectile segments 3 will exit the end of gun barrel 4 where the axis of rotation of the two projectile segments 3 will change to the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment 3. The two projectile segments 3 will travel in a path that will strike the target on either side of the central aim point. The two projectile segments 2 will follow the two projectile segments 3 from the end of gun barrel 4, and the axis of rotation of the two projectile segments 2 will change to the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment 2. The two projectile segments 2 will strike the target in an orientation that is 90 degrees to the two projectile segment 3 projectiles. The result is a symmetrical square pattern of four projectile segment strikes on the target. The square pattern will be randomly rotationally oriented.
The projectile segments imprint a half moon shape on the target. The size of the pattern will depend on the twist of the barrel, the diameter of the projectile, and the range of the target.
A 44 Magnum revolver with a 1-20 twist will fire 4 90 grain projectile segments in an approximately 5¼ inch square pattern at 10 feet. The energy of the projectile segments from a 4 inch 44 Magnum is approximately 800 ft. lbs.
A 480 Ruger revolver with a 1-18 twist will fire 4 115 grain projectile segments in an approximately at 6½ inch square pattern at 10 feet.
A 545 Casull revolver will fire a powerful square salvo at 10 feet that is 5 inches square, and a 44 Magnum rifle with a 1-30 twist will fire a 3½ inch square pattern a 10 feet.
Top graph 39.5 MILS AIMING ERROR—Regular Soldier 1.4 sec. target exposure time
The 6 fold, and 20 fold reduction in misses on the target from the 2 graphs in
The square projectile segment salvos in the applicant's invention produces a significantly greater hit probability than the combined hit probability of two randomly oriented 2 projectile salvos.
Additionally, the arrangement of projectiles in the cartridge case permits a maximum weight of projectiles to be fired. The flat frontal area of the 4 projectiles or the melplats on the projectile is double the frontal area of a single projectile. The melplat is important for producing good terminal effects for the projectiles.
Four projectile segment ammunition is particularly well suited to revolvers since the cylinder shaped 2 projectile segments that are forward of the cartridge case can be easily loaded into the cylinder of a revolver.
The 4 projectile ammunition also feeds reasonably well in a lever action 44 Magnum rifle. The profile of the two forward projectile segments would have to be altered for use in semi-automatic weapons.
The cartridge case holds the two projectile salvos in a rotational orientation that can be varied but approximately 90 degrees is necessary for a square salvo. If the twist of the barrel is taken into account for a 44 Magnum revolver 81 degrees between the salvos is optimum. The pattern on the target will vary from a very symmetrical square pattern to a slightly rectangular pattern.
A 5 projectile square salvo pattern with a central projectile has an equal hit probability as the applicant's 4 projectile square salvo up to a 30 inch width for the salvo (Infantry Requirements). This 30 inch width is reached at 43 feet for a 4 projectile square salvo from a 44 Magnum revolver with a 1-20 twist. This range is approximately double that of the 7 yard average for handguns that are actually used in self defense.
The projectile segments that are side by side in the cartridge case spin around their the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment after leaving the gun barrel and continue to spin around their the central longitudinal axis of each projectile segment after striking ballistic gelatin(4), which allows them to penetrate at least 14 inches with a 44 magnum revolver. The number of revolutions of the projectile segments as they passed through the ballistic gelatin is easily observed through most of the projectile segment's path.
Footnote 4 The 10% gelatin that was used was substantially the same as ballistic gelatin that is commercially available.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/851,228, filed 2013, Mar. 4 by the present inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
90732 | Curtis | Jun 1869 | A |
122620 | Maduell | Jan 1872 | A |
RE4814 | Maduell | Mar 1872 | E |
216974 | Rice | Jul 1879 | A |
221249 | Nowlan | Nov 1879 | A |
588764 | Boss | Aug 1897 | A |
620875 | Baker | Mar 1899 | A |
1203649 | Papuga | Nov 1916 | A |
3097603 | Harper | Jul 1963 | A |
3146673 | Reed | Sep 1964 | A |
3855931 | Dardick | Dec 1974 | A |
7017495 | Sexton | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7845281 | Sexton | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8141493 | Kuchman | Mar 2012 | B1 |
9103640 | Sexton | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20130255526 | Sexton | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150053107 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61851228 | Mar 2013 | US |