The present invention generally relates to a moment resisting, beam-to-column joint connection structure, and more particularly to an all field-bolted dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure, and including an optional adjustable beam seat to facilitate alignment of bolt holes during erection of a moment resisting, beam-to-column joint connection structure.
It has been found in a moment-resisting building having a structural steel framework, that most of the energy of an earthquake, or other extreme loading condition, is absorbed and dissipated, in or near the beam-to-column joints of the building. Braced structural connection systems including a brace-to-column and brace-to-beam joint connection must also be capable of withstanding loads generated during an earthquake, or other extreme loading condition.
In the structural steel construction of moment-resisting buildings, towers, and similar structures, most commonly in the past, the flanges of beams were welded to the face of columns by full-penetration, single bevel, groove welds. Thus, the joint connection was comprised of highly-restrained welds connecting a beam between successive columns. Vertical loads, that is, the weight of the floors and loads superimposed on the floors, were and still are assumed by many to be carried by vertical shear tabs or pairs of vertical, structural angle irons arranged back-to-back, bolted or welded to the web of the beam and bolted or welded to the face of the column.
The greater part of the vertical load placed upon a beam was commonly assumed to be carried by a shear tab bolted or welded to the web of the beam and bolted or welded to the face of the flange of the column at each end of the beam. Through the use of parallel face-to-face gusset plates welded to the column, the entire vertical load is carried by the gusset plates.
Experience has shown that the practice of welding the beam's flanges directly to the column flange using full penetration, single bevel groove welds is uncertain and/or unsuitable for resistance to earthquakes, explosions, tornadoes and other disastrous events, and must rely on highly experience welders which severely limits its application to being used in only certain regions of the world where pre-qualified welding capability is readily available and/or is the preferred construction means of that region or particular industry. Such connection means and welding practice has resulted in sudden, fractured welds, the pulling of divots from the face of the column flange, cracks in the column flange and column web, and various other failures. Such highly-restrained welds do not provide a reliable mechanism for dissipation of earthquake energy, or other large forces, and can lead to brittle fracture of the weld and the column, particularly the flange of the column and the web of the column in the locality of the beam-to-column joint, (known as the “panel zone”).
It is desirable to achieve greater strength, ductility and joint rotational capacity in beam-to-column connections in order to make buildings less vulnerable to disastrous events. Greater connection strength, ductility and joint rotational capacity are particularly desirable in resisting sizeable moments. That is, the beam-to-column moment-resisting connections in a steel frame building can be subjected to large rotational demands due to interstory lateral building drift. Engineering analysis, design and full-scale specimen testing have determined that prior steel frame connection techniques can be substantially improved by strengthening the beam-to-column connection in a way which better resists and withstands the sizeable beam-to-column, joint rotations which are placed upon the beam and the column. That is, the beam-to-column connection must be a strong and ductile, moment-resisting connection.
The parallel gusset plates may also be configured to receive diagonal braces. Thus, wherein the brace, column, and beam are connected by parallel gusset plates, the system is a “dual” system because it uses gusset plates to attach both beams and diagonal braces to columns, thereby combining, interactively, a structurally braced, highly ductile lateral load resisting connection system with a highly ductile structural moment resisting frame connection system to form a redundant structural lateral load resisting system.
Reference is made to co-assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,660,017, 6,138,427, 6,516,583, and 8,205,408 (Houghton et al.) for further discussion of prior practice and the improvement of the structural connection between beams and columns through the use of gusset plates. These patents illustrate the improvements that have been manifested commercially in the construction industry by Houghton and others in side plate technology. Initially, side plate construction was introduced to greatly improve the quality of the beam-to-column connection. Further improvements included the provision of side plate technology using full length beams to achieve greater economy and to facilitate more conventional erection techniques.
In one aspect, a joint connection structure of a building framework generally comprises a column assembly including a column and a pair of gusset plates connected to the column on opposite sides of the column and extending laterally outward from the column. A full-length beam assembly includes a full-length beam having upper and lower flanges and an end portion received between the gusset plates. The full-length beam is bolted to the gusset plates of the column assembly to connect the full-length beam assembly to the column assembly. A brace has an end portion received between the gusset plates and makes an angle with the beam and with the column. The brace is bolted to the gusset plates at the end portion of the brace.
In another aspect, a joint connection structure of a building framework generally comprises a column assembly including a column and a pair of gusset plates connected to the column on opposite sides of the column and extending laterally outward from the column. A full-length beam assembly includes a full-length beam having upper and lower flanges and an end portion received between the gusset plates. An adjustable beam seat is attached to the column and supports the full-length beam assembly at least partially between the gusset plates. The adjustable beam seat is configured to move the full-length beam assembly relative to the gusset plates prior to permanent attachment of the full-length beam assembly to the column assembly.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
Referring to
The beam 19, column 15, and brace 20 may have any suitable configuration, such as an I-beam, H-beam configuration, or hollow rectangular shape (built up box member or HSS tube section). A spaced apart pair of parallel, vertically and horizontally extending gusset plates 21 sandwich the column 15, beam 19, and brace 20. An extension 22 at an upper portion of the gusset plates 21 receives the brace 20. Four optional horizontal shear plates 23 (only three are shown in
Flanges 27 of the brace 20 are bolted to the inner surface of a respective gusset plate 21 by diagonally spaced bolts 26 extending through aligned bolt holes 26A in the flange of the brace and the respective gusset plate. In the illustrated embodiment, there are two rows of diagonally spaced bolt holes 26A in each flange 27 located on opposite sides of a web of the brace 20 that receive the bolts 26 and connect the brace to the respective gusset plate.
Vertical shear plates 28 are welded at 29 to a web of the beam 19 and bolted to the gusset plates 21 by way of vertical angle irons 30 attached to the vertical shear plates (
Two angle irons (broadly, “connecting members”) 25B are disposed on a lower flange of the beam 19 at an end of the beam (see,
The bolt holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 may be larger than the bolt holes 26A in the angle irons 25A, 25B, 30 to facilitate placement of one or more of the bolts 26 through slightly misaligned holes 26A. In particular, the bolt holes 26A in the angle irons 25A, 25B could be standard size and the bolt holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 associated with the bolt holes in the angle irons 25A, 25B could be vertically slotted (as shown) such that a first dimension of the bolt holes that extends generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the column 15 is greater than a second dimension of the bolt holes that extends generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the column. The bolts 26 are inserted first through the standard sized holes in the angle irons 25A, 25B and then into the associated slotted bolt holes 26A of the gusset plates 21. Similarly, the bolt holes 26A in the angle irons 30 could be standard size and the bolt holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 associated with the bolt holes in the angle irons 30 could be horizontally slotted (as shown) such that a first dimension of the bolt holes that extends generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the beam 19 is greater than a second dimension of the bolt holes that extends generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the beam. The bolts 26 are inserted first through the standard sized holes in the angle irons 30 and then into the associated slotted bolt holes 26A of the gusset plates 21. The bolt holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 associated with the bolt holes in the brace 20 may have a different configuration than the bolt holes in the brace. In particular, the bolt holes 26A in the brace could be standard size and the bolt holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 associated with the bolt holes in the brace could be diagonally slotted (as shown) such that a first dimension of the bolt holes that extends generally perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the brace 20 is greater than a second dimension of the bolt holes that extends generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the brace. The bolts 26 are inserted first through the standard sized holes in the brace 20 and then into associated bolt holes 26A in the gusset plates 21. It will be appreciated that similar slotting of one of two mating holes may be used to facilitate bolting the components together in all the disclosed embodiments. Moreover, the holes 26A in the angle irons 25A, 25B may be slotted and the holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 may be standard within the scope of the present invention. Similarly, the bolt holes in the brace 20 may be slotted and the holes 26A in the gusset plates 21 may be standard. The bolt connection structure of this invention allows workers in the field to draw the gusset plates 21 into flush engagement with the angle irons 25A, 25B, 30 even with an initial gap between the gusset plates and full-length beam assembly 17, without the need of an external clamping structure.
Referring to
Referring to
At the construction site, the column assembly 13 is joined to the full-length beam assembly 17 and the brace 20 is joined to the column assembly and full-length beam assembly. The column assembly 13 is first erected in a vertical orientation and the end of the full-length beam assembly 17 is positioned horizontally and adjacent to the column assembly, over the gusset plates 21. The full-length beam assembly 17 is then lowered between the gusset plates 21 so that the gusset plates are disposed on opposite sides of the beam 19 and angle irons 25A, 25B of the full-length beam assembly 17. To fixedly secure the two assemblies 13, 17, horizontally spaced bolts 26 are used to attach the gusset plates 21 to the angle irons 25A, 25B through aligned bolt holes in the respective components. Vertically spaced bolts 26 are used to attach the gusset plates 21 to the angles irons 30 welded to the web of the beam 19. The brace 20 is then lowered between the extensions 22 of the gusset plates 21 so that the extensions are disposed on opposite sides of the brace. Diagonally spaced bolts 26 are used to attach the gusset plates 21 to the brace 20. Thus, at the construction site, the dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure 11 is completed exclusively through bolt connections. In the field, the dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure 11 is constructed without the use of welds. The joint connection structure 11 can be used if the building frame is dimensionally close to the exterior curtain wall of the building because the angle irons 25A, 25B are on the inside of the gusset plates 21.
The joint connection structure 11 outlined above is a dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure. It will be understood by a person having ordinary skill in the art that a braced beam-to-column-to-beam type structure may have additional analogous components. Most preferably, each of the components of the joint connection structure 11, as well as the beam 19, column 15, and brace 20, are made of structural steel. Some of the components of the joint connection structure 11 are united by welding and some by bolting. The welding may be initially performed at a fabrication shop. The bolting may be performed at the construction site, which is the preferred option in many regions of the world.
The bolted joint connection structure of the present invention also increases construction tolerance for misalignment of components during field steel frame erection because of the novel slotting orientation of the bolt holes 26A in which some are elongated in a vertical direction and others are elongated in a horizontal direction that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the beam 19.
Unlike oversized holes requiring the use of slip-critical bolts, the slotted bolt holes 26A are larger than standard bolt holes in only one direction. Also, the slot direction of the bolt holes 26A associated with angle irons 25A, 25B is perpendicular to the direction of load, that is, does not extend along the longitudinal axis of the beam 19. Instead, the slots of the bolt holes 26A associated with the angle irons 25A, 26B extend perpendicular (broadly, “transverse”) to the longitudinal axis of the beam 19 so that when the joint connection structure 11 is loaded, and in particular when the beam is loaded axially along its length or about its major axis in bending, a gap is not formed between the bolts 26 and their respective bolt holes 26A (i.e., no slip of bolt occurs because bolts 26 are already loaded by direct bearing in shear). As used herein “transverse” to the longitudinal axis of the beam 19 means any direction that crosses over the longitudinal axis of the beam and is not parallel to the longitudinal axis of the beam. In some embodiments, the bolt holes 26A have a slotted dimension that is up to about 2.5 times the diameter of the bolt 26. In some embodiments, the bolt holes 26A have a slotted dimension that is from about 3/16 in. up to about 2¾ in. larger than the diameter of the bolt 26. In a preferred embodiment, the bolt holes 26A have a slotted dimension that is about ¾ in. larger than the diameter of the bolt 26.
The unique geometry and stiffness of this all shop fillet-welded and all field-bolted dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure 11 maximizes its performance and the broadness of its design applications, including both extreme wind and moderate-to-severe seismic conditions. In particular, the all field-bolted joint connection structure 11 preserves the physical separation (or gap) between the end of a full-length beam 19 and the flange face of the column 15 made possible by the use of vertically and horizontally extended parallel gusset plates 21 that sandwich the column and the beam similar to prior designs which feature an all field fillet-welded joint connection structure; thus eliminating all of the uncertainty of bending moment load transfer between a rigidly attached steel moment frame beam and column used in the past.
Further, by including the vertically and horizontally extending parallel gusset plates 21 that sandwich both the column 15, beam 19, and brace 20, this current all field-bolted dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure 11 preserves the advantage of increased beam-to-column joint stiffness, with a corresponding increase in overall steel moment frame stiffness. The dual system joint connection structure 11 combines a brace frame connection system and a beam frame connection system. The brace frame connection system and the beam frame connection system share the applied lateral load on the basis of relative system stiffnesses. This dual system stiffness joint connection structure 11 can result in smaller beam and brace sizes when the building design is controlled by lateral story drift (not member strength), and hence reduced material costs. The joint connection structure 11 results in reduced load demand on the braced frame lateral load resisting system, with corresponding smaller beam and brace sizes. When the building design is controlled by member strength (not lateral story drift), this all field-bolted dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structure 11 also permits reducing the beam size and column size, and hence material quantities and fabrication cost, at least in part because its connection geometry has no net section reduction in either the beam or the column (i.e., no bolt holes through either the beam or column), thereby maintaining the full strength of the beam and column.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, a full-length beam is connected to gusset plates by bolts so that the full-length beam and gusset plates are substantially free of welded connection. Additionally, a brace is connected to the gusset plates by bolts so that the brace and gusset plates are substantially free of welded connection. It will be understood that welding the column assembly 13 to the full-length beam assembly 17 and/or brace 20 is within the scope of that aspect of the disclosure.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
A pair of threaded studs 446 extend through respective holes in the second leg of the angle iron 442. Each stud 446 is attached in the respective hole by a pair of nuts 448 threaded on the stud above and below the second leg of the angle iron 442. The top ends of the threaded studs 446 engage a bottom surface of a lower flange of the beam 419 to temporarily support the full-length beam assembly 417 before the full-length beam assembly is bolted to the column assembly 413. In the illustrated embodiment, the top end of each stud 446 is attached by weld 447 to the bottom surface of the lower flange of the beam 419. Typically, the threaded studs 446 are welded to the lower flange of the beam 419 in the shop during fabrication of the beam assembly. However, a stud or bolt (not shown) could be separate from the beam 419 (i.e., not welded to the beam) and selectively engageable with the beam.
The adjustable beam seat 440 is attached to the column 415, such that a top surface of a second leg of angle iron 442 is generally below a final design height of the lower flange of the beam 419 after the full-length beam assembly 417 is bolted to the column assembly. The nuts 448 can be selectively turned to move studs 446 and hence the full-length beam assembly 417 to the final beam height. In order to provide physical clearance between the angle iron 442 attached to column 413 and angle irons 425B, as well as to provide adequate worker access for adjusting the leveling nuts 448 of threaded studs 446 to raise or lower the full-length beam assembly 417 for fine tuning the alignment of bolt holes between gusset plates 421 and angle irons 425A, 425B during erection, the ends of angle irons 425B nearest the face of column 415 are located increased distances away from face of column 415 as compared to its location shown in
In use, the full-length beam assembly 417 can be lowered down between the gusset plates 421 and engaged with the adjustable beam seat 440. The threaded studs 446 are received into respective holes in the angle iron 442 as the beam assembly 417 is lowered between the gusset plates until the upper nuts 448 engage the horizontal second legs of the beam seat 440. The lower nuts 448 are then threaded onto the lower ends of the threaded studs 446. To adjust the height of the full-length beam assembly 417 while being supported by the adjustable beam seat 440, the nuts 448 are rotated causing the beam assembly to either be raised when the nuts are rotated in a first direction or lowered when the nuts are rotated in a second direction opposite the first direction. Typically, this is done to achieve alignment of bolt holes in the gusset plates with bolt holes associated with the beam assembly 417 and/or brace 420. Once the full-length beam assembly 417 is in the selected position, the beam assembly can be bolted to the column assembly 413. Therefore, the adjustable beam seat 440 both supports the weight of the full-length beam assembly 417 and facilitates a fine tune adjustment of the height of the beam assembly for locating the beam assembly in a position for being bolted to the column assembly 413. The beam seat 440 allows the beam assembly 417 to be stabilized prior to any fixed connection to the column assembly 413.
Referring to
Referring to
It will be understood that the specific connections described in each of the embodiments are interchangeable.
When introducing elements of the present invention or the preferred embodiments(s) thereof, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions, products, and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Moment resisting column-to-beam joint connection structures, column assemblies and beam assemblies that are constructed according to the principles of the present invention provide numerous unique features, benefits and advantages. Reference is made to the figures illustrating one of the embodiments to which the advantages and benefits apply. All field-bolted dual braced/moment resisting frame, beam-to-column-to-diagonal brace joint connection structures, column assemblies, and full-length beam assemblies that are constructed according to the principles of the present invention provide numerous unique features and advantages. At least one embodiment has the advantage of reducing material quantities and associated cost. In at least one embodiment, the present invention provides ease and predictability of fabrication. At least one other embodiment may have the advantage of faster frame erection due to purposeful mitigation of erection alignment and milled, rolled section tolerance uncertainties. Still in other embodiments the present invention may provide maximum steel frame stiffness for controlling lateral drift of the structural frame system. In at least one embodiment, the present invention provides overall optimum performance when subjected to severe load application and system ductility demand on the joint connection structure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/729,995, filed Jun. 3, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1211446 | Horn | Jan 1917 | A |
1883376 | Hilpert | Oct 1932 | A |
2514607 | McLean | Jul 1950 | A |
2720291 | Larkin | Oct 1955 | A |
2840014 | McKinley | Jun 1958 | A |
2943716 | Babcock | Jul 1960 | A |
3691712 | Bowling et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3938297 | Sato | Feb 1976 | A |
3952472 | Boehmig | Apr 1976 | A |
4074947 | Matake et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4211045 | Koizumi et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4409765 | Pall | Oct 1983 | A |
4441289 | Ikuo et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
5148642 | Plumier et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5253465 | Gilb | Oct 1993 | A |
5263296 | Spera | Nov 1993 | A |
5402614 | Jewell | Apr 1995 | A |
5577353 | Simpson | Nov 1996 | A |
5660017 | Houghton | Aug 1997 | A |
5680738 | Allen | Oct 1997 | A |
5806265 | Sluiter | Sep 1998 | A |
6022165 | Lin | Feb 2000 | A |
6073405 | Kasai et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6138427 | Houghton | Jun 2000 | A |
6158184 | Timmerman, Sr. | Dec 2000 | A |
6237303 | Allen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6516583 | Houghton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6591573 | Hougton | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6802169 | Simmons | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6837010 | Powell et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6993880 | Cameron et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7076926 | Kasai et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7127863 | Simmons | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7225588 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7703244 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7784226 | Ichikawa et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7941985 | Simmons | May 2011 | B2 |
8122671 | Karns | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8146322 | Karns | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8205408 | Houghton et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8375652 | Hiriyur et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8468775 | Vaughn | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8505260 | Chang et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8925278 | Sugihara | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9514907 | McManus | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9670676 | Sirowatka | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20020020141 | Payer | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046514 | Leung | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020124520 | Bock | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030009977 | Houghton | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030203008 | Gunasekaran | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205008 | Sridhara | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208985 | Allen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040244330 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050204684 | Houghton | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060101733 | Jen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112652 | Ichikawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070209314 | Vaughn | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245643 | Ichikawa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253766 | Packer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261356 | Vaughn | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080289267 | Sarkisian | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025308 | Deans et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090165419 | Richard et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090223166 | Ohata et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100031587 | Weeks | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100043338 | Houghton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100043347 | Houghton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100043348 | Houghton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110252743 | Yang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030305 | Karns | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047925 | Gan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120009009 | Bub | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017523 | Ozaki et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120062648 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130168626 | Blinn | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140020311 | Richard | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140062648 | McManus et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140083046 | Yang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140182234 | Yang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140182236 | Doupe et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140318075 | Shubaibar | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325932 | Tran et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150218838 | Ichikawa | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150275501 | Houghton | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160002910 | Green | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160356033 | Houghton | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170314254 | Houghton | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09209477 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2003074126 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2007169983 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2004067869 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2012112608 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2014085680 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
American Institute of Steel Construction, Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-10, ANSI/AISC 358s1-11, Including Supplement No. 1, 2011, 178 pages, Chicago, Illinois. |
American Institute of Steel Construction, Steel Design Guide 4, Extended End-Plate Moment Connections, Seismic and Wind Applications, Second Edition, 166 pages, 2003, United States. |
American Institute of Steel Construction, Steel Design Guide Series 16, Flush and Extended Multiple Row, Moment End-Plate Connections, 74 pages, 2002, United States. |
Atsushi Sato, et al., Cyclic Behavior and Seismic Design of Bolted Flange Plate Steel Moment Connections, Engineering Journal, Fourth Quarter, 2008, pp. 221-232, United States. |
Simpson, Strong Tie, Introduction to the Strong Frame® Special Moment Frame, http://www.strongtie.com/products/strongframe/special_mf/intro.asp, 2014, 3 pages, United States. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where Applicable, Protest Fees for PCT Application No. PCT/IB2016/053199, dated Jul. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/IB2016/053199, dated Sep. 12, 2016, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Aug. 21, 2015, 10 pages. |
Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Apr. 4, 2016, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Oct. 31, 2016, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Aug. 1, 2017, 19 pages. |
Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Nov. 22, 2017, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Apr. 2, 2018, 17 pages. |
Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/729,995, dated Aug. 10, 2018, 28 pages. |
United Kingdom Examination Report under Section 18(3) for GB1717740.3 dated May 19, 2020, 2 pages, United Kingdom. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190106875 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14729995 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 16215426 | US |