This invention relates to a gypsum board coating comprising cardboard with a water-repellent treatment, and to gypsum board comprising a board made of gypsum and a cardboard coating with water-repellent treatment attached to the gypsum board. This invention also relates to a method for producing the cardboard-coated gypsum board.
Gypsum board is a construction material which is commonly used in indoor and outdoor walls. Gypsum board is susceptible to damp, which in the long term can lead to micro-organism growth. This places restrictions on the use of gypsum board in wet rooms such as beneath tiles in bathrooms. Even though boards placed beneath tiles are generally treated with a waterproofing agent, untreated areas may be left on the boards' surface, which will let moisture into the boards.
The gypsum board coating produced in accordance with this invention is characterized by a treatment agent in the cardboard which prevents the growth of micro-organisms. The boards produced in accordance with this invention are characterized by a treatment agent in the cardboard coating which prevents the growth of micro-organisms.
Micro-organisms are yeasts, bacteria and fungi such as mould fungi. By gypsum board in this application we mean a board containing gypsum. The board may contain other materials in addition to gypsum, including for instance mineral or wood fibers.
The gypsum board produced in accordance with this invention can be used as a construction material in wet rooms. In addition to the gypsum board, this board comprises a coating, optimally a cardboard coating, onto which a waterproofing treatment may be spread. The cardboard coating is made water-repellent with a polymer compound containing waxy polymers. In addition to having water-repellent properties, the polymer compound used must be sufficiently heat-resistant and allow steam to permeate through the treated cardboard. This is important because cardboard-coated gypsum boards can be dried during production to prevent their internal steam pressure from rising too high. The structures into which the gypsum boards are placed require the gypsum board to be breathable. Breathability can be evaluated for instance through steam permeability. A good steam permeability level is approximately 3×10−9 kg/m2·s·Pa or an SD value of approximately 0.1 m. The cardboard's surface must be such that the waterproofing treatment attaches to it properly. Usually the cardboard coating is in a single layer, but multilayer solutions are also possible. After the production process, the cardboard is suitably acidic or can be made suitably acidic, because the functioning of benzoic acid salts is optimal in acidic conditions.
After the necessary lowering of the pH (e.g. with weak sulphuric acid), the cardboard is first treated with an agent which prevents the growth of microbes. Optimally the anti-microbial agent should be a benzoic acid salt, for example sodium benzoate or potassium benzoate. Generally the cardboard used is 150-250 g/m2 in weight, the optimal weight being 200 g/m2. The benzoic acid salt is dissolved in water to form a 20% solution by weight. A binding agent, for example acrylate, can be added to the solution. The binding agent has an effect e.g. on the surface hardness of the cardboard. Optimally, the binding agent should be lipophobic. The cardboard is treated with the benzoic acid salt solution applied with a surface adhesive press in such a way that the dry cardboard contains 2-4 g/m2, optimally 3 g/m2, of benzoic acid salt. A particular benefit in the use of benzoic acid salt lies in the fact that this treatment agent is entirely non-toxic. The skin depth of the benzoic acid should optimally be 40-60 μm and is usually approximately 50 μm. The concentration of benzoic acid salt in the part of the cardboard which it permeates is 7-9% by weight, usually approximately 8% by weight. Benzoic acid or a benzoic acid/benzoic acid salt compound can be used instead of benzoic acid salt. Adipic acid and/or citric acid can also be used separately or in combination instead of the abovementioned benzoic acid salts or in combination with the abovementioned benzoic acid salts.
Once the cardboard has been treated with the antimicrobial agent, dried and cooled, it is treated with a polymer compound comprising waxy polymers. The UV resistance of the polymer compound is usually high. The polymer compound is spread, sufficiently cooled, onto the cardboard, and any excess is scraped off with a blade scraper. After this the cardboard's heat level is raised to cause the polymer compound to be absorbed deeper into the cardboard. The polymer compound must not, however, go through to the other side of the cardboard so that the cardboard can be attached to the gypsum board at a later production stage. Therefore the cardboard should only be treated on one side and in such a way that it is still permeable to steam. A good way to check that steam permeability has been maintained is the Gurley air permeability test, which should give a result of less than 100 s/100 ml. The concentration of the polymer compound in the finished cardboard, when dry, should be 10-14 g/m2, optimally 12 g/m2. It is important that the thermal load of the treated cardboard does not rise above 4 MJ/m2. The skin depth of the polymer compound should be 90-110 μm, optimally approximately 100 μm.
The cardboard is attached to the gypsum board with gypsite, after which the finished boards are dried. This process further improves the cardboard's steam permeability and friction. A particular benefit brought by the gypsum board coating described in this application is the fact that the coating (cardboard) can be used in the manner of ordinary gypsum cardboard without specific running parameters. A further benefit is the fact that only the coating has to be treated with an agent to prevent the growth of micro-organisms.
The cardboard could be replaced by a different wood-fiber-based material in sheet form, for example thin plywood.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20045307 | Aug 2004 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2005/000365 | 8/24/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/19/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/021614 | 3/2/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3998944 | Long | Dec 1976 | A |
5719172 | Oppong et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6294186 | Beerse et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6680127 | Capps | Jan 2004 | B2 |
20030035981 | Capps | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060008513 | Holbert et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 251 215 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 156 816 | Jul 1969 | GB |
1429319 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2004-115978 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004002916 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004038120 | May 2004 | WO |
2004108625 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080057346 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |