This application claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 0802618-9 filed Dec. 19, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein.
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to a device for restricting spinning in a gyratory crusher, which includes a crushing head on which a first crushing shell is mounted; a frame on which a second crushing shell is mounted, wherein the second crushing shell defines, together with the first crushing shell, a crushing gap; and a driving device, which is arranged with a rotating eccentric to cause the crushing head to execute a gyratory movement for crushing material that is introduced in the crushing gap.
2. Background Art
A gyratory crusher of the kind stated above can be used for crushing, for example, ore and rock material into smaller size. A problem associated with gyratory crushers of this kind is that on those occasions when no material is being fed to the crusher, the crushing head will eventually start to rotate with the eccentric, which is generally referred to as spinning. If the crushing head is spinning when feed material is again introduced into the gyratory crusher, there is a risk that material will be ejected from the crusher and/or that the crushing shells will be damaged. Moreover, the wear of bearing mechanisms provided between the eccentric and the crushing head can be considerable.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,887,143 discloses an arrangement for restricting spinning in a gyratory crusher. A hydraulic pump is mounted in the frame bottom part of the crusher with the input drive shaft thereof being connected to the crushing head. The pump is provided with a check valve, which enables it to serve essentially as a hydraulic anti-reverse for the crushing head.
A hydraulic pump provided with an anti-reverse is complex and tends to break relatively easily or become clogged by dirt, which may lead to unwanted shutdowns.
It is desired to provide a gyratory crusher capable of restricting spinning, whereby the above drawbacks associated with the prior art are significantly reduced or completely eliminated.
This can be achieved by a gyratory crusher, which includes a crushing head on which a first crushing shell is mounted; a frame on which a second crushing shell is mounted, wherein the second crushing shell defines, together with the first crushing shell, a crushing gap; and a driving device, which is arranged with a rotating eccentric to cause the crushing head to execute a gyratory movement for crushing material that is introduced in the crushing gap. The crushing head is connected to the frame by way of a rotation-restricting arrangement, which includes a beater arranged to rotate in a tank. The tank is adapted to contain a liquid for braking the rotation of the beater.
An advantage of this gyratory crusher is that a robust and simple anti-spin function is obtained. As a result of the simple design of the above crusher, the number of unwanted shutdowns can be reduced.
According to one embodiment, the eccentric is arranged to rotate about a central shaft and the rotation-restricting arrangement is located inside the central shaft. This positioning results in a particularly compact design of the rotation-restricting arrangement and does not add to the height of the crusher. In a particular embodiment, the center of the beater is located above the center of the central shaft, seen in the vertical direction, this position enabling a relatively simple connection to the crushing head as well as to the central shaft.
According to one embodiment, the tank has a circular-cylindrical wall, which is provided with at least one protrusion extending towards the beater. An advantage of the protrusion is that it increases the braking action exerted by the liquid on the beater and reduces the risk of the liquid swirling round in the tank in an undesirable manner due to the rotation of the beater.
According to one embodiment, the beater includes a beater shaft provided with at least one projecting member, which is to be braked, during rotation of the beater, by a liquid contained in the tank. According to one embodiment, the at least one projecting member can be substantially plate-shaped and can extend from the beater shaft towards the wall of the tank in a plane that is substantially parallel to the extent of the beater shaft. This embodiment is particularly suitable for crushers which can be operated in both directions of rotation.
According to a further embodiment, said at least one projecting member of the beater is of arcuate cross-section, as seen in a plane that is perpendicular to the beater shaft. This shape enables different braking effects to be obtained depending on the direction of rotation of the crushing head, which may reduce the braking action of the rotation-restricting arrangement during rotation of the crushing head in the desired direction of rolling engagement associated with operation.
According to one embodiment, the portion of said at least one projecting member of the beater that is most radially distant from the beater shaft is deflectable, which reduces the risk of damage to the rotation-restricting arrangement when cold starting the crusher, since the viscosity of the liquid can be very high at the time of cold starting.
According to one embodiment, the beater is connected to the crushing head by a universal joint shaft, which is provided with at least one universal joint. In a particular embodiment, the universal joint shaft is divided into an upper shaft section and a lower shaft section, and the shaft sections are rotationally locked together and axially displaceable relative to each other.
In particular embodiments, the rotation-restricting arrangement is adapted to generate, during operation, a braking torque of at least 300 Nm when the crushing head is about to start rotating. In a more particular embodiment, a speed or rotation relative to the frame of the crusher head, when the crushing head is about to start rotating, is 0 revolutions per second.
According to one embodiment, the crushing head is connected to the rotation-restricting arrangement by a torque limiter, which reduces the risk of damage to the rotation-restricting arrangement when cold starting the crusher.
The disclosed makes it possible to provide spinning restriction with fewer mechanical components and/or to improve the operational reliability of said spinning restriction. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation, of the invention as claimed.
The following detailed description can be read in connection with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals designate like elements and in which:
a-b are schematic perspective views showing parts of a further alternative embodiment of a beater and tank,
A first crushing shell 30 is fixedly mounted on the crushing head 22. A second crushing shell 32 is fixedly mounted on the frame top part 16. Between the two crushing shells 30, 32 a crushing gap 34 is formed, the width of which, in axial section as illustrated in
If no material to be crushed is present in the crushing gap 34, the crushing head 22 will not be in rolling engagement with said second crushing shell 32. Instead, the friction in the bearing mechanism between the eccentric 20 and the crushing head 22 will strive to cause the crushing head 22 to rotate in the same direction and at substantially the same speed as the eccentric 20. Since the speed of rotation of the eccentric 20 is much higher than the typical speed of rotation, during rolling engagement, of the crushing head 22, the crushing head 22 too, unless it is braked in some way, will reach a high speed of rotation when there is no material in the crushing gap 34. Such a significant increase of the rotational speed of the crushing head 22 in a direction of rotation opposite to the direction of rotation during the rolling engagement described above will be referred to below as “spinning”. Accordingly, when material is present in the crushing gap 34 and the crushing head 22 is in rolling engagement with the second crushing shell 32, the crushing head 22 rotates slowly in a first direction of rotation, which is opposite to the direction of rotation of the eccentric 20. On the other hand, when no material, or only very little material, is present in the crushing gap 34, there is a risk that the crushing head 22, unless it is braked, quickly starts to rotate in a second direction of rotation, which is the same as the direction of rotation of the eccentric 20, which means that the crushing head 22 is spinning. Spinning is undesirable and may result in increased wear of the crushing shells 30, 32 and of the bearing mechanisms of the crusher 10 provided between the crushing head 22 and the eccentric 20. Spinning may also result in the feed material to be crushed being ejected from the feed opening of the crusher 10.
The crusher 10 is provided with a device that reduces the tendency of the crushing head 22 to spin. Such a device will be described below.
The crushing head 22 is supported on a support piston 36, which is hydraulically vertically adjustable inside the central shaft 18 and rotationally locked to the same. The purpose of the vertical adjustability is, inter alia, to enable any wear of the crushing shells 30, 32 to be compensated for, but also to allow the width of the gap 34 to be varied, in order to produce crushed material of different sizes. A set of thrust bearings 38, which are arranged between the crushing head 22 and the support piston 36, enables tilting of the crushing head 22 during the gyrating movement thereof. The support piston 36 is connected to the crushing head 22 by way of a rotation-restricting arrangement 40, as is shown more clearly in the perspective view in
The purpose of the mechanical slip clutch 49 is to protect the rotation-restricting arrangement 40 against overload damage which might otherwise occur if the viscosity of the oil in the tank 42 is too high before the oil has reached its working temperature, for example when cold starting the crusher in a cold winter climate. Naturally, torque limiters other than the mechanical slip clutch type can be used.
The universal joint shaft 46 is provided with universal joints 53, which enable the universal joint shaft 46, at the point of attachment to the crushing head 22, to move with the gyrating movement of the crushing head 22. The universal joint shaft 46 can also be provided with splines (not shown) or similar ridges extending along the shaft 46, which allow the length of the universal joint shaft 46 to be adjusted to compensate for any heat expansion and wear of, inter alia, the thrust bearings 38. In the embodiment shown in
Furthermore, the inner wall of the tank 42 is provided with protrusions 50, which serve to prevent the oil from creating a swirling motion in the tank 42 during operation, preserving in this way the resistance of the oil. To limit the occurrence of swirling in an efficient manner the protrusions 50 should have an area, as projected in the tangential direction of the beater 44, of at least approximately 10 cm2. The clearance between the beater blades 48 of the beater 44 and the protrusions 50 should be between 1 and 20 mm, more preferred between 2 and 10 mm, to obtain a satisfactory braking action. Moreover, the number of beater blades 48 can be between 2 and 10. The number of protrusions 50 projecting from the tank wall can be between 3 and 20. The number of beater blades 48 can be even or uneven. Irrespectively of the number of beater blades 48, an even or uneven number of protrusions 50 can be used.
During operation of the crusher, the beater 44 will be braked in the oil 37 in the tank 42. The braking action will be essentially the same independent of the direction of rotation of the beater 44. However, the braking action will be largely dependent upon the speed of the beater 44. At low speeds of the beater 44 the braking action will be small, whereas at high speeds a considerable braking action will be obtained. In normal operation of the crusher, such as, when material is fed into the gap 34 shown in
a and 5b illustrate a rotation-restricting arrangement 240 which comprises a beater 244, which is adapted to rotate in a tank 242 provided with semi-circular protrusions 250 and adapted to contain a liquid, for example hydraulic oil. An upper portion of the wall of the tank 242 has been left out in order to show the beater 244 more clearly. A beater shaft 247 is provided with beater blades 248. The radially outer portions 251 of the beater blades 248 are made of a resilient material, for example rubber, plastic or spring steel.
It will be appreciated that various modifications of the embodiments described above are conceivable within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Thus, the design of the rotation-restricting arrangement 40 is not limited to that of a rotary beater 44 in a rotationally fixed tank 42. The rotation-restricting arrangement 40 can also have, for example, a rotary tank 42 which is connected to the crushing head and which rotates about a fixed beater 44 connected to the central shaft 18 or to the frame 12, or it can be of any other suitable design. The relative movement of the beater 44 and the tank 42 is not limited to a rotating motion; also linear and other beating motions or combinations of beating motions are conceivable and fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Furthermore, the torque limiter is not limited to a mechanical slip clutch 49, the torque limiter may be of various types. For example, the torque limiter can be a mechanical or hydraulic slip clutch, or a sacrificial component, which is dimensioned to break at an overload condition to spare the beater.
Preferably, the liquid in the tank 42 is some kind of oil, such as lubricating or hydraulic oil, but may also be any other kind of liquid, such as water.
The beater blades can have a shape other than that of the beater blades 48, 148, 248 shown in the Figures. For example, each beater blade may have the shape of an S or a spiral.
In the embodiments described above, the rotation-restricting arrangement is shown as arranged on a gyratory crusher of the type that is without a top bearing. Naturally, a rotation-restricting arrangement may well be mounted on a gyratory crusher having a top bearing as well as on other types of gyratory crushers.
Although described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departure from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0802618-9 | Dec 2008 | SE | national |