The invention relates to a gyroscope-based rotation damper for a motor vehicle.
Different designs of rotation dampers for vibration damping of the structure of a motor vehicle are known from the prior art. Thus, DE 10 2011 101 350 A1 discloses a rotation damper for a motor vehicle, comprising at least one damper element for damping the relative movement between a first mass disposed on the side of the wheel suspension and a second mass disposed on the side of the vehicle body. In this case, the damper element has at least one rotatable damper part, which can be displaced into a rotational movement by way of a lifting element movable through movement of the mass and mechanically coupled in movement to the damper part, wherein at least one spring damping element is integrated into the mechanical movement coupling between lifting element and rotatable damper part.
The object of the invention is to provide a gyroscope-based rotation damper for a motor vehicle, in which the damping effect is to be attributed to a gyroscopically acting flywheel mounted in a gimbal on the motor vehicle structure.
The gyroscope-based rotation damper for a motor vehicle according to the invention comprises a flywheel rotating around an axis of rotation at an angular velocity ωφ and driven via a drive, the flywheel being mounted in a gimbal on the motor vehicle structure by way of a first bearing element and a second bearing element. For this purpose, the flywheel is mounted rotatably around the angle of rotation φ at the first bearing element, and the first bearing element is mounted rotatably at the second bearing element around a first angle of rotation θ around a first axis aligned orthogonal to the axis of rotation of the flywheel, and the second bearing element is mounted rotatably on the motor vehicle structure around a second angle of rotation ψ around a second axis aligned orthogonal to the first axis. In addition, the first bearing element has means by which the first bearing element can be joined to a wheel carrier in such a way that a compression/rebound movement of the wheel carrier brings about a rotation of the first bearing element around the first angle of rotation θ. Also, the gyroscope-based rotation damper comprises a shaft drive that is operatively connected to the second bearing element via a drive shaft and a controller unit for controlling the shaft drive, wherein the controller unit controls the angular velocity ωψ and/or the torque Mψ of the drive shaft by way of the shaft drive as a function of the first angle of rotation θ and/or of the torque Mθ.
The configuration of the gyroscope-based rotation damper according to the invention is characterized in that the effect of rotational inertia is used in order to introduce forces into the chassis. These forces can replace and expand the function of a conventional damper element.
A brief explanation of the functional principle is as follows:
In the initial state, the flywheel rotates around its axis of rotation at the angular velocity ωφ. If a torque MΘ is effective at the first axis of the first bearing element, a torque Mφ arises around the second axis due to precession. The torques lead to an angular velocity of the first or the second bearing element. A torque MΘ consequently leads to an angular velocity ωΘ of the first bearing element. This torsion changes the direction of the angular velocity vector ωφ of the flywheel. The rotating flywheel reacts to such a disruption with the mentioned precession torque Mψ. However, since the angular velocity ωψ also changes the angular velocity vector ωφ of the flywheel due to the structure, there is a direct effect of all three axes. Introduction of energy into one axis shows a change in the energy of the other two axes.
If the first bearing element is considered as the input, then MΘ and ωΘ are equalized. If this energy can again be withdrawn at the second axis of the second bearing element, Mψ and ωψ are thereby oriented opposite one another. The inverse case is likewise possible. Equalized amounts of Mψ and ωψ lead to unequally oriented amounts of MΘ and ωΘ. If all of the energy of the torque Mψ is not withdrawn, then the angular velocity ψφ of the flywheel will increase due to the feedback effect. The excess energy is stored in the form of kinetic energy in the rotational movement of the flywheel. The ratio of the individual torques in this case is determined by the rotational inertias of the flywheel.
Now, if the first bearing element is joined to a wheel carrier in such a way that a compression/rebound of the wheel carrier causes a torque MΘ and an angular velocity ωΘ of the first bearing element around the first axis, a relative movement of the second bearing element arises around the second axis. If the angular velocity ωψ of the second bearing element introduces a counter-torque Mψ, then the relative movement of the second bearing element around the second axis is damped. This leads in turn to the damping of the angular velocity ωΘ of the first bearing element around the first axis. Depending on the magnitude of the counter-torque Mψ in each case, the damping results as stronger or weaker.
In contrast to this, if a torque Mψ equalized to the angular velocity ωψ is introduced, this leads to a support of the compression/rebound movement. That is, the gyroscope-based rotation damper can also be used as an actuator in order to actively provide vertical forces at the wheel carrier and thus to take over functions of an active chassis.
Preferably, the drive of the flywheel and/or the shaft drive of the drive shaft is designed as an electric motor. This has the advantage that the possibility of producing power is given in the generator operation, so that under certain circumstances, a feedback of energy into the vehicle network power system is made possible.
According to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the first bearing element is operatively connected to the wheel carrier in such a way that in the case of a compression/rebound movement of the wheel carrier for the first angle of rotation θ, the condition −π/2<θ<+π/2 is always fulfilled.
It is thereby ensured that a torque Mθ can be maintained for a very long time, so that the system can be used for roll stabilization, raising and lowering of wheels and of the structure, and other conceivable active chassis controls.
Additional advantages, features and application possibilities of the present invention result from the following description in combination with the example of embodiment shown in the drawing.
In the drawing:
The gyroscope-based rotation damper 10 comprises a flywheel 14 that rotates around an axis of rotation 12 at an angular velocity ωφ and that is mounted in a gimbal by way of a first bearing element 16 and a second bearing element 18.
In this case, the flywheel 14 is mounted rotatably around the angle of rotation φ at the first bearing element, and the first bearing element 16 is mounted rotatably at the second bearing element 18 around a first angle of rotation θ around a first axis 16a aligned orthogonal to the axis of rotation 12 of the flywheel 14, and the second bearing element 18 is mounted rotatably on the motor vehicle structure around a second angle of rotation ψ around a second axis 18a aligned orthogonal to the first axis 16a.
Not shown in the schematic representation according to
The schematically shown gyroscope-based rotation damper 10 uses the effect of rotational inertia in order to introduce forces into the chassis at a suitable place. These forces will replace and expand the function of a conventional damper element.
A brief explanation of the functional principle is as follows:
In the initial state, the flywheel 14 rotates around its axis of rotation 12 at the angular velocity ωφ. If a torque MΘ is effective at the first axis 16a of the first bearing element 16, a torque Mψ arises around the second axis 18a due to the precession. The torques lead to an angular velocity ωΘ or ωψ, respectively, of the first or the second bearing element 16, 18. A torque MΘ consequently leads to an angular velocity ωΘ of the first bearing element 16. This torsion changes the direction of the angular velocity vector ωφ of the flywheel 14. The rotating flywheel 14 reacts to such a disruption with the mentioned precession torque Mψ. However, since the angular velocity ωψ also changes the angular velocity vector ωφ of the flywheel 14 due to the structure, there is a direct effect of all three axes. Introduction of energy into one axis shows a change in the energy of the other two axes.
If the first bearing element 16 is considered as the input, then MΘ and ωΘ are equalized. If this energy can again be withdrawn at the second axis 18a of the second bearing element 18, Mψ and ωψ are thereby oriented opposite one another. The inverse case is likewise possible. Equalized amounts of Mψ and ωψ lead to unequally oriented amounts of MΘ and ωΘ. If all of the energy of the torque Mψ is not withdrawn, then the angular velocity ωφ of the flywheel 14 will increase due to the feedback effect. The excess energy is stored in the form of kinetic energy in the rotational movement of the flywheel 14. The ratio of the individual torques in this case is determined by the rotational inertias of the flywheel.
Now, if the first bearing element 16 is joined to the wheel carrier in such a way that a compression/rebound of the wheel carrier causes a torque MΘ and an angular velocity ωΘ of the first bearing element 16 around the first axis 16a, a relative movement of the second bearing element 18 arises around the second axis 18a. If a counter-torque Mψ is introduced relative to the angular velocity ωψ of the second bearing element via the shaft motor, then the relative movement of the second bearing element 18 around the second axis 18a is damped. This leads in turn to the damping of the angular velocity ωΘ of the first bearing element 16 around the first axis 16a. Depending on the magnitude of the counter-torque Mψ in each case, the damping results as stronger or weaker.
In contrast to this, if a torque Mψ equalized to the angular velocity ωψ is introduced by the shaft motor, this leads to a support of the compression/rebound movement. That is, the gyroscope-based rotation damper can also be used as an actuator in order to actively provide vertical forces at the wheel carrier and thus to take over functions of an active chassis.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 000 566 | Jan 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/002500 | 12/12/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/112942 | 7/21/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3250137 | Delsuc | May 1966 | A |
3711113 | Stammreich | Jan 1973 | A |
20080234877 | Kimura | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20160144684 | De Vlugt | May 2016 | A1 |
20160229256 | Koch | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180264905 | Kimura | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102013015702 | Dec 2014 | DE |
0650890 | May 1995 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 1, 2019 in corresponding European patent application No. 15 813 690.3 including partial machine-generated English language translation; 7 pages. |
Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2015 of corresponding German application No. 10 2015 000 566.9; 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 21, 2016 of corresponding application No. PCT/EP2015/002500; 12 pgs. |
Notification of Transmittal of Translation of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 27, 2017, in connection with corresponding international application No. PCT/EP2015/002500 (6 pgs.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180009286 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |