The invention relates to a hair care device and more particularly to a device for remedying tangles in hair, and especially though not exclusively, wet hair.
It is known to use hairbrushes or combs to try to remedy tangles by teasing out tangles in dry or wet hair, such brushes generally having stiff bristles or teeth. This has not been successful and can lead to knots, which sometimes necessitate the knotted hair being cut.
The term “bristles” as used here is intended to mean filamentary projections generally such as are found on a brush, and includes plastics filamentary projections, and it is not limited herein to animal-hair bristles. In this specification, references to the lengths of such bristles are to be interpreted to mean the length of bristle which projects from a body of a device, in other words the effective length of said bristles.
The invention provides in one of its aspects a hair care device for use in untangling hair comprising a body portion and projecting therefrom a plurality of substantially parallel flexible bristles made of soft plastic material, said bristles being arranged such that over at least a part of the area of said bristles, some of said bristles are of shorter length such that the bristles and the shorter length bristles are interspersed over said at least part of the area of bristles.
Preferably, the shorter length bristles are shorter than the bristles by a uniform amount.
Desirably, the uniform amount is approximately 0.007 meters. The (longer) bristles and shorter bristles are preferably approximately 0.014 and 0.007 meters long, respectively.
Advantageously, the shorter length bristles alternate with the (longer) bristles.
Preferably there is a short bristle at the center of each group of four longer bristles, except at the periphery of the brush, and lines of shorter and longer bristles alternate, the bristles being offset relative to those in adjacent lines.
The free ends of the longer bristles define a (first) surface, and desirably said first surface is curved, the better to conform to the shape of a human head. A greater contact area between the bristles and the head is thus more easily achieved.
It is to be understood that the shorter length bristles need not be all of the same length, and similarly the longer bristles need not be all of the same length. However it is desirable for ease of manufacture that the respective kinds of bristles are all of the same length.
Advantageously, said first surface is concave.
Most preferably the body is shaped, on the area where said bristles reside to be curved and preferably concave, so that it corresponds to the shape of said first surface defined by said free ends of said longer bristles.
The free ends of the shorter bristles also define a second surface, and most preferably the second surface is arranged to be curved and preferably concave, and preferably spaced from said surface by a uniform distance.
Preferably, the body is shaped to fit the palm of a user's hand.
Desirably, the body is provided with a depressed portion to accommodate a thumb of a user.
The body is preferably in two parts, a first raised portion to fit in the palm of a user's hand and a second part attached to the first part and mounting said bristles.
Preferably the bristles are thicker at their base, nearer the brush body, than at their free ends. They may be tapered, or in two or more distinct sections of different thickness. One or more of said sections may be tapered.
Desirably the longer bristles are each in two slightly tapered sections, the thinner section of the longer bristles commencing at a distance from the body such that the longer bristles have a tendency to flex in use at a point approximately at the region of the free ends of the shorter bristles. The plastics material chosen for the bristles must be such that the bristles are resilient and after flexing in use return to their (unflexed) rest position.
The device according to the invention is particularly useful in the application of hair treatment materials, such as colorants to the hair, enabling such treatment materials to be applied uniformly and quickly to the hair.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In the hair care device shown in
Longer bristles 12a and shorter bristles 12b interspersed with the longer bristles 12a. These are shown in more detail in
Body Part 10a Polypropylene Copolymer
Body part 10b Engineering thermoplastics elastomer such as HYTREL® (trade mark) made by Messrs Dupont, and in particular HYTREL® 6356 (thermoplastic polyester elastomer)
Filaments 12a, 12b Engineering thermoplastics elastomer such as HYTREL® (trade mark) made by Messrs Dupont, and in particular HYTREL® 6356 (thermoplastic polyester elastomer).
It will be seen from
It is to be noted that embodiment shown is designed for comfortable use in a right hand, and the top part 10a is shaped to fit a user's hand, having an indented portion 10d designed to receive the thumb of a user, and a further indented portion 10e designed to receive a user's finger to enhance control of movement of the device in a comfortable fashion. A mirror-image version may be provided for use by a left-handed person.
Both sizes of bristles have a chamfer 14 at their base which helps give a firm support at the base of the bristles. Because the thicknesses (about 0.0007-0.001 meters) of the teeth are so fine, without these chamfers stresses on the bristles would be transferred to the base causing the bristles to break off at their base.
The bristles are tapered. This determines where along the length of the bristle it is likely to bend. The bristles must be flexible for ease of detangling the hair. They must also be able to return to their rest position and therefore must have resilience. The taper allows a spring-like movement of the bristles that plays a key role in detangling the hair.
The longer bristles have two tapered sections per bristle and this allows the point at which the bristle will bend occur—nearer the free-end than if there were only one taper.
The shorter length bristles only have one taper therefore the point at which these bristles will bend does not occur as close to their free ends as with the longer bristles even when the ratio of the two different lengths is taken into account
The points at which the two bristle lengths bend is important, so that in use of the device, it is applied to the head and gentle pressure is applied towards the head the longer bristles will bend sideways initially whereupon the shorter bristles will come into more intimate contact with the hair.
When the longer bristles have flexed and bent and are no longer capable of picking up any more hair, it is then that the shorter bristles start to catch further strands of hair. This will give two independent actions to detangle the hair that are both working at the same time.
Therefore, the short bristle length needs to correspond to the length to the point of bend of the long bristles or slightly less.
The teeth of conventional combs are rigid and not flexible, and conventional brushes tend to have rigid teeth that are attached to a resilient type base to give pivotability to the teeth but the individual teeth still tend to be rigid. Bristles used in brushes are more flexible and again set on a resilient/rubber type base and usually in a conventional format of a set amount of bristles in a bunch set into the base at regular intervals. The bristles are not generally tapered and just pivot from side to side. When these bristles come into contact with tangled hair they tend to compact the tangles together therefore adding to the problem and reducing the hair's own natural ability to de-tangle itself. Continuing in this manner to remove the tangles results in hair breakage and hair loss (not to be confused with natural hair loss at the root).
The base of the device is preferably concave unlike known brushes or combs to follow the natural contour of the head, to give a more precise direct contact at the roots over a larger surface area. When used on tangle-free hair it ensures the hair stays tangle free and reduces the risk of tangles reforming again
The device of the invention can also be used to apply different types of hair treatment materials 9 such as colorants) to the hair, the concave formation of the bristles helps to ensure that the chosen material is evenly distributed from the root right through to the ends of the hair.
Manufacturers of hair color recommend that the hair is not combed while treatment materials, especially colorants are on the hair, as this tends to form tangles in the hair due to combination of the coloring product and the conventional rigid teeth/bristles of the known devices. Generally, to try to remove these tangles and ensure that the hair color is evenly distributed they recommend the use of a coloring brush and the operatives hands. This method can be time consuming and does not guarantee even and complete coverage of the hair with the product
Also, manufacturers of hair colorants require that the colorant remains on the hair for a precise set length of time and that they should not to be left on the hair any longer than a stated maximum time before removal. Within this stated time interval the hair may need to be subjected to additional color services or treatments. Some of these additional services may not be capable of being completed, within this time interval and so it may be difficult to make sure that all the hair has been coated evenly from the roots to the ends with the colorant. The time taken to complete these additional services varies from client to client depending on the length of the hair and condition, and often takes far longer to complete than the time interval set by the material manufacturers, who set these time intervals and issue guide lines to try to guarantee optimum hair color results when using their products.
If hair coloring products remain on the hair longer than the manufacturers stated times, this may well affect the final color results achieved, for example that the hair color result is different to the one manufacturer stated would be achieved, and the consequent dissatisfaction/liability problems. Manufacturers generally accept no responsibility for the final color if their stated times and guide lines are not adhered to.
The device according to the invention can be used to distribute color evenly and quickly without tangling, and is particularly useful in distributing hair color evenly from the root to the ends of the hair quickly when usually time-consuming additional color services are required whilst a timed first-color application is in progress, so that these additional services can be completed within the manufacturers time scale for the first application.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0705570 | Mar 2007 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D183758 | Furter | Oct 1876 | S |
502513 | Giesecke | Aug 1893 | A |
2380730 | Demyanovich | Jul 1945 | A |
2607064 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 1952 | A |
D169131 | Fay | Mar 1953 | S |
2889567 | Solomon | Jun 1959 | A |
3128487 | Vallis | Apr 1964 | A |
3181540 | Abraham | May 1965 | A |
3727260 | Spydevold | Apr 1973 | A |
3949765 | Vallis | Apr 1976 | A |
4014064 | Okazaki | Mar 1977 | A |
4211217 | Gueret | Jul 1980 | A |
4287898 | Konesky | Sep 1981 | A |
4325392 | Iten et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4475563 | Martin | Oct 1984 | A |
4488328 | Hyman | Dec 1984 | A |
4619012 | Wachtel | Oct 1986 | A |
4694525 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4984590 | Bachtell | Jan 1991 | A |
5165760 | Gueret | Nov 1992 | A |
5191907 | Hirzel | Mar 1993 | A |
5524319 | Avidor | Jun 1996 | A |
5673710 | Schaefer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5755242 | Denebeim | May 1998 | A |
5860432 | Gueret | Jan 1999 | A |
6006395 | Tiramani | Dec 1999 | A |
6308717 | Vrtaric | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6357075 | Kaizuka | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6772467 | Weihrauch | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7000618 | Dovergne et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044138 | Brown | May 2006 | B2 |
7234472 | Ramet | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7650893 | De Laforcade | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8051525 | Bernat | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20030163884 | Weihrauch | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050028834 | Ramet | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050210614 | Chang | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070022551 | Kuo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080110471 | Oliver | May 2008 | A1 |
20100101594 | Pulfrey | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
22811645 | May 1998 | CN |
2622161 | Dec 1977 | DE |
3532734 | Apr 1986 | DE |
00042486-0040 | Nov 2003 | EM |
0 276 969 | Aug 1988 | EP |
1922952 | May 2008 | EP |
169707 | Oct 1971 | ES |
2017154 | Jan 1991 | ES |
1028873 | Sep 1995 | ES |
2216419 | Mar 2001 | ES |
2204642 | Apr 2002 | ES |
2424003 | Nov 1979 | FR |
630648 | Oct 1949 | GB |
686416 | Jan 1953 | GB |
44-021890 | Sep 1969 | JP |
62-016321 | Jan 1987 | JP |
10127344 | May 1988 | JP |
04-095727 | Aug 1992 | JP |
2000350619 | Dec 2000 | JP |
200170045 | Mar 2001 | JP |
466044 | Dec 1991 | SE |
8800446 | Jan 1988 | WO |
2007010058 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
CPME0943525P—Chinese request for the invalidation; petitioner Guangzhou Yingman Investment Management Co., Ltd., dated Sep. 4, 2019. |
International Search Report published Oct. 2, 2008 for PCT/GB2008/000580 filed Feb. 20, 2008. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/GB2008/000580 filed Feb. 20, 2008. |
British Search Report completed Jul. 11, 2007 for Great Britain Application No. GB0705570.0. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 29, 2009 for PCT/GB2008/000580. |
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2013 for patent application No. 2009-554077. |
Australian Examination Report dated Feb. 24, 2012 for Australian Patent Application No. 2008231617. |
Australian Examination Report dated Oct. 23, 2012 for Australian Patent Application No. 2008231617. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230053927 A1 | Feb 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16824622 | Mar 2020 | US |
Child | 17978374 | US | |
Parent | 14977739 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 16824622 | US | |
Parent | 12531765 | US | |
Child | 14977739 | US |