Hair conditioner compositions with a preservative system containing sodium benzoate and glycols and/or glyceryl esters

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11896693
  • Patent Number
    11,896,693
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 1, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 13, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
A hair conditioner composition containing an aqueous carrier, a cationic surfactant, a high melting point fatty compound and an effective preservation system. The conditioner composition comprises a gel network. The preservation system contains sodium benzoate and a second composition selected from the group consisting of glycol, glyceryl ester, and combinations thereof.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to hair conditioner compositions, more particularly to hair conditioner compositions comprising a surfactant system that includes sodium benzoate and glycols and/or glyceryl esters.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A variety of approaches have been developed to condition the hair. These approaches range from post-shampoo application of hair conditioners such as leave-on and rinse-off products, to hair conditioning shampoos which attempt to both clean and condition the hair from a single product.


Although some consumers prefer the ease and convenience of a shampoo which includes conditioners, a substantial proportion of consumers prefer the more conventional conditioner formulations which are applied to the hair as a separate step from shampooing, usually subsequent to shampooing. Conditioning formulations can be in the form of rinse-off products or leave-on products, and can be in the form of an emulsion, cream, gel, spray, and mousse. Such consumers who prefer the conventional conditioner formulations value the relatively higher conditioning effect, or convenience of changing the amount of conditioning depending on the condition of hair or amount of hair.


It is known that conditioning compositions, like most cosmetic products, contain preservatives to prevent product spoilage by microorganisms. Preservatives can help keep the product stable throughout the life of the product including during shipping, handling, storage, and while the consumer is using the product. During use, the consumer can inadvertently introduce microorganisms as they open and close the aqueous product and these microorganisms can proliferate in the warm, humid environment of the shower. Therefore, cosmetic products generally contain preservation systems. Common preservatives in conditioner products can include isothiazolinones, parabens, benzyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and salts thereof.


However, some consumers want cosmetic products with preservation systems that are EWG VERIFIED™, do not contain any of the ingredients that Whole Foods® lists as unacceptable, and is categorized as “risk-free” (green dot) by the Yuka® Application. Modifying the preservation system to reduce or eliminate certain preservatives can have a negative impact on microbiological safety requirements.


Therefore, there is a need for a conditioner composition with an effective preservation system that that is EWG VERIFIED™, does not contain any of the ingredients that Whole Foods® Market lists as unacceptable, and is categorized as “risk-free” by the Yuka® Application.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A hair conditioner composition comprising: (a) from about 50% to about 95% of an aqueous carrier, by weight of the composition; (b) from about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % of a cationic surfactant; (c) from about 1.5 wt % to about 15 wt % of a high melting point fatty compound; (d) a preservation system comprising: (i) from about 0.1% to about 0.5% sodium benzoate, by weight of the composition; (ii) from about 0.3% to about 1.5% of a second composition selected from the group consisting of glycol, glyceryl ester, and combinations thereof; wherein the ratio of sodium benzoate to the second composition is from about 1:4 to about 1:1; wherein the conditioner composition comprises a gel network.


A hair conditioner composition comprising: (a) from about 50% to about 95% of an aqueous carrier, by weight of the composition; (b) from about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % of a cationic surfactant selected from the group consisting of wherein the cationic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of behenamidopropyl dimethylamine (BAPDMA), behentrimonium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, and combinations thereof; (c) from about 1.5 wt % to about 15 wt % of a fatty alcohol selected from the group consisting of cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, behenyl alcohol, brassica alcohol; (d) a preservation system comprising: (i) from about 0.1% to less than 0.4% sodium benzoate, by weight of the composition; (ii) from about 0.3% to about 1.5% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of glycols can include butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, decylene glycol, and mixtures thereof; wherein the ratio of sodium benzoate to the glycol is less than 1:1; wherein the conditioner composition comprises a gel network.


A hair conditioner composition comprising: (a) from about 50% to about 95% of an aqueous carrier, by weight of the composition; (b) from about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % of a cationic surfactant selected from the group consisting of wherein the cationic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of behenamidopropyl dimethylamine (BAPDMA), behentrimonium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, and combinations thereof; (c) from about 1.5 wt % to about 15 wt % of a fatty alcohol selected from the group consisting of cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, behenyl alcohol, brassica alcohol; (d) a preservation system comprising: (i) from about 0.1% to less than 0.4% sodium benzoate, by weight of the composition; (ii) from about 0.3% to about 1.5% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of glycols can include butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, decylene glycol, and mixtures thereof; wherein the ratio of sodium benzoate to the glycol is less than 1:1; wherein the conditioner composition comprises a gel network.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter of the present invention, it is believed that the invention can be more readily understood from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a photograph of the conditioner composition of Comparative Example 10, which contains 1 wt % sodium benzoate and has a clumpy and grainy appearance;



FIG. 2 is a photograph of the conditioner composition of Comparative Example 11, which contains 2 wt % sodium benzoate and has a thin and grainy appearance;



FIG. 3 is a photograph of the conditioner composition of Example 1, which contains 0.20 wt % sodium benzoate and 0.40 wt % caprylyl glycol.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the invention, it is believed that the present invention will be better understood from the following description.


Hair conditioners are used to improve the feel, appearance, and manageability of the hair. Hair conditioning compositions generally include a cationic surfactant, high melting point fatty compound(s) having a melting point of greater than 25° C. and in some examples from 40 to 85° C., and an aqueous carrier. Conditioning compositions also include a safe and effective preservation system to prevent the growth of microbes under regular storage and usage conditions. Common preservatives in conditioner products can include isothiazolinones (including methylisothiazolinone and a mixture of methylisothiazolinone and methylchloroisothiazolinone (commercially available as Kathon™ from Dow®), parabens (including Germaben®, methylparben, propylparaben, butylparaben, and phenoxyethanols, which are commercially available in Optiphen™ and Optiphen™ Plus from Ashland™), benzyl alcohol, and phenoxyethanol. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and salts thereof including disodium EDTA, calcium disodium EDTA, and tetrasodium EDTA, are also frequently used in hair care compositions as a chelator that can also improve product performance and stability.


However, there is growing demand from some consumeres for a conditioner product and/or a preservation system that meets at least one, two, or all three of the following standards:

    • EWG VERIFIED™ (according to the criteria, as of Nov. 25, 2019), which includes meeting the Environmental Working Group's (EWG) criteria including avoiding EWG's ingredients of concern, having fully transparent labeling, and using good manufacturing practices, in addition to other criteria described in EWG's Licensing Criteria: Personal Care Products (2019).
    • Does not contain any of ingredients that Whole Foods® lists as unacceptable lists as unacceptable in its Premium Body Care Unacceptable Ingredients (July 2018)
    • Categorized as “risk-free” (green dot) by the Yuka® Application (March 2019)


However, replacing traditional preservatives with preservatives that meet the standards, listed above, while maintaining antimicrobial effectiveness and product performance can be challenging. Table 1 and Table 2, below, include examples that have a sodium benzoate preservative, which meets the standards. However, if the conditioner composition had a smooth and creamy consistency, then the level of sodium benzoate was too low to effectively inhibit the growth of microbes. When the level of sodium benzoate was increased, the conditioner composition was too thin to easily apply with a user's hands, which can significantly impact product performance and the usage experience. As shown in Table 3 and described in accompanying text, a preservation system with sodium benzoate and a glycol, such as caprylyl glycol, or glyceryl esters, such as glyceryl caprylate/caprate and glyceryl caprylate (and) glyceryl undecylenate can be effective if the proper levels of each ingredient are added. It was found that a preservation system that contains sodium benzoate and a second composition selected from the group consisting of glycols, glyceryl esters, and combinations thereof contains all of the ingredients that have a EWG rating score of equal to or less than 3, can be EWG VERIFIED™, may not contain any of the ingredients that Whole Foods® Market lists as unacceptable, and can categorized as “risk-free” by the Yuka® Application, can maintain antimicrobial effectiveness, and can provide good conditioning performance. In some examples, the preservation system and/or the conditioner can also meet the COSMOS-standard (Jan. 1, 2019). The conditioner compositions containing this preservation system can have a uniform, smooth, creamy appearance and have an effective preservation system where the level of microbes (both bacteria and fungi) is undetectable (>99.99% reduction) as determined by the Bacterial and Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Test Methods, as described herein.


The second composition can contain a glycol and/or a glyceryl ester. Glycols and glyceryl esters both have two —OH groups on the molecule. Non-limiting examples of glycols can include butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, decylene glycol (1,2-decanedioi) and mixtures thereof. In one example, the glycol can be carpylyl Non-limiting examples of glycerol esters can include glyceryl caprylate, glyceryl caprate, glyceryl undecylenate and mixtures thereof.


The conditioner composition and/or preservation system can be free of or substantially free of certain preservatives, in particular preservatives that do not meet one or more of the standards, such as isothiazolinones including 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (commercially available as Kathon™ CG from Dow®), benzyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, cyclohexylglycerin, and/or parabens. The conditioner composition can be free of or substantially free of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and salts thereof. In addition to meeting the standards for a cationic surfactant and preservation system, some consumers prefer a conditioner composition that is free of or substantially free of the following: silicone, propellants, phthalates, parabens, isothiazolinones (e.g. Kathon™), phenoxyethanols, dyes, sulfates, and/or formaldehyde donors. The conditioner composition can also be vegan.


The conditioner composition can contain from about 0.2 wt % to about 1.5 wt % preservation system, alternatively from about 0.3 wt % to about 1.25 wt % preservation system, alternatively from about 0.4 wt % to about 1 wt % preservation system, alternatively from 0.5 wt % to about 0.8 wt % preservation system, and alternatively from about 0.6 wt % to about 0.8 wt % preservation system.


The conditioner composition can contain from about 0.05 wt % to about 0.8 wt % sodium benzoate, alternatively 0.1 wt % to about 0.5 wt % sodium benzoate, alternatively from about 0.2 wt % to about 0.4 wt % sodium benzoate. The conditioner composition can contain sodium benzoate and can contain less than 2% sodium benzoate, alternatively less than 1.5% sodium benzoate, alternatively less than 1% sodium benzoate, alternatively less than 0.8% sodium benzoate, alternatively less than 0.6 wt % sodium benzoate, and alternatively less than 0.5% sodium benzoate.


The preservation system can contain from about 20% to about 50% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system, alternatively from about 25% to about 50% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system, from about 30% to about 50% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system, and from about 30% to about 40% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system.


The conditioner composition can contain from about 0.3 wt % to about 1.5 wt % of a second composition, alternatively from about 0.32 wt % to about 1 wt %, alternatively from about 0.33 wt % to about 0.8 wt %, alternatively from about 0.34 wt % to about 0.6 wt %, alternatively from about 0.35 wt % to about 0.5 wt %, alternatively from about 0.37 wt % to about 0.45 wt %, and alternatively from about 0.38 wt % to about 0.43 wt %. If the conditioner composition contains too much glycol and/or glyceryl ester the gel network structure may be destroyed, and the conditioner will not have consumer acceptable rheology and/or performance.


The preservation system can contain from about 50% to about 80% of the second composition, by weight of the preservation system, alternatively from about 50% to about 75%, by weight of the preservation system, alternatively from about 50% to about 70%, by weight of the preservation system, and alternatively from about 50% to about 67%, by weight of the preservation system.


The weight ratio of sodium benzoate to the second composition can be from about 1:4 to about 1:1, alternatively from about 1:3 to about 1:1, alternatively from about 1:2 to about 1:1, and from about 1:1.7 to about 1:1.


The conditioner composition can have a shear stress from about 50 Pa to about 500 Pa, alternatively from about 75 Pa to about 450 Pa, from about 100 Pa to about 400 Pa, from about 125 Pa to about 375 Pa, from about 130 Pa, to about 350 Pa, and from about 135 Pa to about 325 Pa. The shear stress can be determined using the Shear Stress Test Method, described hereafter.


The conditioner composition can have a pH of less than 5. Alternatively, the conditioner composition can have a pH from about 2.5 to about 5, alternatively from about 3.5 to about 4.5. The pH can be determined using the pH Test Method, described hereafter.


As used herein, the articles including “a” and “an” when used in a claim, are understood to mean one or more of what is claimed or described.


As used herein, “comprising” means that other steps and other ingredients which do not affect the end result can be added. This term encompasses the terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of.”


As used herein, the terms “include,” “includes,” and “including,” are meant to be non-limiting and are understood to mean “comprise,” “comprises,” and “comprising,” respectively.


As used herein, the term “free of” means that 0% of an ingredient was intentionally added to the conditioner composition, or the conditioner composition comprises 0% of an ingredient by total weight of the composition, thus no detectable amount of the stated ingredient.


The term “substantially free of” as used herein means less than 0.5%, less than 0.3%, less than 0.1%, less than 0.05%, less than 0.01%, or less than an immaterial amount of a stated ingredient by total weight of the composition.


As used herein, “mixtures” is meant to include a simple combination of materials and any compounds that may result from their combination.


All percentages, parts and ratios are based upon the total weight of the compositions of the present invention, unless otherwise specified. All such weights as they pertain to listed ingredients are based on the active level and, therefore, do not include carriers or by-products that may be included in commercially available materials.


Unless otherwise noted, all component or composition levels are in reference to the active portion of that component or composition, and are exclusive of impurities, for example, residual solvents or by-products, which may be present in commercially available sources of such components or compositions.


It should be understood that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this specification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this specification will include every higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.


Cationic Surfactant


The compositions of the present invention can comprise a cationic surfactant. The cationic surfactant can be included in the composition at a level of from about 0.1%, alternatively from about 0.5%, alternatively from about 0.8%, alternatively from about 1.0%, and to about 20%, alternatively to about 10%, alternatively to about 8.0%, alternatively to about 6.0% by weight of the composition, in view of providing the benefits of the present invention.


The surfactant can be water-insoluble. In the present invention, “water-insoluble surfactants” means that the surfactants have a solubility in water at 25° C. of alternatively below 0.5 g/100 g (excluding 0.5 g/100 g) water, alternatively 0.3 g/100 g water or less.


Cationic surfactant can be one cationic surfactant or a mixture of two or more cationic surfactants. Alternatively, the cationic surfactant is selected from: a mono-long alkyl amine; a di-long alkyl quaternized ammonium salt; a mono-long alkyl cationic neutralized amino acid esters; a combination of a mono-long alkyl amine and a di-long alkyl quaternized ammonium salt; and a combination of a mono-long alkyl amine and a mono-long alkyl cationic neutralized amino acid esters.


In some examples, the conditioner composition can be substantially free of or free of cationic surfactants that have a quaternized ammonium salt.


Mono-Long Alkyl Amine


Mono-long alkyl amine can include those having one long alkyl chain of alternatively from 19 to 30 carbon atoms, alternatively from 19 to 24 carbon atoms, alternatively from 20 to 24 carbon atoms, alternatively from 20 to 22 alkyl group. Mono-long alkyl amines can include mono-long alkyl amidoamines Primary, secondary, and tertiary fatty amines can be used.


Tertiary amido amines having an alkyl group of from about 19 to about 22 carbons. Exemplary tertiary amido amines include: behenamidopropyldimethylamine, behenamidopropyldiethylamine, behenamidoethyldiethylamine, behenamidoethyldimethylamine, brassicamidopropyldimethylamine, brassicamidopropyldiethylamine, brassicamidoethyldiethylamine, brassicamidoethyldimethylamine Amines in the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,275,055, Nachtigal, et al.


In some examples, the conditioner composition can be substantially free of or free of stearamidopropyldimethylamine, stearamidopropyldiethylamine, stearamidoethyldiethylamine, stearamidoethyldimethylamine, palmitamidopropyldimethyl amine, palmitamidopropyldiethylamine, palmitamidoethyldiethylamine, palmitamidoethyldimethylamine, arachidamidopropyldimethylamine, arachidamidopropyldiethyl amine, arachidamidoethyldiethylamine, arachidamidoethyldimethylamine, and/or diethylaminoethylstearamide.


These amines are used in combination with acids such as 1-glutamic acid, lactic acid, hydrochloric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, acetic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, 1-glutamic hydrochloride, maleic acid, and mixtures thereof; alternatively 1-glutamic acid, lactic acid, citric acid, at a molar ratio of the amine to the acid of from about 1:0.3 to about 1:2, alternatively from about 1:0.4 to about 1:1.


In some examples, the conditioner composition can be free of mono long alkyl quaternized ammonium salts.


Di-Long Alkyl Quaternized Ammonium Salts


When used, di-long alkyl quaternized ammonium salts are alternatively combined with a mono-long alkyl quaternized ammonium salt and/or mono-long alkyl amine salt, at the weight ratio of from 1:1 to 1:5, alternatively from 1:1.2 to 1:5, alternatively from 1:1.5 to 1:4, in view of stability in rheology and conditioning benefits.


Di-long alkyl quaternized ammonium salts can have two long alkyl chains of from 12 to 30 carbon atoms, alternatively from 16 to 24 carbon atoms, alternatively from 18 to 22 carbon atoms. Such di-long alkyl quaternized ammonium salts can have the formula (I):




embedded image



wherein two of R71, R72, R73 and R74 are selected from an aliphatic group of from 12 to 30 carbon atoms, alternatively from 16 to 24 carbon atoms, alternatively from 18 to 22 carbon atoms or an aromatic, alkoxy, polyoxyalkylene, alkylamido, hydroxyalkyl, aryl or alkylaryl group having up to about 30 carbon atoms; the remainder of R71, R72, R73 and R74 are independently selected from an aliphatic group of from 1 to about 8 carbon atoms, alternatively from 1 to 3 carbon atoms or an aromatic, alkoxy, polyoxyalkylene, alkylamido, hydroxyalkyl, aryl or alkylaryl group having up to about 8 carbon atoms; and X is a salt-forming anion selected from the group consisting of halides such as chloride and bromide, C1-C4 alkyl sulfate such as methosulfate and ethosulfate, and mixtures thereof. The aliphatic groups can contain, in addition to carbon and hydrogen atoms, ether linkages, and other groups such as amino groups. The longer chain aliphatic groups, e.g., those of about 16 carbons, or higher, can be saturated or unsaturated. Alternatively, two of R71, R72, R73 and R74 are selected from an alkyl group of from 12 to 30 carbon atoms, alternatively from 16 to 24 carbon atoms, alternatively from 18 to 22 carbon atoms; and the remainder of R71, R72, R73 and R74 are independently selected from CH3, C2H5, C2H4OH, CH2C6H5, and mixtures thereof.


Di-long alkyl cationic surfactants can include, for example, dialkyl (14-18) dimethyl ammonium chloride, ditallow alkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, dihydrogenated tallow alkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, distearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, and dicetyl dimethyl ammonium chloride.


High Melting Point Fatty Compound


The composition of the present invention comprises a high melting point fatty compound. The high melting point fatty compound can be included in the composition at a level of from about 1.0%, alternatively from about 1.5%, alternatively from about 2.0%, alternatively from about 2.5%, even alternatively from about 3%, and to about 30%, alternatively to about 15%, alternatively to about 8.0%, alternatively to about 7% by weight of the composition, in view of providing the benefits of the present invention.


The high melting point fatty compound can have a melting point of 25° C. or higher, alternatively 40° C. or higher, alternatively 45° C. or higher, alternatively 47° C. or higher, alternatively 49° C. or higher, in view of stability of the emulsion especially the gel network. Alternatively, such melting point is up to about 90° C., alternatively up to about 80° C., alternatively up to about 75° C., even alternatively up to about 71° C., in view of easier manufacturing and easier emulsification. In the present invention, the high melting point fatty compound can be used as a single compound or as a blend or mixture of at least two high melting point fatty compounds. When used as such blend or mixture, the above melting point means the melting point of the blend or mixture.


The high melting point fatty compound can be selected from the group consisting of fatty alcohols, fatty acids, and mixtures thereof. Further, it is understood by the artisan that, depending on the number and position of double bonds, and length and position of the branches, certain compounds having certain required carbon atoms may have a melting point of less than the above preferred in the present invention. Such compounds of low melting point are not intended to be included in this section. Nonlimiting examples of the high melting point compounds are found in International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, Fifth Edition, 1993, and CTFA Cosmetic Ingredient Handbook, Second Edition, 1992.


Among a variety of high melting point fatty compounds, fatty alcohols are alternatively used in the composition of the present invention. The fatty alcohols can have from about 14 to about 30 carbon atoms, alternatively from about 16 to about 22 carbon atoms. These fatty alcohols are saturated and can be straight or branched chain alcohols.


Fatty alcohols can include, for example, cetyl alcohol (having a melting point of about 56° C.), stearyl alcohol (having a melting point of about 58-59° C.), behenyl alcohol (having a melting point of about 71° C.), and mixtures thereof. These compounds are known to have the above melting point. However, they often have lower melting points when supplied, since such supplied products are often mixtures of fatty alcohols having alkyl chain length distribution in which the main alkyl chain is cetyl, stearyl, brassica or behenyl group.


The fatty alcohol can be a mixture of cetyl alcohol and stearyl alcohol.


Generally, in the mixture, the weight ratio of cetyl alcohol to stearyl alcohol is alternatively from about 1:9 to 9:1, alternatively from about 1:4 to about 4:1, alternatively from about 1:2.3 to about 1.5:1.


When using higher level of total cationic surfactant and high melting point fatty compounds, the mixture has the weight ratio of cetyl alcohol to stearyl alcohol of alternatively from about 1:1 to about 4:1, alternatively from about 1:1 to about 2:1, alternatively from about 1.2:1 to about 2:1, in view of avoiding to get too thick for spreadability. It may also provide more conditioning on damaged part of the hair.


Aqueous Carrier


The composition of the present invention can include an aqueous carrier. The level and species of the carrier can be selected according to the compatibility with other components, and other desired characteristic of the product.


The carrier can include water and water solutions of lower alkyl alcohols. The lower alkyl alcohols can be monohydric alcohols having 1 to 6 carbons, alternatively ethanol and isopropanol.


Alternatively, the aqueous carrier is substantially water. Deionized water is alternatively used. Water from natural sources including mineral cations can also be used, depending on the desired characteristic of the product. Generally, the compositions of the present invention comprise from about 40% to about 99%, alternatively from about 50% to about 95%, and alternatively from about 70% to about 93%, and alternatively from about 80% to about 92% water.


Gel Network


The gel network composition can be included in conditioner compositions to provide conditioning benefits, including improved wet feel of the hair after rinsing the conditioner. As used herein, the term “gel network” refers to a lamellar or vesicular solid crystalline phase which comprises at least one high melting point fatty compound, such as a fatty alcohol, as specified below, at least one surfactant, in particular a cationic surfactant, as specified below, and water or other suitable solvents. The lamellar or vesicular phase comprises bi-layers made up of a first layer comprising the high melting point fatty compound and the surfactant and alternating with a second layer comprising the water or other suitable solvent. Gel networks, generally, are further described by G. M. Eccleston, “Functions of Mixed Emulsifiers and Emulsifying Waxes in Dermatological Lotions and Creams”, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochem. and Eng. Aspects 123-124 (1997) 169-182; and by G. M Eccleston, “The Microstructure of Semisolid Creams”, Pharmacy International, Vol. 7, 63-70 (1986).


A gel network can be formed by the cationic surfactant, the high melting point fatty compound, and an aqueous carrier. The gel network is suitable for providing various conditioning benefits, such as slippery feel during the application to wet hair and softness and moisturized feel on dry hair.


Alternatively, when the gel network is formed, the cationic surfactant and the high melting point fatty compound are contained at a level such that the weight ratio of the cationic surfactant to the high melting point fatty compound is in the range of, alternatively from about 1:1 to about 1:10, alternatively from about 1:1.5 to about 1:7, alternatively from about 1:2 to about 1:6, in view of providing improved wet conditioning benefits.


Alternatively, especially when the gel network is formed, the composition of the present invention is substantially free of anionic surfactants, in view of stability of the gel network. In the present invention, “the composition being substantially free of anionic surfactants” means that: the composition is free of anionic surfactants; or, if the composition contains anionic surfactants, the level of such anionic surfactants is very low. In the present invention, a total level of such anionic surfactants, if included, alternatively 1% or less, alternatively 0.5% or less, alternatively 0.1% or less by weight of the composition. Most alternatively, the total level of such anionic surfactants is 0% by weight of the composition.


Additional Components


The composition of the present invention may include other additional components, which may be selected by the artisan according to the desired characteristics of the final product and which are suitable for rendering the composition more cosmetically or aesthetically acceptable or to provide them with additional usage benefits. Such other additional components generally are used individually at levels of from about 0.001% to about 10%, alternatively up to about 5% by weight of the composition.


A wide variety of other additional components can be formulated into the present compositions. These include: other conditioning agents such as aloe vera gel; aloe barbadensis leaf juice; Ecklonia radiata extract; natural oils and waxes with shea butter, safflower oil, cocoa butter, orange peel wax, olive oil, macadamia seed oil, Oenothera biennis oil, Crambe abyssinica see oil, argon oil, camelina oil, sunflower oil, almond oil, argania spinosa kernel oil, grape see oil, jojoba oil, coconut oil, meadowfoam seed oil, neem oil, linseed oil, castor oil, soybean oil, sesame oil, beeswax, sunflower wax, candelilla wax, rice bran wax, carnauba wax, bayberry wax and soy wax; essential oils such as lime peel oil, lavender oil, peppermint oil, cedarwood oil, tea tree oil, ylang-ylang oil and coensage oil which can be used in fragrance; hydrolyzed collagen with tradename Peptein 2000 available from Hormel, vitamin E with tradename Emix-d available from Eisai, panthenol available from Roche, panthenyl ethyl ether available from Roche, hydrolyzed keratin, proteins, plant extracts, and nutrients; pH adjusting agents, such as citric acid, sodium citrate, succinic acid, phosphoric acid, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate; salts, in general, such as potassium acetate and sodium chloride; coloring agents, such as any of the FD&C or D&C dyes; perfumes; and sequestering agents, such as disodium ethylenediamine tetra-acetate; and ultraviolet and infrared screening and absorbing agents such as octyl salicylate; antioxidants include: rosemary, tocopherol, vitamin E, vitamin A, tea extracts, and hydroxyacetophenone (available as Symsave® H from Symrise®); amino acids include histidine, 1-arginine and others.


Test Methods

Bacterial Microbial Susceptibility Testing Method


Bacterial microbial susceptibility testing is used to assess the anti-bacterial effectiveness of the preservation system in cosmetic rinse-off conditioner.


A bacterial pool (mixture in equal volumes) of challenge organisms used in the test is comprised of standardized solutions of the bacterial strains Escherichia coli (ATCC#8739), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC#6538), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC#9027), Burkholderia cepacia (ATCC#25416), as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter gergoviae and Serratia marcescens strains isolated from cosmetic products. The bacterial pool is prepared to have a concentration of approximately 6-8 log cfu/ml. To start the test, 0.1 ml of the bacterial pool is added into 10.0 g of a test conditioner. The test conditioner is then incubated for 2 days at 20-25° C. After incubation, a 1.0 g aliquot of product is neutralized using Modified Letheen Broth containing 1.5% polysorbate 80 (commercially available as Tween® 80 from Croda™) and 1% Lecithin to aid in microbial recovery/enumeration. Then, multiple diluted concentrations of this sample are transferred into petri dishes containing Modified Letheen Agar with 1.5% Tween® 80, and the agar plates are incubated at least 2 days at 30-35° C. Bacterial colony forming units (cfus) are then enumerated, and a bacterial log reduction from the starting log cfu/g challenge level is reported.


A 1 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 90% bacterial reduction. A 2 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 99% bacterial reduction. A 3 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 99.9% bacterial reduction. A 4 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 99.99% bacterial reduction. Greater log cfu/g reduction values indicate greater antimicrobial robustness from the preservation system.


Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Testing Method:


Fungal microbial susceptibility testing is used to assess the anti-fungal effectiveness of the preservation system in cosmetic rinse-off conditioner.


Standardized ATCC strains of the yeast Candida albicans (ATCC#10231) and mold Aspergillus brasiliensis (frm. niger) (ATCC#16404) are mixed in 1:1 (v:v) ratio, and this fungal pool is used as inoculum in the test. The concentration of the fungal pool is approximately 6-8 log cfu/ml. To start the test, 0.1 ml of the fungal pool is added into 10.0 g of a testing conditioner. After the inoculated sample is incubated for 2 days at 20-25° C., a 1.0 g aliquot of product is neutralized using Modified Letheen Broth containing 1.5% Tween® 80 and 1% Lecithin to aid in microbial recovery/enumeration. Then, multiple diluted concentrations of this sample are transferred into petri dishes containing Modified Letheen Agar with 1.5% Tween 80, and the agar plates are incubated for at least 5 days at 20-25° C., at which time fungal colony forming units (cfus) are then enumerated, and a fungal log reduction from the starting log cfu/g challenge level is calculated.


A 1 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 90% fungal reduction. A 2 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 99% fungal reduction. A 3 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 99.9% fungal reduction. A 4 log cfu/g reduction equates to ˜a 99.99% fungal reduction. Greater log cfu/g reduction values indicate greater anti-fungal robustness from the preservation system.


Shear Stress


Shear stress is measured by shear rate sweep condition with a rheometer available from TA Instruments with a mode name of ARG2. Geometry has 40 mm diameter, 2° C. cone angle, and gap of 49 μm. Shear rate is logarithmically increased from 0 to 1200/s for 1 min, and temperature is kept at 26.7° C. Share stress at a high shear rate of 950/s is measured and defined above.


pH Method


First, calibrate the Mettler Toledo Seven Compact pH meter. Do this by turning on the pH meter and waiting for 30 seconds. Then take the electrode out of the storage solution, rinse the electrode with distilled water, and carefully wipe the electrode with a scientific cleaning wipe, such as a Kimiwipe®. Submerse the electrode in the pH 4 buffer and press the calibrate button. Wait until the pH icon stops flashing and press the calibrate button a second time. Rinse the electrode with distilled water and carefully wipe the electrode with a scientific cleaning wipe. Then submerse the electrode into the pH 7 buffer and press the calibrate button a second time. Wait until the pH icon stops flashing and press the calibrate button a third time. Rinse the electrode with distilled water and carefully wipe the electrode with a scientific cleaning wipe. Then submerse the electrode into the pH 10 buffer and press the calibrate button a third time. Wait until the pH icon stops flashing and press the measure button. Rinse the electrode with distilled water and carefully wipe with a scientific cleaning wipe.


Submerse the electrode into the testing sample and press the read button. Wait until the pH icon stops flashing and record the value.


EXAMPLES

The following are non-limiting examples of the conditioner compositions described herein. It will be appreciated that other modifications of the present invention within the skill of those in the art can be undertaken without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.


All parts, percentages, and ratios herein are by weight unless otherwise specified. Some components may come from suppliers as dilute solutions. The amount stated reflects the weight percent of the added material, unless otherwise specified.


The examples in Tables 1-3 were made as follows. Sodium benzoate and L-glutamic were dissolved in the water. The mixture was heated to 80° C. Then, the cationic surfactant and fatty alcohols were added to the mixture. Next, the mixture was cooled while the cationic surfactant and fatty alcohols continue to dissolve. Then, glycols or glyceryl esters were added, followed by oils and perfume when the temperature was below 45° C. The composition was cooled to room temperature to make the conditioner composition.


In Tables 1-3, below, the Micro˜Bacteria @ 2 days and the Micro-Fungi @ 2 days is determined by the Bacterial and Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Test Methods, described herein. In order for the preservation system to be effective, the level of microbes (bacteria and fungi) needs to be undetectable, which means that there is a greater than 99.99% reduction in microbes at two days as determined by the Bacterial and Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Test Methods. In Table 2, below, N/A indicates that the test was not performed.









TABLE 1







Comp. Examples 1-6














Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 3
Ex. 4
Ex. 5
Ex. 6












Appearance
Creamy and smooth













Sheer stress (Pa) @950
350
419
448
450
354
343


1/s









Micro - Bacteria @ 2
~90% reduction
Not Detectable (>99.99% reduction)


days









Micro - Fungi @ 2 days
~90% reduction
>99% reduction













Sodium Benzoate wt %

0.20
0.25
0.40
0.20
0.25


(active) 1


Caprylyl Glycol wt %




0.20
0.20


(active) 2


Behenamidopropyl
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74


Dimethylamine


(Cationic Surfactant)


wt % (active)6


L-Glutamic Acid wt %
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55


(active)7


Cetyl Alcohol (C16
3.83
3.83
3.83
3.83
3.83
3.83


Fatty alcohol) wt %


(active)8


Stearyl Alcohol (C18
2.84
2.84
2.84
2.84
2.84
2.84


Fatty Alcohol) wt %


(active)9


Citric Acid wt %
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.25
0.25
0.35


Distilled Water
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.


pH
3.9
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
















TABLE 2







Comparative Examples 7-11













Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



Ex. 7
Ex. 8
Ex. 9
Ex. 10
Ex. 11














Appearance
Creamy and smooth
Clumpy and
Thin and




grainy
grainy











Sheer stress (Pa) @950
270   
275   
271   
N/A


1/s









Micro - Bacteria @ 2
Not Detectable (>99.99% reduction)
N/A


day










Micro - Fungi @ 2 days
>90% reduction
>99% reduction
N/A












Sodium Benzoate wt %
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.00



(active)1


Caprylyl Glycol wt %




2.00


(active)2


Glyceryl
0.40






Caprylate/Caprate wt %


(active)3


Glyceryl Caprylate

0.40





(and) Glyceryl


Undecylenate wt %


(active)4


Behentrimonium


2.28




Chloride (Cationic


Surfactant) wt %


(active)5


Behenamidopropyl
3.74
3.74

3.74
3.74


Dimethylamine


(cationic surfactant)


wt % (active)6


L-Glutamic Acid wt %
1.55
1.55

1.55
1.55


(active)7


Cetyl Alcohol (C16
3.83
3.83
1.67
3.83
3.83


Fatty alcohol) wt %


(active)8


Stearyl Alcohol (C18
2.84
2.84
4.50
2.84
2.84


Fatty Alcohol) wt %


(active)9


Citric Acid
0.25
0.25
 0.035
1.25
0.25


Distilled Water
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.


pH
4  
4.1 
4.4 
4  
4.1 









Comparative Example 1 is the control and does not contain a preservation system. Comparative Example 1 does not provide enough microbe reduction at 2 days for bacteria and fungi.


Comparative Examples 2, 3, and 4 contain 0.20 wt %, 0.25 wt %, and 0.40 wt % sodium benzoate and these examples have an undetectable level (>99.99% reduction) of bacteria at two days. However, a preservation system that contains only sodium benzoate at these levels does not provide enough fungi reduction at two days, as these examples only have a ˜90% reduction.


Comparative Examples 5 and 6 include a preservation system that has both sodium benzoate and caprylyl glycol. These examples have an undetectable level (>99.99% reduction) of bacteria at two days. The combination of sodium benzoate and caprylyl glycol improves the reduction of fungi at 2 days, as compared to Comparative Examples 2, 3, and 4. However, there is still a detectable level of fungi and therefore the preservation system in these examples is not considered effective.


Comparative Example 7 has a preservation system with 0.20 wt % sodium benzoate and 0.40 wt % glyceryl caprylate/caprate (a glyceryl ester) and this example has an undetectable level (>99.99% reduction) of bacteria at two days. However, it has a >90% reduction in fungi at two days and is ineffective.


Similar to Comparative Example 7, Comparative Example 8 has a preservation system with 0.20 wt % sodium benzoate and 0.40 wt % glyceryl caprylate (and) glyceryl undeylenate and this example has an undetectable level (>99.99% reduction) of bacteria at two days. However, it has a >90% reduction in fungi at two days and is ineffective.


Comparative Example 9 contains 0.20% sodium benzoate and behentrimonium chloride (cationic surfactant) and this example has an undetectable level (>99.99% reduction) of bacteria at two days. However, it has a detectable level of fungi (>99% reduction) at two days and is therefore ineffective.


Comparative Example 10 contains 1 wt % sodium benzoate. As shown in FIG. 1, instead of being a smooth, creamy conditioner, it was clumpy and grainy, which is not consumer preferred. While not willing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the sodium benzoate level in this example is too high and since sodium benzoate is a salt, it effects the packing of the gel network. For example, in this example it is believed that some regions the gel network may be packed too tight and this can lead to the clumpy texture.


Comparative Example 11 contains 2 wt % caprylyl glycol. As shown in FIG. 2, instead of being a smooth, creamy conditioner, it was thin and crystalline appearance. A conditioner with this texture could be difficult for a consumer to apply with their hands and may not provide good conditioning. While not willing to e bound by theory, it is believed that if the level of glycol is too high, it acts like a solvent and breaks down the gel network.









TABLE 3







Examples 1-5













Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 3
Ex. 4
Ex. 5












Appearance
Creamy and smooth












Sheer stress (Pa) @950 1/s
304
302
289   
290   
141   








Micro - Bacteria @ 2 days
Not Detectable (>99.99% reduction)


Micro - Fungi @ 2 days
Not Detectable (>99.99% reduction)












Sodium Benzoate wt %
0.20
0.25
0.40
0.40
0.20


(active)1


Caprylyl Glycol wt %
0.40
0.40


0.40


(active)2


Glyceryl Caprylate/Caprate


0.40




wt % (active)3


Glyceryl Caprylate (and)



0.40



Glyceryl Undecylenate


wt % (active)4


Behentrimonium Chloride




2.28


(Cationic Surfactant) wt %


(active)5


Behenamidopropyl
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74



Dimethylamine (Cationic


Surfactant) wt % (active)6


L-Glutamic Acid wt %
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55



(active)7


Cetyl Alcohol (C16 Fatty
3.83
3.83
3.83
3.83
1.67


alcohol) wt % (active)8


Stearyl Alcohol (C18 Fatty
2.84
2.84
2.84
2.84
4.50


Alcohol) wt % (active)9


Citric Acid
0.25
0.35
0.25
0.25
 0.035


Distilled Water
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.
Q.S.


pH
4.2
4.2
4.1 
4.1 
4.4 






1Sodium Benzoate, available from Kalama ®




2Caprylyl Glycol, available from Procter and Gamble ®




3Glyceryl Caprylate/Caprate (STEPAN-MILD ® GCC), available from Stepan ®




4Glyceryl Caprylate (and) Glyceryl Undecylenate (Lexgard ® Natural), available from Index ®




5Behentrimonium Chloride/IPA (Genamin KDMP), available from Clariant ™ at 80% active level




6Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA) (Incromine ™ BD), available from Croda ®




7L-Glutamic Acid, available from Ajinomoto ®




8Cetyl alcohol, 95% active level available from Procter & Gamble ®




9Stearyl alcohol, 97% active level, available from Procter & Gamble ®







All of the Examples in Table 3 have preservation systems that are effective (i.e. bacteria and fungi are not detectable (>99.99% reduction) at 2 days) and a creamy and smooth appearance that is consumer preferred. FIG. 3 is a photograph of Example 1 that shows the smooth and creamy appearance of the conditioner composition. These examples have between 0.20-0.40 wt % sodium benzoate and 0.40 wt % caprylyl glycol, glyceryl caprylate/caprate, or glyceryl caprylate (and) glyceryl undecylenate. The weight ratio of sodium benzoate to caprylyl glycol, glyceryl caprylate/caprate, or glyceryl caprylate (and) glyceryl undecylenate is from about 1:2 to about 1:1.


All of the Examples in Table 3 have a creamy and smooth appearance that can be consumer preferred.


Combinations:

    • A. A hair conditioner composition comprising:
      • a. an aqueous carrier;
      • b. a cationic surfactant;
      • c. a high melting point fatty compound;
      • d. a preservation system comprising:
        • i. sodium benzoate;
        • ii. a second composition selected from the group consisting of glycol, glyceryl ester, and combinations thereof;
          • wherein the conditioner composition comprises a gel network.
    • B. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraph A, wherein the conditioner composition comprises from about 0.2 wt % to about 1.5 wt % preservation system, preferably from about 0.4 wt % to about 1 wt % preservation system, more preferably from 0.5 wt % to about 0.8 wt % preservation system, and even more preferably from about 0.6 wt % to about 0.8 wt % preservation system.
    • C. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-B, wherein the preservation system comprises less than 2% sodium benzoate, preferably less than 1.5% sodium benzoate, more preferably less than 1% sodium benzoate, even more preferably less than 0.8% sodium benzoate, even more preferably less than 0.6 wt % sodium benzoate, and even more preferably less than 0.5% sodium benzoate.
    • D. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-C, wherein the preservation system comprises from about 0.1 wt % to about 0.5 wt % sodium benzoate, and preferably from about 0.2 wt % to about 0.4 wt % sodium benzoate.
    • E. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-D, wherein the preservation system comprises from about 20% to about 50% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system, preferably from about 25% to about 50% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system, more preferably about 30% to about 50% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system, and even more preferably from about 30% to about 40% sodium benzoate, by weight of the preservation system.
    • F. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-E, wherein the preservation system comprises from about 0.3 wt % to about 1.5 wt % of a second composition, preferably from about 0.32 wt % to about 1 wt % of a second composition, more preferably from about 0.33 wt % to about 0.8 wt % of a second composition, even more preferably from about 0.34 wt % to about 0.6 wt % of a second composition, even more preferably from about 0.35 wt % to about 0.5 wt % of a second composition, even more preferably from about 0.37 wt % to about 0.45 wt % of a second composition, and even more preferably from about 0.38 wt % to about 0.43 wt % of a second composition.
    • G. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-F, wherein the preservation system comprises from about 50% to about 80% of the second composition, by weight of the preservation system, preferably from about 50% to about 75% of the second composition, by weight of the preservation system, more preferably from about 50% to about 70% of the second composition, by weight of the preservation system, and even more preferably from about 50% to about 67%, by weight of the preservation system.
    • H. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-G, wherein the second composition comprises glycol selected from the group consisting of glycols can include butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, decylene glycol, and mixtures thereof.
    • I. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-H, wherein the glycol comprises caprylyl glycol.
    • J. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-I, wherein the second composition comprises glyceryl ester selected from the group consisting of glyceryl caprylate, glyceryl caprate, glyceryl undecylenate and mixtures thereof.
    • K. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-J, wherein the preservation system comprises a weight ratio of sodium benzoate to the second composition from about 1:4 to about 1:1, preferably from about 1:3 to about 1:1, more preferably from about 1:2 to about 1:1, and even more preferably from about 1:1.7 to about 1:1.
    • L. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-K, wherein the composition comprises from about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % cationic surfactant, preferably from about 0.5 wt % to about 8.0 wt % cationic surfactant, and more preferably from about 0.8 wt % to about 6.0 wt % cationic surfactant.
    • M. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-L, wherein the cationic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of behenamidopropyl dimethylamine (BAPDMA), behentrimonium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, and combinations thereof.
    • N. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-M, wherein the cationic surfactant comprises behenamidopropyl dimethylamine (BAPDMA).
    • O. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraph N, comprising from about 2 wt % to about 6.7 wt % BAPDMA, preferably from about 2.2 wt % to about 6.5 wt % BAPDMA, more preferably from about 2.5 wt % to about 6.25 wt % BAPDMA, even more preferably from about 2.75 wt % to about 6 wt % BAPDMA.
    • P. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-0, wherein the composition comprises from about 1 wt % to about 30 wt % high melting point fatty compound, preferably from about 1.5 wt % to about 15 wt % high melting point fatty compound, more preferably from about 2 wt % to about 8 wt %, and even more preferably from about 2.5 wt % to about 7 wt % high melting point fatty compound.
    • Q. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-P, where the high melting point fatty compound comprises a melting point of 25° C. or higher, preferably 40° C. or higher, more preferably 45° C. or higher, and even more preferably 49° C. or higher.
    • R. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-Q, wherein the high melting point fatty compound is selected from the group consisting of cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, behenyl alcohol, brassica alcohol, and combinations thereof.
    • S. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraph R, comprising less than 8 wt % high melting point fatty compound, preferably less than 7.5 wt % high melting point fatty compound, more preferably less than 7 wt % high melting point fatty compound.
    • T. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraph R, comprising from about 2.5 wt % to about 9 wt % high melting point fatty compound, preferably from about 3 wt % to about 8 wt % high melting point fatty compound, more preferably from about 3.25 wt % to about 7.5 wt % high melting point fatty compound, even more preferably from about 3.5 wt % to about 7 wt % high melting point fatty compound, and even more preferably from about 4 wt % to about 6.7 wt % high melting point fatty compound.
    • U. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-T, wherein the conditioner composition comprises from about 40 wt % to about 99 wt % aqueous carrier, preferably from about 50 wt % to about 95 wt % aqueous carrier, more preferably from about 70 wt % to about 93 wt % aqueous carrier, and even more preferably from about 80 wt % to about 92 wt % aqueous carrier.
    • V. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-U, wherein the aqueous carrier comprises water.
    • W. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-V, wherein the level of microbes is undetectable at two days, as measured according to the Bacterial and Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Test Methods, described herein.
    • X. The conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-W, wherein the conditioner composition comprises a shear stress from about 50 Pa to about 500 Pa, preferably from about 75 Pa to about 450 Pa, more preferably from about 100 Pa to about 400 Pa, even more preferably from about 125 Pa to about 375 Pa, and even more preferably from about 135 Pa to about 325 Pa, as measured according to the Shear Stress Test Method, described herein.
    • Y. The conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-X, comprising a pH from about 2.5 to about 5, preferably from about 3.5 to about 4.5, as measured according to the pH Test Method, described herein.
    • Z. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-Y, wherein the composition is substantially free of, preferably free of a preservative ingredient selected from the group consisting of isothiazolinones including 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (commercially available as Kathon™ CG from Dow®), benzyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, cyclohexylglycerin, parabens, and combinations thereof.
    • AA. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-Z, wherein the composition is substantially free, preferably free of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and salts thereof.
    • BB. The hair conditioner composition of Paragraphs A-AA, wherein the composition is substantially free of, preferably free of an ingredient selected from the group consisting of silicone, propellants, phthalates, dyes, sulfates, formaldehyde donors, and combinations thereof.


The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”


Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any patent application or patent to which this application claims priority or benefit thereof, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.


While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.

Claims
  • 1. A hair conditioner composition comprising: a) about 50% to about 95% of an aqueous carrier, by weight of the composition;b) about 0.1% to about 10% of a cationic surfactant, by weight of the composition;c) about 1.5% to about 15% of a high melting point fatty compound, by weight of the composition;d) a preservation system comprising: i) 0.2% to 0.4% sodium benzoate, by weight of the composition;ii) about 0.4% by weight of the composition, of a second composition selected from the group consisting of glycol, glyceryl ester, and combinations thereof; wherein the weight ratio of sodium benzoate to the second composition is about 1:2 to about 1:1; ande) a gel network,
  • 2. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the second composition comprises a glycol selected from the group consisting of butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, decylene glycol, and mixtures thereof.
  • 3. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the glycol comprises caprylyl glycol.
  • 4. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the second composition comprises a glyceryl ester selected from the group consisting of glyceryl capiyiate, glyceryl caprate, glyceryl undecylenate and mixtures thereof.
  • 5. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the cationic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of behenamidopropyl dimethylamine, behentrimonium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, and combinations thereof.
  • 6. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the high melting point fatty compound is a fatty alcohol selected from the group consisting of cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, behenyl alcohol, brassica alcohol, and combinations thereof.
  • 7. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the conditioner composition has a shear stress off about 50 Pa to about 500 Pa, as measured according to Shear Stress Test Method.
  • 8. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the preservation system is substantially free of a preservative ingredient selected from the group consisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and salts thereof, isothiazolinones, benzyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, cyclohexylglycerin, parabens, and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The hair conditioner composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is substantially free of an ingredient selected from the group consisting of silicone, propellants, phthalates, dyes, sulfates, formaldehyde donors, and combinations thereof.
  • 10. A hair conditioner composition that is a solid crystalline gel network comprising: a) about 50% to about 95% of an aqueous carrier, by weight of the composition;b) about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt %, by weight of the composition, of a single cationic surfactant selected from the group consisting of behenamidopropyl dimethylamine, behentrimonium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, and combinations thereof, wherein the composition is free of other surfactants;c) about 1.5 wt % to about 15 wt % of a fatty alcohol selected from the group consisting of cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, behenyl alcohol, and brassica alcohol;d) a preservation system comprising: i) about 0.2% to 0.4% sodium benzoate, by weight of the composition;ii) about 0.4% a glycol selected from the group consisting of butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, decylene glycol, and mixtures thereof; wherein the weight ratio of sodium benzoate to the glycol is about 1:2 to 1:1; ande) a gel network,wherein the composition has an undetectable microbe level at two days, according to the Bacterial and Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Test.
  • 11. The hair care composition of claim 10, wherein the glycol comprises caprylyl glycol.
  • 12. The hair care composition of claim 10, wherein the surfactant comprises behenamidopropyl dimethylamine.
  • 13. The hair conditioner composition of claim 10, wherein microbes are undetectable at two days, as measured according to Bacterial and Fungal Microbial Susceptibility Test Methods.
US Referenced Citations (350)
Number Name Date Kind
2356168 Mabley Aug 1944 A
2396278 Otto Mar 1946 A
2438091 Lynch Mar 1948 A
2486921 Byerly Nov 1949 A
2486922 Bruce Nov 1949 A
2528378 Mannheimer Oct 1950 A
2613185 Marshall Oct 1952 A
2658072 Milton Nov 1953 A
2694668 Fricke Nov 1954 A
2809971 Jack et al. Oct 1957 A
3152046 Maria Oct 1964 A
3236733 Karsten et al. Feb 1966 A
3321425 Karl-ludwig et al. May 1967 A
3332880 Adriaan et al. Jul 1967 A
3426440 Shen et al. Feb 1969 A
3463308 Deneke Aug 1969 A
3489688 Pospischil Jan 1970 A
3653383 Wise Apr 1972 A
3695989 Albert Oct 1972 A
3753196 Kurtz et al. Aug 1973 A
3761418 Parran Sep 1973 A
3929678 Laughlin Dec 1975 A
3967921 Haberli et al. Jul 1976 A
4020156 Murray et al. Apr 1977 A
4051081 Jabs et al. Sep 1977 A
4089945 Brinkman et al. May 1978 A
4149551 Benjamin et al. Apr 1979 A
4196190 Gehman et al. Apr 1980 A
4197865 Jacquet et al. Apr 1980 A
4206196 Davis Jun 1980 A
4217914 Jacquet et al. Aug 1980 A
4272511 Papantoniou et al. Jun 1981 A
4323683 Bolich, Jr. et al. Apr 1982 A
4345080 Bolich, Jr. Aug 1982 A
D266829 Yoshizawa et al. Nov 1982 S
4379753 Bolich, Jr. Apr 1983 A
4381919 Jacquet et al. May 1983 A
4422853 Jacquet et al. Dec 1983 A
4470982 Winkler Sep 1984 A
4507280 Pohl et al. Mar 1985 A
4529586 De Marco et al. Jul 1985 A
4536361 Torobin Aug 1985 A
4565647 Llenado Jan 1986 A
D286450 Tovey Oct 1986 S
4663158 Wolfram et al. May 1987 A
4710374 Grollier et al. Dec 1987 A
4822613 Rodero Apr 1989 A
4885107 Wetzel Dec 1989 A
4976953 Orr et al. Dec 1990 A
4990280 Thorengaard Feb 1991 A
5055384 Kuehnert Oct 1991 A
5061481 Suzuki et al. Oct 1991 A
5062889 Hoehl et al. Nov 1991 A
5062994 Imperatori Nov 1991 A
5094853 Hagarty Mar 1992 A
5098636 Balk Mar 1992 A
5100657 Ansher-jackson et al. Mar 1992 A
5100658 Bolich, Jr. et al. Mar 1992 A
5104646 Bolich, Jr. Apr 1992 A
5106609 Bolich, Jr. Apr 1992 A
5166276 Hayama et al. Nov 1992 A
D334420 Copeland et al. Mar 1993 S
5220033 Kamei et al. Jun 1993 A
5261426 Kellett et al. Nov 1993 A
5280079 Allen et al. Jan 1994 A
RE34584 Grote et al. Apr 1994 E
5391368 Gerstein Feb 1995 A
D357115 Ashley et al. Apr 1995 S
5409703 Mcanalley et al. Apr 1995 A
D358025 Martin et al. May 1995 S
5415810 Lee May 1995 A
5429628 Trinh et al. Jul 1995 A
5455114 Ohmory Oct 1995 A
5457895 Thompson et al. Oct 1995 A
5476597 Sakata et al. Dec 1995 A
5501238 Borstel et al. Mar 1996 A
5580481 Sakata et al. Dec 1996 A
5582786 Brunskill et al. Dec 1996 A
D378180 Hayes Feb 1997 S
5660845 Trinh et al. Aug 1997 A
5672576 Behrens et al. Sep 1997 A
5673576 Chen et al. Oct 1997 A
5674478 Dodd Oct 1997 A
5750122 Evans May 1998 A
5780047 Kamiya et al. Jul 1998 A
D398847 Wyslotsky Sep 1998 S
5885561 Flemming et al. Mar 1999 A
D407640 Crapser et al. Apr 1999 S
D408223 Henry Apr 1999 S
5911224 Berger Jun 1999 A
5925603 D'Angelo Jul 1999 A
5955419 Barket, Jr. et al. Sep 1999 A
5976454 Sterzel et al. Nov 1999 A
D418415 Hayes Jan 2000 S
D418750 Blin Jan 2000 S
6010719 Remon et al. Jan 2000 A
6029808 Peck et al. Feb 2000 A
6034043 Fujiwara Mar 2000 A
D427902 Hayes Jul 2000 S
6106849 Malkan et al. Aug 2000 A
6177391 Zafar Jan 2001 B1
6200949 Reijmer et al. Mar 2001 B1
D442739 Friesenhahn May 2001 S
D443389 Friesenhahn Jun 2001 S
D449881 Mock, Sr. Oct 2001 S
D450378 Minakuchi et al. Nov 2001 S
6365142 Tamura Apr 2002 B1
D462900 Yamada et al. Sep 2002 S
6458754 Velazquez et al. Oct 2002 B1
D465303 Friesenhahn Nov 2002 S
6503521 Atis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6525034 Dalrymple et al. Feb 2003 B2
D484749 Garraway Jan 2004 S
6790814 Marin Sep 2004 B1
6800295 Fox Oct 2004 B2
6808375 Kloetzer Oct 2004 B2
6825161 Shefer et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831046 Carew et al. Dec 2004 B2
6846784 Engel et al. Jan 2005 B2
6878368 Ohta et al. Apr 2005 B2
6943200 Corrand et al. Sep 2005 B1
D515915 Karim Feb 2006 S
7015181 Lambino Mar 2006 B2
7208460 Shefer et al. Apr 2007 B2
D549051 Nordwall Aug 2007 S
7285520 Krzysik Oct 2007 B2
7387787 Fox Jun 2008 B2
D578881 Friedland Oct 2008 S
D588332 Phelan Mar 2009 S
7832552 Newman Nov 2010 B2
7846462 Spadini et al. Dec 2010 B2
7892992 Kamada et al. Feb 2011 B2
7901696 Eknoian et al. Mar 2011 B2
D640921 Caldwell Jul 2011 S
D651096 Nakagiri Dec 2011 S
D655154 Amos Mar 2012 S
8197830 Helfman et al. Jun 2012 B2
8268764 Glenn, Jr. et al. Sep 2012 B2
8273333 Glenn, Jr. Sep 2012 B2
8288332 Fossum et al. Oct 2012 B2
8309505 Fossum et al. Nov 2012 B2
8349341 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 B2
8349786 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 B2
8349787 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357728 Butler et al. Jan 2013 B2
D680882 Logue Apr 2013 S
8415287 Glenn, Jr. et al. Apr 2013 B2
D682622 Keys May 2013 S
8461090 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jun 2013 B2
8461091 Glenn, Jr. Jun 2013 B2
8466099 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jun 2013 B2
D685436 Menting Jul 2013 S
8476211 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jul 2013 B2
8546640 Popovsky et al. Oct 2013 B2
D694621 Mccarthy Dec 2013 S
8723333 Park et al. May 2014 B2
8765170 Glenn, Jr. Jul 2014 B2
D739227 Mitchell et al. Sep 2015 S
D740928 Bruining et al. Oct 2015 S
9198838 Glenn, Jr. Dec 2015 B2
D769522 Venet Oct 2016 S
9539444 Kinoshita et al. Jan 2017 B2
D793025 Slusarczyk et al. Aug 2017 S
D797551 Chatterton Sep 2017 S
D798143 Chatterton Sep 2017 S
D808583 Zietek Jan 2018 S
10226404 Takahashi et al. Mar 2019 B2
10278915 Kawa May 2019 B1
10294586 Sivik et al. May 2019 B2
D851344 Carlson et al. Jun 2019 S
D857156 Hani Aug 2019 S
10391046 Hartnett et al. Aug 2019 B2
10413496 Pistorio et al. Sep 2019 B2
D862020 Gorrell et al. Oct 2019 S
10449131 Li et al. Oct 2019 B2
D866893 Hunt et al. Nov 2019 S
D867717 Chavez Nov 2019 S
D868953 Mckendree Dec 2019 S
10569286 Anderson et al. Feb 2020 B2
10694917 Dreher et al. Jun 2020 B2
D910434 Tan et al. Feb 2021 S
D910457 Lee Feb 2021 S
20020077264 Roberts et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020081930 Jackson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020098994 Zafar Jul 2002 A1
20020099109 Dufton et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020177621 Hanada et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020187181 Godbey et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030018242 Hursh et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032573 Tanner et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045441 Hsu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069154 Hsu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030080150 Cowan May 2003 A1
20030082129 Buckingham et al. May 2003 A1
20030099691 Lydzinski et al. May 2003 A1
20030099692 Lydzinski et al. May 2003 A1
20030180242 Eccard et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030186826 Eccard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194416 Shefer Oct 2003 A1
20030199412 Gupta Oct 2003 A1
20030209166 Vanmaele et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030215522 Johnson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030232183 Dufton Dec 2003 A1
20040029762 Hensley Feb 2004 A1
20040032859 Miao Feb 2004 A1
20040048759 Ribble et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040048771 Mcdermott Mar 2004 A1
20040053808 Raehse et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059055 Inada Mar 2004 A1
20040071742 Popplewell Apr 2004 A1
20040071755 Fox Apr 2004 A1
20040108615 Foley Jun 2004 A1
20040110656 Casey et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040115155 Salvador et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126585 Kerins et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040175404 Shefer Sep 2004 A1
20040180597 Kamada Sep 2004 A1
20040202632 Gott et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040206270 Vanmaele et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040242097 Hasenoehrl Dec 2004 A1
20040242772 Huth et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050069575 Fox Mar 2005 A1
20050136780 Clark et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137272 Gaserod Jun 2005 A1
20050159730 Kathrani et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050202992 Grandio et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050220745 Lu Oct 2005 A1
20050232954 Yoshinari et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050272836 Yaginuma et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287106 Legendre Dec 2005 A1
20060002880 Peffly et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013869 Ignatious Jan 2006 A1
20060024256 Wells et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052263 Roreger et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064510 Low et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078528 Yang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078529 Uchida et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060128592 Ross Jun 2006 A1
20060159730 Simon Jul 2006 A1
20060228319 Vona, Jr. et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060269501 Johnson Nov 2006 A1
20060274263 Yacktman et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070028939 Mareri et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070031369 Verboom et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070099813 Luizzi May 2007 A1
20070110792 Simon May 2007 A9
20070135528 Butler et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149435 Koenig et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070190005 Rozsa Aug 2007 A1
20070225388 Cooper et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070237736 Burgo et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080035174 Aubrun-sonneville Feb 2008 A1
20080083420 Glenn et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080090939 Netravali et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080131695 Aquad et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080138492 Cingotti Jun 2008 A1
20080139672 Rozsa et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152894 Beihoffer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080153730 Tsaur Jun 2008 A1
20080187507 Johnson Aug 2008 A1
20080215023 Scavone et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080292669 Deng et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080293839 Stobby Nov 2008 A1
20090197787 Venet et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090232873 Glenn, Jr. et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090263342 Glenn, Jr. Oct 2009 A1
20100018641 Branham Jan 2010 A1
20100150858 Runglertkriangkrai Jun 2010 A1
20100150976 Schnitzler Jun 2010 A1
20100167971 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100173817 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100286011 Glenn, Jr. et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291165 Glenn, Jr. et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110023240 Fossum Feb 2011 A1
20110027328 Baig et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110028374 Fossum et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110033509 Simon Feb 2011 A1
20110165110 Kinoshita et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110182956 Glenn, Jr. et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110189247 Glenn, Jr. Aug 2011 A1
20110195098 Glenn, Jr. Aug 2011 A1
20110250256 Hyun-oh et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110287687 Kramer et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120021026 Glenn, Jr. Jan 2012 A1
20120052036 Glenn, Jr. Mar 2012 A1
20120052037 Sivik et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120107534 Wnuk et al. May 2012 A1
20120237576 Gordon Sep 2012 A1
20120270029 Glenn, Jr. et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120294823 Aramwit Nov 2012 A1
20120321580 Glenn, Jr. Dec 2012 A1
20130236520 Popovsky et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130280193 Carter et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130303419 Glenn, Jr. et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140105942 Pistorio et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140329428 Glenn, Jr. Nov 2014 A1
20140356307 Yang Dec 2014 A1
20150017218 Pettigrew et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150250701 Hamersky et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150290109 Simonnet et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150297494 Mao Oct 2015 A1
20150313803 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313804 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313805 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313806 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313807 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313808 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313809 Lynch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150313823 Lockett et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150315350 Mao et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160089314 Marsh Mar 2016 A1
20160101026 Pratt Apr 2016 A1
20160101204 Lynch Apr 2016 A1
20160143825 Pesaro et al. May 2016 A1
20160143827 Castan Barberan et al. May 2016 A1
20160158134 Disalvo Jun 2016 A1
20160206533 Callens Jul 2016 A1
20160243007 Constantine et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160250109 Dreher et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160361242 Durtschi et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160367104 Dreher et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170056300 Constantine et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170056301 Constantine et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170105917 Iwata Apr 2017 A1
20170121641 Smith May 2017 A1
20170202760 Callens Jul 2017 A1
20170335080 Mao et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180028435 Punsch et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180071193 Fields Mar 2018 A1
20180311135 Chang et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180311137 McKiernan Nov 2018 A1
20180333339 Hamersky Nov 2018 A1
20180333494 Lane et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180334644 Hamersky et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180360702 Demarcq et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190282457 Pratt Sep 2019 A1
20190282461 Glassmeyer Sep 2019 A1
20190350819 Hamersky et al. Nov 2019 A1
20200093710 Hamersky Mar 2020 A1
20200108003 Iwata et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200197272 Hertenstein et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200214946 Chan et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200308360 Mao et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200405587 Song Dec 2020 A1
20210000733 Hilvert Jan 2021 A1
20210094744 Benson et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210107263 Bartolucci et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210147763 Tan et al. May 2021 A1
20210161784 Zhao et al. Jun 2021 A1
20220168200 Zhao et al. Jun 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (93)
Number Date Country
1138091 Dec 1996 CN
1219388 Jun 1999 CN
1268558 Oct 2000 CN
1357613 Jul 2002 CN
1530431 Sep 2004 CN
1583991 Feb 2005 CN
106726634 May 2017 CN
106728634 May 2017 CN
109589279 Mar 2020 CN
19607851 Sep 1997 DE
10331767 Feb 2005 DE
102010002863 Sep 2011 DE
102010026747 Jan 2012 DE
DM100932 Apr 2018 DE
DM100938 Apr 2018 DE
DM101063 May 2018 DE
DM101100 May 2018 DE
DM101101 May 2018 DE
609808 Aug 1994 EP
0858828 Aug 1998 EP
1206933 May 2002 EP
1217987 Dec 2004 EP
1160311 Mar 2006 EP
1808157 Jul 2007 EP
1958532 Aug 2008 EP
2085434 Aug 2009 EP
1317916 Oct 2010 EP
2606725 Jun 2013 EP
2871685 Dec 2005 FR
2886845 Dec 2006 FR
2992217 Dec 2013 FR
2235204 Feb 1991 GB
2355008 Apr 2001 GB
58021608 Feb 1983 JP
S58216109 Dec 1983 JP
S6272609 Apr 1987 JP
S6272610 Apr 1987 JP
S6281432 Apr 1987 JP
H01172319 Jul 1989 JP
H01313418 Dec 1989 JP
H0275650 Mar 1990 JP
H05344873 Dec 1993 JP
H0617083 Jan 1994 JP
0753349 Feb 1995 JP
H0789852 Apr 1995 JP
H08325133 Dec 1996 JP
H09216909 Aug 1997 JP
H10251371 Sep 1998 JP
H11322591 Nov 1999 JP
2000053998 Feb 2000 JP
2003073700 Mar 2003 JP
2003082397 Mar 2003 JP
2003113032 Apr 2003 JP
2004256799 Sep 2004 JP
2004345983 Dec 2004 JP
2005171063 Jun 2005 JP
2006097010 Apr 2006 JP
2007091954 Apr 2007 JP
2007197540 Aug 2007 JP
20020003442 Jan 2002 KR
20150049027 May 2015 KR
8301943 Jun 1983 WO
9514495 Jun 1995 WO
0112134 Feb 2001 WO
0119948 Mar 2001 WO
0125393 Apr 2001 WO
200125322 Apr 2001 WO
2001024770 Apr 2001 WO
2001054667 Aug 2001 WO
2004032859 Apr 2004 WO
2004041991 May 2004 WO
2005003423 Jan 2005 WO
2005070374 Aug 2005 WO
2005075547 Aug 2005 WO
2007033598 Mar 2007 WO
2007093558 Aug 2007 WO
2009016555 Feb 2009 WO
2009019571 Feb 2009 WO
2009095891 Aug 2009 WO
2010077627 Jul 2010 WO
2010085569 Jul 2010 WO
2011113501 Sep 2011 WO
2012120199 Sep 2012 WO
2012172207 Dec 2012 WO
2013150044 Oct 2013 WO
2014124070 Aug 2014 WO
2015053281 Apr 2015 WO
2018023180 Feb 2018 WO
2018098542 Jun 2018 WO
2019001940 Jan 2019 WO
2019014868 Jan 2019 WO
2019090098 May 2019 WO
2019142194 Jul 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (24)
Entry
VegeCide. https://web.archive.org/web/20120824144807/http://www.ingredientstodiefor.com/item/VegeCide/925/. Published: Aug. 24, 2012.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/062656 dated Mar. 12, 2021.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 16/953,975.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 17/108,081.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 17/209,292.
Anonymous “P8136 Poly(vinyl alcohol)” Internet article, [Online] XP002538935 retrieved from the Internet: URL:hllp/20NWW.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?D7=0%N25-SEARCH_ CONCAT PNOIDBRAND KEY%N4=P8136%7SCIAL%N25=0%QS=ON%F=SPEC retrieved on Jul. 28, 2009.
Briscoe et al. “The effects of hydrogen bonding upon the viscosity of aqueous poly( vinyl alcohol) solutions,” from Polymer, 41 (2000), pp. 3851-3860.
Guerrini et al. “Thermal and Structural Characterization of Nanofibers of Poly( vinyl alcohol) Produced by Electrospinning”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 112, Feb. 9, 2009, pp. 1680-1687.
Hildebrand, T., et al. “Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure mode index”, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 1, Jan. 14, 1997, pp. 15-23.
How Gemz work?, Gemz Hair Care, published on Oct. 1, 2018, retrieved on Apr. 27, 2021, retrieved from the Internet URL: https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts1waYk43g4.
https ://www.craftcuts.com/hexagon-craft-shape. htmlHexagon wood cutouts, www.craftcuts.com, 1 page, reviewed as early as May 2018 (Year: 2018).
Okasaka et al., “Evaluation Of Anionic Surfactants Effects On The Skin Barrier Function Based On Skin Permeability”, Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 23, 2018, pp. 99-104.
Product Review: Gemz Solid Shampoo, Travel As Much, published on Mar. 19, 2019, retrieved on Apr. 27, 2021, retrieved from the Internet URL: https://travelasmuch.com/gemz-solid-shampoo-review/.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 17/209,292, filed Mar. 23, 2021, to Jennifer Mary Marsh et. al.
Vaughan, C.D. “Solubility, Effects in Product, Package, Penetration and Preservation”, Cosmetics and Toiletries, vol. 103, Oct. 1988.
Veslerby, A.: “Star Volume in Bone Research: A Histomorphometric Analysis Of Trabecular Bone Structure UsingVertical Sections”, Anal Rec: Feb. 1993, 232(2), pp. 325-334.
Zhang et al. “Study on Morphology of Electrospun Poly( vinyl alcohol) Mats,” European Polymer Journal 41 (2005), pp. 423-432.
All Office Actions; U.S. Appl. No. 17/398,024, filed Aug. 10, 2021.
All Office Actions; U.S. Appl. No. 17/398,025, filed Aug. 10, 2021.
All Office Actions; U.S. Appl. No. 17/398,020, filed Aug. 10, 2021.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 17/398,020, filed Aug. 10, 2021, to Jean Jianqun Zhao et. al.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 17/398,024, filed Aug. 10, 2021, to Jean Jianqun Zhao et. al.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 17/398,025, filed Aug. 10, 2021, to Jean Jianqun Zhao et. al.
All Office Actions; U.S. Appl. No. 17/537,549, filed Nov. 30, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210161780 A1 Jun 2021 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62942209 Dec 2019 US
62942208 Dec 2019 US