The half-duplex communication system shown in
The first transceiver 1 comprises a first transmitter 3 and a first receiver 4 connected via a radio frequency (RF) matching arrangement 5 to an electronic switching arrangement 6. The switching arrangement 6 is arranged to select from among a plurality of antennae so as to perform antenna diversity. In the embodiment illustrated in
The transceiver 1 further comprises a controller 9 which controls the operation of the transmitter 3, the receiver 4, and the switching arrangement 6. The controller 9 enables the transmitter 3 and the receiver 4 to perform interlaced or alternating transmission and reception periods and causes the switching arrangement 6 to change the antenna selection in accordance with the desired mode of operation.
The second transceiver 2 comprises a second transmitter 10 and a second receiver 11 connected via an RF matching arrangement 12 to a common antenna arrangement. One or more antennae may be provided and the transceiver 2 shown in
When the system shown in
The half-duplex communication system performs automatic handshaking with antenna diversity. Each of the controllers 9 and 15 controls the associated receiver and transmitter to perform a series of communication cycles such that each of the communication cycles comprises at least one reception period followed by at least one transmission period. For example each such communication cycle may comprise a single reception period followed by a single transmission period.
During a reception period of the receiver 4 controlled by the controller 9, the transceiver 1 expects to receive a message from the transceiver 2, for example comprising one or more packets of data. If the receiver 4 receives a complete and uncorrupted message from the transceiver 2, the controller 9 causes the transmitter 3 to send a return message which may or may not provide acknowledge of correct reception and which may include one or more data packets for the transceiver 2.
The controller 15 synchronises the transceiver 2 such that each reception period of the receiver 11 contains a corresponding transmission period of the transmitter 3. if the receiver 11 receives a complete and uncorrupted message from the transceiver 1, the controller 15 causes the transmitter 10 to transmit a reply during the next transmission period. Again, the reply may contain an acknowledgement of correct receipt of the message from the transceiver 1 and may comprise one or more data packets for transmission to the receiver 4.
If either of the receivers 5 and 11 receives, during any of its reception periods, an incomplete or corrupted message or fails to receive any message during the expected reception period, the receiver signals the corresponding controller 9 or 15 that an “unacceptable reception event” has occurred. The controller then causes the corresponding transmitter to send a message to the other transceiver signalling unacceptable reception and typically containing a request for retransmission of the message whose reception was unacceptable. The controller may cause the transmitter to request a complete retransmission of the previous message from the other transceiver or may request only partial retransmission of any part of the message which was not acceptably or correctly received. When the remote receiver receives such a message, it retransmits part or all of the message which it previously transmitted and which was not correctly received.
In order to provide antenna diversity, the transceiver 1 may operate in either or both of two modes of operation. According to the first mode of operation, the controller 9 automatically causes the switching arrangement 6 to change the selected antenna after the completion of each communication cycle by the receiver 4 and the transmitter 3. In particular, changing of the selected antenna occurs entirely automatically as a result of completion of each communication cycle by the transceiver 1. The switching arrangement 6 cycles through the available antennae in a repeating cycle.
When both of the antennae 7 and 8 provide adequate communication with the transceiver 2, the receivers 4 and 11 correctly receive the messages transmitted by the transmitters 10 and 3, respectively, so that the messages are transmitted without the need for repetition. The dataflow between the transceivers 1 and 2 thus proceeds at the maximum rate and switching between the antennae 7 and 8 has no effect.
During operation of the communication system, the propagation conditions between the transceivers 1 and 2 may deteriorate. For example, received signal strength may decrease because of increasing separation between the transceivers or because of other causes, such as relative changes in orientation. As the received signal strength reduces, a point is reached where the signal strength for one of the antennae 7 and 8 becomes inadequate for correct transmission or reception. When the “inadequate” antenna is selected, the receiver 4 or 11 signals to the corresponding controller 9 or 15 an unacceptable reception event. As mentioned hereinbefore, this may result from failure to receive a message within the allotted reception period, from reception of only part of a message, or from corruption of a message such that it is not correctly decipherable. For example, when the receiver 4 suffers such an unacceptable reception event, or receives a request for retransmission from the transmitter 10, it signals the controller 9 which, in turn, causes the transmitter 3 to transmit the message, or part of the message, which was transmitted in the preceding transmission period of the transceiver 1. However, at the end of the previous communication cycle of the transceiver 1, the controller 9 caused the switching arrangement 6 to select a different antenna. Accordingly, the current communication cycle is performed via the “adequate” antenna.
In the case of a two antenna diversity arrangement as illustrated in the example of
If reception conditions deteriorate further, there comes a point where the signal strength is inadequate for communication by any antenna and communication then ceases. The ultimate range is substantially the same as that for the antenna providing the higher signal strength.
In the second mode of operation, changing the selection of the antennae 7, 8 by the switching arrangement 6 is controlled by the controller 9 only when an unacceptable reception event, as described hereinbefore, happens. Thus, at the start of a communication session, the controller 9 controls the switching arrangement 6 to select arbitrarily one of the antennae 7 and 8. The selected antenna is then used for communication with the transceiver 2 unless and until the receiver 4 signals to the controller 9 that an unacceptable reception event has happened. The controller 9 then causes the switching arrangement 6 to select a different one of the antennae, in the present example the other of the antennae 7 and 8, for further communication between the transceivers. The newly selected antenna is then used for further communication unless and until another unacceptable reception event happens, in which case the antenna selection is changed.
Depending on the reception conditions, this mode of operation may allow faster data rates to be obtained from the communication system. For example, where the propagation conditions for the antennae are changing slowly, the data rate may be equal to or close to the maximum possible rate. The maximum range of operation is the same as for the first mode and the same for more complex antenna diversity systems of known type. However, in both modes of operation, antenna switching is employed so that the transceivers may be relatively simple and less expensive than known arrangements. Although data rates may not be as high as for the more sophisticated systems of known type, the maximum range may be the same and acceptable performance throughout the range may be achieved for many applications.
The system may be arranged to operate in both of the above-described modes simultaneously. For example, each communication cycle may comprise a plurality of transmission periods alternating with a plurality of reception periods with the antenna selection being changed at the end of each communication cycle. However, if an unacceptable reception event occurs during a communication cycle, the controller 9 may then change the antenna selection before the end of the communication cycle. At the end of that communication cycle, the antenna selection may be changed automatically or may remain the same for the next communication cycle.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0615261.5 | Aug 2006 | GB | national |
0615902.4 | Aug 2006 | GB | national |