The present disclosure relates to chairs, stools, sitting devices, standing devices, leaning devices and body-support devices. In particular, the present disclosure relates to a piece of furniture that serves as a substitute to office chairs, task chairs, stools, leaning chairs, perching chairs, and hybrids of such.
Well-designed sitting devices that account for ergonomic factors should promote good posture to minimize strain in the neck and back and should allow for periodic adjustments in the user's position to redistribute stresses, relieve pressure points, and allow blood flow through areas where blood flow has been constricted.
Good posture can be generally defined as posture in which the spine maintains neutral curvature, with normal lordotic (“inward”) curvature of the cervical and lumbar spine and normal kyphotic (“outward”) curvature of the thoracic spine. Deviation from neutral curvature, as occurs when one is slumping, creates an aesthetically unappealing appearance and causes shear stresses between vertebra. Shear stresses are increased as deviation is increased, or as load is increased. Shear stresses can trigger pain in people sensitive to such stresses, especially in those who have had previous spinal injuries. Lower back pain, for example, is a common cause of missed workdays in the United States.
Maintaining a neutral lumbar spine requires the least effort in the core muscles when a thigh is at an angle close to 180 degrees relative to the back (e.g. when standing). For this reason, posture is often better when a person is standing than when he or she is sitting. However, standing requires muscular effort to keep the leg extended and to balance the body (since bipedal standing is not inherently stable). To reduce the effort required when stationary, numerous devices are used, such as chairs. But chairs put the thighs at an angle less than 180 degrees (often approximately 90 degrees) in relation to the back, causing a flexion force in the lumbar spine, the flexion force increasing with decreasing back-thigh angle. Unwanted flexion can be counteracted by using the core muscles to maintain normal lordosis of the lumbar spine; such use of core muscles is present when one is, for example, “sitting up straight”. However, prolonged exertion of core muscles can cause fatigue, which hinders the person's ability to continue maintaining good posture.
Many devices are available that attempt to improve sitting posture or to reduce time spent sitting.
Lumbar-support devices apply an external force to the lumbar spine to counteract the flexion force caused by sitting.
Reclining chairs increase back-thigh angle by reclining the back while maintaining the thighs in a horizontal position. They are often accompanied by lumbar-support devices.
Saddle chairs, kneeling chairs, and perching stools increase back-thigh angle by positioning the thighs at a downward angle while allowing the upper body and back to remain vertical, reducing the core-muscle effort required to maintain a neutral spine. They are usually not accompanied by lumbar-support devices.
Leaning chairs create a nearly or fully 180-degree back-thigh angle, reducing or virtually eliminating flexion forces in the lumbar spine.
Sit/stand desks allow the user to alternate between sitting and unsupported standing, allowing for periodic relief of the legs and lower back, respectively.
Each of these devices has disadvantages that the present disclosure does not.
Lumbar-support devices often do not apply enough pressure to the lumbar spine to maintain neutral curvature. They are often used ineffectually, such as when the user does not sit far enough back in the seat pan or when inadequate pressure is applied by the device to the lumbar spine.
Lumbar-support devices, saddle chairs, and kneeling chairs place the user in a fixed position and thus are not conducive to repositioning, which is necessary to redistribute stresses and pressure points, or to promote blood flow.
Saddle chairs put significant pressure on the ischial tuberosities (“sit bones”) and the soft tissue near the sit bones, which can cause discomfort over time.
Kneeling chairs put significant pressure on the knees, which can cause discomfort over time.
Perching stools sometimes require stiff cushions to maintain grip between the user's butt and the seat, to prevent the user from sliding down the seat.
Saddle chairs, kneeling chairs, and perching stools require some core exertion to maintain neutral lumbar lordosis, though less exertion than required by a chair that places the thighs at 90 degrees in relation to the back. Kneeling chairs and perching stools also require leg-muscle exertion to prevent the butt from sliding down the seat.
Reclining chairs require flexion of the upper back or neck to maintain a horizontal head when viewing a screen. Reclining chairs also position the user farther from items on a desk, such as a keyboard, requiring him or her to reach when using such items. Reclining chairs also require a headrest to prevent the head from falling backward. Reclining chairs also make it difficult to read or write on a desk, activities that usually warrant an upright or forward lean of the upper body. Lastly, reclining chairs put the sitter in a more rested position, which can cause drowsiness and reduce attentiveness.
Perching stools and leaning chairs direct a high proportion of the body weight through the legs, stressing the musculature and joints in the legs.
Sit/stand desks require raising and lowering the desk platform, a function that can be expensive to implement and interrupts the user's activity every time the desk platform is translated.
Most methods of sitting, perching, and leaning keep the body symmetrical between the right and left halves. In particular, the back-thigh angle of the right leg is the same as that of the left. However, this need not be the case. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,872 describes a sitting device in which one leg is in a standing position (i.e. with a 180-degree femur-spine angle) and the other leg in a sitting position (i.e. with a 90-degree femur-spine angle), or in which both legs are in a sitting position. The device has a separate seat pad for each the left and right side which robotically changes angle such that the user can switch standing legs without repositioning the upper body. A disadvantage of this design is that it is complex and potentially expensive to manufacture.
An improved apparatus for sitting/standing satisfies several needs: It enables a 180-degree back-thigh angle; it does not cause extension or flexion of the cervical spine; it eliminates fatigue caused by continuous balancing; it allows periodic rest of leg extensor muscles and relief of pressure points; it allows for positional adjustment with minimal effort; and it is simple in construction.
The present disclosure promotes good posture by enabling the user to extend a leg downward while in a “half-seated” position, in which the user's posture is similar to that of a person who is standing.
The present disclosure vertically supports one side (“supported side”) of the user's pelvis while the other side (“unsupported side”) is vertically supported by the user's standing leg. Having one but not the other side of the pelvis supported by the seat is possible because there is a cutout in the seat through which the standing leg may extend. The seat underlies the sit bone on the supported side of the pelvis but does not underly the sit bone on the unsupported side of the pelvis. The foot on the supported side is placed on a footrest, while the foot on the unsupported side is placed on a base. The weight of the user is therefore distributed among the seat, the footrest, and the base. When the left sit bone but not the right sit bone is supported by the seat, the user is said to be in a “left-seated” position. When the right sit bone but not the left sit bone is supported by the seat, the user is said to be in a “right-seated” position. Stability of the user is enhanced when the user presses back on the seat with the unsupported side of the pelvis, engaging a built-in anti-rotation mechanism (e.g., a mechanical stop, a friction device, etc.) and preventing pelvic rotation in the transverse plane of the user's body. It can be readily inferred that the leg extensor muscles on the supported side are rested, while those on the unsupported side are engaged.
The user may at any time switch the supported and unsupported sides. To do so, the user need only reorient the seat so that the seat underlies the newly supported side and no longer underlies the previously supported side. Therefore, the present disclosure features a seating apparatus that allows for a simple and minimally disruptive way to switch supported and unsupported sides of the pelvis. Reorientation can be rotation, translation, or a combination of the two.
Besides the “left-seated” and “right-seated” positions, the user has other choices of positions: The user may choose a standing position, in which neither sit bones are supported by the seat; the user may choose a conventionally seated position, in which both sit bones are resting on the seat and both feet are resting on a footrest, the base, or the floor; the user may switch to a seated position in which he or she is straddling a saddle integrated into the seat, with both feet on a base or the floor.
The half-sitting stool 10 of the present disclosure includes a seat portion 100, supported by a stem portion 200, and a base portion 300 upon which stem portion 200 is mounted. The seat portion 100 can rotate relative to the base portion 300 in the transverse plane of the user. An apparatus enabling orientation of seat portion 100 relative to base portion 300 may be located in seat portion 100, stem portion 200, or base portion 300. The distance between seat portion 100 and base portion 300 can be adjusted by a height-adjustment mechanism. Also shown in
Stem portion 200 is attached to base portion 300 so that stem portion 200 remains upright and does not tip over, even when a leaning force is applied to it. The base portion 300 may be an apparatus movable relative to the floor, affixed to the floor, or contained in the floor.
To rotate the seat, the user can manually use his/her hands. Alternatively, the user can lower the leg on the supported side, applying backward pressure on the edge of seat 100, thereby inducing a transverse torque on seat 100 that causes it to rotate, while simultaneously raising the leg on the unsupported side, until the seat underlies the pelvis on the previously unsupported side, which becomes the supported side.
In some embodiments, the half-sitting stool may contain a rotational spring which tends to return seat 100 to a default position (e.g., bias the seat 100 to a default position, etc.), in addition to or in lieu of an anti-rotation mechanism. Multiple default positions are possible (e.g., a center default position, a left default position, a right default position, etc.)
Although the user of
The seat platform can have various shapes (when viewed from the top) to accommodate different sizes of people (e.g., a smaller size for smaller adults/kids, a larger size for larger adults/kids, etc.). The specific profile of the seat platform can also be varied. For example, the empty space can have a larger or smaller angle, the size of the saddle portion can be longer/shorter, or wider/narrower.
The 3-D profile of the seat platform (when viewed from the side) can also vary. In the embodiments shown here, the 3-D profile of the seat platform is flat. The 3-D profile of the seat platform can be varied by using different shapes/contours of the seat base and/or the seat cushion.
Although the changes in orientation of the seat shown in
Upper column 212 can include a height-adjustment lever 211, an outer cylinder 217, and a bushing 216. The lower column 213 can include a gas lift 214 and a guide rail 215. The column length is fixed until the user activates the height-adjustment mechanism by actuating height-adjustment lever 211 which in turn actuates a pushbutton on gas lift 214, permitting gas lift 214 to extend or retract. Bushing 216 serves as a linear bushing between outer cylinder 217 and gas lift 214. Bushing 216 also is used to implement a rotation-limiting function in conjunction with guide rail 215.
Base portion 300 serves as a support for stem portion 200 and footrest portion 400. Base portion 300 (not shown in
Embodiment 310 of base portion 300 (see
Embodiment 320 of base portion 300 includes a structural frame 326 that is offset from the floor by a plurality of wheels. Front wheels 324 are swiveling and rear wheels 323 non-swiveling. The wheels are mounted to structural frame 326. Structural frame 326 includes mount point 321 for stem portion 200 and mount point 322 for footrest portion 400. In the left-seated and right-seated positions, the user's foot on the unsupported side rests on the floor beside structural frame 326. In the standing position, both the user's feet rest on the floor beside structural frame 326. Embodiment 320 also includes a brake 325 that prevents the wheel from spinning when the user applies some weight to half-sitting stool 10 via seat portion 100. The function of brake 325 is to prevent transverse movement of half-sitting stool 10 relative to the floor while the user has some of her weight applied to half-sitting stool 10.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application 62/822,813 filed on 23 Mar. 2019, which is incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62822813 | Mar 2019 | US |