This application claims the benefit of German Application No. 10 2005 034 269.8 filed Jul. 22, 2005.
The present invention relates to flame-retardant polyurethane foams which comprise, as flame retardant, halogen-free tetraalkyl bisphosphates, and also to a process for production of these foams, and to their uses.
Polyurethane foams are plastics used in many sectors, such as furniture, mattresses, transport, construction and technical insulation. In order to meet stringent flame retardancy requirements, for example those demanded for materials in sectors such as the automotive sector, railway sector and aircraft-interior-equipment sector, and also for insulation in buildings, polyurethane foams generally have to be modified with flame retardants. A wide variety of different flame retardants is known for this purpose and is commercially available. However, their use is complicated by a wide variety of considerable application-related problems or toxicological concerns.
For example, when solid flame retardants, e.g. melamine, ammonium polyphosphate and ammonium sulphate are used technical problems of metering arise and often necessitate modifications to the foaming systems, i.e. complicated reconstruction and adaptation measures.
The frequently used flame retardants tris(chloroethyl)phosphate (molar mass 285 g/mol) and tris(chloroisopropyl)phosphate (molar mass 327 g/mol) are liquids that are easy to meter. However, an increasing requirement recently placed on open-cell flexible polyurethane foam systems for automobile-interior equipment is that the gaseous emissions (Volatile Organic Compounds, VOCs), and especially the condensable emissions (fogging) from these foams are not to exceed low threshold values. The abovementioned liquids now fail to meet these requirements because they have relatively low molar masses and consequently excessive volatility.
Fogging is the undesired condensation of vaporized volatile constituents on interior equipment of a motor vehicle on panes of glass, in particular on the windscreen. DIN 75 201 permits quantitative assessment of this phenomenon. A typical requirement of the automobile industry is that fogging condensate is permitted to be less than 1 mg by the DIN 75201 B method.
Tris(2,3-dichloroisopropyl)phosphate is likewise liquid and, with molar mass of 431 g/mol, has volatility sufficiently low to permit achievement of good fogging values. However, halogen-free flame retardant systems are frequently preferred for reasons of environmental toxicology and also for reasons of better side-effects in the event of a fire, in relation to smoke density and smoke toxicity. Halogen-free flame retardants can also be of particular interest for application-related reasons. For example, when halogenated flame retardants are used severe corrosion phenomena are observed on the plant components used for flame lamination of polyurethane foams. This can be attributed to the hydrohalic acid emissions arising during the flame lamination of halogen-containing polyurethane foams.
Flame lamination is the term used for a process for the bonding of textiles and foams by using a flame for incipient melting of one side of a foam sheet and then immediately pressing a textile web onto this side.
The halogen-free liquid flame retardant systems known hitherto, e.g. triethyl phosphate or other alkyl or aryl phosphates, such as diphenyl cresyl phosphate, give only inadequate compliance with the abovementioned requirements for very low levels of VOCs or very low levels of fogging, or exhibit inadequate flame retardancy.
In JP 2004339409 A2 and JP 2004352773 A2, tetraethyl ethylene glycol 1,2-diphosphate is described as flame retardant for polyurethane foams. Its very low molar mass of 334 g/mol makes it too volatile to permit a very low level of fogging.
Obvious methods of achieving low fogging values use hydroxy-bearing, reactive phosphates (DE-A 43 42 972) or phosphonates (DE-C 199 27 548). These react with the polyisocyanate used for foam production and are thus incorporated into the polyurethane. They therefore give very low fogging values. However, their processing is difficult because they disrupt the isocyanate reactions during the foaming process. The foam quality of a polyurethane foam depends on matching of the catalyst system to the competing reactions of the polyisocyanates with the polyols and, if appropriate, with the water. If then another reactive component is introduced, with a hydroxy-bearing flame retardant, the result can be production defects, such as shrinkage or cracks. The catalyst system, which is often composed of two or more components, then has to be matched to the reactivity of the flame retardant, while taking into account the stabilizers used, blowing agents, cell regulators, and, if appropriate, other constituents. This matching necessitates time-consuming development work. Furthermore, an additional amount of polyisocyanate has to be used, and this is undesirable for economic reasons.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,782,128 describes the application of tetraalkyl esters of aliphatic bisphosphoric acids, e.g. diethylene glycol bis(dipropyl phosphate) or 1,4-butylene glycol bis(dipropyl phosphate) as plasticizers for cellulose acetate.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,480 describes the application of tetraalkyl esters of aliphatic bisphosphoric acids, e.g. diethylene glycol bis(dibutyl phosphate) as hydraulic fluids.
It is an object of the present invention to provide halogen-free flame-retardant polyurethane foams with low fogging which comprise flame retardants that are simple to process.
This object is achieved via flame-retardant polyurethane foams which comprise, as flame retardant, halogen-free tetraalkyl bisphosphates which are free from hydoxy groups and whose molar mass is at least 350 g/mol.
The term “halogen-free” means that the tetraalkyl bisphosphates do not comprie the elements fluorine, chlorine, bromine and/or iodine. The term “free from hydroxy groups” means that the tetraalkyl bisphosphates bear no OH groups bonded to carbon atoms. The term “tetraalkyl bisphosphates” indicates organic substances which contain two phosphoric ester groups-O—P(═O)(OR)2 per molecule, where R is generally alkyl radicals and the alkyl radicals R present in a molecule may be identical or different.
The inventive polyurethane foams preferably comprise tetraalkyl bisphosphates of the general formula (I)
in which
In another particularly preferred embodiment, R1, R2, R3 and R4 are identical and are either ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl or n-butoxyethyl.
In one particularly preferred embodiment, A is a straight-chain C4-C6-alkylene radical, or likewise a group of the general formula (III)
in which
In particular, it is particularly preferable that the inventive polyurethane foams comprise one or more of the tetraalkyl bisphosphates of the following specific formulae (VIII) to (XII):
The tetraalkyl bisphosphates of the general formula (I) are preferably compounds that are liquid at processing temperatures. The processing temperature here is the temperature at which the polyurethane raw materials are fed to the metering and mixing assemblies of the foaming systems. Temperatures selected here are generally from 15 to 90° C., preferably from 20 to 80° C., as a function of the viscosities of the components and the design of the metering assemblies.
The tetraalkyl bisphosphates to be used according to the invention preferably have low volatility. This means that the volatility of the tetraalkyl bisphosphates to be used according to the invention is lower than the volatility of tris(chloroisopropyl)phosphate.
The tetraalkyl bisphosphates to be used according to the invention are preferably not reactive towards other starting materials used for production of polyurethane foams, in particular towards isocyanates. This statement refers to the reactivity explained above of flame retardants towards isocyanates.
The inventive, flame-retardant polyurethane foams are produced by reacting organic polyisocyanates with compounds having at least two hydrogen atoms reactive towards isocyanates, with conventional blowing agents, stabilizers, activators, and/or other conventional auxiliaries and additives, in the presence of halogen-free tetraalkyl bisphosphates free from hydroxy groups.
The amount used of the tetraalkyl bisphosphate is from 0.5 to 30 parts, preferably from 3 to 25 parts, based on 100 parts of polyol components.
The polyurethane foams are foams based on isocyanate and preferably having predominantly urethane groups and/or isocyanurate groups and/or allophanate groups and/or uretdione groups and/or urea groups and/or carbodiimide groups. The production of foams based on isocyanate is known and is described by way of example in DE-A 16 94 142, DE-A 16 94 215 and DE-A 17 20 768 and also in Kunststoff-Handbuch [Plastics handbook] Volume VII, Polyurethane [Polyurethanes], edited by G. Oertel, Carl-Hanser-Verlag Munich, Vienna 1993.
The envelope densities of the inventive polyurethane foams are preferably from 16 to 130 kg/m3. Their envelope densities are particularly preferably from 20 to 40 kg/m3.
The following starting components are used for production of the isocyanate-based foams:
The inventive polyurethane foams can therefore be produced in the form of rigid or flexible foams by selecting the starting materials appropriately in a manner easily found in the prior art.
Other starting components that can be used, if appropriate, are compounds having at least two hydrogen atoms reactive towards isocyanates and having a molecular weight of from 32 to 399. Here again, these are compounds having hydroxy groups and/or amino groups and/or thio groups and/or carboxy groups, preferably compounds having hydroxy groups and/or amino groups, which serve as chain extenders or crosslinking agents. These compounds generally have from 2 to 8, preferably from 2 to 4, hydrogen atoms reactive towards isocyanates. Examples here are likewise described in DE-A 28 32 253.
Other flame retardants which can be present alongside the tetraalkyl bisphosphates in the inventive polyurethane foams, if appropriate, are
Other examples of materials to be used concomitantly according to the invention, if appropriate, in the form of surfactant additives and foam stabilizers and also cell regulators, reaction retarders, stabilizers, flame-retardant substances, plasticizers, dyes and fillers and also substances having fungistatic and/or bacteriostatic action are described in Kunststoff-Handbuch [Plastics handbook], Volume VII, Carl-Hanser-Verlag, Munich, 1993, on pages 104-123, as also are details concerning use of these additives and their mode of action.
The present invention also provides a process for production of flame-retardant polyurethane foams via reaction of organic polyisocyanates with compounds having at least two hydrogen atoms reactive towards isocyanates, and conventional blowing agents, stabilizers, catalysts, activators and/or other conventional auxiliaries and additives at from 20 to 80° C., characterized in that an amount of from 0.5 to 30 parts, based on 100 parts of polyol component, of halogen-free tetraalkyl biphosphates whose molar mass is at least 350 g/mol which are free from hydroxy groups are used as flame retardant.
In one preferred embodiment, the inventive process uses tetraalkyl bisphosphates of the general formula (I)
in which
In another preferred embodiment, R1, R2, R3 and R4 are identical and are either ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl or n-butoxyethyl.
In another preferred embodiment, A is a straight-chain C4-C6-alkylene radical or likewise a group of the general formula (III)
in which
In particular, it is particularly preferable in the inventive process to use one or more of the tetraalkyl bisphosphates of the following specific formulae (VIII) to (XII).
In the conduct of the process for production of the inventive polyurethane foams, the reaction components described above are reacted by the known single-stage process, by the prepolymer process or by the semi-prepolymer process, often using machinery, e.g. machinery described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,764,565. Details concerning processing equipment which can also be used according to the invention are described in Kunststoff-Handbuch [Plastics handbook] Volume VII, Polyurethane [Polyurethanes], edited by G. Oertel, Carl-Hanser-Verlag, Munich, Vienna 1993, on pages 139-192.
The inventive process can also produce cold-curing foams (GB Patent 11 62 517, DE-A 21 53 086). However, it is of course also possible to produce foams via slab foaming or via the known twin-belt process.
The polyisocyanurate foams are produced using the processes and conditions known for this purpose.
The inventive process permits production of flame-retardant polyurethane foams in the form of rigid or flexible foams by a continuous or batchwise production method or in the form of foamed mouldings. Preference is given to the inventive process in production of flexible foams produced via a slab foaming process.
Examples of applications of the products obtainable according to the invention are the following: furniture padding, textile inserts, mattresses, seats, preferably aircraft seats or automobile seats, armrests and modules, and also seat coverings and cladding over technical equipment.
The tetraalkyl bisphosphates present in the inventive polyurethane foams or used in the inventive process are either known or can be produced by known methods. The starting materials used here are available on an industrial scale and permit easy production of the desired final products.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,480, examples 1 and 2, column 7, lines 4-38, describe the preparation of the compound (VIII) diethylene glycol bis(di-n-butyl phosphate), molar mass 491 g/mol, CAS reg. No. 62955-03-7, from diethylene glycol, phosphorus oxychloride and n-butanol.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,782,128, example 1, column 2, line 47-column 3, line 21, describes the preparation of the compound (IX) diethylene glycol bis(di-n-propyl phosphate), molar mass 434 g/mol, CAS reg. No. 109598-814, from diethylene glycol, phosphorus trichloride, chlorine and n-propanol.
The compound (X) diethylene glycol bis(diethyl phosphate), molar mass 378 g/mol, CAS reg. No. 500347-73-9, can be prepared by the process stated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,480 for preparation of the compound (VIII), using diethylene glycol, phosphorus oxychloride and ethanol.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,782,128, example 3, column 3, line 35-column 4, line 3, describes the preparation of the compound (XI) 1,4-butanediol bis(di-n-propyl phosphate), molar mass 418 g/mol, CAS reg. No. 10944143-2, from 1,4-butanediol, phosphorus trichloride, chlorine and n-propanol.
The compound (XII) 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol bis(diethyl phosphate), molar mass 416 g/mol, can be prepared by the process stated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,480, column 8, lines 5-39 for preparation of 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol bis(di-n-butyl phosphate), CAS reg. No. 62955-05-9, using 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, phosphorus oxychloride and ethanol.
The liquid tetraalkyl bisphosphates are easy to meter. They do not react with the other starting materials used for the production of the polyurethane foams and are therefore very easy to process as additives. Surprisingly, use of the tetraalkyl bisphosphates can give foams which not only meet the requirements for flame retardancy but also exhibit particularly low fogging values.
The examples below provide further illustration of the invention, but there is no intention of restricting the invention thereby.
Flexible Polyurethane Foam
The parts stated are based on weight.
Materials Used
Production of Flexible Polyurethane Foams
The components whose nature and amount is stated in table 1, with the exception of the diisocyanate (component G) were mixed to give a homogeneous mixture. The diisocyanate was then added and incorporated by brief and intensive stirring. After a cream time of from 15 to 20 s and a full rise time of from 200 to 220 s, the product was a flexible polyurethane foam whose envelope density was 33 kg/m3.
Determination of Flame Retardancy
The flexible polyurethane foams were tested to the specifications of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard FMVSS 302, and allocated to fire classes SE (self-extinguishing), SE/NBR (self-extinguishing/no burn rate), SE/B (self-extinguishing/with burn rate), BR (burn rate) and RB (rapid burning). For each example, the fire tests were carried out five times. Table 1 gives the porest result of each series of five.
Determination of Fogging
The fogging behaviour of the flexible polyurethane foams was studied to DIN 75201 B. Table 1 gives the amounts of condensate measured.
Results
In the absence of any flame retardant (comparative example CE1), the flexible polyurethane foam is rapidly consumed by combustion, but exhibits a very low fogging value. Modification with the frequently used flame retardant tris(chloroisopropyl)phosphate (comparative example CE2) lead to greatly increased fogging. A foam using tris(2,3-dichloroisopropyl)phosphate (comparative example CE3) complies with the fogging value required by the automobile industry of at most 1 mg of condensate and can achieve the best fire class SE (self-extinguishing) in all of the repeats of the fire test. However, tris(2,3-dichloroisopropyl)phosphate is associated with the disadvantages described above of a halogen-containing flame retardant. Although use of the halogen-free flame retardant diphenyl cresyl phosphate (comparative example CE4) overcomes this problem and also achieves a low fogging value, flame retardancy is inadequate. Inventive example 1 shows that the inventive, halogen-free flexible polyurethane foams feature the best fire class SE (self-extinguishing) in all of the repeats of the fire test, and feature a very low fogging value.
Rigid Polyurethane Foam
The parts stated are based on weight.
Materials Used
Production of Rigid Polyurethane Foams
The components whose nature and amount is stated in table 2, with the exception of the diisocyanate (component I) were mixed to give a homogeneous mixture. The diisocyanate was then added and incorporated by brief and intensive stirring. After a cream time of from 10 to 15 s and a full rise time of from 40 to 50 s, the product was a flexible polyurethane foam whose envelope density was 28 kg/m3.
Determination of Flame Retardancy
The rigid polyurethane foams were tested to the specifications of DIN 4102-1 and allocated to fire classes B2 (normal flammability) or B3 (high flammability). The flame height in this small burner test is determined with 15 s of flame application. It is a measure of the effectivity of a flame retardant.
Results
The experiments show that B2 classification is achieved using the halogen-containing flame retardant TCPP (comparative example CE5), whereas using the same amount of the halogen-free flame retardant TEP (comparative example CE6) only classification B3 can be achieved. In contrast, example IE2 using the inventive halogen-free flame retardant achieves classification B2 with smaller average flame height than comparative example 1 using the halogen-containing flame retardant TCPP.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 034 269.8 | Jul 2005 | DE | national |