Patent Grant
7055620
The invention is based on a hand power tool.
A hand power tool is made known in EP 0 303 651 B2, in fact, a hand-guided power drill having an electric motor located in a housing, via which an insertable tool situated in a tool mount or a drill bit is capable of being driven in a rotating manner. The hand power tool comprises a safety device with which an occurrence of “uncontrolled blockage” of the insertable tool is capable of being detected via a sensor, and a driving of the insertable tool can be halted.
An occurrence of uncontrolled blockage occurs when the insertable tool becomes jammed in the work piece to be worked, the reaction torque acting on the housing exceeds an operator's gripping force, and the housing turns, uncontrolled, around an axis with a certain angular velocity and over a certain angular range. If the operator's gripping force is greater than the existing reaction torque, and/or if the operator grips the hand power tool tightly during blockage, this is an occurrence of “controlled blockage”.
The safety device on the hand power tool made known in EP 0 303 651 B2 comprises a clutch located in a drive train of the hand power tool for interrupting the rotary-driving action when uncontrolled blockage occurs. Moreoever, the safety device comprises a holding device between the clutch and the insertable tool, via which the drive train is interconnected with the housing when uncontrolled blockage occurs. The holding device is formed by an electrically-actuatable brake.
The invention is based on a hand power tool having an electric motor located in a housing, via which an insertable tool situated in a tool mount is capable of being driven in a rotating manner, and comprising a safety device with which a characteristic value for an occurrence of uncontrolled blockage of the insertable tool can be detected via a sensor unit, and the movement of the housing can be decelerated.
It is proposed that the safety device is formed at least partially by a motor control unit, via which the electric motor can be actively decelerated if uncontrolled blockage of the insertable tool is detected. An additional braking or blocking unit can be avoided entirely or it can be designed to be particularly space-saving and lightweight. Additional components, weight, installation space, installation expense and costs can be spared. With the safety device having a simple construction, problems associated with reversal and wear on an additional braking device can be prevented. The safety device can basically be used with all hand power tools, the insertable tools of which are capable of being driven in a rotating manner, as is the case, for example, with angle grinders and routers, circular saws, chain saws, etc., and, in particular, with hand-guided power drills, impact drills, and drill hammers.
In principle, all electric motors appearing suitable to one skilled in the art—such as asynchronous motors, synchronous motors, or DC devices, etc., for example—can be actively decelerated via a special motor control unit, via a brake control. Particularly advantageously, the electric motor is formed by an electronically commutated motor, however. Brushless, electronically commutated motors—reluctance motors, in particular—are particularly overload-tolerant and can be loaded for short durations with a high level of torque and, therefore, a high level of braking torque. A high amount of current can flow without the risk of brush sparking.
Furthermore, an armature of the electronically commutated electric motor can be designed having an overall smaller mass due to the absence of an armature winding as compared with an armature of a conventional electric motor having an armature winding. As a result, the armature of the electronically commutated electric motor stores a small amount of rotational energy during operation and can be decelerated rapidly using little energy. The electronically commutated electric motor can be advantageously decelerated with a large intermediate-circuit capacitor or with a brake chopper in a brake circuit.
If a motor control unit is designed at least partially integral with an already-present power control unit of the electric motor, then components, installation space, and weight can be advantageously spared. In the case of electronically commutated motors in particular, the motor control unit can easily be designed integral with a power control unit of the electric motor.
If the motor control unit is combined with a small, space-saving, separate braking unit, the housing can be advantageously decelerated—if uncontrolled blockage occurs—with minimal load on the motor. The separate braking unit can comprise various designs, e.g., it can be formed by a mechanical or an electromechanical unit, etc.
The sensor unit can comprise various sensors appearing suitable to one skilled in the art, e.g., electronic, electromechanical, and/or mechanical sensors, via which, however, it should be possible to detect an angular velocity and an angular acceleration of the housing, as well as an angular range covered by the housing. Particularly advantageously, the sensor unit comprises at least one electronic sensor. Said electronic sensor can be designed to be small and lightweight, and it can be integrated, particularly advantageously, in space-saving fashion in small hand power tools. The information from the sensor to the motor control unit can be transmitted via electric lines, via radio, optically and/or mechanically, etc.
Further advantages result from the following description of the drawing. An exemplary embodiment of the invention is shown in the drawing. The drawing, the description, and the claims contain numerous features in combination. One skilled in the art will advantageously consider them individually as well and combine them into reasonable further combinations.
A pinion 28 is formed on an end of a shaft 26 of the electric motor 12 facing an axis of rotation an insertable tool 16, which said pinion meshes with a spur gear 30 supported on a bearing bolt 44. A pinion 32 is formed on an end of the bearing bolt 44 facing the axis of rotation, which said pinion meshes with a ring gear 36 located on a drilling spindle 34. The tool mount 14 is capable of being driven via the drilling spindle 34.
If the insertable tool 16 driven by the drilling spindle 34 becomes blocked, and the gripping force of an operator on two handles 38, 40 of the drill hammer is weaker than a reaction torque occurring on the housing 10, then an amount of torque is transferred from the electric motor 12 via the shaft 26, the gears 28, 30, 32, 36 and the drilling spindle 34 to the housing 10, and the housing 10 is accelerated uncontrollably against the original rotational motion of the insertable tool 16 with a rotational motion around the axis of rotation of the insertable tool 16. This rotational motion is detected by the sensor unit 20 with an electronic acceleration sensor 42 and evaluated with an evaluation unit 46. If a certain angular acceleration and a certain traversed angular range are pressent, a pulse is forwarded from the evaluation unit 46 to the motor control unit 22.
The motor control unit 22 triggers an active deceleration of the electric motor 12, in such a fashion, in fact, that electromagnetically-produced forces of the electric motor 12 act against the direction rotation of the shaft 26. The motor control unit 22 is adjusted in such a fashion and/or it produces via the electric motor 12 a braking torque of such a magnitude that the housing 10 and/or the drill hammer comes to a standstill after an angular range of less than 30° has been covered, and a danger to the operator can be ruled out.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 17 121 | Apr 2001 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/DE02/00477 | 2/9/2002 | WO | 00 | 12/3/2002 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO02/081153 | 10/17/2002 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4063600 | Krzes | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4250436 | Weissman | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4487270 | Huber | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4534420 | Goldelius | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4539500 | Houben et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4546834 | Menzel | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4650375 | Millsap | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4766963 | Hartwig | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4871033 | Odoni et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 5014793 | Germanton | May 1991 | A |
| 5358062 | Uhl et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5401124 | Hettich | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5584619 | Guzzella | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5648706 | Polk et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5672922 | Raichle et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677586 | Horst | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5831402 | Yang | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5868208 | Peisert et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5914882 | Yeghiazarians | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918685 | Ulbrich et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5954457 | Stock et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5996707 | Thome et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6044918 | Noser et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6111515 | Schaer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6236177 | Zick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6415875 | Meixner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6484814 | Bongers-Ambrosius | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6520266 | Bongers-Ambrosius et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6651860 | Artmann et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6758288 | Richter et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 39 38 787 | May 1991 | DE |
| 43 34 933 | Apr 1995 | DE |
| 43 44 817 | Jun 1995 | DE |
| 44 01 686 | Jun 1995 | DE |
| 196 41 618 | Apr 1998 | DE |
| 0 666 148 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 303 651 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030116332 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |
