1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to hand-held pipettes employing axially reciprocating pistons to aspirate and dispense fluids into and out of replaceable pipette tips, and is concerned in particular with an improved actuator assembly and associated system for automatically controlling the stroke of such pistons.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Hand-held pipettes with manually driven pistons and automatic stroke control mechanisms have been known for nearly a decade.
The rear stop 20 forms part of a frame 26 slidably mounted on a guide shaft 28 supported by the housing in parallel relationship to the plunger shaft 16. A stepper motor 30 has its output screw shaft 32 threaded through an upper part of the frame 26. The motor is operable to automatically shift the frame 26 along the guide shaft 28, resulting in a corresponding adjustment of the rear stop 20 and a corresponding adjustment to the stroke of the piston 12.
One problem with this type of automatic stroke adjustment is that when advancing the rear stop 20 towards the forward stop 24 in order to reduce the length of the piston stroke, the motor 30 must work against a gradually increasing biasing force being exerted by the spring 22. Thus, the motor either must be sized large enough to overcome this biasing force, or the plunger shaft 16 must be depressed to unload the rear stop prior to making any stroke adjustment. Larger motors contribute disadvantageously to the size and cost of the unit, whereas the need to preliminarily unload the rear stop unduly complicates the stroke adjustment sequence. Larger motors also consume more power, thus requiring larger batteries, which further adds to the size and weight of the unit.
Another problem stems from the fact that the initial or “starting” force required to depress the plunger shaft 16 will vary, depending on the extent to which the spring 22 has been compressed in response to prior adjustments of the rear stop 20. Such variations in starting force can distract laboratory personnel from the task of precisely aspirating and dispensing fluids.
The parallel arrangement of the plunger shaft 16 and motor output shaft 32 also contributes disadvantageously to the overall size of the housing and hence the weight of the unit, making it more expensive to manufacture and less convenient to use.
The present invention has as its overall objective the provision of a hand-held manually-driven pipette incorporating an improved stroke adjustment mechanism that obviates or at least substantially minimizes the above described problems.
In accordance with the present invention, a hand-held pipette includes a housing provided with a chamber and internal mutually spaced first and second stops. A replaceable pipette tip is arranged in fluid communication with the chamber, and a reciprocating piston coacts with the chamber to aspirate and dispense fluids into and out of the pipette tip. An actuator assembly is operable to reciprocate the piston. The actuator assembly has an overall length subdivided into first and second sections provided respectively with first and second contact surfaces.
The actuator assembly is resiliently urged into a rest position at which the first contact surface is in contact with the first stop and the second contact surface is spaced from the second stop by a control distance. The actuator assembly is arranged to reciprocate between its rest position and an advanced position at which the second contact surface is in contact with the second stop and the first contact surface is spaced from the first stop, with the stroke of the actuator assembly and the stroke of the piston being equal to the control distance.
A motor-driven mechanism is arranged to displace one section of the actuator assembly relative to the other section, resulting in a corresponding change to both the overall length of the actuator assembly and the control distance.
Preferred embodiments of pipettes in accordance with the present invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
With reference initially to
A fixed collar 52 is fitted into the bottom end of the hollow guide 48. A floating collar 54 is resiliently urged by a spring 56 against an interior ledge 58 on the hollow guide 48. A tapered interior shoulder on the collar 52 defines a first stop 60, and the upper rim of floating collar 54 defines a second stop 62.
A chamber 64 is aligned axially with the hollow chassis guide 48. The chamber projects downwardly from the lower end of the housing to a distal bottom end configured to releasably hold a detachable pipette tip 65.
An actuator assembly includes the following axially aligned components: a stepper drive motor 66 having an output shaft with a threaded upper end 68 and an oppositely extending bottom end 70 carrying an encoder wheel 72; a tubular sleeve 74 slidably extending through the floating collar 54 into the hollow guide 48, with its upper end externally threaded to receive a reference collar 76 and plunger 88, and its lower end internally threaded to receive the upper end 68 of the motor output shaft; an encoder housing 78 including an upper part 78a fixed to the underside of the motor 66, and a lower part 78b defining the bottom end of the actuator assembly. A piston 80 has its upper end engaged by the lower part 78b of the encoder housing, and its lower end projecting through a seal assembly 82 into the upper end of chamber 64.
Although the piston 80 is shown engaged directly by the bottom end of the actuator assembly, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other means may be provided for establishing a mechanical coupling between these two components. For example, an intermediate linkage might be employed, which would be of advantage in cases where the piston and actuator assembly are not aligned axially.
A tapered nose on motor 66 defines a first contact surface 84, and the lower rim of reference collar 76 defines a second contact surface 86. The actuator assembly may be viewed as being subdivided into a first section comprised of the motor 66 and encoder housing 78, and a second section comprised of the tubular sleeve 74, reference collar 76 and plunger 80, with the two sections being interconnected by the threaded upper end 68 of the motor output shaft.
As can best be seen in
By manually depressing plunger 88, the actuator assembly can be axially shifted against the biasing force of springs 90 from its rest position to a first advanced position as shown in
Fluid may be aspirated into the pipette tip 65 by advancing the actuator assembly to its first advanced position, then submerging the pipette tip into the fluid, and then allowing the actuator assembly to return to its rest position. The thus aspirated fluid may then be dispensed by again advancing the actuator assembly to its first advanced position.
In order to ensure that all of the aspirated fluid has been dispensed, the piston assembly may be further advanced against the biasing action of both spring 56 and springs 90 to a second advanced or “blow out” position as shown in
The control distance “S” of the actuator assembly may be adjusted automatically by energizing the stepper motor 66 to rotate its output shaft 68 in the appropriate direction. Thus, as shown for example in
As can best be seen in
As shown in
The motor 66 is connected by a flexible connector 102 to a battery 104 which may be conveniently accessed by removing cover 44. The motor is controlled by a system with a feedback loop which includes the encoder wheel 72 carried by the lower end 70 of the motor output shaft. An optical sensor 106 is connected by connector 102 to a microprocessor on a PC board 108. As can be best seen in
The optical sensor includes a light source 114 and a photo cell 116 arranged respectively on opposite sides of the encoder wheel 72. The encoder wheel teeth and slots 110, 112 are aligned between the two sensor elements 114, 116.
With this arrangement, the photocell 116 generates position signals responsive to the light and dark patterns generated by rotation of the encoder wheel 72. The position signals are fed back to the microprocessor. The double width tooth 110′ and slot 112′ each provide positive reference locations 180° apart. Preferably, the total number of teeth 110 and slots 112 equals the number of steps per revolution of the stepper motor 66, thus making it possible to recognize every step movement of the motor.
The control system will count each step of motor rotation, and will look for the appearance of the double width tooth 110′ and slot 112′ at expected intervals. Failure of the double width tooth or slot to appear at its expected interval will provide an indication that the pipette is in need of resetting, thereby enabling the control system to correct itself by relocating the respective double width tooth or slot at its expected location.
The stepper motor 66 may be operated in response to command signals input manually on an external key pad, and/or by audible commands received via a microphone 118 and processed by a voice recognition system embodied in the microprocessor.
When the plunger 88 is depressed during an aspirating and dispensing cycle, as shown for example in
In light of the foregoing, it will now be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention provides significant advantages over previously developed pipettes of the type illustrated for example in
Of particular significance is the departure from stop adjustments in favor of adjustments to the length of the actuator assembly, thus making it possible to effect piston stroke adjustments without first having to relieve the biasing forces being exerted by spring components. Axial alignment of the piston, operating plunger and stepper motor favors compactness, which in turn reduces costs and enhances the ease with which the pipette may be handled and operated by laboratory personnel.
The feedback control system enables precise control and monitoring of stroke adjustments, with the ability to recognize errors and reset itself when necessary.
By shifting the upper section of the actuator assembly in relation to the lower section, with the latter being resiliently retained in the rest position with its first contact surface 84 in contact with the first stop 60, a further advantage is realized in that the magnitude of the resulting stroke can be visually assessed as a function of the extent to which the plunger 88 projects from the top of the housing. Thus, a maximum stroke will be referenced by a maximum plunger projection, as indicated at “Pmax” in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3142719 | Farr | Jul 1964 | A |
3197285 | Rosen | Jul 1965 | A |
3558014 | Wood et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3732735 | Cohen | May 1973 | A |
3754687 | Norton | Aug 1973 | A |
3767364 | Ritchie et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3769178 | Rothermel, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3786683 | Berman et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3827305 | Gilson et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3853012 | Scordato et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3915651 | Nishi | Oct 1975 | A |
3918308 | Reed | Nov 1975 | A |
3933048 | Scordato | Jan 1976 | A |
3954014 | Andrews, Jr. et al. | May 1976 | A |
3991617 | Marteau d'Autry | Nov 1976 | A |
4009611 | Koffer et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4061037 | Keegan | Dec 1977 | A |
4096751 | Withers et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4151750 | Suovaniemi et al. | May 1979 | A |
4164870 | Scordato et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4197735 | Munzer et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4257267 | Parsons | Mar 1981 | A |
4283950 | Tervamaki | Aug 1981 | A |
4345483 | Paletta et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4369665 | Citrin | Jan 1983 | A |
4399711 | Klein | Aug 1983 | A |
4399712 | Oshikubo et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4433795 | Maiefski et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4470317 | Sabloewski et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4475666 | Bilbrey et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4489618 | Meyer | Dec 1984 | A |
4517850 | Wiseman et al. | May 1985 | A |
4519258 | Jakubowicz | May 1985 | A |
4563907 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4567780 | Oppenlander et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4586546 | Mezei et al. | May 1986 | A |
RE32210 | D'Autry | Jul 1986 | E |
4616514 | Magnussen, Jr. et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4671123 | Magnussen et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4763535 | Rainin et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4790176 | Marteau d'Autry | Dec 1988 | A |
4801434 | Kido et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4821586 | Scordato et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4824642 | Lyman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4896270 | Kalmakis et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4909991 | Oshikubo | Mar 1990 | A |
4965050 | Jessop | Oct 1990 | A |
4967604 | Arpagaus et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4988481 | Jarvimaki et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4995532 | Knodel | Feb 1991 | A |
4999164 | Puchinger et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002737 | Tervamaki | Mar 1991 | A |
5012682 | Sabloewski et al. | May 1991 | A |
5018394 | Gilson | May 1991 | A |
5090255 | Kenney | Feb 1992 | A |
5104625 | Kenney | Apr 1992 | A |
5174961 | Smith | Dec 1992 | A |
5187990 | Magnussen, Jr. et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192511 | Roach | Mar 1993 | A |
5320810 | Al-Mahareeq et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5343769 | Suovaniemi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5347878 | Suovaniemi | Sep 1994 | A |
5364596 | Magnussen, Jr. et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5389341 | Tuunanen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403553 | Heinonen | Apr 1995 | A |
5406856 | Kuhn | Apr 1995 | A |
5435197 | Telimaa et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5481900 | Husar | Jan 1996 | A |
5505097 | Suovaniemi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511433 | Sabloewski et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5531131 | Sabloewski | Jul 1996 | A |
5573729 | Belgardt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591408 | Belgardt et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611784 | Barresi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614153 | Homberg | Mar 1997 | A |
5620660 | Belgardt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620661 | Schurbrock | Apr 1997 | A |
5696330 | Heinonen | Dec 1997 | A |
5807524 | Kelly et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5844686 | Treptow et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849248 | Homberg | Dec 1998 | A |
5970806 | Telimaa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983733 | Strandberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998218 | Conley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6074611 | Flesher | Jun 2000 | A |
6090348 | Steele et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6133045 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6158292 | Gilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168761 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170343 | Conley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171553 | Petrek | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182719 | Yahiro | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197259 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199435 | Wilmer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6248295 | Petrek | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249717 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254826 | Acosta et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254832 | Rainin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295880 | Gilson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324925 | Suuvaniemi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6428750 | Rainin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6532837 | Magnussen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6601433 | Kriz et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6715369 | Baba et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
20020001545 | Cronenberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020020233 | Baba et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030099578 | Cote et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0737515 | Dec 2001 | EP |
2071052 | Sep 1971 | FR |
03186353 | Aug 1991 | JP |
WO9105609 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 0157490 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0200345 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO03033151 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050262951 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |