The present invention relates to fiber-coupled scintillation detectors and to methods of their manufacture, and to systems and methods of x-ray inspection employing fiber-coupled scintillation detectors for efficient detection of x-rays.
Fiber-coupled scintillation detectors of radiation and particles have been employed over the course of the past 30 years. In some cases, the scintillator is pixelated, consisting of discrete scintillator elements, and in other cases, other stratagems are employed (such as orthogonally crossed coupling fibers) in order to provide spatial resolution. Examples of fiber-coupled scintillation detectors are provided by U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,052 (to DiFilippo) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,9933 (to Katagiri et al.), both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Detectors described both by DiFilippo and Katagiri et al. employ wavelength-shifting fibers (WSF) such that light reemitted by the core material of the fiber may be conducted, with low attenuation, to photo-detectors disposed at a convenient location, often distant from the scintillator itself. Spatial resolution is of particular value in applications such as neutron imaging. Spatial resolution is also paramount in the Fermi Large Area Space Telescope (formerly, GLAST) where a high-efficiency segmented scintillation detector employs WSF readout for detection of high-energy cosmic rays, as described in Moiseev, et al., High efficiency plastic scintillator detector with wavelength-shifting fiber readout for the GLAST Large Area Telescope, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 583, pp. 372-81 (2007), which is incorporated herein by reference.
Because of the contexts in which fiber-coupled scintillator detectors have been employed to date, all known fiber-coupled scintillator detectors have counted pulses produced by individual interactions of particles (photons or massive particles) with the scintillator, thereby allowing the energy deposited by the incident particle to be ascertained based on the cumulative flux of light reemitted by the scintillator.
The detection requirements of x-ray backscatter inspection systems, however, are entirely different from the requirements addressed by existing fiber-coupled scintillation detectors. Backscatter x-ray inspection systems have been used for more than 25 years to detect organic materials concealed inside baggage, cargo containers, in vehicles, and on personnel. Because organic materials in bulk preferentially scatter x-rays (by Compton scattering) rather than absorb them, these materials appear as brighter objects in backscatter images. Insofar as incident x-rays are scattered into all directions, sensitivity far overrides spatial resolution as a requirement, and in most scatter applications, detector spatial resolution is of no concern at all, since resolution is governed by the incident beam rather than by detection.
The specialized detection requirements of large area and high sensitivity posed by x-ray scatter systems are particularly vexing in the case of “conventional” scintillation detectors 100 of the type shown in a side cross-section in
For an imaging detector, the photon statistical noise is calculated in terms of the photons absorbed by the detector and used to generate the image. Any photons which pass through the detector without being absorbed, or even those that are absorbed without generating image information, are wasted and do not contribute to reducing noise in the image. Since photons cannot be subdivided, they represent the fundamental quantum level of a system. It is common practice to calculate the statistical noise in terms of the smallest number of quanta used to represent the image anywhere along the imaging chain. The point along the imaging chain where the fewest number of quanta are used to represent the image is called a “quantum sink”. The noise level at the quantum sink determines the noise limit of the imaging system. Without increasing the number of information carriers (i.e., quanta) at the quantum sink, the system noise limit cannot be improved. Poor light collection can possibly create a secondary quantum sink, which is to say that it will limit the fraction of incident x-rays resulting in PMT current. Moreover, it will increase image noise. Light collection efficiency can be improved by increasing the sensitive area of the photo-detectors, however, that path to efficiency is costly.
The structure of scintillating screen typically employed in prior art x-ray scintillation detectors is now described with reference to
Therefore, it would be advantageous to have a scintillation detector for x-ray scatter detection applications that provides for more efficient extraction, collection, and detection of scintillation light.
As briefly discussed at the outset above, wavelength-shifting fibers (WSF) have long been employed for scintillation detection. Wavelength shifting fibers consist of a core with relatively high refractive index, surrounded by one or more cladding layers of lower refractive index. The core contains wavelength-shifting material, also referred as dye. Scintillation light which enters the fiber is absorbed by the dye which, in turn, emits light with a longer wavelength. The longer wavelength light is emitted isotropically in the fiber material. Total internal reflection traps a fraction of that light and conducts it over long distances with relatively low loss. This is possible, as described with reference to
Scintillator structures have been produced using many manufacturing technologies, including, for example, die-casting, injection molding (as described by Yoshimura et al., Plastic scintillator produced by the injection-molding technique, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 406, pp. 435-41 (1998), and extrusion, (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,067,079, to Bross, et al.), both of which references are incorporated herein by reference.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, systems and methods are provided that apply fiber-coupled scintillation detectors to problems in backscatter and transmission x-ray inspection.
For convenience of notation, a wavelength-shifted fiber-coupled scintillation detector may be referred to herein as an “Sc-WSF” detector.
In a first embodiment of the present invention, a detector of penetrating radiation is provided that has an unpixelated volume of scintillation medium for converting energy of incident penetrating radiation into scintillation light. The detector has multiple optical waveguides, aligned substantially parallel to each other over a scintillation light extraction region that is contiguous with the unpixelated volume of the scintillation medium, The optical waveguides guide light derived from the scintillation light to a photo-detector for detecting photons guided by the waveguides and for generating a detector signal.
In other embodiments of the present invention, the detector may also have an integrating circuit for integrating the detector signal over a specified duration of time.
In an alternate embodiment of the invention, a detector of penetrating radiation is provided that has a volume of scintillation medium for converting energy of incident penetrating radiation into scintillation light and a plurality of optical waveguides, aligned substantially parallel to each other over a scintillation light extraction region contiguous with the volume of the scintillation medium. The optical waveguides guide light derived from the scintillation light to a photo-detector that generates a detector signal. Finally, an integrating circuit for integrating the detector signal over a specified duration of time.
In further embodiments of the invention, the optical waveguides in the foregoing detectors may be adapted for wavelength shifting of the scintillation light and, more particularly, may be wavelength-shifting optical fibers. The scintillation medium may include a lanthanide-doped barium mixed halide such as barium fluorochloride. The photo-detector may include a photomultiplier.
In yet further embodiments of the invention, the square of the thickness of any of the foregoing detectors, divided by the area of the detector, may be less than 0.001. At least one of the plurality of waveguides may lacks cladding and the scintillation medium may be characterized by an index of refraction of lower value than an index of refraction characterizing the waveguide. The optical waveguides may be disposed in multiple parallel planes, each of the parallel planes containing a subset of the plurality of optical waveguides.
In other embodiments of the invention, the detector may have a plurality of layers of scintillator medium successively encountered by an incident beam, and the layers may be characterized by distinct spectral sensitivities to the incident beam. Alternating layers of scintillator may include Li6F:ZnS(Ag) alternating with at least one of fiber-coupled BaFCl(Eu) and fiber-coupled BaFI(Eu). A first of the plurality of layers of scintillator medium may be a wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled detector preferentially sensitive to lower-energy x-rays, and a last of the plurality of layers of scintillator medium may be a plastic scintillator.
Segments of scintillator medium may be disposed in a plane transverse to a propagation direction of an incident beam, and may be distinctly coupled to photo-detectors via optical fibers.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing a scintillation detector, the method comprising extruding a shell of scintillating material around an optical waveguide, and, in a particular embodiment, the optical waveguide is a wavelength-shifting optical fiber.
In an alternate embodiment, a method for detecting scattered x-ray radiation has steps of:
In another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for detecting scattered x-ray radiation. The method has steps of:
A mobile x-ray inspection system is provided in accordance with another embodiment. The inspection system has a source of x-ray radiation disposed upon a conveyance having a platform and ground-contacting members, and a fiber-coupled scintillation detector deployed outside the conveyance during inspection operation for detecting x-rays that have interacted with the inspected object.
The mobile x-ray inspection system may also have a fiber-coupled scintillation awning detector deployed above the inspected object during a course of inspection, and the awning detector may slide out from a roof of the conveyance prior to inspection operation. There may also be a skirt detector deployed beneath the platform of the conveyance, and a roof detector for detection of spaces higher than the conveyance, as well as substantially horizontal and substantially upright fiber-coupled scintillator detector segments. The substantially horizontal and substantially upright fiber-coupled scintillator detector segments may be formed into an integral structure.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is provided for detecting radiation incident upon the apparatus, the apparatus comprising:
In accordance with an alternate embodiment of the invention, a top-down imaging inspection system is provided for inspecting an object disposed on an underlying surface. The top-down imaging inspection system has a source of substantially downward pointing x-rays and a linear detector array disposed within a protrusion above the underlying surface. The linear detector array may include wavelength-shifted fiber-coupled scintillation detectors.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an x-ray inspection system is provided for inspecting an underside of a vehicle. The x-ray inspection system has a source of substantially upward pointing x-rays coupled to a chassis and a wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled scintillator detector disposed on the chassis for detecting x-rays scattered by the vehicle and by objects concealed under or within the vehicle. The chassis may be adapted to be maneuvered under the vehicle by at least one of motor and manual control.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the optical coupling of scintillator material to optical waveguides, and, more particularly, to wavelength-shifting fibers, advantageously enables objectives including those peculiar to the demands of x-ray scatter detection.
Definitions
The term “image” shall refer to any unidimensional or multidimensional representation, whether in tangible or otherwise perceptible form, or otherwise, whereby a value of some characteristic (such as fractional transmitted intensity through a column of an inspected object traversed by an incident beam, in the case of x-ray transmission imaging) is associated with each of a plurality of locations (or, vectors in a Euclidean space, typically 2) corresponding to dimensional coordinates of an object in physical space, though not necessarily mapped one-to-one thereonto. An image may comprise an array of numbers in a computer memory or holographic medium. Similarly, “imaging” refers to the rendering of a stated physical characteristic in terms of one or more images.
Terms of spatial relation, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe the relationship of one element to another as shown in the figures. It will be understood that such terms of spatial relation are intended to encompass different orientations of the apparatus in use or operation in addition to the orientation described and/or depicted in the figures.
Where an element is described as being “on,” “connected to,” or “coupled to” another element, it may be directly on, connected or coupled to the other element, or, alternatively, one or more intervening elements may be present, unless otherwise specified.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments and is not intended to be limiting. The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” are intended to include the plural forms as well.
WSF Detectors
Referring, first, to
One advantage to using composite scintillation screen in the present application is that it allows for fabrication by extrusion of a fiber-coupled scintillation detector.
Composite scintillator 403 is structurally supported by exterior layers 404 of plastic, or other material, providing mechanical support. Optical contact between the fiber cladding 401 and the composite scintillator 403 is established by filling the voids with index-matching material 405 of suitable refractive index which is transparent to the scintillation light. The refractive index of the filling material is chosen to optimize the collection of primary light photons into the WSF and the capture of wavelength-shifted photons in the fiber. Filling material 405 may be optical grease or optical epoxy, for example, though any material is within the scope of the present invention.
Upon incidence of x-ray photons, scintillation light emitted by scintillator 403 is coupled via cladding 401 into core 407 of the respective fibers, down-shifted in frequency (i.e., red-shifted) and propagated to one or more photo-detectors 805 (shown in
Referring now to
In yet another embodiment of the invention, described now with reference to
A wavelength-shifting polymer optical fiber may be manufactured, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention now described with reference to the system schematic depicted in
For all embodiments of a scintillation detector in accordance with the present invention, it is advantageous that the thickness of the scintillator material be optimized for the energy of the radiation to be detected. The design should ensure sufficient light collection to avoid a secondary quantum sink. In particular, embodiments of the invention described herein provide for detectors of extraordinary thinness relative to their area.
Definitions: For purposes of the present description, and in any appended claims, the term “thickness,” as applied to a scintillation detector, shall represent the mean extent of the detector in a dimension along, or parallel to, a centroid of the field of view of the detector. The term area, as applied to a detector, or, equivalently, the term “active area” shall refer to the size of the detector measured in a plane transverse to centroid of all propagation vectors of radiation within the field of view of the detector.
Embodiments of the present invention, even those with as many as 8 WSF layers, have ratios of the square of detector thickness to the active detector area that are less than 0.001. For example, an 8-layer detector with an area of 48″×12″ has a thickness no greater than 0.5″, such that the ratio of the square of the thickness to the detector area is 0.0005. This thickness-squared-to-area ratio is typically an order of magnitude, or more, smaller than the comparable ratio for backscatter detectors where scintillator light is directly detected by a photo-detector.
In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention depicted in
An embodiment of a wavelength-shifted scintillator detector in accordance with the present invention is shown in
In accordance with various of the embodiments heretofore described, the ends of the WSF are bundled and optically coupled to at least one photo detector. Examples of suitable photo detectors include PMTs and silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs).
Advantages of the detector, the invention of which is described herein, include the efficiency of detection, and the low geometrical profile of implementation. This allows greater freedom in designing a detection system and it makes entirely new, space constrained applications possible. The mechanical flexibility of the detector structure allows shaping the detector surface to conform to the application, such as an implementation in which an imaged object is surrounded by detector volume. The low profile also makes it relatively easy to orient and shield the detector area in ways to minimize the detection of unwanted scatter radiation (crosstalk) from a nearby x-ray imaging system.
The extraction of scintillation light over a large region of scintillator enables detectors of large width-to-depth aspect ratio. In particular, detectors subtending spatial angles of 0.1 sr, of more, are facilitated by embodiments of the present invention.
In a typical backscatter x-ray imaging system, an x-ray pencil beam scans an imaged target in a linear motion, while elongated radiation detectors are arranged on both sides of an exit aperture of an x-ray source. As the pencil beam moves, the detector area closest to the beam will typically receive the strongest signal and detector area further from the beam less. If the detector area is segmented into individually readable sections the signal to noise ratio of the detection system can be improved by only reading the segments with a good signal to noise ratio and neglecting the segments which would contribute predominantly noise to the summed signal. The selection of contributing detector segments can be made based on the actually detected signal or based on the known position of the pencil beam.
Advantages of Scintillator Fabrication by Extrusion
The extrusion, or “automated coating” process, described above with reference to
Deployable Detectors to Increase Geometric Efficiency of Scattered X-Rays
Some mobile x-ray systems, such as those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,764,683, to Swift, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,099,434, to Chalmers et al., both of which are incorporated herein by reference, use the method of backscattered x-rays (BX) to inspect cars and trucks from one side. The former uses detectors deployed outside a conveyance during operation, whereas the latter uses a detector area entirely contained within an enclosure, namely the skin of a conveyance. Both use large-area detectors to maximize the efficiency of detecting the scattered x-rays. The areal backscatter detector coverage in the case of a product in accordance with the teachings of the Chalmers '434 Patent covers on the order of 20 square feet of the interior surface of an enclosure that faces the target. This covert detector area has relatively poor geometrical efficiency for collecting the scattered radiation from high or low targets. The intrinsically deep geometrical profile of such detectors, necessary for direct capture of the scintillation light by photomultipliers, is inimical to deployment outside the van.
Definitions: As used herein, and in any appended claims, the term “large-area detector” shall refer to any single detector, or to any detector module, subtending an opening angle of at least 30° in each of two orthogonal transverse directions as viewed from a point on an object undergoing inspection, equivalently, characterized by a spatial angle of at least π steradians.
A “conveyance” shall be any device characterized by a platform borne on ground-contacting members such as wheels, tracks, treads, skids, etc., used for transporting equipment from one location to another.
An Sc-WSF detector, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, makes practical the unobtrusive storage of large-area detectors that can be quickly deployed outside the van in positions that substantially enhance detection efficiency.
Referring, now, to
Scanning pencil beams of x-rays not only reveal interior objects by analyzing the backscattered radiation but, in some applications, can obtain additional information by the simultaneous analysis of transmission (TX) and forward scattered (FX) radiation. The TX and FX detectors need not be segmented since the cross-sectional area of the pencil beam, together with the integration time of the signal, defines the pixel size. Moreover, the TX and FX detectors only need to be total energy detectors since, in most applications, the flux of the TX or FX x-rays is too high for pulse counting. Scintillation screens are the traditional detectors for such scanning beam applications. Sc-WSF detectors substantially extend the range of applications of present TX and FX scintillation detectors, as the following examples make clear.
TX for X-Ray Beams Up to at Least 250 keV
The absorption efficiency of traditional scintillation screens, made, for example, of BaFCl(Eu) or Gadox, drops below 50% for x-ray energies above ˜80 keV. The 50% point for two layers is about 100 keV. By way of distinction, Sc-WSF detector can be made with more than two layers of scintillators without substantially increasing the profile of the detector. A cost-effective Sc-WSF detector, with 4 layers, can be used for TX with scanning x-ray beams generated by a standard 140 keV x-ray tube. A multi-layer detector such as the 9-layer detector, as shown in
Transportable TX Detector for Top-Down Imager in Three-Sided Portal Inspection
The thin profile of the multi-layer transmission (TX) detector makes practical a top-of-the-road transmission (TX) detector.
Segmented TX Detector for Determining the Scan Beam Intensity Profile
Referring now to
The relative position of the detector plane and the plane of scanning x-rays can be controlled automatically. The detector for this concept is shown schematically in
With a single data channel for a transmission signal, the spatial resolution along the traffic direction (transverse to a fan-shaped illuminating x-ray beam) is determined by the smaller of the following two dimensions: the width of the sensitive detector area or the beam size across the TX detector. (For heuristic purposes, the case of undersampling is not considered in this description.) Spatial resolution may be improved, however, by narrowing the sensitive detector area, as now described with reference to
Another configuration within the scope of the present invention include a combination of the vertical detector 1141 shown in
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a transmission detector array 1450 (regardless of geometrical orientation, whether vertical, horizontal, L-shaped, etc.) is segmented into a plurality of units; such as B, C and A of
Dual-Energy and Multi-Energy TX Detectors for Material Identification
Separating the signals from front and back layers of scintillators allows the front layer to give a measure of the low-energy component of each pixel while the back layer gives a measure of the high-energy components. Putting a layer of absorbing material between the front and back scintillators is a standard way to enhance the difference between low and high energy components, and that is easily done with a Sc-WSF detector.
The Sc-WSF detector makes practical a dual-energy detector consisting of a layer of Sc-WSF, such as BaFCl-WSF, on top of a plastic scintillator detector; the BaFCl is sensitive to the low-energy x-rays and not the high-energy x-rays, while the plastic detector is sensitive to the high-energy x-rays and very insensitive to low energy x-rays.
An alternative and potentially more effective material discriminator can be made by using more than two independent layers of Sc-WSF, with separate readouts for each layer. A passive absorber, such as an appropriate thickness of copper, can be inserted after the top Sc-WSF to enhance dual energy application, as is practiced with segmented detectors. Alternatively, the middle scintillator can be used as an active absorbing layer. The measurement of three independent parameters allows one to get a measure of both the average atomic number of the traversed materials and the extent of beam hardening as well. The Sc-WSF can be further extended to obtain more than three energy values for each pixel, the limit being the statistical uncertainties, which increase with the number of components. Detector 1400 shown in
An important application of Dual-Energy TX is for x-ray personnel scanners at airport terminals. Providing TX images simultaneously with BX has proved useful for inspection. Adding dual-energy to the TX images has hitherto been impractical primarily because of size constraints imposed by conventional detectors. Sc-WSF eliminates those constraints and promises to significantly improve performance, since multiple detectors, with distinct energy sensitivities, may be stacked, as shown in
Compact Radiation Detector of Gamma and Neutron Radiation
The Sc-WSF method makes practical a small, lightweight, inexpensive, monitor of neutrons and gamma rays 1601. BaFCl(Eu)-WSF is quite sensitive to gamma radiation while being insensitive to neutrons, while Li6F:ZnS(Ag)-WSF is insensitive to gamma rays and quite sensitive to detecting thermal neutrons.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/163,854 (to Rothschild), entitled “Detector with Active Collimators,” and incorporated herein by reference, describes a backscatter detector module 30 that increases the depth of inspection by distinguishing scatter from the near and far field of inspected objects, as depicted in
A useful addition to a standard backscatter unit would be a “venetian blind” collimator made of scintillator. The slats intercept radiation that does not enter directly through the gaps between the slats so that the box detectors preferentially detect deeper interior objects. The active collimators record the rejected radiation. The light from the active collimators is detected by PMTs, whose collection efficiency decreases rapidly as the gap between collimators decrease. Replacing the PMTs and scintillator vanes with vanes consisting of Sc-WSF detectors solves major shortcomings and makes venetian-blind collimators practical. First, light collection is independent of the gap width between vanes. Second, the active area of the PMTs or silicon photomultipiers used to collect the light from the active collimators is generally much smaller than the active area of needed PMTs, so that the cost of the photo-detectors is less. Third, the placement of the photo-detector at the end of the WSF bundles is not critical to the efficiency of the light collection. Fourth, the signals from the WSFs from each slat can be processed independently, giving considerable scope for maximizing the information about the interior of the inspected object. Fifth, the light from the thin scintillator screens on the front and back of each vane can be collected by independent WSFs, which can significantly improve the depth discrimination.
Detectors for Mini-Backscatter Inspection Systems
The thinness of Sc-WSF detectors provides a unique potential for applications in which low weight and power are drivers. Referring to
The thin profile of Sc-WSF detectors described herein provide for fitting contoured detectors into tight spaces. For example, detectors may be adapted for personnel scanners constrained to fit into constricted airport inspection spaces.
Back-Scatter Inspection of the Underside of Stationary Vehicles
The inspection of the underside of vehicles by a portable x-ray backscattering system presents special problems. The road clearance of cars is not more than 8″ and can be as little as 6″. Fixed inspection systems, such as portals, can place a detector in the ground, or, as described above, can be placed on the ground using Sc-WSF. Mobile under-vehicle inspection systems, however, which are needed for security in many areas, have never been developed. Inspectors rely on passive inspection tools such as mirrors and cameras, which miss contraband in the gas tank or are camouflaged to appear innocuous.
The Sc-WSF detectors make practical an x-ray backscatter system that is not more than 6″ high. A sketch of a practical system is now described with reference to
Mobile Transmission Inspection with L-Shaped Detector Array Segments
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a mobile inspection system, designated generally by numeral 240, is now described with reference to
Each of the horizontal and upright segments 246 and 247 of L-shaped detector unit 245 may be comprised of multiple parallel layers 249, providing for dual- or, more generally, multiple-, energy resolution of detected x-rays, so as to provide material identification, as described above with reference to
Where examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives of x-ray detection. Additionally, single device features may fulfill the requirements of separately recited elements of a claim. The embodiments of the invention described herein are intended to be merely exemplary; variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in any appended claims.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 13/758,189, filed Feb. 4, 2013 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,658,343, and, through that application, claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 61/598,521, and 61/598,576, both filed Feb. 14, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/607,066, filed Mar. 6, 2012. All of the aforesaid applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4045672 | Watanabe | Aug 1977 | A |
4242583 | Annis | Dec 1980 | A |
4259582 | Albert | Mar 1981 | A |
4788436 | Koechner | Nov 1988 | A |
5281820 | Groh | Jan 1994 | A |
5302817 | Yokota | Apr 1994 | A |
5420959 | Walker | May 1995 | A |
5550380 | Sugawara | Aug 1996 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5784507 | Holm-Kennedy | Jul 1998 | A |
5968425 | Bross | Oct 1999 | A |
6078052 | Difilippo | Jun 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252929 | Swift | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6320933 | Grodzins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333502 | Sumita | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6424695 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453007 | Adams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542580 | Carver | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6621888 | Grodzins | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658087 | Chalmers | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6859607 | Sugihara | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6965662 | Eppler | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7067079 | Bross | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7099434 | Adams | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115875 | Worstell | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7218704 | Adams | May 2007 | B1 |
7326933 | Katagiri | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7366282 | Peschmann | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7400701 | Cason | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7417440 | Peschmann | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7505556 | Chalmers | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505562 | Dinca | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7551715 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551718 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555099 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579845 | Peschmann | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593506 | Cason | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7783005 | Kaval | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7856081 | Peschmann | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7924979 | Rothschild | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7995707 | Rothschild | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8054938 | Kaval | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8138770 | Peschmann | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8194822 | Rothschild | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275091 | Morton | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275092 | Zhang | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8325871 | Grodzins | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8345819 | Mastronardi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8389942 | Morton | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428217 | Peschmann | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433036 | Morton | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442186 | Rothschild | May 2013 | B2 |
8503605 | Morton | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8582720 | Morton | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8668386 | Morton | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8731137 | Arroyo | May 2014 | B2 |
8735833 | Morto | May 2014 | B2 |
8750452 | Kaval | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8750454 | Gozani | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8774357 | Morton | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8824632 | Mastronardi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831176 | Morto | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842808 | Rothschild | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8903045 | Schubert | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8903046 | Morton | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908831 | Bendahan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8929509 | Morton | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8993970 | Morton | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9042511 | Peschmann | May 2015 | B2 |
9052403 | Morton | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057679 | Morton | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9069101 | Arroyo, Jr. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9121958 | Morton | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9128198 | Morton | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9146201 | Schubert | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9207195 | Gozani | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9223050 | Kaval | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9268058 | Peschmann | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9285488 | Arodzero | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9417060 | Schubert | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9465135 | Morton | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9535019 | Rothschild | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9562866 | Morton | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9632205 | Morton | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9658343 | Arodzero | May 2017 | B2 |
9791590 | Morton | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9823201 | Morton | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9841386 | Grodzins | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20020082492 | Grzeszczuk | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040104347 | Bross | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040140431 | Schmand | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050018814 | Kerschner | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050078793 | Ikeda | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050236577 | Katagiri | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060251211 | Grodzins | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070029493 | Kniss | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090230925 | Nathan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257555 | Chalmers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274270 | Kotowski | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100072398 | Fruehauf | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100108859 | Andressen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100276602 | Clothier | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110079726 | Kusner | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110490 | Samant | May 2011 | A1 |
20110215222 | Eminoglu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110309253 | Rothschild | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309257 | Menge | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120033791 | Mastronardi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061575 | Dunleavy | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120104265 | Workman | May 2012 | A1 |
20120148020 | Arroyo, Jr. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120280132 | Nakamura | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140105367 | Horvarth | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150168589 | Morton | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160025888 | Peschmann | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025889 | Morton | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160170077 | Morton | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160223706 | Franco | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170059739 | Mastronardi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170299526 | Morton | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170299764 | Morton | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170315242 | Arodzero | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180128935 | Morton | May 2018 | A1 |
20180252841 | Grodzins | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0813692 | Dec 1997 | EP |
2482024 | Jan 2012 | GB |
2005103759 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006111323 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2010129926 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011163108 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2018064434 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP13749372.2, dated Jun. 30, 2016. |
Examination Report for EP13749372.2, dated Apr. 25, 2017. |
Williams et al.:“PET Detector Using Waveshifting Optical Fibers and Microchannel Plate PMT with Delay Line Readout”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 45, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1998 (Apr. 1, 1998), pp. 195-205, XP011087844, ISSN: 0018-9499, DOI: 10.1109/23.664171. |
Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,894. |
European Patent Office, Supplementary Partial European Search Report—Application No. 13749372.2, dated Jun. 30, 2016, 9 pages. |
Beznosko et al., “FNAL-NICADD Extruded Scintillator,” FERMILAB-CONF-04-216-E, pp. 1-4 (Sep. 2004). |
Case et al., “Wavelength-shifting fiber readout of LaC1.sub.3and LaBr.sub.3scintillators,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5898, UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XIV, pp. 58980K-1-58980K-8 (2005). |
Gundiah, “Scintillation properties of Eu.sup.2+-activated barium fluoroiodide,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, pp. 1-10 (Feb. 2011). |
Hutchinson et al., “Optical Readout for Imaging Neutron Scintillation Detectors,” Engineering Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 6 pages. (Nov. 2002). |
Keizer, “The optimal cosmic ray detector for High-Schools,” 21 pages (2011). |
Maekawa et al., “Thin Beta-ray Detectors using Plastic Scintillator Combined with Wavelength-shifting Fibers for Surface Contamination Monitoring,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 886-894 (Dec. 1998). |
Moiseev et al., “High-efficiency plastic scintillator detector with wavelength-shifting fiber readout for the GLAST Large Area Telescope,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 583, pp. 372-381 (2007). |
Nishikido et al. “X-ray detector made of plastic scintillators and WLS fiber for real-time dose distribution monitoring in interventional radiology,” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record. |
Pla-Dalmau et al., “Extruded Plastic Scintillator for MINERvA,” FERMILAB-CONF-05-506-E, pp. 1298-1300 (2005). |
Yoshimura et al., “Plastic scintillator produced by the injection-molding technique,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 406, pp. 435-441 (1998). |
Jae Yul Ahn, Authorized officer Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report—Application No. PCT/US2013/024585, dated Jun. 2, 2013, along with Written Opinion of the International Searchi. |
International Search Report for PCT/US17/54211, dated Jan. 18, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170315242 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61607066 | Mar 2012 | US | |
61598521 | Feb 2012 | US | |
61598576 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13758189 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 15050894 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15050894 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15490787 | US |