Hand planes have been used for hundreds of years to smooth the surface of wood. A hand plane works when a woodworker pushes or pulls the plane across the surface of the wood which allows the sharp blade or iron to shear off a thin layer of wood, thereby smoothing the wood surface.
In order for the iron 28 to be of use, it must be sharpened. The sharpened area on an iron 28 is called the bevel 29. Most prior art hand planes are designed in one of two ways. They either have the iron bevel up or bevel down in relation to the sole 14 of the plane. Typically planes that have a down bevel are similar to the design shown in the hand plane assembly 10. On the other hand, common bevel up irons are used in a different style of hand plane (not shown) which do not have the frog. Instead, the iron 28 lays on an inclined surface on the inside of the base 12 without the aid of the frog 20. This allows a bevel up iron 28 to lie at a much more reclined angle inside the base 12 of the plane, for use on wood with more difficult grain.
A cap iron 30 is used in conjunction with the iron 28 on bevel down type planes. The cap iron 30 is secured to the iron 28 by the use of a cap iron screw 36. This cap iron 30 acts has a lower chip breaker 38 which helps to curl the wood shavings cut by the iron 28 before they have a chance to split or tear away from the larger working piece of wood being planed. Overall, the chip breaker 38 contributes for much smoother cutting on the work surface of the wood. The iron 28 and the cap iron 30 when bolted together by the use of the cap iron screw 36 become one piece, which is held onto the frog 20 by the use of the lever cap 32. This lever cap has a lever 34 with a cam on the end which applies pressure against the cap iron 30 to hold the cap iron 30 and the iron 28 assembly in place on top of the frog 20. The cam on the bottom of the lever 34 causes the lever cap 32 to pivot around the fulcrum stud 26 and remain tight on the cap iron 30 and iron 28 assembly.
One of the primary problems with the conventional metal plane 10 is the ergonomics of the user's handgrip on the tote 18. The rearward angle and extension of the iron 28 into close proximity with the tote 18 interferes with the handgrip, particularly for people with large hands. Also, the large, cutting iron is difficult to grind and hone. The thin iron 28 is also subject to flex, because of the hollow ground bevel 29 and due to bedding of the iron 28 to the frog 20. Also, on smooth planes such as shown in
Another problem with this type prior art plane is that the pressure from the lever cap 32 or the clamping lever assembly 40 is applied to the cap iron behind the cutting edge of the iron 28. This allows the cutting edge of the iron 28 to vibrate and contributes to rough cuts. This creates opportunities for vibration and flex of the iron 28. This leads to chatter in thin cuts as the iron 28 loads and depends on the user to maintain a rigorous and forceful motion to keep the iron loaded during use. Every cutting edge, whether in wood or metal, needs a load (or bite) to work properly. With hand planes, the load occurs when the cutting edge first encounters the material to be cut. The edge of the blade or iron 28 deflects slightly and as long as there is significant forward motion of the plane, the iron 28 remains loaded and cuts the material.
The wooden plane 40 also has problems due to the construction and arrangement of the throat 46 and iron 50. The typical 45°-50° angle of the iron 50 and the corresponding vertical or reverse angle of the throat 46 causes wear at the mouth of the throat, as the sole 44 wears away during use or is made true again, thereby progressively increasing the width of the throat opening. Also, the iron 50 must bed against the inclined throat opening cut into the wood block base 42. Since the wood is subject to warping, the iron may not seat properly. While the large iron 50 and the cap iron 52 provide rigidity, these elements are difficult to remove or adjust. Typically, the iron is hit with the hammer for both depth and lateral adjustment, which is far from accurate. Backing out or loosening of the iron 50 is normally accomplished by wrapping the base 42 either at the rear or on the top surface towards the front of the stock, which presents difficulties. Furthermore, due to the large size of the iron 50 and its 45°-50° angle, the top of iron 50 projects upwardly through the base stock 42 and interferes with the normal hand grip position on the tote 48. Some smooth planes dispense with the rear tote 48 or are configured as a horn plane smoother, as is common in European wooden planes. Most wooden planes 40 also use either a thick tapered iron 50 or a relatively thick straight iron. When the iron 50 is ground at a 25° angle for the bevel, the length of the ground bevel is relatively long. Therefore, the point from where the iron is bedded against the wood body at the heel of the iron, and actual cutting edge, is relatively long, thereby subjecting the cutting edge to flex and chatter when encountering obstinate grain. This problem is exacerbated when the bevel is hollow ground on small radius grinding wheels, as is common.
Accordingly, a primary objective of the present invention is the provision of an improved hand plane for planing wood.
Another objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having a reverse angle frog.
A further objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having interchangeable frogs.
A further objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having a first frog for smooth planing and a second frog for scraper planing.
Still another objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane that functions as a chip breaker without having a separate chip breaking component.
Another objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having cutting blades that are disposable or resharpenable.
Yet another objective of the present invention is the provision of an improved hand plane having a single means for both depth and lateral adjustment of the cutting blade.
A further objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having a frog which is moveable fore and aft without the use of tools.
Yet another objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having a solidly seated blade.
Still another objective of the present invention is the provision of a hand plane having a throat with a mouth that does not widen as the sole is worn down or trued.
A further objective of the present invention is the provision of an improved hand plane having a rear tote which can be gripped without interference.
Another objective of the present invention is the provision of an improved hand plane which is economical to manufacture, yet durable and effective in use.
These and other objectives will become apparent from the following description of the invention.
The hand plane of the present invention includes a base with a sole and a throat, and opposite front and rear ends. A rear handle is provided on the base adjacent the rear end, and a front knob is provided on the base adjacent the forward end. A reverse angle frog is mounted in the base and extends upwardly and forwardly from the throat. A blade is mounted on the frog for planing wood. The blade may be a cutting blade or a scraping blade. Interchangeable frogs are provided for varying angle of attack, and for changing from a smoothing frog to a scraping frog. The reverse angle of the frog avoids interference for a person's hand gripping the rear tote. The blades may be disposable or resharpenable. On the smoothing frog, the blade is sandwiched between the frog and a backup iron. A pair of screws provides for both depth and lateral adjustment of the blade.
One embodiment of the improved hand plane of the present invention is shown in
A frog 70 is mounted in the throat 66 in a reverse angle, as compared to the prior art frog 20 shown in
The frog 70 is mounted in the throat 66 by a lock bolt 78 extending through the base 62, as best seen in
A pair of threaded shafts 86 have a lower end with a dowel or head 88 received in keyed openings 90 in the frog 70, and an upper end extending upwardly through the base 62 with a knurled adjusting nut 92 which can be turned to adjust the depth and lateral position of the blade 72 relative to the mouth 67 of the throat 66. A metal plate 94 is provided on the upper surface of the base 62 beneath the knurled nuts 92, with a snap ring residing below the metal plate 94 on each of the shafts 86. Because the two adjusting screws or shafts 86 operate independently at the outer sides of the frog 70, adjustment of the depth of the blade 72 also adjusts the lateral position of the blade, thereby eliminating any separate lateral adjustment component. Thus, the positioning of the blade is a quick and precise process. The throat adjusting screws 84 can be turned by a user's finger and thumb, without the use of a tool, such as a screwdriver, as in the prior art. Turning of the screws 84 allows the frog 70 to be moved forwardly and rearwardly at the bottom so as to open and close the mouth 67 of the throat 66. Under normal planing conditions, the lock bolt 78 holds the frog 70 in position within the throat, but is not so tight as to preclude depth and lateral adjustment by the adjusting screws 86.
As seen in
In use, the depth and lateral position of the blade 72 of the hand plane 60 is adjusted by the knurled nuts 92, which move the frog 70 upwardly and downwardly within the throat 66. The reverse angle of the frog 70 causes the frog to act as chip breaker for the blade or iron 72 as the blade cuts shavings from the wood being smoothed. The curved or concave front face 98 of the frog 70 directs the shavings up and out of the throat 66. The bottom surface 100 of the frog 70 is ground at an angle that will place the blade 72 at the desired angle for the primary work of the plane 60. This angle may be from 20°-60° in relation to the sole 64 of the plane 60. The frog 70 may be seated 95°-120° in relation of the sole 64. Because of the reverse angle of the frog 70, and a corresponding angle at the front of the mouth 67, when the sole 64 wears or is reduced by truing, the mouth 67 will stay constant for the life of the sole 64. The reverse angle of the frog 70 also provides the benefit of allowing the rear handle or tote 68 to be gripped in a more ergonomically proper manner, without interference from the frog 70 or the blade 72.
The blade 72 is disposable or resharpenable. The rigid backup iron 74 prevents flexing of the blade 72. The backup iron 74 is ground so as to have a minimum clearance angle and therefore maximum support for the thin blade 72. The bevel 73 of the blade 72 is very short due to the thin profile of the blade, and therefore the cantilever of the unsupported portion of the blade 72 is very short. The assembly of the frog 70, the blade 72, and the backup iron 74 provides for rigidity for the blade 72, thereby reducing chatter and flex so that the plane 60 will more easily cut obstinate grain with reduced tear-out.
The screws 76 which mount the blade 72 and backup iron 74 to the frog 70, are accessible through the mouth 67 in the sole 64 of the plane 60. In order to change or sharpen the blade 72, the frog 70 need only be lowered a small amount through the sole 64, and the screws 76, such that the blade 72 can be removed via the slots 102, as best shown in
The assembly of the frog 70, blade 72, and backup iron 74 may be replaced with a second assembly, shown in
It is further understood that the first frog assembly 70, 72, 74 can be interchanged with yet another frog assembly having a different angle of attack. For example, one frog assembly may have an angle of attack of 40°-50°, while another frog assembly may have an angle of attack of 55°-60° to accommodate wild grain.
The invention has been shown and described above with the preferred embodiments, and it is understood that many modifications, substitutions, and additions may be made which are within the intended spirit and scope of the invention. From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention accomplishes at least all of its stated objectives.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
453524 | Tuoti | Jun 1891 | A |
1149703 | Vaughan | Aug 1915 | A |
1157594 | Selleck | Oct 1915 | A |
1417857 | Pfeiffer | May 1922 | A |
1507722 | Ahlen | Sep 1924 | A |
1559797 | Slomer | Nov 1925 | A |
1776661 | McCue | Sep 1930 | A |
3028892 | Filia | Apr 1962 | A |
4015649 | Gilbert | Apr 1977 | A |
4589209 | Zarges | May 1986 | A |
5694696 | Lee et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
7444750 | Saunders | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20040074098 | Schwarz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050060897 | Saunders | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050188553 | Lee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080052924 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |