For centuries, dry sanding tools have been developed and used to smooth and finish surfaces such as plaster, clay, metal, drywall and wood. Coated abrasives such as sandpaper date to at least as early as 13th-Century China. An undesirable consequence of dry sanding is the creation of dust that is both messy and potentially dangerous to inhale.
One method of reducing sanding dust is “wet sanding.” In wet sanding, the sanding implement (e.g., sanding sponge or sandpaper) and/or the surface being sanded is made wet or damp with water or a liquid solution. However, wet sanding is generally more time consuming, presents its own inconveniences and hazards, and is inappropriate for some situations and surfaces.
Accordingly, a need exists for sanding apparatus that facilitate the convenient removal and centralized collection of dust created during dry sanding.
In an illustrative embodiment, a hand sander configured for selective attachment to a dust-collection system includes a housing having at least one wall defining a housing interior surface, a sponge cavity and a recessed sponge seat configured for removably receiving and retaining a determinately-dimensioned sanding sponge. The sanding sponge has an abrasive sanding surface, a back surface opposite the sanding surface and at least one side surface extending between the sanding and back surfaces and defining a sponge periphery. The housing further defines a fluid port through which a fluid can pass from the sponge cavity to the exterior of the housing and a sponge opening through which the sanding sponge is alternatively introduced into and removed from the sponge cavity.
In each of various versions, the sponge seat is defined by a plurality of sponge-seating protrusions that depend from the housing-interior surface and extend into the sponge cavity. The protrusions are configured to contactably engage and support at least one of the sponge periphery and the back surface of the sanding sponge such that, when the sponge is retained within the sponge cavity, (i) the abrasive sanding surface can engage a work surface to be sanded, (ii) spaces are maintained between the sanding sponge and the housing-interior surface and (iii) the spaces are in fluid communication with the fluid port. The spaces act as fluid-flow channels such that application of negative pressure (e.g., suction from a vacuum system) through the fluid port draws sanding dust created by engagement of the sanding surface with the work surface into the fluid-flow channels and out of the housing through the fluid port.
Although the particular predetermined geometry of the sanding sponge is not of any particular importance, the sponge cavity and sponge-seating protrusions of various alternative embodiments are configured for receiving and retaining sanding sponges of at least one of rectangular, triangular, circular and elliptical periphery. Included within these illustrative shapes, are sponges having peripheries that are generally or substantially one of these shapes, even if they do not meet a strict geometrical definition as rectangular, triangular, circular or elliptical. For example, a sponge that has rounded corners, but otherwise suggests a rectangle or triangle is within the scope of “rectangular” or “triangular” as defined in this description and the claims appended hereto. Moreover, as is already understood as a matter of mathematical fact, a square is a special case of a rectangular and is therefore within the meaning of rectangle.
Additionally envisioned within the scope of the invention as defined in the claims are embodiments configured for accepting conventionally sized and configured sanding sponges that are already widely available. Such embodiments require no specialized sponge shape, such as, by way of example, sponges with undulated peripheries that serve to define fluid-flow spaces between the sponge and housing-interior surface. More specifically, various such embodiments accommodate sponges having peripheries defined by planar or “smoothly curved” side surfaces.
The manner of retaining sponges within the sponge cavity might also vary among embodiments, but as with sponge geometry, sponge-retention mechanisms are not central to the overall inventive aspects. In various versions, a sponge is retained by its being slightly compressed to fit within the sponge cavity. In such instances, friction between the sponge periphery and the peripherally-disposed protrusions extending into the sponge cavity retains a sponge. In alternative embodiments, selectively releasable mechanisms such as adhesive, hook-and-loop fasteners or magnetism might be employed, by way of non-limiting example.
Representative embodiments are more completely described and depicted in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
The following description of variously embodied hand sanders is demonstrative in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or its application of uses. Accordingly, the various implementations, aspects, versions and embodiments described in the summary and detailed description are in the nature of non-limiting examples falling within the scope of the appended claims and do not serve to define the maximum scope of the claims.
Referring initially to
As shown most clearly in
With continued reference to
Referring still to
The foregoing is considered to be illustrative of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since modifications and changes to various aspects and implementations will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, it is to be understood that the foregoing does not limit the invention as expressed in the appended claims to the exact construction, implementations and versions shown and described.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
143477 | Nov 2011 | CA | national |
144980 | Mar 2012 | CA | national |
Priority based on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/671,071 filed Jul. 12, 2012, and entitled “SPONGE SANDER THAT IS SELECTIVELY ATTACHABLE TO A DUST-VACUUM SYSTEM” is claimed. Additionally, the present Application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/422,217 filed May 17, 2012 under the title “HAND SANDER.” U.S. Design application Ser. No. 29/422,217 in turn claimed foreign priority benefits in Canadian Industrial Design Application No. 143477 filed Nov. 30, 2011 under the title “DUST FREE HAND SANDER” and Canadian Industrial Design Application No. 144980 filed Mar. 21, 2012 under the title “HAND SANDER.” The present application accordingly claims priority in the aforesaid Canadian applications through U.S. Design Application No. 29/422,217.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3256648 | Subonovich | Jun 1966 | A |
3826045 | Champayne | Jul 1974 | A |
3862521 | Isaksson | Jan 1975 | A |
4071981 | Champayne | Feb 1978 | A |
4135334 | Rudiger | Jan 1979 | A |
4598500 | Faraudo | Jul 1986 | A |
4680895 | Roestenberg | Jul 1987 | A |
4697389 | Romine | Oct 1987 | A |
4937984 | Taranto | Jul 1990 | A |
D344003 | Milkie | Feb 1994 | S |
5470272 | Kikuchi | Nov 1995 | A |
5540616 | Thayer | Jul 1996 | A |
6988940 | Taylor | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7033259 | Seasholtz | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7364500 | Brown | Apr 2008 | B2 |
8684792 | Rocha | Apr 2014 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130309948 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61671071 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29422217 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13866318 | US |