The present disclosure relates generally to the field of personal restraint and securing of individuals, and more specifically to handcuffs used in various scenarios, such as law enforcement, military, corrections or private security, wherein enhanced features make removing the handcuffs more difficult for the restrained individual.
Handcuffs have been used for centuries to restrain individuals in various scenarios, including but not limited to prison or correctional facility situations. Use and construction of handcuffs and similar restraints are well known, and handcuffs are generally accepted as an effective restraint system for use by law enforcement, military personnel, security officers and various other entities worldwide. Handcuffs are a standard issued item of police equipment utilized by every major law enforcement agency in the world, and handcuffs and/or related restraints are currently in use by police officers, corrections officers, private security officers, military personnel, and so forth. The same may be said for other restraining devices, including but not limited to handcuffs, leg chains, waist chains, finger cuffs, and any manner of mechanisms used to restrain a person's wrists, hands, arms, ankles, legs, feet, or any or other body part. As used herein, all these restraining devices will be generally referred to as “handcuffs” and the teachings herein may apply to other restraining devices while illustrated for use in, for example, restraining an individual by his or her wrists.
Handcuffs have for decades employed a standard ratchet teeth type locking system wherein a standard universal handcuff key is needed to unlock them. The basic design of handcuffs has been virtually unchanged for more than a century. Handcuffs are a critical piece of law enforcement equipment and very few viable alternatives to standard handcuffs exist. Although many manufacturers have attempted to create a more secure handcuff, these have largely been commercially unsuccessful and thus the same traditional handcuff style used decades ago is still in use today.
The standard handcuff in use by law enforcement today utilizes a bracelet type design placed around a wrist and secured via a ratchet which is then locked into place. The teeth of the ratchet engage the teeth of the spring-loaded pawl located inside the bracelet and when the pawl is forced against the ratchet, the two sets of teeth are locked together. To release the handcuffs, the pawl must be disengaged from the ratchet teeth, which is accomplished with the use of a universal handcuff key. The handcuff key is rotated to disengage the primary lock. The design of the ratchet teeth and pawl allows for free movement of a piece called a strand when tightening the handcuffs, but prevents the single strand from loosening unless the pawl is depressed so that it may no longer engage the ratchet teeth.
Each wrist of the wearer is secured with an individual handcuff connected to another handcuff via a small chain, hinge, solid locking component, or other method. This assembly is commonly referred to as a set of handcuffs, a pair of handcuffs, “handcuffs” or any other derivative phrase indicating two or more handcuff portions secured together to form a unit capable of securing two or more appendages of a wearer.
A universal handcuff key is used to manipulate a double lock bar mechanism, which moves laterally under the pawl. The double lock bar can be set to prevent the pawl from being depressed thereby locking the single strand into place. Handcuffs with double lock bars have a detent, which when engaged, stops the cuff from ratcheting tighter and prevents the wearer from over-tightening the cuffs. Tightening the handcuff ratchets could be intentional or may occur unintentionally when pressure is applied to the single strand ratchet. As a result, handcuffs may cause nerve damage or loss of circulation in a wearer's hands due to over-tightening. Additionally, some wearers may tighten the handcuffs in order to attempt an escape by utilizing lock picking tools or have an officer loosen the handcuffs where the wearer subsequently attempts to escape while the handcuffs are loosened. Double locking the handcuffs make picking handcuff locks more difficult.
These traditional and current handcuff designs are extremely susceptible to countermeasures and escape attempts such as lock picking. Lock picking is the practice of unlocking a lock by manipulating various components of the locking device without the use of the original key. For purposes of this document, the term “lock picking” will broadly be used to describe various countermeasures utilized in an attempt to defeat the security capabilities of handcuffs or related restraints.
Handcuffs may be opened in four general ways: utilizing a handcuff key or lock pick, slipping the hands out of the handcuffs when the hands are smaller than the ratchet openings, releasing the pawl with a shim, or breaking the handcuff chain commonly known as “handcuff breaking.”
A significant issue with commercial handcuffs today is the ability to unlock the cuffs using a single commonly available universal handcuff key. The universal handcuff key is simple in its design and encompasses a shaft, a bow which is used to grip the key, a single bit which engages the pawl of the handcuffs to release the single strand and a peg used to engage the double locking mechanism. Due to the simple design of the key and corresponding locking mechanism inside the common handcuff, significant vulnerabilities exist in the design.
Many law enforcement officers utilize handcuffs designed for use with a universal handcuff key due to needs for operational and field expediency. Handcuffs are often placed on suspects and physical custody of the individual(s) is transferred to other law enforcement personnel. The need to have a common key is important to ensure efficiency when cuffing, uncuffing or transporting a prisoner whether it is in a patrol environment, the courts, a jail system, prisons or any other setting. Further, emergency situations can sometimes arise when releasing the individual is required for the individual's safety, and an unusual or remote key could potentially result in harm to the individual.
Due to this commonality of the universal handcuff key design, suspects and other non-law enforcement related personnel sometimes carry handcuff keys on their person in anticipation of defeating handcuff locking mechanisms. Variations of the universal handcuff key are often hidden and kept by criminals and inmates on their person with the intent to escape and/or assault someone. Handcuff keys have been known to be built into devices and/or attached to designs to be worn on a person's clothing or body wherein they are not readily recognized as a handcuff key. These surreptitious handcuff keys can then be quickly deployed and utilized to escape or attack an officer or other individual nearby.
Additionally, a simple pin or piece of metal (or similar object) can be utilized to pick the primary handcuff locking mechanism, or a shim can be forced between the single strand ratchet teeth and the pawl, thereby releasing the handcuffs. Books and instructional videos are readily available demonstrating various ways to open handcuffs—even by the wearer. These methods for picking standard handcuffs can be learned and completed with the use of a single hand by individuals even while handcuffed with their hands behind their backs.
Lock breaking refers to a method whereby the handcuffs are twisted in such a manner as to cause undue torsion on the small chain connecting the two handcuff assemblies. Additional tension is then exerted with force by the wearer so that the chain breaks thereby freeing a suspect's hands. Such a vulnerability is also undesirable.
There is a need for enhanced security handcuffs which provides substantially greater security and an inability for them to be opened by the wearer. Security handcuffs should be simple to operate, should preferably have a generally similar form factor as current designs, and still utilize a universal handcuff key. Handcuffs should be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to open by the wearer of the handcuffs even if they are in possession of the handcuff key or other lock picking device. Handcuffs should nevertheless be capable of easily being unlocked by an officer, utilizing a universal handcuff key, while at the same time avoiding the design limitations and vulnerabilities associated with earlier designs.
According to one embodiment, there is provided a handcuff comprising a strand, a universal handcuff key locking mechanism configured to receive a universal handcuff key, a first engageable selection mechanism located on a first side of the handcuff, and a second engageable selection mechanism positioned on a second side of the handcuff opposite the first side. Unlocking the handcuff requires actuating the first engageable selection mechanism concurrently with actuating the second engageable selection mechanism while simultaneously employing the universal handcuff key, thereby releasing the strand.
According to a second embodiment, there is provided a restraining device comprising a strand configured to tighten and loosen about a wearer, a universal key locking mechanism configured to receive a universal key, a first engageable selection mechanism located on a first side of the restraining device, and a second engageable selection mechanism positioned on a second side of the restraining device opposite the first side. Unlocking the restraining device from the wearer requires actuating the first engageable selection mechanism and the second engageable selection mechanism while simultaneously employing the universal handcuff key, thereby releasing the strand.
According to a third embodiment, there is provided a handcuff comprising a strand, a universal key locking mechanism configured to receive a universal key, a first engageable selection mechanism located on a first side of the handcuff, and a second engageable selection mechanism positioned on a second side of the handcuff opposite the first side. Unlocking the handcuff from the wearer requires actuating the first engageable selection mechanism and the second engageable selection mechanism while simultaneously employing the universal handcuff key, thereby releasing the strand.
Various aspects and features of the disclosure are described in further detail below.
The present design is related to enhanced security handcuffs requiring more than a single handed manipulation to open the handcuffs while using a standard handcuff key. In certain instances two or even three hands are required to open the cuffs, typically including one hand that turns a standard handcuff key and at least one other hand that releases mechanical components on the handcuffs. Multiple and simultaneous processes may be necessary to unlock the handcuffs according to the current design.
Millions of people are arrested or detained by law enforcement agencies and related entities each year and are subsequently handcuffed in order to restrain their limbs to prevent escape and/or attack. The use of handcuffs is accepted as an effective restraint system and they are used by every major law enforcement agency in the world. The standard handcuff ratcheting design utilizing a universal handcuff key has been virtually unchanged for more than 100 years and is still in use around the world today. Handcuffs are a critical piece of law enforcement equipment and very few effective alternatives to standard handcuffs exist. Most law enforcement agencies purchase and utilize handcuffs which are similar in design and capability regardless of the manufacturer.
Law enforcement officers are typically trained in one-handed techniques to place handcuffs on a suspect's wrists and a two-handed operation to uncuff a suspect. A standard key is used for almost all handcuffs and is universal in that the same key can be used to open almost all sets of handcuffs regardless of manufacturer. Because handcuff keys are universal and millions exist, they are readily accessible to suspects and inmates restrained by handcuffs, creating a tremendous liability to law enforcement officers. This condition is exemplified in the event those under arrest or being detained are able to obtain or conceal a handcuff key and uncuff themselves. This danger extends to members of the public, and in some cases, prison inmates. A simple design enhancement can make standard handcuffs substantially more effective in their capability to restrain a wearer even if the wearer is in possession of a handcuff key, and such an improvement is the subject of the present design.
The enhanced security handcuffs according to the present design address a need for a more secure, “unpickable” handcuff. Over the years, manufacturers have attempted to improve upon the traditional handcuff design, typically seeking to create a more advanced key and corresponding locking mechanism. This route, however, has been largely unsuccessful. Rather than creating an improved key design, the Enhanced Security Handcuff concept requires a dual operation to simultaneously manipulate an enhanced locking mechanism while turning the universal handcuff key. This unique combination of locking mechanisms and process(es) adds increased security to the traditional design.
Although many of the variations herein discuss the use of a standard universal handcuff key, it should be noted the designs incorporated herein also apply to handcuffs and restraints employing specialized, propriety and high security keys and locking mechanisms. Such specialized locking mechanisms may also be utilized to employ the designs described herein.
The present design allows for handcuffs to be applied to a suspect with the use of only one hand; however, one aspect of the present design requires simultaneously employing two hands with opposable digits to unlock or open the handcuffs, often while additionally manipulating a handcuff key. This requirement makes it extremely unlikely for an individual who is wearing the handcuffs to unlock and/or open them. This is largely because the wearer of the handcuff has one hand locked in a position where it cannot be used to manipulate that handcuff in any way. As a result, this design, requiring that two free hands act separately and simultaneously to unlock the handcuffs, makes it extremely unlikely an individual will be able to unlock the handcuffs even if he or she is in possession of a handcuff key, shim, or other lock picking device.
This disclosure provides numerous disparate designs which increase the security level of the handcuffs and make it extremely difficult for a wearer to remove the restraints even if he or she is in possession of a handcuff key. These different designs can be incorporated into handcuffs as a single enhancement or, in certain instances, multiple design concepts can be combined together to increase security of the handcuffs even further. A handcuff design according to the present teachings can incorporate any combination of features and capabilities discussed herein in a set of handcuffs or in any other similar restraint systems.
As used herein, various terms are employed and are intended to be used in the broadest sense possible. For example, the present application uses the term “officer” or “law enforcement officer” or otherwise to indicate the individual employing the handcuffs or similar restraints, and as such the term is meant to broadly encompass any individual who may have use for such a device or system, including but not limited to police officers, military personnel, corrections officers, security personnel, or other interested individuals.
Additionally, the design of the handcuffs may differ from the exact configuration(s) described herein. With respect to restraints, the term “handcuffs” is intended broadly to mean any type of handcuffs, thumb cuffs, waist chains, leg irons and/or any other type of restraint designed to restrain a person's body part(s) to include but not limited to his or her hands, wrists, fingers, arms, legs, ankles, feet, waist, shoulders, neck or any other body part. These are collectively referred to henceforth as “handcuffs”.
Further, certain designs and capabilities are described herein as being a single variation or capability while others are described as having multiple capabilities. It is understood that the invention is not limited solely to the configurations described but single or multiple configurations may be employed in a single restraint or handcuff respectively, as long as the functionality described is fully or in part incorporated. The foregoing and other concepts disclosed herein are intended to be interpreted broadly and not limit the scope of the present invention.
As used herein, the term “wearer” is synonymous with the term “suspect” or “individual” or any other similar term to convey someone to whom the handcuffs have been applied or a person whom the device is intended to restrain.
In the past, handcuff manufacturers have created handcuffs with different designs to enhance security. The predominant method has been to redesign the locking mechanism to use a more complicated and/or different key. Invariably, each system has been unsuccessful without significant acceptance or use. The requirement to utilize a “standard” universal handcuff key is critical from an operational effectiveness perspective. The use of a universal handcuff key enables peace officers, security officers and correctional officers to unlock handcuffs without having to identify which keys belong to which handcuff. Additionally, officers are thereby only required to carry one handcuff key, as opposed to multiple keys belonging to various disparate restraint systems.
Each of the variations described below utilize a traditional handcuff key, which is universally available and standardized. In certain instances, if desired, the handcuffs of the present design may employ specialized and proprietary key and locking systems to increase their effectiveness. Such handcuffs may also incorporate multiple design features discussed herein.
Each variation of the handcuff design herein incorporates the ability of the handcuffs to be “double locked”, similar to a traditional handcuff, as an option to the officer or other law enforcement professional. The “double lock” feature enables the law enforcement officer to set a detent in the double lock bar of the handcuff preventing the single strand from ratcheting further between the double strands and tightening the handcuffs. A suspect wearing handcuffs that have not been double locked may inadvertently tighten the handcuffs leading to pain and discomfort. Worse, a suspect may intentionally attempt to tighten the handcuffs in order to facilitate some means of escape, or to persuade the law enforcement professional to loosen the cuffs or uncuff the suspect, thereby forcing a potential situation posing high risk and potentially high liability.
All drawings, schematics or other visual depictions in these designs encompass a set of handcuffs working in unison to secure one or more appendages of a wearer. In some drawings, only a single unconnected handcuff is depicted. A second handcuff is not depicted in some drawings for clarity and simplicity reasons. Actual designs will normally encompass at least two separate handcuffs connected via one or more of several available methods such as a metal chain, links, roller chain, clasps, hinges, solid bar or any other method. At least one, or in many cases, both of the individual cuffs employ the designs depicted herein.
A first variation of the present design is illustrated in
Also shown in
Each of the outer lock bar pawls, first lock bar button pawl 103 and second lock bar button pawl 105, has a button attached to the center outer portion of the outer bar pawl. First button 115 and second button 116 are shown on first lock bar button pawl 103 and second lock bar button pawl 105, respectively. The buttons may be affixed to the outer bar pawls via any number of methods, including glue, welding, screws, pins, and so forth. In another iteration of the design, the lock bar pawl or pawls, such as lock bar key pawl 104, may be manufactured with a button. In such a case, the pawl with incorporated button may be one solid piece of metal or other material thus providing rigidity and increased strength.
The outer lock bar pawls 103 and 105 in this embodiment incorporate a set of recessed/concaved pull down buttons 115 and 116 that require a two handed manipulation to release the cuffs. In this variation of the design, two button pawls 103 and 105 are added to traditional single key pawl 104, all positioned on a triple tab spring 101, requiring that all three pawls 103, 104, and 105 be disengaged simultaneously from the teeth 110 of the first strand 109 in order to release the handcuff.
A close view of the assembled version of handcuffs 100 is shown in
This two handed operation then further requires that a traditional handcuff key 106 be inserted into the key hole 117 located on the double strand 107 using a different hand and turned, while simultaneously depressing the recessed pull down buttons 115 and 116 with the first hand to disengage the button pawls 103 and 105, thereby disengaging the third of the three pawls, the key pawl 104, from the single strand. Only when all three pawls 103, 104, and 105 are simultaneously disengaged from the ratchet teeth 110 is the single strand bow 109 released and therefore able to open.
Due to the design of triple tab spring 101, constant individual pressure is continuously applied by spring 101, upwards into each of three individual pawls 103, 104, and 105. If at any point, pressure is released from the handcuff key 106 or either of two buttons 115 and 116, each of the pawls individually reengages ratchet teeth 110 thereby relocking the handcuffs and preventing them from being opened.
The requirement for two separate hands to be utilized to simultaneously manipulate the handcuff key 106 and both lock bar button pawls 115 and 116 makes it extremely difficult for the wearer of the handcuffs to free him or herself, even if he or she is in possession of a handcuff key 106. This system increases the security features of the handcuffs, as it requires two separate but simultaneous actions, each requiring hands with opposable digits.
A second variation of the design is presented in
Also shown in
In this embodiment of the design, in order to disengage each side pawls 201 and 202 from teeth 204 of single strand 205, each button 206 and 207 located on either end of mid plate 203 and 214, separately and independently control a single side pawl 201 and 202 and must be pulled down or depressed simultaneously in order to release teeth 201 and 202 of the single side pawl(s) from teeth 204 of the single strand 205. As a depicted in
As shown in
The top of the side pawls 201 and 202, where they engage the ratchet teeth 204, may be provided such that the single strand 205 can only move in one direction, such as tightening, without the use of a handcuff key 217. The handcuffs in such a configuration may only be opened or loosened if the key pawl 209 and the side pawls 201 and 202 are simultaneously disengaged from the single strand 205 teeth 204 as depicted in
This two handed operation, requiring opposable digits on two different hands, makes it extraordinarily difficult if not impossible for the wearer of the handcuffs to open the handcuffs even with the use of a handcuff key. This is largely because one hand of the wearer of the handcuff is incapacitated by the handcuff leaving only one hand to manipulate the locking mechanism of the handcuff.
A third variation of the design is presented in
As depicted in
The keyhole block button 301 includes a plate 305 acting in the capacity of a keyhole cover. The keyhole cover 305 and keyhole block button 301 may be designed as a one-piece design or two pieces bonded together to form a single unit.
This embodiment prevents access to the keyhole 303 located on double strand 302 of the handcuff, requiring that sliding keyhole block button 301 first be pulled in a direction away from the keyhole 303, sliding open the door 305 and providing access to the keyhole 303 as depicted in
This two handed operation, requiring opposable digits on two hands, would make it extremely difficult if not impossible to achieve by the wearer of the handcuff. This is largely because one hand of the wearer of the handcuff is incapacitated by the handcuff leaving only one hand to manipulate the locking mechanism of the handcuff. A fourth embodiment of the design is presented in
From
The top of the button extension arms 410 and 411 interface using a small spring(s) 414 and 415, providing positive pressure inward onto the outer edge of single strand ratchet 401 indentations 404 as depicted in
A common handcuff lock picking technique employs a shim comprised of a thin piece of metal, plastic or other material pushed into rear channel 417 of the handcuffs between ratchet teeth 402 and the key pawl teeth 422. This handcuff countermeasure is extremely effective and can rapidly unlock/open a pair of handcuffs without the use of a handcuff key 416.
Defeating the present design may require the use of three simultaneous shims to open the handcuffs in the manner described above. The three shims would need to be simultaneously used on single strand ratchet teeth 402 and both sides of the single strands at ratchet indentions 404 of the bow 425 to open the handcuffs.
When the two squeeze buttons 406 and 407 are resting (not depressed), they engage with corresponding indentations 404 on the sides of the single strand 401 to prevent movement of the single strand 401 backwards which could loosen the handcuffs. The single strand 401 can still tighten without the use of a handcuff key 416, a capability common with most handcuffs.
As depicted in
The two squeeze buttons 406 and 407 are separately and simultaneously squeezed to disengage from side indent 404 of the single strand 401, while also inserting and rotating a handcuff key 416 in the keyhole 420 to disengage key pawl 403 from bottom teeth 402 of single strand 401 to allow for the release or uncuffing of single strand 401.
This two handed operation, requiring opposable digits on two separate hands, would be difficult if not impossible for the wearer of the handcuff. This is largely because one hand of the wearer of the handcuff is incapacitated by the handcuff leaving only one hand to manipulate the locking mechanism of the handcuff. Additionally, the design of the ratchet indentations 404 on the outer edge of the single strand 401 prevents the use of a single shim to open the handcuff.
In another embodiment of the design, depicted in
As shown in
The swivel collar 507 of chain 506, under pressure from spring 510, forces chain tension lock bar 505 upwards towards pawl 502. The upper portion 512 of chain tension lock bar 505 is connected to key pawl 502 by any type of method to include welded, pinned as shown in arrangement 512, bonded, glued, etc. The pressure exerted by spring 510 into collar swivel 507 is transferred into tension lock bar 505, pushes pawl 502 upwards and engages teeth 504 of single strand 503.
From
In this embodiment two or more pawls may be employed. One pawl 502 connects to swivel collar 507 so that the retraction of handcuff chain 506 from the handcuff double strand 508 and 509 retracts pawl 502 from teeth 504 of single strand 503. This pawl 502 cannot be disengaged from teeth 504 of single strand 503 by use of a universal handcuff key. Also shown in
This embodiment requires the wearer of the handcuffs to pull the two handcuffs apart to create pressure on the secondary chain tension pawl 502 while simultaneously turning a handcuff key to release the single strand 503. This design makes it more difficult for the wearer of the handcuff to release himself or herself from the restraints even with the use of a handcuff key.
Handcuffs are generally constructed with two individual handcuff ratchets connected together via swivel collars and a small metal chain. This system allows the handcuffs to be folded over for transport and quickly deployed. Additionally, the metal chain links provide flexibility and allow movement of the wearer so that he may twist and move his hands even when handcuffed. This flexibility and movement allows for the wearer to be more comfortable, reduces injuries, and allows an officer to handcuff a person more easily as the handcuffs may be turned and twisted as needed.
This flexibility of the existing linked chain design provides a security weakness in the handcuffs. Due to the flexibility of the linked chain, a wearer may twist her hands and wrists in a manner in which he or she can now access the keyholes of the handcuffs he or she is wearing in an attempt to defeat the security mechanism. This flexibility allows the wearer to unlock the handcuffs he or she is wearing using a universal handcuff key or lock-picking device.
Another embodiment of the design is shown in
The roller chain 601 is relatively rugged and linked openings 602 between the chain links 601 may be minimal to prevent the insertion of pry bars or tools. The roller chain 601 may be connected to each of the handcuff ends by a swivel collar 603 or other similar system. The roller chain 601 may be comprised of one or many links to provide greater flexibility and/or space between the two pair of handcuffs or a minimal amount of links in order to reduce the flexibility available to the wearer of the handcuffs.
The swivel 603 connects roller chain 601 to the handcuffs and has the ability to rotate freely and independently from each of the handcuffs in the manner shown in
In this embodiment, collar 604 of swivel 603 sits inside the housing of double strand 605 and 606. The collar 604 of swivel 603 has two opposing flat areas 607. The double lock bar 608 sits directly above swivel collar 604. When the handcuffs are double locked, the double lock bar 608 is moved laterally towards keyhole 614 which prevents pawls 609 from moving downward and effectively prevents single strand 610 from moving in any direction (tightening or loosening).
In this design, double lock bar 608 has two small tabs 611 extending downward into the area occupied by swivel collar 604. When the handcuffs are not double locked, tabs 611 do not interface or interfere with the rotation of collar swivel 604. When double lock bar 608 is moved into the double lock position, tabs 611 move forward and interface against the collar of swivel 604.
When the flat areas 611 of collar swivel 604 are lined up as shown in
Locking swivel collars 603 and 604 into one position produces a condition whereby, the handcuffs can move or twist only in the direction which the roller chain 601 allows. This design would prevent a wearer from being able to twist the handcuffs in multiple positions when attempting to manipulate the locking system of the handcuffs. The locking bar tabs 611 are only able to move against flat surface 607 of swivel collar 603 and 604 when swivel collar component 604 is aligned with the locking block tabs 611 as shown in
This embodiment also provides for a double lock pre-staging position for the tabs 611 as depicted in
This sequence is depicted in
This embodiment allows an officer to place the handcuffs on the wearer in any position with the handcuffs freely spinning and twisting as needed to facilitate the application of the device. Once the wearer is handcuffed, the officer may initiate the double lock mechanism of the handcuffs. If the handcuffs are aligned, this design limits the ability for roller chain 601 to swivel, thereby preventing the wearer from being able to twist his hands in order to access the keyhole 614 of the handcuffs. If the swivel collar 604 and tabs 611 are not aligned, the handcuffs revert to a double lock pre-stage condition. When the wearer turns their hands into a position which aligns the flat areas 607 of swivel collar 604 with tabs 611, the handcuff double lock bar 608 would automatically move and lock into position. This process is automatic as a result of the spring pressure applied by tab spring 612 entering the double lock “V” channel 614. Also shown in
In another embodiment shown in
When in a blocking position, the blocking tab mechanisms 707 and 708 on the key blocking squeeze buttons 701 and 702 prevent full rotation of the handcuff key 712 in keyhole 703, preventing the disengagement of key pawl 709 from teeth 710 of single strand 711. Release requires a user pressing the two key blocking squeeze buttons 701 and 702 simultaneously inwards on spring 706, towards each other, in order to push blocking tab mechanisms 707 and 708 towards the inside walls of double strands 704 and 705 as shown in
Another version of the design, may comprise a double lock with a plunger, i.e. passive inertia inhibitor, as presented in
From
In order for double lock bar 801 to move, plunger 807 and 808 should be depressed or moved downward so that the cylinder of lower plunger 808 moves downward against spring 811. This movement ensures the bottom of the upper plunger 807 and top of the lower plunger 808 are aligned in position where they allow free movement of double lock bar 801.
From
From
The double lock bar 801 may be held in the unlocked “V” notch 818 or double locked “V” notch 804 position by pressure exerted by tab spring 803. Also shown in
A further embodiment of the present design is a double lock with hook or passive momentum inhibitor design. From
As shown in
When the handcuffs are not in the double lock position, hook shaped bar 907 sits along the bottom of double lock bar 901. When double lock bar 901 moves into the double lock bar position, the hook shaped component 907 engages into a notch 911 located in the bottom of double lock bar 901. This design prevents the double lock mechanism from being moved out of the double lock position unless a handcuff key 903 is placed into handcuff keyhole 908 and turned in order to double lock the system. Also shown in
A further embodiment of the present design is shown in
From
All four notches 1007 and 1008 on both sides of double lock bar 1009 are sculpted to allow for double lock bar 1009 to be moved into the double lock position only without the use of buttons 1001 and 1002. Notches 1007 and 1008 are additionally sculpted so that buttons 1001 and 1002 need to be depressed and the handcuff key 1017 used in order to take the handcuffs out of the double locked position.
This design allows the handcuffs to be double locked and prevents inertia from dislodging double lock bar 1009 thereby unlocking the double lock system. Again, striking handcuffs in order to deactivate the double lock system is a lock picking technique commonly used by suspects.
From
A further embodiment of the present design is shown in
Buttons 1101 and 1102 have small extensions with L shape components 1105 and 1106 at the end. Small springs 1107 and 1108 sit underneath L shaped components 1105 and 1106 providing positive pressure upwards into double lock bar 1109. When the handcuffs do not have double lock mechanism 1109 activated, L shaped components 1105 and 1106 sit under double lock bar 1109 in channels 1110 and 1111 with small springs 1107 and 1108 under pressure as shown in
From
A further embodiment of the present design is a sliding keyhole blocking plate embodiment (opposite side of keyhole). Shown in
A further embodiment provides a sliding block system preventing full entry of a handcuff key into a keyhole located on the double strand of a handcuff. From
Sliding keyhole block button 1301 is recessed into double strand 1302 with a concave surface. The concave button surface ensures button 1301 cannot be activated by side pressure on the double strand 1302 unless button 1301 is physically pushed away from keyhole 1303. From
In this embodiment, the sliding keyhole plate button 1301 on double strand 1302 opposite keyhole 1303 makes it difficult for a person to simultaneously slide the keyhole plate button 1301 and manipulate a handcuff key 1304 with the same hand.
From
A further embodiment includes push button locks for a locking bar and is shown in
In order for the double locking system to be unlocked, both buttons 1401 and 1402 must simultaneously be depressed to remove L shaped protrusions 1406 and 1407 from the notches 1409 and 1410. Only then can handcuff key 1411 or a similar device be used to unlock double lock mechanism 1408 of the handcuffs. The need to depress buttons 1401 and 1402 and manipulate a handcuff key 1411 simultaneously makes it extremely unlikely that a person wearing the handcuffs will be able to unlock the double lock 1408 without assistance.
Thus the present design comprises a handcuff or restraining system design which may require more than one hand to manipulate an aspect of the handcuffs while simultaneously turning a handcuff key. Alternately, the design may be one where the wearer of the handcuffs will have an inability to utilize two hands to manipulate the handcuffs in conjunction with the use of a handcuff key, or may incorporate two sliding buttons on opposing sides of double strands connected to two of three pawls. Sliding the buttons down independently unlocks two pawls while a third is unlocked with a handcuff key.
The design may alternately incorporate two sliding buttons on opposing edges of the double strand housing. The buttons engage pawls located at the edge, which interface with the single strand ratchet teeth. Sliding the buttons down independently unlocks the pawls while a central pawl is unlocked with a handcuff key. A further alternative comprises a design where a sliding button plate, under spring tension, blocks the keyhole. The button, located on the same side as the keyhole, can be retracted and a key inserted in the keyhole to unlock the handcuffs.
Thus the present arrangement may include a design where ratchet indentations are located on the side edges of the single strand, side pawls engage the side ratchets, and tension is released when two buttons on the double strands are simultaneously depressed.
Designs presented herein include a design whereby the handcuff swivel collar interfaces with one of multiple pawls where the handcuff chain has to be pulled away from the handcuff to disengage the pawl and key simultaneously used to unlock the handcuffs; a design where a roller chain is used to connect the two handcuffs where the double lock bar has two tabs which interface against the flat areas of a collar swivel thereby prevent the handcuffs from turning when double locked; a design where two buttons on the double strands need to be simultaneously depressed in order to allow a handcuff key to open the locking mechanism; a design where a double plunger system is incorporated into the double lock bar and when the handcuffs are double locked, the plunger prevents inertia strikes from unlocking the double lock bar; a design whereby an L shaped component is incorporated to engage into the double lock bar such that when the handcuffs are double locked, the L shape component prevents inertia strikes from unlocking the double lock bar; a design where two buttons on opposite sides of the double strand interface with the double lock bar when activated, wherein the buttons are depressed to allow the double lock bar to move when the key is turned.
Further embodiments of the present design include two buttons in opposite sides of the double strand interface with the double lock bar when activated where the buttons slide up or down to allow the double lock bar to move when a key is turned; a design where a sliding button plate, under spring tension, blocks the keyhole where the button, located on the opposite side as the keyhole, can be retracted and a key inserted in the keyhole to unlock the handcuffs; and a design where a slide plate moves a block into the keyhole, and the sliding plate needs to be retracted before handcuff key can fully seat into the keyhole in order to unlock the handcuffs.
According to one embodiment, there is provided a handcuff comprising a strand, a universal handcuff key locking mechanism configured to receive a universal handcuff key, a first engageable selection mechanism located on a first side of the handcuff, and a second engageable selection mechanism positioned on a second side of the handcuff opposite the first side. Unlocking the handcuff requires actuating the first engageable selection mechanism concurrently with actuating the second engageable selection mechanism while simultaneously employing the universal handcuff key, thereby releasing the strand.
According to a second embodiment, there is provided a restraining device comprising a strand configured to tighten and loosen about a wearer, a universal key locking mechanism configured to receive a universal key, a first engageable selection mechanism located on a first side of the restraining device, and a second engageable selection mechanism positioned on a second side of the restraining device opposite the first side. Unlocking the restraining device from the wearer requires actuating the first engageable selection mechanism and the second engageable selection mechanism while simultaneously employing the universal handcuff key, thereby releasing the strand.
According to a third embodiment, there is provided a handcuff comprising a strand, a universal key locking mechanism configured to receive a universal key, a first engageable selection mechanism located on a first side of the handcuff, and a second engageable selection mechanism positioned on a second side of the handcuff opposite the first side. Unlocking the handcuff from the wearer requires actuating the first engageable selection mechanism and the second engageable selection mechanism while simultaneously employing the universal handcuff key, thereby releasing the strand.
The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of currently pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/834,501, filed Dec. 7, 2017, entitled “Handcuff Apparatus,” inventor Kresimir Kovac, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/340,830, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,840,856, filed Nov. 1, 2016, entitled “Handcuff Apparatus,” inventor Kresimir Kovac, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/919,200, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,551,170, filed Oct. 15, 2015, entitled “Handcuff Apparatus,” inventor Kresimir Kovac, the entirety of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15834501 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16423024 | US | |
Parent | 15340830 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 15834501 | US | |
Parent | 14919200 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15340830 | US |