The current invention relates to automated computer-controlled methods to identify skin texture and to selectively and precisely apply one or more reflectance modifying agent, such as a dye or pigment, to human skin to improve its visual attractiveness.
Prior art techniques for modifying the appearance of skin include natural tanning, artificial tanning, and the deliberate application of cosmetics. Each of these prior art techniques has limitations.
Typically, the applications of cosmetic substances to skin are largely manual, for example through the use of brushes, application tubes, pencils, pads, and fingers. The application methods make prior art cosmetics imprecise, labor intensive, expensive, and sometimes harmful, when compared to the computerized techniques of the present invention.
Most prior art cosmetic approaches are based on the application of opaque substances. As explained in the cross-referenced application U.S. Ser. No. 11/503,806, there is a need for the precise computer-controlled application of reflectance modifying agents (RMAs), such as transparent dyes, to provide a more effective modification of appearance.
In this specification, the terms “reflectance modifying agent” or “RMA” refer to any compound useful for altering the reflectance of another material, and are explained in further detail below. Some examples of RMA are inks, dyes, pigments, bleaching agents, chemically altering agents, and other substances that can alter the reflectance of human skin and other features. The terms “dye” and “transparent dyes” are used for brevity in this specification to represent any RMA.
Manual cosmetic applications are imprecise compared to computer-controlled techniques, and this imprecision may make them less effective. For example, the heavy application of a foundation base for makeup may cause an unattractive, caked-on appearance. Manual techniques also typically take a long time to employ, as can be seen in any morning commute on a highway, where people frantically take advantage of stops to finish applying their makeup. In addition, manually applied makeup is not cheap, and when the help of professionals such as beauticians is required, is even more expensive. Moreover, often the materials applied to the skin in manual techniques are themselves potentially harmful. For example, a foundation base for makeup may cause skin to dry out and may inhibit the skin's breathing. Sunlight or artificial light used for tanning may cause cancer.
Therefore, there is a need for the precise application of reflectance modifying agents (RMAs) to provide a more effective, more automated, faster, less expensive, and less dangerous modification of the appearance of skin. The cross-referenced patent application cited above presents a system and method for this need.
One problem that an automated system and method of applying RMAs must solve is the design of an applicator with an efficient head. In an embodiment, a useful applicator would be small enough to be held in the hand, would be easy to clean, and would be inexpensive to produce. In addition, it would maintain the scanner and RMA application system at an appropriate distance from the surface to be treated, to ensure accurate scanning and deposition. If the scanner is located too far from or too close to the surface, for example, the results of scanning may not be not be accurate enough to provide a basis for pixel-level cosmetic enhancements. In the same way, a printer head that is not maintained at a proper distance from the surface, for example, will not be able to apply the RMAs with pixel-level precision.
An additional challenge in designing an automated RMA system is preventing outside light from entering around the base of the applicator and scanner and distorting the accuracy of the scanning.
Moreover, the design of the applicator must limit smudging of the RMAs on the surface treated, which may result from contact with hardware elements of the scanner or inkjet printer head. If the rim of an inkjet printer head used for applying RMAs drags across the skin during deposition, for example, it may smudge the effect of the RMAs on the skin. This is especially a problem when applications involve making multiple passes over the surface, because the freshly deposited RMAs may be easily smudged by too much contact with hard surfaces.
Therefore, there is also a need for an RMA applicator head designed so that the applicator is small enough to be handheld, easy to clean, and inexpensive, and that maintains a proper distance between the scanner and RMA printer head and the surface to be treated, while reducing the influence of outside light during scanning and limiting smudging during deposition.
An important element of a cosmetic enhancement system is the ability to separate a scanned image of an area of skin or other human feature into two components, color and surface texture. Color refers to an area's light value, such as lightness and darkness, as well as hue, such as pinkness or yellowness. Surface texture refers to the area's topography, such as the contours of pores, wrinkles, and bumps, both large and small. For example, the system's software uses strategies to accentuate, alter, or camouflage color effects and different strategies for surface texture effects, to make a woman look both young and real.
These and other needs are addressed by the present invention. The following explanation describes the present invention by way of example and not by way of limitation.
It is aspect of the present invention to provide an RMA applicator head that is small enough for a handheld applicator.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide an RMA applicator head that is easy to clean.
It is still another aspect of the present invention to provide an RMA applicator head that is inexpensive.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide an RMA applicator head that maintains a proper distance between its scanner and printer head and the surface to treated, while reducing the influence of outside light during scanning and limiting smudging during deposition.
In accordance with the present invention, a computer-controlled system determines attributes of a frexel, an area of human skin, and applies a reflectance modifying agent (RMA) at the pixel level, to make the skin appear more attractive. The system's scanner and RMA applicator are moved across the skin by means of elements with dispersed raised contact points, for example pounce wheels, which are wheels with points around their outer rims. These contact points maintain a proper distance from the surface to be treated, reduce the influence of outside light during scanning, and limit smudging during deposition. Different motion means with dispersed raise contact points may also used, such as a ball, a comb-like walker, or other geometrical shapes. For example, a square configuration of motion means may be used or a circular one.
In one embodiment, the applicator head further comprises a thin inkjet printer head, a telecentric field lens, a camera, and an RMA reservoir and is attached via a power and data cable to a computer. During an application session, software on the computer uses a camera to sense aspects of color and texture on human features, calculates cosmetic enhancements, and uses the printer head to apply RMA precisely to the features to create those enhancements. Skin landmarks are used for registration.
It is aspect of the present invention to provide an effective method to determine surface texture from scanned data about an area of skin or other human feature.
This and other aspects, features, and advantages are achieved according to the system and method of the present invention. In accordance with the present invention, a software method of differential lighting automatically determines aspects of surface texture from scanned data about an area of skin or other human feature, using a computerized system for scanning that area, calculating enhancements, and applying cosmetics. Scanning with varying configurations of applied lighting captures images in a cycle, with the lighting for some exposures left dark. The exposures are co-synchronized in stacks, where each stack is a grouping of data about a particular instant of time during the scanning. This data may be obtained from directly captured exposures or from interpolated data. Data from an exposure made without applied lighting is subtracted from each stack to remove edge leakage from ambient light. The remaining exposures are used to generate the albedo (color), the north-south tilt, and the east-west tilt of the scanned area. The exposures are then stacked in their visual position in computer memory, and the data is updated using a noise filtering average.
The following embodiment of the present invention is described by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In this embodiment, the present invention comprises an applicator head for an applicator used with a computer-controlled system and method that scans an area of human skin, identifies unattractive attributes, and applies the RMA, typically with an inkjet printer, to improve the appearance of that area of skin. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/503,806 filed Aug. 14, 2006 by the present applicants describes a computer-controlled system and method.
An example applicator head 2, shown in
In an embodiment for speed of application, multiple applicator heads 2 may be assembled in a floating mount, just as multiple floating heads are combined in a single electric razor.
Applicator Head
In one embodiment, the applicator head 2 comprises the following elements, as illustrated in
Plastic Case
The molded case 4A and 4B has rubber “O” type rings for waterproofing, so that the applicator head 2 can be run under the faucet for cleaning, like a razor. The inkjet printer head 8 can be maintained this way, which is not an option in normal printers. In an embodiment, the applicator head 2 may “park” for storage on a stand that would cap the applicator head 2.
Floating Ring
The applicator head 2 is moved across the skin by means of a floating ring 6 with elements with dispersed raised contact points. These contact points maintain a proper distance from the surface to be treated, reduce the influence of outside light during scanning, and limit smudging during deposition. One example of dispersed raised contact points are pounce wheels which are discussed below.
Inkjet Head
A very thin inkjet head 8, illustrated in
Field Lens
A field lens 12 assembly with LED assembly 13 provides telecentric viewing so that size is independent of distance and the view fits around the inkjet head. It fits into case groove 14 and helps protect the electronics behind the lens from water and dirt.
Camera
A camera module 16 with electronics fits into case groove 18.
In an embodiment, the camera module 16 may be a module made for mobile devices such as cell phones. The newer of these modules have 3 megapixels and above. In covering an area half an inch across, just a 1 megapixel camera would have 4 times the resolution of the human eye at 10 inches.
Cosmetic Reservoir
A replaceable cosmetics reservoir 20 and ink is shown only as a block, but it should have a visually appealing and protectable design because it is what consumers would actually buy repeatedly, like razor blades. In an embodiment, the cosmetics reservoir 20 may contain multiple separate RMA colors that may be mixed to achieve desired effects. In another embodiment, it may contain a single RMA color premixed to achieve a desired aim color or effect.
Cable and Computer
In one embodiment, the applicator head 2 is attached to a computer with a cable. In this example, a data and power cable 22 is required. In an embodiment, a USB 2.0 cable may be used. In this example, a consumer computer 24 is required. Almost any newer computer configured correctly with enough disk memory, good display, and a USB port may be used.
Software
Software 26 is required that runs on the computer 24 and provides the functionality for scanning an area of a human feature, such as skin, calculating cosmetic enhancements, tracking registration, and applying the RMA, explained in detail in the cross-referenced application and outlined below.
Method of Operation
The applicator head 2 enables RMA applications that are like conventional cosmetic applications in the sense that the user actually chooses an aim color and “brushes” it on the desired area. This allows a user to select an “aim” skin color, and then deposit to that density. By optical feedback on each frexel (area of human skin), RMA, such as ink or dye, is deposited on each pass until that density is reached. Then no more dye is deposited on subsequent passes. The user may choose to change the aim color manually while applying to different parts of the skin, just as current art requires different colors of blush to be manually selected and applied to different parts of the face to achieve a shaded effect.
In this patent application, the phrase “area of skin” is used to represent any human feature to be enhanced.
The general steps of this process are illustrated in
Step 1000 in FIG. 3—Choosing an Aim Color.
In an embodiment, a user employs an interface on the computer 24, shown in
In yet another embodiment, an applicator may contain premixed RMA for a single aim color, and different applicators may contain different single aim colors. For example, one user might buy an applicator with a light RMA aim color, and another user might buy a different applicator with a darker aim color.
Step 1002 in FIG. 3—Moving the Applicator Containing the Applicator Head 2 Over the Area to be Enhanced.
The user moves the applicator containing the applicator head 2, shown in
Step 1004 in FIG. 3—Capturing Images of the Area to be Enhanced.
As the applicator is moved in a pattern of movement 30, for example the pattern 30 shown in
Step 1006 in FIG. 3—Using Landmarks on the Area to be Enhanced to Provide a Current View of the Area.
Using landmarks, or “skinmarks” on the area of skin 302, shown in
An application session is defined to start when the applicator touches the skin and to end when it is retracted. When the applicator is retracted from the skin, in this mode, all knowledge is erased, and the next application session starts fresh by again placing the applicator some place on the skin and manually sweeping it around an area.
As the applicator is swept back and forth in a path of movement 30, shown in
Positional Data
The software 26, shown in
Step 1008 in FIG. 3—Calculating Enhancements for the Area Represented by the Current View.
The software 26, shown in
Step 1010 in FIG. 3—Applying RMA to the Area Represented by the Current View.
RMA, such as ink or dye, contained in the cosmetic reservoir 20, shown in
Application of Other Substances than RMAs
The applicator of the present invention may be used to apply other substances than RMAs, for example medically beneficial compounds or live skin.
Pounce Wheels and Other Motion Means with Dispersed Contact Points
Example elements with dispersed raised contact points are shown in
In an embodiment, the floating ring 6 shown in
The pounce wheels 7 should be made of durable non-absorptive and hydrophobic material, for example silicon rubber or Teflon, so that they last and do not absorb the RMA. Their heights should also be low, for example 3/16 of an inch (4.8 mm). The use of low heights keeps the system close to the surface so that too much light does not come in underneath the system. The pounce wheels 7 may further be colored black to help absorb light. Their widths should be narrow to further reduce the area that comes into contact with the RMA. Their points should not be very sharp, so that they will not easily puncture surfaces such as skin.
In an embodiment, the pounce wheels 7 may be mounted on thin wires serving as axles.
In an embodiment, twelve pounce wheels may be mounted on each side of the floating ring 6.
In an embodiment, a non-contact, electrostatic wipe (not shown) may be used to blow off the RMA from the pounce wheels 7.
Still other geometrical shapes with dispersed contact points may also be used.
Advantages
Motion means with dispersed contact points are useful for the present invention in several ways. First, the height of the contact points can be used to maintain proper distance from the surface. During scanning, they may be used to maintain a proper distance from the surface to be scanned to ensure effective scanning During deposition, they may also be used to maintain a proper distance from the surface to be enhanced by application with the RMA and so ensure proper application.
Second, the configuration of the dispersed contact points, explained below, can be used to reduce the amount of outside light entering around the base of the applicator and scanner, to prevent distorting the accuracy of the scanning. In this aspect, the contact points serve a baffle to block outside light.
Third, the dispersion and sharpness of the contact points can be used to limit contact with the RMA on the surface being enhanced, reducing smudging. Other motion means, such as a shroud that simply drags across the surface or wheel with flat rims without raised points, would typically cause greater smudging. Motion means with dispersed contact points are especially useful during multiple-pass enhancement, when the applicator must be moved more than once over a freshly applied RMA that would smudge easily.
Configurations of Motion Means
The motion means described above may be mounted in different configurations on an appropriate housing side of elements of the present invention. As shown in
The motion means 700 should be made of durable non-absorptive and hydrophobic material, for example silicon rubber or Teflon, so that they last do not absorb the RMA. Thus, they will typically leave behind minimal deposits of the RMA as they are moved over surfaces.
Their heights should also be low, for example 3/16 of an inch. The use of low heights keeps elements of the system close to the surface so that too much light doesn't come in underneath the system. Their widths should be narrow to further reduce the area that comes into contact with the RMA
Their points should not be very sharp, so that they will not easily puncture surfaces such as skin.
Multiple contact points may be used to achieve the advantages explained above, including baffling light. In an embodiment, twelve pounce wheels or balls may be mounted on a side, as shown in
The motion means 700 is preferably colored black to help absorb light.
The present invention comprises a method of differential lighting that can be used to determine surface texture from scanned data about an area of skin or other human feature. In an embodiment, this method may be used with a computer-controlled system and method that scans an area of human skin, identifies unattractive attributes, and applies RMA, typically with an inkjet printer, to improve the appearance of that area of skin. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/503,806 by the present applicants describes computer-controlled systems and methods.
The present invention is an innovation comprising a method of differential lighting that, in an embodiment, may be employed using this computer-controlled system and method and applicator head.
In this patent application, the phrase “area of skin” is used to represent any human feature to be enhanced cosmetically.
Light Sources
In this embodiment, a plurality of light sources, such as LEDs, are provided, such that each light source represents a directional orientation with respect to the housing. For example, one directional orientation is a North-South-East-West orientation where one or more lights represents each of those directions. Another directional orientation is a circular alignment of light sources such as three light sources arranged about 120 degrees apart. These three sources may be one or more LED.
Field Lens
A field lens 12 with LED assembly 13 provides telecentric viewing so that size is independent of distance and the view fits around the inkjet head. It fits into case groove 14 and helps protect the electronics behind the lens from water and dirt. In one example as described below, the LEDs are configured on a North/South and East/West alignment so that one or more LEDs representing each of those directions may be cycled on an off.
Using Differential Lighting to Determine Surface Texture
The general steps of the present invention's method of using differential lighting to determine surface texture from scanned data about an area of skin are illustrated in
Step 2010 in FIG. 14—Using Varying Lighting Configurations to Capture Images in a Cycle
Images are scanned in a cycle by the applicator head 2, shown in
In an embodiment, six images are captured in a cycle of lighting modes. Each image represents an exposure 40, shown in
The exposures 40 in a cycle are arbitrarily labeled as follows:
There is a hard fix on P, shown in
Step 2020 in FIG. 14—Stacking Channels of Exposures
The exposures 40 are co-synchronized in stacks, where each stack is a grouping of data about a P representing a particular instant of time during the scanning. This data may be obtained from directly captured exposures or from interpolated data.
In the embodiment shown in
One channel 44 in each stack 4 may be directly captured by the camera 16, shown in
If channel 44, shown in
Interpolations may be derived by simple averaging of data from one or more temporally adjacent frames. A weighted average may also be used, where the weight in the average may be higher for a directly captured frame that is closer in temporal position to the frame that is to be derived.
However, simple averaging may be inaccurate for moving images. Thus, for moving images it may be desirable to “push,” or adjust, data about an image in software 26, shown in
Step 2040 in FIG. 14—Subtracting the Dark Exposure from Each Stack to Remove Edge Leakage
In an embodiment, after the five channels are co-synchronized in a stack 42, shown in
Step 2060 in FIG. 14—Using a Set of Exposures to Generate Albedo and Tilt
In an embodiment, the remaining N, S, E, and W exposures 40, shown in
The tilt is a complex equation derived from the differential brightness as seen when illuminated by each LED 13, shown in
Step 2080 in FIG. 14—Storing the Derived Data in Computer Memory
Again based on the known visual position “P” of each exposure 40, shown in
Step 2090 in FIG. 14—Using a Noise Filtering Average
The stored data is updated using a noise filtering average.
Other Applications
The method explained above may be adapted for extrapolating the position of the applicator for actual application of the RMA, for example for firing the inkjet head 8 shown in
In practice, the view from the leading part of the applicator head 2 would confirm and refine position of the applicator head 2 prior to deposition. The “P” value, shown in
In an embodiment, the applicator head 2 is bidirectional, and can be passed back and forth over the skin with continuous deposition. The sensing of the leading and trailing part of the applicator head 2 would alternate according to software's 26 determination of position and direction of movement.
Reducing Reflections and Glare
In an embodiment, the molded plastic case 4, shown in
In an embodiment, several LEDs 13, like those shown in
Other Hardware and Software
It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that different embodiments of the present invention may employ a wide range of possible hardware and of software techniques. For example the communication between a Web service provider and client business computers could take place through any number of links, including wired, wireless, infrared, or radio ones, and through other communication networks beside those cited, including any not yet in existence.
Also, the term computer is used here in its broadest sense to include personal computers, laptops, telephones with computer capabilities, personal data assistants (PDAs) and servers, and it should be recognized that it could include multiple servers, with storage and software functions divided among the servers. A wide array of operating systems, compatible e-mail services, Web browsers and other communications systems can be used to transmit messages among client applications and Web services.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/028,835, filed on Feb. 11, 2008, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and which is related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/889, 291 filed Feb. 11, 2007 by the present inventors for “HANDHELD APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR THE AUTOMATED APPLICATION OF COSMETICS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES;” and is related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/889,299 filed Feb. 12, 2007 by the present inventors for “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A REFLECTANCE MODIFYING AGENT TO IMPROVE THE VISUAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF HUMAN SKINWITH MOTION MEANS WITH DISPERSED CONTACT POINTS” and is related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/889, 288 for “DIFFERENTIAL LIGHTING FOR IDENTIFYING SURFACE TEXTURE” filed Feb. 11, 2007 by the present inventors. This patent application incorporates by reference the specification, drawings, and claims of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/503,806 filed Aug. 14, 2006 by the present inventors for “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A REFLECTANCE MODIFYING AGENT TO IMPROVE THE VISUAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF HUMAN SKIN”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4190056 | Tapper et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4401122 | Clark | Aug 1983 | A |
4628356 | Spillman et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4807991 | Carew | Feb 1989 | A |
4882492 | Schlager | Nov 1989 | A |
5027817 | John | Jul 1991 | A |
5156479 | Iizuka | Oct 1992 | A |
5241468 | Kenet | Aug 1993 | A |
5268166 | Barnett et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5836872 | Kenet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5931166 | Weber et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6021344 | Lui et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067996 | Weber et al. | May 2000 | A |
6111653 | Bucknell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122042 | Wunderman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6151031 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6208749 | Gutkowicz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6250927 | Narlo | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286517 | Weber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292277 | Kikinis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293284 | Rigg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295737 | Patton et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6312124 | Desormeaux | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341831 | Weber et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6436127 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6487440 | Deckert et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6502583 | Utsugi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6543893 | Desormeaux | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554452 | Bourn et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575751 | Lehmann et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578276 | Patton et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6641578 | Mukai | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6706035 | Cense et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719467 | Hess et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6810130 | Aubert et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7027619 | Pavlidis et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7233693 | Momma | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7382400 | Sablak | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7602942 | Bazakos et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7890152 | Edgar et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8027505 | Edgar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8582830 | Edgar et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8610767 | Uzenbajakava et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010040982 | Kim et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020054714 | Hawkins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064302 | Massengill | May 2002 | A1 |
20020081003 | Sobol | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020105662 | Patton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107456 | Leveque | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020155069 | Pruche et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172419 | Lin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176926 | Pletcher et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030045799 | Bazin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050561 | Bazin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053685 | Lestideau | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060810 | Syrowicz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062058 | Utsugi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030063102 | Rubinstenn et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067545 | Giron et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100837 | Lys et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108228 | Garnier | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130575 | Desai | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030208190 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223622 | Simon et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229514 | Brown | Dec 2003 | A2 |
20040005086 | Wolff et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040078278 | Dauga et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125996 | Eddowes et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170337 | Simon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174525 | Mullani | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179101 | Bodnar et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201694 | Gartstein et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236229 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254546 | Lefebvre | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267189 | Mavor et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004475 | Giron | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010102 | Marchesini et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053628 | Montanari et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053637 | Ma Or et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050154382 | Altshuler et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060153470 | Simon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060228037 | Simon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228038 | Simon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228039 | Simon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228040 | Simon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016078 | Hoyt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035815 | Edgar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047761 | Wasilunas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049832 | Edgar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070203413 | Frangioni | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080192999 | Edgar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193195 | Edgar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194971 | Edgar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219528 | Edgar et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090025747 | Edgar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110270200 | Edgar et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140050377 | Edgar et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101287607 | Sep 2010 | CN |
202004003148 | Apr 2005 | DE |
1184663 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1210909 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1304056 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1495781 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1677254 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1763380 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2810761 | Dec 2001 | FR |
59171280 | Sep 1984 | JP |
5281041 | Oct 1993 | JP |
6201468 | Jul 1994 | JP |
11019050 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11019051 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2000139846 | May 2000 | JP |
2000331167 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001112722 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002017689 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002263084 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003052642 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003057169 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003057170 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003513735 X | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003519019 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003210248 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004501707 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004105748 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004315426 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006271654 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007231883 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008526241 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008526284 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2336866 | Oct 2008 | RU |
WO0126735 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0149360 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0177976 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2004028420 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004091590 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2004095372 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2005123172 | Dec 2005 | WO |
W02006008414 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006008414 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006074881 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2007022095 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Second Examiner's Report in Application No. 2006279652, mailed Nov. 3, 2011, 2 pages. |
Railan et al; Laser Treatment of Acne, Psoriasis, Leukoderma and Scars; Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery; Dec. 2008; 285-291. |
Chiu et al; Fractionated Photothermolysis: The Fraxel 1550-nm Glass Fiber Laser Treatment; Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America (2007), vol. 15, Issue 2; May 2007, 229-237. |
Cula et al; Bidirectional Imaging and Modeling of Skin Texture; IEEE Engineering of Medicine and Biology Society; Nov. 2004; 1-6. |
Laubach et al; Effects of Skin Temperature on Lesion Size in Fractional Photothermolysis; Lasers in Surgery and Medicine; Jan. 2007; 14-18. |
Bon et al; Quantitative and Kinetic Evolution of Wound Healing through Image Analysis; 2000 IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, No. 7; Jul. 2000; 767-772. |
Examiner's First Report in Application No. 2008260040, mailed Apr. 13, 2012, 2 pages. |
Notice to File a Response in Application No. 10-2008-7006079, dated Aug. 6, 2012, 10 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 2008-526284, dated Apr. 18, 2012, 10 pages. |
Notification of the Second Office Action for Application No. 200880009579.0, dated Mar. 10, 2012, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Application No. 2009148819, mailed May 30, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Lehrstuhl für Optik 2004 Annual Report” Jun. 2005 (2005-2006), Lehrstuhl Für Optik, Institute Für Optik, Information and Photonik, Max-Planck-Forschungsgruppe, Universität Erlangen-Nu{umlaut over (r)}nberg, Erlangen, Germany, XP002460048, 2 pages. |
EPO Office Action in App. No. 06 801 295.4, mailed Feb. 3, 2010, 3 pages. |
Authorized Officer Nora Lindner, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031441, mailed Feb. 12, 2008, 9 pages. |
Russian Official Action (including translation) for Application No. 2008109234, mailed Apr. 2, 2009, 7 pages. |
EPO Office Action in Application No. 06 801 295.4, mailed Jun. 10, 2008, 3 pages. |
Authorized Officer Moritz Knupling, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031441, mailed Dec. 7, 2007, 2 pages. |
Authorized Officer Lars-Oliver Romich, International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031441, mailed Dec. 7, 2007, 14 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action (including translation) in Application No. 200680037564.6, mailed Jul. 31, 2009, 7 pages. |
Examiner's First Report in Application No. 2006279800, mailed Feb. 2, 2011, 2 pages. |
Russian Deputy Chief S.V. Artamonov, Decision on Grant Patent for Invention (including translation) in Application 2008109235, dated Feb. 19, 2009. |
Authorized Officer Dorothee Mulhausen, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031657, mailed Feb. 12, 2008, 7 pages. |
Authorized Officer Laure Acquaviva, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where applicable, Protest Fees International Application No. PCT/US2008/053527, mailed Jul. 7, 2008, 8 pages. |
Examiner's First Report in Application No. 2006279652, mailed Jan. 28, 2011, 2 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action (including translation) in Application No. 200680037560.8, mailed Jul. 17, 2009, 8 pages. |
EPO Office Action in Application No. 06 789 746.2, mailed Apr. 3, 2009, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031657, mailed Dec. 20, 2006, 2 pages. |
Authorized Officer Athina Nickitas-Etienne, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/053640, mailed Aug. 19, 2009, 5 pages. |
Authorized Officer Michael Eberwein, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/053640, mailed Jun. 3, 2008, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 08 729 481.5, dated Aug. 23, 2010, 5 pages. |
Authorized Officer Jens Clevorn, International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2008/053528, dated Nov. 13, 2008, 4 pages. |
Authorized Officer Jens Clevorn, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2008/053528, dated Aug. 11, 2009, 9 pages. |
Notification of First Office Action for Application No. 200880009579.0, dated Jul. 14, 2010, 10 pages. |
Authorized Officer Simin Baharlou, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2008/065168, mailed Dec. 1, 2009, 8 pages. |
Anonymous, “Circular Polarizer Films,” Internet Article, [Online] 2005, http://www.optigrafix.com/circular.htm [retrieved on Sep. 5, 2008]. |
Authorized Officer Carlos Nicolas, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/065168, mailed Sep. 19, 2008, 13 pages. |
Mike Topping et al., “The Development of Handy 1, A Robotic System to Assist the Severely Disabled,” ICORR '99, Sixth International Conference of Rehabilitation Robotics, Stanford, CA, Jul. 1-2, 1999, pp. 244-249. |
Robot News, “Handy1-Rehabilitation robot for the severely disabled; helping you to eat and drink and brush and even do make-up!”, posted on Apr. 3, 2006, http://robotnews.wordpress.com/2006/04/03/handy1-rehabiliation-robot-for-the-severely-disabledhelping-you-to-eat-and-drink-and-brush-and-even-do-make-up/, 6 pages. |
Mike Topping, “An Overview of the Development of Handy 1, a Rehabilitation Robot to Assist the Severely Disabled” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 34, No. 3, 2002, pp. 253-263. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 2008-526241, dated Aug. 31, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action (including translation) in Application No. 200880009069.3, mailed Jul. 1, 2011, 8 pages. |
EPO Office Action in App. No. 06 801 295.4, mailed Oct. 10, 2011, 5 pages. |
Cula O G et al., “Bidirectional Imaging and Modeling of Skin Texture,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 51, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 2148-2159. |
Chujit Jeamsinkul, “MasqueArray Automatic Makeup Selector/Applicator”, Nov. 11, 1998, Rochester Institute of Technology, 79 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-549296, Apr. 30, 2013, 12 pages. |
Notification of the Third Office Action for Application No. 200880009579.0, dated Jan. 7, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice to File a Response in Application No. 10-2008-7006041, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
Examination Report for European Application No. 08769826.2, dated Jul. 16, 2013, 6 pages. |
Notice to File a Response in Application No. 10-2008-7006079, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 5 pages. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2009-7019063, Mar. 24, 2014, 8 pages. |
Examination Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,619,706, Jul. 31, 2014, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110124989 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12028835 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 13019462 | US |