Intrinsically safe handheld field maintenance tools are known. Such tools are highly useful in the process control and measurement industry to allow operators to conveniently communicate with and/or interrogate field devices in a given process installation. Examples of such process installations include petroleum, pharmaceutical, chemical, pulp and other processing installations. In such installations, the process control and measurement network may include tens or even hundreds of various field devices which periodically require maintenance to ensure that such devices are functioning properly and/or calibrated. Moreover, when one or more errors in the process control and measurement installation is detected, the use of an intrinsically safe hand held field maintenance tool allows technicians to quickly diagnose such errors in the field.
One such device is sold under the trade designation Model 375 Field Communicator available from Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., of Austin, Tex. The Model 375 is an intrinsically safe handheld field maintenance tool that supports communication with field devices of at least two different process communication protocols. In particular, the Model 375 is designed to support HART® and FOUNDATION™ fieldbus devices from many vendors. Moreover, the Model 375 can be used to perform diagnostics for effective startup and trouble shooting of Foundation™ Fieldbus segments. The Model 375 can allow a technician to create a quality segment by diagnosing the network DC voltage and average noise. Moreover, power supply problems can be detected by monitoring low frequency noise on a segment and incorrect terminations and faulty devices can be diagnosed by observing the communications signal level.
In situations where a faulty device is communicating with an appropriate communication signal level, but the communications themselves are erroneous, the diagnostics of prior art handheld field maintenance tools may not suffice. In such cases, relatively larger, and potentially non-intrinsically safe devices such as computers with suitable hardware adaptations are used to essentially capture communication on the process loop in order to allow a technician to diagnose the communication errors. Typically, such computers or control system are located away from the field devices in a control room. Accordingly, if a change is made to a field device in the field, in order to address a communication error, the technician must return to the control room in order to invoke, or otherwise engage, bus monitor functionality in the control system to observe communication of the affected field device.
A handheld field maintenance bus monitor is provided. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor is coupleable to at least one process communication loop and is configured to capture and store a selected quantity of digital communication observed on the process communication loop during a capture period. Optionally, the handheld field maintenance bus monitor may be configured to couple to and interact with process communication loops of at least two different process communication protocols, such as HART® and FOUNDATION™. A method of analyzing captured and stored communication data is also provided.
In this illustration, process communication or process control loop 18 is a FOUNDATION™ fieldbus process communication loop and is coupled to field devices 20, which are shown coupled arranged in a multi-drop configuration. An alternative process communication loop (not shown) is an HART® process communication loop.
Intrinsically safe handheld field maintenance device 22 is coupled to loop 18 as illustrated in
Processor 36 is also coupled to keypad module 38 and display module 40. Keypad module 38 is coupled to the keypad on the housing of device 22 in order to receive various keypad inputs from a user. Display module 40 is coupled to a display to provide data and/or a user interface.
Device 22 preferably includes infrared data access port 42, removable memory module 44 and expansion memory module 48. Infrared data access port 42 is coupled to processor 36 to allow device 22 to transfer information to and from a separate device using infrared wireless communication. One advantageous use of port 42 is transferring data captured by device 22 when used as a bus monitor, which use will be described in greater detail below. Another advantageous use of port 42 is for transferring and/or updating Device Descriptions stored in one or more memories of tool 22. A Device Description (DD) is a software technology used to describe parameters in a field device in a computer-readable format. This contains all of the information necessary for a software application being executed on processor 36 to retrieve and use the parametric data. The separate device such as computer 12, can obtain a new Device Description from floppy disk, CD ROM, or the internet and wirelessly transfer the new Device Description to tool 22.
In one embodiment, removable memory module 44 is removably coupled to processor 36 via port/interface 46. Removable memory module 44 is adapted to store any suitable data including captured digital communications, and/or software applications that can be executed instead of primary applications on processor 36. For example, module 44 may contain applications that use the HART® or FOUNDATION™ fieldbus communication port, to provide a comprehensive diagnostic for a given process valve. Additionally, module 44 may store software applications that aid in the calibration or configuration of specific devices. Module 44 may also store a software image for a new or updated primary device application that can subsequently be transferred into the non-volatile memory of device 36 to enable execution of the updated application. Further still, module 44 provides removable memory storage for the configuration of multiple devices allowing a field maintenance operator to acquire a relatively substantial amount of device data and conveniently store or transfer such data by simply removing module 44.
Preferably, module 44 is adapted to be replaceable in hazardous areas in a process plant. Thus, it is preferred that module 44 comply with intrinsic safety requirements set forth in: APPROVAL STANDARD INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED APPARATUS FOR USE IN CLASS I, II AND III, DIVISION 1 HAZARDOUS (CLASSIFIED) LOCATIONS, CLASS NUMBER 3610, promulgated by Factory Mutual Research October, 1988. Adaptations to comply with additional industrial standards such as Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and the European CENELEC standards are also contemplated. Examples of specific structural adaptations for memory module 44 and/or interface 46 to facilitate compliance include energy limiting circuits such that the operating voltage level of memory module 44 is sufficiently low that stored energy within module 44 cannot generate a source of ignition. Additionally, module 44 may include current limiting circuitry to ensure that in the event that specific terminals on module 44 are shorted, that the discharge energy is sufficiently low that ignition is inhibited. Finally, interface 46 may include physical characteristics that are specifically designed to prevent exposure of electrical contacts on memory module 44 to an external environment while simultaneously allowing suitable interface contacts to make electrical contact with module 44. For example, module 44 may include an over-modeling that can be pierced or otherwise displaced by coupling module 44 to interface 46.
Device 22 also preferably includes expansion memory module 48 coupled to processor 36 via connector 50 which is preferably disposed on the main board of device 22. Module 48 may include a software application that, when executed by device 22, causes device 22 to function as a handheld field maintenance bus monitor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Expansion memory module 48 may also contain Device Descriptions of first and second industry standard protocols. Module 48 may also contain license code(s) that will determine the functionality of device 22 with respect to the multiple protocols. For example, data residing within module 48 may indicate that tool device is only authorized to operate within a single process industry standard mode, such as the HART® protocol. Ultimately, a different setting of that data within module 48 may indicate that device 22 is authorized to operate in accordance with two or more industry standard protocols. Module 48 is preferably inserted to a connector 50 on the main board and may in fact require partial disassembly of device 22, such as removing the battery pack to access port 50.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4337516 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4517468 | Kemper et al. | May 1985 | A |
4540890 | Gangemi et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4635214 | Kasai et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642782 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4924418 | Backman et al. | May 1990 | A |
5005142 | Lipchak et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5067099 | McCown et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5099436 | McCown et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5122948 | Zapolin | Jun 1992 | A |
5274572 | O'Neill et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5305230 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5481200 | Voegele et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5754596 | Bischoff et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5850523 | Gretta, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5923557 | Eidson | Jul 1999 | A |
5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6017143 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026352 | Burns et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6061603 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119047 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6157929 | Zamiska et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211649 | Matsuda | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6285966 | Brown et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298377 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317701 | Pyostsia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6370448 | Eryurek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397114 | Eryurek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405099 | Nagai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6487462 | Reeves | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6564268 | Davis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611724 | Buda et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629059 | Borgeson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6859755 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6889166 | Zielinski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7117122 | Zielinski et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7421531 | Rotvold et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20030204373 | Zielinski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229472 | Kantzes et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040111238 | Kantzes et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040228184 | Mathiowetz | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230327 | Opheim et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249583 | Eryurek et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060048025 | Filipovic | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075009 | Lenz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060155908 | Rotvold et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161393 | Zielinski et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060291438 | Karschnia et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080114911 | Schumacher | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 394 124 | Apr 2004 | GB |
7244625 | Sep 1995 | JP |
94033147 | Feb 1998 | RU |
WO 2009003146 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009003148 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Technical Data Sheet: VIATOR® USB HART® Interface (Model 010031). MACTek Measurement and Control Technologies. |
VIATOR® Bluetooth,® Wireless Technology Interface for use with HART field devices. MACTek Measurement and Control Technologies retrieved from www.mactekcorp.com/product5.htm. |
Product Data Sheet: VIATOR RS232. MACTek Measurement and Control Technologies retrieved from www.mactekcorp.com/product1.htm. |
Second Office Action for related Chinese patent application No. 200780035552.4 dated Jun. 22, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of European Patent Office for related Application No. PCT/US2007/020372 filed Sep. 20, 2007. |
“Foundation Fieldbus Host Interfaces,” National Instruments, “NI AT-FBUS Series, NI PCI-FBUS/2, NI PCMCIA-FBUS Series,” prior to Jun. 2007, pp. 753-754. |
“Data Capture, The Source of Information,” Gemba Solutions, The Stables, Wolvey Lodge Business Centre, Wolvey, Leicestershire, LE10 3HB, prior to Jun. 2007, 2 pages. |
“Product Specification, Foundation Fieldbus, FBT-3,” Relcom Inc., prior to Jun. 2007, p. 1 of 1. |
“FB View, Fieldbus Network Analyzer,” SMAR International, Copyright 2001-2005, 1 page. |
“SMV 3000 Smart Multivariable Transmitter: The Four-in-One Transmitter and Flow Computer,” by Honeywell Inc., Nov. 1995, 6 pages. |
Further Communication from the corresponding European patent application No. 07838559.8 dated Aug. 12, 2011. |
Official Action for Russian patent application No. 2009115645 dated Nov. 17, 2010. |
Communication from European Patent Office dated Mar. 23, 2010 for European application No. 07 83 8559.8. |
Official Action for Russian patent application No. 2009115645 dated Mar. 23, 2011. |
First Office Action for Japanese patent application No. 2009530374 dated Jun. 14, 2011. |
Communication for Russian patent application No. 2009115645 dated Jul. 13, 2010. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200780035552.4 dated Aug. 4, 2010. |
Third Office Action from the corresponding Chinese patent application No. 200780035552.4 dated Mar. 12, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080075012 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |