The present disclosure relates to polishing tools and, more particularly, to handheld fixtures and methods of use.
Failure analysis (FA) is the process of determining how or why semiconductor devices fail. For example, failure analysis allows an engineer and/or designer to understand what caused a failure in order to prevent such failures in the future. By way of example, an electrical failure may be functional or parametric. Functional failure is the inability of a semiconductor device to perform its intended function; whereas, parametric failure is the inability of a semiconductor device to meet certain electrical specifications for a measurable characteristic.
Failure analysis can be performed in many different ways including using automated or manual processes. Manual processes remain the most controllable and accurate method for some failure analysis processes. The manual process requires a tool or fixture for holding a sample during grinding and polishing processes. These fixtures are limited in the sample sizes which can be mounted within the fixture; that is, current fixtures are not very adaptable in allowing different sized samples to be used with the same fixture. Also, some fixtures require hardened pieces of steel as foot pads in order to securely hold the sample. These foot pads, though, ride on polishing media, which causes contamination and scratching of the sample. This contamination can confuse the results of the failure analysis.
In addition, in a manual process, after the samples are encapsulated in epoxy, e.g., potted samples, and placed in the fixture, the operator (e.g., person with a hand) must hold the sample on grinding and polishing wheels. To hold the fixture requires the operator to use a pinch grip holding technique. A pinch grip refers to holding the sample using the index finger and middle finger on one side and the thumb on an opposing side while applying pressure on the polishing and/or grinding wheels. This causes operator fatigue and, in many instances, the pinch grip makes it difficult for the operator to maintain control of the sample for prolonged periods of time. It thus becomes difficult for the operator to make minor adjustments that are constantly needed to ensure that the desired plane of the sample is being maintained.
In an aspect of the disclosure, a structure comprises: at least one hand grip comprising a shape which accommodates a palm of an operator's hand; and a chuck comprising an interior space structured to fix a sample within the chuck and to extend below an underside surface of the at least one hand grip.
In an aspect of the disclosure, a structure comprising: a body; a first handgrip connecting to a first side of the body; a second handgrip connecting to a second side of the body; and a chuck at an underside of the body and positioned to have at least a portion above a bottom surface of the first handgrip and the second handgrip.
In an aspect of the disclosure, a structure comprises: a first handgrip comprising a substantially spherical shape and a notched portion in a bottom side; a second handgrip comprising a substantially spherical shape and a notched portion in a bottom side; a connecting bar connecting to the first handgrip at a first side and the second handgrip at a second side; a recess on an underside of the connecting bar; and a chuck mounted with the recess of the connecting bar and aligned with the notch of the first handgrip and the notch of the second handgrip.
The present disclosure is described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure relates to polishing tools and, more particularly, to handheld fixtures and methods of use. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to ergonomic handheld fixtures which provide for improved hand position during deprocessing of packaged samples, e.g., potted samples, during failure analysis testing. In embodiments, potted samples can be, for example, semiconductor chips, packaged integrated circuits, fibers in a photonics chip, etc., which are subjected to grinding and/or polishing processes for failure analysis. Advantageously, the ergonomic handheld fixtures allow the operator's entire hand(s) to hold the potted sample on a grinding and/or polishing wheel thus greatly reducing fatigue, amongst other advantages discussed below.
In general, the ergonomic handheld fixtures can be used for failure analysis and/or within metallurgical industries and/or rock and mineral industries. The ergonomic handheld fixtures greatly increase user time at the polishing and/or grinding wheels due to the reduction of fatigue which otherwise can occur with poor ergonomics. For example, the ergonomic handheld fixtures allow the operator (i.e., a person with a hand or a robotic mechanism with an arm/hand capable of holding the ergonomic handheld fixtures) to maintain a safe and ergonomic body position, e.g., particularly of the hands, by eliminating the use or need of a pinch grip holding technique. In addition, the ergonomic handheld fixtures eliminate foot pads riding on polishing media, hence avoiding contamination concerns caused by scratching issues. Moreover, the ergonomic handheld fixtures allow the user to maintain the proper plane of the sample, easily allow for adjustment of the sample plane, and may be adaptable for different sample sizes, even large sample sizes of, e.g., 75 mm by 75 mm in dimension.
In embodiments, the handheld fixture 10 shown in
More specifically and referring to
Still referring to
A specimen chuck 16 may be mounted to the handheld fixture 10. More specifically, the specimen chuck 16 may be mounted to an underside of the central connecting body 14 between the handheld grips 12. In embodiments, the specimen chuck 16 may be mounted within a recess 14a on an underside of the central connecting body 14. The recess 14a prevents rotation of the specimen chuck 16. The specimen chuck 16 may be mounted to the central connecting body 14 using any known mounting technique such as a screw 18 extending through the central connecting body 14; although other mounting methods are contemplated herein such as, e.g., epoxy, glue, rivet, etc. In further embodiments, the specimen chuck 16 may be integrated directly with the central connecting body 14, e.g., by injection molding or three dimensional printing. The specimen chuck 16 may be mounted above a lower surface of the handheld grips 12, e.g., above the flat bottomed surface 12a.
The specimen chuck 16 includes opposing walls or mounting surfaces 16a which effectively creates a space (e.g., hollow area) for mounting of a potted sample. In embodiments, the potted sample may be mounted between the opposing walls or mounting surfaces 16a with set screws 20, as an example. In this configuration, the recess 14a and the specimen chuck 16 is above the lower surface of the handheld grips 12 such that a top portion of a potted sample mounted within the specimen chuck will remain above the lower surface of the handheld grips 12. In embodiments, three set screws may be used on one mounting surface and four set screws may be used on the other mounting surface, in an offset manner; although other configurations are contemplated herein.
As shown most clearly in
In the deprocessing operation using the handheld fixtures 10, 10a, a structure or sample to be analyzed, e.g., package, chip, etc., may be embedded within epoxy to form a potted sample. The potted sample may then be mounted to the handheld fixture, within the specimen chuck 16, 16′. The sample may extend to within the recess 22. The set screws 20 may be rotated to securely fix the potted sample to the specimen chuck 16, 16′. The operator places his/her palm on the upper portion of the handheld grips 12 with their fingers around other portions of handheld grips 12. Once properly held, the operator may apply a downward force on the handheld grips 12 for the grinding and/or polishing processes. Due to the shape of the handheld grips 12, the pinch grip holding technique may be eliminated, hence improving control and contributing to less fatigue during the polishing and/or grinding processes. Also, the curvature of the central connecting body 14 may assist in the improved control during the deprocessing operation, as different curvatures may be used to change the center or rotation and inertial moment.
As shown in
Still referring to
In embodiments, each of the handle grips 102 includes a main handle portion 102a, an upper portion 102b and a lower portion 102c. The upper portion 102b includes indentations 102d structured to accommodate the operator's thumb when gripping the handle grips 102; whereas, the main handle portion 102a may be structured to accommodate a remaining portion of the hand, e.g., palm and fingers. Moreover, the lower portion 102c ensures that the operator's hands remain firmly on the handle grips 102, e.g., will not slip off, when applying a downward force during the deprocessing operations. A bottom of the pocket or recess 104 is below the lower portion 102c. In addition, the pocket or recess 104 extends within the body portion 100 to above the lower portion 102c of the handle grips 102.
In embodiments, the upper portion 102b has a length “x” and the lower portion 102c has a length “y”, where “y”>“x”. The different lengths “x” and “y” result in an upper inward tilt angle of about 15° to 22° of the main handle portion 102a. That is, the body portion 100 and the main handle portion 102a are oriented in a non-parallel relationship to provide an ergonomic position for the operator's hands while applying a downward pressure during the grinding and/or polishing processes. The lengths “x” and “y” are also configured to allow the operator to easily fit their fingers through space 108 between the handle grips 102 and the body portion 100, while also ensuring that the fingers do not make contact with the body portion 100 during the deprocessing operations.
In the deprocessing operation using the handheld fixture 10b, the potted sample is placed within the pocket or recess 104 of the handheld fixture 10b. The mounting bracket 106 is mounted to the body portion 100 across the pocket or recess 104, securely fixing the potted sample within the pocket or recess 104. The operator places his/her fingers through space 108, resting their palm on the handle grips 102 with their fingers wrapping around the handle grips 102. The operator may then apply a downward force on the handle grips 102. The lower portion 102c of the handle grips 102 prevents the operator's hand from slipping off the handle grips 102 during the deprocessing operation. Also, by resting the hand on the lower portion 102c and/or placing the thumb within the indentations 102d on the upper portion 102b, it is possible to apply additional downward force on the potted sample during the deprocessing operations.
Referring to
Still referring to
Referring to
In this embodiment, a vacuum port 32 mounted to the specimen chuck 30 communicates with the hollow interior portion 32a. The vacuum port 32 may be connected to a vacuum source so as to remove material that is ground or polished from the potted sample during the deprocessing operations. The potted sample may be fixed within the hollow interior portion 28 by set screws 20.
The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5440784 | Hull et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5726454 | Chun | Mar 1998 | A |
6007409 | Chung | Dec 1999 | A |
6135860 | Tikhonov | Oct 2000 | A |
6261031 | Stipe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
8740513 | Santamarina et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8919230 | Gao | Dec 2014 | B1 |
20030070246 | Cavalheiro | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040117935 | Cavalheiro | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20080016991 | Gauthier | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090308209 | Cross | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20130047796 | Chen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20220281077 | Bronson, Jr. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
205749078 | Nov 2016 | CN |
200280367 | Jul 2002 | KR |
20110034458 | Apr 2011 | KR |
Entry |
---|
“Processing Cross Sections for Sample Preparation”, AZO Materials, Dec. 21, 2018, 2 pages. |
“Lapping and Polishing Machines and Fixtures”, Material Science and Metrology, www.emsdiasum.com, 2021, 12 pages. |
“Polishing Solutions, Helping Your Lab To Shine!”, www.ultratecusa.com, downloaded on Mar. 4, 2021, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220281077 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |