Generally, the present invention relates to handheld printers. Particularly, it relates to a configuration of components in handheld printers of the type able to print at random speeds, in random motion patterns and with random housing orientation relative to a media. Printhead positioning, sensor positioning, printer-to-paper spacing, and a frame assembly arranging the printhead and sensor(s) relative to one another, and to paper, are noteworthy features, to name a few.
As is known, handheld printers afford mobile convenience to users. Users determine the navigation path of a given swath of printing. In some instances, this includes random movement over a media. In others, it includes back-and-forth movement attempting to simulate a stationary printer. Regardless, printer speed, printer orientation, and the path of motion over the media, to name a few, are irregular and virtually random. To assist with this, optical and/or mechanical sensors are known to sense position on the paper and activate printing whenever the area underneath the printing element matches an imprinted section of a to-be-printed latent image.
With reference to
Nonetheless, a need exists in the art of handheld printers to optimize placement of the printhead and sensors so that the printable area is maximized, while the paper gap is minimized during printing. In that prior handheld printers have had ongoing problems keeping their printhead and/or sensors consistently spaced from the paper, the need must also contemplate maintaining an optimal spacing from the paper. Naturally, any improvements along such lines should further contemplate good engineering practices, such as relative inexpensiveness, stability, flexibility, ease of manufacturing, etc.
The above-mentioned and other problems become solved by applying the principles and teachings associated with the hereinafter described configuration for handheld printers. Specifically, methods and apparatus contemplate handheld printers manipulated randomly or predictably over a media on which an image is printed. A controller correlates a location of a printhead to the image and causes printing from fluid firing actuators of the printhead. Position sensors provide input to the controller to assist in navigation.
In a representative embodiment the printhead and position sensors front one another in a triangular configuration thereby providing a large printable area compared to the prior art. A frame commonly mounts the printhead and sensors and is biased to keep an acceptable paper-to-printer gap during use. A forward opening door accepts the printhead before printing. The configuration also enables avoidance of ink smearing during use and relative short electric cables between components.
These and other embodiments, aspects, advantages, and features of the present invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following description of the invention and referenced drawings or by practice of the invention. The aspects, advantages, and features of the invention are realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities, procedures, and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification, illustrate several aspects of the present invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention and like numerals represent like details in the various figures. Also, it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that process, mechanical, electrical, architectural, software and/or other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. In accordance with the present invention, a configuration of components for a handheld printer is hereafter described.
With reference to
In
At one surface 118 of the housing 112 is a portion 119 of a flexible circuit, especially a tape automated bond (TAB) circuit 120. At 121, another portion 121 is adhered to surface 122. Electrically, the TAB circuit 120 supports a plurality of input/output (I/O) connectors 124 for connecting an actuator chip 125 (also known as a heater chip or transducer chip) to the handheld printer during use. Pluralities of electrical conductors 126 exist on the TAB circuit to connect and short the I/O connectors 124 to the input terminals (bond pads 128) of the actuator chip 125 and skilled artisans know various techniques for facilitating this. In an exemplary embodiment, the TAB circuit is a polyimide material and the electrical conductors and connectors are copper or aluminum-copper. For simplicity,
At 132, the actuator chip 125 contains at least one ink via that fluidly connects to the ink of the compartment 116. During printhead manufacturing, the actuator chip 125 is attached to the housing with any of a variety of adhesives, epoxies, etc., as is well known in the art. To eject ink, the actuator chip contains columns (column A-column D) of fluid firing actuators, such as thermal heaters. In other actuator chips, the fluid firing actuators embody piezoelectric elements, MEMs devices, and the like. In either, this crowded figure simplifies the actuators as four columns of six dots or darkened circles but in actual practice the actuators might number several dozen, hundred or thousand. Also, vertically adjacent ones of the actuators may or may not have a lateral spacing gap or stagger in between. In general, the actuators indeed have vertical spacing, such as about 1/300th, 1/600th, 1/1200th, or 1/2400th of an inch along the longitudinal extent of the via. Further, the individual actuators are typically formed as a series of thin film layers made via growth, deposition, masking, patterning, photolithography and/or etching or other processing steps on a substrate, such as silicon. A nozzle member with pluralities of nozzles or nozzle holes, not shown, is adhered to or fabricated as another thin film layer on the actuator chip such that the nozzle holes generally align with and are positioned above the actuators to eject ink at times pursuant to commands of a controller.
With reference to
In a basic sense, the controller 22 is able to discern content of a signal(s) output from the position sensor, and supplied as an input to the controller (bi-directional arrow), and correlate it to the printhead, especially its individual fluid firing actuators to eject ink 35 to print an image. In a detailed sense, the controller is able to compare a signal of the position sensor indicative of a previous location 23, shown as a 4×7 matrix of pixels, to a signal of the position sensor indicative of a current location 25, shown as another 4×7 matrix of pixels, each having four hatched pixels translated from a first position 27 to a second, later position 29. Representatively, the four hatched pixels indicate relatively dark grayscale values on the media 16 that are observed in different orientations over time as a user or operator manipulates the housing 14 to print an image. In turn, the controller is to discern a difference between the previous and current locations and correlate same to the location of the printhead. The controller need also do this quickly and efficiently. In one instance, this means the controller will examine or search the current location for a presence, (such as the four hatched pixels) of the previous location.
In other aspects, the controller contemplates an intake checker 31 between the sensor and controller, or part and parcel of the controller, to assess validity of the signal(s) of the position sensor and to arrange the information thereof such that an actual or proximate relative distance D between the housing and the media can be ascertained. It also contemplates establishment of a threshold inquiry determining whether the housing of the printer is relatively close or far away from the media and whether such is sufficient to conduct further signal processing. Intuitively, operators of the handheld printer have freedom to lift the housing from the media and, if too far away from the media, the signal from the position sensor becomes fairly unusable, or invalid. On the other hand, touching the housing to the media or positioning it within a predetermined close interval renders the signal, and its attendant data, valid. Validity checking also considers application per every instance of a signal received from the sensor or application that occurs randomly, on specified occasions or at predetermined times.
In addition, the controller 22 contemplates a to-be-printed representation of an image 32, especially in bitmap form. It correlates the position of the printhead, especially individual actuators, to the image. It then prints the image with ink 35 on the media 16 according to the image pattern 36 in the pixels 38. A has-been-printed image 34 may also be stored or accessed by the controller to keep track of future printing and to determine whether the image has been printed completely or not. Alternatively, the to-be-printed image 32 is dynamically updated to remove pixels that have been printed so that the has-been printed information 34 is merged with the to-be-printed information. In structure, the controller embodies an ASIC, discrete IC chips, FPGA's, firmware, software, a microprocessor, combinations thereof or the like. The controller further includes a memory to keep track of image data or other information, such as storage and accessibility relative to position sensor signals and their manipulation to compute printer location. Memory also finds utility in general housekeeping matters, such as storage of an operating system, display panel items, print jobs, user features, etc.
With combined reference to
In that the Print Area* of the Table was calculated based on a standard 8.5 ×11 inch letter-sized paper, other print area improvments are achieved with other sized media as skilled artisans will appreciate. Also, skilled artisans will be able to contemplate other size advances by even more tightly controlling tolerances, such as by positioning components closer, shrinking component size, or other.
Another advantage lies in that the printhead 110 fronts the entirety of the sensors. No longer are sensors on a front and back side of the printhead, thereby no attendant electrical contacts or other structures dictate a loading direction into the housing of the printer. A door 70 (
With reference to
In other embodiments, shapes are anticipated other than the T-frame whereby both sides of the position sensors are considered to be reference surfaces so that sensors can be attached to either side of the T-frame. More likely, only one side is referenced, and the T-frame might become shaped more like a letter “E.” Regardless, the frame should be dimensionally stable and manufactured to precise tolerances. Possible materials include aluminum or other metal that might be die cast and/or machined to final dimensions; a fiber-filled polymer molded to shape; or a machinable plastic like polyacetal homopolymer. In all designs, it is anticipated that the weight of the frame will be lighter than frames adopted in prior art so as to bounce freely. Further, so long as the dimensional relationship of the sensors and printhead is fixed after calibration, the frame can move somewhat within the printer housing during use because the location of the ink jets remains fixed relative to the position determined by data from the sensors. This means that sudden changes in print direction or angle by the operator can be damped and so reduce the likelihood of navigation failure.
Certain other advantages contemplate assuring that the media or paper is adequately supported. In one implementation, a switch or sensor can detect vertical motion of the frame when the printer is pressed on the paper, and a signal can be used to block or prevent printing whenever the printer is not in contact with well-supported paper, e.g., part of the intake checker 31,
Still other advantages of the invention over the prior art should be readily apparent. For example, the present invention minimizes the possibility of ink smearing. The triangular printhead/sensor configuration allows the printhead to be cantilevered over the paper, unlike the prior art linear configuration, e.g.,
One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional embodiments are also possible without departing from the teachings of the present invention. This detailed description, and particularly the specific details of the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein, is given primarily for clarity of understanding, and no unnecessary limitations are to be imported, for modifications will become obvious to those skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure and may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Relatively apparent modifications, of course, include combining the various features of one or more figures with the features of one or more of other figures.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4675700 | Nagira et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4758106 | Yasui et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4758849 | Piatt et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4915027 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4933867 | Ishigaki | Jun 1990 | A |
4947262 | Yajima et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949391 | Faulkerson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
RE33425 | Nihei | Nov 1990 | E |
4999016 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013895 | Iggulden et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024541 | Tsukada et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5028934 | Kasai et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5052832 | Akiyama et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063451 | Yanagisawa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5093675 | Koumura et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110226 | Sherman et al. | May 1992 | A |
5111216 | Richardson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5149980 | Ertel et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152624 | Buschmann et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160943 | Pettigrew et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5181521 | Lemelson | Jan 1993 | A |
5181523 | Wendelborn | Jan 1993 | A |
5184907 | Hamada et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186558 | Sherman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188464 | Aaron | Feb 1993 | A |
5236265 | Saito et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240334 | Epstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5262804 | Petigrew et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267800 | Petteruti et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5308173 | Amano et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311208 | Burger et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312196 | Hock et al. | May 1994 | A |
5344248 | Schoon et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355146 | Chiu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5446559 | Birk | Aug 1995 | A |
5449238 | Pham et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5462375 | Isobe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5475403 | Havlovick et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5503483 | Petteruti et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520470 | Willett | May 1996 | A |
5578813 | Allen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593236 | Bobry | Jan 1997 | A |
5634730 | Bobry | Jun 1997 | A |
5644139 | Allen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650820 | Sekine et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5685651 | Hayman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5686720 | Tullis | Nov 1997 | A |
5729008 | Blalock et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5786804 | Gordon | Jul 1998 | A |
5806993 | Petterutti et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816718 | Poole | Oct 1998 | A |
5825044 | Allen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829893 | Kinoshita et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842793 | Katayama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848849 | Kishi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850243 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853251 | Imai | Dec 1998 | A |
5862753 | Dolan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5887992 | Yamanashi | Mar 1999 | A |
5892523 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5927872 | Yamada | Jul 1999 | A |
5953497 | Kokubo et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5984455 | Anderson | Nov 1999 | A |
5988900 | Bobry | Nov 1999 | A |
5997193 | Petterutti et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004053 | Petteruti et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005681 | Pollard | Dec 1999 | A |
6010257 | Petteruti et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017112 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6062686 | Kinoshita et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076910 | Anderson | Jun 2000 | A |
6092941 | Imai | Jul 2000 | A |
6147777 | Jung | Nov 2000 | A |
6158907 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164853 | Foote | Dec 2000 | A |
6195475 | Beausoleil, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203221 | Tomasik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246423 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249360 | Pollard et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259826 | Pollard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261011 | Day et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270187 | Murcia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6270271 | Fujiwara | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6338555 | Hirose | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347897 | Huggins et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6357939 | Baron | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367993 | Day et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6373995 | Moore | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379058 | Petteruti et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394674 | Huggins et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6398432 | Day et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409401 | Petteruti et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433780 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6481905 | Day et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6499840 | Day et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503005 | Cockerill et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6533476 | Hamisch, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6553459 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568777 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572290 | McCleave et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583895 | Kuwahara et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6604874 | Carriere et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607316 | Petteruti et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609844 | Petteruti et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623191 | Huggins et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626597 | Fujiwara | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641313 | Bobry | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648528 | Hardisty et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652090 | Silverbrook | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6674543 | Day et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688739 | Murray | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6736502 | Deguchi | May 2004 | B2 |
6742887 | Ando | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20010019349 | Kawakami | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010022914 | Iura et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024586 | Day et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020033871 | Kaiser | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020090241 | Fujiwara | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127041 | Huggins et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154186 | Matsumoto | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186293 | Ando | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030031494 | Cockerill et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063938 | Hardisty et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030117456 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040009024 | Hardisty et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018035 | Petteruti et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027414 | Boleda et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040061727 | Kang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080316290 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |