1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of non-invasive external ultrasound lipoplasty, skin tightening, and various non-invasive aesthetic, dermatologic, and therapeutic applications.
2. Prior Art
During a non-invasive external ultrasound lipoplasty, skin tightening, aesthetic, dermatologic, or other therapeutic procedure with a handheld transducer, it becomes particularly important to apply and distribute the ultrasound energy dose according to the amount and location of the fat to be emulsified, the degree and location of skin tightening needed, or the extent and type of aesthetic, dermatologic, or other therapeutic desired effect.
For this purpose the transducer's movement or instantaneous scanning speed needs to be known or better yet its position from which the scanning speed can be easily derived.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,347,855 teaches a passive system of computerized tracking of a multiplicity of target volumes with compensation for body movements.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,645,162 teaches an active tracking system depicted in their
“Selective Creation of Thermal Injury Zones in the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Using Intense Ultrasound Therapy”, (Matthew W. White et al., ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG, Vol. 9, January/February 2007) shows an ultrasound probe by Ulthera with an internal transducer performing a controlled linear motion, thereby acting as an active tracking system.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,150,716 is specific to diagnostic ultrasound, and teaches two methods (and systems) of detecting transducer scanning speed, namely one through the use of an sensor similar to an optical computer mouse and another through real time de-correlation of ultrasound images.
In the case of a handheld transducer without hardware to do the spatial and time feedback, the control has to come through the operator. It should be realized that the optimum speed of the transducer across the skin is strongly related to the optimum local exposure time. Too short an exposure time (fast motion) will not give adequate cavitation or heat (when needed) and could therefore reduce the efficacy of the procedure to near zero. Too slow a motion could create too much cavitation or heat with the potential for indiscriminant tissue destruction. In order to separate cavitation and heating further, there may be cases where multiple passes over the same area are necessary.
a is a functional block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention.
b is a functional block diagram of an alternate form of the embodiment of
a is a functional block diagram of another embodiment of the present invention.
b is a functional block diagram of alternate form of the second embodiment.
The optimum transducer “scanning” speed for delivering a predetermined dose of ultrasound to a desired treatment area determined by a scanning plan is a function of both the cavitation related Mechanical Index (MI) and tissue temperature Thermal Index (TI) settings. While cavitation is a threshold mechanism there is both an amplitude factor beyond the threshold level and an exposure time factor involved in emulsifying a certain fraction of the treated fat, whereby low settings require a slow scanning speed and high settings require faster scanning speeds. The relationships can be estimated from the numerical values of MI and TI and further refined empirically using data from animal and clinical studies. Furthermore, since the transducer is not 100% energy efficient, its face (skin contact area) will create heat and if not properly controlled may present a hazard for potential skin burns. Moving the transducer across the skin surface will also significantly reduce localized peak skin temperature. In the case where there is a sensor monitoring the transducer face temperature, control of the skin heating can be included in the speed indicator. If there is no transducer face temperature sensor the suggested transducer movement speed component due to tissue heating can be based on empirical data from animal and clinical studies.
There are at least three approaches for addressing control of the ultrasound dose delivery, as summarized in
One method requires the user to be part of the feedback loop, whereby the system, the transducer, or a separate device acts as a visual guide for the user to apply the desired scanning speed. The first embodiment is an example of this approach.
Another method consists of a subsystem that detects the transducer scanning velocity and in real time transfers this information to the system, which in turn adjusts parameters such as MI and TI (i.e., ultrasound dose) to achieve the desired effect based on the actual speed of transducer movement. This relieves the user from precisely matching the desired scanning speed, but still requires the user to keep track of the transducer position and the ultrasound beam focal depth. The second embodiment is an example of this.
A third method monitors the transducer position, which is transferred to the system in real time. With this information and the presence of a clock, the transducer velocity may also be easily calculated. Now the system can automatically adjust the needed parameters such as MI, TI and focal length to accomplish the planned treatment, giving the user the freedom to move the transducer almost “at will”. The third embodiment is an example of this.
It should be noted that there is much more value in using a 3D coordinate system, where the (contoured) skin defines two of the dimensions and the depth below the skin surface is the third, rather than a Cartesian coordinate system fixed to the operating room or even fixed to localized patient movements.
The connecting lines in the functional block diagrams in
One embodiment (
Another version (
A second embodiment is a separate flexible scanning speed guidance pad 5 (
A third embodiment is an optical 2D location sensor technology similar or identical to those used in an optical computer mouse, as in
Alternatively the sensor information may be wirelessly communicated to the system.
As with a computer mouse, the optical 2D location sensor can lose track of the transducer position if lifted from the surface (skin). This can be overcome with a simple calibration process, whereby the user moves the transducer to a marked calibration spot on the skin, push a calibration button on the transducer or on the system, and moves the transducer on the skin to the desired location.
In the case of a “brush-beam” (non circular symmetric beam) it becomes important to scan approximately perpendicular to the width (long axis) direction of the brush-beam.
This third embodiment is very adaptable to a scanning plan in which the user graphically composes a 3D volume using software within the system or off line, showing the relative location and amount of treatment wanted, both with respect to cavitation (fat emulsification), heating (skin tightening), or other aesthetic/dermatologic/therapeutic treatments. Off line use of the scanning plan software allows data transfer to the system. During the procedure, the system can keep track of the transducer's location and in real time can adjust critical parameters such as MI, TI and focal depth (if equipped with electronic focusing), so the desired treatment “dose” eventually will be delivered. The real time difference between the desired and actual delivered “dose” can also be displayed on the system graphically in a 2D format, so the user can concentrate the transducer motion in the area where more treatment is needed. This allows the user to move the transducer freely within certain boundaries with respect to both position and speed.
For the best outcome with respect to the treatment plan, the transducer needs to be oriented perpendicular to the skin and in the case of a brush-beam transducer, the scanning velocity vector needs to be perpendicular to the brush width direction. However, an angular error relative to the exact perpendicularity is a cosine function, meaning that it is a weak dependency, so that in reality, perpendicularity need not be monitored, but can be continuously estimated by the user.
The suggested speed shown by the various embodiments of the speed indicator can be based on MI, TI and instantaneous transducer face temperatures and/or acquired data from animal and clinical studies. While the above methods are intended to be used in conjunction with a non-invasive ultrasound lipoplasty transducer, the inventions, the scanning light source of the first two embodiments can be used on handheld transducers for other modalities, including aesthetic, dermatologic, or other therapeutic applications. In the claims to follow, a reference to a handheld external ultrasound treatment transducer is a reference to a handheld external ultrasound transducer useable for lipoplasty, skin tightening, aesthetic, dermatologic/, and other therapeutic purposes.
Thus, while certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/995,895 filed Sep. 28, 2007.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US08/78188 | 9/29/2008 | WO | 00 | 3/26/2010 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60995895 | Sep 2007 | US |