The present invention concerns an opening control of a door leaf of a motor vehicle such as a door of a motor vehicle. More specifically but without restriction, the invention applies in particular to the field of safeguarding a motor vehicle by means of a safety device equipping a handle system of the opening control and configured to prevent the inadvertent opening of the door leaf during a violent impact caused for example by an accident.
In general, the closure of a door leaf, for example a door of the vehicle, is carried out by means of a latch comprising a pin secured to the door adapted to cooperate with a striker secured to the bodywork. In order to open the door leaf from outside the vehicle, a handle system known by the generic name of «external opening control» or also known by the acronym «EOC», is actuated.
Such a system comprises a handle which, when pulled by a user, causes the unlocking of the latch. In general, the handle of the door leaf of the motor vehicle is hingedly mounted on a support frame which is fixed with respect to the door leaf. For example, the system also comprises a pivoting transmission lever hinged in the support frame and which can be actuated by the handle. This pivoting lever is coupled to a transmission part such as a cable or a rail enabling the actuation of the latch.
The action exerted on the handle, translates, through the kinematic chain of the EOC, in the clearance of the pin off the striker and therefore the opening of the door. When the user releases the handle, the latter is brought back into the rest position by a biasing member.
In the absence of any safety device, it is understood that during a lateral impact, the inertial force related to the mass of the handle could reach, and even exceed, the tension force that is usually necessary to open the door. Indeed, a lateral impact is capable of generating high magnitude instantaneous accelerations on the handle. Hence, the magnitude of the generated inertial forces could be considerable, even with lightweight handles.
Besides, the stiffness of the spring of the handle is of course quite insufficient to resist the opening force exerted by the inertial force applied to the handle.
There are known various handle systems for vehicle door leaves, provided with a safety device allowing avoiding opening of the door leaf, in the event of an accident, by the effect of the deceleration undergone by the grip portion of the handle.
A first solution of a safety device proposed in the state of the art is based on an inertial principle and consists of a device with a counterweight and a biasing spring. The counterweight is mounted on an axis to which the handle is also connected, so as to impart on the axis, during a lateral impact, an inertial torque opposite to that of the inertial force yet without resisting the normal opening movement of the door because it consists in this case of slow movements with a low acceleration. When a user pulls on the handle to open the door, he drives at the same time the counterweight of the safety device, which is brought back afterwards into its initial position by the biasing spring when the user releases the handle.
This first solution has the advantage of being relatively inexpensive, but it has nonetheless drawbacks. In particular, the presence of a counterweight increases the bulk of the external opening control system across the thickness of the door and weighs down the vehicle with non-functional masses. Besides, this known safety device does not operate for very high accelerations because of the inertia of the counterweight.
A second solution of a safety device proposed in the state of the art is also an inertial solution, but operating this time by blocking the kinematic chain of the external opening control. This second known device is constituted by an inertial mass disposed so as to drive, during a lateral impact, a member adapted to block, for example, the transmission lever of the kinematic chain thereby preventing the clearance of the pin of the latch off the striker. A biasing spring is present to bring the inertial mass back into its rest position.
For example, such a solution is described in the European patent application EP 1 556 569 which discloses a «frigo handle» type handle, commonly known for its inertia at impacts, equipped with an inertial mass brought to be interposed on the pathway of a drive lever kinematically connected to a gripping portion of the handle, by the effect of such an impact.
There is also known the document US2018/171686 which describes an opening control of a door leaf of a motor vehicle, such as a door. Said control comprises a case intended to be fastened to the door leaf and a handle configured for gripping by a user, movable in rotation relative to the case between at least one flush position in which the handle is totally or partially housed within the case, an ejected position in which the handle comes at least partially out of the case, so that the user could grasp the handle and open the door leaf, and an open position, in which the handle has caused the unlocking of the door leaf. The opening control also comprises an ejection lever of the handle connected to the handle by at least one common axis of rotation. Moreover, the opening control comprises a safety device configured to block an ejection of the handle towards its open position in the event of an impact. This safety device comprises a blocking pawl which abuts against the internal lever and blocks the rotation of the handle in the clockwise direction, according to the direction of ejection of the handle and a second pawl. The latter consists of an ejection lever pawl subjected to an elastic biasing force with urges it into a position of engagement with the lever. This pawl, referred to as the ejection lever pawl, is provided with a first torsion spring. The function of the ejection lever pawl is to block the rotation of the ejection lever, and therefore to block the ejection of the handle. Indeed, the first pawl is arranged so as to be displaced between a first position in which the first pawl engages with the ejection lever and blocks the ejection of the ejection lever and a second position in which the first pawl is no longer engaged with the ejection lever.
Moreover, the document FR3024173 describes a handle assembly for opening a door leaf of a motor vehicle, for example a door. The handle assembly comprises at least: a case intended to be fastened to the door leaf, a lever configured for gripping by a user, the lever being movable in rotation relative to the case and at least between: a closed position, in which the lever is totally or partially housed within the case, an ejected position, in which at least one portion of the lever comes out from the case, so that the user could exert said gripping in order to cause an unlocking of the door leaf, and an open position, in which the lever has caused the unlocking of the door leaf. Furthermore, it comprises an ejection mechanism connected to the lever, the ejection mechanism comprising an ejection elastic member which is elastically deformable between: a considerably deformed position, in which the ejection elastic member exerts an ejection force adapted to displace the lever from the closed position to the ejected position, the considerably deformed position being reached when the lever is in the closed position, and a slightly deformed position, in which the ejection elastic member exerts a negligible force, the slightly deformed position being reached when the lever is in the ejected position, the ejection mechanism comprising a deformation device configured to deform the ejection elastic member when the lever is displaced from the ejected position to the open position.
All these inertial safety solutions have the drawback of operating only in one single direction. Consequently, in some cases of particular impacts, the safety device will be made ineffective. Furthermore, the balancing of the mass of the handle may result in a considerable bulk inside the opening control, an increase of the weight and therefore a non-negligible environmental impact.
The invention aims in particular at overcoming these drawbacks with a handle system which gets rid of the need to resort to inertial solutions while being particularly effective in the event of an impact, and that irrespective of the direction of the impact.
To this end, an object of the invention is a handle system for a door leaf of a motor vehicle comprising:
said handle system being remarkable in that the safety device comprises a blocking pawl elastically biased into a position of blocking the pivoting of the secondary branch according to a handle ejection direction and in that the safety device comprises at least one lever for releasing the secondary branch in the ejection direction, the release lever being configured to drive the blocking pawl, against its elastic biasing force, into a release position of the secondary branch, consecutively to a manual mechanical action of pushing in the handle from its flush position and/or to the triggering of an electric actuation for ejecting the handle from its flush position.
Thanks to the invention, during a violent impact, the handle remains blocked thanks to the blocking pawl which prevents the secondary branch from pivoting in the ejection direction of the handle. In order to actuate the handle system, the latter comprises at least one release lever which allows disengaging the blocking pawl and therefore releasing the secondary branch in the ejection direction of the handle.
A handle system according to the invention may include one or more of the following features listed hereinafter.
In a preferred embodiment, the safety device comprises first and second levers configured to release the blocking pawl respectively in reaction to the manual mechanical action and in response to the electric triggering.
In another embodiment of the invention, the blocking pawl has an elongated general shape, in particular a finger-like shape, which extends longitudinally in a vertical direction and is provided at an upper end with a blocking means which cooperates with a complementary means arranged on the secondary branch.
In another embodiment of the invention, the safety device comprises a shaft mounted on the bracket about which the pawl is pivotally movable and a member for elastically biasing the blocking pawl into the blocking position.
In another embodiment of the invention, said at least one release lever comprises a catch tiltably mounted in the bracket configured to cooperate with the blocking pawl such that the tilting of the catch drives the blocking pawl into its release position.
In another embodiment of the invention, the catch is provided with a retaining sear cooperating with a complementary bearing formed on the secondary branch, the sear and the bearing being configured so that the push-in of the handle into its pushed-in position causes the tilting of the catch.
In another embodiment of the invention, the blocking pawl comprises a transverse extension stud and the catch is provided with a recess within which the stud is housed in the blocking position, the recess flaring outwardly while delimiting a step so as to form a fork configured to retain and drive the stud during the tilting of the catch.
In another embodiment of the invention, the catch has a cam profile delimiting a guide surface so as to cooperate with the secondary branch and shaped so as to reposition the catch after the tilting thereof.
In another embodiment of the invention, the secondary branch is free to pivot in the direction opposite to the direction of ejection of the handle.
In another embodiment of the invention, the push-in mechanical action of the handle triggers a mechanical ejection of the handle.
In another embodiment of the invention, said release lever comprises a member movably mounted so as to pivot on a pivot axis common with the blocking pawl and elastically pre-biased in the blocking position of the pawl such that the triggering of an electric actuation releases the member in pivoting in a direction opposite to its pre-biasing driving with it in pivoting the blocking pawl out of its blocking position.
In another embodiment of the invention, the safety device is configured so that the moment applied with respect to the common pivot axis of the elastic biasing force exerted on the pre-biased member is higher than the moment of the elastic biasing force exerted on the blocking pawl.
In another embodiment of the invention, the handle system comprises an electric actuator and an electric ejection lever arm of the handle controlled by the actuator to be displaced between an initial pre-biasing position of the pivoting member in which the handle is in a flush position and an end ejection position of the handle.
In another embodiment of the invention, said member is elastically pre-biased by the ejection arm into the blocking position, the electric actuation of the arm progressively releasing the elastic tensioning of the member.
Other features and advantages of the invention will appear in light of the following description, made with reference to the appended drawings in which:
In
This handle system is referred to by the general reference numeral 10.
In this example, the handle system 10 includes a handle support frame or bracket 12 represented in
The handle 14 is illustrated in detail in
In the described example, the handle 14 is of the «flush» type, that is to say the cavity of the bracket 12 is dimensioned so as to receive the handle 14 in a retracted configuration. In this retracted configuration, the external surface of the handle 14 is flush with the external surface of the external wall of the door leaf. In the extended or deployed configuration, the handle 14 comes out at least partially from the cavity of the bracket 12 so as to enable grasping thereof by a user of the vehicle in order to open the door. For this purpose, the user can pull the handle 14 further outwards in order to control the latch of the door and the opening of the door leaf. In the flush position, the external surface of the opening control 10 coincides with the external surface of the door leaf. This «flush» arrangement, known in the automotive industry, allows enhancing the style of the vehicle and reduces the aerodynamic drag.
In this example, the handle system 10 is intended to cooperate with a latch (not represented) of the door leaf of the motor vehicle prone to adopt a locked configuration and an unlocked configuration. Conventionally, the pivoting of the handle 14 about its hinge axis X1 actuates the latch in either one of the locked or unlocked configurations via a drive kinematic chain (not represented in the figures).
In the example illustrated in
The electric actuation portion 18 will now be described in detail. For its electric operation, as illustrated in
The ejection arm 20 is also provided with a tab 24 extending vertically. Furthermore, preferably, as shown in
It is known that it is desirable to electrically control the ejection of the handle 14 of the door leaves of the motor vehicle. But, for the case where there would be a breakdown of the electric power supply, the handle 14 should of course enable manual maneuvering thereof, for example by simply acting on the handle 14 itself.
Thus, in the described example, the handle system 10 also comprises a backup mechanical portion enabling a manual mechanical actuation of the ejection and retraction movement of the handle 14 in the event of a failure of the electric actuator. For example, in the event where the electric operation turns out to be impossible because of an electric failure, the backup mechanism is provided for example with an elastic energy accumulator. In an advantageous but non-limiting embodiment, the push-in of the handle 14 allows triggering the backup mechanism.
For example, the backup mechanism is configured to be mechanically activated in response to a push-in action of the handle 14, the end of the push-inaction or the release being adapted to cause the triggering of the backup mechanism. For example, the backup mechanism comprises a kinematic drive chain for moving the handle 14 which automatically drives the movement of the handle 14 over all or part of a stroke starting from the pushed-in position of the handle 14 to the flush position through the ejected position. Preferably, the mechanism is configured to drive the movement of the handle 14 over the entire stroke. Of course, other embodiments of the backup mechanical operation may be suitable yet without departing from the scope of the invention.
In accordance with the invention, the handle system 10 comprises a safety device 30. This safety device 30 is configured to block an ejection of the handle 14 towards its open position in the event of an impact.
In the following description, the terms “upper” and “lower” as well as the other equivalent expressions that are used should be understood by taking as a reference in the appended drawings, an axis with a vertical direction, which corresponds to a use of the handle system resting on a horizontal plane. Hence, these orientations are used only with reference to the description hereinafter and to the figures and do not correspond to the actual orientations of the elements in an operational use of the handle system, that is to say integrated to a door leaf of the motor vehicle. The same applies to the counterclockwise S1 and clockwise S2 directions of rotation which relate to the appended figures.
The safety device 30 comprises a blocking pawl 32. As represented in detail in
This pawl 32 is pivotally mounted about a pivot axis extending transversely. To this end, the safety device 30 comprises a pivot rod 40 mounted on the bracket 12 about which the pawl 32 is pivotally mounted. For example, the pawl 32 is provided on one of its faces with a hollow sleeve 42 delimiting a cylindrical bore for receiving the pivot rod 40.
Referring to
Furthermore, the safety device 30 comprises at least one lever for releasing the secondary branch 14A in pivoting in the ejection direction S1 of the handle. In accordance with the invention, the release lever is configured to drive the blocking pawl 32 in a release direction of the secondary branch 14B, against the elastic biasing force of the blocking pawl 32 into the blocking position. The driving of the pawl 32 into this release position is carried out either in reaction to a manual action of pushing in the handle 14 from its flush position, or in reaction to the triggering of an electric action of ejecting the handle 14 from its flush position.
Preferably, the system 10 comprises two release levers: a first release lever 50 enables the disengagement of the blocking pawl 32 in response to the manual action and a second release lever 70 enables the disengagement of the blocking pawl 32 in response to the electric action.
The two release levers 50 and 70 of the blocking pawl 32 will now be described in more detail hereinafter.
Preferably and as illustrated in
Such a catch 50 is illustrated in detail in
Preferably, the catch 50 is provided with a retaining sear 58 cooperating with a complementary bearing 60 formed on the secondary branch 14A. In the illustrated example, the retaining sear 58 extends according to an axial direction from the head 52.
As shown in
Furthermore, preferably, the blocking pawl 32 comprises a transverse extension stud 62 and the catch 50 is provided with a recess 64 within which the stud 62 is housed in the blocking position. In the example, the body of the catch 50 thus comprises a lower portion 66 configured for the gripping of the blocking pawl 32. Thus, as illustrated, the catch 50 has a lower extension 66 of the head 55 shaped like a plate into which the recess 64 is formed.
In the described example, the recess 64 comprises an internal notch with a rounded bottom which extends outwardly in a flared portion by forming a fork 65 configured to drive and retain the stud 62 during the tilting of the catch 50 in the clockwise direction S2. In this example, the recess 64 is provided with a step 67 delimiting on the one hand the internal notch and on the other hand the outer flared portion shaped like a fork 65.
Moreover, the catch 50 has a cam profile delimiting a guide surface 68 for cooperating with the secondary branch 14A and enabling the repositioning of the catch 50 after the tilting thereof. In the described example, the guide surface 68 is shaped so as to cooperate with the projecting relief forming the bearing 60 of the secondary branch 14A. For example, this guide surface 68 comprises a curved profile.
Preferably and as illustrated in
Referring to
Preferably, in the blocking position of the pawl 32, the pivoting member 70 is elastically pre-tensioned or pre-biased by the ejection arm 20. The displacement of the arm 20 during the electric actuation of the ejection of the handle 14 enables the progressive release of the tensioning of the member 70 which is elastically biased, in a direction opposite to the pre-biasing thereof, towards a rest position and which drives, in its movement, the blocking pawl 32 out of its blocking position.
Preferably, the safety device 30 is configured so that the moment applied with respect to the common pivot axis of the pawl 32 and of the member 70 of the elastic biasing force exerted on the pre-tensioned member 70 is higher than the moment of the elastic biasing force exerted on the blocking pawl 32.
The main operation aspects of a handle system according to the invention will now be described in two operating configurations: an electric configuration illustrated by
In the initial state common to both operating configurations, the system is like in
In
In contrast with the electric control for retracting the handle 14 causes the displacement of the ejection arm 20 in a direction opposite to the direction of the arrow F1 and positions the pivoting member 70 in a pre-tensioned state also bringing the blocking pawl 32 simultaneously back into its blocking position.
In
In the example illustrated in
Thus, thanks to the invention, during a violent impact and irrespective of the direction of the impact with respect to the handle system 10, the handle 14 is held in its closed position. Furthermore, the handle system 10 enables the normal operation in the manual mode and/or in the electric mode of the actuation of the handle 14.
Of course, the invention is not limited to the previously described embodiments. Other embodiments within the reach of those skilled in the art may also be considered yet without departing from the scope of the invention defined by the claims hereinafter.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
19/03734 | Apr 2019 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8833813 | Muller | Sep 2014 | B2 |
10072447 | Fujiwara | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10563437 | Bartels | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10655371 | Soonthornwinate | May 2020 | B2 |
10760307 | Rocci | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10975598 | Guerin | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20180171686 | Couto Maquieira et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20200190866 | Guerin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200386019 | Jeong | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210156179 | Savant | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1556569 | Apr 2009 | EP |
3396088 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3023865 | Jan 2016 | FR |
3024173 | Jan 2016 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200318397 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |