The present invention relates to a handling device for an installable and retrievable subsea apparatus, the subsea apparatus in a releasable manner to engage an apparatus mating ISO standardized docking device on a subsea installation, the docking device having a pair of outwardly extending engagement members having an aperture and an engagement rim, as defined in the preamble of claim 1.
The prior art solutions comprises means and methods of attachment and securing a subsea apparatus to a docking device of a subsea installation, and these solutions rely on a complex multi-step procedure which may require several tools and/or multiple handling operations to be available to a ROV which is to install or retrieve the apparatus. The prior art also relies on a number of movable parts within the connection interface to provide a latching or locking mechanism.
It is an object of the invention to overcome the complexity and disadvantages related to the prior art solutions in order to enable the subsea apparatus, sometimes known as a retrievable module, to be locked to another module or actuator subsea by aid from a ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle), using existing known ROV tools and capabilities. The invention is intended to cooperate with and be able to docket a lower region of the apparatus in a “female” ISO-standardized, e.g. “ISO class 4-type” docking device, frequently known as a “connection bucket” without any alterations of the docking device.
Further, the invention has as an object to provide a robust, easy to handle and easy to use device for the co-operation with the ROV and which does not require a complex linkage or depend on tightly guided elements, and in addition provides for a clear, optically readable indication of a locked status of the apparatus in the docking device.
Contrary to the prior art related to securing such connections, the inventive device is very simple, robust and easy to use. It provides a good interface to the ROV which will assist the installation or retrieving of the apparatus.
According to the invention, the handling device is characterized in:
that the device is configured as a yoke which is provided with a top member and a pair of engagement arms depending therefrom to extend along an outside face of the apparatus,
that each of the arms at a free end thereof is provided with a hook configured to engage in a releasable manner a rim on the docking device,
that a rotary handle is located above the top member and has an integral or linked stem which extends through the top member and is pivotally linked to a top region of the apparatus,
that the handle and its stem in a first rotary position are movable transversely of the top member between set limits, but are rotationally locked relative a main body of the apparatus hanging freely from the stem,
that the handle and its stem are locked and prevented from any movement relative to the top member when in a second rotary position with the handle closest to the top member and with the arm hooks in engagement with the docking device rims, and thereby locking docking engagement between the apparatus and the docking device, and
that a rear side of the hooks is inclined to gradually engage a lower region of the apparatus and upon its movement into the ISO docking device to cause the hooks to be pressed into and held in engagement with the docking device rims.
The arrangement of the handle and the stem relative to the top member of the handling device as well as relative to the main body of the apparatus enables an easy and safe way of lowering or lifting, i.e. handling the apparatus to and from a docking device using the handle.
According an embodiment of the handling device, the stem is provided with a pair of engagement pegs configured upon rotation of the handle and stem to engage, climb on and come to rest on an underside portion of the top member facing the apparatus.
According to another embodiment of the handling device, the top member is provided with a spring to assist the apparatus to move from a first position to a second position over a limited distance away from the top member when the hooks have entered into engagement with said rims.
According to a further embodiment of the handling device, the handle and its stem are in a rotary mode when the apparatus is adjacent or at said second position.
The invention is now to be described with reference to the attached drawings which illustrate in an exemplifying, non-limiting manner aspects of the handling device and its operation.
The present invention comprises a handling device 1 for an installable and retrievable subsea apparatus 2, the subsea apparatus in a releasable manner to engage an apparatus mating ISO standardized docking device 3 on a subsea installation. The docking device 3 has a pair of outwardly extending engagement members 4, 5 having an aperture 4′; 5′ and an engagement rim 4″; 5″. The device is configured like a yoke which is provided with a top member 6 and a pair of engagement arms 7, 8 depending therefrom to extend along an outside face of the apparatus 2. Each of the arms 7; 8 is at a free end thereof provided with a hook 7′; 8′ configured to engage in a releasable manner the rim 4″; 5″, respectively, on the docking device 3.
A rotary spindle or male member (not shown) may be located in the docking device 3 and linking such member e.g. with a valve spindle in the subsea installation.
A rotary handle 9 is located above the top member 6 and has an integral or linked stem 10 which extends through the top member 6 and below the top member 6 is pivotally linked to a top region 2′ of the apparatus 2. The handle 9 is configured to be engaged by an ROV (not shown).
The handle 9 and its stem 10 are in a first rotary position as shown on
As shown on
A rear side 7″, 8′ of the hooks 7, 8 is inclined to gradually engage an inclined portion of a lower region 2″ of the apparatus 2. Upon the apparatus movement into the ISO docking device 3, the hooks 7, 8 will be caused to be pressed into and held in engagement with the docking device rims 4″, 5″.
The arrangement of the handle 9 and the stem 10 relative to the top member 6 of the handling device 1 as well as relative to the main body of the apparatus 2 enables an easy and safe way of lowering or lifting, i.e. handling the apparatus to and from the docking device 3 using the handle 9.
The stem 10 is provided with a pair of engagement pegs 11 configured upon rotation of the handle 9 and stem 10 to engage, climb onto and come to rest on an underside portion 6′ of the top member 6 facing the apparatus 2. Note that the pair of pegs 11 is visible on
As shown on
As will be observed from inspecting the drawings, a same relative movement of the apparatus 2 relative to the hooks 7, 8 and the docking device 3 will disengage a rotational locking of the handle 9. Disengagement is made possible as the pegs 11 are moved below the top member 6, thereby leaving locking engagement with the abutment 6″ and the slot 6′″, see
The top member 6 is provided with a spring 12 which assists in defining two axially distinct positions of the handle 9 and its stem 10, as well as the apparatus 2, i.e. when the apparatus 2 moves from a first position as e.g. shown on
As indicated above, when the apparatus 2 is properly docketed in the device 3, the lower region 2″ of the apparatus prevents the hooks 7′, 8′ from dislodging from the rims 4″, 5″. It will be noted that the handle 9 and its stem 10 are in a rotary mode, i.e. free to rotate from the first rotary position to the second rotary position, suitably rotation through 90°, when the apparatus 2 is adjacent or at said second position, as shown on
By turning the handle 9 and the stem 10 into the position shown on
The top member 6 is effectively lifted over the projecting pegs 11 on the handle stem 10 when the apparatus is fully inserted into the ISO docking device or “bucket”, enabling the ROV to rotate the handle 9 to provide a positive confirmation the locked state.
The top member 6 is movable in the axial direction relative to the apparatus 2, but is not movable in radial direction relative to the apparatus 2. As will be appreciated from studying the drawings, the arms 7, 8 are attached to top member and depend therefrom. The arms 7, 8 are movable substantially in the axial direction of the apparatus 7 when there is a corresponding axial movement of the top member 6. Further, they are flexible to be slightly bendable sideways relative to a respective adjacent side of the apparatus 2, as is clearly visible from studying
It is understood that the top member has a certain, suitably high stiffness, although it will still flex somewhat when loaded, thus ensuring that tension of the locking state is maintained during the course of time.
The invention provides for a reduction in complexity of latching operation, a reduction of number of required part, cost, and reliability improvement due to fewer movable parts, compared to typical prior art worm-screw latch arrangement.
It will be appreciated that when the apparatus 2 is to be released from engagement with the docking device, the steps as indicated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20141134 | Sep 2014 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2015/050163 | 9/17/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/043599 | 3/24/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3520358 | Brooks | Jul 1970 | A |
3635184 | Liautaud | Jan 1972 | A |
RE27745 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1973 | E |
3953982 | Pennock | May 1976 | A |
4030309 | Mason | Jun 1977 | A |
4120362 | Chateau | Oct 1978 | A |
4138148 | Zaremba | Feb 1979 | A |
4175620 | Nolan, Jr. | Nov 1979 | A |
4443129 | de Sivry | Apr 1984 | A |
4557628 | Cowan | Dec 1985 | A |
4611953 | Owens | Sep 1986 | A |
4661017 | Wood | Apr 1987 | A |
4730677 | Pearce | Mar 1988 | A |
4746246 | Cowan | May 1988 | A |
4753552 | Karal | Jun 1988 | A |
4805951 | Andersson | Feb 1989 | A |
4832530 | Andersen | May 1989 | A |
4842075 | Kalvenes | Jun 1989 | A |
4860681 | Svenning | Aug 1989 | A |
5069580 | Herwig | Dec 1991 | A |
5146989 | Rouse | Sep 1992 | A |
5318115 | Rouse | Jun 1994 | A |
5458439 | Hall | Oct 1995 | A |
5593249 | Cox | Jan 1997 | A |
6029745 | Broussard | Feb 2000 | A |
6068427 | Østergaard | May 2000 | A |
6234717 | Corbetta | May 2001 | B1 |
6276625 | Chee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6644410 | Lindsey-Curran | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7112009 | Mackinnon | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7181980 | Wium | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7318479 | Williams | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7704016 | Gransaether | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8307903 | Redlinger | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353350 | Overfield | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9222328 | Stokes | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9988129 | Jamieson | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20020040782 | Rytlewski | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020040783 | Zimmerman | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030167997 | Colyer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050145389 | Barrow | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050241410 | Wium | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070227740 | Fontenette | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253158 | Gransaether | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035327 | Fowkes | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080264643 | Skeels | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120090152 | White | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130025419 | Opstad | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130058732 | Anda | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20150086299 | Jamieson | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150239538 | Jewell | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160167756 | Wolfenbarger | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160297502 | Heiler | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160318591 | Jamieson | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180148301 | Canny | May 2018 | A1 |
20180162503 | Reid | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2413639 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2493253 | Jan 2013 | GB |
324823 | Dec 2007 | NO |
Entry |
---|
Toll, Anders, “International Search Report” prepared for PCT/NO2015/050163; dated Jan. 18, 2016; 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170247093 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |