The subject matter relates to a haptic feedback device having multiple operational modes including multiple resonant modes.
Generally, electro-mechanical transducers exhibit a level of power consumption that may be higher than desired. Furthermore, such electro-mechanical transducers may not be able to produce haptic feedback of a desired magnitude or bandwidth due to space constraints.
What is needed is an electro-mechanical transducer that is configured to produce vibrotactile feedback having a relatively high magnitude and/or an adjustable bandwidth. Additionally, it would be desirable to have an electro-mechanical transducer that can generate haptic feedback having relatively low energy consumption.
An electronic device and method of operating comprises a housing; a base coupled to the housing; and an electro-mechanical transducer coupled to the base, the electro-mechanical transducer configured to operate in a resonant mode and output a haptic effect upon receiving a drive signal at a predetermined drive frequency. In an embodiment, the electro-mechanical transducer further comprises a plurality of electro-mechanical transducers, each electro-mechanical transducer configured to operate in its respective resonant mode and output a respective haptic effect upon receiving a drive signal having a predetermined drive frequency. Alternatively or additionally, the electro-mechanical transducer further comprises a plurality of spaced apart electro-mechanical devices coupled thereto in a serial fashion between a first end proximal to the base and a second end distal to the base. In an embodiment, at least one mass is located a different predetermined distance from the base than a mass of another electro-mechanical device in the plurality. In an embodiment, at least one mass has a weight different than a mass of another electro-mechanical device in the plurality. In an embodiment, the drive frequency of the drive signal applied to two or more of the electro-mechanical transducers in the plurality has a substantially same value. In an embodiment, the drive frequency of the drive signal applied to at least one electro-mechanical transducer in the plurality is at a higher order of the resonant frequency of another electro-mechanical transducer in the plurality.
An apparatus comprises a signal source, a driver and an electro-mechanical transducer having a cantilever. The signal source is configured to output a haptic feedback signal. The driver is configured to receive the haptic feedback signal and output a drive signal. The electro-mechanical transducer has a cantilever and is configured to receive the drive signal. The electro-mechanical transducer is configured to have a set of operational modes. Each operational mode from the set of operational modes has at least one resonant mode from a set of resonant modes.
In one embodiment, electro-mechanical devices are used in an electro-mechanical transducer that is configured to output haptic feedback in an operational mode having one or more resonant modes. The electro-mechanical transducer is also configured to have multiple operational modes. Such a device can produce diverse and robust haptic feedback that can exhibit relatively low power consumption in a space-efficient manner. Although many embodiments described herein relate to using cantilevers as resonant structures, analogous devices are also possible. For example, such resonant structures can use acoustic cavities, membranes, mass-springs, wheel-torsional springs, and/or other structures capable of exhibiting mechanical resonance. Some embodiment, for example, can have a combination of different types of structure capable of exhibiting mechanical resonance.
As used herein, the term “operational mode” means a method or manner of functioning in a particular condition at a given time. For example, if a first electro-mechanical device is operating in a first resonant mode and a second electro-mechanical device is operating in a second resonant mode, the electro-mechanical transducer is operating collectively in, for example, a first operational mode. Alternatively, for example, if the first electro-mechanical device is operating in a third resonant mode, and the second electro-mechanical device is operating in a fourth resonant mode, the electro-mechanical transducer is operating collectively in a second operational mode. In another example, if the first electro-mechanical device is operating in a first resonant mode, and the second electro-mechanical device is not operating, the electro-mechanical transducer is operating collectively in a third operational mode. In other words, a given operation mode can be based on one electro-mechanical device operating in a resonant mode and another electro-mechanical device not being activated.
The term “resonant mode” means any mode of an electro-mechanical device operating in a frequency band centered around a resonant frequency. When an electro-mechanical device operates at or near a resonant frequency, several consequences occur. For example, when a transducer operates at or near a resonant frequency, the inertial term and the elastic terms substantially cancel. The power consumed by the actuator is then dedicated to balance dissipation (e.g. damping). If the dissipation is low, for example, in a cantilevered piezo-electric beam (i.e. a resonator with a high Q factor), the displacement is relatively large and limited by dissipative forces. In addition, if the mass that resonates is comparable to the mass of the structure to which the transducer is attached (e.g. case of a telephone), then the structure vibrates with a relatively large magnitude. Power lost during activation is in the dissipation. The remaining power is transmitted to the anatomy of the person with which the device is in contact.
The term “electro-mechanical device” as used herein, means an individual active component configured to provide haptic feedback. The term “active component” refers to a single component that provides a mechanical response to the application of an electrical signal. For example, for the embodiment illustrated in
The term “electro-mechanical transducer” means an apparatus having one or more electro-mechanical devices coupled to a mechanical ground. For example, in the illustrated in
An embodiment of an electro-mechanical transducer is illustrated in
Drive 110 receives a haptic feedback signal and outputs a drive signal to electro-mechanical transducer 120. The haptic feedback signal may be based on a command from a microprocessor within, for example, a computer or a portable communications device (not shown). The electro-mechanical transducer 120 is configured to selectively operate in one of multiple possible operational modes at a given time. The operational mode of the electro-mechanical transducer 120 at a given time will depend, for example, on the characteristics of the drive signal received from driver 10. For a given operational mode, an electro-mechanical transducer can operate in multiple resonant modes as will be described in greater detail below. The one or more electro-mechanical devices 121 of electro-mechanical transducer 120 collectively output haptic feedback based on the drive signal, as illustrated in
The piezoelectric bar 200 is a bimorph piezoelectric device that is a two-layer bending motor having a length (L) 220 substantially larger than a width (W) 210. In one embodiment, the piezoelectric bar 200 has a width (W) 210 of approximately 0.6 mm, a length (L) 220 of approximately 25 mm and a height (H) 230 of approximately 5 mm. Alternatively, the piezoelectric bar can have any suitable dimensions depending on the desired use.
When a voltage 240 from, for example, a drive source (not shown), is applied across the piezoelectric bar 200, the piezoelectric bar 200 will flex. An appropriate level of voltage 240 to be applied to the piezoelectric bar 200 can be selected, based at least in part, on the material and the thickness of the material used to construct the piezoelectric bar 200.
The piezoelectric bar 200 can be driven near a resonant frequency. When the piezoelectric bar 200 is driven near a resonant frequency, impedance transformation may be obtained. Impedance transformation results in large mechanical displacements as described above.
An electro-mechanical device 300 that can be used in combination with other electro-mechanical devices to construct an electro-mechanical transducer is illustrated as
The electro-mechanical device 300 illustrated in
The electro-mechanical device illustrated in
When the drive frequency fd of the voltage 340 is such that the electro-mechanical device 300 operates near its resonant frequency, the electro-mechanical device 300 can produce a large vibration sensation relative to the voltage 340 applied to the electro-mechanical device 300.
Both the weight of mass 320 and the length of the piezoelectric bar 310 affect the amplitude of the displacement. Furthermore, the weight of mass 320 and the length of the piezoelectric bar 310 affect the resonant frequencies of the electro-mechanical device 300. Therefore, the particular resonant frequencies may be tailored by selecting the appropriate length of the piezoelectric bar and/or weight of the mass 320 for a desired resonant frequency. When voltage 340 is applied to the piezoelectric bar 310, the electro-mechanical device 300 will move in a plane oriented as vertical for the depiction in
The embodiment illustrated in
The operation of the electro-mechanical device 350 is similar to the embodiment described with reference to
Piezoelectric bars 411, 421, and 431 have lengths L1, L2, and L3, respectively. In one embodiment, these lengths may be the same. Alternatively, lengths L1, L2, and L3 can be different. Additionally, the weights of masses 412, 422, and 432, can be equal to one another. Alternatively, weights of the masses 412, 422, and 432 can be different from one another. The particular configuration of the masses 412, 422 and 432 and the lengths of the piezoelectric bars 411, 421, and 431 can be based on the desired frequency response from the electro-mechanical transducer 400.
The operation of the electro-mechanical transducer in
In an alternative arrangement, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can include electro-mechanical devices 410, 420, and 430 that have different lengths L1, L2, L3. In this arrangement, each of the electro-mechanical devices 410, 420, and 430 has a different resonant frequency f1, f2 and f3, respectively. These different resonant frequencies can be driven at different drive frequencies f1, f2 and f3. An example of the frequency response for an electro-mechanical transducer 400 is illustrated in
In another arrangement, masses 412, 422, and 432 and lengths L1, L2, and L3 of electro-mechanical devices 411, 421, and 431 can be configured such that a single drive frequency, fd, may be used to drive, for example, the resonant mode in electro-mechanical device 411, the first resonant mode in electro-mechanical device 422, and the second resonant mode in electro-mechanical device 432.
In yet another arrangement, the bandwidth of the electro-mechanical transducer 400 may be adjusted by selectively operating one or more of the electro-mechanical devices 410, 420, 430 in different resonant modes. Each one of these combinations of resonant frequencies collectively superpose into a different operational mode of the electro-mechanical transducer 400.
In a first operational mode, for example, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can be operated such that electro-mechanical devices 410 and 430 may be operating at frequencies f, and f3, respectively, with f1 and f3 being resonant modes of the electro-mechanical devices 410 and 430, respectively. A voltage need not be applied to electro-mechanical device 420 in this operational mode. In this operational mode, the output of the electro-mechanical transducer 400 would include peaks 510 and 530 illustrated in
In a second operational mode, for example, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can be operated such that electro-mechanical devices 410 and 420 are operating at frequencies f1 and f2, respectively, where f1 and f2 are resonant modes of the electro-mechanical devices 410 and 420. In this operational mode, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can produce an output having only two peaks, as illustrated, for example, in
In a third operational mode, for example, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can be operated such that electro-mechanical devices 420 and 430 may be operating at frequencies f2 and f3, respectively, where f2 and f3 are resonant modes of each of the electro-mechanical devices 420 and 430. In this operational mode, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can produce an output having only two peaks, as illustrated, for example, in
In other operational modes, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can be operated such that one of electro-mechanical devices 410, 420 and 430 is operating at frequencies f1, f2 and f3, respectively, where f1, f2 and f3 are resonant modes of each of the electro-mechanical devices 410, 420 and 430. In these operational modes, the electro-mechanical transducer 400 can produce an output having only one peak at a time. In other words, operational modes are possible where only a single electro-mechanical device is actuated at a given time.
The voltage can be modulated at a number of different drive frequencies, fd. For example, the drive frequency fd can approximate a resonant mode of the electro-mechanical devices. Alternatively, fd can include any other frequency that is an integral multiple of the electro-mechanical device's resonant frequency.
While certain operational modes have been described with reference to
Additionally, while the embodiments were described above with reference to electro-mechanical devices that included piezoelectric bars, any electro-active material or device can be used. For example, the electro-mechanical devices can include electro-active polymers (EAP), voice coil transducers or other electromagnetic device, an inertial resonant device, or a resonant eccentric rotating mass (HERM) device. An example of an inertial resonant device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,088,019. An example of a HERM device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,580.
In this embodiment, electro-mechanical transducer 600 comprises one electro-mechanical device, the structure of which corresponds to the structure of electro-mechanical transducer 600. The piezoelectric bar 610 is secured to a base member 650, which acts as a mechanical ground and remains substantially fixed with respect to the movement of the electro-mechanical device 600. Masses 620, 630, and 640 can have equal weights or can have different weights. Alternatively, the weights of the two masses can be equal to one another, while the weight of the third mass can be different. Additionally, the masses 620, 630, and 640 can be equally spaced along the length of the piezoelectric bar 610 or can be spaced at any desired location along the length of the piezoelectric bar 610. The weight of and spacing between masses 620, 630, and 640 allow the electro-mechanical device to be designed to have a predetermined number of resonant frequencies.
Next, the operation of the embodiment illustrated in
Frequency modulated voltage can be applied to the piezoelectric bar 610. As illustrated in
Additional electro-mechanical devices can be added and can have the drive signal selectively applied thereto to collectively yield a variety of different operational modes of the electro-mechanical transducer. Alternatively, the electro-mechanical transducer may include multiple masses, as illustrated in
In another embodiment, a number of electro-mechanical devices in a serial configuration, as illustrated in
The devices described above are capable of being used in small, portable devices where energy consumption needs to be low. For example, electro-mechanical transducers can be used in cellular phones, electronic pagers, laptop touch pads, a cordless mouse or other computer peripherals whether cordless or otherwise, a personal digital assistant (PDA), along with a variety of other portable and non-portable devices.
While the particular embodiments were described above with respect to piezoelectric bars, they are not limited to the use of piezoelectric bars and piezoelectric devices having various structures can be used depending on the desired application of the electro-mechanical transducer. For example, the piezoelectric device can have a planar shape where the width is approximately the same as the length.
While particular embodiments have been described with reference to piezoelectric ceramics, numerous other electro-mechanical devices may be used. For example, the electro-mechanical devices may include electro-active polymers (EAP), voice coil transducers or other electromagnetic device, or resonant eccentric rotating mass (HERM) devices.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of should not be limited by any of the above-described embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalence.
The previous description of the embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the embodiments. While various electro-mechanical transducers have been described including at least one electro-mechanical device including a piezoelectric substance, various other electro-mechanical devices may be utilized that can be configured to operate in multiple operational modes, each one of the multiple operational modes including a number of resonant modes. Other modifications to the overall structure of the electro-mechanical devices and arrangement of the selector-mechanical transducers can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments.
This application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/792,279, filed Mar. 4, 2004, entitled, “Haptic Devices Having Multiple Operational Modes Including At Least One Resonant Mode” which is a continuation-in-part and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/301,809, entitled “Haptic Feedback Using Rotary Harmonic Moving Mass” and filed Nov. 22, 2002; and U.S. Patent Application No. 60/375,930, entitled “Haptic Feedback Using Rotary Harmonic Moving Mass” and filed Apr. 25, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2972140 | Hirsh | Feb 1961 | A |
3157853 | Hirsh | Nov 1964 | A |
3220121 | Cutler | Nov 1965 | A |
3497668 | Hirsh | Feb 1970 | A |
3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3623064 | Kagan | Nov 1971 | A |
3902687 | Hightower | Sep 1975 | A |
3903614 | Diamond et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3911416 | Feder | Oct 1975 | A |
3919691 | Noll | Nov 1975 | A |
4127752 | Lowthorp | Nov 1978 | A |
4160508 | Salisbury, Jr. | Jul 1979 | A |
4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4262240 | Arai | Apr 1981 | A |
4262549 | Schwellenbach | Apr 1981 | A |
4333070 | Barnes | Jun 1982 | A |
4334280 | McDonald | Jun 1982 | A |
4355348 | Williams | Oct 1982 | A |
4382166 | Kim | May 1983 | A |
4414984 | Zarudiansky | Nov 1983 | A |
4459440 | Wiczer | Jul 1984 | A |
4464117 | Foerst | Aug 1984 | A |
4473725 | Kim | Sep 1984 | A |
4484191 | Vavra | Nov 1984 | A |
4490841 | Chaplin et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4581491 | Boothroyd | Apr 1986 | A |
4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4600854 | Bednorz et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4706294 | Ouchida | Nov 1987 | A |
4708656 | de Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
4731603 | MacRae et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4768412 | Sanderson | Sep 1988 | A |
4794392 | Selinko | Dec 1988 | A |
4795296 | Jau | Jan 1989 | A |
4868549 | Affinito et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885565 | Embach | Dec 1989 | A |
4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5022384 | Freels et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022407 | Horch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035242 | Franklin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5078152 | Bond et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5103404 | McIntosh | Apr 1992 | A |
5107262 | Cadoz et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5146566 | Hollis, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5165897 | Johnson | Nov 1992 | A |
5172092 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175459 | Danial et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184310 | Takenouchi | Feb 1993 | A |
5184319 | Kramer | Feb 1993 | A |
5186629 | Rohen | Feb 1993 | A |
5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5203563 | Loper, III | Apr 1993 | A |
5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
5227594 | Russo | Jul 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245245 | Goldenberg | Sep 1993 | A |
5261291 | Schoch et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271290 | Fischer | Dec 1993 | A |
5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
5283970 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5296871 | Paley | Mar 1994 | A |
5299810 | Pierce et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309140 | Everett, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
5334893 | Oudet et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5354162 | Burdea et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5388992 | Franklin et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5389849 | Asano et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399091 | Mitsumoto | Mar 1995 | A |
5405152 | Katanics et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5435729 | Hildreth et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436622 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437607 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5437608 | Cutler | Aug 1995 | A |
5438529 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440183 | Denne | Aug 1995 | A |
5456341 | Garnjost et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466213 | Hogan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5547382 | Yamasaki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5565840 | Thorner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575761 | Hanjianpour | Nov 1996 | A |
5580251 | Gilkes et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583478 | Renzi | Dec 1996 | A |
5587937 | Massie et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589828 | Armstrong | Dec 1996 | A |
5619180 | Mossimino et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625575 | Goyal et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631861 | Kramer | May 1997 | A |
5643087 | Marcus et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650704 | Pratt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661446 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669818 | Thorner et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684722 | Thorner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689285 | Asher | Nov 1997 | A |
5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5709219 | Chen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714978 | Yamanaka et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734236 | Motegi | Mar 1998 | A |
5734373 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735280 | Sherman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736978 | Hasser et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739811 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742278 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754023 | Roston et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766016 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781172 | Engel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784052 | Keyson | Jul 1998 | A |
5785630 | Bobick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790108 | Salcudean et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805140 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828363 | Yaniger et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5842162 | Fineberg | Nov 1998 | A |
5857986 | Moriyasu | Jan 1999 | A |
5889672 | Schuler et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894263 | Shimakawa et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896076 | van Namen | Apr 1999 | A |
5897437 | Nishiumi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907212 | Okada | May 1999 | A |
5914705 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943624 | Fox et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945772 | Macnak et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952806 | Muramatsu | Sep 1999 | A |
5973670 | Barber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984880 | Lander et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986643 | Harvill et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001014 | Ogata et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004134 | Marcus et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020876 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037927 | Rosenberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6044646 | Silverbrook | Apr 2000 | A |
6046726 | Keyson | Apr 2000 | A |
6057753 | Myers | May 2000 | A |
6078126 | Rollins et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088017 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088019 | Rosenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6104158 | Jacobus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160489 | Perry et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181318 | Lim | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184868 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198206 | Saarmaa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211861 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216059 | Ierymenko | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232697 | Mizumoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6256011 | Culver | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275213 | Tremblay et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
RE37374 | Roston et al. | Sep 2001 | E |
6285351 | Chang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307285 | Delson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317032 | Oishi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6414607 | Gonring et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422941 | Thorner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424333 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429849 | An et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433771 | Yocum et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437771 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456024 | Schmider et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6531998 | Gordon | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6585595 | Soma | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6639581 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6655211 | Schmid et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693516 | Hayward | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6693622 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697043 | Shahoian | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704001 | Schena et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717573 | Shahoian et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724128 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731270 | Tosaya | May 2004 | B2 |
6885876 | Aaltonen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6927756 | Hauck | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963762 | Kaaresoja et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7161580 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20010026264 | Rosenberg | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035722 | Audren et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020030663 | Tierling | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020070638 | Perkins | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080112 | Braun et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020142701 | Rosenberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159336 | Brown et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006892 | Church | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030067440 | Rank | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076298 | Rosenberg | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0349086 | Jan 1990 | EP |
1088741 | Oct 1967 | GB |
61032487 | Feb 1986 | JP |
H2-185278 | Jul 1990 | JP |
H4-8381 | Jan 1992 | JP |
H5-192449 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H7-24147 | Jan 1995 | JP |
09231000 | Sep 1997 | JP |
11009838 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2002044200 | Feb 2002 | JP |
WO 9200559 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9219018 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9308517 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 0039783 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0103105 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0113354 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0124158 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adelstein, B., et al., “Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipulandum for Manual Control research,” DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, ASMA, Jun. 1992, pp. 1-12. |
Aukstakalnis, S. et al., “Silicon Mirage: The Art and Science of Virtual Reality,” Berkeley, CA, Peach Pit Press, 1992, pp. 129-180. |
Baigre, S., “Electric Control Loading—A Low Cost, High Performance Alternative,” Proceedings of the 12th Interservice/Industry Training Systems Conference, Orlando, Florida, Nov. 1990, pp. 247-254. |
Bejczy, Antal K., et al., “Generalization of Bilateral Force-Reflecting Control of Manipulators,” Proceedings Of Fourth CISM—IFToMM Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Zaborow, Poland, Sep. 8-12, 1981, 14 pages. |
Bejczy, Antal K. et al., “Universal Computer Control System (UCCS) For Space Telerobots,” Proceedings 1987 IEEE International Conference On Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, 1987, pp. 318-324. |
Bejczy, A. K. et al., “A Laboratory Breadboard System for Dual-Arm Teleoperation,” Third Annual Workshop on Space Operations Automation and Robotics (Soar '89), Jul. 1989, 13 pages. |
Bejczy, A. K., “Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation,” Science, vol. 208, No. 4450, 1980, pp. 1327-1335. |
Bejczy, A. K. et al., “Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator,” International Computer Technology Conference, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 12-15, 1980, 9 pages. |
Bliss, J. C., “Optical-to-tactile Image Conversion for the Blind,” IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, vol. MMS-11, No. 1, 1970, pp. 58-65. |
Brooks et al., “Hand Controllers for Teleoperation—A State-of-the-Art Technology Survey and Evaluation,” JPL Publication 85-11; NASA-CR-175890; N85-28559, Mar. 1, 1985, pp. 1-84. |
Burder et al., “Distributed Virtual Force Feedback,” Lecture Notes for Workshopon Force Display in Virtual Environments and its Application to Robotic Teleoperation, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1993, pp. 25-44. |
Calder, B., “Design of a force-feedback touch-inducing actuator for teleoperator robot control,” Thesis (B.S.)—Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge, MA, 1983. |
Caldwell, D., et al, “Enhanced Tactile Feedback (Tele-Taction) Using a Multi-Functional Sensory System,” Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation: vol. 1, Atlanta, GA, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993, pp. 955-960. |
Lake, Sir Launcelot, “Cyberman from Logitech,” at http://www.ibiblio.org/GameBytes/Issue21/greviews/cyberman.html, 1994. |
Eberhardt, S. P. et al., “OMAR—A Haptic Display for Speech Perception by Deaf and Deaf-Blind Individuals,” IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Seattle, WA, Sep. 1993, pp. 195-201. |
Eberhardt, S. P. et al., “Inducing Dynamic Haptic Perception by the Hand: System Description and Some Results,” Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control, vol. DSC-55-1, No. 1, 1994, pp. 345-351. |
Gobel, M., et al., “Tactile Feedback Applied to Computer Mice,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1-24. |
Gotow, J.K. et al, “Controlled Impedance Test Apparatus for Studying Human Interpretation of Kinesthetic Feedback,” Proceedings of the 1989 American Control Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Jun. 21-23, 1989, pp. 332-337. |
Howe, R. D., “A Force-Reflecting Teleoperated Hand System for the Study of Tactile Sensing in Precision Manipulation,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, 1992, pp. 1321-1326. |
IBM Corporation, “Mouse Ball-Actuating Device with Force and Tactile Feedback,” vol. 32, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin No. 9B, Feb. 1990, pp. 230-235. |
Iwata, H., “Pen-based Haptic Virtual Environment,” in IEEE Annual Virtual Reality International Symposium, pp. 287-292, IEEE Service Center, (Seattle, WA, USA), 0-7803-1363-1/93 IEEE, 1993. |
Jackson, K. M., “Linearity of Radio-Frequency Transducers,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computer, vol. 15, Jul. 1977, pp. 446-449. |
Jacobsen, S.C. et al., “High Performance, Dextrous Telerobotic Manipulator With Force Reflection,” Intervention/ROV '91 Conference & Exposition, Hollywood, Florida, May 21-23, 1991, pp. 213-218. |
Johnson, D. A., “Shape-Memory Alloy Tactical Feedback Actuator,” Tini Allow Company, Inc., Aug. 1990, 2 pages, pp. i-33. |
Jones, L. et al., “A Perceptual Analysis of Stiffness,” Springer International, Experimental Brain Research, vol. 79, No. 1, 1990, pp. 151-156. |
Kaczmarek, K. A. et al. “Tactile Displays,” Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, Chapter 9 , New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 349-414. |
Kashani, R., “Tuned Mass Dampers and Vibration Absorbers,” www.deicon.com, downloaded Apr. 2006, pp. 1-5. |
Kontarinis, D., et al., “Display of High-Frequency Tactile Information to Teleoperators,” Telemanipulator Technology and Space Telerobotics, Won S. Kim, Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 2057, Sep. 7-9, 1993, pp. 40-50. |
Kontarinis, D., et al., “Tactile Display of Vibratory Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments,” PRESENCE, vol. 4, No. 4, 1995, pp. 387-402. |
Logitech Developer Support, “Logitech Cyberman SWIFT Supplement,” Cyberman Technical Specification, Revision: 1.0, Logitech Inc., Fremont, CA, Apr. 1994, pp. iii-29. |
Malatkar, P., “Nonlinear Vibrations of Cantilever Beams and Plates,” Dissertation to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jul. 2003, pp. 1-145. |
Marcus, B., “Touch Feedback in Surgery,” Official Proceedings of Virtual Reality and Medicine The Cutting Edge, Sep. 1994, pp. 96-97. |
McAffee, D. A. et al, “Teleoperator Subsystem/Telerobot Demonstrator: Force Reflecting Hand Controller Equipment Manual,” JPL D-5172, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, Jan. 1988, pp. 1-C36. |
Minsky, M., “Computational Haptics: The Sandpaper System for Synthesizing Texture for a Force-Feedback Display,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Jun. 1995. |
Noll, A., “Man-Machine Tactile,” SID Journal, The Official Journal of the Society for Information Display, vol. 1, No. 2, Jul./Aug. 1972, pp. 5-11, 30. |
Ouhyoung, M., et al., “The Development of A Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and Its Use in the Virtual Environment,” Proceedings of the Third Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Pacific Graphics, '95, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 21-24, 1995, pp. 309-319. |
Ouhyoung, M., “Force Display in Molecular Docking,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UMI Order No. 9034744, 1190, pp. 1-369. |
Ouhyoung, M. et al., “A Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and Its Use in PC Video Games,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 41, No. 3, Aug. 1995, pp. 787-794. |
Patrick, N., “Design, Construction, and Testing of a Fingertip Tactile Display for Interaction with Virtual and Remote Environments,” Master of Science Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Aug. 1990. |
Patrick, N. et al., “Design and Testing of A Non-reactive, Fingertip, Tactile Display for Interaction with Remote Environments,” Cooperative Intelligent Robotics in Space, Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 1387, 1990, pp. 215-222. |
Pimentel, K. et al., “Virtual Reality: Through The New Looking Glass,” McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, chapters 3-8, 1995, pp. 41-202. |
Rabinowitz, W.M. et al., “Multidimensional Tactile Displays: Identification of Vibratory Intensity, Frequency, and Contactor Area,” Journal of Acoustic Society of America, vol. 82, No. 4, Oct. 1987, pp. 1243-1252. |
Rosenberg, L. B., “Virtual Fixtures: Perceptual Overlays Enhance Operator Performance in Telepresence Tasks,” PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Aug. 1994, pp. ii-214. |
Russo, M. A., “The Design and Implementation of a Three Degree of Freedom Force Output Joystick,” Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, May 1990, pp. 1-131. |
Russo, M., et al., “Controlling Dissipative Magnetic Particle Brakes in Force Reflective Devices,” DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, ASME 1992, pp. 63-70. |
Technical Manual Overhaul Instructions With Parts Breakdown, Coaxial Control Shaker Part No. C-25502, Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, Revised Jul. 15, 1980, 23 pages. |
“Component Maintenance Manual with Illustrated Parts list, Coaxial Control Shaker Part No. C-25502,” Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, Revised Jan. 28, 2002, 3 pages. |
Scannell, T., “Taking a Joystick Ride,” vol. 9 Computer Currents No. 11, Boston Edition, Nov. 1994. |
Shimoga K., “Finger Force and Touch Feedback Issues in Dexterous Telemanipulation”, in: Proceedings Fourth Annual Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems for Space Exploration, Rensselaer Polytechnique Institute, Troy, NY, Sep. 30-Oct. 1, 1992, pp. 159-178. |
Snow et al., “Model-X Force-Reflecting-Hand-Controller”, NT Control No. NPO-17851; JPL Case No. 7348, Jun. 1989, pp. 1-4 with 25 pages of attachments. |
Stanley, M. et al., “Computer Simulation of Interacting Dynamic Mechanical Systems Using Distributed Memory Parallel Processors,” DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, ASME 1992, pp. 55-61. |
Tadros, A. H., “Control System Design for a Three Degree of Freedom Virtual Environment Simulator Using Motor/Brake Pair Actuators,” Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Feb. 1990, pp. 2-88. |
Terry, J. et al., “Tactile Feedback in a Computer Mouse”, in: Proceedings of Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, University of New Hampshire, Mar. 10-11, 1988, pp. 146-149. |
Voyles, R., et al., “Design of a Modular Tactile Sensor and Actuator Based on an Electrorheological Gel,” in: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, Apr. 1996, pp. 13-17. |
Wiker, S. F., “Teletouch Display Development: Phase 1 Report,” Naval Ocean Systems Center, Technical Report 1230, Jul. 1988, 66 pages. |
Yamakita, M. et al., “Tele Virtual Reality of Dynamic Mechanical Model,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Jul. 7-10, 1992, pp. 1103-1110. |
Korean Office Action in Korean Application No. 10-2004-7016973, dated Dec. 19, 2009. |
European Search Report in European Application No. 03724148, dated Mar. 5, 2010. |
Chinese Office Action in Chinese Application No. 03809339.1, Feb. 15, 2008. |
British Office Action in Great Britain Application No. GB0619155.5, dated Aug. 15, 2007. |
Japanese Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2004-500279, dated Sep. 17, 2008. |
Japanese Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2004-500279, dated Oct. 13, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/2005/007215, dated Jun. 28, 2005. |
International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US03/12389, Aug. 11, 2003. |
European Examination Report in European Application No. 03724148.6, dated Jun. 22, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080170037 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60375930 | Apr 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10792279 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 12075933 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10301809 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10792279 | US |