The subject matter described relates generally to the interfacing with computer and mechanical devices by a user, and more particularly to devices used to interface with computer systems and electronic devices and which provide haptic feedback to the user.
Humans interface with electronic and mechanical devices in a variety of applications, and the need for a more natural, easy-to-use, and informative interface is a constant concern. In the context, humans interface with computer devices for a variety of applications. One such application is interacting with computer-generated environments such as games, simulations, and application programs. Computer input devices such as mice and trackballs are often used to control a cursor within a graphical environment and provide input in these applications.
In some interface devices, force feedback or tactile feedback is also provided to the user, collectively known herein as “haptic feedback.” For example, haptic versions of joysticks, mice, gamepads, steering wheels, or other types of devices can output forces to the user based on events or interactions occurring within the graphical environment, such as in a game or other application program.
In portable computer or electronic devices, such as laptop computers, mice typically too large a workspace to be practical. As a result, more compact devices such as trackballs are often used. A more popular device for portable computers are “touchpads,” which are small rectangular, planar pads provided near the keyboard of the computer. The touchpads senses the location of a pointing object by any of a variety of sensing technologies, such as capacitive sensors or pressure sensors that detect pressure applied to the touchpad. The user contacts the touchpad most commonly with a fingertip and moves his or her finger on the pad to move, a cursor displayed in the graphical environment. In other embodiments, the user can operate a stylus in conjunction with the touchpad by pressing the stylus tip on the touchpad and moving the stylus.
One problem with existing touchpads is that there is no haptic feedback provided to the user. The user of a touchpad is therefore not able to experience haptic sensations that assist and inform the user of targeting and other control tasks within the graphical environment. The touchpads of the prior art also cannot take advantage of existing haptic-enabled software run on the portable computer.
An embodiment is directed to a haptic feedback planar touch control used to provide input to a computer system. The control can be a touchpad provided on a portable computer, or can be a touch screen found on a variety of devices. The haptic sensations output on the touch control enhance interactions and manipulations in a displayed graphical environment or when controlling an electronic device.
More specifically, the embodiment relates to a haptic feedback touch control for inputting signals to a computer and for outputting forces to a user of the touch control. The control includes a touch input device including an approximately planar touch surface operative to input a position signal to a processor of said computer based on a location of user contact on the touch surface. The computer positions a cursor in a graphical environment displayed on a display device based at least in part on the position signal. At least one actuator is also coupled to the touch input device and outputs a force on the touch input device to provide a haptic sensation to the user contacting the touch surface. The actuator outputs the force based on force information output by the processor to the actuator.
The touch input device can be a touchpad separate from a display screen of the computer, or can be included in a display screen of the computer as a touch screen. The touch input device can be integrated in a housing of the computer or handheld device, or provided in a housing that is separate from the computer. The user contacts the touch surface with a finger, a stylus, or other object. The force is preferably a linear force output approximately perpendicularly to a plane of the touch surface of the touch input device, and the actuator can include a piezo-electric actuator, a voice coil actuator, a pager motor, a solenoid, or other type of actuator. In one embodiment, the actuator is coupled between the touch input device and a grounded surface. In another embodiment, the actuator is coupled to an inertial mass, wherein said actuator outputs an inertial force on the touch input device approximately along an axis perpendicular to the planar touch surface. A touch device microprocessor separate from the main processor of the computer can receive force information from the host computer and provide control signals based on the force information to control the actuator.
The haptic sensations, such as a pulse, vibration, or spatial texture, are preferably output in accordance with an interaction of a controlled cursor with a graphical object in the graphical environment. For example, a pulse can be output when the cursor is moved between menu elements in a menu, moved over said icon, or moved over a hyperlink. The touch input device can include multiple different regions, where at least one of the regions provides the position signal and at least one other region provides a signal that is used by the computer to control a different function, such as rate control function of a value or a button press. Different regions and borders between regions can be associated with different haptic sensations.
An embodiment advantageously provides haptic feedback to a planar touch control device of a computer, such as a touchpad or touch screen. The haptic feedback can assist and inform the user of interactions and events within a graphical user interface or other environment and ease cursor targeting tasks. Furthermore, an embodiment allows portable computer devices having such touch controls to take advantage of existing haptic feedback enabled software. The haptic touch devices disclosed herein are also inexpensive, compact and consume low power, allowing them to be easily incorporated into a wide variety of portable and desktop computers and electronic devices.
These and other advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following specification and a study of the several figures of the drawing.
a and 8b are top plan and side cross sectional views, respectively, of a touch screen embodiment.
Computer 10 may include the various input and output devices as shown, including a display device 12 for outputting graphical images to the user, a keyboard 14 for providing character or toggle input from the user to the computer, and a touchpad 16. Display device 12 can be any of a variety of types of display devices; flat-panel displays are most common on portable computers. Display device 12 can display a graphical environment 18 based on application programs and/or operating systems that are running, such as a graphical user interface (GUI), that can include a cursor 20 that can be moved by user input, as well as windows 22, icons 24, and other graphical objects well known in GUI environments. Other devices may also be incorporated or coupled to the computer 10, such as storage devices (hard disk drive, DVD-ROM drive, etc.), network server or clients, game controllers, etc. In alternate embodiments, the computer 10 can take a wide variety of forms, including computing devices that rest on a tabletop or other surface, stand-up arcade game machines, other portable devices or devices worn on the person, handheld or used with a single hand of the user, etc. For example, host computer 10 can be a video game console, personal computer, workstation, a television “set top box” or a “network computer”, or other computing or electronic device.
Touchpad device 16 preferably appears externally to be similar to the touchpads of the prior art. Pad 16 includes a planar, rectangular smooth surface that can be positioned below the keyboard 14 on the housing of the computer 10, as shown, or may be positioned at other areas of the housing. When the user operates the computer 10, the user may conveniently place a fingertip or other object on the touchpad 16 and move the fingertip to correspondingly move cursor 20 in the graphical environment 18.
In operation, the touchpad 16 inputs coordinate data to the main microprocessor(s) of the computer 10 based on the sensed location of an object on (or near) the touchpad. As with many touchpads of the prior art, touchpad 16 can be capacitive, resistive, or use a different type of sensing. Some existing touchpad embodiments are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,521,336 and 5,943,044. Capacitive touchpads typically sense the location of an object on or near the surface of the touchpad based on capacitive coupling between capacitors in the touchpad and the object. Resistive touchpads are typically pressure-sensitive, detecting the pressure of a finger, stylus, or other object against the pad, where the pressure causes conductive layers, traces, switches, etc. in the pad to electrically connect. Some resistive or other types of touchpads can detect the amount of pressure applied by the user and can use the degree of pressure for proportional or variable input to the computer 10. Resistive touchpads typically are at least partially deformable, so that when a pressure is applied to a particular location, the conductors at that location are brought into electrical contact. Such deformability can be useful since it can potentially amplify the magnitude of output forces such as pulses or vibrations on the touchpad. Forces can be amplified if a tuned compliant suspension is provided between an actuator and the object that is moved, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,680,729. Capacitive touchpads and other types of touchpads that do not require significant contact pressure may be better suited in many embodiments, since excessive pressure on the touchpad may in some cases interfere with the motion of the touchpad for haptic feedback. Other types of sensing technologies can also be used in the touchpad. Herein, the term “touchpad” preferably includes the surface of the touchpad 16 as well as any sensing apparatus included in the touchpad unit.
Touchpad 16 preferably operates similarly to existing touchpads, where the speed of the fingertip on the touchpad correlates to the distance that the cursor is moved in the graphical environment. For example, if the user moves his or her finger quickly across the pad, the cursor is moved a greater distance than if the user moves the fingertip more slowly. If the user's finger reaches the edge of the touchpad before the cursor reaches a desired destination in that direction, then the user can simply move his or her finger off the touchpad, reposition the finger away from the edge, and continue moving the cursor. This is an “indexing” function similar to lifting a mouse off a surface to change the offset between mouse position and cursor. Furthermore, many touchpads can be provided with particular regions that are each assigned to particular functions that can be unrelated to cursor positioning. Such an embodiment is described in greater detail below with respect to
The touchpad 16 is provided with the ability to output haptic feedback such as tactile sensations to the user who is physically contacting the touchpad 16. Various embodiments detailing the structure of the haptic feedback touchpad are described in greater detail below. Preferably, the forces output on the touchpad are linear (or approximately linear) and oriented along the z-axis, approximately perpendicular to the surface of the touchpad 16 and the top surface of computer 10. In a different embodiment, forces can be applied to the touchpad 16 to cause side-to-side (e.g., x-y) motion of the pad in the plane of its surface in addition to or instead of z-axis motion, although such motion is not preferred.
Using one or more actuators coupled to the touchpad 16, a variety of haptic sensations can be output to the user who is contacting the pad. For example, jolts, vibrations (varying or constant amplitude), and textures can be output. Forces output on the pad can be at least in part based on the location of the finger on the pad or the state of a controlled object in the graphical environment of the host computer 10, and/or independent of finger position or object state. Such forces output on the touchpad 16 are considered “computer-controlled” since a microprocessor or other electronic controller is controlling the magnitude and/or direction of the force output of the actuator(s) using electronic signals. Preferably, the entire pad 16 is provided with haptic sensations as a single unitary member; in other embodiments, individually-moving portions of the pad can each be provided with its own haptic feedback actuator and related transmissions so that haptic sensations can be provided for only a particular portion. For example, some embodiments may include a touchpad having different portions that may be flexed or otherwise moved with respect to other portions of the pad.
In other embodiments, the touchpad 16 can be provided in a separate housing that is connected to a port of the computer 10 via a cable or via wireless transmission and which receives force information from and sends position information to the computer 10. For example, Universal Serial Bus (USB), Firewire, or a standard serial bus can connect such a touchpad to the computer 10. In such an embodiment, the computer 10 can be any desktop or stationary computer or device and need not be a portable device.
One or more buttons 26 can also be provided on the housing of the computer 10 to be used in conjunction with the touchpad 16. The user's hands have easy access to the buttons, each of which may be pressed by the user to provide a distinct input signal to the host computer 12. Typically, each button 26 corresponds to a similar button found on a mouse input device, so that a left button can be used to select a graphical object (click or double click), a right button can bring up a context menu, etc. In some embodiments, one or more of the buttons 26 can be provided with tactile feedback as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,184,868 and 6,563,487. Other features of these disclosures may also be used.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, one or more moveable portions 28 of the housing of the computer device 10 can be included which is contacted by the user when the user operates the touchpad 16 and which can provide haptic feedback. Having a moveable portion of a housing for haptic feedback is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,184,868 and 6,088,019. Thus, both the housing can provide haptic feedback (e.g., through the use of an eccentric rotating mass on a motor coupled to the housing) and the touchpad 16 can provide separate haptic feedback. This allows the host to control two different tactile sensations simultaneously to the user, for example, a vibration of a low frequency can be conveyed through the housing to the user and a higher frequency vibration can be conveyed to the user through the touchpad 16. Each other button or other control provided with haptic feedback can also provide tactile feedback independently from the other controls.
The host application program(s) and/or operating system preferably displays graphical images of the environment on display device 12. The software and environment running on the host computer 12 may be of a wide variety. For example, the host application program can be a word processor, spreadsheet, video or computer game, drawing program, operating system, graphical user interface, simulation, Web page or browser that implements HTML or VRML instructions, scientific analysis program, virtual reality training program or application, or other application program that utilizes input from the touchpad 16 and outputs force feedback commands to the touchpad 16. For example, many games and other application programs include force feedback functionality and may communicate with the touchpad 16 using a standard protocol/drivers such as I-Force®, FEELit®, or Touchsense™ available from Immersion Corporation of San Jose, Calif.
The touchpad 16 can include circuitry necessary to report control signals to the microprocessor of the host computer 10 and to process command signals from the host's microprocessor. For example, appropriate sensors (and related circuitry) are used to report the position of the user's finger on the touchpad 16. The touchpad device also includes circuitry that receives signals from the host and outputs tactile sensations in accordance with the host signals using one or more actuators. In some embodiments, a separate, local microprocessor can be provided for the touchpad 16 to both report touchpad sensor data to the host and/or to carry out force commands received from the host, such commands including, for example, the type of haptic sensation and parameters describing the commanded haptic sensation. Alternatively, the touchpad microprocessor can simply pass streamed data from the main processor to the actuators. The term “force information” can include both commands/parameters and streamed data. The touchpad microprocessor can implement haptic sensations independently after receiving a host command by controlling the touchpad actuators; or, the host processor can maintain a greater degree of control over the haptic sensations by controlling the actuators more directly. In other embodiments, logic circuitry such as state machines provided for the touchpad 16 can handle haptic sensations as directed by the host main processor. Architectures and control methods that can be used for reading sensor signals and providing haptic feedback for a device are described in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,734,373 and co-pending application Ser. Nos. 60/156,354, 60,133,208, 09/376,649, U.S. Pat. No. 6,639,581 and 60/160,401.
In one application, the controlled apparatus can be a computer system such as Web-TV from Microsoft Corp. or other computing device which displays a graphical user interface and/or web pages accessed over a network such as the Internet. The user can control the direction of the cursor by moving a finger (or other object) on the touchpad 16. The cursor can be used to select and/or manipulate icons, windows, menu items, graphical buttons, slider bars, scroll bars, or other graphical objects in a graphical user interface or desktop interface. The cursor can also be used to select and/or manipulate graphical objects on a web page, such as links, images, buttons, etc. Other force sensations associated with graphical objects are described below with reference to
The piezoelectric actuators 42 can each output a small pulse, vibration, or texture sensation on the touchpad 16 and to the user if the user is contacting the touchpad. The entire touchpad 16 is preferably moved with the forces output by actuator(s) 42. Preferably, the forces output on the touchpad are linear (or approximately linear) and along the z-axis, approximately perpendicular to the surface of the touchpad 16 and the top surface of computer 10. In a different embodiment, as mentioned above, forces can be applied to the touchpad 16 to cause side-to-side (e.g., x-y) motion of the pad in the plane of its surface in addition to or instead of z-axis motion. For example, one linear actuator can provide motion for the x-axis, and a second linear actuator can provide motion for the y-axis and/or the x-axis.
The frequency of a vibration output by an actuator 42 can be varied by providing different control signals to an actuator 42. Furthermore, the magnitude of a pulse or vibration can be controlled based on the applied control signal. If multiple actuators 42 are provided, a stronger vibration can be imparted on the touchpad by activating two or more actuators simultaneously. Furthermore, if an actuator is positioned at an extreme end of the touchpad and is the only actuator that is activated, the user may experience a stronger vibration on the side of the touchpad having the actuator than on the opposite side of the touchpad. Different magnitudes and localized effects can be obtained by activating some but not all of the actuators. Since the tip of a user's finger that is touching the pad is fairly sensitive, the output forces do not have to be of a high magnitude for the haptic sensation to be effective and compelling.
Besides using a finger to contact the touchpad, the user may also hold other objects that directly contact the touchpad. Any haptic sensations output on the pad can be transmitted through the held object to the user's hand. For example, the user can hold a stylus having a point that contacts the touchpad 16 more precisely than a finger. Other objects may also be used. In some embodiments, specialized objects can be used to enhance the haptic sensations. For example, a stylus or other object having a flexible portion or compliance may be able to magnify at least some of the touchpad haptic sensations as experienced by the user.
The piezoelectric actuators 42 have several advantages for the touchpad 16. These actuators can be made very thin and small, allowing their use in compact housings that are typical for portable electronic devices. They also require very low power, and are thus suitable for devices with limited power (e.g., powered by batteries). In some embodiments described herein, power for the actuators can be drawn off a bus connecting the computer to the touchpad (or touch screen). For example, if the touchpad 16 is provided in a separate housing, a Universal Serial Bus can connect the pad to the computer and provide power from the computer to the pad as well as data (e.g. streaming force data, force commands, etc.).
The touchpad 16 can be coupled only to the actuator 42, or can be additionally coupled to the housing of the computer device at other locations besides the actuators 42. Preferably the other couplings are compliant connections, using a material or element such as a spring or foam. If such connections are not made compliant, then the touchpad 16 itself preferably has some compliance to allow portions of the pad to move in response to actuator forces and to convey the haptic sensations to the user more effectively.
Since the touchpad 16 is directly coupled to the actuator 42, any produced forces are directly applied to the touchpad 16. The electric signal preferably is obtained from a microprocessor and any circuitry required to convert the microprocessor signal to an appropriate signal for use with the actuator 42.
An actuator 54 is also coupled to the touchpad 16 to impart forces on the touchpad and cause the touchpad 16 to move along the z-axis. In the present embodiment, actuator 54 is a linear voice coil actuator, where the moving portion (bobbin) of the actuator is directly coupled to the touchpad 16. The actuator 54 is grounded to the computer 10 housing and outputs a linear force on the touchpad 16 and thus drives the touchpad along the z-axis. A short pulse or jolt can be output, or the moving portion of the actuator can be oscillated to provide a vibration having a particular desired frequency. The springs 52 cause the touchpad 16 to return to a rest position after a force from the actuator causes the touchpad to move up or down. The springs can also provide a compliant suspension for the touchpad 16 and allow forces output by the actuator 54 to be amplified as explained above. Different types of spring elements can be used in other embodiments to couple the touchpad 16 to the rigid housing, such as leaf springs, foam, flexures, or other compliant materials.
In some embodiments, the user is able to push the touchpad 16 along the z-axis to provide additional input to the computer 10. For example, a sensor can be used to detect the position of the touchpad 16 along the z-axis, such as an optical sensor, magnetic sensor, Polhemus sensor, etc. The position on the z-axis can be used to provide proportional input to the computer, for example. In addition, other types of forces can be output along the z-axis, such as spring forces, damping forces, inertial forces, and other position-based forces, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,563,487. In addition, 3-D elevations can be simulated in the graphical environment by moving the pad to different elevations along the z-axis. If the pad 16 can be used as an analog input depending on the distance the entire pad is moved along the z-axis, and/or if kinesthetic (force) feedback is applied in the z-axis degree of freedom, then a greater range of motion for the pad 16 along the z-axis is desirable. An elastomeric layer can be provided if the touchpad 16 is able to be pressed by the user to close a switch and provide button or switch input to the computer 10 (e.g. using contact switches, optical switches, or the like). If such z-axis movement of the pad 16 is allowed, it is preferred that the z-axis movement require a relatively large amount of force to move the pad at least initially, since such z-axis movement may not be desired during normal use of the pad by the user.
The voice coil actuator 54 preferably includes a coil and a magnet, where a current is flowed through the coil and interacts with the magnetic field of the magnet to cause a force on the moving portion of the actuator (the coil or the magnet, depending on the implementation), as is well known to those skilled in the art and is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,868. Other types of actuators can also be used, such as a standard speaker, an E-core type actuator (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,704,001), a solenoid, a pager motor, a DC motor, moving magnet actuator (described in provisional application No. 60/133,208 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,704,001), or other type of actuator. Furthermore, the actuator can be positioned to output linear motion along an axis perpendicular to the z-axis or along another direction different from the z-axis (rotary or linear), where a mechanism converts such output motion to linear motion along the z-axis as is well known to those skilled in the art.
The touchpad 16 can also be integrated with an elastomeric layer and/or a printed circuit board in a sub-assembly, where one or more actuators are coupled to the printed circuit board to provide tactile sensations to the touchpad 16. Helical springs can also be provided to engage electrical contacts. Or, multiple voice coil actuators can be positioned at different locations under the touchpad 16. These embodiments are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,563,487. Any of the actuators described in that patent can also be used.
Touchpad 16 can be compliantly mounted to the rigid housing of the computer device similarly to the embodiments described above. For example, one or more spring elements 62 can be coupled between the touchpad and the housing. These springs can be helical or leaf springs, a compliant material such as rubber or foam, flexures, etc.
One or more actuators 64 are coupled to the underside of the touchpad 16. In the embodiment of
In different embodiments, other types of actuators can be used. For example, a linear voice coil actuator as described for
In the preferred linear force implementation, the direction or degree of freedom that the force is applied on the touchpad with respect to the inertial mass is important. If a significant component of the force is applied in the planar workspace of the touchpad (i.e., along the X or Y axis) with respect to the inertial mass, a short pulse or vibration can interfere with the user's object motion in one or both of those planar degrees of freedom and thereby impair the user's ability to accurately guide a controlled graphical object, such as a cursor, to a given target. Since a primary function of the touchpad is accurate targeting, a tactile sensation that distorts or impairs targeting, even mildly, is undesirable. To solve this problem, the touchpad device applies inertial forces substantially along the Z axis, orthogonal to the planar X and Y axes of the touchpad surface. In such a configuration, tactile sensations can be applied at a perceptually strong level for the user without impairing the ability to accurately position a user controlled graphical object in the X and Y axes of the screen. Furthermore, since the tactile sensations are directed in a third degree of freedom relative to the two-dimensional planar workspace and display screen, jolts or pulses output along the Z axis feel much more like three-dimensional bumps or divots to the user that come “out” or go “into” the screen, increasing the realism of the tactile sensations and creating a more compelling interaction. For example, an upwardly-directed pulse that is output when the cursor is moved over a window border creates the illusion that the user is moving a finger or other object “over” a bump at the window border.
The cursor control region 70 of the pad 16 can cause forces to be output on the pad based on interactions of the controlled cursor with the graphical environment and/or events in that environment. The user moves a finger or other object within region 70 to correspondingly move the cursor 20. Forces are preferably associated with the interactions of the cursor with displayed graphical objects. For example, a jolt or “pulse” sensation can be output, which is a single impulse of force that quickly rises to the desired magnitude and then is turned off or quickly decays back to zero or small magnitude. The touchpad 16 can be jolted in the z-axis to provide the pulse. A vibration sensation can also be output, which is a time-varying force that is typically periodic. The vibration can cause the touchpad 16 or portions thereof to oscillate back and forth on the z axis, and can be output by a host or local microprocessor to simulate a particular effect that is occurring in a host application.
Another type of force sensation that can be output on the touchpad 16 is a texture force. This type of force is similar to a pulse force, but depends on the position of the user's finger on the area of the touchpad and/or on the location of the cursor in the graphical environment. Thus, texture bumps are output depending on whether the cursor has moved over a location of a bump in a graphical object. This type of force is spatially-dependent, i.e. a force is output depending on the location of the cursor as it moves over a designated textured area; when the cursor is positioned between “bumps” of the texture, no force is output, and when the cursor moves over a bump, a force is output. This can be achieved by host control (e.g., the host sends the pulse signals as the cursor is dragged over the grating). In some embodiments, a separate touchpad microprocessor can be dedicated for haptic feedback with the touchpad, and the texture effect and be achieved using local control (e.g., the host sends a high level command with texture parameters and the sensation is directly controlled by the touchpad processor). In other cases a texture can be performed by presenting a vibration to a user, the vibration being dependent upon the current velocity of the user's finger (or other object) on the touchpad. When the finger is stationary, the vibration is deactivated; as the finger is moved faster, the frequency and magnitude of the vibration is increased. This sensation can be controlled locally by the touchpad processor (if present), or be controlled by the host. Local control by the pad processor may eliminate communication burden in some embodiments. Other spatial force sensations can also be output. In addition, any of the described force sensations herein can be output simultaneously or otherwise combined as desired.
Different types of graphical objects can be associated with tactile sensations. Tactile sensations can output on the touchpad 16 based on interaction between a cursor and a window. For example, a z-axis “bump” or pulse can be output on the touchpad to signal the user of the location of the cursor when the cursor is moved over a border of a window. When the cursor is moved within the window's borders, a texture force sensation can be output. The texture can be a series of bumps that are spatially arranged within the area of the window in a predefined pattern; when the cursor moves over a designated bump area, a bump force is output on the touchpad. A pulse or bump force can be output when the cursor is moved over a selectable object, such as a link in a displayed web page or an icon. A vibration can also be output to signify a graphical object which the cursor is currently positioned over. Furthermore, features of a document displaying in a window can also be associated with force sensations. For example, a pulse can be output on the touchpad when a page break in a document is scrolled past a particular area of the window. Page breaks or line breaks in a document can similarly be associated with force sensations such as bumps or vibrations.
Furthermore, a menu items in a displayed menu can be selected by the user after a menu heading or graphical button is selected. The individual menu items in the menu can be associated with forces. For example, vertical (z-axis) bumps or pulses can be output when the cursor is moved over the border between menu items. The sensations for certain menu choices can be stronger than others to indicate importance or frequency of use, i.e., the most used menu choices can be associated with higher-magnitude (stronger) pulses than the less used menu choices. Also, currently-disabled menu choices can have a weaker pulse, or no pulse, to indicate that the menu choice is not enabled at that time. Furthermore, when providing tiled menus in which a sub-menu is displayed after a particular menu element is selected, as in Microsoft Windows™, pulse sensations can be sent when a sub-menu is displayed. This can be very useful because users may not expect a sub-menu to be displayed when moving a cursor on a menu element. Icons can be associated with textures, pulses, and vibrations similarly to the windows described above. Drawing or CAD programs also have many features which can be associated with similar haptic sensations, such as displayed (or invisible) grid lines or dots, control points of a drawn object, etc.
In other related interactions, when a rate control or scrolling function is performed with the touchpad (through use of the cursor), a vibration can be displayed on the device to indicate that scrolling is in process. When reaching the end of a numerical range that is being adjusted (such as volume), a pulse can be output to indicate that the end of the range has been reached. Pulse sensations can be used to indicate the location of the “ticks” for discrete values or settings in the adjusted range. A pulse can also be output to inform the user when the center of the range is reached. Different strength pulses can also be used, larger strength indicating the more important ticks. In other instances, strength and/or frequency of a vibration can be correlated with the adjustment of a control to indicate current magnitude of the volume or other adjusted value. In other interactions, a vibration sensation can be used to indicate that a control function is active. Furthermore, in some cases a user performs a function, like selection or cutting or pasting a document, and there is a delay between the button press that commands the function and the execution of the function, due to processing delays or other delays. A pulse sensation can be used to indicate that the function (the cut or paste) has been executed.
Furthermore, the magnitude of output forces on the touchpad can depend on the event or interaction in the graphical environment. For example, the force pulse can be a different magnitude of force depending on the type of graphical object encountered by the cursor. For example, pulses of higher magnitude can be output when the cursor moves over windows, while pulses of lower magnitude can be output when the cursor moves over icons. The magnitude of the pulses can also depend on other characteristics of graphical objects, such as an active window as distinguished from a background window, file folder icons of different priorities designated by the user, icons for games as distinguished from icons for business applications, different menu items in a drop-down menu, etc. The user or developer can also preferably associate particular graphical objects with customized haptic sensations.
User-independent events can also be relayed to the user using haptic sensations on the touchpad. An event occurring within the graphical environment, such as an appointment reminder, receipt of email, explosion in a game, etc., can be signified using a vibration, pulse, or other time-based force. The force sensation can be varied to signify different events of the same type. For example, vibrations of different frequency can each be used to differentiate different events or different characteristics of events, such as particular users sending email, the priority of an event, or the initiation or conclusion of particular tasks (e.g. the downloading of a document or data over a network). When the host system is “thinking,” requiring the user to wait while a function is being performed or accessed (usually when a timer is displayed by the host) it is often a surprise when the function is complete. If the user takes his or her eyes off the screen, he or she may not be aware that the function is complete. A pulse sensation can be sent to indicate that the “thinking” is over.
A software designer may want to allow a user to be able to select options or a software function by positioning a cursor over an area on the screen using the touchpad, but not require pressing a physical button or tapping the touchpad to actually select the option. Currently, it is problematic to allow such selection because a user has physical confirmation of execution when pressing a physical button. A pulse sent to the touchpad can act as that physical confirmation without the user having to press a button or other control for selection. For example, a user can position a cursor over a web page element, and once the cursor is within the desired region for a given period of time, an associated function can be executed. This is indicated to the user through a tactile pulse sent to the pad 16.
The above-described force sensations can also be used in games or simulations. For example, a vibration can be output when a user-controlled racing car is driving on a dirt shoulder of a displayed road, a pulse can be output when the car collides with another object, and a varying-frequency vibration can be output when a vehicle engine starts and rumbles. The magnitude of pulses can be based on the severity of a collision or explosion, the size of the controlled graphical object or entity (and/or the size of a different graphical object/entity that is interacted with), etc. Force sensations can also be output based on user-independent events in the game or simulation, such as pulses when bullets are fired at the user's character.
The above haptic sensations can be similar to those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,243,078 and 6,211,861. Other control devices or grips that can include a touchpad 16 in its housing include a gamepad, mouse or trackball device for manipulating a cursor or other graphical objects in a computer-generated environment; or a pressure sphere or the like. For example, the touchpad 16 can be provided on the housing of a computer mouse to provide additional input to the host computer. Furthermore, selective disturbance filtering of forces, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,876, and shaping of force signals to drive the touchpad with impulse waves as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,613, can be used. Such impulses are also effective when driven with stored power in a battery on the computer 10 or from a bus such as USB connected to a host computer.
The touchpad 16 can also be provided with different control regions that provide separate input from the main cursor control region 70. In some embodiments, the different regions can be physically marked with lines, borders, or textures on the surface of the pad 16 (and/or sounds from the computer 10) so that the user can visually, audibly, and/or or tactilely tell which region he or she is contacting on the pad.
For example, scroll or rate control regions 72a and 72b can be used to provide input to perform a rate control task, such as scrolling documents, adjusting a value (such as audio volume, speaker balance, monitor display brightness, etc.), or panning/tilting the view in a game or virtual reality simulation. Region 72a can be used by placing a finger (or other object) within the region, where the upper portion of the region will increase the value, scroll up, etc., and the lower portion of the region will decrease the value, scroll down, etc. In embodiments that can read the amount of pressure placed on the pad 16, the amount of pressure can directly control the rate of adjustment; e.g., a greater pressure will cause a document to scroll faster. The region 72b can similarly be used for horizontal (left/right) scrolling or rate control adjustment of a different value, view, etc.
Particular haptic effects can be associated with the control regions 72a and 72b. For example, when using the rate control region 72a or 72b, a vibration of a particular frequency can be output on the pad 16. In those embodiments having multiple actuators, an actuator placed directly under the region 72a or 72b can be activated to provide a more localized tactile sensation for the “active” (currently used) region. As a portion of a region 72a, 72b is pressed for rate control, pulses can be output on the pad (or region of the pad) to indicate when a page has scroll by, a particular value has passed, etc. A vibration can also be continually output while the user contacts the region 72a or 72b.
Other regions 74 can also be positioned on the touchpad 16. For example, each of regions 74 provides a small rectangular area, like a button, which the user can point to in order to initiate a function associated with the pointed-to region. The regions 74 can initiate such computer functions as running a program, opening or closing a window, going “forward” or “back” in a queue of web pages in a web browser, powering the computer 10 or initiating a “sleep” mode, checking mail, firing a gun in a game, cutting or pasting data from a buffer, selecting a font, etc. The regions 74 can duplicate functions and buttons provided in an application program or provide new, different functions.
Similarly to regions 72a, 72b, the regions 74 an each be associated with haptic sensations; for example, a region 74 can provide a pulse sensation when it has been selected by the user, providing instant feedback that the function has been selected. Furthermore, the same types of regions can be associated with similar-feeling haptic sensations. For example, each word processor related region 74 can, when pointed to, cause a pulse of a particular strength, while each game-related region can provide a pulse of different strength or a vibration. Furthermore, when the user moves the pointing object from one region 72a, 72b or 74 to another, a haptic sensation (such as a pulse) can be output on the pad 16 to signify that a region border has been crossed.
In addition, the regions are preferably programmable in size and shape as well as in the function with which they are associated. Thus, the functions for regions 74 can change based on an active application program in the graphical environment and/or based on user preferences input to and/or stored on the computer 10. Preferably, the size and location of each of the regions can be adjusted by the user or by an application program, and any or all of the regions can be completely removed if desired. Furthermore, the user is preferably able to assign particular haptic sensations to particular areas or types of areas based on types of functions associated with those areas, as desired. Different haptic sensations can be designed in a tool such as Immersion Studio™ available from Immersion Corporation of San Jose, Calif.
It should be noted that the regions 72a, 72b and 74 need not be physical regions of the touchpad 16. That is, the entire touchpad 16 surface need merely provide coordinates of user contact to the processor of the computer and software on the computer can designate where different regions are located. The computer can interpret the coordinates and, based on the location of the user contact, can interpret the touchpad input signal as a cursor control signal or a different type of signal, such as rate control, button function, etc. The local touchpad microprocessor, if present, may alternatively interpret the function associated with the user contact location and report appropriate signal or data to the host processor (such as position coordinates or a button signal), thus keeping the host processor ignorant of the lower level processing. In other embodiments, the touchpad 16 can be physically designed to output different signals to the computer based on different regions marked on the touchpad surface that are contacted by the user; e.g. each region can be sensed by a different sensor or sensor array.
a and 8b′ are top plan and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of another computer device embodiment 80 including a form of the haptic touchpad 16. Device 80 is in the form of a portable computer device such as “personal digital assistant” (PDA), a “pen-based” computer, “electronic book”, or similar device (collectively known as a “personal digital assistant”or PDA herein). Those devices which allow a user to input information by touching a display screen or readout in some fashion are primarily relevant to this embodiment. Such devices can include the Palm Pilot from 3Com Corp., the Newton from Apple Computer, pocket-sized computer devices from Casio, Hewlett-Packard, or other manufacturers, cellular phones or pagers having touch screens, etc.
In one embodiment of a device 80, a display screen 82 typically covers a large portion of the surface of the computer device 80/ Screen 82 is preferably a flat-panel display as is well known to those skilled in the art and can display text, images, animations, etc.; in some embodiments screen 80 is as functional as any personal computer screen. Display screen 82 is preferably a “touch screen” that includes sensors which allow the user to input information to the computer device 80 by physically contacting the screen 80 (i.e. it is another form of planar “touch device”similar to the touchpad 16). For example, a transparent sensor film can be overlaid on the screen 80, where the film can detect pressure from an object contacting the film. The sensor devices for implementing touch screens are well known to those skilled in the art.
The user can select graphically-displayed buttons or other graphical objects by pressing a finger or a stylus to the screen 82 at the exact location where the graphical object is displayed. Furthermore, some embodiments allow the user to “draw” or “write” on the screen by displaying graphical “ink” images 85 at locations where the user has pressed a tip of a stylus, finger or other object. Handwritten characters can be recognized by software running on the device microprocessor as commands dada, or other input. In other embodiments, the user can provide input additionally or alternatively through voice recognition, where a microphone on the device inputs the users 's voice which is translated to appropriate commands or data by software running on the device. Physical buttons 84 can also be included in the housing of the device 80 to provide particular commands to the device 80 when the buttons are pressed. Many PDA's are characterized by the lack of a standard keyboard for character input from the user; rather, an alternative input mode is used, such as using a stylus to draw characters on the screen, voice recognition, etc. However, some PDA's also include a fully-functional keyboard as well as a touch screen, where the keyboard is typically much smaller than a standard-sized keyboard. In yet other embodiments, standard-size laptop computers with standard keyboards may include flat-panel touch-input display screens, and such screen (similar to screen 12 of
The touch screen 82 provides haptic feedback to the user similarly to the touchpad 16 described in previous embodiments. One or more actuators 86 be coupled to the underside of the touch screen 82 to provide haptic feedback such as pulse, vibrations, and texture; for example, an actuator 86 can be positioned near each corner of the screen 82, as shown in
As shown in
In the embodiments of touch input devices (touchpad and touch screen) described herein, it is also advantageous that contact of the user is detected by the touch input device. Since haptic feedback need only be output when the user is contacting the touch device, this detection allows haptic feedback to be stopped (actuators “turned off ”) when no objects are contacting the touch input device. This feature can conserve battery power for portable devices. If a local touch device microprocessor (or similar circuitry) is being used in the computer, such a microprocessor can turn off actuator output when no user contact is sensed, thus alleviating the host processor of additional computational burden.
While the subject matter has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments, it is contemplated that alterations, permutations, and equivalents thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and study of the drawing. For example, many different types of actuators can be used to output tactile sensations to the user. Furthermore, many of the features described in one embodiment can be used interchangeably with other embodiments. Furthermore, certain terminology has been used for the purposes of descriptive clarity, and not to be limiting.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/295,947 entitled “Haptic Feedback for Touchpads and Other Touch Controls,” filed Nov. 14, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/008,916 entitled “Haptic Feedback for Touchpads and Other Touch Controls,” filed Jan. 14, 2008 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,059,105, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/405,811 entitled “Haptic Feedback for Touchpads and Other Touch Controls,” filed Apr. 17, 2006 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,592,999, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/213,940 entitled “Haptic Feedback for Touchpads and Other Touch Controls,” filed Aug. 6, 2002 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,148,875, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/487,737 entitled “Haptic Feedback for Touchpads and Other Touch Controls,” filed Jan 19, 2000 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,429,846 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No 09/467,309 entitled “Haptic Feedback for Directional Control Pads,” filed Dec. 17, 1999 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,563,487.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2972140 | Hirsch | Feb 1961 | A |
3157853 | Hirsch | Nov 1964 | A |
3220121 | Cutler | Nov 1965 | A |
3497668 | Hirsch | Feb 1970 | A |
3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3623064 | Kagan | Nov 1971 | A |
3875488 | Crocker et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3902687 | Hightower | Sep 1975 | A |
3903614 | Diamond et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3911416 | Feder | Oct 1975 | A |
3919691 | Noll | Nov 1975 | A |
3923166 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4023290 | Josephson | May 1977 | A |
4101884 | Benton, Jr. | Jul 1978 | A |
4104603 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4108146 | Golden | Aug 1978 | A |
4108164 | Hall, Sr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4127752 | Lowthorp | Nov 1978 | A |
4160508 | Salisbury | Jul 1979 | A |
4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4242823 | Bruno | Jan 1981 | A |
4262549 | Schwellenbach | Apr 1981 | A |
4333070 | Barnes | Jun 1982 | A |
4334280 | McDonald | Jun 1982 | A |
4398889 | Lam et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4414537 | Grimes | Nov 1983 | A |
4414984 | Zarudiansky | Nov 1983 | A |
4436188 | Jones | Mar 1984 | A |
4464117 | Forest | Aug 1984 | A |
4477043 | Repperger | Oct 1984 | A |
4484179 | Kasday | Nov 1984 | A |
4484191 | Vavra | Nov 1984 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4542375 | Alles et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4545023 | Mizzi | Oct 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabusth | Oct 1985 | A |
4557275 | Dempsey, Jr. | Dec 1985 | A |
4560983 | Williams | Dec 1985 | A |
4581491 | Boothroyd | Apr 1986 | A |
4584625 | Kellogg | Apr 1986 | A |
4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4603284 | Perzley | Jul 1986 | A |
4604016 | Joyce | Aug 1986 | A |
4667182 | Murphy | May 1987 | A |
4689449 | Rosen | Aug 1987 | A |
4692756 | Clark | Sep 1987 | A |
4706294 | Ouchida | Nov 1987 | A |
4708656 | De Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
4715235 | Fukui et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4757453 | Nasiff | Jul 1988 | A |
4758165 | Tieman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763356 | Day, Jr. et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771344 | Fallacaro et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4772205 | Chlumsky et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4782327 | Kley et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4791416 | Adler | Dec 1988 | A |
4794384 | Jackson | Dec 1988 | A |
4794392 | Selinko | Dec 1988 | A |
4795296 | Jau | Jan 1989 | A |
4800721 | Cemenska et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4821030 | Batson et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823634 | Culver | Apr 1989 | A |
4837734 | Ichikawa et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4839634 | More et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4839838 | Labiche et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851820 | Fernandez | Jul 1989 | A |
4853874 | Iwamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4861269 | Meenen, Jr. | Aug 1989 | A |
4868549 | Affinito et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871992 | Peterson | Oct 1989 | A |
4885565 | Embach | Dec 1989 | A |
4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
4896554 | Culver | Jan 1990 | A |
4906843 | Jones et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4914624 | Dunthorn | Apr 1990 | A |
4926879 | Sevrain et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
4935728 | Kley | Jun 1990 | A |
4949119 | Moncrief et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4961038 | MacMinn | Oct 1990 | A |
4977298 | Fujiyama | Dec 1990 | A |
4983901 | Lehmer | Jan 1991 | A |
5004391 | Burdea | Apr 1991 | A |
5007300 | Siva | Apr 1991 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5022384 | Freels | Jun 1991 | A |
5022407 | Horch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035242 | Franklin | Jul 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5044956 | Behensky et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5065145 | Purcell | Nov 1991 | A |
5076517 | Ferranti et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078152 | Bond | Jan 1992 | A |
5095303 | Clark et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103404 | McIntosh | Apr 1992 | A |
5107080 | Rosen | Apr 1992 | A |
5107262 | Cadoz et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116180 | Fung et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121091 | Fujiyama | Jun 1992 | A |
5133076 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139261 | Openiano | Aug 1992 | A |
5143505 | Burdea et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5146566 | Hollis, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5159159 | Asher | Oct 1992 | A |
5165897 | Johnson | Nov 1992 | A |
5172092 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175459 | Danial et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184319 | Kramer | Feb 1993 | A |
5184868 | Nishiyama | Feb 1993 | A |
5185561 | Good et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186629 | Rohen | Feb 1993 | A |
5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5189355 | Larkins et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5193963 | McAffee et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197003 | Moncrief et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203563 | Loper, III | Apr 1993 | A |
5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
5220260 | Schuler | Jun 1993 | A |
5223658 | Suzuki | Jun 1993 | A |
5223776 | Radke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235868 | Culver | Aug 1993 | A |
5237327 | Saitoh et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5262777 | Low et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5264768 | Gregory et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270710 | Gaultier et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271290 | Fischer | Dec 1993 | A |
5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
5275565 | Moncrief | Jan 1994 | A |
5283970 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5286203 | Fuller et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296871 | Paley | Mar 1994 | A |
5299810 | Pierce | Apr 1994 | A |
5302132 | Corder | Apr 1994 | A |
5309140 | Everett | May 1994 | A |
5313230 | Venolia et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316017 | Edwards et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
5341459 | Backes | Aug 1994 | A |
5354162 | Burdea et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355148 | Anderson | Oct 1994 | A |
5376948 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381080 | Schnell et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389849 | Asano et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5389865 | Jacobus et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396266 | Brimhall | Mar 1995 | A |
5398044 | Hill | Mar 1995 | A |
5399091 | Mitsumoto | Mar 1995 | A |
5405152 | Katanics et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414337 | Schuler | May 1995 | A |
5422656 | Allard et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432531 | Calder et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436622 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437607 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5450613 | Takahara et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451924 | Massimino et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457479 | Cheng | Oct 1995 | A |
5459382 | Jacobus et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461711 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466213 | Hogan | Nov 1995 | A |
5471571 | Smith et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473235 | Lance et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5473344 | Bacon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5491477 | Clark et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5506605 | Paley | Apr 1996 | A |
5512919 | Araki | Apr 1996 | A |
5513100 | Parker et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521336 | Buchanan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530455 | Gillick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5542672 | Meredith | Aug 1996 | A |
5547382 | Yamaski | Aug 1996 | A |
5557365 | Ohsawa | Sep 1996 | A |
5562707 | Prochazka et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563632 | Roberts | Oct 1996 | A |
5565887 | McCambridge et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575761 | Hajianpour | Nov 1996 | A |
5576727 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577981 | Jarvik | Nov 1996 | A |
5580251 | Gilkes et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5581243 | Ouelette et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583407 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1996 | A |
5587937 | Massie et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589828 | Armstrong | Dec 1996 | A |
5589854 | Tsai | Dec 1996 | A |
5591082 | Jensen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596347 | Robertson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600777 | Wang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615384 | Allard et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619180 | Massimino et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625576 | Massie et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629594 | Jacobus et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638060 | Kataoka et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642469 | Hannaford et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643087 | Marcus et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5644516 | Podwalny et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656901 | Kurita | Aug 1997 | A |
5666138 | Culver | Sep 1997 | A |
5666473 | Wallace | Sep 1997 | A |
5670755 | Kwon | Sep 1997 | A |
5684722 | Thorner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691747 | Amano | Nov 1997 | A |
5691898 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694013 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699059 | Hiller | Dec 1997 | A |
5709219 | Chen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714978 | Yamanaka | Feb 1998 | A |
5719561 | Gonzales | Feb 1998 | A |
5721566 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724106 | Autry et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724278 | Ohgose et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729249 | Yasutake | Mar 1998 | A |
5731804 | Rosenberg | Mar 1998 | A |
5732347 | Bartle et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734373 | Rosenberg | Mar 1998 | A |
5736978 | Hasser et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739811 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742278 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745715 | Pickover et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748185 | Stephan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754023 | Roston et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755577 | Gillio | May 1998 | A |
5757358 | Osga | May 1998 | A |
5760764 | Martinelli | Jun 1998 | A |
5766016 | Sinclair | Jun 1998 | A |
5767457 | Gerpheide et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767839 | Rosenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771037 | Jackson | Jun 1998 | A |
5774069 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777991 | Adachi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781172 | Engel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784052 | Keyson | Jul 1998 | A |
5785630 | Bobick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790108 | Salcudean | Aug 1998 | A |
5791992 | Crump et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802353 | Avila et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804780 | Bartha | Sep 1998 | A |
5805140 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805165 | Thorne, III et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805416 | Friend et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805601 | Takeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808601 | Leah et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808603 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
5815142 | Allard et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821921 | Osborn et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823876 | Unbehand | Oct 1998 | A |
5825308 | Rosenberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5828197 | Martin | Oct 1998 | A |
5828364 | Siddiqui | Oct 1998 | A |
5831408 | Jacobus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832386 | Nojima et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835080 | Beetson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844392 | Peurach et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844506 | Binstead | Dec 1998 | A |
5877748 | Redlich | Mar 1999 | A |
5880714 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884029 | Brush, II et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887995 | Holehan | Mar 1999 | A |
5889236 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889670 | Schuler et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896125 | Niedzwiecki | Apr 1999 | A |
5897437 | Nishiumi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898364 | Gotou | Apr 1999 | A |
5903257 | Nishiumi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907615 | Kaschke | May 1999 | A |
5912661 | Siddiqui | Jun 1999 | A |
5914705 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914708 | Legrange et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917906 | Thronton | Jun 1999 | A |
5929846 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942733 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943044 | Martintelli et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944151 | Jakobs et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953413 | Peyer et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956016 | Kuenzner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959613 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973670 | Barber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973689 | Gallery | Oct 1999 | A |
5977867 | Blouin | Nov 1999 | A |
5982304 | Selker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982352 | Pryor | Nov 1999 | A |
5984785 | Takeda et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986643 | Harvill et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988902 | Holehan | Nov 1999 | A |
5990869 | Kubica et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999168 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001014 | Ogata et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004134 | Marcus et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005551 | Osborne et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008800 | Pryor | Dec 1999 | A |
6018711 | French-St George | Jan 2000 | A |
6020876 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024576 | Bevirt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028531 | Wanderlich | Feb 2000 | A |
6028593 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037927 | Rosenberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6039258 | Durbin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061004 | Rosenberg | May 2000 | A |
6067081 | Hahlganss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071194 | Sanderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6072475 | Van Ketwich et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081536 | Gorssuch et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084587 | Tarr et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088017 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088019 | Rosenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6094565 | Alberth et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100874 | Schena et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102803 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107997 | Ure | Aug 2000 | A |
6110130 | Kramer | Aug 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118435 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125264 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125385 | Wies et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128006 | Rosenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6131097 | Peurach et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140987 | Stein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147422 | Delson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147674 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151332 | Gorsuch et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154201 | Levin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160489 | Perry et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161126 | Wies et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166723 | Schena et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169540 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171191 | Ogata et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177881 | Castaneda et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178157 | Berg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184868 | Shahoian | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198206 | Saarmaa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215778 | Lomp et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218966 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219032 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219034 | Elbing et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236647 | Amalfitano | May 2001 | B1 |
6239790 | Martintelli et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243080 | Molne | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262717 | Donohue et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262718 | Findlay et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292174 | Mallet et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300936 | Braun et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307465 | Kayma et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326901 | Gonzales | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332075 | Verdonk | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335726 | Ilan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337678 | Fish | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359550 | Brisebois et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373463 | Beeks | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388655 | Leung | May 2002 | B1 |
6388999 | Gorsuch et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411198 | Hirai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411276 | Braun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414674 | Kamper et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415138 | Sirola et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6418323 | Bright et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422941 | Thorner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424356 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6433771 | Yocum et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435794 | Springer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438390 | Awan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438392 | Toba | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441599 | Kropidlowski | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445284 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447069 | Terris et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448977 | Braun et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469695 | White | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473069 | Gerpheide | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487421 | Hess et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496182 | Wong et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502754 | Bhatia et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509892 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518958 | Miyajima et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525749 | Moran et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529122 | Magnussen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535201 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563487 | Martin | May 2003 | B2 |
6574489 | Uriya | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590596 | Rector | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606508 | Becker et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610936 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626358 | Breimesser et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628195 | Coudon | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636197 | Goldenbert et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636202 | Ishmael, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639581 | Moore | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639582 | Shrader | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647145 | Gay | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671618 | Hoisko | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680729 | Shahoian et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690955 | Komiyama | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697043 | Shahoian | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6710518 | Morton et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723937 | Englemann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727916 | Ballard | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6792294 | Kushita | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6819922 | Janz | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822635 | Shahoian et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834373 | Dieberger | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850150 | Ronkainen | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6850781 | Goto | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859819 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6876847 | Kudoh | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882713 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885876 | Aaltonen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6940497 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944482 | Engstrom et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963839 | Osterman et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6982696 | Shahoian | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7009595 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061466 | Moore | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7096045 | Yoshinaga | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103389 | Shibata | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113177 | Franzen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127271 | Fuisaki | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7149208 | Mattaway et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151528 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159008 | Wies et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171191 | Olson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184765 | Birnie et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7215329 | Yoshikawa et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218310 | Tierling | May 2007 | B2 |
7225000 | Katayanagi | May 2007 | B2 |
7289796 | Kudoh | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292227 | Fukumoto et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312790 | Sato et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328020 | Masuda et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336260 | Martin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336977 | Katayanagi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7369115 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373120 | Messel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7424272 | Horiguchi | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7450110 | Shahoian et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463249 | Knowles et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7533342 | Vialle et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7548232 | Shahoian et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7728820 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7779166 | Grant et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010035854 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010036832 | McKay | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044328 | Tsukamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004704 | Nagatsuma et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012323 | Petite et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020039914 | Hama et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020044155 | Becker | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020107936 | Amon | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111737 | Hoisko | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130904 | Becker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020177471 | Kaaresoja | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193125 | Smith et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194246 | Moskowitz et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002682 | Smith et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006892 | Church | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016211 | Woolley | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022701 | Gupta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038776 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045266 | Staskal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048260 | Matusis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067440 | Rank | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071795 | Baldauf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076298 | Rosenberg | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078071 | Uchiyama | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095105 | Vaananen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030128191 | Strasser et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128192 | Van Os | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174121 | Poupyrev et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184574 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236729 | Epstein et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040059790 | Austin-Lane | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040067780 | Eiden | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040189484 | Li | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203656 | Andrew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204049 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219952 | Bernhart et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050048955 | Ring | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050134561 | Tierling et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060248183 | Barton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070229478 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080068350 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 23 863 | Jan 1995 | DE |
196 38 015 | Mar 1998 | DE |
19911416 | Nov 2000 | DE |
0062664 | Oct 1982 | EP |
0085518 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0265011 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0349086 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0607580 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0626634 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0556999 | May 1998 | EP |
0875819 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1182851 | Feb 2002 | EP |
2 308 082 | Apr 1997 | GB |
63-164127 | Oct 1988 | JP |
01-003664 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-109714 | Jan 1992 | JP |
05-020226 | Mar 1993 | JP |
04-007371 | Aug 1993 | JP |
06-018341 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06-139018 | May 1994 | JP |
06-265991 | Sep 1994 | JP |
05-193862 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07-064723 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07-113703 | May 1995 | JP |
07-266263 | Oct 1995 | JP |
U 2511577 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08-221173 | Aug 1996 | JP |
H8-204840 | Aug 1996 | JP |
09-167541 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10-105337 | Apr 1998 | JP |
H10-97526 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-506508 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-293644 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-004282 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-299305 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-085400 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-212725 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-338629 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001-350592 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-259059 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO 9200559 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9520788 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9532459 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9607965 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9628777 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9711448 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9712357 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9718546 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9720305 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9721160 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9731333 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9808159 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9824183 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9858323 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9940504 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0003319 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0021071 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0041788 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0203172 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0212991 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0227645 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0231807 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02059869 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02078810 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004052193 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053644 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053671 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053829 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053830 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adachi et al., “Sensory Evaluation of Virtual Haptic Push-Buttons,” 1994, Suzuki Motor Corp., pp. 1-7. |
Adelstein, “A Virtual Environment System For The Study of Human Arm Tremor,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Jun. 1989. |
Adelstein, “Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipulandum for Manual Control research,” DSC—vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, Edited by H. Kazerooni, pp. 1-12, 1992. |
Adelstein, et al., “A High Performance Two-Degree-of-Freedom Kinesthetic Interface,” MIT, 1992, pp. 108-112. |
Akamatsu et al., “Multimodal Mouse: A Mouse-Type Device with Tactile and Force Display,” 1994, Presence vol. 3, pp. 73-80. |
Atkinson et al., “Computing with Feeling,”, Comput. & Graphics, vol. 2, 1977, pp. 97-103. |
Aukstakalnis et al., “Silicon Mirage: The Art and Science of Virtual Reality,” ISBN 0-938151-82-7, pp. 129-180, 1992. |
Baigrie, “Electric Control Loading—A Low Cost, High Performance Alternative,” Proceedings, pp. 247-254, Nov. 6-8, 1990. |
Batter et al., “Grope-1: A computer Display to the sense of Feel,” Proc IFIP Congress, 1971, pp. 759-763. |
Bejczy, “Generalization of Bilateral Force-Reflecting Control of Manipulators,” Proceedings Of Fourth CISM-IFToMM, Sep. 8-12, 1981. |
Bejczy, “Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation,” Science, vol. 208, No. 4450, pp. 1327-1335, 1980. |
Bejczy et al., “A Laboratory Breadboard System For Dual-Arm Teleoperation,” SOAR '89 Workshop, JSC, Houston, TX, Jul. 25-27, 1989. |
Bejczy et al., “Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator,” International Computer Technology Conference, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 12-15, 1980. |
Bejczy, et al., “Universal Computer Control System (UCCS) For Space Telerobots,” CH2413-3/87/0000/0318501.00 1987 IEEE, 1987. |
Bejezy et al., “The Phantom Robot: Predictive Displays for Teleoperation with Time Delay,” IEEE CH2876, Jan. 1990, pp. 546-550. |
Bliss, James C., “Optical-to-Tactile Image Conversion for the Blind,” IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, vol. MMS-11, No. 1, 1970, pp. 58-65. |
Bolanowski, S.J. et al., “Four Channels Mediate the Mechanical Aspects of Touch,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84 vol. 84 (5), Nov. 1988, pp. 1680-1694. |
Brooks et al., “Hand Controllers for Teleoperation—A State-of-the-Art Technology Survey and Evaluation,” JPL Publication 85-11; NASA-CR-175890; N85-28559, pp. 1-84, Mar. 1, 1985. |
Brooks, Jr. et al., “Project GROPE, Haptic Displays for Scientific Visualization,”, Computer Graphics, vol. 24, #4, 1990, pp. 177-184. |
Burdea et al., “Distributed Virtual Force Feedback, Lecture Notes for Workshop on Force Display in Virtual Environments and its Application to Robotic Teleoperation,” 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 25-44, May 2, 1993. |
Buttolo et al., “Pen-based force Display for Precision Manipulation in Virtual Environments,” IEEE 0-8186-7084-3, 1995, pp. 217-224. |
Calder, “Design of A Force-Feedback Touch-Introducing Actuator For Teleoperator Robot Control,” Bachelor of Science Thesis, MIT, Jun. 23, 1983. |
Caldwell et al., “Enhanced Tactile Feedback (Tele-Taction) Using a Multi-Functional Sensory System,” 1050-4729/93, pp. 955-960, 1993. |
Chang “Audio-Haptic Feedback in Mobile Phones”, Proceedings of AMC CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 2-7, 2005, Portland, Oregon, pp. 1264-1267, 2005. |
Colgate et al., “Implementation of Stiff Virtual Walls in Force-Reflecting Interfaces,” Northwestern University, IL, 1993., pp. 1-8. |
Dennerlein et al., “Vibrotactile Feedback for Industrial Telemanipulators,” 1997, Sixth Annual Symp. On Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Env. And Teleoperator Systems, ASME IMECE, Dallas, pp. 1-7. |
Dennerlein, Jack et al., “Commercialization of Vibrotactile Feedback for Telemanipulation and Virtual Environments,” 1997, Phase I Final Report for ONR Contract N00014-96-C-0325 (not published or publicly available). |
Durlach, Nathaniel I. et al, “Virtual Reality: Scientific and Technological Challenges”, National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1995 pp. 160-205. |
Eberhardt, Silvio P. et al., “Inducing Dynamic Haptic Perception by the Hand: System Description and Some Results,” Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control, vol. DSC-55-1, No. 1, 1994, pp. 345-351. |
Eberhardt, Silvio P. et al., “OMAR—A Haptic Display for Speech Perception by Deaf and Deaf-Blind Individuals,” IEEE 1993, pp. 195-201. |
Ellis et al., Design & Evaluation of a High-Performance Prototype Planar Haptic Interface, Dec. 1993, Advances in Robotics, 55-64. |
Erikson, Carl “Polygonal Simplificatin: An Overview”, Dept. of Computer Science, TR96-016 1996, pp. 1-32. |
Fischer, et al., “Specification and Design of Input Devices for Teleoperation,” IEEE CH2876, Jan. 1990, pp. 540-545. |
Fokumoto, “Active Click: Tactile Feedback For Touch Panels,” ACM CHI2001 Extended Abstracts, pp. 121-122, Apr. 2001. |
Frisken-Gibson, Sarah F. et al, “A 64-Solenoid, Four-Level Fingertip Search Display for the Blind,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-34, No. 12, Dec. 1987, pp. 963-965. |
Fukuhara et al, Voice Café: Conversation Support System in a Gourp, 2001, IOS Press, pp. 334 and 335. |
Gobel et al., “Tactile Feedback Applied to Computer Mice,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-24, 1995. |
Goldstein, Moise H. et al., “Tactile Aids for the Profoundly Deaf Child,” 77 J. Acoust. Soc. Am 77 (1), Jan. 1985, pp. 258-265. |
Gotow et al., “Perception of Mechanical Properties at the Man-Machine Interface,” IEEE CH2503-1, 1987, pp. 688-690. |
Hannaford et al., “Force-Feedback Cursor Control,” NASA Tech Briefs, vol. 13, No. 11, 1989, pp. 1-7. |
Hannaford et al., “Performance Evaluation of a 6-Axis Generalized Force-Reflecting Teleoperator,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 21, No. 3, 1991, pp. 621-623, 631-633. |
Hardman, Lynda et al “Do You Have the Time? Composition and Linking in Time-based Hypermedia”, Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference of Hypertext and Hypermedia, Feb. 1999, pp. 189-196. |
Hasser, C., “Tactile Feedback for a Force-Reflecting Haptic Display,” School of Eng., Univ. of Dayton, Dayton, OH, 1995, pp. 1-98. |
Hasser, C. et al., “Tactile Feedback with Adaptive Controller for a Force-Reflecting Haptic Display,” Parts 1 and 2, IEEE 0-7803-3131-1, 1996, pp. 526-533. |
Hirota et al., “Development of Surface Display,” IEEE 0-7803-1363-1, 1993, pp. 256-262. |
Howe, “A Force-Reflecting Teleoperated Hand System for the Study of Tactile Sensing in Precision Manipulation,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992. |
Howe et al., “Task Performance w/ a dextrous Teleoperated Hand System,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 1833, 1992, pp. 1-9. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Mouse Ball-Actuating Device With Force and Tactile Feedback,” vol. 32, No. 9B, Feb. 1990. |
Iwata, “Pen-based Haptic Virtual Environment,” 0-7803-1363-1/93 IEEE, pp. 287-292, 1993. |
Iwata, Hiroo, “Artificial Reality with Force-feedback: Development of Desktop Virtual Space with Compact Master Manipulator,” Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 165-170. |
Jackson, K. M., “Linerity of Radio-Frequency Transducers”, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computer, Jul. 1977, pp. 446-449. |
Jacobsen et al., “High Performance, Dextrous Telerobotic Manipulator With Force Reflection,” InterventiorVROV '91 Conference & Exposition, Hollywood, Florida, May 21-23, 1991. |
Johnson, David A., “Shape-Memory Alloy Tactile Feedback Actuator,” Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, AAMRL-TR-90-039, Aug. 1990. (Tini Allow Company, Inc., Aug. 1990, 2 pages, pp. i-33). |
Jones et al., “A perceptual analysis of stiffness,” ISSN 0014-4819 Springer International (Springer-Verlag); Experimental Brain Research, vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 150-156, 1990. |
Kaczmarek, K. A. et al. “Tactile Displays,” in: Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 349-414. |
Kaczmarek, Kurt A. et al, “Electrotactile and Vibrotactile Displays for Sensory Substitution Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, No. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 1-16. |
Kelley et al., “MagicMouse: Tactile and Kinesthetic Feedback in the Human-Computer Interface using an Electromagnetically Actuated Input/Output Device,” Oct. 19, 1993 University of British Columbia pp. 1-27. |
Kelley et al., “On the Development of a Force-Feedback Mouse and its Integration into a graphical user Interface,” Nov. 1994, Engineering Congress and Exhibition, pp. 1-8. |
Kilpatrick et al., “The Use of Kinesthetic Supplement in an Interactive Graphics System,” University of North Carolina, 1976, pp. 1-172. |
Kontarinis et al., “Display of High-Frequency Tactile Information to Teleoperators,” Telemanipulator Technology and Space Telerobotics, Won S. Kim, Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 2057, pp. 40-50, Sep. 7-9, 1993. |
Kontarinis et al., “Tactile Display of Vibratory Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments,” PRESENCE, 4(4):387-402, 1995. |
Kotoku, “A Predictive Display with Force Feedback and its Application to Remote Manipulation System with Transmission Time Delay,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. On Intelligent Robots and Systems, Jul. 1992. |
Kotoku, et al., “Environment Modeling for the Interactive Display (EMID) Used in Telerobotic Systems,” IEEE/RSJ Int'l Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nov. 1991, pp. 999-1004. |
Lake, “Cyberman from Logitech,” GameBytes, 1994. |
“Cyberman Technical Specification,” Logitech Cyberman SWIFT Supplement, Apr. 5, 1994. |
MacLean, Karon et al “An Architecture For Haptic Control Of Media,” in: The Proceedings of the ASMA Dynamic SySTEMS and Control Division: 1999 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Eighth Annual Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Nov. 14-19, 1999, pp. 1-10. |
Marcus, “Touch Feedback in Surgery,” Proceedings of Virtual Reality and Medicine The Cutting Edge, Sep. 8-11, 1994. |
McAffee et al, Teleoperator Subsystem/Telerobot Demonstrator: Force Reflecting Hand Controller Equipment Manual, JPL D-5172, pp. 1-50, A1-A36, B1-B5, C1-C36, Jan. 1988. |
Millman et al., “Design of a 4 Degree of Freedom Force-Reflecting Manipulandum with a Specified Force/Torque Workspace,” IEEE CH2969-4, 1991, pp. 1488-1493. |
Minsky, “Computational Haptics: The Sandpaper System for Synthesizing Texture for a Force-Feedback Display,” Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Jun. 1995. |
Minsky et al., “Feeling & Seeing:Issues in Force Display,” ACM089791-351-5, 1990, pp. 235-242, 270. |
Munch et al., “Intelligent Control for Haptic Displays,” Eurographics '96, vol. 15, No. 3, 1996, pp. 217-226. |
Noll, “Man-Machine Tactile,” SID Journal, Jul./Aug. 1972 Issue. |
Ouh-Young, “Force Display in Molecular Docking,” Order No. 9034744, p. 1-369, 1990. |
Ouh-Young, “A Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and Its Use in PC Video Games,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 41, No. 3, Aug. 1995. |
Ouh-Young et al., “The Development of A Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and Its Use in the Virtual Reality Environment,” Proceedings of the Third Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Pacific Graphics '95, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 21-24, 1995. |
Ouh-Young et al., “Creating an Illusion of Feel: Control Issues in Force Display,” Univ. of N. Carolina, 1989, pp. 1-14. |
Ouh-young, et al., Using a Manipulator for Force Display in Molecular Docking, IEEE CH2555, 1988, pp. 1824-1829. |
Patrick et al., “Design and Testing of A Non-reactive, Fingertip, Tactile Display for Interaction with Remote Environments,” Cooperative Intelligent Robotics in Space, Rui J. deFigueiredo et al., Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 1387, pp. 215-222, 1990. |
Patrick, “Design, Construction, and Testing of a Fingertip Tactile Display for Interaction with Virtual and Remote Environments,” Master of Science Thesis, MIT, Nov. 8, 1990. |
Payette et al., “Evaluation of a Force Feedback (Haptic) Computer Printing Device in Zero Gravity,” Oct. 17, 1996, ASME Dynamics Systems, vol. 58 pp. 547-553. |
Peine, W.J., “Tactile Shape Displays for Small Scale Shape Feedback,” http://www.hrl.harvard.eduk-peine/display. html, 1998, pp. 1-2. |
Pimentel et al., Virtual Reality: through the new looking glass, 2nd Edition; McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-050167-X, pp. 41-202, 1994. |
Rabinowitz, W. M. et al., “Multidimensional Tactile Displays: Identification of Vibratory Intensity, Frequency, and Contactor Area,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (4), Oct. 1987, pp. 1243-1252. |
Ramstein, Christophe, “Combining Haptic and Braille Technologies: Design Issues and Pilot Study,” Assets '96, 2nd Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, ACM SIGRAPH, Apr. 1996, pp. 37-44. |
Ramstein et al., “The Pantograph: A Large Workspace Haptic Device for a Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction,” Computer-Human Interaction, CHI 1994, pp. 1-3. |
Rosenberg, “Virtual Fixtures: Perceptual Overlays Enhance Operator Performance in Telepresence Tasks,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Jun. 1994. |
Rosenberg, L., “Virtual fixtures as tools to enhance operator performance in telepresence environments,” SPIE Manipulator Technology, 1993, pp. 1-12. |
Rosenberg et al., “A Force Feedback Programming Primer,” Immersion Corp., 1997, pp. 1-176. |
Rosenberg et al., “Commercially Viable force feedback Controller for Individuals with Neuromotor Disabilities,” Armstrong Laboratory, AL/CF-TR-1997-0016, 1996, pp. 1-33. |
Rosenberg et al., “Perceptual Decomposition of Virtual Haptic Surfaces,” Proc. IEEE Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1993, pp. 1-8. |
Rosenberg et al., “The use of force feedback to enhance graphical user interfaces,” Stereoscopic Displays & Virtual Reality Systems, 1996, pp. 243-248. |
Rosenberg, “Perceptual Design of a Virtual Rigid Surface Contact,” Armstrong Laboratory AL/CF-TR-1995-0029, 1993, pp. 1-45. |
Rosenberg, “Virtual Haptic Overlays Enhance Performance in Telepresence Tasks,” Dept. of Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ., 1994. |
Rosenberg, et al., “The Use of Force Feedback to Enhance Graphical User Interfaces,” Proc. SPIE 2653, 1996, pp. 243-248. |
Russo, “Controlling Dissipative Magnetic Particle Brakes in Force Reflective Devices,” DSC—vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, pp. 63-70, ASME 1992. |
Russo, “The Design and Implementation of a Three Degree of Freedom Force Output Joystick,” MIT Libraries Archives Aug. 14, 1990, pp. 1-131, May 1990. |
Scannell, “Taking a Joystick Ride,” Computer Currents, Boston Edition, vol. 9, No. 11, Nov. 1994. |
Schmult et al., “Application Areas for a Force-Feedback Joystick,” 1993, Advances in Robotics, vol. 49, pp. 47-54. |
“Component Maintenance Manual with Illustrated Parts List, Coaxial Shaker Part No. C-25502”, Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, Revised Jan. 28, 2002 (3 pages). |
“Technical Manual Overhaul Instructions With Parts Breakdown, Coaxial Control Shaker Part No. C-25502”, Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, revised Jul. 15, 1980 (23 pages). |
Safe Flight Instruments Corporation, Coaxial Control Shaker, Part No. C-25502, Jul. 1, 1967. |
Shimoga, “Finger Force and Touch Feedback Issues in Dexterous Telemanipulation,” Proceedings of Fourth Annual Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems for Space Exploration, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Sep. 30-Oct. 1, 1992. |
SMK Corporation, “Force Feedback Type Optical Touch Panel Developed,” SMK Corporation Website, Oct. 30, 2002. |
SMK Corporation, “Multi-Functional Touch Panel, Force-Feedback Type, Developed: A Touch Panel Providing a Clicking Feeling,” http://www.smk.co.jp/whatsnew—e/628csc—e.html, Sep. 30, 2002. |
Snibbe, Scott S., “Haptic Techniques for Media Control,” In Proceeding of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2001, pp. 1-10. |
Snow et al., “Model-X Force-Reflecting-Hand-Controller,” NT Control No. MPO-17851; JPL Case No. 5348, pp. 1-4, Jun. 15, 1989. |
Stanley et al., “Computer Simulation of Interacting Dynamic Mechanical Systems Using Distributed Memory Parallel Processors,” DSC—vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, pp. 55-61, ASME 1992. |
Tadros, “Control System Design for a Three Degree of Freedom Virtual Environment Simulator Using Motor/Brake Pair Actuators”, MIT Archive © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1-88, Feb. 1990. |
Tan et al., “Manual Resolution of Compliance When Work and Force Cues are Minimized,” DSC—vol. 49, Advances in Robotics, Mechatronics, and Haptic Interfaces, ASME 1993, pp. 99-104. |
Terry et al., “Tactile Feedback In A Computer Mouse,” Proceedings of Fourteenth Annual Northeast Broengineenng Conference, University of New Hampshire, Mar. 10-11, 1988. |
Wiker, “Teletouch Display Development: Phase 1 Report,” Technical Report 1230, Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, Apr. 17, 1989. |
Wiker, Steven F., “Teletouch Display Development: Phase 1 Report,” Naval Ocean Systems Center, Technical Report 1230, Jul. 1988, 66 pages. |
Wiker, Steven F. et al., “Development of Tactile Mice for Blind Access to Computers: Importance of Stimulation Locus, Object Size, and Vibrotactile Display Resolution,” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 1991, pp. 708-712. |
Winey III, “Computer Stimulated Visual & Tactile Feedback as an Aid to Manipulator & Vehicle Control,” MIT, 1981, pp. 1-79. |
Yamakita et al., “Tele-Virtual Reality of Dynamic Mechanical Model,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. On Intelligent Robots and Systems, Jul. 1992, pp. 1103-1110. |
Yokokoji, et al., “What You Can See is What You Can Feel—Development of a Visual/Haptic Interface to Virtual Environment,” Proc. VRAIS 1996. |
Yokokoji et al., “What you can see is what you can feel,” IEEE 0-8186-7295-1, 1996, pp. 46-54. |
Definition of “avatar”, 2001, Hargrave's Communications Dictionary. |
IPRP PCT/US2005/036861 mailed Feb. 23, 2006. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US03/038862 dated Apr. 12, 2004. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US03/038868 dated Sep. 27, 2004. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US03/038899 dated Apr. 19, 2004. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US03/038900 dated Apr. 14, 2004. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US03/038961 dated Apr. 5, 2004. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US06/35645—dated Jun. 23, 2008. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US06/45644 dated Sep. 13, 2007. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US09/041099 dated Jan. 2, 2002. |
ISR/WO—PCT/US2005/036861 mailed Feb. 23, 2006. |
Strietelmeier, J., “TaleVibes Review,” The Gadgeteer [online], Mar. 22, 1998 [retrieved on Jun. 13, 2014], Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://the-gadgeteer.com/1998/03/22/talevibes—review/>. |
Non-Final Office Action Issued for Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/012,470 dated Mar. 19, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action issued for Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/012,486 dated Apr. 2, 2013. |
Final Office Action Issued for Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/012,486 dated Aug. 29, 2013. |
“Issues and Techniques in Touch-Sensitive Tablet Input” published in 1985 by Buxton et al. |
“A New Concept Touch-Sensitive Display Enabling Vibro-Tactile Feedback” Proceedings of HCI' 98, pp. 303-312. |
“The Tactile Touchpad” by I. Scott MacKenzie et al., published in CHI 97, Mar. 22-27, 1997. |
“Philips Velo 1 with Microsoft Windows CD 2.0 User's Guide”, 1998. |
Apple Computer, Inc., Apple MessagePad Handbook (1995). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton Utilities (1995). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton 2.0 User Interface Guidelines (1996). |
Apple Computer, Inc., The NewtonScript Programming Language (1996). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton Programmer's Guide for Newton 2.0 (1996). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton OS 2.1 Engineering Documents (1996). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton Works Word Processor User's Manual (1997). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton Programmer's Guide 2.1 OS Addendum (1997). |
Apple Computer, Inc., Newton Toolkit User's Guide for Windows (1997). |
“Simon Says, Here is How”, Part No. 82G2557, 1994. |
“XView Programming Manual” by Dan Heller, ISBN 0-937175-87-0, published Nov. 1993. |
David Pogue, PalmPilot: The Ultimate Guide (O'Reilly Jun. 1998). |
3Com Corp., Handbook for the Palm III Organizer (1998). |
3Com Corp., Applications Handbook for the Palm III Organizer (1998). |
3Com Corp., PalmPilot Handbook (1997). |
StarTAC Wearable Cellular Phone User Guide (1996). |
David A Pinsky, StarTAC Press Release: Motorola Puts Communications in the Palm of Your Hand—Announces New StarTAC Wearable Cellular Telephone (Jan. 3, 1996). |
2000X User's Guide. |
Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 60/116,005 to S. Bhatia, dated Jan. 15, 1999. |
A New Concept Touch-Sensitive Display Enabling Vibro-Tactile Feedback by Masahiko Kawakami, et al. (IDEC Izumi Corp.) |
Chris De Herrera, The Everex Freestyle Palm-size PC, Handheld PC (Sep./Oct. 1998). |
Joe Hutsko, Miniature Pinball With Buzz, And a Bunch of Apes on the Run, New York Times (Jul. 1, 1999). |
Chi Kong Lui, Pokemon Pinball, GameCritics.com (Aug. 8, 1999). |
“Get a Hold of This Action,” authored by Denny Atkin, Computer Gaming World, Nov. 1996, at p. 257. |
“Force FX—The new force feedback joystick from CH Products,” CH Products, Inc. advertisement, Computer Gaming World, Nov. 1996, at p. 261. |
“Control Advancements Announces the Beta Release of Virtual Reality Mouse,” Canada NewsWire, Sep. 9, 1996. |
Dilascia, P., “Editor's Note”, Microsoft Systems Journal, Jul. 1995, 1 pg. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140002386 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13295947 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13747389 | US | |
Parent | 12008916 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 13295947 | US | |
Parent | 11405811 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12008916 | US | |
Parent | 10213940 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 11405811 | US | |
Parent | 09487737 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 10213940 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09467309 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09487737 | US |