Patent Grant
9197735
One embodiment is directed to electronic messaging. More particularly, one embodiment is directed to haptically enabled electronic messaging for mobile terminal devices.
Electronic device manufacturers strive to produce a rich interface for users. Conventional devices use visual and auditory cues to provide feedback to a user. In some interface devices, kinesthetic feedback (such as active and resistive force feedback) and/or tactile feedback (such as vibration, texture, and heat) is also provided to the user, more generally known collectively as “haptic feedback” or “haptic effects.” Haptic feedback can provide cues that enhance and simplify the user interface. Specifically, vibration effects, or vibrotactile haptic effects, may be useful in providing cues to users of electronic devices to alert the user to specific events, or provide realistic feedback to create greater sensory immersion within a simulated or virtual environment.
Haptic feedback has also been increasingly incorporated in portable electronic devices, referred to as “handheld devices” or “mobile terminal devices,” such as cellular telephones, personal digital assistants (“PDA”s), smart phones, and portable gaming devices. For example, some portable gaming applications are capable of vibrating in a manner similar to control devices (e.g., joysticks, etc.) used with larger-scale gaming systems that are configured to provide haptic feedback. Additionally, devices such as cellular telephones and PDAs are capable of providing various alerts to users by way of vibrations. For example, a cellular telephone can alert a user to an incoming telephone call by vibrating. Similarly, a PDA can alert a user to a scheduled calendar item or provide a user with a reminder for a “to do” list item or calendar appointment.
Many mobile terminal devices, in addition to handling voice telephone calls, allow for messaging between devices. Short Message Service (“SMS”), also known as text messaging, is a popular communication method that enables the exchange of short text messages between mobile terminal devices via the Short Message Service Centre (“SMSC”) in a mobile network. Other known messaging methods for mobile terminal devices include Multimedia Messaging Service (“MMS”), Mobile Instant Messaging, and Mobile Email. MMS is a store and forward messaging service that allows mobile subscribers to exchange multimedia messages with other mobile subscribers. As such, it can be seen as an evolution of SMS, with MMS supporting the transmission of additional media types, including text, picture, audio, video, or a combination of all four. Instant Messaging (“IM”) is an Internet Protocol (“IP”) based application that can provide real-time written communication between users of a computer. Mobile Instant Messaging is the ability to engage in Instant Messaging services from a mobile handset. Mobile IM allows users to address messages to other users using an alias (or user name) and address book, and incorporates the concept of presence, enabling the sender to know when his/her “buddies” are available. Mobile Email is the ability to send and receive e-mail over wireless devices.
Haptic feedback can be used to provide additional information that may not be apparent in the text of the message to the recipient of a message. For example, a text message sent to another user at a mobile terminal device may not include information indicating how strong the user feels about the topic expressed or other message subtext. Users can try to express this subtext using well-known icons or symbols known as “emoticons,” which are culturally dependent iconic representations of emotions or messages. For example, a “smiley” emoticon to indicate a humorous message may be expressed as a colon and right parenthesis mark, “:)”, which resembles a face smiling when viewed from the side, or may also be expressed as a combination of parenthesis, carets, and an underline “(^_^)”. Variations of the smiley emoticon can express a variety of other emotions. However, emoticons and symbols are limited in the complexity of the messages they can convey.
One embodiment of the present invention is a mobile terminal device that receives a haptically enabled message that includes text and at least one haptic feedback command. The device determines the timing of the haptic feedback command within the message. When the device receives an indication that the message is being displayed by a user, the device synchronizes a haptic effect corresponding to the haptic feedback command. The synchronizing is based on the timing and the indication.
One embodiment is a mobile terminal device that can generate and receive haptically enabled messages. When a user reads the message, the haptic content of the message is synchronized with the textual content to enhance the effectiveness of the message.
Haptic feedback embedded in messages, in contrast to emoticons, can offer much more complex and direct ways to express subtext to other users in a more effective manner. Haptic feedback can be used to emphasize information that is contained in the text of the message to the recipient of a message. For example, a text message sent to a user at a mobile terminal device may indicate that gasoline prices are about to rise in their area by a certain amount of money. Haptic feedback embedded in the message can convey to the user the amount of the price differential, enabling the user to understand the meaning of the message without reading the text.
The haptic feedback system includes a processor 12. Coupled to processor 12 is a memory 20 and an actuator drive circuit 16, which is coupled to a vibration actuator 18. Although the embodiment of
Processor 12 may be any type of general purpose controller or processor, or could be a processor specifically designed to provide haptic effects, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”). Processor 12 may be the same controller/processor that operates the entire telephone 10, or may be a separate processor. Processor 12 can decide what haptic effects are to be played and the order in which the effects are played based on high level parameters. In general, the high level parameters that define a particular haptic effect include magnitude, frequency and duration.
Processor 12 outputs the control signals to drive circuit 16 which includes electronic components and circuitry used to supply actuator 18 with the required electrical current and voltage to cause the desired haptic effects. Actuator 18 is a haptic device that generates a vibration on telephone 10. Actuator 18 can include one or more force applying mechanisms which are capable of applying a vibrotactile force to a user of telephone 10 (e.g., via the housing of telephone 10). Actuator 18 may be, for example, an electromagnetic actuator such as an Eccentric Rotating Mass (“ERM”) in which an eccentric mass is moved by a motor, a Linear Resonant Actuator (“LRA”) in which a mass attached to a spring is driven back and forth, or a “smart material” such as piezoelectric, electro-active polymers or shape memory alloys. Memory 20 can be any type of storage device, such as random access memory (“RAM”) or read-only memory (“ROM”). Memory 20 stores instructions executed by processor 12. Memory 20 may also be located internal to processor 12, or any combination of internal and external memory. In one embodiment, the haptic feedback system may further include an accelerometer (not shown) that measures the acceleration of telephone 10.
Memory 20 further stores instructions that when executed by processor 12 allow a user at telephone 10 to create haptically enabled messages that include haptic content, and to read received haptically enabled messages so that the haptic content is synchronized with the textual content of the messages. In one embodiment, a mobile browser is used to create and read haptically enabled messages.
In one embodiment, a user will create a haptically enabled message on telephone 10 by selecting from a list of icons, commands, codes, emoticon, etc. (collectively, “haptic feedback commands”) for designating a haptic feedback. Each haptic feedback may be mapped to specific haptic code that when executed by processor 12 causes the haptic feedback system to generate the specified haptic feedback effect.
For example, a smiley icon, emoticon or command (e.g., :), (^_^), or <smiley>) can be selected by the user and inserted within the text of an SMS message. The haptic feedback command, when received by the recipient, will create the mapped haptic feedback effect at the user's mobile terminal device. The haptic feedback effect will be related to the type of haptic command. For example, a “pat” effect may generate haptic feedback implementing a small, smooth jolt to the grip or user object of the recipient user's mobile termination device, like a pat of a hand. The “giggle” effect may provide a low-frequency vibration, the “slap” effect may provide a sharp, high magnitude jolt, and the “smile” effect may provide a slow side-to-side motion, etc.
In one embodiment, the user can insert haptic content into the message or pre-assign specific key words, phrases or emoticons with haptic effects. Groups of emoticons can also be tagged and a single haptic effect attached to them. For example, all emoticons associated with “happy” sentiments can be assigned to the same category and have the same haptic effect. In one embodiment, haptic effects can be default assigned to emoticons, key words or phrases. In another embodiment, an invisible command can be inserted in the message so the recipient will not be able to visually anticipate a haptic effect when the message is read.
In one embodiment, telephone 10 allows the user to feel the haptic effect as they are entering the text. In this embodiment, as the user is authoring the message, the haptic feedback can be played back on the device in order for the sender to know what haptic effect is being sent.
One embodiment uses gestures to create haptically enabled messages.
While inputting text for purposes of creating a message, a user may input a haptic effect through gestures by, for example, moving telephone 10 in a certain fashion that is then mapped to a haptic effect. For example, if the user wishes to express contentment with a message the telephone could be gently rocked back and forth. At 202, the rocking generates an accelerometer output. At 204, processor 12 receives the accelerometer output and maps it to a predetermined haptic effect and corresponding haptic feedback command. For example, the gentle rocking, which would generate relatively low frequency low magnitude accelerations, could be mapped to a smooth low frequency haptic effect. If the user were angry the phone could be shaken up and down with a fast motion, which could be mapped to a haptic effect that is of high intensity and high frequency. At 206, processor 12 inserts the haptic feedback command that corresponds to the haptic effect and inserts it into the text message at the appropriate portion (e.g., at the point of the text message that corresponds to when the user initiated the gesture).
In another embodiment, the haptically enabled message can be generated using voice recognition software. The voice recognition software can tie voice commands to user generated haptic effects. Various aspects of the voice input can be used to map haptic effects such as word commands (e.g., strong, short, short), voice emphasis (e.g., tone of voice) or noises created by the user such as jazz-scat or beat boxing. In another embodiment, gestures can be generated through a video camera input or an input of a user's interface with a touchscreen.
When a user at telephone 10 receives a message, an alert that a new message has been received will typically be displayed to the user on, for example, screen 11. The user will then select the desired message to view. In one embodiment, where the message is a haptically enabled message, there is a need for the playing or initiation of the haptic content to be synchronized or correspond to the textual content of the message.
In another embodiment, haptic content is played when the new message alert is received. The haptic alert can indicate the nature of the content of the message, for example the haptic feedback command contained in the message. Or the haptic alert can identify the message sender or the urgency of the message. In such case the style of the haptic alert may be user configurable.
At 306, for each haptic feedback command and based on the location determined at 304, a time delay for initiating the corresponding haptic effect is determined. The time delay may be a delay from the time that the message is opened by the user.
At 308, when the user opens the message or otherwise accesses the message so it can be read on telephone 10, an indication is received that the message has been opened by the user. At 310, each haptic feedback is initiated based on the determined time delay which is the delay from the time that the message was opened by the user. Therefore, each haptic content is synchronized to the textual content.
For example, the haptically enabled message may include the following:
Where the smiley and sad icons are associated with haptic feedback commands. Based on the functionality of would first be initiated after an initial pause based on the number of characters or words before the
and then the haptic feedback corresponding to the
would be initiated after an initial pause based on the number of characters or words before the
and after the
In other embodiments, some characters would be given more or less amount of pause time, and some other portions of the message may be given consideration in determining the amount of pause time, such as the amount of spaces or new lines
Other embodiments use criteria other than text length and the location of the haptic feedback command within the text in order to synchronize the haptic content with text content. In one embodiment, a determination of when the user or the device is scrolling the text or otherwise advancing the text can be used as a cue for initiating haptic feedback. In another embodiment, an estimate of the user's reading speed can be used to time haptic feedback initiation. A user's reading speed may be measured to obtain this estimate and use that for the timing of the haptic feedback content. For example a user could read one or two test messages and press a button when complete.
In an embodiment where the text includes multimedia content, such as audio and video in an MMS message, the haptic feedback initiation can be coordinated with the timing of the multimedia events.
In a message that includes a high number of haptic feedback commands, one embodiment establishes a precedence order for haptic effects or may even triage effects. For example, if many emoticons were in succession in the text, a decision could be made as to which emoticon would result in haptic effects and which would be ignored.
In one embodiment, haptic effects in haptically enabled messages can be automatically generated when the message is composed. The text of the message can be parsed and the appropriate haptic effect and corresponding haptic feedback command can be automatically inserted. The appropriate haptic effect can be based on, for example, words, phrases, emoticons, punctuation, or the inferred context on the message.
Several embodiments disclosed are specifically illustrated and/or described herein. However, it will be appreciated that modifications and variations are covered by the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.
For example, some embodiments disclosed above are implemented in a cellular telephone, which is an object that can be grasped, gripped or otherwise physically contacted and manipulated by a user. As such, the present invention can be employed on other haptics enabled input and/or output devices that can be similarly manipulated by the user. Such other devices can include a touch screen (Global Positioning System (“GPS”) navigator screen on an automobile, an automated teller machine (“ATM”) display screen), a remote for controlling electronics equipment (audio/video, garage door, home security, etc.) and a gaming controller Uoystick, mouse, specialized controller, gamepad, etc.). The operation of such input and/or output devices is well known to those skilled in the art. Further, embodiments can be implemented on non-mobile terminal devices that are capable of generating haptic effects that can be sensed by a user.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/750,694, entitled “Haptically Enabled Messaging,” filed May 18, 2007, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3157853 | Hirsch | Nov 1964 | A |
| 3220121 | Cutler | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3497668 | Hirsch | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3902687 | Hightower | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3903614 | Diamond et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 4160508 | Salisbury, Jr. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4581491 | Boothroyd | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4708656 | De Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4938483 | Yavetz | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
| 5022407 | Horch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035242 | Franklin | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5078152 | Bond | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5208745 | Quentin et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
| 5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5271290 | Fischer | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5299810 | Pierce | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5309140 | Everett | May 1994 | A |
| 5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5466213 | Hogan | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5547382 | Yamasaki | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555894 | Doyama et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5629594 | Jacobus et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5695400 | Fennell, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5719561 | Gonzales | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721763 | Joseph et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5734373 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5764916 | Busey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766016 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5785630 | Bobick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5818836 | DuVal | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5880731 | Liles et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884029 | Brush, II et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889670 | Schuler et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5907677 | Glenn et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5933599 | Nolan | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943648 | Tel | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963217 | Grayson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973678 | Stewart et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978467 | Walker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5983190 | Trower et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987503 | Murakami | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6028593 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6046726 | Keyson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047356 | Anderson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6076100 | Cottrille et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6101530 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108704 | Hutton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6154773 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6161126 | Wies et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166732 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169540 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6175954 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6219034 | Elbing et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219045 | Leahy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6249806 | Kohda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252579 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256663 | Davis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6281651 | Haanpaa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6292174 | Mllett et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6329994 | Gever et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6339754 | Flanagan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342880 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
| 6347307 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349301 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6393461 | Okada et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396509 | Cheng | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6421048 | Shih et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6422941 | Thorner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425764 | Lamson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6442590 | Inala et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6459892 | Burgan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6496200 | Snibble et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6519771 | Zenith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523022 | Hobbs | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6539218 | Higuchi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6546390 | Pollack et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559845 | Harvill et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6563487 | Martin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6563503 | Comair et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6630944 | Kakuta et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6658010 | Enns et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6677858 | Faris et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6678720 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6693626 | Rosenberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6711264 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6715045 | Braun et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6742116 | Matsui et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6755743 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760751 | Hachiya et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6763371 | Jandel | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6859819 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6965868 | Bednarek | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 7084867 | Ho et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7149208 | Mattaway et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7159008 | Wies et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7222228 | Stephens et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7326846 | Terada | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7359721 | Gay et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7706740 | Collins et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7725824 | Ono et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7728826 | Miyata | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7779166 | Grant et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8364170 | Lohtia et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 20010044725 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020177471 | Kaaresoja et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180698 | kaelbling | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020191757 | Belrose | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030064686 | Thamason et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162595 | Serbanescu | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040056840 | Goldenberg et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125120 | Weiner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050143102 | McEvilly et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181827 | Nieminen-Sundell Riitta et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212911 | Marvit et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060066569 | Eid et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129719 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258378 | Kaikuranata | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288137 | Grant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070037590 | Lee | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057913 | Eid et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254684 | Jiang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070287477 | Tran | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080153554 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162648 | Leung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268882 | Moloney | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20110169622 | Billmaier et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 20 2006 009 826 | Sep 2006 | DE |
| 0 349 086 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0 326 439 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 655 301 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 0 997 177 | May 2000 | EP |
| 2 235 310 | Feb 1991 | GB |
| 2 325 766 | Dec 1998 | GB |
| 2 416 962 | Feb 2006 | GB |
| H2-185278 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| H4-8381 | Jan 1992 | JP |
| H5-192449 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| H7-24147 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 09-138767 | May 1997 | JP |
| 10-200882 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| H 10257135 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| H 1117783 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 2000 049956 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2001-265703 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2003-345727 | Dec 2003 | JP |
| 2004-310352 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005 333347 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 10-2010-0017875 | Feb 2010 | KR |
| WO 9425923 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO 9102313 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9440504 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 0010099 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 0203172 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO2004053671 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Microsoft PowerPoint 2003”. http://web.archive.org/web/20070104131330/http://www.uwec.edu/help/PPoint03/animate.htm Jan. 4, 2007. |
| Adelstein, “Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipulandum for Manual Control research,” DSC—vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, Edited by H. Kazerooni, pp. 1-12, 1992. |
| Adelstein, “A Virtual Environment System for the Study of Human Arm Tremor,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Jun. 1989. |
| Aukstakalnis et al., “Silicon Mirage: The Art and Science of Virtual Reality,” ISBN 0-938151-82-7, pp. 129-180, 1992. |
| Baigrie, “Electric Control Loading—A Low Cost, High Performance Alternative,” Proceedings, pp. 247-254, Nov. 6-8, 1990. |
| Bejczy et al., “A Laboratory Breadboard System for Dual-Arm Teleoperation,” SOAR '89 Workshop, JSC, Houston, TX, Jul. 25-27, 1989. |
| Bejczy et al., “Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator,” International Computer Technology Conference, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 12-15, 1980. |
| Bejczy, “Generalization of Bilateral Force-Reflecting Control of Manipulators,” Proceedings of Fourth CISM-IFToMM, Sep. 8-12, 1981. |
| Bejczy, “Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation,” Science, vol. 208, No. 4450, pp. 1327-1335, 1980. |
| Bejczy, et al., “Universal Computer Control System (UCCS) for Space Telerobots,” CH2413—3/87/0000/0318501.00 1987 IEEE, 1987. |
| Brooks et al., “Hand Controllers for Teleoperation—A State-of-the-Art Technology Survey and Evaluation,” JPL Publication 85-11; NASA-CR-175890; N85-28559, p. 1-84, Mar. 1, 1985. |
| Burdea et al., “Distributed Virtual Force Feedback, Lecture Notes for Workshop on Force Display in Virtual Environments and its Application to Robotic Teleoperation,” 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 25-44, May 2, 1993. |
| Caldwell et al., “Enhanced Tactile Feedback (Tele-Taction) Using a Multi-Functional Sensory System,” 1050-4729/93, pp. 955-960, 1993. |
| Colgate, J. Edward, et al., “Implementation of Stiff Virtual Walls in Force-Reflecting Interfaces,” Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, Sep. 1993. |
| “Cyberman Technical Specification,” Logitech Cyberman SWIFT Supplement, Apr. 5, 1994. |
| Eberhardt et al., “Including Dynamic Haptic Perception by the Hand: System Description and Some Results,” DSC—vol. 55-1, Dynamic Systems and Control: vol. 1, ASME 1994. |
| Eberhardt et al., “OMAR—A Haptic display for speech perception by deaf and deaf-blind individuals,” IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Seattle, WA, Sep. 18-22, 1993. |
| Gobel et al., “Tactile Feedback Applied to Computer Mice,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-24, 1995. |
| Gotow et al., “Controlled Impedance Test Apparatus for Studying Human Interpretation of Kinesthetic Feedback,” WA11-11:00, pp. 332-337, 1989. |
| Howe, “A Force-Reflecting Teleoperated Hand System for the Study of Tactile Sensing in Precision Manipulation,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992. |
| IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Mouse Ball-Actuating Device With Force and Tactile Feedback,” vol. 32, No. 9B, Feb. 1990. |
| Hinckley,K., “Haptic Issues for Virtual Manipulation,” Dissertation for PHD at the University of Virginia, pp. 1-200, Dec. 1996. |
| Iwata, “Pen-based Haptic Virtual Environment,” 0-7803-1363-Jan. 1993 IEEE, pp. 287-292, 1993. |
| Jacobsen et al., “High Performance, Dextrous Telerobotic Manipulator With Force Reflection,” Intervention/ROV '91 Conference & Exposition, Hollywood, Florida, May 21-23, 1991. |
| Jones et al., “A perceptual analysis of stiffness,” ISSN 0014-4819 Springer International (Springer-Verlag); Experimental Brain Research, vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 150-156, 1990. |
| Kaczmarek et al., “Tactile Displays,” Virtual Environment Technologies, May 1995. |
| Kontarinis et al., “Display of High-Frequency Tactile Information to Teleoperators,” Telemanipulator Technology and Space Telerobotics, Won S. Kim, Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 2057, pp. 40-50, Sep. 7-9, 1993. |
| Marcus, “Touch Feedback in Surgery,” Proceedings of Virtual Reality and Medicine the Cutting Edge, Sep. 8-11, 1994. |
| McAffee, “Teleoperator Subsystem/Telerobot Demonstrator: Force Reflecting Hand Controller Equipment Manual,” JPL D-5172, pp. 1-50, A1-A36, B1-B5, C1-C36, Jan. 1988. |
| Minsky, “Computational Haptics: The Sandpaper System for Synthesizing Texture for a Force-Feedback Display,” Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Jun. 1995. |
| Ouhyoung et al., “The Development of a Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and Its Use in the Virtual Reality Environment,” Proceedings of the Third Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Pacific Graphics '95, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 21-24, 1995. |
| Ouh-Young, “Force Display in Molecular Docking,” Order No. 9034744, p. 1-369, 1990. |
| Ouh-Young, “A Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and Its Use in PC Video Games,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 41, No. 3, Aug. 1995. |
| Patrick et al., “Design and Testing of a Non-reactive, Fingertip, Tactile Display for Interaction with Remote Environments,” Cooperative Intelligent Robotics in Space, Rui J. deFigueiredo et al., Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 1387, pp. 215-222, 1990. |
| Pimentel et al., “Virtual Reality: through the new looking glass,” 2nd Edition; McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-050167-X, pp. 41-202, 1994. |
| Rabinowitz et al., “Multidimensional tactile displays: Identification of vibratory intensity, frequency, and contactor area,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 82, No. 4, Oct. 1987. |
| Russo, “Controlling Dissipative Magnetic Particle Brakes in Force Reflective Devices,” DSC—vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, pp. 63-70, ASME 1992. |
| Russo, “The Design and Implementation of a Three Degree of Freedom Force Output Joystick,” MIT Libraries Archives Aug. 14, 1990, pp. 1-131, May 1990. |
| Scannell, “Taking a Joystick Ride,” Computer Currents, Boston Edition, vol. 9, No. 11, Nov. 1994. |
| Shimoga, “Finger Force and Touch Feedback Issues in Dexterous Telemanipulation,” Proceedings of Fourth Annual Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems for Space Exploration, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Sep. 30-Oct. 1, 1992. |
| Snow et al., “Model-X Force-Reflecting-Hand-Controller,” NT Control No. MPO-17851; JPL Case No. 5348, pp. 1-4, Jun. 15, 1989. |
| Stanley et al., “Computer Simulation of Interacting Dynamic Mechanical Systems Using Distributed Memory Parallel Processors,” DSC—vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, pp. 55-61, ASME 1992. |
| Tadros, “Control System Design for a Three Degree of Freedom Virtual Environment Simulator Using Motor/Brake Pair Actuators”, MIT Archive © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1-88, Feb. 1990. |
| Terry et al., “Tactile Feedback in a Computer Mouse,” Proceedings of Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, University of New Hampshire, Mar. 10-11, 1988. |
| Yamakita et al., “Tele-Virtual reality of Dynamic Mechanical Model,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC, Jul. 7-10, 1992. |
| 1998 IEEE International Conference on robotics and Automation, web page at www.winqs.buffalo.edu/academic/department/eng/mae/ieee/icra98/ABST.html, as available via the Internet. |
| Curry, “Supporting Collaborative Interaction in Tele-Immersion,” 1998, web page at www.sv.vt.edu/future/cave/pub/curryMS/CurryMS.html, as available via the Internet. |
| Hansen, “Enhancing Documents with Embedded Programs: How Ness Extends Insets in the Andrew Toolkit,” Computer Languages, 1990, IEEE. |
| Hayward et al., “Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Design and Control of Force Transmission Systems,” 1995, web page at www.cim.mcgill.ca/˜haptic/pub/MC.trans.ps.gz, as available via the Internet. |
| Jones et al., “NSF Workshop on Human-Centered Systems: Breakout Group 2—Communication and Collaboration,” web page at www.ifp.uiuc.edu/nsfhcs/bog—reports/bog2.html, as available via the Internet and printed Mar. 1, 2005. |
| MacLean, “Designing with Haptic Feedback,” 2000, web page at www.cs.ubc.ca/nest/lci/papers/2000/maclean-icra00-DesignWithHaptic-reprint.pdf, as available via the Internet. |
| Mania et al., “A Classification for User Embodiment in Collaborative Virtual Environments (extended version),” web page at www.cs.bris.ac.uk/˜mania/paper1.htm, as available via the Internet. |
| Mine, “Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques,” 1995, web page at ftp.cs.unc.edu/pub/technical-reports/95-018.ps.Z, as available via the Internet. |
| Mine, “ISAAC: A Virtual Environment Tool for the Interactive,” 1995, web page at ftp.cs.unc.edu/pub/technical-reports/95-020.ps.Z, as available via the Internet. |
| Picinbono et al., “Extrapolation: A Solution for Force Feedback?” Virtual Reality and Prototyping, 1999, web page at www-sop.inria.fr/epidaure/AISIM/CompteRendu/aisim3/picinobo.pdf, as available via the Internet. |
| Ruspini et al., “The Haptic Display of Complex Graphical Environments,” 1997, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, www.robotics.stanford.edu/people/krasi/Siggraph97.ps.Z, as available via the Internet. |
| Thompson, II et al., “maneuverable Nurbs Models within a Haptic Virtual Environment,” web page available at www.cs.utah.edu/gdc/publications/papers/thompson97b.ps.Z, as available via the Internet. |
| Wloka, “Interacting with Virtual Reality,” 1995, web page at wilma.cs.brown.edu/research/graphics/research/pub/papers/coimbra.ps, as available via the Internet. |
| ATIP98.059, Virtual Reality (VR) Development at SERI (Korea), 1998, web page at www.atip.orq/public/atip.reports.98.059r.html, as available via the Internet. |
| McLaughlin et al., “The USC Interactive Art Museum: Removing the Barriers between Museums and their Constituencies,” web page at http://ascusc.org/jcmc/paperforica.html, as available via the Internet. |
| Bouguila, et al., “Effect of Coupling Haptics and Stereopsis on Depth,” web page at www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/˜stephen/workshops/haptic/papers/bougilia-paper.pdf, as available via the Internet. |
| Pao et al., “Synergistic Visual/Haptic Computer Interfaces,” 1998, Hanoi, Vietnam, web page at schof.colorado.edu/˜pao/anonftp/vietnam.ps, as available via the Internet. |
| eRENA, Deliverable 7b.1, Pushing Mixed Reality Boundaries, 1999, web page at www.nada.kth.se/erena/pdf/D7b—1.pdf, as available via the Internet. |
| Real Time Graphics, Green Bar-Full Page EPS, Aug. 1998, web page at www.cgsd.com/rtgAug98.pdf as available via the Internet. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,739, mailed Oct. 22, 2007. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,739, mailed Mar. 5, 2008. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/608,129, mailed Sep. 24, 2003. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/608,129, mailed Mar. 19, 2004. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/608,129, mailed Aug. 10, 2004. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/608,129, mailed Mar. 15, 2005. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/608,129, mailed Nov. 28, 2005. |
| State Intellectual Office of the Peoples Republic of China, First Office Action, Application No. 200810083652, dated Dec. 15, 2009. |
| State Intellectual Office of the Peoples Republic of China, Second Office Action, Application No. 200810083652, dated Jul. 30, 2010. |
| European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to 94(3) EPC, Application No. 01995050, dated May 25, 2009. |
| European Patent Office, European Supplemental Search Report, Application No. 01995050, dated Mar. 18, 2009. |
| State Intellectual Office of the Peoples Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action, Application No. 01810866, dated Apr. 2, 2004. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for refusal, Application No. 2002-508173, dated Jun. 14, 2010. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Refusal, Application No. 2002-508173, dated Dec. 9, 2010. |
| European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 08 744 547, dated Dec. 9, 2010. |
| Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2008/058548. |
| European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to 94(4) EPC, Application No. 08744547, dated Aug. 11, 2011. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal, Application No. 2010-260419, dated Oct. 27, 2011. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal, Application No. 2010-260419, dated Jun. 20, 2012. |
| European Patent Office, European Search Report, Application No. EP12166891, dated Sep. 14, 2012. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Inquiry, Application No. 2010-509412, dated Sep. 24, 2013. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Decisions on Rejection, Application No. 2010-509412, dated Apr. 2, 2013, 2 pages. |
| Korean Patent Office, Notice of Preliminary Rejection, Korean Application No. 10-2009-7026559, mailed Jan. 16, 2014. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Japanese Application No. 2010-509412, dated Mar. 18, 2014. |
| Korean Patent Office, Notice of Preliminary Rejection, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7007023, mailed Jun. 24, 2014. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2013-156820, dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
| European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 08744547, dated Apr. 24, 2014. |
| Korean Patent Office, Notice of Last Preliminary Rejection, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2009-7026559, mailed May 29, 2014. |
| Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Rejection, Application No. 2013-156820, dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130045761 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11750694 | May 2007 | US |
| Child | 13656207 | US |
