The present invention pertains to a compact, which is useful in a tool, that comprises a hard metal substrate that is bonded to a superhard member. The superhard member and the substrate are bonded together in such a fashion to from the compact so as to facilitate the attachment of the compact to the tool. Typical tools that utilize such hard compacts include earth boring (or engaging) bits (e.g., roof drill bits, conical style cutting bits (both underground mining and construction), and oil and natural gas drill bits (e.g., fixed cutter bits, roller cone bits and hammer bits).
The substrate of the hard compact typically comprises a cobalt cemented tungsten carbide wherein the cobalt content can range between about 3 weight percent and about 16 weight percent and wherein tungsten carbide (and recognized impurities) comprise the balance. The cobalt-tungsten carbide material may also include recognized additive such as titanium, tantalum, niobium and the like. Further, the substrate may comprise other metallic materials such as, for example and without limitation, steel, tool steel and refractory metals such as, for example and without limitation, titanium, niobium, molybdenum and their alloys.
The superhard member of the hard compact may comprise a thermally stable polycrystalline (TSP) diamond member wherein the cobalt has been either partially or fully (which is preferred) leached from the diamond structure. Although the basic method to make TSP is known to those skilled in the art, a brief description of the process for manufacturing TSP is set forth. A diamond table is a layer of randomly oriented individual diamond “crystals” that are bonded together at bonding lines known as diamond-diamond boundaries in the art. The bonding of individual diamond crystals in the diamond table forms a lattice structure. A metallic binder, typically cobalt, serves as a catalyst in the formation of bonds between individual diamond crystals, and is often found within the interstitial spaces in the diamond table's lattice structure. Cobalt has a significantly different coefficient of thermal expansion as compared to diamond, so upon heating of the diamond table, the cobalt will expand more rapidly than the diamond table, causing cracks to form in the lattice structure, and eventually resulting in deterioration of the diamond table.
In order to impede crack initiation and propagation in the diamond table resulting from differential thermal expansion, strong acids are used to “leach” the cobalt from the diamond lattice structure. The removal of cobalt from the diamond table results in thermal stability of the diamond table at higher temperatures but also increases its brittleness. Accordingly, in certain cases, only a select portion (measured in any dimension) of a diamond table is leached, in order to gain thermal stability without losing impact resistance. As used herein, the term TSP diamond member includes both of the above (i.e., partially and completely leached) materials.
The cobalt-leached TSP diamond member may be coated with nickel or tungsten metal or one or more of titanium metal and titanium carbide applied via physical vapor deposition (PVD) techniques. Representative patent documents that disclose this kind of coated TSP diamond include United States Application Publication No. US 2006/0254830 to Radtke for a THERMALLY STABLE DIAMOND BRAZING and U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,350 B2 to Evans et al.
The superhard member may also comprise a silicon carbide-bonded TSP diamond member or a silicon compound-bonded TSP diamond member. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2005/0230156 A1 to Belnap et al. discloses a method for the formation of a TSP diamond member using silicon or silicon carbide as a “getter” material in conjunction with cobalt-coated diamond particles. Representative patent documents that disclose a TSP diamond member that uses silicon include U.S. Pat. No. 4,151,686 to Lee et al. for a SILICON CARBIDE AND SILICON BONDED POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND BODY AND METHOD OF MAKING IT, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,664,705 to Horton et al. for a THERMALLY STABLE POLYCRSYTALLINE DIAMOND, which mentions silicon infiltration of a diamond skeleton.
In addition, the superhard member may comprise any one of cubic boron nitride or silicon carbide or silicon nitride or alumina or SiAlON ceramics or conventional polycrystalline diamond.
In rotary well drilling operations, oil and natural gas bits are used to drill a bore hole in geological formations. These earth boring or engaging bits can include rotary cone bits, fixed cutter bits and hammer bits. In either type of earth boring bit, a steel body (or matrix) typically contains apertures that receive the hard compacts. These hard compacts (or inserts) are used as shearing, rock cutting, crushing, chipping or abrading elements. U.S. Pat. No. 5,159,857 to Jurewicz for a FIXED CUTTER BIT WITH IMPROVED DIAMOND FILLED COMPACTS, U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,183 to Fang for a HIGH STRENGTH MATRIX MATERIAL FOR PCD DRAG BITS, and United States Patent Application Publication US2005/0247491 A1 to Mirchandani et al. for EARTH-BORING BITS illustrate typical earth boring (or engaging) bits that use hard compacts. Each one of the above patent documents is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,607,249 to Taitt for CONICAL BIT PENETRATOR POCKET PROTECTOR FOR EARTH DISPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT describes a typical conical style of cutting bit. Such a conical style of cutting bit has a hard member, which could be a hard compact, contained in a socket at the axial forward end thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,199 to Shierer et al. for CUTTING BIT AND CUTTING INSERT describes a typical roof drill bit. Such a roof drill bit has a hard member, which could be a hard compact, affixed to the axial forward end of the bit body. International Patent Application Publication No. WO 95/16530 to Kennametal Inc. for POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND COMPOSITE CUTTING INSERT FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TOOL discloses a conical bit, as well as a roof drill bit, that includes a diamond composite hard member at the axial forward end thereof. Each one of the above patent documents is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Hard compacts useful in the above-mentioned earth engaging bits have been made from cemented tungsten carbide. Cemented tungsten carbide typically comprises a metal binder (e.g., cobalt, nickel or iron) with the balance tungsten carbide particles. The most common binder metal is cobalt wherein the cobalt content ranges between about 3 weight percent and about 16 weight percent. Cemented tungsten carbide may also include other additives. The exact composition of the cemented tungsten carbide compact depends upon the desired properties for the specific drilling application. Exemplary compositions of cemented tungsten carbide suitable for use in earth engaging bits are set forth in the following patent documents: U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,209 to Prizzi et al. for a ROTATABLE CUTTING BIT INSERT (discloses cobalt cemented tungsten carbide inserts that comprise between about 5 to about 13 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide, and wherein a specific composition comprised 5.4-6.0 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,945,340 to Bise et al. for a ROOF BIT AND INSERT ASSEMBLY (discloses tungsten carbide-cobalt alloys that comprise 5.4 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide, 6.3 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide, and 6.0 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide).
In addition to cemented tungsten carbide compacts, it is typical that hard compacts have comprised sintered diamond on top of a cemented (cobalt) tungsten carbide substrate. In this regard, U.S. Pat. No. 1,939,991 to Krusell for a DIAMOND CUTTING TOOL OR THE LIKE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME discloses a diamond cutting tool that has diamond inserts held in a cemented tungsten carbide matrix. As briefly described below, additional patent documents describe other hard compacts that comprise diamond and tungsten carbide.
In some prior art cutting tools, the diamond component of the tool was formed by the conversion of graphite to diamond. U.S. Pat. No. 3,850,053 to Bovenkerk for a CUTTING TOOL AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME describes a technique for making cutting tool blanks by placing a graphite disk in contact with a cemented tungsten carbide cylinder and exposing both simultaneously to diamond forming temperatures and pressures. U.S. Pat. No. 4,259,090 to Bovenkerk for a METHOD OF MAKING DIAMOND COMPACTS FOR ROCK DRILLING describes a technique for making a cylindrical mass of polycrystalline diamond by loading a mass of graphite into a cup-shaped container made from tungsten carbide and diamond catalyst material. The loaded assembly is then placed in a high temperature and pressure apparatus where the graphite is converted to diamond. U.S. Pat. No. 4,525,178 to Hall for a COMPOSITE POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND shows a composite material which includes a mixture of individual diamond crystals and pieces of pre-cemented carbide. U.S. Pat. No. 4,148,368 to Evans for ROCK BIT WITH WEAR RESISTANT INSERTS shows a tungsten carbide insert for mounting in a rolling cone cutter which includes a diamond insert embedded in a portion of the work surface of the tungsten carbide cutting insert in order to improve the wear resistance thereof.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,159,857 describes a hard compact that has a hard metal substrate and a member of polycrystalline diamonds. To make the compact, diamond powder is placed in the inner volume of the metal substrate. This composite is subjected to a treatment under heat and pressure that sinters the diamond into a raw blank. The raw blank comprises a member of integrally formed polycrystalline diamond surrounded by the hard metal substrate. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. us2005/0230150 to Oldham et al. shows the use of coated diamond members in drill bit for an earth boring application. Other patent documents show the use of cutting inserts that employ diamonds wherein these patent documents include U.S. Pat. No. 6,234,261 B1 to Evans et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,350 B2 to Evans et al. and PCT Patent Publication No. WO 99/28589 to Radtke.
Still other patent documents pertain to hard compacts for use in drill bits or components of hard compacts that use TSP diamond. In this regard, these patent documents include the following: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2006/0060391 to Eyre et al. for a THERMALLY STABLE DIAMOND POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND CONSTRUCTION, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2005/0263328 to Middlemiss for a THERMALLY STABLE DIAMOND BONDED MATERIALS AND COMPACTS, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0254830 to Radtke for THERMALLY STABLE DIAMOND BRAZING, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0191723 to Keshavan for THERMALLY STABLE POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND MATERIALS, CUTTING ELEMENTS INCORPORATING THE SAME AND BITS INCORPORATING SUCH CUTTING ELEMENTS, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0060390 to Eyre for THERMALLY STABLE DIAMOND POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND CONSTRUCTIONS.
While the hard compacts that comprise a hard metal substrate bonded to a superhard (e.g., polycrystalline diamond) member have been used in tools such as earth boring or engaging bits, there remains a need to provide an improved hard compact that can be used in such tools. There also remains a need to provide such a compact that is of such a nature to facilitate the attachment of the hard compact to the tool.
Further, even though techniques used to braze TSP diamond to tungsten carbide exist (see Suryanarayana et al., “Novel Methods of Brazing Dissimilar Materials”, Advanced Materials & Processes (March 2001) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,523,158 to Kapoor et al. for BRAZING OF DIAMOND FILM TO TUNGSTEN CARBIDE and PCT Patent Publication WO 00/34001 to Radtke for Microwave Brazing Process and Brazing Composition for TSP Diamond), there remains a need to be able to bond together a superhard member and a substrate that have heretofore been difficult to satisfactorily bond together to form a hard compact. There also remains a need to be able to bond together a superhard member and a substrate that have heretofore been difficult to satisfactorily bond together to form a hard compact that is of such a nature to facilitate the attachment of the hard compact to the tool.
In one form thereof, the invention is a hard composite member produced by a rapid omni-directional compaction process comprising the steps of: providing a pre-compaction composite comprising a substrate, a superhard member and a layer of braze between the substrate and the superhard member; placing the pre-compaction composite in a pressure transmitting material contained within a shell to form an isostatic die assembly; heating the isostatic die assembly to a temperature at which the pressure-transmitting material is capable of fluidic flow and wherein the temperature ranges between greater than the melting point of the braze layer and less than or equal to about 1200° C.; and in a forging press, compressing the isostatic die assembly to consolidate the pre-compaction composite under omnidirectional pressure equal to or greater than about 60,000 psi into a dense, consolidated body.
In yet another form thereof, the invention is a hard composite member produced by a rapid omni-directional compaction process comprising the steps of: providing a pre-compaction composite comprising a substrate comprising a partially dense green body and a superhard member; placing the pre-compaction composite in a pressure transmitting material contained within a shell to form an isostatic die assembly; heating the isostatic die assembly to a temperature at which the pressure-transmitting material is capable of fluidic flow; and in a forging press, compressing the isostatic die assembly to consolidate the pre-compaction composite under omnidirectional pressure equal to or greater than about 60,000 psi into a dense, consolidated body.
In still another form thereof, the invention is a rapid omni-directional compaction process for producing a hard composite body comprising the steps of: providing a pre-compaction composite comprising a substrate, a superhard member and a layer of braze between the substrate and the superhard member; placing the pre-compaction composite in a pressure transmitting material contained within a shell to form an isostatic die assembly; heating the isostatic die assembly to a temperature at which the pressure-transmitting material is capable of fluidic flow and wherein the temperature ranges between greater than the melting point of the braze layer and less than or equal to about 1200° C.; and in a forging press, compressing the isostatic die assembly to consolidate the pre-compaction composite under omnidirectional pressure equal to or greater than about 60,000 psi into a dense, consolidated body.
In yet another form thereof, the invention is a rapid omni-directional compaction process for producing a hard composite body comprising the steps of: providing a pre-compaction composite comprising a substrate comprising a partially dense green body and a superhard member; placing the pre-compaction composite in a pressure transmitting material contained within a shell to form an isostatic die assembly; heating the isostatic die assembly to a temperature at which the pressure-transmitting material is capable of fluidic flow; and in a forging press, compressing the isostatic die assembly to consolidate the pre-compaction composite under omnidirectional pressure equal to or greater than about 60,000 psi into a dense, consolidated body.
In still another form thereof, the invention is a consolidation process for producing a hard composite body comprising the steps of: providing a pre-compaction composite comprising a substrate comprising a partially dense green body and a superhard member; placing the pre-compaction composite in a bed of flowable particles; and effecting pressurization of said bed to cause pressure transmission via said particles to said pre-compaction composite, thereby to consolidate the pre-compaction composite into the hard composite.
The following is a brief description of the drawings that form a part of this patent application:
Referring to the drawings, there is shown in
It should be appreciated that the pre-compaction condition of the substrate 102 was that it was a so-called green compact, which means that it exhibited a partial density. During the ROC process, the substrate 102 was securely joined or bonded to the superhard member 110. Further, upon the pre-compaction composite being subjected to the ROC process, the shrinkage of the green substrate would essentially mechanically lock the superhard member in the cavity. In such an arrangement, the superhard member could be bonded to the substrate via a metallurgical phenomenon, as well as through the mechanical bonding or locking mechanism.
As still another alternative, the pre-compaction composite that uses the green substrate could also employ a layer of braze alloy between the green substrate and the superhard member. In this arrangement, after compaction by the ROC process, the superhard member would be both mechanically bonded or locked to the substrate, as well as metallurgically bonded to the substrate at the braze joint.
The specific embodiments illustrated in
A cobalt-leached TSP diamond member exhibits porosity (as defined by voids) due to the removal of the cobalt or other binder material. In the case where the superhard member (or possibly the substrate) has porosity, braze material extrudes into the voids that define the porosity during the ROC (or other consolidation) process. In such a situation, braze material bonds to the superhard member with porosity via extrusion of braze into the voids that define the porosity. Other kinds of superhard members, as well as substrates in the typical case, do not exhibit porosity defined by voids. Braze material bonds to those superhard members (or substrates) that do not have porosity by a surface wetting phenomenon. In the cases where braze material is used, applicants thus consider bonding between braze material and the superhard member (or substrate) to occur when there is extrusion of braze into the voids that define the porosity in the superhard member (or substrate) and/or there is a surface wetting phenomenon between the braze layer and superhard member (or substrate). It should be appreciated that typically when there is extrusion of braze into the voids that define the porosity, there also exists the surface wetting phenomenon.
Further, applicants also consider bonding to occur between the substrate and the superhard member in those situations where the substrate has shrunk around all or part of the superhard member. As described herein, in such a situation, the green (partially dense) substrate contains a cavity that receives the superhard member. Upon completion of the consolidation process, the green substrate has shrunk in volume so as to compress against the superhard member. The existence of the mechanical bonding (or locking) between the substrate and the superhard member can exist whether or not there is also braze material present.
Referring to each one of the above specific embodiments, one preferred material for the substrate is cobalt cemented tungsten carbide wherein the cobalt content can range between about 3 weight percent and about 16 weight percent wherein tungsten carbide (and recognized impurities) comprising the balance. The cobalt-tungsten carbide material may also include recognized additive such as titanium, tantalum, niobium and the like. Applicants also contemplate that the substrate may comprise other metallic materials such as, for example and without limitation, steel, tool steel and refractory metals such as, for example and without limitation, titanium, niobium, molybdenum and their alloys.
Also referring to each one of the above embodiments, the superhard member may comprise any one of a number of different TSP diamond members. In this regard, the superhard member may comprise a cobalt-leached TSP diamond material. As mentioned hereinabove, representative patent documents that disclose cobalt-leached TSP diamond material includes U.S. Pat. No. 4,931,363 to Slutz et al. for BRAZED THERMALLY-STABLE POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND COMPACT WORKPIECES, U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,985 to Griffin et al. for a POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND PARTIALLY DEPLETED OF CATALYZING MATERIAL, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,923 to Bunting et al. for a COMPOSITE ABRASIVE COMPACT HAVING HIGH THERMAL STABILITY.
The superhard member may also comprise a silicon carbide-bonded TSP diamond member or a silicon compound-bonded TSP diamond member. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2005/0230156 A1 to Belnap et al. discloses a method for the formation of a TSP diamond member using silicon or silicon carbide as a “getter” material in conjunction with cobalt-coated diamond particles. Representative patent documents that disclose a TSP diamond member that uses silicon include U.S. Pat. No. 4,151,686 to Lee et al. for a SILICON CARBIDE AND SILICON BONDED POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND BODY AND METHOD OF MAKING IT, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,664,705 to Horton et al. for a THERMALLY STABLE POLYCRSYTALLINE DIAMOND, which mentions silicon infiltration of a diamond skeleton.
The superhard member may comprise a nickel-coated TSP diamond material. Representative patent documents that disclose this kind of TSP diamond include United States Application Publication No. US 2006/0254830 to Radtke for a THERMALLY STABLE DIAMOND BRAZING and U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,350 B2 to Evans et al.
These kinds of TSP diamond materials (e.g., cobalt-leached TSP diamond material, silicon carbide-bonded TSP diamond material, silicon compound-bonded TSP diamond material, cobalt-leached nickel-coated TSP diamond material) are typically stable up to a temperature equal to about 1200° C. It should also be appreciated that the superhard member may comprise cubic boron nitride (cBN), as well as other recognized superhard materials (for example, without limitation, coated TSP diamond wherein the coating comprises one or more of tungsten metal and titanium metal and titanium carbide applied via physical vapor deposition (PVD) techniques, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, alumina, SiAlON ceramics and conventional polycrystalline diamonds).
In regard to the braze alloy, it may take on the form of a paste (or powder) or a strip wherein the strip has a minimum thickness equal to about 0.003 inches (about 0.08 millimeters). In the case of a braze strip, it is also possible to coat the braze strip with a metal such as, for example, titanium.
It is preferable that the braze alloy is an active braze alloy that has a melting point equal to or greater than about 800° C. and may include (without limitation) any one or more of the following elements: silver, copper, nickel, titanium, vanadium, niobium, phosphorous, gold, palladium, chromium, silicon, aluminum, indium, and molybdenum. It is contemplated that instead of a single layer of braze alloy, the interface between the substrate and the superhard member (e.g., TSP diamond body) may comprise a braze scheme which comprise two layers of braze alloy. One of the braze alloy layers wets the superhard member (e.g., TSP diamond body) and the other bonds the diamond-wetting braze to the material that forms the substrate (e.g., cemented (cobalt) tungsten carbide). Further, it is contemplated that the superhard member (e.g., TSP diamond body) may be coated with a braze alloy to provide either the only braze alloy or a part of the overall braze alloy scheme.
The general geometry of the above embodiments is generally cylindrical; however, it should be appreciated that the geometric shapes of the hard compacts could be other than cylindrical. For example, the shape of the hard compact could be an elongate oval shape in cross section or square in cross-section or rectangular in cross-section. The specific application for the hard compact may dictate (or at least influence) the geometry thereof keeping in mind that during the drilling operation, the superhard member impinges upon the earth strata of the geological formation to shear, cut, crush, chip or abrade the components (e.g., rock) of the earth strata.
The inventive method to make the hard compact uses the rapid omni-directional compaction (ROC) process. Referring to
Suitable pressure transmitting materials include glasses that have sufficient viscosity so that the glass fails to penetrate the body under an applied pressure. Representative glasses include glasses containing high concentrations of silica and boron. A commercial glass useful in the temperature range from 1000° C. to 1400° C. is Corning-type PYREX 7740™ glass. Pressure transmitting materials are described in more detail in the following patent documents: U.S. Pat. No. 4,446,100; U.S. Pat. No. 3,469,976; U.S. Pat. No. 3,455,682; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,943. Each one of the above-mentioned patent documents is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Another suitable pressure transmitting material is soda lime glass. In this regard, based upon a data sheet from Flex-O-Lite, Inc., a general composition (in weight percent) for soda lime glass is 73% silicon dioxide, 15% sodium dioxide, 7% calcium oxide, 4% magnesium oxide and 1% alumina (aluminum oxide).
The shell containing the pre-compaction composite body and pressure transmitting medium preferably forms an enclosed right cylinder that can be placed in pot die tooling 210 of a forging press. The pot die tooling 210, as it is known in the forging industry, consists of a cylindrical cavity 212 closed at one end by an ejector assembly 214 and at the other by a cylindrical ram 216. Upon compression in the tooling, the shell must distort predictably and not crack or leak.
The preferred shell material for the temperature range from 150° C. to about 1650° C. using glass pressure transmitting media is a shell cast of a thixotropic ceramic, as described by U.S. Pat. No. 4,428,906 to Timm, incorporated herein by reference. The thixotropic ceramic material comprises a ceramic skeleton network and pressure transmitting material that deforms or fractures allowing compression of the pressure transmitting material, while retaining enough structural integrity to keep the pressure transmitting fluid from leaking out of the pot die.
Once the pre-compaction composite body 200 is embedded in the pressure transmitting material contained in the shell, this shell assembly is heated in an inert atmosphere to a temperature suitable for forging. The temperature of this step ranges between about 700° C. and about 1200° C. with a preferred temperature equal to less than or equal to about 1100° C. It should be appreciated that it is typical the specific temperature is dependent upon the overall material system. These considerations include the braze alloy system, the specific composition and properties of the substrate and the TSP diamond, and the condition of the substrate (e.g., a partially dense green body or a fully dense sintered body).
The time at temperature must be a time sufficient to completely fluidize the pressure-transmitting medium and to bring the bodies to a temperature roughly in equilibrium with the temperature of the pressure transmitting material. Typical times range from between about 1 hour to about 3 hours for both heating to the compaction temperature and maintaining the compaction temperature. The time at the compaction temperature is maintained generally from about 1 to about 30 minutes before being pressed in the pot die of the forging pressed described below.
The heated shell assembly is pressed in a forging press as described below and by U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,943 to Timm, incorporated herein by reference. The heated shell is pressed in the forging press by compressing the assembly with a ram in a closed cavity such as the pot die tooling previously described. As the ram compresses the assembly in the cavity, the pressure transmitting material exerts a large hydrostatic pressure (for example, and without limitation, 120,000 psi) on the bodies to densify them. The shell material of the assembly flows into the clearance between the ram and pot die and forms, in effect, a pressure seal so that the liquid pressure transmitting material does not escape into the pot die.
After pressing, the shell assembly is ejected from the pot die.
After ejection from the pot die, the densified bodies are separated from the pressure transmitting material (PTM) by a method such as pouring the liquid PTM through a screen, the densified bodies being retained on the screen which is described in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,943 to Timm, which is incorporated herein by reference. Any residual material remaining on the bodies may be removed by, for example, sand blasting. The entire assembly may also be cooled to room temperature before removing the densified bodies. The bodies are subsequently removed from the hardened glass PTM, for example, by breaking the glass PTM with a hammer. Further finishing of the densified bodies such as grinding and polishing may be performed.
Various aspects of the ROC process are disclosed in the following documents: U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,943 to Timm, U.S. Pat. No. 4,656,002 to Lizenby, U.S. Pat. No. 4,341,557 to Lizenby, U.S. Pat. No. 4,428,906 to Rozmus, and an article by Kelto (Metals Handbook, “Rapid Omnidirectional Compaction” Vol. 7, pages 542-546). Various aspects of using a bed of pressure transmitting material are treated in Meeks et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,032,352 and 4,975,414); Anderson et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,980,340 and 4,808,224); Oslin (U.S. Pat. No. 4,933,140); and Chan et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,915,605). Each one of the above patents is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Applicants contemplate that the compaction process may also include those compaction processes shown and described in one or more of the following United States patent documents. One such patent document is U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,505 B2 to Witherspoon et al. which describes a consolidation process by which combustible gases are ignited to create the pressure to drive pistons and movable dies to consolidate an article.
Another such patent document is United States Patent Application Publication US2005/0147520 to Canzona. The Canzona patent document describes a so-called Ceracon process in which a powder is placed within and surrounded by a bed of flowable pressure transmitting medium (PTM) whereby the PTM is pressurized and compressed so that pressure is transmitted through the PTM to the powder. The Canzona patent document discloses pre-heating the PTM prior to the consolidation process.
In still another patent document, U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,549 to Ecer discloses a process by which first and second powder components are consolidated through longitudinally applied pressure. The Ecer patent also discloses that the Ceracon process is disclosed in the following U.S. patents: U.S. Pat. No. 3,356,496 to Hailey, U.S. Pat. No. 3,689,259 to Hailey, U.S. Pat. No. 4,499,048 to Hanejko, U.S. Pat. No. 4,499,049 to Hanejko and U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,175 to Lichti et al.
In circumstances that utilize a green (i.e., a partially dense) substrate, it is expected that the pre-compaction composite may exhibit a shrinkage factor equal to between about 1.18 and about 1.24. As an alternative, the shrinkage factor equal to between about 1.19 and about 1.24. One specific shrinkage factor is equal to about 1.22. The shrinkage is due to the consolidation of the green substrate upon being subjected to the consolidation process (e.g., the ROC process). In those situations where the green substrate contains a cavity or the like that receives the superhard member, the shrinkage of the green substrate results in a mechanical bonding between the substrate and the superhard member.
The present invention is illustrated by the following Examples 1 through 28 of Table 1, which are provided to demonstrate the various aspects of the present invention. The following examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claimed invention.
The following inventive Examples 1 through 28 demonstrate the advantages connected with the hard compact of the present invention. For each one of the inventive examples, the substrate (or substrate) was cobalt cemented tungsten carbide sold by Kennametal Inc. of Latrobe, Pa. 15650 under the designated RTW 374. This grade RTW 374 has a composition of about 6 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide and recognized impurities. Another acceptable grade for the substrate is a cobalt cemented tungsten carbide sold by Kennametal Inc. of Latrobe, Pa. 15650 under the designated RTW 393, which has a composition of about 9 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide and recognized impurities. Further, applicants contemplate that the cemented (cobalt) tungsten carbide may have a composition that ranges between about 3 weight percent and about 16 weight percent cobalt with the balance tungsten carbide and recognized impurities. Applicants contemplate that the cemented (cobalt) tungsten carbide could also contain recognized additives such as those mentioned hereinabove and those known to those skilled in the art.
For Examples 1 through 28, Table 1 below sets forth the composition (in weight percent) and form (i.e., the braze was either in the form of a strip that was 0.003 inches (0.08 millimeters) thick or in the form of a paste), as well as the liquidus temperature (in ° C.), of the specific braze alloy. Further, Table 1 sets forth the supplier of the braze alloy and the supplier's designation for the braze alloy. In this regard, the designation “Prince & Izant” refers to The Prince & Izant Company, 12999 Plaza Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 44130. The designation “Fusion” refers to Fusion Inc., 4658 East 355th Street, Willoughby, Ohio 44094. The designation “Lucas-Milhaupt” refers to Lucas Milhupt, Inc., 5656 S. Pennsylvania Ave., Cudahy, Wis. 53110. The designation “Morgan Advanced Ceramics” refers to Morgan Technical Ceramics, 26 Madison Road, Fairfield, N.J. 07004. Although not specifically listed in Table 1, applicants contemplate that another suitable braze alloy is designated as Gold-ABA and has the composition: about 97.5 weight percent gold, about 0.75 weight percent nickel, and about 1.75 weight percent vanadium.
In reference to Examples 17-19, the designation “+Nb” and “+Cr” means small amounts of powder were added to increase the braze wetting and the bond strength. Niobium and chromium are among the elements that bond more readily with diamond materials. In reference to Examples 4, 7, 9-12, 12, 22 and 23, each of which use a strip of braze, the last component (e.g., “5Ti”) comprises the amount and kind of coating applied to the strip. What this means is that the actual braze joint has a composition slightly different from the composition of the strip itself. For example, in Example 4, the actual braze joint has a composition equal to 72/105 weight percent Ag, 28/105 Cu and 5/105 Ti. For Examples 15, 16 and 20, each of which is a paste alloy, the last component (e.g., “0.5Ti”) comprises the amount and kind of material added to the braze alloy. What this means is that the actual braze joint has a composition slightly different from the initial composition of the paste itself. For example, in Example 20, the actual braze joint has a composition equal to 72/100.5 weight percent Ag, 28/100.5 Cu and 0.5/100.5 Ti.
In regard to the ROC compaction processing, all of the Examples 1-28 were compacted via a ROC process at a pressure of 120,000 psi for a duration equal to about one minute and at the temperatures set forth in Table 1 as the ROC temperature (° C.), which are roughly at about 50° C. above the liquidus of the braze alloy. For each one of Examples 1-28, Table 1 also sets forth the kind of pressure transmitting material.
For each one of Examples 1-28, Table 1 also sets forth the nature of the TSP diamond material. In this regard, the term “leached” means that the TSP diamond was fully leached in that all of the cobalt was fully leached out of the diamond. The following patent documents, which have been listed hereinabove, disclose typical TSP material that has been subjected to cobalt leaching at least to some extent: U.S. Pat. No. 4,931,363 to Slutz et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,985 to Griffin et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,923 to Bunting et al.
As used in Table 1, the term “SiC bond” means that the TSP diamond material was made by mixing together the diamond component and the silicon carbide component and then consolidating the mixture to form SiC-bonded TSP diamond member. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0207802 to Zhang et al, mentions this kind of TSP at Paragraph [0037] thereof. As used in Table 1, the term “Si-compound” means that the TSP diamond material (45 micron grain size of the diamond) was made by mixing together the diamond component and the silicon-compound component and then consolidating the mixture to form the Si-compound TSP diamond member.
The term “leached/Ni coated” means that the TSP diamond member (5 micron grain size of the diamond) was fully leached of all cobalt. The fully cobalt-leached diamond member was then coated with nickel. The following patent documents, which have been listed hereinabove, disclose cobalt-leached diamond members that have been nickel coated: United States Application Publication No. US 2006/0254830 to Radtke and U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,350 B2 to Evans et al.
For certain ones of the examples, the microstructure of the interface between the TSP diamond member and the braze alloy, as well as the interface between the braze alloy and the cemented (cobalt) tungsten carbide substrate, was evaluated through photomicrographs. A discussion of these photomicrographs is set forth hereinafter. The typical structure of the hard compact test specimen is shown in
Further, the assembly of the components with the carbide cap or graphite cap attached thereto is wrapped in graphite foil or grafoil (see
In reference to
Overall, an examination of the microstructure as shown in
Overall, the photomicrographs show that the ROC process is a novel and successful process to bond thermally stable polycrystalline diamonds to a cemented (cobalt) carbide substrate.
It can be appreciated that the present invention provides an improved hard compact, which comprises a hard metal substrate bonded to a superhard (e.g., polycrystalline diamond) member wherein such hard compact can be used in tools such as earth boring or engaging bits through an improved ability to facilitate the attachment of the hard compact to the tool. Further, it can be appreciated that the present invention provides the ability to bond together a superhard member and a substrate that have heretofore been difficult to satisfactorily bond together to form a hard compact so as to result in an improved ability to facilitate the attachment of the hard compact to the tool.
Also, it can be appreciated that the invention provides a hard compact (or even a new generation of PCD cutters) where thermally stable polycrystalline diamond is successfully bonded to a substrate (e.g., a cemented (cobalt) tungsten carbide substrate) wherein the hard compact exhibits increased (or better) drilling footage and longer drilling life without graphitization of the diamond at a temperature up to about 1200° C. Heretofore, earlier PCD (polycrystalline diamond) hard compacts have experienced degradation (e.g., graphitization) problems at temperatures equal to about 700-800° C., and most certainly such hard compacts have experienced such problems at temperatures equal to or greater than about 1200° C.
All patents, patent applications, articles and other documents identified herein are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other embodiments of the invention may be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or the practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and any examples set forth herein be considered as illustrative only, with the true spirit and scope of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1939991 | Krusell | Dec 1933 | A |
3356496 | Hailey | Dec 1967 | A |
3455682 | Barbaras | Jul 1969 | A |
3469976 | Iler | Sep 1969 | A |
3689259 | Hailey | Sep 1972 | A |
3850053 | Bovenkerk | Nov 1974 | A |
4148368 | Evans | Apr 1979 | A |
4151686 | Lee et al. | May 1979 | A |
4259090 | Bovenkerk | Mar 1981 | A |
4341557 | Lizenby | Jul 1982 | A |
4428906 | Rozmus | Jan 1984 | A |
4446100 | Adlerborn et al. | May 1984 | A |
4499048 | Hanelko | Feb 1985 | A |
4499049 | Hanejko | Feb 1985 | A |
4525178 | Hall | Jun 1985 | A |
4539175 | Lichti et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4664705 | Horton et al. | May 1987 | A |
4670025 | Pipkin | Jun 1987 | A |
4673549 | Ecer | Jun 1987 | A |
4744943 | Timm | May 1988 | A |
4808224 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4850523 | Slutz | Jul 1989 | A |
4875907 | Phaal et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4915605 | Chan et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919974 | McCune et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923512 | Timm et al. | May 1990 | A |
4931363 | Slutz et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4933140 | Oslin | Jun 1990 | A |
4940180 | Martell | Jul 1990 | A |
4945073 | Dubensky et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4975414 | Meeks et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4980340 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4985051 | Ringwood | Jan 1991 | A |
5011509 | Frushour | Apr 1991 | A |
5032352 | Meeks et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5127923 | Bunting et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5159857 | Jurewicz | Nov 1992 | A |
5219209 | Prizzi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232522 | Doktycz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5256608 | Dubensky et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5334561 | Matsui et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5429199 | Sheirer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5523158 | Kapoor et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5563107 | Dubensky et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5612264 | Nilsson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5662183 | Fang | Sep 1997 | A |
5716170 | Kammermeier et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5804321 | Thorpe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5880382 | Fang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6102140 | Boyce et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6234261 | Evans et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6315066 | Dennis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6372012 | Majagi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6460636 | Yong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481511 | Matthias et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6571889 | Griffo et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575350 | Evans et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592985 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607249 | Taitt | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6767505 | Witherspoon et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6843333 | Richert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6945340 | Bise et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7040424 | Yong et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7128773 | Liang et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20050147520 | Canzona | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230150 | Oldham et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230156 | Belnap et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247491 | Mirchandani et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263328 | Middlemiss | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060060390 | Eyre | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060391 | Eyre et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060191723 | Keshavan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207802 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254830 | Radtke | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070023206 | Keshavan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080029310 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080223621 | Middlemiss et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9516530 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9928589 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0034001 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Suryanarayana et al., “Novel Methods of Brazing Dissimilar Materials”, Advanced Materials and Processes (Mar. 2001) (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080230279 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |