Contained herein is material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction of the patent disclosure by any person as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all rights to the copyright whatsoever. Copyright © 2002-2016, Fortinet, Inc.
Field
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to data communications, and in particular to network routing and routing systems, and more particularly to packet multicasting.
Description of the Related Art
Conventional routing systems generally perform packet multicasting in a single routing context using a single multicast address space. With this approach, supporting various multicast features for different customers may require the use of a separate router for each customer. This approach may also prevent users from taking advantage of packet multicasting resources available from multiple routing contexts with private and potentially overlapping address spaces.
Methods and systems are described for hardware-accelerated packet multicasting. According to one embodiment, a first multicast packet to be multicast to a first multicast destination is received by a virtual routing system. The first received multicast packet is caused to be transmitted to the first multicast destination by: (i) directing the first received multicast packet to a first virtual router (VR) of multiple VRs instantiated within the virtual routing system by selecting the first VR from among the multiple VRs to multicast the first received multicast packet; (ii) configuring the virtual routing system to use a routing context associated with the first selected VR in connection with processing of the first received multicast packet; (iii) reading at least a portion of the first received multicast packet from one of multiple multicast address spaces associated with the first selected VR; and (iv) forwarding the first received multicast packet to the first multicast destination. A second multicast packet to be multicast to a second multicast destination is received by the virtual routing system. The second received multicast packet is caused to be transmitted to the second multicast destination by: (i) directing the second received multicast packet to a second VR of the multiple VRs by selecting the second VR from among the multiple VRs to multicast the second received multicast packet; (ii) configuring the virtual routing system to use a routing context associated with the second selected VR in connection with processing of the second received multicast packet; (iii) reading at least a portion of the second received multicast packet from one of multiple multicast address spaces associated with the second selected VR; and (iv) forwarding the second received multicast packet to the second multicast destination.
Other features of embodiments of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows.
Embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Methods and systems are described for hardware-accelerated packet multicasting. In various embodiments of the present invention, virtual routing systems and methods takes advantage of multiple routing contexts thereby allowing a service provider to support multicast features for many different access clients with a single piece of hardware.
Reference is made herein to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that embodiments of the present invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form.
Embodiments of the present invention include various steps, which will be described below. The steps may be performed by hardware components or may be embodied in machine-executable instructions, which may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor programmed with the instructions to perform the steps. Alternatively, the steps may be performed by a combination of hardware, software, firmware and/or by human operators.
Embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a computer program product, which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, compact disc read-only memories (CD-ROMs), and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, random access memories (RAMs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. Moreover, embodiments of the present invention may also be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer to a requesting computer by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).
Terminology
Brief definitions of terms used throughout this application are given below.
The terms “connected” or “coupled” and related terms are used in an operational sense and are not necessarily limited to a direct connection or coupling.
The phrases “in one embodiment,” “according to one embodiment,” and the like generally mean the particular feature, structure, or characteristic following the phrase is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, and may be included in more than one embodiment of the present invention. Importantly, such phases do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.
If the specification states a component or feature “may”, “can”, “could”, or “might” be included or have a characteristic, that particular component or feature is not required to be included or have the characteristic.
The term “responsive” includes completely or partially responsive.
In one embodiment, several VPNs and/or VRs may, for example, run on one of processing engines (PEs) 116 of VRE 104. A VPN or VR may be a software context comprised of a set of objects that are resident in the processing engine's memory system. The software context may include the state and processes found in a conventional router, however hundreds or more of these virtual router contexts may be overlaid onto a single processing engine and associated memory system. Accordingly, one of processing engines 116 may provide the context of many VRs to be shared allowing one piece of hardware, such as virtual routing system 100, to function as up to a hundred or even a thousand or more routers.
Line interface 102 may receive packets of different packet flows from an external network over a communication channel. VREs 104 may perform packet classification, deep packet inspection, and service customization. In one embodiment, VRE 104 may support up to one million or more access control list (ACL) level packet flows. VREs 104 may include a virtual routing processor (not illustrated) to provide hardware assisted IP packet forwarding, multi-protocol label switching (MPLS), network address translation (NAT), differentiated services (DiffServ), statistics gathering, metering and marking. VREs 104 and VSEs 106 may include a virtual service controller (not illustrated) to support parallel processing and pipelining for deep packet inspection and third-party application computing. VSEs 106 may perform parallel processing and/or pipelining, and other high-end computing techniques, which may be used for third party applications such as firewall services and anti-virus services. ASEs 108 may provide for hardware and hardware assisted acceleration of security processing, including encryption/decryption acceleration for IP security protocol type (IPSec) packet flows and virtual private networks (VPNs). Switching fabric 110 may be a high-capability non-blocking switching fabric supporting rates of up to 51.2 Gbps and greater.
Line interface 102 may include a flow manager (not illustrated) to load-balance service requests to VSEs 106 and VREs 104, and may support robust priority and/or weighted round robin queuing. In one embodiment, the flow manager may provide for service load balancing and may dynamically determine one of VREs 104, which may best handle a certain packet flow. Accordingly, all packets of a particular flow may be sent to the same VRE 104. Line interface 102 may identify one of the VREs to process packets of a packet flow based on a physical interface and virtual channel from which the packets of the packet flow were received. The identified VRE may perform ingress metering, header transformation and egress metering for packets of the packet flow. In one embodiment, hardware based metering and marking using a dual token bucket scheme assists in rate-control capabilities of system 100. This may allow for granular application level support and the ability to provide strong performance based service level agreements (SLAs).
Different packets may take different paths through virtual routing system 100 and may not necessarily require the resources of all the various functional elements of virtual routing system 100. In one embodiment, a packet, such as a virtual local area network (VLAN) Ethernet packet, may arrive at an input port of line interface 102. The input port may be a gigabit Ethernet input port, which may be one of several input ports. The flow manager may program a steering table look-up to determine which VLAN is associated with a particular one of VREs 104. The flow manager may tag the packet with an internal control header and may transfer the packet from line interface 102 across switching fabric 110 to the selected VRE 104. A service controller of VRE 104 may perform deep packet classification and extract various fields on the packet header. A flow cache may be looked up to determine whether the packet should be processed in hardware or software. If the packet is to be processed in hardware, an index to the packet processing action cache may be obtained.
The packet may be deposited via a high-speed direct access memory (DMA) into the VRE's main memory. A routing processor may retrieve the packet, identify the packet processing actions and may perform actions, such as time-to-live decrementation, IP header and checksum updating, and IP forwarding patch matching. Egress statistics counters may also be updated. The packet may be forwarded to one of ASEs 108 for security operations. The packet may also be forwarded to another one of VREs 104.
Although system 100 is illustrated as having several separate functional elements, one or more of the functional elements may be combined and may be implemented by combinations of software configured elements, such as processors including digital signal processors (DSPs), and/or other hardware elements.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, virtual routing system 100 supports a plurality of virtual routers (VRs) instantiated by one of virtual routing engines (VRE) 104 and which may operate on PE's 116. In this embodiment, the instantiation of each VR includes an associated routing context. The virtual routing system may perform a method of multicasting packets that comprises determining one of the plurality of VRs for a packet received from a service provider for multicasting, and switching a routing context of the VRE to a routing context associated with the VR determined for received packet. At least a portion of the packet is read from one of a plurality of multicast address spaces associated with the selected VR to multicast the packet. The packet may be a first packet received from a service provider for multicasting to a first multicast destination, and when a second packet is received from the service provider for multicasting, the method may also include determining another one of the VRs for the second packet, and switching the routing context of the VRE to a routing context associated with the VR determined for the second packet. At least a portion of the second packet is read from another of the plurality of multicast address spaces associated with the VR determined for the second packet to multicast the second packet. The second packet may be forwarded to second multicast destinations.
Accordingly, multiple VRs may utilize multiple multi-cast address spaces, which may allow a service provider, such as an Internet Service Provider (ISP), to utilize system 100 simultaneously for multicasting for many different access clients (i.e., subscribers). Conventional routing systems may require a separate router for each customer or service provider.
For next instances of multicasting the packet, packet classifying system 202 may send a next of the flow classification indices to packet transforming system 208 without the multicast packet, and packet transforming system 208 may identify next transform control instructions from the next of the flow classification indices. Packet transforming system 208 may also read the multicast packet from buffer 212, and transform the multicast packet in accordance with the next transform control instructions.
In one embodiment, the flow classification index may identify the packet as a multicast packet and accordingly, the packet can re-read from buffer 212 rather than be re-sent from packet classifier 208 for each instance of multicasting. This is described in more detail below. Although system 200 is illustrated as having several separate functional elements, one or more of the functional elements may be combined and may be implemented by combinations of software configured elements, such as processors including digital signal processors (DSPs), and/or other hardware elements. In embodiments of the present invention, at least a payload portion of a packet (e.g., a packet without all or portions of the header) may be buffered in input buffer 206, may be transferred to packet transforming system 208 and may be buffered in output buffer 212. In these embodiments, packet classifying system 202 may remove all or portions of the header during packet classification, and packet transforming system 208 may add all or portions of a new header during packet transformation.
Operation 412 determines if the classified packet flow is a multicast packet flow or a unicast packet flow. When the packet flow is a unicast packet flow, operation 414 may repeat the performance of operations 402 through 412 for a subsequent packet. When the packet flow is a multicast packet flow, operation 416 is performed. In operation 416, the next flow index of the plurality of indices is retrieved and in operation 418, it is sent to the egress system. In one embodiment, a descriptor included with the next flow index indicates that the flow is a multicast flow instructing the egress system to use a previous packet. Operation 420 determines when there are more flow indices and operations 416 and 418 may be performed for each of the remaining indices. Operation 422 may set a memory release bit to allow the egress system to release the memory location where it has stored the multicast packet after receipt of the last flow index. In one embodiment, the memory release bit may be part of a descriptor, and in another embodiment, it may be a particular bit of the flow index sent in operation 418.
When there are no more flow indices of the plurality to be sent, each instance of packet multicasting has been provided to the egress system, and operation 424 may be performed for a next packet flow re-performing procedure 400. Although the individual operations of procedure 400 are illustrated and described as separate operations, one or more of the individual operations may be performed concurrently and nothing requires that the operations be performed in the order illustrated.
Operation 504 determines when the flow index is for a multicast packet flow. When operation 504 determines when the flow index is for a multicast packet flow, operation 506 is performed. Operation 506 determines whether the flow index is for a first instance of a multicast flow. When operation 506 determines that the flow index is for a first index of a multicast flow, or when operation 504 determines that the flow index is not for a multicast flow, operation 508 is performed. In operation 508, the received packet is buffered in memory, such as buffer 212. In operation 510, a transform index may be identified for the packet from the received flow index. In operation 512, the buffered packet may be read from the buffer, the transform index may be attached to the packet in operation 514. In operation 516, the transform index and packet are sent to a packet transform processor, such as an egress processor. In operation 518, the transform processor may perform a packet transform on the packet by using the transform index. In one embodiment, the transform index may identify a transform control block (TCB), such as TCB 210 (
In the case of a multicast packet flow wherein the packet is not received in operation 502, operations 522-526 are performed. Similar to operation 510, operation 522 identifies a transform index from the received flow index. In operation 522, similar to operation 512, the buffered packet is read from the buffer. In operation 526, the memory location where the multicast packet is stored may be released in the case of the last instance of the multicast flow. In one embodiment, a descriptor may be used to identify when to release the memory location. The descriptor may be part of the flow index received in operation 502.
Accordingly, for a multicast flow, a packet may be received only once (i.e., the first time) and stored only once (e.g., operation 508) and for subsequent instances of multicasting, the packet is re-read from a buffer. Although the individual operations of procedure 500 are illustrated and described as separate operations, one or more of the individual operations may be performed concurrently and nothing requires that the operations be performed in the order illustrated.
PFE 600 may operate in one of PEs 116 (
In one embodiment, the micro-architecture of both PFE 600 ingress and egress units may include an array of packet processors 616 that may share an on-chip write-back cache 614. Each packet processor may operate on a different packet and hardware interlocks may maintain packet order. The ingress packet processors may share common micro-code for ingress processing and the egress packet processors may share common micro-code for egress processing. Memory of PFE 600 may map the ingress and egress instruction stores and supports micro-code updates through write transactions.
Ingress system 602 may pass forwarding state to the DMA engine, which may incorporate this state into the packet, receive descriptor. This forwarding state indicates whether the CPU should software forward the packet or the packet may bypass the CPU and PFE 600 can hardware forward the packet. The forwarding state also may include an index into a forwarding transform cache that describes PFE processing per packet micro-flow. For software forwarded packets, the receive descriptor may be pushed onto the DMA ingress descriptor queue. For hardware forwarded packets, including multicast packets, the descriptor may bypass the DMA ingress queue and be pushed directly onto the DMA egress descriptor queue as a transmit descriptor.
In an embodiment of the present invention, ingress system 602 may provide at least two basic forms of packet classification. One is flow-based, using various fields of the LQ header along with fields in the L3/L4 headers to identify a particular micro-flow in the context of a particular VR. The other form uses the upper bits of the IP address or MPLS label to index a table of flow indices. The host software controls which classification form PFE 600 uses by programming different micro-code into the ingress instruction store. In both forms, the classification result may be a forwarding index that the hardware uses to select the correct packet transformations.
In an embodiment of the present invention, each flow ID cache entry stores the LQ ID, LQ protocol, L3, and L4 fields that identify a particular VR micro-flow along with state indicating whether to hardware or software forward packets belonging to the micro-flow. Ingress system 602 generates an index (e.g., flow classification index 304 (
In an embodiment of the present invention, when programmed for table lookup mode, PFE 600 classifies an IP packet by performing an IP destination address route look-up from the IP Prefix Table. In one embodiment, the IP Prefix Table may include a 16M entry first level IP prefix table indexed by the upper 24-bits of the IP destination address and some number of 256-entry IP prefix sub-tables indexed by the lower 8-bits of IP destination address. A prefix table entry may include either a transform cache index or a pointer to a prefix sub-table. The state of the table entry's Next Table field determines the format of the table entry. When the NextTable bit is set to ‘1’, the bottom 31 bits of the entry indicate the address to the next-level table. When the NextTable bit is set to ‘0’, the bottom bits of the entry indicate the forwarding index, and whether or not to send packets to software. The host software can steer packets with particular IP prefixes to the CPU by setting the Software Only field in the table leaf entries.
In an embodiment of the present invention, when programmed for table lookup mode and the protocol field of the ingress switch fabric header contains MPLS bit set, PFE 600 classifies a packet by performing a table lookup based on the packet's 20-bit MPLS label. In this embodiment, there may be two tables—one for when the MPLS BOS bit isn't set and one for when the MPLS BOS bit is set. Each of the table's 1M entries contains the 20-bit forwarding index, and a bit to direct packets to the CPU.
In an embodiment of the present invention, PFE 600 maintains a table of transform control blocks (TCBs), which direct how the egress controller may process outgoing-packets. The egress controller uses a forwarding index, carried by the DMA descriptor, to select a transform control block from the table before processing packets. To update a TCB, host software may send a control packet containing a message with an address parameter that points to the new TCB. Software may issue the TCB update control packet before issuing the packet being forwarded. This may ensure that the forwarded packet is processed according to the updated TCB.
In an embodiment of the present invention, some fields may be used to maintain packet order and associate the TCB with a specific flow. In flow mode where several new packets for a flow could be sent to the CPU there is a danger that once the CPU updates the TCB and FCB a packet could be hardware forwarded while the CPU still has packets for that flow. Packet order may be enforced by the TCB. When the TCB is written the DropCpuPkt bit should be zero, this may allow the CPU to send the NEW packets it has for that flow. However when the first FWD_HW packet is seen with this bit clear, the forward engine may update the TCB and set this bit. Subsequent packets from the CPU (recognized because they are marked FWD_HW_COH) may be dropped. There may also be a consistency check performed between the FCB and the TCB. On ingress the SF header SrcChan is replaced with the PendingTag field of the FCB, on egress the SrcChan is compared against the FCBTag field of the TCB. If the tags mismatch the packet is dropped. For prefix mode the SrcChan is replaced with zero, and the FCBTag field may be initialized to zero.
In an embodiment of the present invention, packet header transformation involves the replacement of some number of header bytes of an ingress packet with some number of bytes of replacement header data. Under the control of a TCB, egress system 604 may selectively replace and recompute specific fields in a small set of protocol headers. Egress system 604 begins the header transform by stripping the incoming packet's SF header along with the number of bytes indicated by the SF header offset field. At that point, the controller may begin copying bytes from the buffer pointed to by the TCB's HDRPTR field into the egress packet buffer. PFE 600 may copy the number of new header bytes defined by the TCB's HDRLEN field. After performing this header replacement, PFE 600 then goes through the TCB enable bits to determine what other header transformations need to be made.
Egress system 604 may perform a network address translation (NAT) for IP addresses and for TCP/UDP port addresses. When software enables IP or TCP/UDP NAT, it may also provide the associated replacement addresses and checksum adjustments in the corresponding TCB fields. When the hardware detects one of the NAT enable bits may be set to ‘1’, it may replace both the source and destination addresses. If software intends to translate only the source address, it may still supply the correct destination address in the TCB replacement field. Similarly, the software may also supply the correct source address in the TCB replacement field when it is just replacing the destination address. A checksum adjustment may also be computed.
On the ingress side, layer two packets may be distinguished by bit five of the SF header protocol field being set. Micro-code checks this bit and jumps to separate L2 header loading logic when it is set. Separate code-points for each L2/L3 protocol are defined in the SF spec, jumping to the proper parsing logic is done by using the entire SF protocol (including the L2 bit) field as an index into a jump table and jumping to that instruction which causes a jump to the proper code segment. One of the functions of the L2 parsing logic is to determine the size of the variable length L2 headers and increment the SF offset field by that amount (in some cases, such as de-tunneling 2.sup.nd pass) so that egress system 604 may strip off that part of the header. In addition the SF protocol field may be changed (also 2.sup.nd pass de-tunneling) to another protocol type depending what the underlying packet type is, this may also be determined by the parsing logic and causes the proper egress code path to be taken.
The foregoing description of specific embodiments reveals the general nature of the invention sufficiently that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt it for various applications without departing from the generic concept. Therefore such adaptations and modifications are within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. The phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Accordingly, the invention embraces all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents and variations as fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/633,981, filed Feb. 27, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,407,449, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/172,222, filed Feb. 4, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,014,186, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/092,962, filed Apr. 24, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,644,311, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/849,352, filed on Sep. 3, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,933,269, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/298,815 filed on Nov. 18, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,266,120, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,311, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4590468 | Stieglitz | May 1986 | A |
4667287 | Allen et al. | May 1987 | A |
5371852 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5442708 | Adams et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5473599 | Li et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5490252 | Macera et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5581705 | Passint et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5633866 | Callon | May 1997 | A |
5745778 | Alfieri | Apr 1998 | A |
5812819 | Rodwin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825772 | Dobbins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825891 | Levesque et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841973 | Kessler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875290 | Bartfai et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881236 | Dickey | Mar 1999 | A |
5892924 | Lyon et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920702 | Lyon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963555 | Takase et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964847 | Booth et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987521 | Arrowood et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014382 | Takihiro et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014669 | Slaughter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032193 | Sullivan | Feb 2000 | A |
6047330 | Stracke | Apr 2000 | A |
6058429 | Ames et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069895 | Ayandeh | May 2000 | A |
6081508 | West et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085238 | Yuasa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098110 | Witkowski et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108699 | Moiin | Aug 2000 | A |
6118791 | Fichou et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134226 | Reed et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137777 | Vaid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147970 | Troxel | Nov 2000 | A |
6169739 | Isoyama | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169793 | Godwin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172980 | Flander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172991 | Moir | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173399 | Gilbrech | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175867 | Taghadoss | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6220768 | Barroux | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226296 | Lindsey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226788 | Schoening et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243580 | Garner | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246682 | Roy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249519 | Rangachar | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256295 | Callon | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260072 | Rodriguez | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260073 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266695 | Huang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278708 | Von Hammerstein et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286038 | Reichmeyer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295297 | Lee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298130 | Galvin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330602 | Law et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338092 | Chao et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6397253 | Quinlan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405262 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414595 | Scrandis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434619 | Lim et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438612 | Ylonen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449650 | Wesffall et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453406 | Samikowski et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463061 | Rekhter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466976 | Alles et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493349 | Casey | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526056 | Rekhter et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532088 | Dantu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542502 | Herring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549954 | Lambrecht et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556544 | Lee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556547 | Srinkanth et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597956 | Aziz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608816 | Nichols | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609153 | Salkewicz | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611522 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614792 | Pazy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625156 | Shaio et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633571 | Sakamoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636516 | Yamano | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639897 | Shiomoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640248 | Jorgensen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658013 | de Boer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665725 | Dietz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668282 | Lindsey et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674756 | Rao et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680922 | Jorgensen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694437 | Pao et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697359 | George | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697360 | Gai et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6732314 | Borella et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738371 | Ayres | May 2004 | B1 |
6754662 | Li | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769124 | Schoening et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775267 | Kung | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6820210 | Daruwalla et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822958 | Branth et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6839348 | Tang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859454 | Bowes | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862279 | Imai et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868082 | Allen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6883170 | Garcia | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6914907 | Bhardwaj et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6920146 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922774 | Meushaw et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938097 | Vincent | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944128 | Nichols | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944168 | Paatela et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954429 | Horton et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6982984 | Asayesh et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6982987 | Cain | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985438 | Tschudin | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6985956 | Luke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990103 | Gollamudi | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7002965 | Cheriton | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7012919 | So et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016351 | Farinacci | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020143 | Zdan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028333 | Tuomenoska et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042848 | Santiago et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046665 | Walrand et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054311 | Norman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058716 | Sundaresan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062570 | Hong et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062642 | Langrind et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7082477 | Sadhasivam et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7089293 | Gronser et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096383 | Talaugon et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096495 | Warrier et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7111072 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7116665 | Balay et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116679 | Ghahremani | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7117530 | Lin | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7139271 | Parruck et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145898 | Elliott | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7159031 | Larkin et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7161904 | Hussain et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174372 | Sarkar | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7177311 | Hussain et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181547 | Millet | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181766 | Bendinelli et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187676 | DiMambro | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203192 | Desai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7263106 | Matthews et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225259 | Ho et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246245 | Twomey | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263091 | Woo et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7266120 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272643 | Sarkar et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7278055 | Talugon et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313614 | Considine et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7337221 | Radi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340535 | Alam | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7359404 | Allan | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7376125 | Hussain et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376827 | Jiao | May 2008 | B1 |
7386010 | Solomon et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389358 | Matthews | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7444398 | Matthews | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7463633 | Endo et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7499419 | Balay et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522604 | Hussain et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539134 | Bowes | May 2009 | B1 |
7580373 | Millet | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7668087 | Hussain et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7688853 | Santiago et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7720053 | Hussain et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7746873 | Saito | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7881244 | Balay et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7933269 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8213347 | Balay et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8250357 | Sun et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260918 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8369258 | Balay et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8583800 | Matthews et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8644311 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8650390 | Sun et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8953513 | Balay et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9124555 | Sun et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9143351 | Millet | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9160716 | Sun et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9185050 | Desai et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9509638 | Desai et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9667604 | Sun et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9967200 | Hussain et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9998337 | Millet | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20010023456 | Nakashima | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010043571 | Jang et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048661 | Clear et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052013 | Munguia et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055303 | Horton et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020049902 | Rhodes | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062344 | Ylonen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066034 | Schlossberg et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075901 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097872 | Barbas et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099849 | Alfieri et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116529 | Hayden | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120720 | Moir | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122387 | Ni | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145981 | Klinker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152373 | Sun | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165981 | Basturk et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184387 | Yamaya et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186661 | Santiago et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186667 | Mor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191604 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033401 | Poisson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063348 | Posey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081559 | Matuoka et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091021 | Trossen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093557 | Giraud et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108041 | Aysan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115308 | Best et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117954 | De Neve et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120806 | Clune et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126233 | Bryers | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131228 | Twomey | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169747 | Wang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185221 | Deikman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200295 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212735 | Hicok et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223361 | Hussain et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223406 | Balay | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006601 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037279 | Zelig et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042416 | Ngo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066782 | Nassar | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078772 | Balay | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095934 | Cheng et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040141521 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050018609 | Dally et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050047407 | Desai | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083927 | Lien et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050147095 | Guerrero et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163115 | Dontu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060087969 | Santiago et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060265519 | Millet | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070058648 | Millet | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064704 | Balay | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073733 | Matthews | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083528 | Matthews et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104119 | Sarkar | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109968 | Hussain | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110062 | Balay et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115979 | Balay | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121579 | Matthews | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127382 | Hussain | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147368 | Desai | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070291755 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080013470 | Kopplin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016389 | Talugon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080259936 | Hussain et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046728 | Matthews et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073977 | Hussain et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090225754 | Balay et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225759 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100142527 | Balay et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110122872 | Balay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110200044 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120170578 | Anumala et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120324216 | Sun et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324532 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130156033 | Balay et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140177631 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150019859 | Sun et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150095636 | Sun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150195098 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160021072 | Sun et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160308788 | Desai et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170104638 | Millet | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1050181 | Nov 2007 | EP |
0051290 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0076152 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0163809 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0223855 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0310323 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/184,897 dated Jan. 26, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/828,277 dated Dec. 14, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520 dated Jul. 26, 2012. |
Final Rejection or U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520 dated Feb. 11, 2009. |
Non-Final Rejection or U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520 dated May 30, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,883 dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
Non-Final Rejection or U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520 dated Mar. 14, 2005. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,797 dated Sep. 1, 2015. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,727 dated Jun. 17, 2013. |
Dennis Fowler; “VPNs Become a Virtual Reality”; Netnews, Apr./May 1998. pp. 1-4. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,215 dated Jul. 15, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,727 dated Oct. 30, 2013. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,094 dated Jun. 14, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/385,492 dated Jan. 29, 2018. |
Lawrence, J. Lang et al.“Connecting Remote FDDI Installations with Single-Mode Fiber, Dedicated Lines, or SMDS.” Jul. 1990; ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 20, Issue 3; pp. 72-82. |
IEEE Potentials Publication; “Local Area Networks” Dec. 1995/Jan. 1996; pp. 6. http://www.ece.uc.edu/-paw/potentials/sample. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,483. |
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,636. |
Office Action dated May 28, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,636. |
Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2003 U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,636. |
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,130. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/067,106. |
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/067,106. |
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,483. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,483. |
Office Action dated May 5, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated May 14, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,485. |
Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated May 17, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated May 6, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,484. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/894,471. |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/894,471. |
Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/894,471. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/771,346. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,162. |
Office Action dated May 5, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,162. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,261. |
Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,261. |
Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 29, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,079. |
Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,079. |
Office Action dated May 17, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,079. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,815. |
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,815. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,016 dated Dec. 8, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,094 dated Sep. 21, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/192,115 dated Sep. 25, 2017. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 15/385,492 dated Aug. 30, 2017. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 15/071,097 dated Sep. 27, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,352 dated Jun. 16, 2010. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,352 dated Jul. 17, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,962 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,962 dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,222 dated Jan. 30, 2015. |
Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,669. |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,669. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 14, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,071. |
Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated May 18, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/163,260. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/661,637. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,520, dated May 30, 2008. |
Fowler, D., “VPNs Become a Virtual Reality.” Netnews, Apr./May 1998. pp. 1-4. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/556,697, dated Jul. 9, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/663,457, dated Jul. 15, 2008. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,970, dated Jul. 15, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/650,298, dated Sep. 3, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,969, dated Sep. 22, 2008. |
Chan, Mun C. et al., “An architecture for broadband virtual networks under customer control.” IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. Apr. 1996. pp. 135-144. |
Chan, Mun C. et al “Customer Management and Control of Broadband VPN Services.” Proc. Fifth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium of Integrated Network Management. May 1997. pp. 301-314. |
Gasparro, D.M., “Next-Gen VPNs: The Design Challenge.” Data Communications. Sep. 1999. pp. 83-95. |
Hanaki, M. et al., “LAN/WAN management integration using ATM CNM interface.” IEEE Network Operations Management Symposium, vol. 1. Apr. 1996. pp. 12-21. |
Kapustka, S., “CoSine Communications Move VPNs ‘Into the Cloud’ with the Leading Managed IP Service Delivery Platform.” http://wwwcosinecom.com/news/pr_5_24.html. Press Release, CoSine Communications. 1995. p. 5. |
Keshav, S., “An Engineering Approach to Computer Networking: ATM networks, the internet, and the telephone network.” Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series. 1992. pp. 318-324. |
Kim, E.C. et al., “The Multi-Layer VPN Management Architecture.” Proc. Sixth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management. May 1999. pp. 187-200. |
Rao, J.R., Intranets and VPNs: Strategic Approach. 1988 Annual Review of Communications. 1998. pp. 669-674. |
Tanenbaum, A.S., “Computer Networks.” Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall PTR, 3rd Edition. 1996. pp. 348-364. |
European Search Report for PCT/US03/37009 (dated Jul. 4, 2004) 2 pgs. |
International Search Report for PCTUS03/17674. 6 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,858 dated May 25, 2012. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,858, dated Dec. 6, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,858, dated Apr. 15, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/949,943 dated Jan. 9, 2009. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/949,943 dated Feb. 14, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/467,304 dated Dec. 13, 2010. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/467,304 dated Oct. 18, 2010. |
Tsiang et al. “RFC 2892, The Cisco SRP MAC Layer Protocol.” Aug. 2000, pp. 1-52. |
Zhang et al. “Token Ring Arbitration Circuits for Dynamic Priority Algorithms” IEEE, 1995, pp. 74-77. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,880 dated Dec. 5, 2012. |
Non-Final Rejection for for U.S. Appl. No. 13/015,880 dated Oct. 2, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/756,071 dated Jun. 30, 2014. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/756,071 dated Jun. 6, 2014. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/633,981 dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,222 dated Nov. 21, 2014. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 15/184,897 dated Sep. 29, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/071,995 dated Oct. 24, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,016 dated Apr. 25, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160285743 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14633981 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15180394 | US | |
Parent | 14172222 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14633981 | US | |
Parent | 13092962 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 14172222 | US | |
Parent | 11849352 | Sep 2007 | US |
Child | 13092962 | US | |
Parent | 10298815 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 11849352 | US |