Hardware architecture for universal testing system: wireless router test

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10320651
  • Patent Number
    10,320,651
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 30, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 11, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A hardware architecture for a universal testing system used for performing Wifi tests on wireless devices under test (DUT) is disclosed. According to certain embodiments, test information travels from a Wifi port of the test server to the Wifi port's antenna in a Faraday cage, and then travels over the air to DUT's Wifi antenna in the same Faraday cage, and then to a LAN Ethernet port of the DUT, and then to the test server's Ethernet port.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,630, entitled “Universal Device Testing System,” filed Sep. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,960,989, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,720, entitled “Core Testing Machine,” filed Sep. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,810,735, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,752, entitled “Universal Device Testing Interface,” filed Sep. 25, 2015 and published Mar. 30, 2017 as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2017/0093683, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,780, entitled “Set Top Boxes Under Test,” filed Sep. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,491,454, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/929,180, entitled “Hardware Architecture for Universal Testing System: Cable Modem Test,” filed Oct. 30, 2015 and published May 4, 2017 as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2017/0126536, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/948,143, entitled “Cable Modems/eMTAs Under Test,” filed Nov. 20, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,992,084, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/948,925, entitled “Wireless Routers Under Test,” filed Nov. 23, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,838,295, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/987,538, entitled “Test Sequences Using Universal Testing System,” filed Jan. 4, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,900,116.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is directed to a system for testing devices.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a high-level hardware architecture of a universal testing system for wireless routers tests, according to certain embodiments.



FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B are high-level schematics of a front view of a set of Faraday cages of a universal testing system, according to certain embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a high level schematic that illustrates the connectivity features of backplates (also known as backplanes) of physical slots to test servers, according to certain embodiments.



FIG. 4 is a high-level schematic of connectivity of a given DUT with a MOCA LAN harness and a MOCA WAN harness, according to certain embodiments.



FIG. 5 is a high-level schematic that illustrates a Wifi test hardware setup, according to certain embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Methods, systems, user interfaces, and other aspects of the invention are described. Reference will be made to certain embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to these particular embodiments alone. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents that are within the spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.


Moreover, in the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the invention may be practiced without these particular details. In other instances, methods, procedures, components, and networks that are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art are not described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 1 illustrates a high-level hardware architecture of a universal testing system for wireless routers tests, according to certain embodiments. FIG. 1 shows a test station 100 that includes a test control computer 102 (test controller), a plurality of test servers 104a-104n, non-limiting examples of user interfaces that can include touch screen display 106, bar code scanners/keyboard/mouse (112), a remote tablet 108. Each of the plurality of test servers 104a-104n is associated with four Faraday cages/physical test slots. In each of the several physical test slots can be installed a device (e.g., wireless router) to be tested. Each installed device in the various physical slots is also referred to as a device under test (DUT). For ease of explanation and to avoid overcrowding the drawing of FIG. 1, FIG. 1 shows only one of the Faraday cages 114/test slots. Each Faraday cage/test slot 114 is associated with a MOCA Wan harness 120, a MOCA LAN harness 122 and a radio frequency (RF) splitter 124. According to certain embodiments, MOCA LAN harness 122 is connected to RF splitter 124 via RF cable 126b. MOCA WAN harness 120 is connected to RF splitter 124 via RF cable 126a. RF splitter 124 is connected to Faraday cage/test slot 114 via COAX cable 126c. Faraday cage/test slot 114 has Ethernet connections to its associated test server. MOCA LAN harness 122 also has an Ethernet connection 129 to the associated test server. MOCA WAN harness 120 also has an Ethernet connection 128 to the associated test server. Test control computer 102 and test servers 104a-104n have a LAN 130 (Local Area Network) connection to a firewall/gateway/router 110, which in turn is connected to a WAN 132 (Wide Area Network). A user can optionally use remote wireless tablet 108 to interface with test station 100 remotely through a wireless communication 134 to firewall/gateway/router 110. According to certain embodiments, the firewall isolates the test framework of the testing system.


According to certain embodiments, the testing system comprises at least one test station. According to certain embodiments, each test station includes a plurality of Faraday cages/physical test slots. As a non-limiting example, a subset of the plurality of physical test slots is associated with a test server. As a non-limiting example, a test station may have plurality of test servers, each of which is associated with four Faraday cages/physical test slots. Further, embodiments are not restricted to four Faraday cages/physical test slots per test server. The number of test servers, Faraday cages/test slots may vary from implementation to implementation. According to certain embodiments, each test server includes virtualization containers that act as probes for testing devices installed in the physical slots in the test station.


According to certain embodiments, several wireless devices can be tested simultaneously in the test station.


According to certain embodiments, the user interface can communicate through web sockets with the test system. Such communication is in real-time, bidirectional and asynchronous so that the user can control and monitor the testing of multiple devices simultaneously and independently of each other using the same universal testing system.


According to certain embodiments, the testing system is capable of testing a set of similar types of devices or a set of disparate devices.


According to certain embodiments, test controller 102 is a computer subsystem that manages the user interfaces of the testing system. Thus, at least the following devices are connected to test controller 102: touch screen display 106, and bar code scanners/keyboard/mouse 112.


According to certain embodiments, touch screen display 106 is a touch-enabled screen that senses user/operator inputs for a given DUT. For example, each DUT is represented on the touch screen display as a window that includes test related information such as test progress and test results. As another non-limiting example, a user/operator can use touch screen display 106 to input light emitting diode (LED) status (is the LED lit or not lit) when the user/operator is prompted for inputs as part of the testing procedure of a given DUT.


According to certain embodiments, one or more the bar code scanners 112 can be used to read DUT information such as serial number of the DUT, and default Wifi passwords associated with the given DUT. Such information is needed to conduct testing on the given DUT.


According to certain embodiments, test controller 102 includes an Ethernet interface to connect to the plurality of test servers 104a-104n. Test controller 102 communicates with the plurality of test servers 104a-104n using such an Ethernet interface in order to conduct tests on the various DUTs that are installed in test station 100.


According to certain embodiments, keyboard/mouse 112 are part of test controller 102 and can be used by the user/operator to input data needed to run the tests on the various DUTs installed in test station 100.


According to certain embodiments, each test server of the plurality of test servers 104a-104n provides interfaces (hardware ports) needed to conduct one or more tests on the DUTs. Depending on the type of test, a given test may need a single port or multiple ports as part of the test infrastructure. According to certain embodiments, such ports are controlled by virtualization containers at the test servers.


According to certain embodiments, a given test server includes the following devices: PCI/PCI Express/Mini PCI Express slots, Ethernet connectivity hardware and software.


According to certain embodiments, the PCI/PCI Express/Mini PCI Express slots allow Wifi cards to be installed on a given test server to provide Wifi connectivity in order to perform Wifi tests on the DUTs. Such slots can also be used to install Ethernet cards to provide Ethernet ports in order to perform tests on the DUTs. According to certain embodiments, such PCI/PCI Express/Mini PCI Express slots can host a set of ports that can be associated with a corresponding set of virtualization containers on the test servers. Such virtualization containers are used for testing various features on the DUTs such as Wifi, LAN, WAN, or MoCa interfaces of a given DUT.


According to certain embodiments, the voice port associated with the FXO card is used for testing VoIP connection and functions.


According to certain embodiments, Ethernet connectivity hardware and software are provided in order to connect the test controller computer to the plurality of test servers for controlling the plurality of test servers.


According to certain embodiments, the test servers run test scripts to perform one or more tests such as: 1) testing Ethernet data throughput speeds, 2) testing WiFi throughput speeds, 3) testing MOCA throughput speeds, 4) testing voice over IP (VOIP) connections and functions, 5) testing MIMO (multi input, multi output) antenna technology, according to certain embodiments. According to certain embodiments, the test servers use virtualization containers to run such tests.



FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B are high-level schematics of a front view of a set of Faraday cages/test slots of a universal testing system, according to certain embodiments. FIG. 2A shows a number of physical slots, such as slots 202a, 202b, 202c, 202d, 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d. Each slot has a backplate (202ab, 202bb, 202cd, 202db, 204ab, 204bb, 204cd, 204db). Backplates are also known as backplanes.


Similarly, FIG. 2B shows a number of physical slots, such as slots 206a, 206b, 206c, 206d, 208a, 208b, 208c, 208d. Each slot has a backplate (206ab, 206bb, 206cd, 206db, 208ab, 208bb, 208cd, 208db). Sample backplates are described herein with reference to FIG. 3 herein.



FIG. 3 is a high-level schematic that illustrates the connectivity features of backplates of physical slots relative to test servers, according to certain embodiments. For ease of explanation, FIG. 3 shows the connectivity of one backplate of the plurality of backplates to one test server of the plurality of test servers in the universal testing system, according to certain embodiments. As previously described, there are a plurality of test servers and a plurality of slots (and corresponding backplates) per test server, according to certain embodiments.



FIG. 3 shows a backplate 302 associated with a give slot that is, in turn, associated with a test server 304 in the universal testing system. Backplate 302 includes but is not limited to a power supply port 306, a set of ports 308, a subset of which are Ethernet ports 308a, a set of coaxial ports 310, a set of voice ports 312, and a set of Wifi ports (314, 316). Server 304 includes but is not limited to a master Internet port 330, a set of Ethernet card ports 332a-g, of which 4 ports (332a-d) are Ethernet LAN ports, one Ethernet MOCA LAN port 332e, one Ethernet MOCA WAN port 332f, and one DUT WAN port 332g. Test server 304 also includes a set of WiFi card ports 340a-d. One or more of the WiFi card ports 340a-d can be associated with a Wifi virtualization container on test server 304 for use in Wifi tests of the DUT, according to certain embodiments.


According to certain embodiments, port P3 of Ethernet ports 308a is associated with port P1 of Ethernet card ports 332a. Similarly, port P4 of Ethernet ports 308a is associated with port P2 of Ethernet card ports 332a. Port P5 of Ethernet ports 308a is associated with port P3 of Ethernet card ports 332a. Port P6 of Ethernet ports 308a is associated with port P4 of Ethernet card ports 332a.


According to certain embodiments, Wifi port 314 is associated with an antenna 314a and is also associated with port P2 of Wifi card port 340d via Wifi cable 314b, for example. Wifi port 316 is associated with an antenna 316a and is also associated with port P1 of Wifi card port 340d via Wifi cable 316b.


According to certain embodiments, a given DUT that is installed in a given slot is connected via coaxial ports 310 to the MOCA WAN Ethernet port (332f) and MOCA LAN Ethernet port (332e) via a corresponding MOCA WAN harness and a MOCA LAN harness, described in greater detail below.



FIG. 4 is a high-level schematic of connectivity of a given DUT (installed in a given slot) to a MOCA LAN harness and a MOCA WAN harness, according to certain embodiments. FIG. 4 shows MOCA WAN harness 120 and MOCA LAN harness 122 that are used for testing the MOCA WAN interface and the MOCA LAN interface, respectively, of DUT 402. MOCA WAN harness 120 and MOCA LAN harness 122 are connected to a power splitter 124 via RF cable 126a and RF cable 126b, respectively, according to certain embodiments. Power splitter 124 connects the MOCA LAN and MOCA WAN to DUT 402 via RF cable 126c. According to certain embodiments, MOCA WAN harness 120 is also connected via Ethernet cable 128 to an Ethernet port 412 of a test server, where such an Ethernet port 412 is associated with a virtualization container on the test server. Similarly, MOCA LAN harness 122 is also connected via Ethernet cable 129 to an Ethernet port 408 of a test server, where such an Ethernet port 408 is associated with a virtualization container on the test server, according to certain embodiments. Further, DUT 402 is also connected to the test server via RF cable 418 to an Ethernet port 410 of the server that is associated with a virtualization container.


For example, test information (and/or other related information) can flow from Ethernet port 410 (and associated virtualization container) to DUT 402 and then to the MOCA LAN interface of MOCA LAN harness 122 and then to Ethernet port 408 (and associated virtualization container). Test information (and/or other related information) can also flow from Ethernet port 408 (and associated virtualization container) to the MOCA LAN interface of MOCA LAN harness 122, and then to DUT 402, and then to Ethernet port 410 (and associated virtualization container).


Similarly, test information (and other related information) can flow from Ethernet port 410 (and associated virtualization container) to DUT 402 and then to the MOCA WAN interface of MOCA WAN harness 120 and then to Ethernet port 412 (and associated virtualization container). Test information (and/or other related information) can also flow from Ethernet port 412 (and associated virtualization container) to the MOCA WAN interface of MOCA WAN harness 120, and then to DUT 402, and then to Ethernet port 410 (and associated virtualization container).



FIG. 5 is a high-level schematic that illustrates a Wifi test hardware setup, according to certain embodiments. FIG. 5 shows a Faraday cage 502 and a DUT 504. FIG. 5 also shows a Wifi antenna 506 that is associated with a Wifi card port (510) of a given test server. According to certain embodiments, such a Wifi card port (510) is associated with a virtualization container on the given test server. Such a virtualization container is for running Wifi tests on the DUT. According to certain embodiments, Wifi antenna 506 is in Faraday cage 502 along with the DUT's Wifi antenna 505. DUT 504 may be placed inside Faraday cage 502 or outside Faraday cage 502. FIG. 5 also shows that one of the LAN Ethernet ports of the DUT is connected via Ethernet cable 512 to the test server's Ethernet port (508), which in turn is associated with a virtualization container for handling such an Ethernet port. As a non-limiting example, test information (and other related information) can be sent via RF cable from Wifi card port 510 to antenna 506. The data then travels over the air to antenna 505 (DUT's Wifi antenna), and then to LAN Ethernet port of the DUT, and then to the test server's Ethernet port (508) via Ethernet cable 512. Thus, the test server can perform Wifi test information measurements.


In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to numerous specific details that may vary from implementation to implementation. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A test system for simultaneously and independently testing a plurality of wireless devices under test, the test system comprising: a test controller for managing user interfaces associated with the test system;a test server connected to the test controller; anda plurality of faraday cages, each faraday cage of the plurality of faraday cages configured to receive a wireless device under test of a plurality of wireless devices under test and having associated with it a set of ports for connecting a faraday cage to a wireless device under test associated with the faraday cage and to the test server, each set of ports comprising: a wireless port associated with an antenna internal to the faraday cage and connected to a wireless port on the test server, the wireless port on the test server being associated with a virtualization container for running wireless tests,a radio frequency port associated with a radio frequency port on an associated wireless device under test, anda networking port associated with a networking port on the associated wireless device under test and connected to a networking port on the test server, the networking port on the test server being associated with a virtualization container for running networking tests,wherein the test controller employs web sockets to communicate with the test server such that the plurality of devices under test may be tested simultaneously and independently of each other and that the communication between the user interfaces and the test server is real-time, bidirectional, and asynchronous.
  • 2. The test system of claim 1, further comprising: a Multimedia Over Coax Alliance (MoCA) Wide Area Network (WAN) harness associated with a networking port on the test server,a MoCA Local Areas Network (LAN) harness associated with a networking port on the test server,a splitter connected to the MoCA WAN harness, the MoCA LAN harness, and the radio frequency port on the faraday cage.
  • 3. The test system of claim 1, wherein the radio frequency port on the associated wireless device under test comprises a coaxial cable connector.
  • 4. The test system of claim 1, wherein each of the networking ports comprises an Ethernet port.
  • 5. The test system of claim 1, further comprising: at least one user interface device in communication with the test controller.
  • 6. The test system of claim 1, wherein a wireless signal test path is from the wireless port on the test server to the wireless port on the Faraday cage to the antenna internal to the Faraday cage to an antenna of the wireless device under test to the networking port of the wireless device under test to the networking port of the test server.
US Referenced Citations (161)
Number Name Date Kind
5005197 Parsons et al. Apr 1991 A
5897609 Choi et al. Apr 1999 A
5910977 Torregrossa Jun 1999 A
5917808 Koshbab Jun 1999 A
6088582 Canora et al. Jul 2000 A
6308496 Lee Oct 2001 B1
6367032 Kasahara Apr 2002 B1
6662135 Burns Dec 2003 B1
6671160 Hayden Dec 2003 B2
6826512 Dara-Abrams et al. Nov 2004 B2
6859043 Ewing Feb 2005 B2
7068757 Burnett Jun 2006 B1
7254755 De Obaldia et al. Aug 2007 B2
7664317 Sowerby Feb 2010 B1
7809517 Zuckerman Oct 2010 B1
8121028 Schlesener Feb 2012 B1
8209732 Le et al. Jun 2012 B2
8229344 Petersen Jul 2012 B1
8324909 Oakes et al. Dec 2012 B2
8418000 Salame Apr 2013 B1
8418219 Parsons et al. Apr 2013 B1
8515015 Maffre Aug 2013 B2
8689071 Valakh Apr 2014 B2
8806400 Bhawmik Aug 2014 B1
9013307 Hussain Apr 2015 B2
9270983 Hare, Jr. Feb 2016 B1
9316714 Rada Apr 2016 B2
9319908 Nickel Apr 2016 B2
9372228 Nickel Jun 2016 B2
9402601 Berger Aug 2016 B1
9490920 Partee Nov 2016 B2
9491454 Kumar Nov 2016 B1
9571211 Partee Feb 2017 B2
9602556 Cham Mar 2017 B1
9609063 Zhu Mar 2017 B2
9810735 Kumar et al. Nov 2017 B2
9838295 Kumar et al. Dec 2017 B2
9900113 Kumar et al. Feb 2018 B2
9900116 Kumar et al. Feb 2018 B2
9960989 Kumar et al. May 2018 B2
9992084 Kumar et al. Jun 2018 B2
10116397 Kumar et al. Oct 2018 B2
10122611 Kumar et al. Nov 2018 B2
10158553 Tiwari et al. Dec 2018 B2
10230617 Kumar et al. Mar 2019 B2
20020070725 Hilliges Jun 2002 A1
20020077786 Vogel et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030005380 Nguyen Jan 2003 A1
20030184035 Yu Oct 2003 A1
20040010584 Peterson Jan 2004 A1
20040016708 Rafferty Jan 2004 A1
20040160226 Ewing Aug 2004 A1
20040189281 Le et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040203726 Wei Oct 2004 A1
20050041642 Robinson Feb 2005 A1
20050053008 Griesing Mar 2005 A1
20050102488 Bullis May 2005 A1
20050193294 Hildebrant Sep 2005 A1
20050249196 Ansari et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050286466 Tagg Dec 2005 A1
20060015785 Chun Jan 2006 A1
20060271322 Haggerty Nov 2006 A1
20070097659 Behrens May 2007 A1
20070220380 Ohanyan Sep 2007 A1
20080026748 Alexander et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080117907 Hein May 2008 A1
20080144293 Aksamit Jun 2008 A1
20080159737 Noble et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168520 Vanderhoff Jul 2008 A1
20080274712 Rofougaran Nov 2008 A1
20080315898 Cannon Dec 2008 A1
20090059933 Huang Mar 2009 A1
20090089854 Le Apr 2009 A1
20090213738 Volpe et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090282446 Breed Nov 2009 A1
20090282455 Bell et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090289020 Wurmhoringer Nov 2009 A1
20100132000 Straub May 2010 A1
20100138823 Thornley Jun 2010 A1
20100246416 Sinha Sep 2010 A1
20100281107 Fallows et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110001833 Grinkemeyer Jan 2011 A1
20110006794 Sellathamby Jan 2011 A1
20110012632 Merrow Jan 2011 A1
20110035676 Tischer Feb 2011 A1
20110072306 Racey Mar 2011 A1
20110090075 Armitage et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099424 Rivera Trevino Apr 2011 A1
20110107074 Chan May 2011 A1
20110116419 Cholas May 2011 A1
20110149720 Phuah et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110222549 Connelly Sep 2011 A1
20110267782 Petrick Nov 2011 A1
20110306306 Reed Dec 2011 A1
20120140081 Clements Jan 2012 A1
20120122406 Gregg et al. May 2012 A1
20120163227 Kannan Jun 2012 A1
20120198084 Keskitalo Aug 2012 A1
20120198442 Kashyap Aug 2012 A1
20120213259 Renken et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220240 Rothschild Aug 2012 A1
20120275784 Soto Nov 2012 A1
20120278826 Jones Nov 2012 A1
20120306895 Faulkner et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130033279 Sozanski Feb 2013 A1
20130049794 Humphrey Feb 2013 A1
20130076217 Thompson Mar 2013 A1
20130093447 Nickel Apr 2013 A1
20130104158 Partee Apr 2013 A1
20130160064 Van Rozen Jun 2013 A1
20130167123 Dura Jun 2013 A1
20130257468 Mlinarsky Oct 2013 A1
20130305091 Stan et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140047322 Kim Feb 2014 A1
20140091874 Cook et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140115580 Kellerman Apr 2014 A1
20140123200 Park et al. May 2014 A1
20140126387 Gintis May 2014 A1
20140156819 Cavgalar Jun 2014 A1
20140187172 Partee Jul 2014 A1
20140187173 Partee Jul 2014 A1
20140207404 Fritzsche Jul 2014 A1
20140256373 Hernandez Sep 2014 A1
20140266930 Huynh Sep 2014 A1
20140269386 Chu Sep 2014 A1
20140269871 Huynh Sep 2014 A1
20140282783 Totten Sep 2014 A1
20140370821 Guterman Dec 2014 A1
20150024720 Efrati Jan 2015 A1
20150093987 Ouyang Apr 2015 A1
20150109941 Zhang Apr 2015 A1
20150151669 Meisner Jun 2015 A1
20150180743 Jana et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150226716 Nelson Aug 2015 A1
20150237010 Roskind Aug 2015 A1
20150253357 Olgaard Sep 2015 A1
20150288589 Radford et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150369851 Even Dec 2015 A1
20160080241 Rocha De Maria Mar 2016 A1
20160102951 Cole Apr 2016 A1
20160191364 Ajitomi Jun 2016 A1
20160381818 Mills Dec 2016 A1
20170048519 Friel Feb 2017 A1
20170089981 Kumar Mar 2017 A1
20170093682 Kumar Mar 2017 A1
20170093683 Kumar Mar 2017 A1
20170126536 Kumar May 2017 A1
20170126539 Tiwari May 2017 A1
20170149635 Kumar May 2017 A1
20170149645 Kumar May 2017 A1
20170195071 Kumar Jul 2017 A1
20170250762 Kumar et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170288791 Kumar et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170288993 Kumar et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170289012 Tiwari et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170302994 Kumar Oct 2017 A1
20180024193 Kumar et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180076908 Kumar et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180077046 Kumar et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180351846 Kumar et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190109778 Kumar et al. Apr 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
202261360 May 2012 CN
2001013604 Feb 2001 WO
2013169728 Nov 2013 WO
2014035462 Mar 2014 WO
2014065843 May 2014 WO
2017053961 Mar 2017 WO
2017074872 May 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (94)
Entry
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,780, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Oct. 19, 2016, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,780, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Jul. 19, 2016, 8 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,720, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Jan. 23, 2017, 17 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,538, filed Jan. 4, 2016, dated Mar. 23, 2017, 12 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,085, filed Feb. 29, 2016, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 15 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US16/53768, filed Sep. 26, 2016, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 17 pgs.
Nordman, Bruce, “Testing Products with Network Connectivity,” Jun. 21, 2011 [retrieved online at http://citeseerx.is1.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.695.772&rep=rep1&type=pdf on Feb. 6, 2017], 20 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/058507, filed Oct. 24, 2016, dated Jan. 3, 2017, 12 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Nov. 1, 2017, 42 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,752, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Nov. 7, 2017, 26 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,720, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,925, filed Nov. 23, 2015, dated Sep. 20, 2017, 15 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,925, filed Nov. 23, 2015, dated Oct. 5, 2017, 2 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,085, filed Feb. 29, 2016, dated Oct. 31, 2017, 6 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,085, filed Feb. 29, 2016, dated Sep. 29, 2017, 28 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,967, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Nov. 7, 2017, 52 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,630, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Dec. 20, 2017, 19 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,630, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 9 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,925, filed Nov. 23, 2015, dated Nov. 16, 2017, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,143, filed Nov. 20, 2015, dated Dec. 28, 2017, 39 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,143, filed Nov. 20, 2015, dated Jan. 25, 2018, 13 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,538, filed Jan. 4, 2016, dated Jan. 10, 2018, 8 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,538, filed Jan. 4, 2016, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,538, filed Jan. 4, 2016, dated Dec. 4, 2017, 20 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Response to Amendment under Rule 312 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,538, filed Jan. 4, 2016, dated Jan. 17, 2018, 2 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,961, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Jan. 10, 2018, 5 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,085, filed Feb. 29, 2016, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 1 pg.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Nov. 20, 2017, 53 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,630, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Aug. 9, 2017, 24 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,720, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 26 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,720, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Aug. 28, 2017, 11 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Response to Rule 312 Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,720, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Jul. 26, 2017, 2 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Ex-Parte Quayle Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,925, filed Nov. 23, 2015, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 29 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,538, filed Jan. 4, 2016, dated Jul. 21, 2017, 18 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,961, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Jul. 19, 2017, 7 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,180, filed Oct. 30, 2015, dated Aug. 22, 2017, 32 pgs.
Businesswire; Article entitled: “Genband and CTDI Settle Legal Dispute”, located at <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140321005528/en/GENBAND-CTDI-Settle-Legal-Dispute>, Mar. 21, 2014, 1 pg.
CED Magazine; Article entitled: “Cable Connects in Atlanta”, located at <https://www.cedmagazine.com/article/2006/04/Gable-connects-atlanta>, Apr. 30, 2006, 21 pgs.
TVtechnology; Article entitled: “S3 Group's StormTest”, located at <http://www.tvtechnology.com/expertise/0003/s3-groups-stormtest/256690>, published May 1, 2012, 2 pgs.
Digital Producer; Article entitled: “S3 Group Unveils Exclusive Partnership in North America With First US StormTest(TM) Decision Line Customer”, located at <http://www.digitalproducer.com/article/S3-Group-Unveils-Exclusive-Partnership-in-North-America-With-First-US-StormTest(TM)-Decision-Line-Customer--1668213>, Sep. 8, 2011, 3 pgs.
Electronic Design; Article entitled: “Testing of MPEG-2 Set-Top Boxes Must be Fast, Thorough”, located at <http://www.electronicdesign.com/print/839>, published Nov. 18, 2001, 9 pgs.
Euromedia; Article entitled: “Automated TV Client testing: Swisscom partners with S3 Group to deliver the ultimate IPTV experience”, located at <http://advanced-television.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/s3.pdf>, earliest known pub. date—May 30, 2013, 2 pgs.
Teleplan; Article entitled: “Screening & Testing”, located at <https://www.teleplan.com/innovative-services/screening-testing/>, earliest known publication date Mar. 21, 2015, 7 pgs.
Promptlink Communications; Article entitled: “Promptlink Communications Officially Launches Sep-Top Box Testing Platform”, located at <https://www.promptlink.com/company/assets/media/2014-05-20.pdf>, published on May 20, 2014, 2 pgs.
S3 Group; Document entitled: “White Paper: The Importance of Automated Testing in Set-Top Box Integration”, earliest known publication date Jun. 17, 2014, 11 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,752, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Jul. 10, 2018, 5 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,752, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated May 17, 2018, 16 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,143, filed Nov. 20, 2015, dated May 16, 2018, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,143, Nov. 20, 2015, dated May 7, 2018, 7 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,950, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Jul. 9, 2018, 50 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,961, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 7 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,961, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated May 22, 2018, 44 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,180, filed Oct. 30, 2015, dated May 8, 2018, 35 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Jul. 17, 2018, 8 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,967, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Jul. 17, 2018, 7 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,967, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated May 8, 2018, 40 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/058507, filed Oct. 24, 2016, dated May 11, 2018, 12 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,752, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Oct. 17, 2018, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, filed U.S. Appl. No. 15/722,235, dated Jan. 8, 2019, 62 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,838, filed Nov. 15, 2017, dated Jan. 9, 2019, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,950, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Dec. 20, 2018, 33 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,803, filed Nov. 21, 2017, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 20 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Dec. 4, 2018, 11 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,967, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Nov. 29, 2018, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Jul. 23, 2018, 18 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Oct. 2, 2018, 15 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,752, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Oct. 4, 2018, 5 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,838, filed Nov. 15, 2017, dated Oct. 2, 2018, 52 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,961, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 9 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,961, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Oct. 10, 2018, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,180, filed Oct. 30, 2015, dated Jul. 27, 2018, 9 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,180, filed Oct. 30, 2015, dated Oct. 1, 2018, 15 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,803, filed Nov. 21, 2017, dated Jan. 25, 2018, 46 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Aug. 24, 2018, 10 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,967, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Aug. 28, 2018, 6 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,967, filed Jun. 16, 2017, dated Sep. 19, 2018, 7 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 18 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,630, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Apr. 11, 2018, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,630, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Mar. 30, 2018, 6 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Certificate of Correction for U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,720, filed Sep. 25, 2015, dated Feb. 13, 2018, 1 pg.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Apr. 30, 2018, 34 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/053768, dated Sep. 26, 2016, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 13 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Apr. 10, 2019, 7 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Feb. 28, 2019, 11 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/642,915, filed Jul. 6, 2017, dated Mar. 25, 2019, 8 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/103,546, filed Mar. 25, 2019, dated Mar. 25, 2019, 7 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/103,546, filed Aug. 14, 2018, dated Apr. 9, 2019, 6 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/103,546, filed Aug. 14, 2018, dated Jan. 28, 2019, 36 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,838, filed Nov. 15, 2017, dated Feb. 12, 2019, 6 pgs.
Kumar, Samant; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,838, filed Nov. 15, 2017, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 1 pg.
Kumar, Samant; Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,803, filed Nov. 21, 2017, dated Feb. 5, 2019, 13 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 8 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Mar. 27, 2019, 13 pgs.
Tiwari, Rajeev; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,920, filed Nov. 10, 2016, dated Apr. 10, 2019, 1 pg.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170126537 A1 May 2017 US