1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to hardware-assisted program tracing, and more specifically to a processor and method that capture a call signature when a specified root instruction is executed, and optionally when the call signature also has a specified value.
2. Description of Related Art
Run-time program tracing software provides valuable insight as to the actual patterns of execution encountered during program execution. Such information can be used to selectively optimize program code and to inform developers of actual run-time conditions. Information gathered by profiling programs that study program execution can be used by systems' processes to adapt pre-fetching and for run-time optimization of program code organization and storage.
Hardware mechanisms have been used to assist in program tracing, such a branch history table (BHT) storage. The function of the BHT is to identify the program path leading up to an event, such as an interrupt, by including the addresses of the most-recent branch instructions for which the branch was taken leading up to the event. Software subsequently reads the BHT in order to identify the program path leading up to the event.
However, specific hardware mechanisms to support program tracing along specific program paths are not generally present in today's processors.
Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a processor and software that can cooperate to facilitate program tracing and profiling.
The invention is embodied in a method that computes and collects a program call signature within a processor, when a specified root instruction is executed. The method computes the program call signature during program execution to uniquely identify program trace segments between call and return pairs.
The processor includes a root instruction register that is programmed with a root instruction address. When the root instruction is about to be executed, control logic within the processor captures the call signature in a call signature register. The processor may have only a single register for storing the call signature, or multiple storage locations that can store multiple different call signatures. Program tracing software collects branch history information commencing at the root instruction, or at the root instruction only when the call signature matches a call signature stored in the call signature register, or one of the multiple call signature registers, which may be determined based on a selectable operating mode of the processor.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives, and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying Figures, wherein like reference numerals indicate like components, and:
The present invention relates to processors, methods and computer programs for tracing program execution using hardware-assisted program trace collection. The processor includes a register that is programmed with the address of a specified root instruction, and commences capture of branch history information once the root instruction is encountered. The processor also computes a signature that uniquely describes the subroutine call and return history and the value of the signature is captured when the root instruction is executed, in order to identify the sequence of function calls and returns that led to the root instruction. The processor may include a selectable operating mode that governs how capture of the signature is performed. In one operating mode, a program call signature is captured every time the root instruction is executed. After execution has proceeded long enough for the program to reach a steady-state condition, the processor waits for the root instruction to be executed again, and subsequently the taken branches are added to a buffer that stores the trace history. When the buffer fills, the process terminates and software is signaled, e.g., by an interrupt, and reads the branch history that has been collected. In another operating mode, the processor waits until the root instruction is executed and the program call signature matches a particular value before adding the taken branches subsequent to the root instruction to the buffer and then interrupting the program tracing software.
Referring now to
Processor 11A in workstation computer 10A is coupled to a storage interface 13, which couples processor 11A and memory 12A to storage devices such as hard disc drive 15 and an optical drive 14. Workstation computer 10A is coupled to hosting server 10B via a network interface 18, which may be a wired or wireless interface. Embodiments of the invention include computer program products that interact with the hardware facilities of the present invention, and are stored in memory 12A as well as stored on tangible media such as a CD-ROM 16 that may be inserted into optical drive 14 to transfer the profiling/debugging software, as well as other software components to memory 12A for execution by processor 11A, or in memory 12B for execution by processor 11B. Similar storage devices and interfaces may be provided within hosting server 10B for use in storing and retrieving program code in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The illustrated processing system also includes input/output (I/O) interfaces and devices 19 such as mice and keyboards for receiving user input and graphical displays for displaying information, such as user interfaces for controlling and examining the results of test code execution within test platform 20. While the system of
Referring now to
Processor core 20 includes a performance monitoring unit (PMU) 40 that, among other functions, maintains a branch history table 32 that collects program trace information. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, performance monitoring unit (PMU) 40 also includes a signature generator 49 that computes a program call signature at each function call and return, for use in identifying a current execution path of the program code being executed by processor core 20. The program call signature generating function is reversible and based upon the program instruction address of the call instruction, so that the current value of the program call signature, also referred to herein as the working call signature, is modified at execution of the call instruction, and then the modification is undone when the corresponding return instruction is executed. In the particular embodiment of the invention described herein, the address used is the program instruction address after the call instruction, i.e., the return address to which the corresponding return instruction directs execution. However, the call address or another related program instruction address could be used instead. Therefore, during a sequence of nested calls corresponding to a particular program execution path will have a signature determined from the program instruction addresses of the call instructions, but once execution has returned to the top level, the working call signature will be restored to its original value. An example of such a call signature computation function is described in the above-incorporated parent U.S. Patent Application and is also described below for convenience.
A signature generator unit 49 within PMU 40 computes and stores the working call signature (WSIG) according to the following two hashing operations. On CALL instructions, the fixed amount S determines how many positions to rotate the current value of WSIG left and then the return address is rotated right by two positions and combined in a logical XOR operation with the rotated WSIG:
Upon execution of a return instruction, the value of WSIG un-hashed by again combining WSIG with the return address shifted right by two in a logical-XOR operation, which will reverse a previously applied XOR of the same return address and then fixed amount S is used to rotate the result right by S positions, according to the following un-hash operation:
Working call signature is stored in a field of a call signature register (CSIG) 46. PMU 40 also includes a root instruction register (ROOT) 47 and a trace mode status and control register (TMSCR) 48. ROOT 47 is programmed by program tracing software to trigger capture of WSIG when the instruction address stored in ROOT 47 is reached, in order to obtain a reference call signature RSIG, which is stored in another field of CSIG 46.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
As noted above, portions of the present invention may be embodied in a computer program product, which may include firmware, an image in system memory or another memory/cache, or stored on a fixed or re-writable media such as an optical disc having computer-readable code stored thereon. Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may store a program in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
In the context of the present application, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form, and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This U.S. Patent Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/300,863 filed on Nov. 21, 2011 and published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 20130055033 on Feb. 28, 2013, which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/214,352 filed on Aug. 22, 2011, and published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 20130054942 on Feb. 28, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5381533 | Peleg et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5875324 | Tran et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5970439 | Levine et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6170083 | Adl-Tabatabai | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253338 | Smolders | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6351844 | Bala | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6513133 | Campbell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539500 | Kahle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6647491 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6920549 | Ukai | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7000095 | Jeppesen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7076640 | Kadambi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103877 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7243350 | Lindwer | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7315795 | Homma | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7490229 | Tremblay et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496908 | DeWitt, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7603545 | Sunayama et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7657893 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694281 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7765387 | Sunayama et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7949854 | Thaik et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8042007 | Chan et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8261244 | Pietrek | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281304 | Kimura | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8407518 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8612730 | Hall et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020066081 | Duesterwald et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20050081107 | DeWitt et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050132363 | Tewari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050210454 | DeWitt et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223364 | Peri et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060005180 | Nefian et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060080531 | Sinha et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060168432 | Caprioli et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060253837 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070294592 | Ashfield et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080086597 | Davis et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080171598 | Deng | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080222632 | Ueno et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090037709 | Ishii | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090254919 | Jayaraman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100017791 | Finkler | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100100774 | Ding et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100306764 | Khanna | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110107071 | Jacob (Yaakov) | May 2011 | A1 |
20120005462 | Hall | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005463 | Mestan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120254670 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254837 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,189, filed Apr. 4, 2011, Frazier, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,964, filed Jun. 20, 2011, Abrams, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/828,697, filed Jul. 1, 2010, Hall, et al. |
Shi, et al., “Analyzing the Effects of Trace Cache Configurations on the Prediction of Indirect Branches”, Journal of Instruction-Level Parallelism, Feb. 2006, pp. 1-24, Raleigh, NC. |
Zagha, et al.,“Performance Analysis Using the MIPS R10000 Performance Counters”, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Nov. 1996, 20 pages (pp. 1-20 in pdf), Pittsburgh, PA. |
Nataraj, et al., “Ghost in the Machine: Observing the effects of Kernel Operation on Parallel Application Performance”, International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Nov. 2007, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf), Reno, NV. |
Anonymous, “Fast Identification of Previously-retrieved Callstacks”, ip.com document IPCOM000200962D, Nov. 2010, 3 pages (pp. 1-3 in pdf). |
Intel 64 and IA-32 Software Developer's Manual, vol. 3A: System Programming, Mar. 2010, 812 pages (pp. 1-812 in pdf), US. |
Intel Itanium2 Processor Reference Manual for Software Development and Optimization, May 2004, 196 pages (pp. 1-196 in pdf), US. |
“Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Optimization Reference Manual”, Jun. 2011, 774 pages (pp. 1-774), US. |
Bala, et al., “Dynamo: A Transparent Dynamic Optimization System”, In Proceedings of Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLOD), 2000, pp. 1-12, US. |
Bond, et al., “Probabilistic Calling Context”, In Proceedings of Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications (OOPSLA) 2007, 15 pages (pp. 1-15 in pdf), US. |
Odaira, et al., “Efficient Runtime Tracking of Allocation Sites in Java”, In Proceedings of Virtual Execution Environments (VEE), 2010, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf), US. |
Lu, et al., “Design and Implementation of a Lightweight Dynamic Optimization System”, Journal of Instruction Level Parallelism, Apr. 2004, pp. 1-24, US. |
Merten, et al., “A Hardware-Driven Profiling Scheme for Identifying Program Hot Spots to Support Runtime Optimization”, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) pp. 136-147, May 1999, Atlanta, US. |
Rotenberg, et al., “Trace cache: a low latency approach to high bandwidth instruction fetching”, Proceedings of the 29th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, Dec. 2-4, 1996, pp. 24-34, xii+359, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Paris, FR. |
Jacobson, et al., “Trace Preconstruction”, Proceedings of 27th International Symposium in Computer Architecture, Jun. 14, 2000, pp. 37-46, ACM vi+328, Vancouver, BC, CA. |
Patel, et al., “Improving trace cache effectiveness with branch promotion and trace packing”, Proceedings of the 1998 25th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Jun. 27-Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 262-271, IEEE Computer Soc. Press, Barcelona, ES. |
Yeh, et al., “Increasing the instruction fetch rate via multiple branch prediction and a branch address cache”, ICS 1993 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Supercomputing, Jul. 1993, pp. 67-76, Tokyo, JP. |
Liu, “Predict Instruction Flow Based on Sequential Segments”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Apr. 1991, pp. 66-69, vol. 33, No. 11. |
Mars, et al., “MATS: Multicore Adaptive Trace Selection”, IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (CGO), 3rd Workshop on Software Tools for MultiCore Systems, Apr. 6, 2008, 6 pages (pp. 1-6 in pdf), Boston, MA. |
Merten, et al., “A Hardware Mechanism for Dynamic Extraction and Relayout of Program Hot Spots”, Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, May 2000, pp. 59-70, vol. 28, Issue 2, Vancouver, BC, Canada. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/828,697 mailed on Feb. 7, 2013, 27 pages (pp. 1-27 in pdf). |
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/828,697 mailed on Jun. 12, 2013, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/300,863 mailed on Dec. 4, 2014, 38 pages (pp. 1-38 in pdf). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140059523 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13300863 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14069769 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13214352 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13300863 | US |