The present disclosure relates generally to communication systems and, more particularly, to computing hash values for data units at a computing device.
Today, hashing functions are widely used in a variety of computing applications to map data in a larger set to a value in a smaller set. For example, a relatively long sequence of bits may be supplied as an input into a mathematical function to generate a shorter sequence of bits that serves as an index into a database table. In general, mathematicians and engineers prefer hashing methodologies that have low computational complexity, are deterministic, yield hash values uniformly distributed across the smaller set, and have other properties useful in computing.
One area of application in which hashing can be particularly useful is load balancing in network switching. In general, a network switch may receive and transmit data packets via multiple ingress and egress links. In many situations, it is permissible to direct a received data packet via more than one egress link to properly route the data packet to its destination. Moreover, network switches sometimes are purposefully aggregated into load-balancing networks to provide more bandwidth between communicating devices or networks. Grouping links together to define wider communication channels is known as link aggregation (LAG). In those situations where multiple links present equally attractive routing choices to a network switch, the routing technique is typically referred to as equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing. If, on the other hand, some of the links present non-equal routing choices to the network switch, the routing technique may be referred to as weighed-cost multi-path (WCMP).
To properly balance the distribution of data packets among the multiple equally appropriate links in LAG applications, the network switch may “hash” the data packets into the corresponding links. However, known hashing techniques often produce polarization, or “favoring” of a particular link in a group of suitable links for certain types of packets. Further, when multiple network switches operate as respective hops in a load-balancing network, the same load balancing decision may be made at each hop, thus further polarizing a particular path through the load-balancing network.
In an embodiment, a method for load balancing in a communication network having a plurality link aggregate groups includes receiving a data unit at a first one of the plurality of network devices associated with a first one of the plurality of link aggregate groups, applying a hashing function to the data unit to generate a first hash value, wherein the first hash value identifies a communication link in the first one of the plurality of link aggregate groups, receiving the data unit at a second one of the plurality of network devices associated with a second one of the plurality of link aggregate groups; and applying the hashing function to the data unit to generate a second hash value that is distinct from the first value, such that the second hash value identifies a communication link in the second one of the plurality of link aggregate groups along which the data unit is to be communicated.
In another embodiment, a network device operating in a load balancing network includes a first network interface to receive a data unit, a hash value generator to generate a hash value based on the data unit, a link selector to select a communication link in a link aggregate group based on the hash value, and a second interface coupled to the link aggregate group to transmit the data unit along the communication link. The hash value generator includes a hash input selector to select a first set of inputs to be included in hash input data according to a fixed scheme, and to select a second set of inputs according to a user-configurable scheme, where the hash input data includes at least a portion of the data unit, and a hashing function to generate the hash value based on the hash input data.
In another embodiment, a method in a load balancing network device for avoiding polarization including receiving a data unit, generating a hash input data based at least in part on a data unit using a fixed scheme and a user-configurable scheme, applying a hashing function to the hash input data to generate a hash value, selecting a communication link in a link aggregate group based on the hash value, and transmitting the data unit along the communication link.
In another embodiment, a load balancing communication network includes a plurality of link aggregate groups, a first network device that includes a first hash value generator that implements a hashing function to generate a first hash value based on a data unit, such that the first hash value identifies a communication link in a first one of the plurality of link aggregate groups along which the data unit is to communicated, and a second network device that includes a second hash value generator that implements the hashing function to generate a second hash value based on a data unit, such that the first hash value identifies a communication link in a second one of the plurality of link aggregate groups along which the data unit is to communicated
In an embodiment, a method in a network device for generating a hash value corresponding to a data unit includes generating hash input data, selecting a mask indicative of which portions of the hash input data are to be used in hash computation, applying the mask to the hash input data, and applying a hashing function to the hash input data to generate the hash value. Generating the hash input data includes retrieving user-defined data from a user-modifiable memory and using the user-defined data to select a first set of portions of the data unit to be included in the hash input data.
In various implementations, one or more of the following features may be included. Generating the input data includes retrieving fixed data from a memory that is not user modifiable, and using the fixed data to select a second set of portions of the data unit to be included in the hash input data. Using the fixed data to select a second set of portions of the data unit includes applying a fixed offset into a header of the data unit. When the data unit is associated with a plurality of communication protocol layers, using the user-defined data to select a first set of portions of the data unit includes using a first field of the user-defined data to determine a header corresponding to a desired communication protocol layer of the data unit, and using a second field of the user-defined data to locate a portion in the header of the desired communication protocol layer of the data unit. Selecting the mask is based on an ingress port of the network device at which the data unit has been received. The data unit is a data packet associated with one of a plurality of packet types, so that selecting the mask is based on the one of the plurality of packet types. Each of the plurality of packet types is associated with a respective data-carrying mechanism. Applying the hashing function includes using a seed specific to the network device. Selecting the hashing function according to a user input.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for generating a hash value corresponding to a data unit includes a user-modifiable memory; a hash input selector to generate hash input data including at least portions of the data unit, such that the hash input selector includes a first selector to select a first plurality of portions of the data unit according to user-defined data stored in the user-modifiable memory; a hash mask selector to obtain a hash mask; a hash input generator to apply the hash mask to the hash input data; and a hash generator to generate the hash value based on the hash input data.
In various implementations, one or more of the following features may be included. The apparatus further includes a memory that is not user-modifiable, and the hash input selector further includes a second selector to select a second plurality of portions of the data unit according to fixed data stored in the memory that is not user-modifiable. The hash input selector further includes a third selector to select an identifier of the ingress port at which the data unit was received for inclusion in the hash input data. The apparatus is included in a network device communicating with at least one other network device via a communication link and including a register to store a seed specific to the network device, and the hash generator including an input to receive the seed. A first stage to generate an intermediate hash value having a first length based on the hash input data; and a second stage to generate the hash value having a second length based on the intermediate hash value; where the first length is different than the second length. A first hashing function associated with a first hashing mode to generate a first hash value based on the hash input data, a second hashing function associated with a second hashing mode to generate a second hash value based on the hash input data, an input to receive a hash mode selection signal, and a selector to select between the first hashing function and the second hashing function based on the hash mode selection signal. A first mask source to obtain a first potential hash mask from a respective register based on an ingress port at which the data unit has been received, a second mask source to obtain a second potential hash mask from a memory based on a rule associated with the data unit, a third mask source to generate a third potential hash mask based on a packet type with which the data unit is associated, and a mask source selector to select between the first mask source, the second mask source, and the third mask source.
In yet another embodiment, a load balancing network comprises: a first network device coupled to a second network device. The first network device includes: a first network interface configured to receive a data unit; a second network interface configured to transmit the data unit, wherein the second network interface is coupled to a first plurality of communication links corresponding to a first link aggregate group; a first hash value generator configured to apply a hash function to the data unit to generate a first hash value; and a first link selector to select, based on the first hash value, a first communication link in the first link aggregate group along which the data unit is to be communicated. The second network device includes: a third network interface coupled to the first communication link and configured to receive the data unit; a fourth network interface configured to transmit the data unit, wherein the second network interface is coupled to a second plurality of communication links corresponding to a second link aggregate group; a second hash value generator configured to apply the hash function to the data unit to generate a second hash value distinct from the first hash value; and a second link selector to select, based on the second hash value, a second communication link in the second link aggregate group along which the data unit is to be communicated.
In operation, the network device ND1 receives data units (such as packets or frames) traveling from the external network 12 to the internal communication network 14 via communication links 18, 20, and 22 at respective ports P1, P2, and P3, and forwards the received data units to the network devices ND2 or ND3 via the corresponding ports P4, P5, and P6 and, ultimately, respective communication links 24, 26, and 28. The network device ND1 thus has a receive interface to which the communication links 18, 20, and 22 are coupled, and a transmit interface coupled to the communication links 24, 26, and 28. The routing configuration of the load-balancing network 10 may be such that the network device ND1 may select more than one of the ports of P4, P5, or P6 to properly direct a data packet toward its destination in the internal network 14. However, because each of the communication links 24-28 has limited bandwidth, the network device ND1 applies load-balancing techniques to distribute the received packets among the appropriate ones of the links 24-28. To this end, the network device ND1 utilizes the hash value generator 16 to generate an efficient hash value using some or all of fixed portions of data packets, user-configured portions of data packets, parameters specific to the network device ND1, etc. Moreover, the hash value generator may support selective, user-configurable masking of portions of data packets and parameters to allow operators to efficiently configure the load-balancing network 10. At least some embodiments of the hash value generator 16 advantageously avoid link polarization and improve the overall distribution of data packets among communication links.
More specifically, the hash generator 16 generates a hash value using a fixed scheme and a user-configurable scheme to select portions of a data unit (e.g., a data packets, a frame, etc.), as well as network-device-specific fields or other data not included in the data unit. The hash value is then applied to a link selector such as a modulo divider to select a communication link in a link aggregate group along which the data packet is to travel. Even though the network devices ND1-ND6 may have the same hash generator 16 applying the same one or several hashing functions, the devices ND1-ND6 generate different hash values in response to the same data unit, thus avoiding polarization at the corresponding link aggregate groups. Further, the network devices ND1-ND6 may provide further flexibility in link selection by applying hashing masks which may be selected based on the ingress port at which the data packet arrives, the type of the data packet, or a rule in a memory, for example. Still further, the network devices ND1-ND6 may apply different seeds to the respective hashing functions.
It will be noted that although
The links 18-22 may correspond to different physical communication channels such as network cables, wireless bands, etc., or logical channels such as timeslots of a digital signal 1 (DS1) line, to take one example. Similarly, ports P1-P3 may correspond to physical or logical resources of the network device ND1. As illustrated in
In general, the data flows 30-34 may be associated with different communication protocols such as Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) layered over Internet Protocol (IP) (hereinafter, “TCP/IP”), User Datagram Protocol (UDP) layered over IP (hereinafter, “UDP/IP”), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), etc. For example, the data flow 30 may correspond to FTP, the data flow 32 may correspond to Telnet, and the data flow 34 may correspond to HTTP. Further, some of the data flows 30-34 may correspond to different sessions associated with the same communication protocol. A typical network link may also include Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), Structured Query Language (SQL), and several additional data flows associated with mailing, browsing, database, remote login, and other application types. Although the illustrative data flows 30-34 are associated with protocols layered over IP, an operator may configure the network devices ND1-ND6 to process and route data flows on other layers of various protocol stacks.
Each of the data flows 30-34 may include multiple streams, sessions, or connections. It is noted that some protocols, such as TCP, are connection-oriented while others, such as UDP, are connectionless. For example, an outside host on the network 12 may connect to a local host on the network 14 by establishing a TCP connection having a particular address and port combination on both ends. This connection is identifiable by the TCP header specifying, in part, the address of the outside host, the address of the local host, the port on the outside host, and the port on the local host. An individual TCP/IP packet may carry a certain quantum or chunk of information associated with the same connection, or communication session. On the other hand, a pair of hosts may use the UDP protocol to exchange individual messages, or datagrams, without establishing a connection. Thus, each of the data flows 30-34 may include one or more streams such as TCP including multiple packets associated with a single data exchange or single packets conveying individual messages in their entirety. In the examples discussed below, a data stream generally refers to a unidirectional or bidirectional data exchange between two or more hosts including one or more data units such as data packets or frames.
With continued reference to
In general, data packets traveling through the load-balancing network 10 may be of any desired length consistent with the corresponding protocol (e.g., TCP/IP in the case of the data packet 40). Further, the length of the data packet 40 may be operator-configurable to accommodate the particular requirements of the network devices ND1-ND6. In some embodiments, the network devices ND1-ND6 may operate on protocols or protocol layers which do not define packets of a particular length. In this sense, an individual packet may be any logical designation of a grouping or quantum of data. In some embodiments, the term “packet” may refer simply to a grouping of data on a particular stream for the purpose of generating a hash value by one of the network devices ND1-ND6. On the other hand, in other embodiments, this term may refer to a grouping of data included in two or more frames of a communication protocol. For example, a single data packet may include multiple TCP frames.
Next,
Referring to
As illustrated in
To generate a hash output of the same length irrespective of which of the two CRC algorithms has been selected via a hash mode selection signal 116, in accordance with an embodiment, the hash value generator 16 may include a Pearson hash matrix 120 to map the 16-bit output of the CRC generator 110 to a 6-bit value. The Pearson hash matrix 120 in this example has 64 rows, each storing a 6-bit value. The notation TABLE[n] accordingly refers to the 6-bit value stored in the row n of the Pearson has matrix 120. As one example, the Pearson hash matrix 120 may generate a first parameter A using bits 5 through 0 of CRCLONG as an index into a look-up table:
A=TABLE[CRCLONG[5:0]], (1)
and the second parameter B according to
B=TABLE[A XOR CRCLONG[11:6]], (2)
so that
CRCSHORT′=TABLE[B XOR {00,CRC[15:12]}]. (3)
A selector 122 selects one of CRCSHORT and CRCSHORT′ based on a hash mode selection signal 116, and outputs the selected bits as the hash value via a line 124. In some embodiments, the hash mode selection signal 116 may correspond to a value in one of the user-configurable registers of the network device ND1-ND6 in which the hash value generator 16 resides. If desired, the hash input generator 100 may also include a selector component to selectively activate only one of the CRC generators 110 and 112 in response to the hash mode selection signal 116.
Of course, hash generators or hashing functions of any other type may be used instead of the CRC generators 110 and 112, or the Pearson hash matrix 120. Further, the length of the outputs of the CRC generators 110 and 112 also may be selected according to the desired implementation, and it will be noted that the specific polynomials, bit positions, etc. were discussed above by way of example only. Further, other polynomials of the same degree as the respective one of the CRC generator 110 and 112 may be used.
As schematically illustrated in
Index=Hash Value mod l. (4)
Next,
A fixed field table 180 includes NFX entries, each specifying a field of the data packet 40 to be unconditionally applied to the input bytes 105 (although any field may be later masked out using the hash mask 107). Table 1 below lists fixed fields of an example data packet, along with the respective offsets (in bits) within the input bytes 105, in one embodiment of the fixed field table 180:
In one embodiment, the packet field table 180 may be stored in a read-only memory, a FLASH memory, etc., or otherwise hard-coded into the hash input selector 102. In this embodiment, the packet field table 180 is not user-configurable and is stored in a memory that is not user-modifiable. In other embodiments, the packet field table 180 may be stored in a memory that is not a read-only memory or FLASH memory, and/or is user-configurable and/or is stored in a memory that is user-modifiable.
Referring to
With continued reference to
Further, the hash input generator 102 may support NUD user-defined bytes (UDBs) to allow network engineers and technicians to specify which additional fields of the data packet 40, if any, should be used to generate the hash input bytes 105. In the example embodiment illustrated in
Specifically with respect to the anchor sub-field 202, a pre-defined enumeration scheme may be used to allow operators to select between L2 header, L3 header, L4 header, L4 payload, as well as the beginning of multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) sub-layers L1, L2, etc. In some embodiments, operators may configure the anchor sub-field 202 in some of the entries of the table 200 to point to non-standard, application- or network-specific protocols encapsulated within the application layer of the data packet 40.
In another aspect, the UDB table 200 may list NUD entries for each of the K packet types which may include, for example, TCP/IP, UDP/IP, etc. as well as M user-defined packet types. Columns of the UDB table 200 may be indexed by a signal specifying the packet type (not shown). The number of entries in the UDB table 200 in this embodiment is accordingly NUD×K. In one embodiment, the UDB table 200 is stored in a writable memory location to permit editing by user or software running on the network device ND1, whereas the packet field table 180 is stored in a read-only memory. More generally, in one embodiment, the UDB table 200 may be user-configurable and may be stored in a user-modifiable memory, whereas the packet field table 180 is not user configurable and is stored in a memory that is not user-modifiable.
It is noted that the NB bytes of the hash input bytes 105 may include fixed packet fields, device-specific fields, and user-defined fields so that
NB=NFX+NDS+NUD. (5)
These NB bytes provide significant flexibility to operators in configuring hash computation and enable additional variation between hash values computed for the same data packet at different ones of the network devices ND1-ND6 by using device-specific parameters as a part of the hash input. In a sense, each of the tables or lists 180, 190, and 200 defines an independent selector of the input data, with the table 200 defining a fully configurable selector and the list 190 defining a partially configurable selector, in one embodiment.
Now referring to
The hash mask selector 104 selects an appropriate entry of the port mask table 250 based on a packet port signal 270 which specifies the ingress port of the network device ND1 at which the data packet 40 has been received. More specifically, the packet port signal 270 controls the selection, at multiplexers 280 and 282, between port-specific rows 1, 2, . . . NP, each of which stores a respective enable flag 272/1, 272/2, . . . 272/NP and a respective index 274/1, 274/2, . . . 274/NP. Each of the rows 1, 2, . . . NP may be a register storing port-specific parameters such as configuration options, for example. After an appropriate entry in the table 250 or 252 has been selected, the output of the multiplexer 262 is used as an index into an interface-based mask table 290. Each of the 4 rows of the interface-based mask table 290 may store an NB-bit long hash input mask. In one contemplated embodiment, LIF is equal to 16 to accommodate a sufficiently high number of interface-specific mask selections. In other embodiments, LIF may be a suitable number other than 16. Of course, the mask table 250 generally may be stored in any kind of computer-readable memory. Further, as an alternative to TCAM, the mask table 252 may be disposed in CAM or in any other type of memory.
With continued reference to
Generally with respect to
Once the NB bytes have been selected, a hash mask is selected in block 406 to choose which of the NB bytes obtained in block 404 are actually used in hash computation. One example apparatus that may perform mask selection is discussed above with reference to
At block 408, the mask obtained at block 406 is applied to the NB hash input bytes selected at block 404. As illustrated in
Upon selecting the hashing mode at block 410, the method 400 may proceed to generate a hash value at block 412 by applying the appropriate hashing function to the hash input generated at block 408 or, as implemented in the example embodiment of
Referring now to
In some embodiments, device-specific bytes are applied to the corresponding positions of the hash input bytes 105 (block 434). Generally speaking, the data applied to these positions may reflect a configuration parameter of the network device ND1-ND7 (such a device type, for example), a port at which the data packet has been received, or another parameter not directly related to the contents of the data packet. Finally, at block 436, user-defined bytes are applied (e.g., copied) to the hash input bytes 105 from the data packet. To continue with the example of TCP/IP data packet 40, one of user-defined bytes may refer to the Window Size parameter in the TCP header. To this end, the user-defined byte may identify the layer L4 using the anchor sub-field 202 (see
Referring now to
At block 460, one of the hash index obtained from a TCAM action or the hash index from a port register is used to access an interface-based mask table and retrieve a hash input mask. After block 460, the method 406 may end (block 464). If it is determined at block 456 that per-port configuration is not enabled, the hash input mask may be obtained based on the type of the data packet 40 at block 462. One example of an apparatus that implements the steps 452-458 is illustrated in
At least some of the various blocks, operations, and techniques described above may be implemented utilizing hardware, a processor executing firmware instructions, a processor executing software instructions, or any combination thereof. When implemented utilizing a processor executing software or firmware instructions, the software or firmware instructions may be stored in any computer readable memory such as on a magnetic disk, an optical disk, or other storage medium, in a RAM or ROM or flash memory, processor, hard disk drive, optical disk drive, tape drive, etc. Likewise, the software or firmware instructions may be delivered to a user or a system via any known or desired delivery method including, for example, on a computer readable disk or other transportable computer storage mechanism or via communication media. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency, infrared and other wireless media. Thus, the software or firmware instructions may be delivered to a user or a system via a communication channel such as a telephone line, a DSL line, a cable television line, a fiber optics line, a wireless communication channel, the Internet, etc. (which are viewed as being the same as or interchangeable with providing such software via a transportable storage medium). The software or firmware instructions may include machine readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform various acts.
When implemented in hardware, the hardware may comprise one or more of discrete components, an integrated circuit, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), etc.
Although the forgoing text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments, it should be understood that the scope of the patent is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this patent. The detailed description is to be construed merely as providing illustrative examples and does not describe every possible embodiment because describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this disclosure, which would still fall within the scope of the claims.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/537,078, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,237,100, entitled “Hash Computation for Network Switches”, filed on Aug. 6, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/086,641, entitled “Hash Computation” filed Aug. 6, 2008. The disclosures of the applications referenced above are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5032987 | Broder et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
6035107 | Kuehlmann et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6249521 | Kerstein | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6363396 | Klots et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6430170 | Saints et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6614758 | Wong et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6735670 | Bronstein et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757742 | Viswanath | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6973082 | Devi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7190696 | Manur et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7224845 | Russo et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7280527 | Basso et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7346706 | Rezaaifar et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7424016 | Sweeney et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7539750 | Parker et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7554914 | Li et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7567567 | Muller et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580417 | Ervin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7613209 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7623455 | Hilla et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7639614 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7796594 | Melman et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821925 | Davies | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821931 | Swenson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7898959 | Arad | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7969880 | Yano et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979671 | Aviles | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8004990 | Callon | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8175107 | Yalagandula et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8238250 | Fung | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8243594 | Fotedar et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8244909 | Hanson et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8259585 | S P et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8274971 | Battle et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8339951 | Scaglione | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8355328 | Matthews et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364711 | Wilkins et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8503456 | Matthews et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8587674 | Iwata | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8614950 | Roitshtein et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8625594 | Safrai et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660005 | Roitshtein et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8756424 | Roitshtein et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8792497 | Rajagopalan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8848728 | Revah et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
9171030 | Arad et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9237100 | Mizrahi et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9269439 | Levy et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
20020093952 | Gonda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133594 | Syvanne | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030043825 | Magnussen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030147385 | Montalvo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030210688 | Basso et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030235168 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040073640 | Martin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050198297 | Tzeng | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213582 | Wakumoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060251109 | Muller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070098006 | Parry | May 2007 | A1 |
20070280258 | Rajagopalan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080031263 | Ervin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037544 | Yano | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049774 | Swenson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052488 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069114 | Shimada | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084881 | Dharwadkar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080181103 | Davies | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205655 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090196303 | Battle et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090274154 | Kopelman et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100023726 | Aviles | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100142410 | Huynh Van et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100214913 | Kompella | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100215042 | Sato | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100284404 | Gopinath et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110013627 | Matthews et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013638 | Matthews et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013639 | Matthews et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110102612 | Iwata | May 2011 | A1 |
20110134925 | Safrai et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110295894 | Yoo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296411 | Tang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120136846 | Song et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130013880 | Tashiro et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140093073 | Horgan et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115167 | Roitshtein et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140160934 | Roitshtein et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173129 | Basso et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140301394 | Arad et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325228 | Roitshtein et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150334057 | Gao et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2013017017 | Feb 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
IEEE Std 802.1Q, 2003 Edition, “IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan area networks—Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks,” The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 327 pages (May 7, 2003). |
IEEE Std 802.1Q—2011 (Revision of IEEE Std.802.1Q—2005), “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges and Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks,” The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 1,365 pages (Aug. 31, 2011). |
IEEE P802.1aq/D4.6, Draft Amendment to IEEE Std 802.1Q—2011, “IEEE Draft Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges and Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks—Amendment XX: Shortest Path Bridging,” The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 363 pages (Feb. 10, 2012). |
IEEE P802.1ad/D6.0, Draft Amendment to IEEE Std 802.1Q, “IEEE Draft Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks—Amendment 4: Provider Bridges,” The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 60 pages, (Aug. 17, 2005). |
Demetriades et al., “An Efficient Hardware-based Multi-hash Scheme for High Speed IP Lookup,” 2008 16th IEEE Symposium on High Performance Interconnects, Aug. 2008. |
Herlihy et al., “Hopscotch Hashing,” DISC '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Distributed Computing, pp. 350-364 (Sep. 22, 2008). |
“Hopscotch Hashing,” Wikipedia entry downloaded from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopscotch_hashing on Oct. 6, 2014 (3 pages). |
Peng et al., “Content-Addressable memory (CAM) and its network applications,” International IC—Taipei Conference Proceedings, May 2000. |
Raoof, Impact of Depolarization Effects on MIMO Polarized Wireless Configuration, Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007, pp. 1-4 (Sep. 2007). |
Shavit, “Hopscotch Hashing,” PowerPoint Presentation downloaded from http://www.velox-project.eu/sites/default/files/Hopscotchc%20Hashing%20talk%20slides.ppt on Oct. 6, 2014 (50 slides). |
Thaler et al., “Multipath Issues in Unicast and Multicast Next-Hop Selection,” The Internet Society, pp. 1-10 (2000). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/115,670, “Methods and Apparatus for Handling Multicast Packets in an Audio Video Bridging (AVB) Network,” filed May 25, 2011 (Pannell, et al.). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/695,520, “Efficient TCAM Architecture,” filed Aug. 31, 2012 (Levy et al.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61086641 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12537078 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 14992838 | US |