1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a haymaking machine, in particular a windrower for plants lying on the ground.
Windrowers are suited to the harvesting of cut fodder lying on the ground, these machines provided with a rotor and movable tools make it possible to gather the fodder in windrows intended to be subsequently picked up for example by means of presses.
2. Description of the Related Art
Windrowers comprise a support structure including a main beam on which is articulated at least one lateral arm which is movable around an axis by a jack and which carries at least one windrowing rotor. Windrowers usually comprise several rotors staggered along the support structure so as to cover a large work area during the movement of the agricultural machine on a field or a meadow.
Agricultural machines operate on all types of terrain, therefore the tools and equipment which are used by farmers must adapt themselves depending on the relief of these terrains.
The windrower is brought to work in fields which may be sloping or on irregular terrains, or else comprising obstacles. To permit this work, the rotor of the windrower usually has a certain latitude of movement so as to follow the contours of the terrain, devices are provided, in addition, to raise the tools.
The latitude of movement of the rotor in operation is currently not adjustable and the displacements of the work tool are not controlled in a precise manner. Consequently, the articulation between the support arm of the rotor and the rotor is subjected to great stresses, there is thus a need to control the displacement of the rotor during work and during movements.
When the work in the field requires to raise the rotor, to pass an obstacle for example, or when the rotor is folded to the vertical for transport outside the work area, it is preferable if there is no unexpected movement which could cause damage for the articulation and the rotor itself if the rotor came to run into the frame. A problem thus appears which is to block the displacement of the rotor when the latter is not in work position.
The invention therefore has the aim of solving these main difficulties by proposing a blocking device of the possible displacements of the rotor when the latter is situated outside the work configuration.
Thus, the invention relates to a haymaking machine, more particularly a windrower, comprising a support structure including a main beam on which is articulated at least one lateral arm supporting at least one windrowing rotor, which rotor is connected to a support device forming an interface with a support mounted on the lateral arm, which support device allows the rotor to displace so as to follow the movements of the terrain when the machine is in operation and is in work position, the machine being characterized in that the support device comprises an adjustment system making it possible to limit the movements of the rotor in the work position and to block them in other positions, and in that the adjustment system allowing to limit the movements of the rotor comprises on one hand a control means including at least one hydraulic jack and on another hand a connecting device movable by the at least one hydraulic jack.
The advantages of the device according to the invention are multiple:
the displacements of the rotor at work are controlled, and damped to a certain extent, by the hydraulic jack or jacks, which has the effect of reducing the mechanical stresses on the articulation between the support arm of the rotor and the rotor,
apart from the work position, the hydraulic jack or jacks can block any unexpected movement of the rotor, which brings a great safety for the transport of the machine,
the synchronisation of the hydraulic jack or jacks with a folding jack of the support arm of the rotor makes it possible to avoid accidents, in particular that the rotor strikes the main beam, the synchronisation also allows, with a single command on the control cabin, to actuate two separate elements, which is favourable in particular for passing obstacles on a field and prevents possible errors by the driver in the scheduling of the commands of the different jacks,
the jacks are synchronised and the different elements are positioned such that an intermediate position is able to be realized in which the rotor is substantially parallel above the ground, raised for example for passing an obstacle, whilst being immobilised with regard to displacement to prevent unexpected movements.
Other features and advantages of the invention will emerge from the following description with regard to the attached drawings, which are given only by way of non-restrictive examples.
As is represented in
The folding jack (4) has the action of unfolding and folding the lateral support arm (2) of the windrowing rotor (5) between a transport position in which the lateral arm (2) is substantially vertical, and a work position in which it is inclined towards the ground. The lateral arm (2) can, in addition, be moved towards an elevated position in which the rotor (5) is raised from the ground. This elevated position is situated between the work position and the transport position and it makes it possible, for example, to passing over a windrow.
As is illustrated in
The tools (8), which are usually forks, gather together the cut fodder lying on the ground in windrows which can then be picked up by another machine. In a known manner, several rotors are arranged on either side of the main beam (1) to cover a large area of the field and to limit the number of windrows to be collected in the following step.
According to the invention, the displacements of the rotor (5) can be carried out in the work position around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11) which are substantially perpendicular, the first axis (10) being situated in a plane parallel to the ground and oriented in the direction of advance (A) of the machine, the second axis (11) being perpendicular to the direction of advance and being able to be more or less inclined with respect to the horizontal when the machine is in work position.
As is represented in the different figures, the rotor (5) is connected to the support (9) by a support device (12) comprising the first axis (10) and the second axis (11), so as to make the displacements allowing the movements of the terrain to be followed when the machine is in operation and is in work position possible. According to the invention, the machine is characterized in particular in that the support device (12) comprises an adjustment system allowing to limit the movements of the rotor (5) around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11) in the work position and to block them in other positions or any other position.
According to the invention, the adjustment system allowing to limit the movements of the rotor (5) comprises on one hand a control means including at least one hydraulic jack (13, 13a, 13b) and on another hand a connecting device movable by the at least one hydraulic jack (13, 13a, 13b).
According to an important feature of the invention, the at least one hydraulic jack (13, 13a, 13b) is connected on one hand to the rotor (5) by means of the connecting device, and on another hand to the support (9).
In the first variant embodiment, and as is principally detailed in
The rocker (14) additionally comprises an axis (16) which is engaged in a housing (17) of oblong shape provided in a lug (18) articulated on the rotor (5) and which makes it possible to limit the pivoting movements around the first axis (10).
In this variant embodiment, the adjustment system comprises a stop means (19a) between the rotor (5) and the support (9) to limit the pivoting movements around the second axis (11), which stop means (19a) comprises two stops (19).
When the hydraulic jack (13) is in unfolded position, as is illustrated in
Likewise in this position, the rotor (5) can also have at its disposal a latitude of movement around the second axis (11), which consequently allows a possible displacement in the three spatial dimensions.
The hydraulic jack (13) is, for example, a single-acting jack controlled under pressure when it is to shorten. When the hydraulic jack (13) is brought into folded position, in contraction, as is illustrated in
The rising of the rotor (5) in the direction of the support (9) also has the effect of bringing the stops (19), provided on the support device (12), in contact with the upper part of the rotor (5), locking in this action the possible rotation around the second axis (11).
The action of the hydraulic jack (13) in contraction thus has the effect of causing the rotor (5) to pivot in the direction of the main beam (1) and of simultaneously blocking the two possible displacements of the rotor (5) around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11).
In the second and third variant embodiments illustrated by
The hydraulic jack (13) is, for example, a single-acting jack controlled under pressure when it is to shorten. During work, the hydraulic jack (13) is floating, i.e. it is not controlled under pressure and it can therefore freely lengthen and shorten itself as a function of the movements of the rotor around the second axis (11). The hydraulic jack (13) can be designed such that during work, the pivoting of the rotor around the second axis (11) does not bring the hydraulic jack (13) into its maximum lengthening position nor into its maximum shortening position. Alternatively, the hydraulic jack (13) can be designed such that during work it can come into its end-of-course positions so as to limit the pivoting movements of the rotor (5) around the second axis (11). During work, the rotor (5) has, furthermore, at its disposal a latitude of movement around the first axis (10), which consequently allows a possible displacement in the three spatial dimensions.
When the hydraulic jack (13) is brought into its shortened position, in contraction, it has the effect of causing the rotor (5) to pivot around the second axis (11) and no further displacement is possible around the second axis (11). In the second variant embodiment, as can be deduced from
In the fourth variant embodiment illustrated by
This fourth variant embodiment preferably makes provision that the first hydraulic jack (13a) is arranged in a plane passing through the first axis (10) and that the second hydraulic jack (13b) is arranged in a plane passing through the second axis (11).
The first and second hydraulic jacks (13a, 13b) are, for example, single-acting jacks controlled under pressure when they are to shorten. During work, the first and second hydraulic jacks (13a, 13b) are floating, i.e. they are not controlled under pressure and they can therefore freely lengthen and shorten as a function of the movements of the rotor around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11).
The first hydraulic jack (13a) can be designed such that, during work, the pivoting of the rotor around the second axis (11) does not bring the first hydraulic jack (13a) into a position of maximum lengthening nor into a position of maximum shortening. Alternatively, the first hydraulic jack (13a) can be designed such that, during work, it can come into its end-of-course positions so as to limit the pivoting movements of the rotor (5) around the second axis (11). The second hydraulic jack (13b) can be designed such that, during work, the pivoting of the rotor around the first axis (10) does not bring the second hydraulic jack (13b) into a position of maximum lengthening nor into a position of maximum shortening. Alternatively, the second hydraulic jack (13b) can be designed such that, during work, it can come into its end-of-course positions so as to limit the pivoting movements of the rotor (5) around the first axis (10). During work, the rotor (5) therefore has at its disposal a certain latitude of movement around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11), which consequently allows a possible displacement in the three spatial dimensions.
When the first hydraulic jack (13a) is brought into shortened position, in contraction, it has the effect of causing the rotor (5) to pivot around the second axis (11) and no further displacement is possible around the second axis (11). When the second hydraulic jack (13b) is brought into shortened position, in contraction, it has the effect of causing the rotor (5) to pivot in the direction of the main beam (1) around the first axis (10) and no further displacement is possible around the first axis (10). Thus, the action of the first and second hydraulic jacks (13a, 13b) in contraction blocks simultaneously the two possible displacements of the rotor (5) around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11).
In the fifth variant embodiment illustrated by
In this variant embodiment, the adjustment system comprises two stops (19′) situated between the rotor (5) and the support (9) so as to limit the pivoting movements around the first axis (10). In addition, the adjustment system comprises a stop means (19a) comprising a stop (19) situated between the rotor (5) and the support (9) so as to limit the pivoting movements around the second axis (11). The second axis (11) can move in a limited manner within an oblong hole formed in a lug (24) rigidly fastened to the rotor (5), the ends of the oblong hole forming the two stops (19′). The stop (19) is formed by a bearing face rigidly fastened to the support (9) against which the first axis (10) can come in contact.
The hydraulic jack (13) is, for example, a single-acting jack controlled under pressure when it is to shorten. During work, the hydraulic jack (13) is floating, i.e. it is not controlled under pressure and it can therefore freely lengthen and shorten as a function of the movements of the rotor around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11). During work, the rotor (5) therefore has at its disposal a possible displacement in the three spatial dimensions.
When the hydraulic jack (13) is brought into shortened position, in contraction, it has the effect, owing to its positioning in an oblique plane, of causing the rotor (5) to pivot in the direction of the main beam (1) around both the first axis (10) and the second axis (11). The first axis (10) then comes to rest against the stop (19) whilst the second axis (11) comes to rest against the lower strop (19′), the furthest away from the support arm (2). The result of this is that no further displacement is possible around the first axis (10) and the second axis (11).
The support (9) can slide under the action of the hydraulic jack (22) along the lateral arm (2) so as to position the rotor (5) as favourably as possible according to the number of rotors used and the desired configuration for work.
The passage between the work position, the intermediate position and the transport position is carried out under the action of the folding jack (4). The positioning of this jack (4) with respect to the main beam (1) and with respect to the lateral arm (2) is readily visible in
Thus, according to the invention, the folding jack (4) of the lateral support arm (2) of the rotor (5) is arranged between a connecting element (20) with the main beam (1) and substantially the exterior end (21) of the lateral arm (2), so as to allow the movement of the lateral arm (2) between a position inclined towards the ground, the work position, and a transport position in which the lateral arm (2) is situated more or less vertically with respect to the ground, the movement being carried out in a rotation around the axis (3).
Advantageously, the folding jack (4) and the hydraulic jack or jacks (13, 13a, 13b) of the control means are synchronised so that the movement of the lateral arm (2) towards the vertical position brings about a movement in contraction of the hydraulic jack or jacks (13, 13a, 13b) allowing the blocking of the possible displacements of the rotor (5).
Owing to the synchronisation, the partial folding of the lateral arm (2) to bring the folding jack (4) into a substantially horizontal position with respect to the ground leads to a contraction of the hydraulic jack or jacks (13, 13a, 13b) to bring the rotor (5) in a likewise substantially horizontal position, raised above the ground, so as to allow, for example, to pass over an obstacle.
The synchronisation also makes it possible to be obtain that the movement of the lateral arm (2) towards the work position, by lengthening of the hydraulic jack (4), brings about a movement in lengthening of the hydraulic jack or jacks (13, 13a, 13b) in order to unblock the rotor (5) as soon as it arrives in the work position.
Several variants are possible; the windrower can in particular comprise a variable number of rotors (5) and tools (8) of different types, the dimensions of the rotors (5) can be of greater or less size and they can be placed at a greater or less height with respect to the ground, without departing from the scope of the invention.
As regards the adjustment system making it possible to limit the movement of the rotor (5), the different parts can be shaped in different ways and arranged if necessary according to another configuration in the adjustment system, in particular with regard to the attachment points on the support (9), the shape of the stops (19, 19′) or of the rocker (14), or even the amplitude of the hydraulic jack or jacks (13, 13a, 13b), without departing from the scope of the invention.
The preceding description of the invention relates to a windrowing rotor (5) carried by a lateral support arm (2), it is, however, entirely possible to envisage machines of great width with several rotors (5) carried by a single arm (2), without departing from the scope of the invention.
Of course, the invention is not limited to the embodiments described and represented by way of example, but it also includes all the technical equivalents and the combinations thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11 51307 | Feb 2011 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2012/050324 | 2/15/2012 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/110743 | 8/23/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3484803 | Billhymer et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3546867 | Hauser-Lienhard | Dec 1970 | A |
3834142 | Johnston et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3948028 | Reber | Apr 1976 | A |
4149364 | Aron | Apr 1979 | A |
4275552 | DeCoene | Jun 1981 | A |
4345422 | Amstutz | Aug 1982 | A |
4914901 | Aron | Apr 1990 | A |
4936390 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5024053 | Aron | Jun 1991 | A |
5060465 | Jerome | Oct 1991 | A |
5199252 | Peeters | Apr 1993 | A |
5337546 | Sieling | Aug 1994 | A |
5377482 | Knigge | Jan 1995 | A |
5502959 | Hansen | Apr 1996 | A |
5743075 | Aron et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5806291 | Lehman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5918451 | Vonesch | Jul 1999 | A |
5918452 | Kelderman | Jul 1999 | A |
6220008 | Rowse et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6272826 | Menichetti et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6467249 | Demanet | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6543212 | Tonutti | Apr 2003 | B2 |
8146338 | Cicci et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
20010025473 | Demanet | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20050172603 | Breneur | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070163223 | Hruska et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
503396 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 954 956 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 142 468 | Oct 2001 | EP |
2 253 186 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2 838 284 | Oct 2003 | FR |
2 875 378 | Mar 2006 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report Issued May 25, 2012 in PCT/FR12/050324 Filed Feb. 15, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130312383 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |