The present invention relates to a hazard detector, and more particularly, in one form to a fire-hazard detector that includes protection against incorrect installation, and/or for which in-situ testing is facilitated. In another form, the invention is applicable to a hazard detector the operation of which can be modified when it is in a test mode. The invention is applicable to detectors sensitive to other hazards, e.g. (without limitation) toxic gas, radiation or intruders. The term ‘hazard detector’ thus is to be construed accordingly.
Conventional fire detectors are normally used in simple two-wire circuits powered by a battery or other secure DC supply. When in a stand-by mode, such detectors present a high resistance between the two circuit wires and draw a negligible current from the battery, whereas in an alarm mode they introduce a low resistance across the two circuit wires. The high resistance presented during the stand-by mode normally makes it impossible during that mode to monitor the presence of such a detector on a two-wire circuit. Therefore, to ensure that such fire detectors will operate properly in the alarm mode, it becomes important to determine that they are correctly connected., and regular testing is required.
Some detectors are made insensitive to the polarity of the power supply so as to simplify their installation and avoid problems that occur when a polarity-sensitive device is installed improperly. One way to make a detector insensitive to power-supply polarity is to introduce a diode bridge; this is illustrated in
If a diode bridge or another circuit is not introduced to make the detector insensitive to power-supply polarity, then it becomes necessary to protect the electronic circuit in the detector against a reverse-polarity connection in some other way. This is normally achieved by adding to the detector a diode in parallel with the electronic circuit of the detector and in reverse polarity across the power supply when the detector is properly connected; this is illustrated in
An alternative method of protecting the electronic circuit of a detector against reverse polarity is the inclusion in the detector of a blocking diode in series with the other electronic circuitry of the detector; one embodiment of this is illustrated in
It is an object of at least the preferred embodiments of the invention to provide a detector in which at least some of the foregoing disadvantages are alleviated.
In one aspect the invention provides a hazard detector comprising means for detecting a hazardous condition and for indicating an alarm upon such detection, and means for modifying the behaviour of the detector during a start-up or test mode to facilitate commissioning or testing of the detector. The hazardous condition may be a hazardous smoke level, or may be a hazardous rate of temperature rise. The hazardous rate of temperature rise may be a rate of temperature rise that is equal to, or exceeds, approximately five degrees over a period of thirty seconds.
The modifying means may be a means for filtering out transient detections of the hazardous condition during a normal state of operation and means for disabling the filtering means during the start-up or test mode. The filtering-out of transients can reduce the number of false alarms.
Preferably, the detector is for connection between positive and negative power lines, the detector having a positive terminal and a negative terminal and being adapted, upon application of power to the power lines, to emit a local indicator signal if the positive and negative terminals of the detector have a correct polarity orientation to the positive and negative lines.
In another aspect the invention is a hazard detector for connection between positive and negative power lines, the detector having a positive terminal and a negative terminal and being adapted, immediately following application of power to the power lines, to emit a local indicator signal if the positive and negative terminals of the detector have a correct polarity orientation to the positive and negative lines.
Preferably, the detector includes an electronic circuit serially-connected to a blocking diode, the blocking diode being connected to either the positive or negative terminal. Preferably, the indicator signal is a light signal. More preferably, the indicator signal is a flashing light signal with repetitive on/off cycle, the period of which may be approximately one second.
The flashing light signal may be produced by a light-emitting diode (LED) that forms part of the electronic circuit. Preferably, the LED emits red light.
Preferably, the detector is in a test mode when it is emitting the local indicator signal.
Preferred features of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:—
The subject invention involves a hazard detector of the type which uses a series diode for polarity protection, as previously discussed with respect to
In the first embodiment, when a hazard detector 10 of the subject invention is initially connected to a power supply, current only flows through a detector electronic circuit 12 (see
After correct installation, the flashing ability of the detector may be utilized in a further way, namely, to assist with locating a power-supply wiring fault. If an open-circuit fault occurs at an unknown location on the power-supply wiring, the power supply is temporarily disconnected. After reconnection, only those detectors that are located between a control panel and the fault location will begin to flash. The location of the fault can thereby be detected without requiring any of the detectors to be removed or any special test meter to be connected; in effect, the detectors act together as a test meter.
A second embodiment, illustrated in
The second embodiment includes the flashing LED test program for polarity orientation of the first embodiment, but adds an additional program to address the problem caused by the presence of the complex signal processing mentioned above. The additional program disables or bypasses those parts of operating algorithms that function as the filters for reducing false alarms; the basic sensitivity of the detector is not affected by such disabling of the filter. The test mode in the second embodiment is initiated by disconnecting the detector from the power supply. This can be performed from the control panel for all detectors of the system by using the panel Is reset facility, or alternatively, each detector can be briefly individually disconnected from, and reconnected to, the power supply.
Most use for the test mode of the second embodiment would come with control panels that include what is termed in the field a special “walk test” mode. When set to the “walk test” mode, the controller allows an engineer to trigger an alarm on a detector by, for example, using artificial smoke or a rapid rise in temperature, and to then see from the permanently-lit alarm LED that the control panel has accepted the alarm. After the alarm has been activated, the control panel automatically resets the detector by briefly interrupting the power supply to the zone in which the alarm is situated. Each reset process simultaneously performs a cold start on all of the detectors in the zone, thereby maintaining them in the test state. At the completion of testing, the control panel is returned to normal operation and after completing its start-up program, the internal processor in each detector operates that detector in its normal monitoring state, i.e. the LED no longer flashes, the transient filtering has been enabled, and the detector is alert to its selected hazard.
It will be appreciated that if preferred the detector can incorporate the filtering-disablement feature without the flashing LED. For example, the filtering could be disabled by a switch manually operated by a maintenance technician when in-situ testing is required.
Although it is known for some conventional detectors to utilize a LED on a flash cycle, those LEDs operate continuously as long as the power supply is connected; they are not used, as in the subject invention, to indicate that a detector has been connected with proper orientation to a power supply. At least in Germany, the type of detector LED that continues to display a flashing signal as long as power is connected must not be coloured red. However, use of red-coloured LEDs are allowed if their flashing corresponds to a “special mode of operation”; the temporary flashing during the start-up of the detector of this invention qualifies as such a special mode.
The detection of rate of rise of temperature, as illustrated in
In the arrangement illustrated in
While the present invention has been described in its preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the words which have been used are words of description rather than limitation, and that changes may be made to the invention without departing from its scope as defined by the appended claims.
Each feature disclosed in this specification (which term includes the claims) and/or shown in the drawings may be incorporated in the invention independently of other disclosed and/or illustrated features.
The text of the abstract filed herewith is repeated here as part of the specification.
A hazard detector has an electronic circuit with a start-up program for causing emission of a local indicator signal, such as a flashing signal from a LED, if power and ground terminals of the detector are connected with proper orientation, i.e. polarity, to power and ground lines of a power supply. Through this means, a person installing the hazard detector can tell immediately after connection if the detector has been connected with proper orientation, and avoids the need for introducing a hazard such as heat or smoke to test the operation of the detector. A variation uses a more sophisticated program that disables, during a test mode, complex filtering algorithms that are used by detectors to block false alarm signals; if such filtering is not disabled, it impedes normal testing of the detectors.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0300094.0 | Jan 2003 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2004/000004 | 1/5/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/8/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/061793 | 7/22/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2843726 | Kiernan | Jul 1958 | A |
3932790 | Muchnick | Jan 1976 | A |
4595914 | Siegel | Jun 1986 | A |
4818970 | Natale et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5013567 | Govenius | May 1991 | A |
5117219 | Tice et al. | May 1992 | A |
5420440 | Ketler et al. | May 1995 | A |
5475363 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5716725 | Riveron et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5751215 | Hall, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5966079 | Tanguay | Oct 1999 | A |
6040769 | Payne | Mar 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2137790 | Oct 1984 | GB |
2157871 | Oct 1985 | GB |
2175686 | Dec 1986 | GB |
2298976 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2366191 | Mar 2002 | GB |
5225466 | Sep 1993 | JP |
PCTAU9500493 | Feb 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060220891 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |