Head assembly for guardrail extruder terminal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6715735
  • Patent Number
    6,715,735
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 31, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 6, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A guardrail extruder terminal includes a rail feeder chute associated with a downstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal. The terminal also includes an impact portion associated with an upstream end thereof. The impact portion is coupled to the upstream end of the rail feeder chute and includes an impact plate positioned to face oncoming traffic, a first side member coupled to the impact plate and positioned on a roadway side of the guardrail extruder terminal, and a second side member coupled to the impact plate and positioned opposite the first side member. The impact portion may include a top plate and a bottom plate, each being coupled between the first and second side members. The top and bottom plates each have a traffic side edge positioned to face a roadway that is approximately flush with a traffic side of the rail feeder chute.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to guardrail extruder devices used with guardrail installations. In particular aspects, the invention relates to the design of impact head assemblies for such devices.




2. Description of the Related Art




Guardrail extruder terminals are a popular and effective end treatment for guardrail installations. During an end-on impact to a guardrail end, a guardrail extruder terminal will flatten and bend a corrugated rail member and extrude the flattened portion away from the roadway. Terminals of this type are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,078,366 and 4,928,928.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides an improved head assembly for a guardrail extruder terminal device. An exemplary head assembly is described that is lighter and more effective than prior art head assemblies. The exemplary head assembly provides a throat that receives a corrugated guardrail. In preferred embodiments, the throat is a squeezing throat that is narrower at the upstream end than at the downstream end. The squeezing throat compresses a rail and flattens it. A curved plate contacts the rail and extrudes it away from the head assembly. The throat is constructed from a pair of side members. In a first described embodiment, the first side member is an elongated, S-shaped plate while the second side member is a short curved plate. Alternative head constructions are described wherein the throat is constructed from side members that are formed of flat plates rather than curved plates. The flat plates may be tapered such that the upstream end of the throat is narrower than the downstream end. Alternatively, the flat plates may be non-tapered wherein the squeezing is accomplished through combined action of the throat and curved deflector plate.




The impact plate of the head assembly is vertically elongated and presents upper and lower overhangs that assist with vehicle engagement. In addition, the impact plate is provided with flanges on either side to help stiffen the plate. The head is also asymmetrical and streamlined. When the impact head is mounted on a rail member, the central point of impact is off-center with respect to the axis of the head.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an isometric view of an exemplary guardrail extruder terminal head constructed in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a plan, cross-sectional view of the head taken along the lines


2





2


in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is an exploded view of the head shown in

FIGS. 1-2

.





FIG. 4

is a plan view of the head of

FIGS. 1-3

shown affixed to a support post.





FIG. 5

is a side view of the head shown in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a plan, cross-sectional view of an alternative head having a throat with side members that are substantially flat and angled relative to each other.





FIG. 7

is a plan, cross-sectional view of a further alternative head having a throat with side members that are substantially flat and parallel to each other.





FIG. 8

is an isometric illustration of an guardrail head having an exemplary feeder chute bumper device.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIGS. 1-5

illustrate a first improved head assembly


10


used for a guardrail extruder terminal of the type described generally in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,078,366 and 4,928,928. The general operation of guardrail extruder terminal devices is described in those two patents and they are incorporated herein by reference. The head assembly


10


is shown (in

FIG. 1

) positioned on the end of a corrugated, or W-beam, guardrail


12


.




The head assembly


10


generally includes an impact portion


14


and an elongated rail feeder chute


16


. The rail feeder chute


16


surrounds the upstream portion of the rail member


12


and is made up of an upper, U-shaped channel member


18


and a lower, U-shaped channel member


20


which are secured in a spaced relation from one another by strap plates


22


. L-shaped brackets


24


,


16


are affixed to the upper and lower channels members


18


,


20


, respectively.




The impact portion


14


of the head assembly


10


has, at its upstream end, an impact plate


28


. The impact plate


28


is bent on either lateral side to present flanges


30


,


32


. The flanges


30


,


32


lend strength to the impact plate


28


, stiffen it, and assist with engagement of an impacting vehicle.




The impact plate


28


is secured by welding to a rail receiving portion


34


of the impact portion


14


. The rail receiving portion


34


includes a top plate


36


and a bottom plate


38


. The top and bottom plates


36


,


38


are affixed by welding to left and right side members


40


,


42


, respectively. The left side member


40


consists of a curved plate


44


, horizontal connecting plate


46


, and a lateral brace


48


. The lateral brace


48


is welded to the curved plate


44


, and the connecting plate


46


is welded to brace


48


in an abutting relation. It is noted that the curved plate


44


has an “S” shape such that it provides an upstream first curved portion


50


and a downstream second curved portion


52


at curves slightly in the opposite direction from the first curved portion


50


. The brace


48


is affixed to the curved plate


44


in between the first and second curves


50


,


52


. The right side member


42


includes a short curved plate


54


with vertical and horizontal braces


56


,


58


, respectively that are welded to the plate


54


to stiffen it. It is noted that, in this embodiment, the side plates


40


,


54


are curved. The side plate


54


is, unlike prior art designs significantly shorter in length than the plate


40


, as measured from upstream to downstream. This difference in length is due to the fact that there is no forward curved portion of plate


54


that would correspond to the curved portion


50


of the longer plate


40


.




It is noted that the horizontal brace


58


extends some distance outwardly from the right side of the head


10


. This is done deliberately as the horizontal brace


58


is intended to engage and break the support post


60


during a vehicular impact to the impact plate


28


of the impact head


10


that moves the head


10


downstream upon the rail member


12


.





FIGS. 4 and 5

illustrate the impact head


10


having been affixed to a support post


60


by connectors (not shown) that are disposed through the brackets


24


,


26


.




It is further noted that the impact plate


28


is vertically elongated, thereby extending both above and below the rail receiving portions of the impact portion


14


, as shown by reference numerals


62


,


64


in FIG.


5


. These overhangs permit the impact head


10


to be easily engaged by either the high bumper of trucks, SUV's and other taller vehicles and the low set bumpers of smaller cars impacting in a frontal manner, as well as engaging the vehicle frame or rocker panel to reduce vehicle intrusion when the upstream end of the head


10


is impacted by a vehicle in a sideways manner.




In a preferred embodiment, when the head


10


is assembled, the curved plate


44


and short curved plate


54


are secured in a spaced relation from one another to form a squeezing throat


66


, best seen in FIG.


2


. The throat


66


narrows in width as it approaches the upstream end of the impact head


10


. During collision wherein the impact head


10


is impacted by a colliding vehicle (not shown), the throat


66


squeezes and flattens the rail member


12


as the head


10


is pushed downstream by the vehicle onto the rail member


12


. The first curved portion


50


bends the flattened portion of the rail member


12


and extrudes it to the side of the head


10


.




There are a number of important differences between the inventive impact head


10


and the guardrail extruder heads described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,078,366 and 4,928,928. First, the portion of the head


10


that is used to bend and extrude the flattened portion of the rail


12


consists only of a single curved surface, specifically, the rail contacting surface of portion


50


on curved plate


44


. Thus, an opening is provided opposite the portion


50


upstream of the end of the small curved plate


54


. In prior arrangements, a pair of curved portions were provided by two plate members that formed a narrow opening. Elimination of one curved portion, i.e. the most downstream curved portion) reduces the extrusion force required to extrude the rail member


12


and potentially improves the trajectory of the extruded rail as it departs the head


10


. The required extrusion force is reduced at least because friction created by the removed downstream curved portion has been eliminated.




Also, as

FIGS. 2 and 4

illustrate, the inventive head


10


provides a reduced and streamlined profile along the traffic side (i.e., the side of the head


10


that will be directed toward a roadway).

FIG. 2

illustrates a central longitudinal axis


70


that is taken along the center line of the rail member


12


. The traffic side of the head


10


(shown at the bottom portion of

FIGS. 2 and 4

) does not extend as far from the axis


70


as the opposite side of the head


10


(shown at the top portion of FIGS.


2


and


4


). This streamlining is permitted by the fact that the top and bottom plates


36


,


38


each have a flattened traffic side edge


72


as opposed to the outwardly extending, generally triangular shape of the opposite sides of those plates. The head


10


is always installed on the rail


12


so that the “traffic” side is facing roadway traffic. This streamlined design ensures that the head


10


does not extend outwardly into to the stream of traffic, thereby reducing the frequency of impacts by passing vehicles and the associated maintenance costs. The flattened traffic side edge


72


should lie approximately flush with the strap plates


22


or other portions of the feeder chute


16


, or else extend only an inch or two beyond those components in the direction of the traffic lane. This “flush-side” feature helps ensure that the head


10


is less likely to be knocked off of the rail member


12


by a reverse end impact where a vehicle impacts the head from the downstream direction.




It is also noted, particularly with reference to

FIG. 2

, that the center of impact for the head (shown at around


74


) is not aligned with axis


70


of the rail


12


. This non-symmetrical design actually improves the function of the head


10


during a collision. Rather than distributing the forces of the impact substantially equally to either side of the head, as in prior designs, the force is primarily transmitted via connecting plate


46


and brace


48


to the curved plate


44


. Thus, the connecting plate


46


and brace


48


serve as the axis of force transmission for the head


10


. The curved plate


44


is the portion of the head


10


that works to bend and extrude the flattened rail member


12


. Because impact force upon the impact plate is transmitted directly to the side member


44


via the axis of force transmission, the head


10


is more efficient in collapsing the rail


12


wherein the exterior of the housing played a greater role in transmitting impact forces.




The impact head


10


of the present invention is advantageous because it has a substantially lighter weight and mass than prior art impact heads. The inventive impact heads typically weigh around 170 pounds versus 260 pounds for many prior art heads. The reduction in weight and results in improved performance for the rail terminal since a lighter head has less inertial resistance by the head during an impact. Initial movement of the impact head and extrusion of the rail member


12


will be performed with less resistance. In addition there is less of a jolting impact to a colliding vehicle due to the reduced weight of the head. The reduction in weight and mass results from a number of changes over prior art heads, including the use of thinner metals for fashioning of the head, the removal of a largely unnecessary external housing, and the removal or change in size of various plates making up the head.




Turning now to

FIGS. 6 and 7

, there are shown alternative heads


10


′ and


10


″. The heads


10


′ and


10


″ are similar in many respects of construction and operation to the head


10


already described except where indicated otherwise. Therefore, like components between the two embodiments are numbered alike. Head


10


′ has left and right side plates


40


′ and


54


′ that form a throat


66


′. The plates


40


′ and


54


′ provide essentially straight, flat sidewalls for the throat


66


′. As can be seen, the throat


66


′ narrows in width as it approaches the upstream end of the head


10


. Head


66


″ has a throat


66


″ that is formed from side member plates


40


″ and


54


″. The throat


66


″ is essentially of a constant width along its length as the two side members


40


″,


54


″ lie substantially parallel to each other along the length of the throat


66


″.





FIG. 8

illustrates a further feature of the invention wherein a feeder chute bumper device is incorporated into the impact head. With reference once again to

FIGS. 1 and 5

, it may be seen that the impact head


10


has a flared downstream end


78


on the feeder chute


16


. The use of a flared end, such as end


78


is preferred because it assists in ease of placement of the head


10


onto the rail member


12


. This flared end


78


provides upper and lower extreme downstream edge portions


80


,


82


that are formed to present an acute angle and, thus, are somewhat sharp. During an end-on impact to the head


10


, the edge portions


80


,


82


tend to impact the support posts as the head is pushed downstream along the rail by the impacting vehicle. While the presence of such edge portions


80


,


82


is not normally a problem when wooden support posts are used, it becomes a problem when metal support posts are used. For example, when steel wide flange support posts are used, the sharp edge portions


80


,


82


may actually cut the flanges of the support post downstream of the head


10


. When this occurs, the support post may pull the head


10


downwardly and, thus, resist further travel of the head


10


. This is undesirable.

FIG. 8

depicts a means of preventing that outcome. Pipe or round metal stock members


84


are secured by welding to the edge portions


80


,


82


so as to provide a blunt, rounded impacting portions to the downstream end


78


of the head


10


. The pipe or round stock members


84


preferably have a length that is the same as the width of the edge portions


80


,


82


.




While the invention has been shown or described in only some of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited, but is susceptible to other various changes without departing from the scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A head assembly for use with a guardrail installation, comprising:a rail feeder chute, comprising: a first side portion disposed on a traffic side of the head assembly, and a second side portion disposed opposite the traffic side of the head assembly, the first and second side portions being generally parallel with each other and being generally parallel with a central, longitudinal axis of the rail feeder chute; the first and second side portions being configured to receive a rail member therebetween; an upstream end; a downstream end having upper and lower edge portions that form respective acute angles with the central, longitundinal axis; each of the upper and lower edge portions terminating adjacent to and being coupled with respective rounded members that extend perpendicular to the central, longitudinal axis and the first and second side portions; and wherein the respective rounded members extend further downstream than the upper and lower edge portions, the rounded members providing blunt, rounded termination points to the rail feeder chute at the downstream end, during impact with support posts of the guardrail installation; and an impact portion coupled to the upstream end of the rail feeder chute and comprising: an impact plate positioned to face oncoming traffic, the impact plate having a greater height than width, an upper overhang extending upwardly, and a lower overhang extending downwardly; top and bottom members forming a coupling between the rail feeder chute and the impact plate; first and second side members cooperating to form a throat configured to receive the rail member as it is forced through the impact portion during a collision between an automobile and the impact plate; the first side member being positioned adjacent the traffic side of the head assembly and including a curved portion that extends away from the traffic side as the first member extends away from the rail feeder chute, the first side member being configured to direct the rail member away from the roadway during an end-on collision; the second side member being positioned opposite the traffic side of the head assembly and terminating at a vertical brace that extends generally perpendicular to the central, longitudinal axis of the rail feeder chute; the top and bottom members each having a traffic side edge positioned to face a roadway, the traffic side edge being approximately parallel with the central, longitudinal axis of the rail feeder chute; and a connecting plate coupled between the impact plate and the first portion of the first side member, the connecting plate providing an axis of force transmission for the head assembly, wherein the axis of force transmission is offset from the central, longitudinal axis of the head assembly.
  • 2. The head assembly of claim 1, wherein the impact portion further comprises a horizontal plate coupled to the second side member and the vertical brace, and extending some distance from the second side member in a direction away from the roadway.
  • 3. The head assembly of claim 1, wherein the horizontal plate is configured and positioned to engage and break a support post of the guardrail installation, during a collision.
  • 4. The head assembly of claim 1, wherein the first side member has a substantially S-shape.
  • 5. The head assembly of claim 1, wherein portions of the first and second side members that form the throat are substantially flat.
  • 6. The head assembly of claim 1, wherein portions of the first and second side members that form the throat are substantially parallel.
  • 7. A head assembly for use with a guardrail installation, comprising:a rail feeder chute having a first side portion disposed on a traffic side of the head assembly, and a second side portion disposed opposite the traffic side of the head assembly, the first and second side portions being generally parallel with each other and being generally parallel with a central, longitudinal axis of the rail feeder chute; the first and second side portions being configured to receive a rail member therebetween; and an impact portion being coupled with an upstream end of the rail feeder chute and comprising: top and bottom members forming a coupling between the rail feeder chute and an impact plate; first and second side members cooperating to form a throat configured to receive the rail member as it is forced through the impact portion during a collision; the first side member being positioned adjacent the traffic side of the head assembly and including a curved portion that extends away from the traffic side as the first member extends away from the rail feeder chute; and the second side member being positioned opposite the traffic side of the head assembly and terminating at a vertical brace that extends generally perpendicular to the central, longitudinal axis of the rail feeder chute.
  • 8. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the rail-feeder chute further comprises:an upstream end; a downstream end having upper and lower edge portions that form respective acute angles with the central, longitundinal axis; each of the upper and lower edge portions terminating adjacent to and being coupled with respective rounded members that extend perpendicular to the central, longitudinal axis and the first and second side portions; and wherein the respective rounded members extend further downstream than the upper and lower edge portions, the rounded members providing blunt, rounded termination points to the rail feeder chute at the downstream end, during impact with support posts of the guardrail installation.
  • 9. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the top member and the bottom member include respective traffic side edges positioned on the traffic side, each traffic side edge comprising an angled portion disposed at an angle to the central, longitudinal axis, and a straight portion that extends approximately parallel with the central, longitudinal axis, and wherein the straight portions are longer than the angled portions.
  • 10. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the top member and the bottom member are each coupled with the first and second side members, the top and bottom members each having respective traffic side edges positioned on the traffic side, the traffic side edges being approximately parallel with the central, longitudinal axis.
  • 11. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the top member and the bottom member are each coupled with the first and second side members, the top and bottom members each having respective traffic side edges positioned on the traffic side, the traffic side edges being approximately flush with the first side portion of the rail feeder chute.
  • 12. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the impact plate is positioned such that a vertical axis of the impact plate is horizontally offset from the central, longitudinal axis of the rail feeder chute.
  • 13. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the impact portion further comprises a connecting plate coupled between the impact plate and the first side member, the connecting plate providing an axis of force transmission for the head assembly, wherein the axis of force transmission is offset from a central longitudinal axis of the head assembly.
  • 14. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the impact portion further comprises a horizontal plate coupled to the vertical brace and extending beyond the vertical brace in a direction away from the roadway, the horizontal plate configured to engage and break a support post of the guardrail installation, during a collision.
  • 15. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein the impact plate is rectangular, and includes a long dimension that is disposed vertically, and a short dimension that is disposed horizontally, the long dimension being substantially longer than the short dimension and the impact plate extending substantially above and substantially below the rail feeder chute.
  • 16. The head assembly of claim 7, wherein respective straight portions of the first and second side members are approximately equidistant over a length of the throat.
  • 17. A guardrail extruder terminal comprising:a rail feeder chute associated with a downstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the rail feeder chute configured to receive a rail member therein; and an impact portion associated with an upstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the impact portion coupled to the upstream end of the rail feeder chute and comprising: an impact plate positioned to face oncoming traffic; a first side member coupled to the impact plate; a second side member coupled to the impact plate; and a force transmitting member coupled between the impact plate and the first side member, the force transmitting member positioned to provide an axis of force transmission for the guardrail extruder terminal, wherein the axis of force transmission is not aligned with a central longitudinal axis of the guardrail extruder terminal; a squeezing throat having an entrance and an exit located between the impact plate and the rail feeder chute, the squeezing throat formed by a portion of the first side member and the second side member; wherein the first side member includes a rail-bending portion extending beyond the exit of the squeezing throat and curving away from a roadway side of the guardrail extruder terminal and configured to direct the rail member away from the roadway during an end-on collision; and wherein the second side member does not extend beyond the exit of the squeezing throat.
  • 18. A guardrail extruder terminal comprising:a rail feeder chute associated with a downstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the rail feeder chute configured to receive a rail member therein; and an impact portion associated with an upstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the impact portion coupled to the upstream end of the rail feeder chute and comprising: an impact plate positioned to face oncoming traffic; a first side member coupled to the impact plate; a second side member coupled to the impact plate; and a force transmitting member coupled between the impact plate and the first side member, the force transmitting member positioned to provide an axis of force transmission for the guardrail extruder terminal, wherein the axis of force transmission is not aligned with a central longitudinal axis of the guardrail extruder terminal; and wherein the impact portion further comprises a top plate and a bottom plate both coupled between the first and second side members, the top and bottom plates each having a traffic side edge positioned to face a roadway, the traffic side edge being approximately flush with a traffic side of the rail feeder chute.
  • 19. A guardrail extruder terminal comprising:a rail feeder chute associated with a downstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the rail feeder chute configured to receive a rail member therein; and an impact portion associated with an upstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the impact portion coupled to the upstream end of the rail feeder chute and comprising: an impact plate positioned to face oncoming traffic; a first side member coupled to the impact plate; a second side member coupled to the impact plate; and a force transmitting member coupled between the impact plate and the first side member, the force transmitting member positioned to provide an axis of force transmission for the guardrail extruder terminal, wherein the axis of force transmission is not aligned with a central longitudinal axis of the guardrail extruder terminal; and wherein the impact portion further comprises a horizontal brace coupled to the second side member and extending some distance from the second side member in a direction away from a roadway, the horizontal brace configured to engage and break a support post during a collision.
  • 20. A guardrail extruder terminal, comprising:a rail feeder chute associated with a downstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the rail feeder chute configured to receive a rail member therein; and an impact portion associated with an upstream end of the guardrail extruder terminal, the impact portion coupled to the upstream end of the rail feeder chute and comprising: an impact plate positioned to face oncoming traffic; a first side member coupled to the impact plate and positioned on a roadway side of the guardrail extruder terminal; a second side member coupled to the impact plate and positioned opposite the first side member; and a top plate and a bottom plate both coupled between the first and second side members, the top and bottom plates each having a traffic side edge positioned to face a roadway, the traffic side edge being approximately flush with a traffic side of the rail feeder chute.
  • 21. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the impact portion further comprises a connecting plate coupled between the impact plate and the first side member, the connecting plate providing an axis of force transmission for the guardrail extruder terminal, wherein the axis of force transmission is offset from a central longitudinal axis of the guardrail extruder terminal.
  • 22. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the impact portion further comprises:a squeezing throat having an entrance and an exit located between the impact plate and the rail feeder chute, the squeezing throat formed by a portion of the first side member and the second side member; wherein the first side member includes a rail-bending portion extending beyond the exit of the squeezing throat and curving away from the roadway side of the guardrail extruder terminal and configured to direct the rail member away from the roadway during an end-on collision; and wherein the second side member does not extend beyond the exit of the squeezing throat.
  • 23. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the rail-feeder chute further comprises:an upstream end; a downstream end having upper and lower edge portions that form an acute angle; and a rounded member coupled to each edge portion.
  • 24. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the impact portion further comprises a top plate and a bottom plate both coupled between the first and second side members, the top and bottom plates each having a traffic side edge positioned to face a roadway, the traffic side edge being approximately flush with a traffic side of the rail feeder chute.
  • 25. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the impact portion further comprises a horizontal brace coupled to the second side member and extending some distance from the second side member in a direction away from a roadway, the horizontal brace configured to engage and break a support post during a collision.
  • 26. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the impact plate is vertically elongated.
  • 27. The guardrail extruder terminal of claim 20, wherein the first side member has a substantially S-shape.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/229,486 filed Aug. 31, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (107)
Number Name Date Kind
79141 McFarlin Jun 1868 A
398078 Peterson Feb 1889 A
446852 Davis Feb 1891 A
629185 Arnold Jul 1899 A
1329492 Babcock Feb 1920 A
1335302 Stout Mar 1920 A
1473118 Miller-Masury Nov 1923 A
1677796 Parks Jul 1928 A
2089929 Brickman et al. Aug 1937 A
2091195 Dennebaum Aug 1937 A
2123167 Cain Jul 1938 A
2135705 Florance Nov 1938 A
2146445 Russert et al. Feb 1939 A
2309238 Corey Jan 1943 A
2321988 Brickman Jun 1943 A
2735251 Dlugosch Feb 1956 A
2776116 Brickman Jan 1957 A
3308584 Graham Mar 1967 A
3332666 Gray Jul 1967 A
3349531 Watson Oct 1967 A
3385564 Persicke May 1968 A
3417965 Gray Dec 1968 A
3450233 Massa Jun 1969 A
3499630 Dashio Mar 1970 A
3519301 Somnitz Jul 1970 A
3521917 King Jul 1970 A
3567184 Yancey Mar 1971 A
3606222 Howard Sep 1971 A
3617076 Attwood Nov 1971 A
3637244 Strizki Jan 1972 A
3643924 Fitch Feb 1972 A
3680448 Ballingall et al. Aug 1972 A
3693940 Kendall et al. Sep 1972 A
3711881 Chapman et al. Jan 1973 A
3768781 Walker et al. Oct 1973 A
3776520 Charles et al. Dec 1973 A
3820906 Katt Jun 1974 A
3846030 Katt Nov 1974 A
3912404 Katt Oct 1975 A
3925929 Montgomery Dec 1975 A
3951556 Strizki Apr 1976 A
3967906 Strizki Jul 1976 A
3972510 Dougherty Aug 1976 A
3981486 Baumann Sep 1976 A
4063713 Anolick et al. Dec 1977 A
4071970 Strizki Feb 1978 A
4126403 Sweeney et al. Nov 1978 A
4183695 Wilcox Jan 1980 A
4236843 Chisholm Dec 1980 A
4269384 Saeed et al. May 1981 A
4278228 Rebentisch et al. Jul 1981 A
4295637 Huleck Oct 1981 A
4330106 Chisholm May 1982 A
4389134 Colas Jun 1983 A
4399980 van Schie Aug 1983 A
4490062 Chisholm Dec 1984 A
4583716 Stephens et al. Apr 1986 A
4607824 Krage et al. Aug 1986 A
4646489 Feller et al. Mar 1987 A
4655434 Bronstad Apr 1987 A
4678166 Bronstad et al. Jul 1987 A
4729690 Lavender et al. Mar 1988 A
4784515 Krage et al. Nov 1988 A
4815565 Sicking et al. Mar 1989 A
4838523 Humble et al. Jun 1989 A
4852847 Pagel Aug 1989 A
4926592 Nehls May 1990 A
4928446 Alexander, Sr. May 1990 A
4928928 Buth et al. May 1990 A
4986687 Ivey Jan 1991 A
5022782 Gertz et al. Jun 1991 A
5078366 Sicking et al. Jan 1992 A
5203543 Fleury Apr 1993 A
5214886 Hughron Jun 1993 A
5286137 Cicinnati et al. Feb 1994 A
5391016 Ivey et al. Feb 1995 A
5407298 Sicking et al. Apr 1995 A
5484217 Carroll et al. Jan 1996 A
5503495 Mak et al. Apr 1996 A
5547309 Mak et al. Aug 1996 A
5657966 Cicinnati Aug 1997 A
5664905 Thompson et al. Sep 1997 A
5765811 Alberson et al. Jun 1998 A
5775675 Sicking et al. Jul 1998 A
5797591 Krage Aug 1998 A
5924680 Sicking et al. Jul 1999 A
5931448 Sicking et al. Aug 1999 A
5957435 Bronstad Sep 1999 A
5988598 Sicking et al. Nov 1999 A
6065894 Wasson et al. May 2000 A
6109597 Sicking et al. May 2000 A
6129342 Bronstad Oct 2000 A
6210066 Dent Apr 2001 B1
6220575 Lindsay et al. Apr 2001 B1
6244571 Reid et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254063 Rohde et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260827 Sicking et al. Jul 2001 B1
6299141 Lindsay et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308809 Reid et al. Oct 2001 B1
6347904 Knighton Feb 2002 B1
6398192 Albritton Jun 2002 B1
6409156 Dent Jun 2002 B2
6416041 Sicking et al. Jul 2002 B1
6435761 Bligh et al. Aug 2002 B1
6488268 Albritton Dec 2002 B1
20010048101 Bligh et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020179894 Albritton Dec 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
278890 Feb 1970 AT
603003 Mar 1989 AU
A02184488 Nov 1990 AU
1 916 361 Mar 1963 DE
1534526 Nov 1965 DE
3708861 Oct 1988 DE
0245042 Apr 1987 EP
0 245 042 Nov 1987 EP
77 11540 Mar 1978 FR
2546932 Jun 1983 FR
2023695 Jan 1980 GB
40465 Oct 1961 LU
41444 May 1962 LU
9850637 Dec 1998 WO
0040805 Jul 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/308,296 filed Dec. 2, 2002, entitled Steel yielding Guardrail Support Post by Alberson, et al.
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report, PCT application No. PCT/US03/15002, date of mailing Aug. 14, 2003.
“BEAT Box Beam Bursting Energy Absorbing Terminal”, RSI Road Systems, Inc., http://www.roadsystems.com/beat.htm.
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US99/30463, Apr. 24, 2001.
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US98/09029, Jul. 12, 2000.
International Search Report for PCT/US99/30463, Apr. 28, 2000.
International Search Report for PCT/US98/09029, Sep. 1, 1998.
Written Opinion for PCT/US99/30463, Nov. 22, 2000.
Written Opinion for PCT/US98/09029, Mar. 29, 2000.
ER-2000 The Future of Highway Safety—SYRO (Printed in Dec. 1990; revised Oct. 1992.
Bronstad et al., Modified Breakaway Cable Terminals for Guardrails and Median Barriers, Research Results Digest, NCHRP, Transportation Research Board, Digest 12, May 1978.
Breakaway Metal Post for Highway Guardrail End Treatments U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/074,496 filed May 7, 1998 James R. Albritton (091078.0554).
Breakaway Support Post for Highway Guardrail End Treatments U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/358,017 filed Jul. 19, 1999 James R. Albritton (091078.0774).
U.S. patent application Publication No. US 2001/0013596 dated Aug. 16, 2001 for U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/410,635 filed Oct. 1, 1999 by Dean L. Sicking et al.
U.S. patent application Publication No. US 2002/0007994 dated Jan. 24, 2002 for U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/935,949 filed Aug. 23, 2001 by John D. Reid et al. Assignee: Safety By Design Company.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/229486 Aug 2000 US