This application is the national phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2018/052643, titled “HEAD MODULE FOR A RAIL VEHICLE”, filed on Feb. 2, 2018, which claims the priority of German patent application No. 102017102567.7 filed on Feb. 9, 2017, the entire disclosures of the applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a construction for a head module for a rail vehicle, which is suitable for dissipating and distributing the loads that occur in the event of a crash.
In particular it is a head module for commuter trains, in particular underground trains. In such trains, the head module is often integrated into the coach. The head module is also referred to as cab in the following, wherein it does not necessarily form a separate compartment.
In the interests of material and energy efficiency, in recent years the use of light materials and of the principles of lightweight construction has become increasingly established in rail vehicle construction. In particular the use of fibre composite materials is constantly increasing. This also applies to the design of the head modules of rail vehicles.
Known constructions here provide for attaching prefabricated modules to the substructure, which runs through the entire coach without interruption.
Thus DE 197 25 905 relates to a method for connecting a prefabricated head module made of fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) to the underframe and the coach body module. The side walls of the head module are preferably manufactured as a sandwich structure made of FRP with a core material in between. Here, special reinforcing profiles are used in the joining areas of the head module, which improve the force transmission between underframe or coach module and the FRP walls of the head module. A special design of the fibre direction of the FRP reinforcement is not provided. The reinforcing profiles are integrated into the core of the FRP walls of the head module and act as support for the bolt connection between FRP walls of the head module and underframe or coach body module. A disadvantage here is that the reinforcing fibre material between the reinforcing profile and the underframe is subjected to a compressive load and there is thus the risk of damage, due to creep, to the FRP material in this area.
DE 10 2014 204 761 A1 deals with the problem of crash safety, in particular of the front panel, in the case of the rail vehicle header modules. It is provided that the frame of the front panel has a deformation element which can absorb energy and dissipate it through its deformation. The front panel is as far as possible to move out of the frame without the formation of fragments.
This is realized in DE 10 2014 204 761 A1 in that predetermined breaking points are provided in the frame of the front panel or in proximity thereto. The predetermined breaking points are produced through the geometric design, the dimensioning of the deformation element or the material thereof. In one embodiment, the deformation element is to run partly or completely around the front panel. The frame can also be formed by the vehicle shell itself.
DE 60 2004009942 T2 deals with an impact energy absorption system for a light rail vehicle. The crash system described is predominantly arranged in the lower area of the vehicle; the passenger area is also surrounded by a protective cage.
WO 2015/011193 A1 relates to an energy absorption device for rail vehicles. The purpose of this device is to absorb a portion of the impact energy and to convert it into material deformation in the event of a crash. For this a three-dimensionally formed body made of FRP is used. This has layers with unidirectionally oriented fibres and layers with fibres arranged omnidirectionally (randomly oriented fibres). The energy absorption is realized in particular in that a counter-element strikes the energy absorption element in the longitudinal direction and destroys, in particular by fibrous disintegration, the ply or plies with randomly oriented fibres. The arrangement of the fibres without a preferred direction guarantees that the impact energy is converted when the fibres are broken down and does not lead to a delamination of different fibre layers.
WO 2010/029188 A1 discloses a self-supporting vehicle front-end which is preferentially composed of fibre composite material. The vehicle front-end has structural elements which serve to absorb energy in the event of a crash as well as other structural elements which do not have a specific function for energy dissipation. In particular, the energy-absorbing structural elements are also to consist of fibre composite material. It is furthermore provided that a series of energy-dissipating structural elements successively contributes to the energy absorption or transmits corresponding forces. The vehicle front-end has a central buffer coupling which due to its design lies in front of the external cladding of the vehicle front-end. An energy absorption element that is to absorb impacts exerted on the central buffer coupling is therefore arranged directly behind the central buffer coupling. In addition, two lateral energy absorption elements are arranged parallel thereto, which are to act as anti-overriding protection. Furthermore, the railing underneath the front window has at least one, preferably two, energy absorption elements. On each side of the front-end section, two lines for energy transmission lead from the railing into the substructure of the coach section. In addition, two energy absorption elements are arranged in front of the two A pillars in the direction of movement. The A pillars are designed to conduct kinetic energy into the roof structure and to dissipate in a controlled manner any impact energy still remaining in the event of a crash. This is necessary as conventional coach section constructions do not have any longitudinal beams arranged in the roof area, which could absorb portions of the impact energy. A disadvantage here is that a force exerted on the railing in conjunction with the two lateral lines for energy transmission can lead to a lever action on the roof construction, which sets the latter in motion, substantially perpendicular to the direction of movement of the vehicle. This can at least reduce the ability of the roof construction to absorb remaining impact energy. There is thus a disadvantageous coupling of safety systems.
DE 60 2005 004 131 T2 describes a frame for a vehicle front-end in which several yieldable regions are distributed. The document does not feature a self-supporting vehicle front-end. The frame is designed such that as extensive an energy absorption as possible takes place in the yieldable regions thereof. The roof and base portions of the frame are therefore not preferentially formed to conduct forces into the following coach body.
The named solutions are suitable for trains which can be exposed to a plurality of different collision opponents. The solutions applied are accordingly complex. The object is thus to propose a system of protective devices for a head module which are suitable in particular for underground trains and similar applications which operate on separate route networks and can be exposed to largely only similarly constructed collision opponents. In particular, a continuous substructure which reaches from the coach section into the head module should not be necessary.
In order to satisfy this object, the head module has to be suitable to be able to be placed in front of the corresponding coach sections. For this, the design features of these coach sections are to be taken into consideration.
In the present case, the sub-object is to be able to install the head module according to the invention on a coach section which is characterized by corresponding interface components. These are in particular:
The longitudinal beams are preferably manufactured from fibre composite material. All interface components have corresponding fixing options for the corresponding components of the cab. These are preferably detachable fixings, quite particularly preferably screw connections.
The head module according to the invention has three systems which convert the impact energy through irreversible deformation in the event of a crash. These systems are largely constructed independently of one another and can thus advantageously act one after the other or simultaneously without the crash-induced destruction of one system being able to impair the effectiveness of the other. The systems are substantially manufactured from fibre composite material.
The three systems are:
The three crash systems thus conduct the remaining impact forces into different components of the following coach section, which optionally have energy absorption elements themselves.
The driver's cab is preferably formed as a two-shell construction. The outer shell is connected to the three systems which convert the impact energy into deformation in the event of a crash. The inner shell lines the actual interior space which can be used by people. Both shells are formed as fibre composite structures which do not make any significant contributions to the crash resistance. The outer shell guarantees the necessary stiffness of the construction in that it is realized as a multilayered fibre composite structure, optionally with cores lying between the fibre layers. Laid, twisted or braided fibre fabrics can be used in the fibre layers. To improve the stiffness, UD fibre strands (unidirectional fibre strands) are also possible. It is advantageous that the A pillars of the outer cab have no special reinforcements for the force transmission in the event of a crash. This prevents a disadvantageous force transmission onto the ring beam from occurring in the event of a crash or at least limits it. The A pillars of the outer cab are preferably designed for the feeding-through of electrical wires. The outer cab shell is preferably constructed from fibre non-crimp fabrics which are then impregnated with a matrix material and consolidated. The construction from fibre non-crimp fabrics pre-impregnated with matrix material is also possible. The outer shell is preferably connected to the inner shell in the area of the front and side windows. Here the two shells are screwed, adhesively bonded or connected to each other in another way also combining various methods. The front window is preferably glued into the outer shell. Predetermined breaking points, which guarantee that the front window breaks away from the frame in the event of a crash and no or only a few fragments reach the interior, are preferably provided. In a further preferred embodiment, the front window has its own frame with which it is fixed in the outer shell. Predetermined breaking points are also preferred here.
The ring beam has a U shape in which the two ends of the ring beam are fixed to the upper longitudinal beams of the following coach section. The front surface of the ring beam (corresponds to the lower curvature of the U shape) is arranged on the inner surface of the upper front side of the outer cab shell. The ring beam is preferably designed as a fibre composite component. UD fibre plies which run over the entire length of the ring beam, from one fixing point on an upper longitudinal beam of the following coach section to the other fixing point on the other upper longitudinal beam of the following coach section, are used for the ring beam here. These UD fibre plies can be used alternating with fibre plies which can have differing fibre orientations. Plies of semi-finished fibre products such as woven fabrics or non-crimp fabrics are preferred. In particular, fibre plies with differing orientations or woven fabric or meshwork are used to hold the UD fibres in place before the consolidation. The ring beam is preferably manufactured together with the outer cab shell. Here, a ring beam moulded part that already has the fibre-reinforcing structure of the ring beam is placed in the mould in which the outer cab shell is manufactured. The fibre plies of the ring beam and of the outer cab shell are then impregnated with matrix material together and this is then consolidated (the matrix material is cured). It is also possible to pre-impregnate the ring beam moulded part with matrix material and then place it in the mould or place it on a support construction on which the further fibre plies of the outer shell are then placed, likewise as pre-impregnated fibre plies (e.g. as pre-pregs). Here too this is then consolidated.
A further preferred embodiment provides manufacturing the outer cab shell and the ring beam as separate components and introducing the consolidated ring beam into the consolidated outer cab shell and fixing it there, preferably gluing it in.
The railing reinforcement is likewise designed as a fibre-reinforced component. It is arranged underneath the front window and above the crash box of the head module. It extends over the entire width of the front of the cab underneath the window and above the crash box of the lower crash conduction element. Optionally the railing reinforcement can be split or designed with a lower material thickness in the centre. Inclined UD braces which introduce a portion of the crash energy into the lower longitudinal beams of the coach section run on the sides in the outer shell of the cab from the lateral ends of the railing reinforcement. Both the railing reinforcement and the UD braces are composed of fibre-reinforced material. They are also inserted as prefabricated components during the manufacture of the inner cab shell in analogy to the procedure in the case of the ring beam and consolidated. In this way the railing reinforcement is completely integrated into the inner shell. Contrary to the solution from WO 2010/029188 A1, because the A pillar of the present construction does not play a particular role in the event of a crash and in particular is not reinforced, a collision with the railing reinforcement cannot have an adverse effect on the ring beam in the roof area as the A pillar cannot transmit larger forces in this direction.
The head module has a flat nose. Force components in the vertical direction, which cause overriding, are thereby effectively prevented. This approach is advantageous as only identical train units can come together. A plate made of fibre-reinforced plastic is arranged underneath the railing reinforcement and above the central buffer coupling. This reaches substantially over the entire width of the front of the cab. Narrower designs are optionally possible. In the central part of the plate, the latter is thickened at the point which lies in front of the crash box. The plate, together with the crash box and the lower crash conduction element, forms a safety system which diverts the forces still arising behind the crash box into the underframe support of the following coach. In the event of a collision the thickened part is broken out of the plate (in the process absorbs a portion of the energy) and the further movement is absorbed by the crash box which converts it into deformation energy. The crash box has a structure known from the state of the art. In particular, it preferably consists of metal foam which is compressed in the crash under energy absorption.
The lower crash conduction element is curved in such a way that it runs in the area of the inner shell underneath the cab base and only rises in the interface area to the underframe support to the level thereof in order to make the installation possible. This is also preferably effected here with detachable metallic connections, preferably screw connections. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the crash conduction element is constructed double-angled. It runs from the crash box, which is arranged underneath the railing and above the central buffer coupling, diagonally downwards to underneath the base of the inner shell. There it changes direction into the horizontal to approximately the end of the base of the inner shell. Here it rises diagonally to the connection interface to the underframe support. The included angles between the horizontal and the angled sections of the crash conduction element preferably lie in the range between 30° and 60°. The lower crash conduction element is preferably manufactured from fibre composite material. It has a U-shaped cross section open towards the bottom (or right-angled cross section, open towards the bottom). This guarantees a particularly high stiffness even in the event of a crash. The central buffer coupling is arranged on the lower crash conduction element after the first curvature (after the section which leads from the crash box to the horizontal section of the lower crash conduction element). This is preferably effected via a metallic installation element which is fixed to the arms of the U-shaped cross section pointing downwards, preferably by means of a bolt or screw connection. The central buffer coupling is fixed to the installation element.
The central buffer coupling has a telescopic construction. It can be moved from a rest position, in which it is housed behind a flap in the front side of the head section, into a working position, in which the coupling of further train sections is possible. The central buffer coupling in addition has an energy absorption element according to the state of the art. This energy absorption element converts a portion of the impact energy into deformation work in the event of a crash, if the collision takes place while the central buffer coupling is in the working position.
Fibre composite materials are used as preferred materials for the cab shells and the three systems for the event of a crash. Fixing elements etc. can advantageously be manufactured from metal. The fibre composite materials are preferably plastics, preferably resins, particularly preferably epoxy resins or phenolic resin systems, reinforced with carbon fibres, glass fibres or basalt fibres.
The construction of the cab and the design of the systems are preferably effected using computer-aided simulation processes, which allow the design to be carried out in accordance with the regulations in force. The simulation processes and computer-aided design tools are known to a person skilled in the art.
The following figures illustrate a preferred embodiment of the head module for a rail vehicle designed according to the invention.
The railing reinforcement 711 and the UD braces 710 which transmit the force from the railing reinforcement 711 to the introduction points 712 into the lower longitudinal beams of the following coach section are integrated into the lower part of the inner shell.
The lower crash conduction element 730 runs underneath the lower part of the inner shell. On the front side of the cab the plate 734 is represented. The crash box 733 is arranged behind it. In the event of a crash, the collision takes place on the plate 734, which passes the force onto the crash box 733 and dissipates it as far as possible there. Remaining impact energy is passed on into the lower crash conduction element 730 and there is transferred at the fixing point 732 into the underframe support of the following coach section. In the horizontal section of the lower crash conduction element 730, the openings 731 for fixing the central buffer coupling are visible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 102 567.7 | Feb 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/052643 | 2/2/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/146014 | 8/16/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6431083 | Carstensen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
20070186802 | Gough | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100064931 | Heinisch et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100218701 | Graf et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20150033978 | Oohashi et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160339821 | Akaike et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101801756 | Aug 2010 | CN |
102216141 | Oct 2011 | CN |
106347387 | Jan 2017 | CN |
19725905 | Dec 1998 | DE |
69818357 | Jun 2004 | DE |
602004009942 | Oct 2008 | DE |
602005004131 | Dec 2008 | DE |
102014204761 | Sep 2015 | DE |
102014218413 | Mar 2016 | DE |
2698840 | Jun 1994 | FR |
2411630 | Sep 2005 | GB |
2013237415 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2014088177 | May 2014 | JP |
2014088177 | May 2014 | JP |
2016215896 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2008034745 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009040309 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009072843 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2010029188 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2015011193 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action dated May 26, 2020 for Chinese patent application No. 201880009591.5, English translation provided by Global Dossier. |
First Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020 for Japanese patent application No. 2019-563675, English translation provided by Global Dossier. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2018/052643 dated May 4, 2018, ISA/CN. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200010098 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |