The present invention relates generally to fire blocking and containment systems used in the construction of buildings and, more particularly, to fireblocks and fire blocking systems used to seal static and dynamic head-of-wall construction joints and gaps, as well as other mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP) penetrations commonly associated with wall construction and assemblies.
Metal framing assemblies used to construct commercial and residential buildings are common in the building construction arts. These metal framing assemblies are generally constructed from a plurality of metal framing members including studs, joists, trusses, and other metal posts and beams formed from sheet metal and frequently fabricated to have the same general cross-sectional dimensions as standard wood members used for similar purposes. Metal framing members are typically constructed by roll-forming 12 to 24 gauge galvanized sheet steel. Although many cross-sectional shapes are available, the primary shapes used in building construction are C-shaped studs and U-shaped tracks.
In the building construction trade, a head-of-wall joint (also sometimes referred to as a top-of-wall joint) refers to the linear junction or interface existing between a top section of a framing/wallboard wall assembly and the ceiling (where the ceiling may be a next-level floor or corrugated pan roof deck, for example). Head-of-wall joints often present a serious challenge in terms of reducing or preventing the spread of smoke and fire during a building fire. In this regard and in common practice, a wall to ceiling connection of many newly constructed buildings consists essentially of an inverted U-shaped elongated steel channel (or track) configured to receive steel studs between the legs of the shaped channel. A wallboard is generally attached to at least one side of the studs. The studs and wallboard are in many instances spaced apart from the ceiling a short gap distance in order to allow for ceiling deflections caused by seismic activity or moving overhead loads. Channel and stud assemblies that allow for ceiling deflections are commonly referred to as dynamic head-of-wall systems. Exemplary steel stud wall constructions may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,854,096 and 4,805,364 both to Smolik, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,203 to Paquette. Exemplary dynamic head-of-wall systems having steel stud wall constructions may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,760 to Brady, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,705 to Orszulak et al.
In order to contain the spread of smoke and fire, a fire resistant material such as, for example, mineral wool is often times stuffed into the gaps between the ceiling and wallboard (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,913,788 to Herren). For example, mineral wool is often stuffed between a steel header track (e.g., an elongated U-shaped channel) and a corrugated steel roof deck (used in many types of steel and concrete building constructions); a fire resistant and generally elastomeric spray coating is then applied onto the exposed mineral wool to thereby form a fire resistant joint seal (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,240,905 to Stahl). In certain situations where the ceiling to wallboard gap is relatively small, a fire resistant and elastomeric caulk is commonly applied so as to fill any small gaps. In still another approach and as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,471,805 and 5,755,066 both to Becker, a slidable noncombustible secondary wall member is fastened to an especially configured steel header track and immediately adjacent to the wallboard. In this configuration, the secondary wall member provides a fire barrier that is able to accommodate ceiling deflections. All of these approaches, however, are relatively labor intensive and thus expensive.
Intumescent materials have long been used to seal certain types of construction gaps such as, for example, conduit through-holes. In this regard, intumescent and fire barrier materials (often referred to as firestop materials or fire retardant materials) have been used to reduce or eliminate the passage of smoke and fire through openings between walls and floors and the openings caused by through-penetrations (i.e., an opening in a floor or wall which passes all the way through from one room to another) in buildings, such as the voids left by burning or melting cable insulation caused by a fire in a modern office building. Characteristics of fire barrier materials suitable for typical commercial fire protection use include flexibility prior to exposure to heat, the ability to insulate and/or expand, and the ability to harden in place upon exposure to fire (i.e., to char sufficiently to deter the passage of heat, smoke, flames, and/or gases). Although many such materials are available, the industry has long sought better and more effective uses of these materials and novel approaches for better fire protection, especially in the context of dynamic head-of-wall construction joints and gaps.
Thus, and although construction joints and gaps are generally sealed in some manner (e.g., mineral wool and/or elastomeric coatings; see also, U.S. Patent Application No. 2006/0137293 to Klein), there are relatively few products and methods available that effectively and efficiently seal head-of-wall construction joints and gaps (to thereby significantly enhance the ability of such joints and gaps to withstand smoke and fire penetration). In particular, there are very few products and methods available that address the needs for adequate fire protection and sealing of dynamic head-of-wall systems associated with steel stud wall constructions. Thus, there is still a need in the art for new and improved fireblock systems and fire retarding devices, including related wall assemblies and methods. The present invention fulfills these needs and provides for further related advantages.
In brief, the present invention in one embodiment is directed to a fire retardant head-of-wall assembly configured to seal a linear head-of-wall construction joint or gap when exposed to a heat source. The innovative fire retardant head-of-wall assembly comprises: (1) an elongated sheet-metal footer track; (2) an elongated sheet-metal header track confronting and vertically spaced apart from the footer track, the header track including a web integrally connected to a pair of spaced apart and downwardly extending sidewalls, the web having a top exterior web surface positioned adjacent to a ceiling and a bottom interior web surface, each sidewall having inner and outer sidewall surfaces, each sidewall having an upper sidewall portion adjacent to the web and a lower sidewall portion; (3) an elongated intumescent strip affixed lengthwise on at least one of the outer sidewall surfaces of the pair of sidewalls, the intumescent strip being positioned on the upper sidewall portion, the intumescent strip having an outer strip surface offset from the outer sidewall surface an intumescent strip offset distance; (4) a plurality of sheet-metal studs having upper and lower end portions, the studs being vertically positioned between the spaced apart and confronting footer and header tracks such that the lower end portions are received into the footer track and the upper end portions are received into the header track, each of the upper end portions of the plurality of studs being spaced apart from the bottom interior web surface of the header track a first gap distance that allows for ceiling deflections; and (5) wallboard attached to at least one side of the plurality of studs, the wallboard having a top linear end surface positioned apart from the ceiling a second gap distance that allows for ceiling deflections and defines the construction joint of gap, the wallboard having an elongated upper interior wallboard surface in contact with the outer strip surface of the elongated intumescent strip.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a fire retardant head-of-wall assembly, comprising: (1) an elongated sheet-metal footer track; (2) an elongated sheet-metal header track confronting and vertically spaced apart from the footer track, the header track including a web integrally connected to a pair of spaced apart and downwardly extending sidewalls, each sidewall having inner and outer sidewall surfaces, each sidewall having an upper sidewall portion adjacent to the web and a lower sidewall portion separated from the upper sidewall portion by an outwardly protruding curved bend that runs lengthwise along the sidewall; (3) an elongated intumescent strip affixed lengthwise on at least one of the outer sidewall surfaces of the pair of sidewalls, the intumescent strip being positioned on the upper sidewall portion; (4) a plurality of sheet-metal studs having upper and lower end portions, the studs being vertically positioned between the spaced apart and confronting footer and header tracks such that the lower end portions are received into the footer track and the upper end portions are received into the header track; and (5) wallboard attached to at least one side of the plurality of studs, the wallboard having an elongated upper interior wallboard surface in contact with or proximate to the outer strip surface of the elongated intumescent strip.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to an elongated U-shaped sheet-metal track that includes (1) a web integrally connected to a pair of spaced apart and outwardly extending sidewalls, (2) a plurality of vertically aligned slots positioned along at least one of the sidewalls, and (3) at least one intumescent strip positioned along the sidewall having the plurality of vertically aligned slots and juxtaposed to the web.
The drawings are intended to be illustrative and symbolic representations of certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention and as such they are not necessarily drawn to scale. In addition, it is to be expressly understood that the relative dimensions and distances depicted in the drawings (and described in the “Detailed Description of the Invention” section) are exemplary and may be varied in numerous ways without departing from the scope and essence of the present invention. Finally, like reference numerals have been used to designate like features throughout the several views of the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding elements, and more particularly to
In this configuration and as best shown in
As best shown in
The intumescent strip 34 is commercially available (e.g., 3M Company or The Rectorseal Corporation, U.S.A.) and preferably has an adhesive backing that allows it to be readily affixed onto the outer sidewall surface 30. Exemplary in this regard are the heat expandable compositions disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,207,085 to Ackerman (incorporated herein by reference), which discloses a composition that, when subjected to heat, expands to form a heat-insulating barrier. A preferred composition contains expandable graphite (˜10-40 wt %), a fire retardant (˜10-40 wt %), and an optional inorganic intumescent filler (<50 wt %), all of which are admixed together with a resinous emulsion (˜30-60 wt %). The expandable graphite is generally manufactured by the oxidation of graphite flake in sulfuric acid (with such intercalated graphite being swellable or expandable up to about 100 times of its original volume when heated at high temperature). The fire retardant generally includes amine/phosphorous containing salts such as, for example, amine salts of phosphoric acid or lower alkyl esters thereof. A preferred fire retardant is a C2-C8 alkyl diamine phosphate. Intumescent activation or expansion generally begins at about 392° F. In order to ensure that the intumescent strip 34 stays in place when exposed to heat, it has been found that a commercially available (e.g., 3M Company, U.S.A.) fire-retardant epoxy adhesive may preferably also be used. In other words, a fire-retardant adhesive (not shown) may be interposed between the intumescent strip 34 and the outer sidewall surfaces 30 of the pair of sidewalls 28. In some embodiments, the intumescent strip 34 may on its top surface include a protective foil tape or polymeric coating 35 to protect the underlying intumescent material from degradation that may occur due to wall cycling.
In a preferred embodiment, the elongated sheet-metal header track 16 (of the head-of-wall assembly 10) also comprises a plurality of vertically aligned slots 36 positioned at regular intervals along the pair of downwardly extending sidewalls 28. Each slot 36 has a preferred slot length D5 that is generally at least about two times greater than the first and second gap distances D1, D2, or preferably ranging from about ½ inch to about 6 inches (wherein each slot 36 may be partially covered by the intumescent strip 34). In this preferred embodiment, a plurality of fasteners 38 secure the upper end portions 20 of the plurality of studs 18 to the header track 16, with each fastener 38 extending through one of the slots 36 and preferably being positioned about midway along each respective slot length D3 as shown in
For purposes of illustration and not restriction, the following Example demonstrates various aspects and utility of the present invention.
Several mock-ups of a fire retardant head-of-wall assembly in accordance with the present invention were constructed and tested to evaluate the joint system's resistance to a heat source followed by a hose stream in accordance with Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.'s standards set forth in its Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems—UL 2079. Each mock-up was constructed so as to have a ⅜ inch head-of-wall linear construction gap, and the construction gap was cycled over this distance (translating to a maximum of a ¾ inch gap when the ceiling was upwardly deflected a maximum distance of ⅜ inch, and to a minimum of no gap when the ceiling was downwardly deflected a maximum distance of ⅜ inch) in order to demonstrate that the head-of-wall assembly was able to withstand (meaning without failure of any of the wall assembly components) various levels of cycling. More specifically, the several mock-ups successfully passed cycling Levels I, II, and III (with Level I=1 cycle/min for 500 cycles (thermal expansion/contraction), Level II=10 cycles/min for 500 cycles (wind sway forces), and Level III=30 cycles/min (seismic forces)). After the successful cycling demonstration, the linear construction gap of one of the mock-ups was opened to its ¾ inch maximum and the whole mock-up was for a two hour period placed parallel and adjacent to an open oven heated to 1800° F. During this period no appreciable amounts of smoke or fire penetrated through the fire retardant head-of-wall assembly, and substantially all of the unexposed or far side wall materials (inclusive of the intumescent strip) remained intact and in place (meaning that the mock-up passed UL's “F-rating” for restricting fire passage). In addition, all of the unexposed or far side wall materials (inclusive of the intumescent strip) remained below 425° F. (meaning that the mock-up passed UL's “T-rating” for restricting thermal passage). Finally, and within about 5 minutes of being exposed to the open oven heat source, the exposed or near wall was subjected to a “hose stream” test (i.e., a 4 inch fire hose having a straight nozzle water stream at 30 psi for 30 seconds) and no direct water stream penetrated through the wall (meaning that the mock-up passed UL's “H-rating” for restricting hose stream passage). In view of the foregoing, the inventive fire retardant head-of-wall assembly has been certified as complaint with respect to Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.'s standards set forth in its Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems—UL 2079.
While the present invention has been described in the context of the embodiments illustrated and described herein, the invention may be embodied in other specific ways or in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing descriptions, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/197,166 filed on Aug. 22, 2008. This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/997,521 filed on Oct. 4, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/007,439 filed on Dec. 13, 2007, which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2218426 | Hulbert, Jr. | Oct 1940 | A |
2683927 | Maronek | Jul 1954 | A |
3324615 | Zinn | Jun 1967 | A |
3397495 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3481090 | Joseph | Dec 1969 | A |
3537219 | Navarre | Nov 1970 | A |
3566559 | Dickson | Mar 1971 | A |
3744199 | Navarre | Jul 1973 | A |
3935681 | Voiturier et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3955330 | Wendt | May 1976 | A |
3964214 | Wendt | Jun 1976 | A |
4011704 | O'konski | Mar 1977 | A |
4103463 | Dixon | Aug 1978 | A |
4130972 | Varlonga | Dec 1978 | A |
4164107 | Kraemling et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4283892 | Brown | Aug 1981 | A |
4329820 | Wendt | May 1982 | A |
4649089 | Thwaites | Mar 1987 | A |
4672785 | Salvo | Jun 1987 | A |
4723385 | Kallstrom | Feb 1988 | A |
5010702 | Daw et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5103589 | Crawford | Apr 1992 | A |
5125203 | Daw | Jun 1992 | A |
5127203 | Paquette | Jul 1992 | A |
5127760 | Brady | Jul 1992 | A |
5157883 | Meyer | Oct 1992 | A |
5173515 | von Bonin et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5285615 | Gilmour | Feb 1994 | A |
5325651 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5394665 | Johnson | Mar 1995 | A |
5471805 | Becker | Dec 1995 | A |
5644877 | Wood | Jul 1997 | A |
5687538 | Frobosilo et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5755066 | Becker | May 1998 | A |
5787651 | Horn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806261 | Huebner et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5913788 | Herren | Jun 1999 | A |
5921041 | Egri, II | Jul 1999 | A |
5927041 | Sedlmeier et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930963 | Nichols | Aug 1999 | A |
5950385 | Herren | Sep 1999 | A |
6058668 | Herren | May 2000 | A |
6176053 | St. Germain | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6213679 | Frobosilo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216404 | Vellrath | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233888 | Wu | May 2001 | B1 |
6374558 | Surowiecki | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6470638 | Larson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6732481 | Stahl, Sr. | May 2004 | B2 |
6799404 | Spransy | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6871470 | Stover | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7240905 | Stahl, Sr. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
20020170249 | Yulkowski | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040010998 | Turco | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040045234 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040211150 | Bobenhausen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060137293 | Klein | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070261343 | Stahl, Sr. et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080250738 | Howchin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090038764 | Pilz | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049777 | Pilz et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049781 | Pilz et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090178369 | Pilz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2234347 | Oct 1999 | CA |
2411212 | Aug 2005 | GB |
WO 03038206 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2007103331 | Sep 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100170172 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60997521 | Oct 2007 | US | |
61007439 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12197166 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 12727111 | US |