The embodiments relate to head-wearable display devices and, in particular, to head-wearable display devices with multiple reflective surfaces that have an ultra-wide field of view and utilize a narrow-beam light source, such as a Liquid Crystal on Silicon display light source.
A Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS) display offers a relatively bright, high-resolution display, and thus would be a desirable source of light for an ultra-wide field of view (UWFOV) reflective surface. However, narrow-beam displays, such as an LCoS display, emit light in a relatively narrow +/−10-degree cone. The narrowness of the beam makes it difficult or impracticable to use an LCoS display in conjunction with a UWFOV reflective surface, such as a 130-degree UWFOV reflective surface. Placing a lens in front of the narrow-beam display may diverge the light, but may not make the light field wide enough to support the parameters of a UWFOV reflective surface. In particular, because the curvature of the UWFOV reflective surface reflects the pixels of the narrow-beam display from particular points on the reflector, the resulting reflector power may be too high, resulting in the light focusing inside of an eye instead of at the fovea of the eye.
The embodiments relate to head-wearable display devices and, in particular, to head-wearable display devices that have an ultra-wide field of view (UWFOV) and utilize a narrow-beam light source, such as a Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS) display, a digital light processing (DLP) display, or a laser display. In one embodiment, the head-wearable display device includes a frame, a narrow-beam light source fixed with respect to the frame, a UWFOV reflective surface fixed with respect to the frame, and a diverging reflective surface fixed with respect to the frame that is configured to receive light emitted from the narrow-beam light source and reflect the light toward the UWFOV reflective surface to spread the light across the UWFOV reflective surface.
In one embodiment, the narrow-beam light source comprises one of an LCoS display, a DLP display, and a laser display. In one embodiment, the head-wearable display device includes a diverging lens fixed with respect to the narrow-beam light source that is configured to receive the light emitted from the narrow-beam light source and transmit the light toward the diverging reflective surface.
In one embodiment, the UWFOV reflective surface has a field of view (FOV) greater than about 100 degrees. In another embodiment, the UWFOV reflective surface has an FOV greater than about 120 degrees, and in yet another embodiment, the UWFOV reflective surface has an FOV greater than about 140 degrees. In one embodiment, the UWFOV reflective surface is configured to substantially collimate the light. In some embodiments, the UWFOV reflective surface converges the light in order to substantially collimate the light.
In another embodiment, a method for presenting an image to an eye is provided. Light comprising imagery is emitted from a narrow-beam light source. By way of non-limiting example, the imagery may comprise video stream imagery or a static image. A diverging reflective surface reflects the light toward a UWFOV reflective surface. The UWFOV reflective surface reflects the light toward the eye.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
Any flowcharts discussed herein are necessarily discussed in some sequence for purposes of illustration, but unless otherwise explicitly indicated, the embodiments are not limited to any particular sequence of steps. The term “about” used herein in conjunction with a numeric value means any value that is within a range of ten percent greater than or ten percent less than the numeric value.
The embodiments relate to head-wearable display devices and, in particular, to head-wearable display devices that have an ultra-wide field of view (UWFOV) and utilize a narrow-beam light source, such as a Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS) display, a digital light processing (DLP) display, and a laser display. The embodiments are particularly applicable to UWFOV reflective surfaces, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,625,200 and 8,781,794, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein. The UWFOV reflective surfaces discussed herein typically, but not necessarily, have a 100-degree or greater field of view (FOV) for each eye of a user and a combined 180-degree FOV for both eyes of the user.
In order to expand a beam of the LCoS or similar microdisplay to fill a wide FOV, the image needs to be expanded and the emitted light needs to be directed into a wider area for reflection from the UWFOV reflective surface. The embodiments may utilize a non-rotationally symmetric, aspherical design due to the rectangular form of a display, and a near-to-the-eye afocal light field.
A UWFOV reflective surface 20 is fixed with respect to the frame 12. In one embodiment, the UWFOV reflective surface 20 may be substantially similar or identical to the reflective surfaces disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,625,200 and/or 8,781,794. The UWFOV reflective surface 20 may, for example, have a 100-degree or greater horizontal FOV for each eye 16 of the user 14; a 120-degree or greater horizontal FOV for each eye 16 of the user 14; or a 135-degree or greater horizontal FOV for each eye 16 of the user 14.
A narrow-beam light source 22 is fixed with respect to the frame 12. The narrow-beam light source 22 may comprise any suitable narrow-beam display or microdisplay, such as, for example, an LCoS display, a DLP display, or a laser display. In one embodiment, the microdisplay has a 4096×2240 pixel resolution and an area of 18.43 mm by 10.08 mm. The narrow-beam light source 22 may comprise a diagonal dimension of less than one inch, such as, by way of non-limiting example, 0.7 inches, and may emit light in a relatively narrow cone, such as a +/−10-degree cone. In one embodiment, the narrow-beam light source 22 is mapped to the UWFOV reflective surface 20. In particular, the narrow-beam light source 22 comprises a display panel that has a plurality of pixels at a particular resolution, and the pixels are mapped to corresponding locations on the UWFOV reflective surface 20. Each location on the UWFOV reflective surface 20 is configured to reflect and collimate light emitted by the corresponding pixels toward the eye 16 of the user 14. The UWFOV reflective surface 20 is engineered such that light received from pixels of the narrow-beam light source 22 other than the particular corresponding pixels is reflected in a direction other than the eyes 16 of the user 14.
The UWFOV display device 10 includes a diverging reflective surface 24 that is fixed with respect to the frame 12. The diverging reflective surface 24 is configured to receive light emitted from the narrow-beam light source 22 and reflect the light toward the UWFOV reflective surface 20 to spread the light completely across the UWFOV reflective surface 20. The UWFOV reflective surface 20 receives the light from the diverging reflective surface 24 and reflects those light rays that are emitted by the corresponding pixels of the narrow-beam light source 22 toward the eye 16 of the user 14. In some embodiments, the UWFOV reflective surface 20 is configured to substantially collimate the light. While for purposes of illustration only the right eye 16 of the user 14 is shown in
The UWFOV reflective surface 20 is a non-rotationally symmetric surface and, in some embodiments, is a concave surface, that is mapped to the narrow-beam light source 22. Such mapping may be implemented as disclosed herein as well as in conjunction, for example, with mechanisms disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,781,794 (hereinafter the '794 Patent). As disclosed in the '794 Patent, non-symmetrical lens surfaces, such as the UWFOV reflective surface 20, can be engineered to, among other advantages, increase an FOV of the user 14, such that imagery presented by the narrow-beam light source 22 can be reflected from a desired surface element or surface elements of the UWFOV reflective surface 20 toward a predetermined location of the eye 16. Such surface elements may overlap one another. In one embodiment, the UWFOV reflective surface 20 comprises a plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding regions of the narrow-beam light source 22 toward the predetermined location of the eye 16. The UWFOV reflective surface 20 comprises multiple, such as thousands, of different surface elements that are mapped to corresponding regions of the narrow-beam light source 22.
Similarly, a 3D normal 42 at the selected surface element 40 is adjusted to bisect the angle formed by the line 38 and a line 44 from the selected surface element 40 to the predetermined location 26 of the eye 16. Once so adjusted, the slope of the selected surface element 40 is determined. This process may be repeated for each surface element of the narrow-beam light source 22 across the entire FOV to define the overall surfaces of the diverging reflective surface 24 and the UWFOV reflective surface 20. The process is iterative and may be repeated hundreds of thousands of times to define the diverging reflective surface 24 and the UWFOV reflective surface 20 with as little error as possible. During the iterations, adjustments may be made to the slopes to minimize the overall error of the system. Each surface element of the UWFOV reflective surface 20 also collimates, or substantially collimates, the light received from the corresponding surface element of the diverging reflective surface 24, and thus also includes the collimation power in the objective for the multi-objective adaptation process that occurs to create the surfaces of the diverging reflective surface 24 and the UWFOV reflective surface 20.
The system produces a point cloud representing the UWFOV reflective surface 20. For example, the point cloud may comprise 500×300 points situated along the UWFOV reflective surface 20 in three dimensions. This point cloud may be imported into a 3D computer-aided design (CAD) system, such as, by way of non-limiting example, Creo. The 3D CAD system may then connect all the points in the point cloud with a non-uniform rational basis spline. The connected points may then be tested in an optics test program, or converted into a physical lens with 3D printing or injection molding.
A set of light beam characteristics defines the focal length of each aspect of the UWFOV display device 10, such that the resulting light to the eye 16 is substantially collimated, thus having zero diopters of vergence, sometimes referred to as 0D. In this regard,
Because the UWFOV display device 10 is a near-to-the-eye system and the distance from the narrow-beam light source 22 to the eye 16 is substantially shorter than, for example, distances utilized in a telescope system, the vergence, or diopter, of light emitted from the narrow-beam light source 22 changes rapidly throughout the UWFOV display device 10. As discussed above, in some embodiments, pixels of the narrow-beam light source 22 are mapped to corresponding locations on the UWFOV reflective surface 20, and the locations on the UWFOV reflective surface 20 are configured to reflect and collimate light emitted by the corresponding pixels toward the eye 16.
In this example, assume that light rays 46 are emitted from the location 48 of the narrow-beam light source 22. Further assume that the location 48 is mapped to a location 58 of the UWFOV reflective surface 20 via a location 59 of the diverging reflective surface 24. The vergence is defined as 1/S, where S is expressed in meters. Thus, if the initial distance D1 is 4 cm, the light rays 46 have a vergence of −1/0.04=−25D for the distance D1. The vergence is negative because the light rays 46 are diverging. If, for example, the diverging reflective surface 24 provides a further divergence of −20D by virtue of having a focal length of, for example, 5 cm, and vergence=1/(focal length in meters), then the current vergence of the light rays 46 is −25D+(−20 D)=−45D, since vergence is linearly additive. The light rays 46 are reflected by the diverging reflective surface 24 toward the UWFOV reflective surface 20. The location 58 of the UWFOV reflective surface 20 is configured to collimate the light rays 46 that originate from the location 48 of the narrow-beam light source 22 to bring the vergence of the light rays 46 to 0D, such that collimated light rays 46 are reflected toward the eye 16. If a lens is positioned between the narrow-beam light source 22 and the diverging reflective surface 24, the vergence of the light rays 46 will be further modified.
The UWFOV display device 10 produces a wide FOV by angling the reflecting points along the UWFOV reflective surface 20 to reflect the light from the correct pixels of the narrow-beam light source 22, which introduces a further constraint on the bending of the light rays 46, which is a function of the display width and the expected FOV.
As discussed previously, the UWFOV reflective surface 20 not only reflects light emitted from the narrow-beam light source 22 toward the predetermined location 26 of the eye 16 but also collimates, or substantially collimates, the light so that the light can be focused by the user 14.
(LClcos)=(display_width_mm/2)/(tan(thetaL2))*0.001; % [m]
where display_width_mm is the width of the narrow-beam light source 22, thetaL2 is the half angle of the cone of light (in this example, 11.2 degrees).
The above calculation places the distance 62 (LSlcos) in meters. The distance 62 (LSlcos) may now be converted to a vergence. The vergence is negative since the light is diverging. The vergence (Vlcos) is measured in diopters [D]. The distance 62 LSlcos is the focal length to the virtual light source 64. The vergence (Vlcos) can be determined in accordance with the following formula:
Vlcos=−1/(LSlcos): [D]
Generally, at a high level, a set of values for the radius of curvature for the diverging reflective surface 24 and the UWFOV reflective surface 20 is cycled through and tested to determine how well the diverging reflective surface 24 and the UWFOV reflective surface 20 reflect the field points (the outer edges of the FOV) into the eye 16, while also collimating the light to the eye 16. The vergence at each surface element of the UWFOV reflective surface 20 should be zero so that reflected light is collimated. The vergence of the light ray 60 arriving at the diverging reflective surface 24 (VatD) is determined in accordance with the following formula:
VatD=−(1/(LSlcos+Lld))
where LSlcos=the distance 62 and Lld=a distance 66 between the narrow-beam light source 22 and the diverging reflective surface 24.
VatD is negative since the light is diverging. The transfer vergence (Vtld) in the intervening space between the narrow-beam light source 22 and the diverging reflective surface 24 is determined in accordance with the following formula:
Vtld=VatD−Vlcos;
The vergence power of the diverging reflective surface 24 (Vdcalc) is based upon the radius of curvature (in meters) of the diverging reflective surface 24, selected during the respective multiple iterations through the plurality of possible values for the radius of curvature in accordance with the following formula:
Vdcalc=−2/(Rd),
where Rd is the radius of curvature of the diverging reflective surface 24.
The vergence of the light leaving the diverging reflective surface 24 (Vcurr) can be determined by summing all the vergences previously determined above in accordance with the following formula:
Vcurr=Vlcos+Vtld+Vdcalc.
This translates into a distance to the new virtual light source 64 of:
Lcurr=−1/Vcurr: [m]
The vergence at the UWFOV reflective surface 20 (Vatc) can be determined in accordance with the following formula:
Vatc=−1/(Lcurr+ Ldc);
where Ldc is a distance from the diverging reflective surface 24 to the UWFOV reflective surface 20.
In order to collimate the light into the eye 16, the power of the UWFOV reflective surface 20 cancels the vergence (Vatc) arriving at the UWFOV reflective surface 20 mirror. Thus, the radius of curvature (Rc) at this point on the UWFOV reflective surface 20 is:
Rc=−2/Vatc.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/065,328, filed on Oct. 17, 2014, entitled “MULTIPLE-REFLECTOR ULTRA-WIDE FIELD OF VIEW DISPLAY DEVICE,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3880509 | Herndon | Apr 1975 | A |
4026641 | Bosserman et al. | May 1977 | A |
4176468 | Marty, Jr. | Dec 1979 | A |
4293196 | Hilbert | Oct 1981 | A |
4406532 | Howlett | Sep 1983 | A |
H000423 | Mohon et al. | Feb 1988 | H |
5184250 | Lacroix | Feb 1993 | A |
5253116 | Lacroix | Oct 1993 | A |
5309169 | Lippert | May 1994 | A |
5325386 | Jewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5347400 | Hunter | Sep 1994 | A |
5388990 | Beckman | Feb 1995 | A |
5436763 | Chen | Jul 1995 | A |
5561538 | Kato et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572343 | Okamura et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581271 | Kraemer | Dec 1996 | A |
5641288 | Zaenglein, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5699194 | Takahashi | Dec 1997 | A |
5701132 | Kollin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701202 | Takahashi | Dec 1997 | A |
5712649 | Tosaki | Jan 1998 | A |
5714967 | Okamura et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715094 | Ansley et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5754344 | Fujiyama | May 1998 | A |
5757544 | Tabata et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774268 | Takahashi | Jun 1998 | A |
5798738 | Yamada | Aug 1998 | A |
5798739 | Teitel | Aug 1998 | A |
5803738 | Latham | Sep 1998 | A |
5834676 | Elliott | Nov 1998 | A |
5844530 | Tosaki | Dec 1998 | A |
5936663 | Tabata et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5982343 | Iba et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999147 | Teitel | Dec 1999 | A |
6038387 | Machida | Mar 2000 | A |
6140979 | Gerhard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140980 | Spitzer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160666 | Rallison et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185045 | Hanano | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201646 | Togino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215593 | Bruce | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266194 | Tanijiri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6347869 | Xu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6407724 | Waldern | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6445362 | Tegreene | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504658 | Bignolles et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522474 | Cobb et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529331 | Massof et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6549332 | Kimura | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6611253 | Cohen | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633304 | Anabuki et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646811 | Inoguchi | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6704128 | Takeyama et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6731434 | Hua et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751026 | Tomono | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771423 | Geist | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788442 | Potin | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795042 | Nagata et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813085 | Richards | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829087 | Freese et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6873471 | Coates et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6919866 | Kanevsky et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919867 | Sauer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6963379 | Tomono | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7002551 | Azuma et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009773 | Chaoulov et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016116 | Dolgoff | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7063256 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068444 | Nishi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072096 | Holman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088516 | Yagi | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095562 | Peng et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7110013 | Ebersole et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119965 | Rolland et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7151639 | Lung | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7295377 | Edelmann | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7307791 | Li et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7324081 | Friedrich et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339742 | Amitai et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7385600 | Marion | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391573 | Amitai | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7407106 | Yee et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7432879 | Schonlau | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446941 | Fukuda | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7499217 | Cakmakci et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7545571 | Garoutte et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7547101 | Fuziak, Jr. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573525 | Yamasaki | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7605773 | Janssen | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613356 | Uchiyama et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623294 | Harada et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7626562 | Iwasaki | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7663793 | Doucet | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7732694 | Rosenberg | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751122 | Amitai | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765083 | Zank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7804507 | Yang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7812815 | Banerjee et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7843403 | Spitzer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7928927 | Krenz et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7949295 | Kumar et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7965868 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8046719 | Skourup et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8059342 | Burke | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8320217 | Barger et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8625200 | Smith et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8678282 | Black et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8766879 | Fujikawa | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781794 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8884845 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8928558 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8964298 | Haddick et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9384594 | Maciocci et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9551873 | Zalewski | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20010033401 | Kasai et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043163 | Waldern et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020036649 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020047987 | Massengill et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020094189 | Navab et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020163486 | Ronzani et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181115 | Massof et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186179 | Knowles | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196554 | Cobb et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030184868 | Geist | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040008157 | Brubaker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040070839 | Yagi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040130783 | Solomon | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174599 | Dietrich | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050046953 | Repetto et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060072215 | Nishi | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060103590 | Divon | May 2006 | A1 |
20060227067 | Iwasaki | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060281061 | Hightower et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070020587 | Seymore et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070097277 | Hong et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132785 | Ebersole, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070177275 | McGuire, Jr. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219760 | Yang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236800 | Cakmakci et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242131 | Sanz-Pastor et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243916 | Lee | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248283 | Mack et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070273983 | Hebert | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007181 | Pickering | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080063400 | Hudson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071559 | Arrasvuori | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080123049 | Volk | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130309 | Condon et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080198459 | Fergason | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204731 | Williams | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080309586 | Vitale | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002574 | Sorek et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015735 | Simmonds | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040308 | Temovskiy | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090112469 | Lapidot et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122385 | Hilton | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153437 | Aharoni | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090173788 | Moraites et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174589 | Moraites | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190003 | Park et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228251 | Cakmakci et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238378 | Kikinis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100002154 | Hua | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018285 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020643 | Barger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100060551 | Sugiyama et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100103075 | Kalaboukis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103196 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100149073 | Chaum | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165430 | Buschbeck | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171680 | Lapidot et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175685 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100214635 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238161 | Varga et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245387 | Bachelder et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254001 | Jang | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277575 | Ismael et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100279255 | Williams, II | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321409 | Komori et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018903 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110057863 | Sugihara et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110130636 | Daniel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110202306 | Eng et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213664 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214082 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216060 | Weising et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221656 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221657 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221658 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221659 | King, III et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221668 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221669 | Shams et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221670 | King, III et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221671 | King, III et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221672 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221793 | King, III et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221896 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221897 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222745 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225536 | Shams et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227812 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227813 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227820 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228403 | Masuda et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231757 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110250962 | Feiner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283865 | Collins | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289810 | D'Souza et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120050144 | Morlock | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068913 | Bar-Zeev et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120120498 | Harrison et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120499 | Harrison et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123742 | Harrison et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120154920 | Harrison | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120204307 | De Mattei et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212400 | Border et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242695 | Martin | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120274775 | Reiffel | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326948 | Crocco et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130016123 | Skarulis | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021224 | Fujikawa | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130163090 | Yu | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140002677 | Schinker | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140104274 | Hilliges et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140152531 | Murray et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140182659 | Davis et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140266987 | Magyari | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150103152 | Qin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150177516 | Blonde et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178992 | Bhuruth | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150260474 | Rublowsky et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160187969 | Larsen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2750287 | Nov 2011 | CA |
2750287 | Nov 2011 | CA |
103261944 | Aug 2013 | CN |
102007009828 | Sep 2008 | DE |
1418458 | Dec 2004 | EP |
2624238 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2461907 | Jan 2010 | GB |
55-164801 | Dec 1980 | JP |
02-032301 | Feb 1990 | JP |
05-303054 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H07134266 | May 1995 | JP |
H07225790 | Aug 1995 | JP |
H07244246 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H08190072 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08-278476 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-080575 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-206786 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000047138 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2002287077 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2006039359 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006091477 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2008058461 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008529064 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009069364 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009232133 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010019874 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010020065 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010517090 | May 2010 | JP |
2011133633 | Jul 2011 | JP |
10-0292015 | Mar 2001 | KR |
I244318 | Nov 2005 | TW |
201326895 | Jul 2013 | TW |
9722964 | Jun 1997 | WO |
2005017729 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2008051578 | May 2008 | WO |
2009066408 | May 2009 | WO |
2009094643 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010047212 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010123934 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011114149 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012052980 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012052981 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012083042 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 11 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Oct. 10, 2015, 9 pages. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11806088.8, dated Oct. 27, 2015, 3 pages. |
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2013-544784, dated Aug. 17, 2015, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Sep. 21, 2015, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated May 21, 2015, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Oct. 8, 2015, 15 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Jan. 4, 2016, 3 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 15 pages. |
Unknown, “Optical head-mounted display,” Wikipedia, last modified Feb. 25, 2016, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_head-mounted_display, 18 pages. |
Hua, Hong, “Past and future of wearable augmented reality displays and their applications,” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 9186, Oct. 20, 2014, SPIE, pp. 91860O-1 to 91860O-12. |
Olwal, Alex, et al., “Astor: An Autostereoscopic Optical See-through Augmented Reality System,” Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 5-8, 2005, Vienna, Austria, IEEE, pp. 24-27. |
Rolland, Jannick, P., “Wide-angle, off-axis, see-through head-mounted display,” Optical Engineering, vol. 39, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2000, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, pp. 1760-1767. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815631.4, dated Apr. 13, 2016, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Search Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 100148681, dated Mar. 14, 2016, 12 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Jul. 11, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/055918, dated Jan. 27, 2016, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Jun. 2, 2016, 18 pages. |
Amery, John G., et al., “Flight Simulation Visual Requirements and a New Display System,” Cockpit Displays VI: Displays for Defense Applications, Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 3690, Aug. 16, 1999, 16 pages. |
Author Unknown, “ABI Research Anticipates ‘Dramatic Growth’ for Augmented Reality via Smartphones,” Human-Machine Technology Research Service, ABI Research, Oct. 22, 2009, 1 page. |
Author Unknown, “VST-2200FL Flight Simulator,” Virtual SimTech, 2013, http://www.virtualsimtech.com/flightsimulators.htm, 2 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Head Mounted Displays from INITION,” Retrieved from http://www.inition.co.uk/3D-Technologies/productsection/31, Accessed on Dec. 30, 2011, 4 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Immersive Displays: Powerwall, CAVE, Headmounted Displays (HMD),” InterSense Applications, Downloaded at http://www.intersense.com/categories/11/, Accessed on Mar. 7, 2011, InterSense Incorporated, 3 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Lumus—Consumer Market Products,” Retrieved from http://www.lumus-optical.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9&1temid=15, Accessed on Dec. 30, 2011, Lumus Ltd., 4 pages. |
Author Unknown, “SEOS Ultra Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Display,” SEOS HMD 120/40, Product Specifications, Retrieved from http://cgsd.com/SEOSHMD/, Accessed on Oct. 31, 2013, SEOS Displays Ltd., 3 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Vuzix High Resolution Video Eyewear: The Future of Big Screen Viewing on the Go!,” Vuzix Products, Retrieved from http://www.vuzix.com/consumer, Retrieved Dec. 30, 2011, Vuzix, 2 pages. |
Ayras et al., “Near-To-Eye Display Based on Retinal Scanning and a Diffractive Exitpupil Expander,” Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Apr. 12-15, 2010, vol. 7723, No. 77230V, SPIE, 8 pages. |
Azuma et al., “Improving Static and Dynamic Registration in an Optical See-through HMD,” Computer Graphics: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1994, Annual Conference Series, Orlando, Florida, Jul. 24-29, 1994, pp. 197-204. |
Bayer et al., “Chapter 3: Introduction to Helmet-Mounted Displays,” Excerpt from Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognition Issues, U.S. Army Medical Department, Medical Research and Material command, USAARL, 2009, 65 pages. |
Billinghurst et al., “Collaboration with Tangible Augmented Reality Interfaces,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Aug. 2001, vol. 1, 5 pages. |
Cakmakci et al., “Meshfree Approximation Methods for Free-Form Surface Representation in Optical Design With Applications to Head-Worn Displays,” Proceedings of the SPIE, Aug. 2008, vol. 7061, SPIE, 15 pages. |
Cakmakci et al., “Optical Free-Form Surfaces in Off-Axis Head-Worn Display Design,” Mixed and Augmented Reality, 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium, Mar. 2008, pp. 29-32. |
Dejong, C. Dean, “Full-Color, See-Through, Daylight-Readable, Goggle-Mounted Display,” Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Apr. 28, 2011, vol. 8041, SPIE, 13 pages. |
Feiner, Steven, et al., “MARS—Mobile Augmented Reality Systems,” Columbia University, Computer Graphics and User Interfaces Lab, Downloaded at http://graphics.cs.columbia.edu/projects/mars/, Accessed on Mar. 7, 2011, 4 pages. |
Ferscha et al., “Wearable Displays—for Everyone!”, Pervasive Computing, Jan. -Mar. 2010, vol. 9, No. 1, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 7-10. |
Haun, Bzur, “Gartner: Mobility market will reach $1 trillion by 2014,” Mobility Management News and Blogs, Visage Mobile, Oct. 21, 2010, 2 pages. |
Hastings, A., “Eye Box Performance Parameters for Non Pupil Forming. Head/Helmet Mounted Displays,” Tutorial, Opt 521, Dec. 6, 2006, www.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/ . . . /tutorials/HastingsTutorial1.doc, 6 pages. |
Henderson, Steve, et al., “Augmented Reality for Maintenance and Repair (ARMAR),” Columbia University, Computer Graphics and User Interfaces Lab, Downloaded at http://graphics.cs.columbia.edu/projects/armar/, Jul. 2007, 4 pages. |
Holden, Windsor, “A New Reality for Mobile,” Whitepaper, Juniper Research Limited, Feb. 2011, 5 pages. |
Hopkins et al., “Simple Thin Lens Optical Systems,” US Department of Defense, Military Standardization Handbook: Optical Design, MIL-HDBK-141, Oct. 5, 1962, FSC-6650, Section 7, http://www.optics.arizona.edu/opti510I/references/mil-hdbk-141 /ch7_12.pdf, 20 pages. |
Jeon et al., “Mosaicing a Wide Geometric Field of View for Effective Interaction in Augmented Reality,” Mixed and Augmented Reality, 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium, Mar. 2007, pp. 265-266. |
Kato et al., “Marker Tracking and HMD Calibration for a Video-based Augmented Reality Conferencing System,” Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality, Oct. 1999, San Francisco, California, 10 pages. |
Kato et al., “Virtual Object Manipulation on a Table-Top AR Environment,” 2000, 9 pages. |
Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi, “A Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Projective Display Using Hyperbolic Half-Silvered Mirrors,” IEEE, Nov. 16, 2007, Cybermedia Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. |
Klepper, Sebastian, “Augmented Reality—Display Systems,” Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany, Jul. 4, 2007, http://campar.in.tum.de/twiki/pub/Chair/TeachingSs07 ArProseminar/1_Display- Systems_Klepper_Report.pdf. |
Kurze et al., “Smart Glasses: An Open Environment for AR Apps,” 2010 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Science & Technology Papers, Oct. 13-16, 2010, Seoul, South Korea, p. 313. |
Lingley et al., “A Single-Pixel Wireless Contact Lens Display,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 21 (2011) 125014 (8pp); doi:1 0.1 088/0960-1317/21/12/125014; Nov. 22, 2011, Received Jun. 9, 2011, in final form Sep. 19, 2011. |
Liu et al., “An Optical See-Through Head Mounted Display with Addressable Focal Planes,” IEEE Int'l Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Sep. 15-18, 2008, Cambridge, UK. |
Livingston et al., “An Augmented Reality System for Military Operations in Urban Terrain,” Proc of I/ITSEC '02, Orlando, FL, Dec. 2-5, 2002. |
McClernon, Chris et al., “PC-Based Desktop Display versus Immersive Head-Mounted Display Flight Simulator Performance,” Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Dec. 2006, http://www.iitsecdocs.com, 7 pages. |
Melzer et al., “Guidelines for HMD Design,” in Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognition Issues, C. E. Rash et al., ed., U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, 2009, Chapter 17, http://www.usaarl.army.mil/publications/hmd_book09/files/Section%2026%20-%20Chapter17%20Guidelines%20for%20HMD%20design.pdf. |
Melzer, James E., “Head-Mounted Displays,” The Avionics Handbook, Cary R. Spitzer, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida, 2001, Chapter 5, http://www.davi.ws/avionics/TheAvionicsHandbook_Cap_5_pdf. |
Mori et al., “A Wide-View Parallax-Free Eye-Mark Recorder with a Hyperboloidal Half-Silvered Mirror and Appearance-Based Gaze Estimation,” Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions, Aug. 26, 2010, p. 1, vol. PP, No. 99. |
Mukawa et al., “A Full Color Eyewear Display Using Holographic Planar Waveguides,” IDW'08—Proceedings of the 15th International Display Workshops, Dec. 3-5, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 259-262, Inst. of Image Information and Television Engineers. |
Mukawa et al., “A Full-Color Eyewear Display Using Planar Waveguides with Reflection Volume Holograms,” Journal of the Society for Information Display, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 185-193, Mar. 2009, Society for Information Display. |
Nagahara et al., “Super Wide Viewer Using Catadioptric Optics,” Proc. ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST2003), Oct. 2003, pp. 169-175, Osaka, Japan. |
Nagahara et al., “Wide Field of View Catadioptrical Head-Mounted Display,” Proc. of 2003 IEEE/RSJ, Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas NV, Oct. 2003, pp. 3738-3743. |
Nagahara et al., “Wide Field of View Head Mounted Display for Tele-Presence with an Omnidirectional Image Sensor,” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Jun. 16-22, 2003, vol. 7, 6 pages. |
Okuma et al., “An Augmented Reality System Using a Real-Time Vision Based Registration,” Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Aug. 16-20, 1998, p. 1226, vol. 2. |
Parviz, Babak A., “Augmented Reality in a Contact Lens,” IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 2009, http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/bionics/augmented-reality-in-a-contact-lens/0. |
Perey, Christine, et al., “Where's the Money? Mobile AR Revenue Streams,” Mobile AR Summit Position Paper, Downloaded at http://www.perey.com/MobileARSummit/Perey-Mobile%20AR-Revenue-Streams.pdf, Feb. 9, 2010, 4 pages. |
Pratt, P. D., “Advanced Helmet Sight Reticle Assembly (AHRA),” Jul. 1976, p. 364, Honeywell Inc., Minneapolis Minn. Systems and Research Div. |
Rolland et al., “Development of Head-Mounted Projection Displays for Distributed, Collaborative, Augmented Reality Applications,” Oct. 2005, Presence, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 528-549. |
Rolland et al., “Invited Paper: Head-Worn Displays—Lens Design,” 48th Annual SID Symposium, Seminar, and Exhibition 2010, Display Week 2010, May 23-28, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 855-858, Society for Information Display. |
Rose, Melinda, “Microdisplays: Coming Soon to an Eye Near You?”, Photonics Spectra, Sep. 2008, vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 68-69, Laurin Publishing Co. Inc. |
Schonlau et al., “Personal Viewer: A Wide-Field Low-Profile See-Through Eyewear Display,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Apr. 14-16, 2004, vol. 5443, No. 1, pp. 277-287, Orlando, FL, SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. |
Schwald et al., “An Augmented Reality System for Training and Assistance to Maintenance in the Industrial Context,” Journal of WSCG, Feb. 3-7, 2003, vol. 11, No. 1, Plzen, Czech Republic. |
Spitzer et al., “Video I/0 Interface for Wearable Computers,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 3689, pp. 278-283, 1999, Conference: Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays IV, Apr. 5-6, 1999, Orlando, FL, SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA. |
Takeda et al., “Design and Implementation of a Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Projective Display,” Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Jun. 2009, pp. 794-800, vol. 63, No. 6, Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Osaka, Japan. |
Takeda et al., “Poster: A Virtual Walkthrough System with a Wide Field-of-View Stereo Head Mounted Projective Display,” 3D User Interfaces, IEEE Symposium, Mar. 14-15, 2009, p. 149, Lafayette, LA. |
Upton et al., “Eyeglass Head-Up Display [Vibrating Fiber Optic Assembly,” 1981 SID International Symposium, Digest of Papers, Apr. 28-30, 1981, vol. XII, pp. 48-49, New York, NY, SID, Los Angeles, CA. |
Vanden Brook, T., “Device Helps Pinpoint Snipers: Technology is Critical for U.S. Combat Troops,” USA Today, Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2011. |
Von Waldkirch et al., “Spectacle-Based Design of Wearable See-Through Display for Accommodation-Free Viewing,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing, (Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. vol. 3001 ), Apr. 18-23, 2004, pp. 106-123, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. |
Wang, Robert Y. et al., “Real-time hand-tracking with a color glove,” retrieved Dec. 16, 2014 from http://people.csail.mit.edu/rywang/hand/, 3 pages. |
Yang et al., “Hybrid Diffractive-Refractive 67 degree-Diagonal Field of View Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display,” Institute of Modern Optics, Aug. 17, 2005, pp. 351-355, vol. 116, No. 7, Optik-Internat, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. |
Yavrucuk, I. et al., “A Low Cost Flight Simulator Using Virtual Reality Tools,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Systems Magazine, vol. 26, Issue 4, Apr. 2011, IEEE, pp. 10-14. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2011/055824 dated May 16, 2012, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/IB2011/055824 dated May 2, 2013, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2011/055824 dated May 2, 2013, 7 pages. |
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011319480 dated Oct. 27, 2014, 3 pages. |
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011319481 dated Oct. 23, 2014, 3 pages. |
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011343660 dated Oct. 31, 2014, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2011/055820 dated May 21, 2012, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/065201 dated Mar. 7, 2012, 14 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/065201 dated Jun. 27, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2011/055826 dated Sep. 14, 2012, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2011/055826 dated May 2, 2013, 11 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060659.0, dated Nov. 3, 2014, 10 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060662.2, dated Nov. 2, 2014, 13 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Oct. 24, 2012, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Feb. 22, 2013, 15 pages. |
Non-final Office Action and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Jun. 14, 2013, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Oct. 18, 2013, 22 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Apr. 22, 2014, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Aug. 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 20 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Nov. 21, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Mar. 7, 2013, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Aug. 1, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Sep. 6, 2013, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Feb. 26, 2013, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Jul. 12, 2013, 25 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Sep. 19, 2013, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Jan. 6, 2014, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217 dated Jan. 17, 2014, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217 dated Jul. 31, 2014, 13 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217 dated Nov. 5, 2014, 3 pages. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/006722, dated Dec. 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815630.6, dated Nov. 20, 2015, 4 pages. |
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534453, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 9 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 2 for Australian Patent Application No. 2011343660, dated Oct. 22, 2015, 3 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2011319481, dated Oct. 12, 2015, 3 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060659.0, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 6 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060659.0, dated Dec. 15, 2015, 6 pages. |
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2013-534454, dated Sep. 17, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 100148694, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060662.2, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 100148681, dated Oct. 5, 2015, 15 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Nov. 7, 2016, 3 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Nov. 23, 2016, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Nov. 30, 2016, 24 pages. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/004453, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 3 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2015249168, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 2 pages. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/004454, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 3 pages. |
Decision of Rejection for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Oct. 17, 2016, 14 pages. |
Debevec, Paul, et al., “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compositing,” Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), Jul. 21-26, 2002, San Antonio, Texas, ACM, pp. 1-10. |
Waese, Jamie, “SIGGRAPH paper: Infrared Chroma Key,” waese.com/infrared-chroma-key/, 2015, Jamie Waese, pp. 1-3. |
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534453, dated Jul. 26, 2016, 5 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2015249168, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 3 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534454, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 13 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544784, dated May 31, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,509, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/020444, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,607, dated Mar. 20, 2014, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,607, dated Oct. 9, 2014, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,780 dated Jan. 30, 2013, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,780, dated Aug. 15, 2013, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,780, dated Nov. 8, 2013, 15 pages. |
Second Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/004453, dated Jan. 19, 2017, 6 pages. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11806088.8, dated Dec. 7, 2016, 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/057731, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2011/055820, dated May 2, 2013, 8 pages. |
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534454, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 11 pages. |
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544784, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Mar. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated May 23, 2017, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/055918, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated Sep. 13, 2017, 16 pages. |
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534454, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 6 pages. |
Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 10 pages. |
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544784, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/020444, dated Sep. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jul. 3, 2017, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Jun. 26, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/142,380, dated Jun. 27, 2017, 19 pages. |
Notification of Reason for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-229136, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 5 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,815,461, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,821,401, dated Oct. 17, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-701735, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 10 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,815,452, dated Oct. 31, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013039, dated Dec. 18, 2017, 9 pages. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815630.6, dated Dec. 13, 2017, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 8 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated Dec. 7, 2017, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/142,380, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 27 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Dec. 22, 2017, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/142,380, dated Feb. 7, 2018, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,800, dated Apr. 4, 2018, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 23 pages. |
Decision of Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Feb. 11, 2018, 23 pages. |
First Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013038, dated Mar. 5, 2018, 9 pages. |
Preliminary Office Action for Brazilian Patent Application No. 112013009856-2, dated Oct. 15, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 104134259, dated Jan. 16, 2019, 9 pages. |
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Feb. 5, 2019, 5 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Jan. 22, 2019, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 7 pages. |
Advisory Action, Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary, and AFCP 2.0 Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,800, dated Mar. 19, 2019, 5 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Oct. 25, 2019, 5 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Aug. 13, 2019, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,800, dated Aug. 9, 2019, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 8 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Apr. 17, 2019, 5 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated May 20, 2019, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 16858143.7, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160109710 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62065328 | Oct 2014 | US |