This application is the U.S. National Stage of PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US2017/058620, filed Oct. 26, 2017.
The present disclosure relates generally to implantable cochlear stimulation (or “ICS”) systems.
ICS systems are used to help the profoundly deaf perceive a sensation of sound by directly exciting the intact auditory nerve with controlled impulses of electrical current. Ambient sound pressure waves are picked up by an externally worn microphone and converted to electrical signals. The electrical signals, in turn, are processed by a sound processor, converted to a pulse sequence having varying pulse widths, rates, and/or amplitudes, and transmitted to an implanted receiver circuit of the ICS system. The implanted receiver circuit is connected to an implantable electrode array that has been inserted into the cochlea of the inner ear, and electrical stimulation current is applied to varying electrode combinations to create a perception of sound. The electrode array may, alternatively, be directly inserted into the cochlear nerve without residing in the cochlea. A representative ICS system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,022, which is entitled “Cochlear Stimulation System Employing Behind-The-Ear Sound processor With Remote Control” and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Examples of commercially available ICS sound processors include, but are not limited to, the Harmony™ BTE sound processor, the Naida™ CI Q Series sound processor and the Neptune™ body worn sound processor, which are available from Advanced Bionics.
As alluded to above, some ICS systems include an implantable cochlear stimulator (or “cochlear implant”), a sound processor unit (e.g., a body worn processor or behind-the-ear processor), and a microphone that is part of, or is in communication with, the sound processor unit. The cochlear implant communicates with the sound processor unit and, some ICS systems include a headpiece that is in communication with both the sound processor unit and the cochlear implant. The headpiece communicates with the cochlear implant by way of a transmitter (e.g., an antenna) on the headpiece and a receiver (e.g., an antenna) on the implant. The headpiece and the cochlear implant may include respective magnets (or respective pluralities of magnets) that are attracted to one another, thereby retaining the headpiece on the head and maintaining the position of the headpiece transmitter on the head over the implant receiver. The skin and subcutaneous tissue that separates the headpiece magnet and implant magnet is sometimes referred to as the “skin flap.”
One example of a conventional headpiece is the headpiece 10 illustrated in
The proper retention of the headpiece 10 on the skull and over the cochlear implant 30 depends on the normal retention force NRF and the lateral retention force LRF. The normal retention force NRF is a function of the strength of the headpiece and implant magnets 18 and 30 as well as the thickness of the skin flap and hair (if any), while the lateral retention force LRF is a function of the normal retention force NRF and the coefficient of friction between the headpiece and the associated head surface. Pressure on the skin flap can result in discomfort and tissue necrosis when the normal retention force NRF is too high, while the headpiece will not be retained when the normal retention force NRF is too low.
Certain headpieces, including the headpiece illustrated in
Other headpieces are provided with magnet systems that include a plurality of magnets of different strengths that can be individually mounted, i.e., mounted only one at a time, within the associated headpiece. Such magnets sometimes have locking features that mate with the headpiece in response to, for example, rotation of the magnet relative to the headpiece. The present inventors have determined that the manner in which the magnets are connected to the associated headpiece is somewhat limiting, and that different methods of connecting the magnets would result in a greater number of magnetic strength options with the same number of magnets.
Still other issues identified by the present inventors relate to the use of diametrically magnetized magnets in cochlear implants. For example, were one to stack a plurality of diametrically magnetized magnets within a receptacle in a manner similar to the magnets 22 in
A cochlear implant headpiece in accordance with one of the present inventions includes a housing including a bottom wall and a magnet receptacle and defining an axis that extends through the magnet receptacle in a direction perpendicular to the bottom wall, the magnet receptacle defining a non-circular shape in a plane perpendicular to the axis, a headpiece magnet, defining the non-circular shape in a plane perpendicular to the axis, removably located within the magnet receptacle, and a headpiece antenna carried by the housing. The present inventions also include cochlear stimulation systems with a sound processor and/or a cochlear implant in combination with such a headpiece.
A cochlear implant headpiece in accordance with one of the present inventions includes a housing including a bottom wall and a magnet receptacle, a headpiece magnet, including a magnetic member and a compressible non-magnetic member permanently secured to the magnetic member, removably located within the magnet receptacle, and a headpiece antenna carried by the housing. The present inventions also include cochlear stimulation systems with a sound processor and/or a cochlear implant in combination with such a headpiece.
A magnet kit in accordance with one of the present inventions includes a first magnet apparatus having a first magnetic strength and including a first magnetic member defining a N-S magnetization direction and a cruciform shape in a plane parallel to the N-S magnetization direction, and a second magnet apparatus having a second magnetic strength, which is greater than the first magnetic strength, and including a second magnetic member defining a N-S magnetization direction and a cruciform shape in a plane parallel to the N-S magnetization direction.
A magnet kit in accordance with one of the present inventions includes a first magnet apparatus having a first magnetic strength and including a first magnetic member and a first compressible non-magnetic member permanently secured to the first magnetic member, and a second magnet apparatus having a second magnetic strength, which is greater than the first magnetic strength, and including a second magnetic member and a second compressible non-magnetic member permanently secured to the second magnetic member.
There are a variety of advantages associated with such headpieces, systems and kits. By way of example, but not limitation, some or all of the present inventions decrease the likelihood that a stronger similarly sized magnets may be employed in place of (or stacked along with) the intended magnets, increase the number of magnetic strength options associated with a given number of magnets within a magnet set, are well suited for use with diametrically magnetized cochlear implant magnets, and are well suited for persons who do no wear their headpiece in the typical manner relative to the gravitational direction.
The above described and many other features of the present inventions will become apparent as the inventions become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Detailed descriptions of the exemplary embodiments will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The following is a detailed description of the best presently known modes of carrying out the inventions. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the inventions.
An exemplary headpiece in accordance with at least one of the present inventions is illustrated in
The internal volume of the exemplary housing 102 includes a microphone 116 and a printed circuit board (PCB) 118 which carries the microphone and various other headpiece electronic components on one side. The other side of the PCB 118 includes an antenna 120 within an annular protective covering 122 (
In the illustrated implementation, the housing main portion 104 includes a plurality of walls 136 that define the sides of the receptacle 112. The housing cover 106 includes a bottom wall 138, which forms the bottom of the receptacle 112, and an annular indentation 140 for the antenna's protective covering 122. The bottom (or “exterior”) surface of the bottom wall 138 may be concave or flat, and may include a plurality of protrusions 142. The housing 102 and cap 108 may be attached to one another with any suitable instrumentalities. In the illustrated implementation, the housing main portion 104 includes a plurality of latch indentations 144 that are engaged by a corresponding plurality of latches 146 on the cap 108 when the cap is positioned over the housing 102 in the manner illustrated in
As illustrated in
Turning to
There are a variety of ways to vary the strength from one magnet to another in a magnet system, such as magnet system 110, where the magnets are the same overall size and shape. For example, the magnets 110-1 to 110-4 may be formed from materials with different magnetic strengths. Alternatively, or in addition, portions of the three weaker magnets may be removed (e.g., by drilling differently sized holes through the magnets). In the illustrated implementation, all but one of the magnets is a two-part structure that includes a respective magnetic member 152-1 to 152-3 and a respective non-magnetic member 154-1 to 154-3. In the illustrated implementation, the magnetic and non-magnetic members have the same non-circular shape (e.g., cruciform shape) in respective planes perpendicular to the axis A. The magnet 110-4 is formed entirely from magnetic material and, accordingly, consists solely of a magnetic member 152-4. The strength of the magnets 110-1 to 110-3 may be varied by varying the relative thicknesses of the magnetic members 152-1 to 152-3 and non-magnetic member 154-1 to 154-3. For example, the magnetic strength of the magnet 110-2 is greater than the magnet 110-1. Although the overall thickness TM of the magnets 110-1 and 110-2 is the same, the thickness of the magnetic member 152-2 is greater than the thickness of the magnetic member 152-1, while the thickness of the non-magnetic member 154-2 is less than the thickness of the magnetic member 152-1.
In the illustrated embodiment, the magnetic members 152-1 to 152-3 are permanently secured to the non-magnetic member 154-1 to 154-3 through the use of adhesive or other suitable instrumentalities. As used here, the phrase “permanently secured” means that, once connected, the magnetic members will remain attached to the non-magnetic members under normal use conditions, and cannot be separated from one another without destruction of the magnetic members, the non-magnetic members and/or the instrumentality that secures the two to one another. Suitable materials for the magnetic members include, but are not limited to neodymium, while suitable materials for the non-magnetic members include, but are not limited to, plastics and other relatively rigid and lightweight materials.
The N-S magnetization direction of the magnetic members 154-1 to 154-4 will depend on the intended application. In those instances where the cochlear implant includes an axially magnetized positioning magnet, the N-S magnetization direction of the magnetic members 154-1 to 154-4 may be in the thickness direction that aligns with the axis A (
In at least some implementations, the magnets within a magnet system may include visible and/or tactile indicia that identify the relative magnet strength and/or the N-S magnetization direction of the magnet. For example, the exemplary magnets 110-1 to 110-4 may include indicia that in the form of numbers on the top surfaces (in the illustrated orientation) of the non-magnetic members 154-1 to 154-3 that are representative of the relative magnet strengths, i.e., “1” being lowest and “4” being highest. Alternatively, or in addition, the non-magnetic members 154-1 to 154-3 may be different colors, with each color corresponding to a relative magnetic strength. The exemplary magnets 110-1 to 110-4 also include “N-S” indicia on the bottom surfaces of the magnetic members 152-1 to 152-4 and the top surfaces non-magnetic members 154-1 to 154-4.
There are a variety of advantages associated with the exemplary headpiece 100 and magnet system 110. For example, and as illustrated in
The present headpieces may also be used in conjunction with cochlear implants that include a magnet apparatus which has a plurality of diametrically magnetized magnets as well as a N-S magnetization direction that rotates into alignment with the associated headpiece magnet. To that end, and referring to
There are four elongate diametrically magnetized magnets 60 in the exemplary magnet apparatus 36″. Two of the otherwise identical magnets 60 are relatively long and two are relatively short in order to efficiently utilize the available volume within the case 52. As such, the magnets 60 together define a cruciform shape similar to headpiece magnet 110-1. The exemplary magnets 60 are circular in a cross-section, have rounded corners 62, and are located within low friction tubes 64. The exemplary magnet frame 58 includes a disk 66 and a magnet receptacle 68 that extends completely through the disk. The magnet receptacle 68 is configured to hold all of the magnets 60 (four in the illustrated embodiment) and includes a relatively long portion and two relatively short portions. The inner surfaces of the case 52 and/or the surfaces of the frame 58 may be coated with a lubricious layer.
Given the ability of each magnet 60 of the apparatus 36″ illustrated in
Turning to
The cruciform shape of the present magnets 110-1 to 110-4 may also be used to provide a more volumetrically efficient headpiece, as compared to headpieces that employ disk-shaped magnets with circular cross-sections. In particular, relatively tall components on the PCB 118 (such as the microphone 116) may be positioned closer to the center of the headpiece, which facilitates the use of thinner housings.
The present inventions are not limited to the exemplary magnet configuration illustrated in
The magnet 110a-1 may be part of a magnet system that includes a plurality of similar-shaped magnets having different magnetic strengths. To that end, and referring to
In the exemplary implementation, the magnetic members 152a-1 to 152a-4 each have a cruciform shape that is similar to that of receptacle 112 and define the length LM and width WM of the respective magnets 110a-1 to 110a-4, which is the same from magnet to magnet. The thickness TM of the magnets 110a-1 to 110a-3 is equal to the combined thicknesses of the magnetic members 152a-1 to 152a-3 and the posts 154a-1 to 154a-3, while the thickness of magnet 110a-4 is simply the thickness of the magnetic member 152a-4. Although the length LM and width WM are the same in the illustrated embodiment, they may be different in other embodiments. The length LM and width WM of the magnets 110a-1 to 110a-4 may be identical to, or are at least substantially identical to (i.e., up to 3% less than), the length LR and width WR of the receptacle 112. The thickness TM may be at least 90% of the receptacle depth DR and, in the illustrated implementation, is at least substantially identical to depth DR (i.e., ±5%). As such, the free end of the posts 154a-1 to 154a-3 will be aligned with the receptacle top end 148, as will one end of the magnetic member 152a-4, when a magnet 110a-1 to 110a-4 is located within the receptacle 112, thereby preventing insertion of additional magnets. In those instances where the magnet thickness TM is greater than the receptacle depth DR (up to 10% greater), the inner surface of the cap 108 may have a small recess (not shown) that can accommodate the portion of the magnet that extends beyond the receptacle 112.
The strength of the magnets 110a-1 to 110a-4 may be varied by varying the relative thicknesses of the magnetic members 152a-1 to 152a-4 and posts 154a-1 to 154a-3 (including the lack of a post). For example, the magnetic strength of the magnet 110a-2 is greater than the magnet 110a-1. Although the overall thickness TM of the magnets 110a-1 and 110a-2 is the same, the thickness of the magnetic member 152a-2 is greater than the thickness of the magnetic member 152a-1, while the thickness of the post 154a-2 is less than the thickness of the post 152a-1.
The length of the posts 154a-1 to 154a-3 (as well as the lack thereof) also functions as indicia which identifies the relative strengths of the magnets 110a-1 to 110a-4. The longest post is indicative of the weakest magnet (i.e., magnet 110a-1) and the lack of a post is indicative of the strongest magnet (i.e., magnet 110a-4). Other types of strength representative indicia (e.g., numbers or color) may also be employed. Indicia indicative of the N-S magnetization direction (
Here too, due to their respective configurations, the number of magnetic strength options provided by the exemplary headpiece 100a and magnet system 110a is greater than the number of magnets in the system. The magnets 110a-1 to 110a-3, each of which has a different strength, may be inserted with the magnetic member 152a-1 to 152a-3 facing the implant magnet 36′ (e.g., magnetic member 152a-1 in
Another exemplary headpiece is generally represented by reference numeral 100b in
The internal volume of the exemplary housing 102b includes a microphone 116 and a printed circuit board (PCB) 118b which carries the microphone and various other headpiece electronic components on one other side. The other side of the PCB 118b includes an antenna 120 within an annular protective covering 122 (
In the illustrated implementation, the housing main portion 104b and cover 106b include respective annular walls 136b and 137b that together define the receptacle 112b. The housing cover 106b also includes a bottom wall 138b, which forms the bottom of the receptacle 112b, and an annular indentation 140 for the antenna's protective covering 122. The bottom surface of the bottom wall 138 may be concave or flat, and may include a plurality of protrusions 142. The housing 102b and cap 108b may be attached to one another with any suitable instrumentality. In the illustrated implementation, the housing main portion 104b also includes a plurality of latch indentations 144 that are engaged by a corresponding plurality of latches 146 on the cap 108b when the cap is positioned over the housing 102 in the manner illustrated in
Referring to
The exemplary magnet 110b-2 also includes indicia 160b that may be used to indicate the N-S direction of the associated diametrically magnetized magnetic member 152b-2 as well as the strength of the magnet relative to other magnets in the associated magnet system, as is described below with reference to
Turning to
The respective uncompressed thicknesses TMU (
In the illustrated implementation, the number of chevrons 160a identifies the relative strengths of the magnets 110b-1 to 110b-4. A single chevron 160b is indicative of the weakest magnet (i.e., magnet 110b-1) and four chevrons are indicative of the strongest magnet (i.e., magnet 110b-4). Alternatively, or in addition, other types of strength representative indicia (e.g., numbers or color) may also be employed. The chevrons 160a (or other indicia) may also be provided on the top and bottom surfaces of the magnets 110b-1 to 110-4. The chevrons 160b or other indicia may, for example, be provided on adhesive labels 162b (as shown) or formed directly on the associated surfaces.
As described above in the context of magnet systems 110 and 110a, the number of magnetic strength options provided by the exemplary headpiece 100b and magnet system 110b is greater than the number of magnets in the system. The magnets 110b-1 to 110b-4, each of which has a different strength, may be inserted with the magnetic member 152b-1 to 152b-4 facing the implant magnet 36′ (e.g., magnetic member 152b-2 in
As noted above, the present magnet systems are not limited to any particular type of indicia. By way of example, but not limitation, the indicia may be in the form of elongate rectangles 160c (
The present inventions also include tools that are configured to insert the above-described magnets into their associated headpieces and to remove the magnets from the headpieces. One exemplary tool is generally represented by reference numeral 200 in
As illustrated for example in
With respect to exemplary ICS systems that include the present headpieces, the exemplary ICS system 80 illustrated in
The exemplary sound processor 300 is a body worn sound processor that includes a housing 302 in which and/or on which various components are supported. Such components may include, but are not limited to, sound processor circuitry 304, a headpiece port 306 that may be connected to the headpiece 100 by a cable 307, an auxiliary device port 308 for an auxiliary device such as a mobile phone or a music player, a control panel 310, one or more microphones 312, and a power supply receptacle 314 for a removable battery or other removable power supply 316 (e.g., rechargeable and disposable batteries or other electrochemical cells). The sound processor circuitry 304 converts electrical signals from the microphone 312 into stimulation data.
During use, one of the above-described headpiece magnets (e.g., 110-1) will be attracted to the implant magnet 36′, thereby aligning the headpiece antenna 120 with the implant antenna 34. The stimulation data and, in many instances power, is supplied to the headpiece 100, which transcutaneously transmits the stimulation data, and in many instances power, to the cochlear implant 30′ by way of a wireless link between the antennas. In at least some implementations, the cable 307 will be configured for forward telemetry and power signals at 49 MHz and back telemetry signals at 10.7 MHz. It should be noted that, in other implementations, communication between a sound processor and a headpiece and/or auxiliary device may be accomplished through wireless communication techniques. Additionally, given the presence of the microphone(s) 312 on the sound processor 300, the headpiece microphone 116 may be omitted in some instances.
It should be noted that the present magnets and magnet systems may be employed in ICS systems which are configured such that all of the components (e.g., the battery, the microphone, the sound processor, and the antenna coil) are carried within a single headpiece. One example of such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2010/0046778, which is entitled “Integrated Cochlear Implant Headpiece” and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Although the inventions disclosed herein have been described in terms of the preferred embodiments above, numerous modifications and/or additions to the above-described preferred embodiments would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art. The inventions also include any combination of the elements from the various species and embodiments disclosed in the specification that are not already described. It is intended that the scope of the present inventions extend to all such modifications and/or additions and that the scope of the present inventions is limited solely by the claims set forth below.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/058620 | 10/26/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/083540 | 5/2/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4214366 | Laban | Jul 1980 | A |
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4595390 | Hakim et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4606329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
4612915 | Hough et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4618949 | Lister | Oct 1986 | A |
RE32947 | Dormer et al. | Jun 1989 | E |
5290281 | Tschakaloff | Mar 1994 | A |
5755762 | Bush | May 1998 | A |
5824022 | Zilberman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5945762 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6032677 | Blechman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6178353 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190305 | Ball et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217508 | Ball et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227820 | Jarvik | May 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6348070 | Teissl et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358281 | Berrang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6461288 | Holcomb | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6599321 | Hyde, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6838963 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7091806 | Zimmerling et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7190247 | Zimmerling | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7266208 | Charvin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7566296 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7609061 | Hochmair | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7642887 | Zimmerling | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7680525 | Damadian | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7774069 | Olson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7856986 | Darley | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7881800 | Daly et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7976453 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8013699 | Zimmerling | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027735 | Tziviskos | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8118725 | Zimmerling et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8255058 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8340774 | Hochmair et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8634909 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8733494 | Leigh | May 2014 | B1 |
8734475 | Ekvall et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8744106 | Ball | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8758394 | Zimmerling et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8787608 | Van Himbeeck et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790409 | Van den Heuvel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8825171 | Thenuwara et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8891795 | Andersson | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8897475 | Ball et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
RE45701 | Zimmerling et al. | Sep 2015 | E |
9126010 | Shah et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9162054 | Dalton | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9227064 | Duftner | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9295425 | Ball | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9314625 | Kasic, II et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9352149 | Thenuwara et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
RE46057 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2016 | E |
9392382 | Nagl et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9420388 | Ball | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9549267 | Nagl et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9615181 | Nagl et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656065 | Tourrel et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9919154 | Lee | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9931501 | Smyth | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10300276 | Lee et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10463849 | Lee et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10532209 | Lee et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10646712 | Smith et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10646718 | Smith et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10806936 | Crawford et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10821279 | Lee et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11097095 | Smith et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11287495 | Smith et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20040012470 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059423 | Barnes et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063072 | Honkura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040210103 | Westerkull | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260362 | Darley | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001703 | Zimmerling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004629 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050062567 | Zimmerling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060015155 | Charvin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060116743 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060244560 | Zimmerling et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070053536 | Westerkull | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126540 | Zimmerling | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080097496 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103350 | Farone | May 2008 | A1 |
20080192968 | Ho et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195178 | Kuzma | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090048580 | Gibson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099403 | Zimmerling et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134721 | Zimmerling | May 2009 | A1 |
20090248155 | Parker | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287278 | Charvin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004716 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100046778 | Crawford et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046779 | Crawford et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110009925 | Leigh et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022120 | Ball et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110068885 | Fullerton et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110218605 | Cryer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224756 | Zimmerling et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110255731 | Ball | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264172 | Zimmerling et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120296155 | Ball | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130079749 | Overstreet et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130150657 | Leigh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184804 | Dalton | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130281764 | Bjorn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130343588 | Karunasiri | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012069 | Ball | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012070 | Nagl et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012071 | Nagl et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012349 | Zimmerling | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140121449 | Kasic et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121586 | Bertrand et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163692 | Van den Heuvel et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140336447 | Bjorn et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343626 | Thenuwara et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150025613 | Nyberg, II et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150073205 | Ball et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150087892 | Tourrel et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094521 | Neuman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100109 | Feldman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150112407 | Hartley et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150265842 | Ridker | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150320523 | Way et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150367126 | Smyth | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150382114 | Andersson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008596 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160023006 | Ridler | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160037273 | Gustafsson | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160144170 | Gibson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160205484 | Nagl et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213936 | Heerlein | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160310737 | Tourrel et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160361537 | Leigh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381473 | Gustafsson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381474 | Gustafsson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170050027 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170078808 | Kennes | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170156010 | Verma et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170239476 | Lee | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170347208 | Jurkiewicz | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180028818 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180056084 | Alam | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180110985 | Walter | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180110986 | Lee | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180133486 | Smith | May 2018 | A1 |
20180146308 | Leigh et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180160241 | Gustafsson | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180160242 | Sriskandarajah | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180185634 | Smyth | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180249262 | Santek | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180270591 | Kennes | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180296826 | Lee et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180303602 | Leigh | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180304078 | Crawford et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180369586 | Lee et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190015662 | Raje et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190046797 | Calixto et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190053908 | Cook et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190076649 | Lee | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190255316 | Lee et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190298417 | Barrett et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200114151 | Smith et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200230422 | Gibson et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200238088 | Smith et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200391023 | Lee et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210046311 | Brehm et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210106815 | Smith et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210156934 | Smith et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210299456 | Smith et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210316136 | Smith et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210339021 | Brehm et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202006017662 | Sep 2007 | DE |
0241307 | Oct 1987 | EP |
2117489 | May 2010 | EP |
2853287 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2560730 | Nov 2016 | EP |
3138605 | Mar 2017 | EP |
2098198 | Sep 2017 | EP |
WO9858990 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO03081976 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO03092326 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004004416 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004014269 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004014270 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2007024657 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2009124045 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2009124174 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2009149069 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2010000027 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010083554 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2011011409 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO2011109486 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO2011133747 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012010195 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2013043176 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO2013063355 | May 2013 | WO |
WO2014011441 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO2014011582 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO2014046662 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO2014164023 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2015065442 | May 2015 | WO |
WO2016016821 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO2016190886 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO2016191429 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO2016207856 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO2017027045 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO2017027046 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO2017029615 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO2017034530 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO2017046650 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO2017087004 | May 2017 | WO |
WO2017105510 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO2017105511 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO2017105604 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO2017172566 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO2018190813 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO2018191314 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO2018199936 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO2018217187 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO2019083540 | May 2019 | WO |
WO2019160555 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO2020092185 | May 2020 | WO |
WO2021201845 | Oct 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search and Written Opinion dated May 24, 2018 for PCT App. Ser. No. PCT/US2017/058620. |
Ju Hyun Jeon et al., “Reversing the Polarity of a Cochlear Implant Magnet After Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Auris Nasus Larynx, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 415-417, Aug. 1, 2012. |
Teissl et al., “Magentic Resonance Imaging and Cochlear Implants: Compatibility and Safety Aspects,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Society For Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 26-38, Jan. 1, 1999. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,322, filed Oct. 17, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,291, filed Aug. 31, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/610,502, filed Nov. 2, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/499,311, filed Sep. 29, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/754,126, filed Apr. 6, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/966,885, filed Aug. 1, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/966,885, filed Aug. 1, 2020, 20210046311 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/499,311, filed Sep. 29, 2019, 20210106815 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/355,225, filed Jun. 23, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/335,161, filed Jun. 1, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,343, filed Jun. 14, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/610,502, filed Nov. 2, 2019, 20210156934 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/568,469, filed Oct. 21, 2017, 20180110985 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/770,207, filed Apr. 22, 2018, U.S. Pat. No. 10,806,936. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,322, filed Oct. 17, 2020, 20210170167 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/060,383, filed Jun. 7, 2018, U.S. Pat. No. 10,532,209. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/591,054, filed May 9, 2017, U.S. Pat. No. 9,919,154. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/009,600, filed Jun. 15, 2018, U.S. Pat. No. 10,821,279. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/403,582, filed May 5, 2019, U.S. Pat. No. 10,463,849. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,291, filed Aug. 31, 2020, 20200391023 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/610,502, filed Nov. 2, 2019, U.S. Pat. No. 11,287,495. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/568,470, filed Oct. 21, 2017, U.S. Pat. No. 10,300,276. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/101,390, filed Aug. 10, 2018, 20190046797 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,808, filed Sep. 13, 2017, U.S. Pat. No. 10,646,712. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/805,025, filed Nov. 6, 2017, U.S. Pat. No. 10,646,718. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/852,457, filed Apr. 18, 2020, 20200238088 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/499,311, filed Sep. 29, 2019, U.S. Pat. No. 11,097,095. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/355,225, filed Jun. 23, 2021, 20210316136 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/603,868, filed Oct. 9, 2019, 20200114151 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/754,126, filed Apr. 6, 2020, 20200330777 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/335,161, filed Jun. 1, 2021, 20210339021 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,343, filed Jun. 14, 2021, 20210299456 A1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,813, filed Oct. 12, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200330777 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |