As electronic and digital content being used in enterprise settings or other organizations as the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management has increased, so has the need for streamlined collaboration and sharing of digital content and documents. In such a collaboration environment, multiple users are sharing, accessing, and otherwise performing actions or tasks on content and files in a shared work space. This shared access requires high availability of the data (e.g., an unfettered ability to download and upload files) as any number of users may have access to a given file or may want to or need to perform an action on the file at any given time.
To improve availability, the content and/or files within a shared work space may reside within one or more modules (e.g., storage systems) in the collaboration environment. Various backup or replicated modules on which the data resides can be used to access the data in the event that an original (or primary) module is unavailable. The backup or replicated modules can serve the users until the original module has recovered. Unfortunately, the current systems for identifying a failed or failing module and switching between the failed module and a working module require administer intervention and introduce additional latency in client response times. Administrator intervention can result in system downtime where the data is temporary unavailable. Accordingly, enhanced health monitoring, as disclosed herein, can promote maximum data availability in web-based collaboration environments.
The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.
Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
Prior art systems have focused on checking the health or monitoring systems configurations each time a client request is received at a host or front-end system. Performing this type of monitoring can increase response times impacting overall system performance. Further, manual administrator intervention is typically required to switch between failed modules resulting in system downtime and unavailability of services described herein. The systems and methods described herein provide for automatic monitoring and switching between modules in a web-based collaboration environment resulting in improved system availability.
In one embodiment, a health monitoring service is disclosed that monitors internal modules (e.g., storage systems in a data center) as well as external modules (e.g., existing storage service systems such as, for example, the Amazon S3 service). The overall system leverages the existing or external services to provide a seamless web-based collaboration environment with enhanced availability.
Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for enhanced module health monitoring in web-based collaboration environments.
The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 105 and/or the primary services system 150. Client devices 102 will typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102 and/or the host server 105.
For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a smart phone, a PDA, a Blackberry device, a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, a Galaxy, Xoom Tablet, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console, an iPhone, and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.)), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, or Symbian platform.
The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.
Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used in the disclosed technology by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 105).
The collaboration platform or environment 100 hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, real-time services, databases, database items, etc. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform 100. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.
In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may be different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a work space and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.
In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such that each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a work space for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing work space or to a new work space. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a work space.
A diagrammatic illustration of the online collaboration environment and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of
As discussed, the collaboration platform or environment 100 hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access redundantly across multiple storage nodes. For example, in one embodiment, the primary data services system 150 and a second data services system 195 can each comprise one or more storage nodes. In this case, the services provided are storage services (i.e., storing the work items). In one embodiment, the primary data services system 150 comprises a clustered storage system having a plurality of storage nodes. In some cases, to increase availability, the plurality of storage nodes may redundantly replicate the work items across the storage nodes using technology such as, for example, a redundant array of inexpensive disks (RAID). However, in the event of a total failure of the primary data services system 150, the work items are inaccessible to the clients 102. Accordingly, the secondary system 195 provides external storage services to the collaboration environment 100. The work items or services are also redundantly replicated to the secondary system 195 so that the secondary system 195 is used for downloading and uploading the work items in the event of a failure of the primary data service system 150.
In one embodiment, the monitoring system 120 monitors the availability status or health of various modules or systems in the collaboration environment 100. For example, the monitoring system 120 can periodically monitor the availability status of the primary data services system 150 and a second data services system 195. Alternatively or additionally, the monitoring system 120 can monitor the availability status of one or more individual storage servers or storage nodes in the primary data services system 150. Thus, if one or more of the storage nodes or the entire primary data services system 150 is inaccessible, the monitoring system 120 can identify the node or data center and mark the state of the system as unavailable or unhealthy (“OFF”). The one or more individual storage nodes and/or primary data services system 150 and/or the secondary system 195 can be unavailable if, for example, the node or data center goes down (e.g., loses connectivity, power, etc.).
In one embodiment, in order to monitor the modules, the monitoring system 120 generates requests to access one or more of the modules. If the storage node does not respond, or if the response is too slow, the monitoring system can mark the storage node or system as unavailable. More detailed examples of the monitoring system 120 are discussed with reference to
In one embodiment, client devices 102 communicate with the host server 105 over network 106. As shown, host server 105 also communicates with the primary data services system 150 and a second data services system 195 over network 106. In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102, the host server 105, and/or the primary data services system 150 and a second data services system 195 communicate, may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.
The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 105 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).
In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone Service (D-Amps), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G, 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, 3G LTE, 3GPP LTE, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, UMTS-TDD, 1xRTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks or messaging protocols.
The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.
When deployed in a organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associate work items. For example, work space A 205 may be associated with work items 215, work space B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and work space N can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 may be unique to each work space but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one work space (e.g., work space A 205) or it may be associated with multiple work spaces (e.g., Work space A 205 and work space B 225, etc.).
In general, each work space has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, work space A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, work spaces deployed in an enterprise may be department specific. For example, work space B may be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.
Each user associated with a work space can generally access the work items associated with the work space. The level of access will depend on permissions associated with the specific work space, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions can be set for the work space or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a work space (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates work space B) can set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210. Creator user A 208 may also set different permission settings for each work item, which may be the same for different users, or varying for different users.
In each work space A, B . . . N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the work space, other users in the same work space may be notified (e.g., in real time or in near real time, or not in real time). Activities which trigger real time notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the work space, uploading, downloading, adding, deleting a work item in the work space, creating a discussion topic in the work space.
Specifically, items or content downloaded or edited in accordance with the techniques described in the present disclosure can be cause notifications to be generated. Such notifications can be sent to relevant users to notify them of actions surrounding a download, an edit, a change, a modification, a new file, a conflicting version, an upload of an edited or modified file.
In one embodiment, in a user interface to the web-based collaboration platform where notifications are presented, users can, via the same interface, create action items (e.g., tasks) and delegate the action items to other users including collaborators pertaining to a work item 215, for example. The collaborators 206 may be in the same workspace A 205 or the user may include a newly invited collaborator. Similarly, in the same user interface where discussion topics can be created in a work space (e.g., work space A, B or N, etc.), actionable events on work items can be created and/or delegated/assigned to other users such as collaborators of a given work space 206 or other users. Through the same user interface, task status and updates from multiple users or collaborators can be indicated and reflected. In some instances, the users can perform the tasks (e.g., review or approve or reject, etc.) via the same user interface.
Each of users 316, 318, and 320 can individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the work space 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 can be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., cloud-based environment 100 of
Work items to be edited or viewed can be accessed from the workspace 302 in accordance with the platform and/or application independent mechanisms disclosed herein. Users can also be notified of access, edit, modification, and/or upload related-actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the work space 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time, or not in real time. The notifications can be sent through any of all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform. In the event of multiple notifications, each notification can be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit).
For example, a notification of a download, access, read, write, edit, or uploaded related activities can be presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment.
In one embodiment, a notification feed stream includes updates when an invited user accepts an invitation and/or successfully creates a new account through receipt of an invitation from an existing user. The invited user, upon creation of the new account, receives the account having enhanced features. The new user can automatically be connected to the existing user who sent the invitation. The system can also automatically prompt both users to query they wish to be collaborators in a common work space.
Referring first to
As shown in the example of
A storage node (or storage system) can include a storage server and/or a storage subsystem such as, for example, one or more disk arrays. A storage server is a computer system that is used to store and retrieve data on behalf of one or more clients on a network. In this case, the clients on the network are the host servers 405. A storage server typically operates on behalf of one or more clients to store and manage data in a storage subsystem. The storage subsystem may include a set of mass storage devices, such as magnetic or optical storage-based disks or tapes, flash memories, and/or any mass memory devices. In conventional network storage systems, the mass storage devices can be organized into one or more groups of drives (e.g., redundant array of inexpensive drives (RAID)). In this example, the nodes 408 can be configured to service file-level requests from host servers 405, as in the case of file servers used in a network attached storage (NAS) environment. Alternatively or additionally, the nodes 408 can be configured to service block-level requests from host servers 405, as done by storage servers used in a storage area network (SAN) environment.
The health monitoring system 420 provides the health or availability status of the one or more host servers 405 upon request and/or in response to other events or scenarios so that the one or more host systems 405 can appropriately respond to client requests 404. More specifically, the one or more host servers 405 are able to automatically determine, with information from the health monitoring system 420, whether specific storage servers (nodes) or services are up and running and select the storage servers or nodes appropriately.
In one embodiment, the host server 405 is configured to receive client request 404 from clients such as, for example, clients 102 of
Once selected, the host server 405 queries the health monitoring system 420 via communication link 407 to determine the availability status of the selected storage node(s). In the example of
The host server 500 of the web-based or online collaboration environment can generally be a cloud-based service or a front-end or web server of a cloud based service. The host server 500 can include, for example, a network interface 502, an access manager 505, a module manager 515, and/or an availability manager 525. The access manager 505 can include an upload engine 506 and/or a download engine 507. The module manager 515 can further include a module selection engine 516 and/or a consistency checking engine 517. The availability manager can further include a query engine 526 and/or an error manager 527. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the host server 500 and each illustrated component.
The network interface 502 can be a networking module that enables the host server 500 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server 500, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface 502 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card (e.g., SMS interface, WiFi interface, interfaces for various generations of mobile communication standards including but not limited to 1G, 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, LTE, etc.,), Bluetooth, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” a “handler,” a “detector,” an “interface,” a “processor,” a “tracker,” a “detector,” a “generator,” a “launcher,” a “selector,” an “updator,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, hander, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, hander, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all mediums that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. §101), and to specifically exclude all mediums that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.
One embodiment of the host server 500 includes the access manager 505. The access manager 505 receives client requests, identifies the required service(s), and controls access to the various modules providing those service(s) for serving the received requests. The various modules may be for example, the primary data services system 150, the temporary repository or node 130, and a second data services system 195 of
One embodiment of the host server 500 includes the module manager 515 which generally selects and switches between modules based on availability determined by the availability manager 525. For example, if a primary data center is down the module is responsible for automatically selecting and switching the selected module to a secondary data center (e.g., an Amazon S3 service). In addition, if one of the modules (or storage servers) within the primary data center is down then the module manager 515 selects a different module and ensures that module is available. The module manager 515 may then temporarily select modules from a different pool or group of modules giving the downed module or storage server time to recover. Accordingly, all access requests that would have gone to the downed module will now be directed to another available module within the data center and/or a secondary data center service (e.g., Amazon S3).
The module manager 515 includes a module selection engine 516. In the case of read requests, the module selection engine 516 is configured to select a module (or multiple modules in the case of write requests) from a pool or group of modules that have the identified service (e.g., file, work item, or real-time service) stored thereon. In one embodiment, in the case of write requests, the module selection engine 516 selects a single module from a group of modules that are part of a primary data service system, and also writes to (selects) the temporary module and the external data service system such as, for example, the Amazon S3 service. The module selection engine 516 can select the appropriate module based on any number of factors such as, for example, the load of the various nodes on which the required service, file, or work item is stored. Other factors may include, but are not limited to, module response time, system preferences, geographical locations, and/or any other property of the system.
The module manager 515 also includes a consistency checking engine 517. The consistency checking engine 517 works in conjunction with the access manager 505 to ensure that the data uploaded and/or downloaded to/from the data centers is accurate. For example, in one embodiment, after writing a file to a storage server in a collaboration platform or environment, the access manager 505 may confirm that the file is transferred properly by confirming the size of the transferred file. The size of a file can be confirmed in some cases by reading meta-data from the module onto which the file was written.
In other embodiments, the consistency checking engine 517 may perform a checksum on a file. A checksum is a fixed-size datum computed from an arbitrary block of digital data for the purpose of detecting accidental errors that may have been introduced during its transmission or storage. The integrity of the data can be checked at any later time by recomputing the checksum and comparing it with the stored one. If the checksums match, the data were almost certainly not altered (either intentionally or unintentionally). The checksum may be used for deduping in some embodiments. For example, if ten users upload the same file, only one file may be stored.
One embodiment of the host server 500 includes the availability manager 525. The availability manager 525 includes a query engine 526 and an error engine 527. The query engine 526 may generate queries to, and process responses from, a health monitoring system to determine the availability status of various modules within the web-based collaboration environment. In one embodiment, each query identifies one or more of the selected modules. The query engine 526 may generate and send a query responsive to each received client request allowing the host server 500 to bifurcate or offload the monitoring responsibilities. Alternatively or additionally, the query engine 526 may intelligently send a query for a number of client requests received within a specific time frame.
The error engine 527 is configured to identify a failure in the health monitoring system and fall back to monitoring system in which the host server 500 checks the availability of the file or work item from an application running on a module in response to each of the client requests. This provides greater granularity but also increases overhead and reduces scalability because of the additional latency added to each client request. In some embodiments, the error engine 527 may be configured to automatically switch back to using the health monitoring system once the health monitor recovers.
The health monitoring system 600 can include, for example, a network interface 602, one or more health check modules 610, and a health check management module 635. The health check modules 610 can further include an external monitor engine 611, an internal monitor engine 612, a consistency module 613, and/or a module state list 614. The health check management module 535 can further include a leader and quorum engine 536 and/or a health module manager 537. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the host server 500 and each illustrated component.
The network interface 602 can be a networking module that enables the health monitoring system 600 to monitor the health of various modules or entities that are external to the health monitoring system 600 in a web-based collaboration environment, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the health monitoring system 600 and the external entities. The network interface 602 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card (e.g., SMS interface, WiFi interface, interfaces for various generations of mobile communication standards including but not limited to 1G, 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, LTE, etc.,), Bluetooth, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
One embodiment of the health monitoring system 600 includes the one or more health check modules 610. The health check modules 610 can include an external monitor engine 611, an internal monitor engine 612, a consistency module 613, and/or a module state list 614. The external monitor engine 611 and the internal monitor engine 612 are configured to monitor or poll the availability status or health of external services such as, for example, Amazon S3, and one or more internally managed data centers or modules, respectively. In one embodiment, monitoring or checking the availability status or health of the external services and internal data center(s) is triggered by one or more system timers. Advantageously, the system timer(s) may be configured to check the availability status with a frequency or rate high enough to establish reliability but lower than the rate at which the health monitoring system 600 receives availability status queries from the one or more host servers. In one example, the external monitor engine 611 and the internal monitor engine 612 may generate faux file store requests, store the files on the module or storage server being monitored and subsequently request the file from the module or storage server.
The consistency module 613 compares the stored file or work item against the received file or work item to determine whether the files are equivalent. In one embodiment, the module state list 614 can be updated to indicate that the files are equivalent. For example, if the files are equivalent then the availability status of the module may be set to “ON.” Conversely, if the files are not equivalent then the availability status may be set to “OFF.” In addition to the equivalency or consistency check, the availability status may also take into account the response time. For example, in some instances the availability status may be represented numerically (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 is the most available, 1 is the least available and 0 is unavailable). This availability status can be provided to the one or more host servers to be used in selecting accessible modules.
In one embodiment, the module state list 614 may also timestamp states of the modules so that the health monitoring system and/or one or more host servers can fall back to module (e.g., server) configuration files that are known to be good. The configuration files, or config files, configure the initial settings for some computer programs. For example, the configuration files can be used for user applications, server processes and operating system settings, etc.
In one embodiment, Apache ZooKeeper™ can be used by the health check modules 610 to manage the various module states. ZooKeeper™ is a centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. These services are typically used by distributed applications. Advantageously, ZooKeeper™ includes ordering properties that enable events that change the state of the module to be processed in the order they occurred. Thus, a module that changes from an “ON” state to an “OFF” state and quickly back to an “ON” state will have the proper “ON” status stored within the health check module 610. It is appreciated that although that any configuration service can be used that maintains event ordering properties.
One embodiment of the health monitoring system 600 includes the health check management module 635. The health check management module 635 can further include a leader and quorum engine 636 configured to identify a leader among the plurality of health check modules 510 and/or determine a quorum of the availability status determinations made by the plurality of health check modules 610. The health module manager 537 can switch between the health check modules 610 in the event that one or more of the health check modules 610 fails. The health module manager 637 is configured to facilitate the ordered or fast failing of the failfast health check modules 610.
In process 702, the host server receives a client download request or request to access (and not modify) a service. The client request can be received over a network as discussed with respect to
In process 706, the host determines whether the primary module is available. For example, the host server may query a health monitoring system to determine the status of the primary module. The health monitoring system can respond to the query with an indication as to whether the primary module is available. If the primary module is available, in process 708, the host server accesses the service identified by the client request at the primary module. For example, the host server may access the file identify by the client request at a primary storage system in the data center. In process 710, the service is verified. For example, the host server may perform a check on the size of the file downloaded from the primary storage system or a checksum. If the file size matches the file size on the primary storage server then the verification is successful.
If the primary module is not available, in process 712, the host server determines if a secondary module provides the services requested by the client request. For example, a secondary storage node or server in the same data center as the primary node may have redundant access to the request service. For example, a file may be stored redundantly across a plurality of nodes in the same data center. The file may also be available from a temporary node. In process 714, the host server determines whether the secondary module is available. If the secondary module is available, in process 716, the host server accesses the service identified by the client request at the secondary module. For example, the host server may access the file identify by the client request at a secondary storage system or node in the data center. In process 718, the service is verified at the secondary storage system.
If the secondary module is not available, in process 720, the host server accesses the external module or service and, in process 722, verifies the service at the external module. It is appreciated that the secondary module does not have to be implemented. In such cases steps 712-718 can be omitted and the host system will access the external module in the event that the primary module is unavailable.
Process 800, and in particular processes 802-822, is similar to process 700 of
In process 902, the health monitoring system identifies a plurality of modules to monitor in a web-based collaboration environment. In one embodiment, the modules are identified based on configuration settings and/or administer intervention. However, in some embodiments, the health monitoring system may proactively discover and identify modules in the collaboration environment to monitor.
In process 904, the health monitoring system monitors the availability status of the modules. This process is discussed in greater detail with respect to
In process 906, the health monitoring system receives a query from a host or front-end server identifying one or more of the modules. In process 908, the health monitoring system processes the query to determine an availability status of the identified one or more modules. In one embodiment, the health monitoring system keeps a list or a database that includes the current state or availability status of each of the modules that it is monitoring. The health monitoring system accesses this list or database to determine whether the identified one or more modules are available. Lastly, in process 910, the health monitoring system sends a response to the host system indicating the availability status of the one or more identified modules. Advantageously, the monitoring of the modules is bifurcated from the host or front-end server to offload the monitoring burden.
In process 1002, the health monitoring system determines whether it should monitor the current state of the modules in the web-based collaboration environment. As discussed, the health monitoring system may monitor the modules every 1-2 seconds. For example, the health monitoring system may include one or more timers that notify the health monitoring system to commence the monitoring processes.
In process 1004, the health monitoring system generates a file store request. For example, the health monitoring system may generate a random or faux file and, in process 1006, store the file on a selected module or storage server. In process 1008, the health monitoring system requests the file from the selected storage system and, in process 1010, the health monitoring system compares the stored and the requested files. In one embodiment, the health monitoring system may perform a checksum or check the size of the requested file to ensure that the storage server or node is working properly. In some cases, the health monitoring system may also not the response time.
In process 1014, the health monitoring system sets the state of the storage server or node (or any module). If, for example, the request to download the random file exceeded a threshold in process 1010 then the health monitoring system may deem the storage server “OFF.” Alternatively, if the availability status is kept numerically (e.g., on a scale 0-5), the health monitoring system may assign the storage server or module a lesser than perfect numerical availability status if the file is received properly but the response time exceeds one or more thresholds.
In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The machine may be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
The network interface device enables the machine 1100 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall may additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.
Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc. without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges.
The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.
These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.
While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6 will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/579,551 entitled “MODULE STATUS MONITORING USING HEALTH CHECK SERVICES”, which was filed on Dec. 22, 2011, the contents of which are all incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5787175 | Carter | Jul 1998 | A |
5799320 | Klug | Aug 1998 | A |
5848415 | Guck | Dec 1998 | A |
5864870 | Guck | Jan 1999 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6016467 | Newsted et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073161 | DeBoskey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260040 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289345 | Yasue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345386 | Delo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370543 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385606 | Inohara et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396593 | Laverty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636872 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662186 | Esquibel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714968 | Prust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735623 | Prust | May 2004 | B1 |
6742181 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6947162 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952724 | Prust | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010752 | Ly | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039806 | Friedman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069393 | Miyata et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7133834 | Abelow | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149787 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152182 | Ji et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
7275244 | Bell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7296025 | Kung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7346778 | Guiter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370269 | Prabhu et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7386535 | Kalucha et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401117 | Dan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7543000 | Castro et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7581221 | Lai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620565 | Abelow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647559 | Yozell-Epstein et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650367 | Arruza | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661088 | Burke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665093 | Maybee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698363 | Dan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7734600 | Wise et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7756843 | Palmer | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7814426 | Huesken et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7886287 | Davda | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7890964 | Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937663 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979296 | Kruse et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996374 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8027976 | Ding et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
RE42904 | Stephens, Jr. | Nov 2011 | E |
8065739 | Bruening et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117261 | Briere et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140513 | Ghods et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8151183 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8214747 | Yankovich et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230348 | Peters et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8326814 | Ghods et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8347276 | Schadow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358701 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370803 | Holler et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8429540 | Yankovich et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8464161 | Giles et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8515902 | Savage | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527549 | Cidon | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549066 | Donahue et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8549511 | Seki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583619 | Ghods et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8607306 | Bridge et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8719445 | Ko | May 2014 | B2 |
8745267 | Luecke et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8849955 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8868574 | Kiang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8892679 | Destagnol et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8914900 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010027492 | Gupta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020029218 | Bentley et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099772 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133509 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194177 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030041095 | Konda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093404 | Bader et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110264 | Whidby et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115326 | Verma et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135536 | Lyons | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135565 | Estrada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154306 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204490 | Kasriel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021686 | Barberis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088647 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111415 | Scardino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117438 | Considine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122949 | Zmudzinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177138 | Salle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181579 | Huck et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196307 | Zak et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201604 | Kraenzel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230624 | Frolund et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246532 | Inada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267836 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005276 | Morgan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022229 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063083 | Dart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097225 | Glatt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102328 | Ring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108406 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114305 | Haynes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114378 | Elien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138118 | Banatwala et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182966 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198299 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198452 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234943 | Clarke | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261933 | Magnuson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060005163 | Huesken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026502 | Dutta | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041603 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047804 | Fredricksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053088 | Ali et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070083 | Brunswig et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075071 | Gillette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117247 | Fite et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123062 | Bobbitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133340 | Rybak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168550 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174051 | Lordi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174054 | Matsuki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179070 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060259524 | Horton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265719 | Astl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016680 | Burd et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079242 | Jolley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100830 | Beedubail et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118598 | Bedi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124460 | McMullen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124737 | Wensley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130163 | Perez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198609 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208878 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214180 | Crawford | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220590 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250762 | Mansfield | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256065 | Heishi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266304 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282848 | Kiilerich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283443 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288290 | Motoyama et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005135 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005195 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016146 | Gan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021959 | Naghi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040173 | Aleong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040503 | Kleks et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046828 | Bibliowicz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059656 | Saliba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091763 | Devonshire et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104277 | Tian | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114720 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133674 | Knauerhase et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140732 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151817 | Fitchett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154873 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182628 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183467 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184130 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194239 | Hagan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215883 | Fok et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222654 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250333 | Reeves et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250348 | Alimpich et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263099 | Brady-Kalnay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271095 | Shafton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276158 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294899 | Gazzetta et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090015864 | Hasegawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019093 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019426 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030710 | Levine | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044128 | Baumgarten et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049131 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090119322 | Mills et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125469 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132651 | Roger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150417 | Ghods et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150627 | Benhase et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158142 | Arthursson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164438 | Delacruz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171983 | Samji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193107 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193345 | Wensley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198772 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210459 | Nair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214115 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235167 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235181 | Saliba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235189 | Aybes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249224 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254589 | Nair et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260060 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265430 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271708 | Peters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282212 | Peterson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300527 | Malcolm et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327358 | Lukiyanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327961 | De Vorchik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011292 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011447 | Jothimani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017262 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036929 | Scherpa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057560 | Skudlark et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057785 | Khosravy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076946 | Barker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082634 | Leban | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083136 | Komine et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088150 | Mazhar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092126 | Kaliszek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093310 | Gbadegesin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151431 | Miller | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153835 | Xiong et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162365 | Del Real | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162374 | Nair | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179940 | Gilder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185463 | Noland et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185932 | Coffman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191689 | Cortes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198783 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198871 | Stiegler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198944 | Ho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205537 | Knighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218237 | Ferris et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223378 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229085 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235526 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241611 | Zuber | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241972 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250120 | Waupotitsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262582 | Garcia-Ascanio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267588 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274772 | Samuels | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281118 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306379 | Ferris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318893 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325155 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325527 | Estrada et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325559 | Westerinen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325655 | Perez | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332962 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001763 | Murakami | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016409 | Grosz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022559 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029883 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040812 | Phillips | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047413 | McGill et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047484 | Mount et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052155 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054968 | Galaviz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055299 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055721 | Jain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061045 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061046 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065082 | Gal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066951 | Ward-Karet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083167 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093567 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099006 | Sundararaman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107205 | Chow et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113320 | Neff et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119313 | Sung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137991 | Russell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142410 | Ishii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145744 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161289 | Pei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167125 | Achlioptas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167353 | Grosz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202424 | Chun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202599 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238458 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238759 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239135 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246294 | Robb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246950 | Luna et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252071 | Cidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252320 | Arrasvuori et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252339 | Lemonik et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258561 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282710 | Akkiraju et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296022 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313803 | Friend et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320197 | Conejero et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036370 | Lim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064879 | Panei | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072436 | Pierre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092055 | Peschke et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110005 | Kuo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110436 | Adler, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110443 | Lemonik et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117626 | Yates et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124306 | Abercrombie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124547 | Halbedel | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130900 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134491 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144283 | Hill et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150888 | Hyatt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158908 | Luna et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159178 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159310 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173625 | Berger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192055 | Antebi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192086 | Ghods et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203908 | Beaty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214444 | McBride et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218885 | Abel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221789 | Felter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233155 | Gallmeier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233205 | McDermott | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233543 | Vagell et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257249 | Natarajan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263166 | Cho et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266203 | Elhadad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284638 | Cutler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284664 | Zhao | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291011 | Quine | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296790 | Robb | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309540 | Holme et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311157 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317239 | Mulder et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317487 | Lieb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328259 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331177 | Jensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331441 | Adamson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007471 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007894 | Dang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013560 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014023 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042106 | Persaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055127 | Saito et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073403 | Tuchman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080919 | Kiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117376 | Filman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124638 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138608 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138615 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159411 | Bowen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163289 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167253 | Seleznev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185347 | Romano | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185558 | Seibert et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191339 | Haden et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198600 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212486 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218978 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239049 | Perrodin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246932 | Zaveri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262210 | Savage et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262862 | Hartley | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268480 | Dorman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268491 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275398 | Dorman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275429 | York et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275509 | Micucci et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282830 | Besen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305039 | Gauda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326344 | Masselle et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140013112 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019497 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019498 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032489 | Hebbar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032616 | Nack | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033277 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033291 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052939 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068589 | Barak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140150023 | Gudorf et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156373 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172595 | Beddow et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2724521 | Nov 2009 | CA |
101997924 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102264063 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0348614 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0921661 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1349088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1528746 | May 2005 | EP |
1933242 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2372574 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2610776 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2453924 | Apr 2009 | GB |
2471282 | Dec 2010 | GB |
09-101937 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11-025059 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2003273912 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004310272 | Nov 2004 | JP |
09-269925 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008250944 | Oct 2008 | JP |
20020017444 | Mar 2002 | KR |
20040028036 | Apr 2004 | KR |
20050017674 | Feb 2005 | KR |
20060070306 | Jun 2006 | KR |
20060114871 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070043353 | Apr 2007 | KR |
20070100477 | Oct 2007 | KR |
20100118836 | Nov 2010 | KR |
20110074096 | Jun 2011 | KR |
20110076831 | Jul 2011 | KR |
WO-0007104 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0219128 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2006028850 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2007024438 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007035637 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007113573 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2008011142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008076520 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2011109416 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2012167272 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013009328 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013013217 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013041763 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 mailed on Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 Mailed Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 Mailed Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages. |
“PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 4 pages. |
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
Google Docs, http://web.Archive.org/web/20100413105758/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages. |
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 28, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages. |
Search Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90. |
“Average Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages. |
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages. |
“Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages. |
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages. |
Delendik, “My PDF.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages. |
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages. |
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages. |
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages. |
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page. |
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 13 pages. |
Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/20100528195550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet—forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20. |
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!—Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages. |
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages. |
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32. |
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6. |
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages. |
User's Guide for SMART Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages. |
Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WOWO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 19, 2015, 6 pages. |
“Agilewords—How to Request Approval,” YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Ov3DYNN3Q, Jan. 31, 2011, 2 pages. |
“Agilewords—Features, Powerful Features Yet Simple,” Jun. 1, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20110601223756/http://agilewords.com/product/features, 3 pages. |
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 42 pages. |
Exam Report for EP 13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312264.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 30, 2015, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316685.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for EP 13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 13, 2015, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130162444 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61579551 | Dec 2011 | US |