Wireless communication devices, including cell phones, mobile phones and other smart communication devices, operate by inducing movement of various forms of electromagnetic waves that carry packeted information including voice and data. These devices also produce radiation. Medical science accumulated over the past 15 years confirms health risks from the certain combinations of energy waves producing electromagnetic radiation from such device use. For example, brain cancer risk increases, especially after ten years of cell phone use. There is a pronounced five-fold increase in brain cancer when use begins in the teenage years and such use increases risk of benign tumors of the brain, tumors of the acoustic nerve, and tumors of the eyes.
There are also documented health risks from non-cancer conditions. For example, cell phone use has been reported to increase risk of impairment such as: anxiety disorders, sleep disorders, memory disorders, electro-hypersensitivity, learning disorders, Autism, ADD, ADHD, temper disorders and other behavioural disorders.
As used in this application, a wireless communication device (WCD) is any device that can make and receive telephone calls, carrying voice, or data or other information, over any system that includes a wireless radio link. As is well known, such devices are useful while moving from place to place. WCDs as used herein also include mobile devices that receive and transmit video and text. A battery that may be rechargeable provides power for the WCD functions. The WCD includes an input mechanism (keypads, touchscreen, etc.) that operates the WCD functions.
There is also medical evidence that people with other health conditions not necessarily caused by WCD exposures are made worse by the exposures and the efficacy of medicines used to treat medical conditions are sometimes rendered less effective when there is WCD exposure.
WCD use while driving has been linked to dramatic increase in automobile accidents and fatalities. Twenty-seven states in the U.S. have mandated the use of headsets on WCDs to protect against accident risk.
During the past five years, both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate have held hearings on WCD health and safety dangers.
There are at present personal injury and product liability cases moving through the Courts in the United States, Europe and Israel, brought by plaintiffs who suffer from brain tumors whose cause they ascribe to their WCD use.
In several states in the U.S., legislation has been introduced or otherwise considered that would affix health risk warning labels on WCDs with admonitions to use headsets as one risk mitigation step.
The equivalent of the Senate in France is considering legislation that would restrict promotion and sale of WCDs and other wireless devices to children and would require headsets to be included in each WCD sold.
The scientific literature addressing the underlying health risks ascribed to cell phone and other wireless device use numbers more than 18,000 peer-reviewed papers and reports. Included are three books by G. Carlo. One of those, “Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age”, a best-selling book published in 2001 and now printed in six languages, was the first to define a summary of the nature of cell phone radiation hazards for the non-scientific public. Among the recommendations made was the use of headsets.
In the United States and other countries around the world, there are emission standards that are intended to provide a margin of safety for WCD users that are based on the heat-inducing intensity of the electromagnetic fields produced by WCDs. These standards are expressed in Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) units which represents the amount of radiation passing through a gram of tissue per unit of time. The present standard SAR is 1.6 watts per kilogram.
The nature of WCD emissions, including harmful radiation and wave forms, and the emerging scientific literature makes clear that there are several mechanisms of harm active with respect to WCD dangers. There is universal acceptance in the scientific literature that there are two distinct radiation plumes emitted by WCDs that carry different types of danger, as well as effects generated by electromagnetic radiation produced by the internal circuitry of the WCDs. The most serious is the so-called ‘near-field plume’, which is the result of the power surge necessary to carry WCD signals to transmission base stations. There is also an ambient or ‘far-field’ plume that carries with it unique health risk considerations. The concern about radiation produced by the circuitry is direct-contact exposure that produces allergic reactions in susceptible and sensitive users.
There is near universal acceptance in the scientific literature that the dual waveform—temporally-coherent carrier wave and spatially-coherent modulated wave—that is necessary for communication of information through wireless signals, is responsible for the biological responses elicited by both plumes.
The special significance of the near-field plume is that it emanates in all directions from the WCD internal antenna about six to ten inches, depending upon the type of WCD , geographic location of the WCD during a call, position of the WCD during the call, and the characteristics of the user (for example, there is deeper penetration into the heads of children because of the different biological make-up of their growing brain tissues.).
The penetration of this biologically active near-field plume into the brain is uniquely dangerous to brain tissue because brain tissue is highly vulnerable to environmental stressors. Brain cells, unlike all other cells in the human body, have very limited capacity for adaptation and self-protection. Thus, the human skull has evolved as a protection against trauma and the blood-brain barrier has evolved as a protection against dangerous circulating chemical exposures. Scientific data show that dangers from WCDs include both direct adverse impact on brain cells and tissue and diminution in the effectiveness of protective mechanisms including impact on the integrity of both the skull and the blood-brain barrier.
The penetrating Information Carrying Radio Waves (ICRW) from wireless communication devices (a dual wave form with a high-frequency carrier signal and a low-frequency secondary wave caused by modulation techniques) represents an evolutionarily new environmental exposure phenomenon so humans have not yet evolved a natural protective system.
The need, therefore, is to protect sensitive brain tissue from the near-field plume of ICRW by moving the plume away from the brain tissue and other human body tissue. This is called primary prevention in medical and public health jargon—eliminating the dangerous exposure. The present new headset is thus a means of primary prevention in this regard.
Since the middle 1990s, there have been various varieties of headsets available for wireless devices. However, consumer research indicates that the current wired headsets on the market are considered to be cumbersome—especially the wire which is inconvenient, non-stylist, flimsy and are not therefore used. If they are not used because of these reasons, they offer no public health and safety protection benefit.
The present invention addresses these practical concerns and seeks to present a new headset platform that is convenient, stylish, strong, durable, of high sound-quality, and transportable from one device type to another. The present invention is designed specifically to protect against near-field plume health and safety dangers, migration of circuitry-induced radiation that harms sensitive and susceptible users, and the effects of excursions of ambient electromagnetic radiation drawn into the bio-field of the WCD user.
There are two general types of headsets on the market presently: wired headsets and wireless or complete-range headsets. In the preferred embodiment, the present disclosure is an improvement on wired headsets or earphones and an improvement on complete-range wireless headsets which themselves carry broad and penetrative near-field plumes which have the same health risks associated with raw WCD exposures themselves. Both types have their problems which may be improved by this disclosure.
There are a number of manufacturers, with the largest market shares owned by Jabra and Plantronics. These companies carry both wired and wireless versions that are offered as ‘conveniences’ rather than ‘safety features’. It is noteworthy that some companies in the wireless industry itself openly recognize WCD dangers in their product literature. Some others indirectly infer the presence of WCD dangers in their user manuals. In either case, they do recommend headsets as a ‘convenience’ while still recommending keeping the WCD a safe distance from the head.
Thus, the invention distinguishes itself in use from the products of these manufacturers in that the platform design is specifically addressing the health and safety concerns while also improving on the convenience and usability aspects.
Wireless headsets do not address the safety issue because they are in themselves WCDs that change the near-field plume penetration profile but do not eliminate exposure to the near-field plume as does the present disclosure. In addition, the complete-range headsets introduce an additional type of ICRW exposure by virtue of their operating wireless signal which connects to the WCD itself. These devices also draw ambient electromagnetic radiation into the users bio-field from other sources in the environment, including WiFi signals, emergency communications systems and satellite communications. So in effect, they increase the health risks to some, as yet unknown, degree. Of note is that the wireless interface encompassed within the non-direct contact embodiments of this invention emits a plume of energy that does not leave the encapsulation of the WCD case itself, thus rendering no additional exposure to harmful radiation of wave-forms to the use of WCD case described in this disclosure.
As noted above, there are numerous variations and equivalents of the present invention that should be appreciated by those skilled in the art. The present invention is intended to encompass those equivalents and variations.
The present invention improves upon existing headsets in several ways, including the convenience and protection factors identified above. WCD case 1 seen in
The WCD has a connector for a plug-in (or similar) connection for an earphone (or earphones) for the WCD. The case is provided with such connector or plug-in whereby the earplugs 6 are electronically connected to the WCD either by direct contact or wireless connection. Accordingly, the WCD is electronically attached to one end of the cord 7 whereby sound from the WCD may be heard by a user when an earplug 6 is in a user's ear.
In an alternative embodiment, the wire may include a member (not shown) fixed along the wire at a length whereby the when the wire 7 is being pulled out a sufficient distance (e.g., ten inches) the member passes, for example, the entrance to the case whereby the member trips a switch (not shown) and the WCD and earpiece 6 are activated (or deactivated as the wire is being retracted and less than ten inches of wire 7 extends outside the case 1).
In yet another embodiment the WCD may be placed in speaker mode whereby it is not necessary to hold the WCD to the user's ear or to use the earplug 6 in order to speak and listen to the voice communication. In speaker mode the automatic shutoff mechanism permits operation of the WCD regardless of whether the earphone is in the storage or use position.
By attaching to the negative trough, the ferrite bead positive energy, in effect, disrupts the electromagnetic wave by making it a ‘random’ or ‘incoherent’ wave. An incoherent or random wave does not have the ability to resonate with vibrational receptors that are tubulin protrusions from living cell membranes. Thus, the disrupted wave is not ‘seen’ by the cell membrane receptors and thus the biological effects cascade that leads to symptoms is not triggered.
In a preferred embodiment a solitary ferrite sphere is provided at or near the center of the unit, e.g., at or near the center of the retractor mechanism. This enables an omni-directional effect because the types of electromagnetic wave forms being targeted with the ferrite adjuvant is not from one source. Electromagnetic wave forms can come from many different places in the WCD itself or from ambient sources. An oblong ferrite, or two spheres put side by side, are not as efficient because they are primarily bi-directional emitters requiring prediction of exactly where the waves would be coming from. An oblong or side by side configuration would be similar to a magnet, with the positive charges concentrating on one end or the other of the unit. With a sphere, the positive charges concentrate on the outside of the sphere and it can thus exert its desired, omni-directional effect.
In the preferred embodiment placement of the ferrite is within the WCD case and preferably on the retractor mechanism 10 itself, or as near to the center of the WCD case as possible. This placement will make it centrally located with regard to the electromagnetic field generator that is targeted—the WCD that is encased by the WCD case. Placement of the ferrite bead on the wire requires consideration of where on the wire 7 the ferrite bead is to be placed. If the ferrite bead is located near the earphone 6 and the wire is extended for use, then one of the important intervention functions of the bead itself may be diminished because there could be migration of energy up the wire as far as the ferrite bead, and therefore there is energy on the wire that could attract ambient EMR. Accordingly, placement of the bead on the wire needs to be at the end of the wire opposite the earphone so that it does not leave the central portion of the WCD case when the wire 7 is extended.
As seen in
In
As noted above, there are numerous variations and equivalents of the present invention that should be appreciated by those skilled in the art. The present invention is intended to encompass those equivalents and variations.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/559,106 filed 26 Jul. 2012. This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/513,198 filed 29 Jul. 2011. The contents of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/513,198 is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61513198 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13559106 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14340109 | US |