This application claims priority to the German application No. 10 2004 001 500.7, filed Jan. 9, 2004 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a hearing aid having a reception device for receiving an input signal, a registering device for registering a hearing aid value, a signal generating device for generating a device signal as a function of said hearing aid value, and an output device for feeding out an output signal based on the input signal and device signal. The present invention further relates to a corresponding method for operating a hearing aid.
Signal outputs for program changes, volume adjustments, end of battery life etc. are customary in present-day hearing systems or, as the case may be, hearing aids according to the publication EP 0 557 847 A1. The signal that is fed out is what is termed a device signal, which is to say a signal generated by the hearing aid itself. A device signal is typically generated in the form of a whistling tone. It is generally possible to set at least the frequency and level of said device signal.
It is nevertheless the case that loud ambient noise will prevent the perception of device signals that are very important for the hearing aid wearer. As an instance of this, device signals are obscured by street noise. This problem can be combated by raising the level of the device signal. This will at least reduce the frequency of occurrence with which the device signals are obscured by loud ambient noise. A disadvantage of raising the level is that, especially in a very quiet environment, the device signals will then be experienced as being highly irritating and disagreeable.
A combined hearing aid and audiotone-playing system is known from the publication DE 100 40 660 A1. Externally generated audiotone signals and artificially generated information or warning signals can here be received by a receiving unit belonging to the hearing aid. The received signals can be merged in within the hearing aid, compressed, and mixed in a mutually adjustable manner in terms of frequency response and volume.
An object of the present invention is thus to optimize the perceptibility of device signals in hearing aids.
Said object is achieved by the claims.
A method is furthermore provided for operating a hearing aid.
The principal advantage of the present invention is that prevailing ambient noise is taken into consideration during automatic or, as the case may be, adaptive matching of the device signal. The same advantage comes into effect in the converse case of matching the hearing aid input signal to the device signal. Obscuring can also be successfully prevented advantageously by mutually matching the two signals. As a result, the device signals will, on the one hand, always be perceptible and, on the other hand, will never be experienced as being disagreeable or too loud. Automatic matching of this type will furthermore help enhance the operating convenience and satisfaction of the hearing aid wearer.
The hearing aid value preferably represents a setting value, a status value, and change-of-setting information or change-of-status information. A device signal will be generated thereby in the hearing aid if for example, a certain hearing program has newly launched or the charge level of the hearing aid's battery has become low.
The specific type of device signal can be generated as a function of the hearing aid value. As an instance of this, the frequency of occurrence, the volume, or the melody of a battery status signal can be changed automatically with the charge status of the battery. The duration and level of the device signal and/or its type can furthermore also be matched to the input signal. In this way it is possible for example for the input signal to be muted for a comparatively long period of time before the device signal is fed out when an input signal is loud, while when an input signal is quiet it can be muted a shorter period of time before the device signal is fed out. This will allow obscuring effects to be for the most part prevented.
The level of the input signal can alternatively or additionally also be matched to the device signal. Obscuring effects can likewise also be prevented or reduced in this way. A specific form of this would be total suppression of the input signal when the device signal is fed out. It is possible in this way to ensure that the device signal will be perceived.
In a highly preferred variant the device signal is temporally matched to the input signal. The device signal could in particular only be fed out when the input signal is below a predefined level. This will prove particularly advantageous in the case of status information which is not very time-critical such as, for example, that relating to the battery status.
It can in general be ensured that matching of the device signal to the input signal or of the input signal to the device signal will take place as a function of the level and type of the input signal and/or a classification thereof. A simple decision criterion can thus be provided for said matching.
Specific advantages will also ensue from a combination of the above-cited variants, which is to say from reciprocal automatic mutual matching of the input signals and device signals.
The present invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
The exemplary embodiments described in more detail below are preferred embodiments of the present invention.
The block diagram in
The control signal in the control logic 5 can be triggered manually via a control element 6. An operating interface 7 connected between them generates a corresponding drive signal for the control logic 5. Said control element can be, for example, a program-changing switch, a remote control, or a volume adjustment wheel. A drive signal is consequently also sent to the hearing aid signal processing device 3 from the operating interface 7. Said drive signal can be used, inter alia, to “freeze” compression, background noise suppression, and other adaptive algorithms associated with signal processing while device signals are being fed out and to resume signal processing applying the same setting values when the device signals have been fed out.
Toward that end, the control logic 5 has a timer for specifying the duration of the deactivation of the input signal as well as the duration of the device signal. A control signal is sent by the control logic 5 to the generator 4 and to the changeover switch 2. When a device signal is triggered, muting of the input signal can thus be achieved that is of longer duration than that of the device signal so that masking effects can for the most part be precluded. Muting takes place prior to and during output of the device signal.
According to a second embodiment of the present invention, shown in
The third embodiment, whose block diagram is sketched in
A fourth embodiment of the present invention is shown in
According to a fifth embodiment of the present invention, a device signal will only be fed out if the input signal falls below a certain level for a predefined period of time. This embodiment is not shown in the figures. It has a pause-search algorithm by means of which a time segment having a low level of ambient noise can be determined. A waiting device signal can then be transmitted in this time segment. This means that transmission of the input signal for conveying the device signal will not be irritatingly interrupted or attenuated. This type of notification for the hearing aid wearer would suffice for less time-critical status information such as that relating to, say, the battery status.
According to a sixth embodiment of the present invention shown in
The components shown in
Any practical combinations of the six embodiments presented above are of course also conceivable. Different embodiments can, for example, be implemented simultaneously in the hearing aid and also activated as a function of the input level.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 001 500 | Jan 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4491980 | Ichikawa | Jan 1985 | A |
4660027 | Davis | Apr 1987 | A |
5524150 | Sauer | Jun 1996 | A |
6310556 | Green et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320969 | Killion | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7031481 | Mortensen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20020021814 | Roeck | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020159613 | Killion | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
32 07 412 | Sep 1983 | DE |
100 40 660 | Feb 2001 | DE |
0 557 847 | Sep 1993 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050152567 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |