The present invention relates to a hearing apparatus, particularly a hearing aid, having a microphone for picking up ambient sound from the vicinity of a user. The present invention also relates to a corresponding method for operation of a hearing aid.
In conventional hearing aids, it is impossible to distinguish between the hearing aid wearer's own voice and an external sound source. This can lead to artifacts and incorrect response in various hearing aid algorithms, for example:
The European patent document number EP 1 251 714 A1 discloses a digital hearing aid system in which an occlusion subsystem compensates for the gain of the hearing aid user's own speech in the auditory channel. In this case, an undesirable signal which is received from a rearward microphone is fed back, and is subtracted from the useful signal.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,129 also discloses a hearing aid in which the hearing aid user's own voice is amplified or attenuated. In this case, the sound which is transmitted by bone conduction is detected via an accelerometer or a motion sensor.
The German patent document number DE 33 25 031 C2 describes an infrared headset with two microphones. Their signals are supplied in antiphase to an amplifier, thus preventing or suppressing the transmission of the user's own voice.
Furthermore, the German patent specification number DE 103 32 119 B3 discloses a hearing aid which can be worn in the ear and has a second microphone and a second earpiece, which are arranged in a ventilation channel. The signal for the second earpiece is phase-shifted in order to avoid sound being supplied directly to the hearing.
The object of the present invention is thus to enhance an automatic control of hearing apparatuses in the presence of the user's own voice.
According to various embodiments of the invention, this object is achieved by a hearing apparatus, particularly a hearing aid, having a first microphone for picking up ambient sound from the vicinity of the user, a second microphone for picking up auditory channel sound in the auditory channel or on the auditory channel wall of the user, and an own-voice detection device for detection of the user's own voice from the two microphone signals, and for outputting a corresponding control signal. In addition to a “normal” sound microphone in the auditory channel, a vibration microphone can also be used, (for example, bonded in from the inside), which is connected to the hearing aid housing, and preferably picks up the user's own voice via body sound conduction.
Furthermore, the embodiments of the invention provide a method for operation of a hearing apparatus by picking up a first sound signal from the vicinity of the user, picking up a second sound signal from the auditory channel of the user, detection of the user's own voice by analysis of the two sound signals, and control of the hearing apparatus as a function of the presence of the user's own voice.
Advantageously the activity of the user's own voice is detected permanently and very quickly by the detection approach described above, and this information can then be used directly in the control of algorithms for the hearing apparatus.
This avoids the artifacts and incorrect control actions initiated by the user's own voice.
The user's own-voice detection device preferably has a level analysis unit via which the respective levels of the two microphone signals can be compared, and the presence of the user's own voice in the microphone signals can be detected on the basis of the level comparison. In this case, the occlusion effect of the sound in the auditory channel can advantageously be made use of, on the basis of which the user's own voice produces a considerably higher sound level in the auditory channel, by body sound transmission, than in front of the ear.
It is advantageous to consider only frequencies below 1 kHz for the level analysis. This is because the occlusion effect is most pronounced at the low frequencies.
The hearing apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention may have a BSS device via which separate sources can be identified from the microphone signal or signals, and may have a signal processing device, which can be controlled by the BSS device, in which the drive of the signal processing device by the BSS device remains unchanged at times, when the user's own voice is detected. The means that the extraction of the actual useful signal is not interfered with by the user's own voice.
Furthermore, a hearing apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention may have an AGC device for automatic gain adjustment, which can be temporarily deactivated on detection of the user's own voice, or whose transient time can be temporarily shortened on detection of the user's own voice. In particular, this makes it possible to avoid interference when conversing with a quiet conversation partner.
According to a further embodiment, the hearing apparatus can have a directional microphone which can be deactivated on detection of the user's own voice. This allows an “intelligent directional microphone” to be operated without interference even when the hearing aid wearer is speaking himself.
The present invention is explained below in more detail with reference to the attached drawing, which is a block circuit diagram of a hearing aid according to an embodiment of the invention.
The exemplary embodiment which is described in more detail in the following text represents one preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The problems with the AGC, the BSS, and the intelligent directional microphone which occur when the hearing aid wearer is speaking himself are solved by the detection of the user's own voice with the aid of a separate auditory channel microphone, or microphone Ml within the auditory channel. According to the FIGURE, this is located in the auditory channel GG, in the same way as the earpiece of the hearing aid chosen here. In the present example, two external microphones ME1 and ME2 are located outside the auditory channel GG, in order to pick up the ambient sound from the area surrounding the user or hearing aid wearer.
The detection of the user's own voice is based on the permanent comparison of the signals picked up by the external hearing aid microphones ME1 and ME2 and the internal auditory channel microphone Ml. In the present case, a level analysis PA is carried out on the microphone signals for this purpose. A user's own-voice detection process ED, which follows the level analysis PA, produces a signal which in the simplest case is a binary signal, indicating whether the user's own voice has been detected. Depending on his, a signal generator SG produces a control signal in order to drive a signal processing unit in the hearing aid.
In the present case, the hearing aid has the following signal processing units: a microphone array processing unit MV, for example, whose BSS (and adaptive directional microphone) picks up the microphone signals from the external microphones ME1 and ME2, followed by a feedback suppression device RU, followed by a noise detection unit RR and, finally, an AGC unit for production of an amplified signal for the earpiece H.
Both the microphone processing device MV, including the BSS and the intelligent directional microphone, as well as the amplification unit AGC can be driven and/or influenced by the user's own voice detection PA, ED, SG.
This means that the information about the activity of the user's own voice is used directly for controlling the algorithms mentioned above. By way of example, this allows the BSS adaptation control to be “frozen” when the user's own voice is detected. Furthermore, however, “freezing” of the AGC or temporary shortening of the transient time is also possible when the user's own voice is active. In addition, the directional microphone for detection of the user's own voice can be deactivated in order to provide an “intelligent directional microphone”. Otherwise, it would not be possible to distinguish between this and a 0° signal, and the directional microphone would be activated.
In the present example, a level analysis is carried out for detection of the user's own voice. If required, this can be combined with a delay-time analysis or some other analysis.
All of the external signals appear to be quieter in the case of in-the-ear appliances in the auditory channel GG than at the external microphones ME1 and ME2 because of the attenuation effect of the autoplasty and of the hearing aid. The hearing aid gain, which is known for the respective situation, can be taken into account in this level comparison. The level of the user's own voice is considerably higher at the auditory channel microphone than in the case of a measurement using the external hearing aid microphones ME1, ME2 because the bone sound conduction is introduced directly into the closed auditory channel volume (occlusion effect). This level analysis should ideally relate to the frequency below 1 kHz, since the occlusion effect is at its greatest here.
The present invention can also be used for headsets and other mobile hearing apparatuses.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference has been made to the preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language has been used to describe these embodiments. However, no limitation of the scope of the invention is intended by this specific language, and the invention should be construed to encompass all embodiments that would normally occur to one of ordinary skill in the art.
The present invention may be described in terms of functional block components and various processing steps. Such functional blocks may be realized by any number of hardware and/or software components configured to perform the specified functions. For example, the present invention may employ various integrated circuit components, e.g., memory elements, processing elements, logic elements, look-up tables, and the like, which may carry out a variety of functions under the control of one or more microprocessors or other control devices. Similarly, where the elements of the present invention are implemented using software programming or software elements the invention may be implemented with any programming or scripting language with the various algorithms being implemented with any combination of data structures, objects, processes, routines or other programming elements. Furthermore, the present invention could employ any number of conventional techniques for electronics configuration, signal processing and/or control, data processing and the like.
The particular implementations shown and described herein are illustrative examples of the invention and are not intended to otherwise limit the scope of the invention in any way. For the sake of brevity, conventional electronics, control systems, software development and other functional aspects of the systems (and components of the individual operating components of the systems) may not be described in detail. Furthermore, the connecting lines, or connectors shown in the various FIGURES presented are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical or logical couplings between the various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships, physical connections or logical connections may be present in a practical device. Moreover, no item or component is essential to the practice of the invention unless the element is specifically described as “essential” or “critical”. Numerous modifications and adaptations will be readily apparent to those skilled in this art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 032 274 | Jul 2005 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4633498 | Warnke et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
6041129 | Adelman | Mar 2000 | A |
6526148 | Jourjine et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6728385 | Kvaløy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6937738 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7031484 | Ludvigen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20030012391 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030165246 | Kvaloy et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040202333 | Csermak et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050105750 | Frohlich et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 25 031 | May 1987 | DE |
103 32 119 | Dec 2004 | DE |
1 251 714 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 640 972 | Mar 2006 | EP |
54106106 | Aug 1979 | JP |
2003284194 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003304599 | Oct 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070009122 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |