Patent Application
20140321684
This invention relates to the field of hearing assistance devices, including personal sound amplification products (PSAPs) and hearing aids. More particularly, this invention relates to a system for operating a PSAP or hearing aid using a multipurpose control device.
Hearing loss varies widely from patient to patient in type and severity. As a result, the acoustical characteristics of a hearing aid must be selected to provide the best possible result for each hearing impaired person. Typically, these acoustical characteristics of a hearing aid are “fit” to a patient through a prescription procedure. Generally, this has involved measuring hearing characteristics of the patient and calculating the required amplification characteristics based on the measured hearing characteristics. The desired amplification characteristics are then programmed into a digital signal processor in the hearing aid, the hearing aid is worn by the patient, and the patient's hearing is again evaluated while the hearing aid is in use. Based on the results of the audiometric evaluation and/or the patient's comments regarding the improvement in hearing, or lack thereof, an audiologist or dispenser adjusts the programming of the hearing aid to improve the result for the patient.
As one would expect, the fitting procedure for a hearing aid is generally an interactive and iterative process, wherein an audiologist or dispenser adjusts the programming of the hearing aid, receives feedback from the patient, adjusts the programming again, and so forth, until the patient is satisfied with the result. In many cases, the patient must evaluate the hearing aid in various real world situations outside the audiologist's or dispenser's office, note its performance in those situations and then return to the audiologist or dispenser to adjust the hearing aid programming based on the audiologist's or dispenser's understanding of the patient's comments regarding the patient's experience with the hearing aid.
One of the significant factors in the price of a hearing aid is the cost of the audiologist's or dispenser's services in fitting and programming the device, along with the necessary equipment, such as software, computers, cables, interface boxes, etc. If the required participation of the audiologist and/or dispenser and the fitting equipment can be eliminated or at least significantly reduced, the cost of a hearing aid can be significantly reduced.
Some people, though not hearing impaired, from time to time need amplification of sounds in their environment for a number of reasons, such as while performing recreational activities. These people do not need a hearing aid that requires a “fitting” procedure performed by an audiologist. Rather, these people need a personal sound amplification product (PSAP). Although PSAPs have been available for many years, prior PSAP's have provided few options, if any, for selecting a gain-frequency response that is a good fit for the wearer's hearing situation.
What is needed, therefore, is a programmable hearing assistance device that does not require a fitting procedure conducted by an audiologist or dispenser. To obviate the necessity of the programming equipment and the necessity of an audiologist or dispenser fitting procedure, a programmable hearing assistance device is needed that can be automatically programmed based on selections made by a user while using the device.
Also needed is an easy-to-operate PSAP that allows a wearer to evaluate and choose a best-fit gain-frequency response.
The above and other needs are met by a hearing assistance device for enhancing hearing for a user. In a preferred embodiment, the device includes a housing configured to be worn in, on or behind an ear of the user. The housing contains one or more microphones, a memory, a processor, a single multipurpose control device, a digital-to-analog converter, an audio output section and a battery compartment door. The memory stores multiple amplification algorithms and multiple audio processing programs for use in processing digital audio signals. The processor uses the amplification algorithms while executing the audio processing programs to process the digital audio signals.
The multipurpose control device has only one up control and only one down control and operates in an algorithm selection mode and a daily use mode. In the algorithm selection mode, the user presses the up control or down control of the multipurpose control device to switch from one to another of the amplification algorithms, and to select one of the algorithms to be a preferred algorithm. In the daily use mode, the user presses the up control or down control of the multipurpose control device to adjust the volume of audible sound generated by an audio output section.
The battery compartment door holds a battery that powers the hearing assistance device. The battery compartment door has an open position in which the battery is removed from the device and the device is powered off, and a closed position in which the battery is inserted into the device and the device is powered on.
The single multipurpose control device and the battery compartment door are the only user-operable controls on the hearing assistance device for controlling the device and powering the device on or off. No other controls are needed for adjusting volume and switching between and selecting algorithms and programs.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method for controlling a hearing assistance device having a multipurpose control device. The method includes the following steps:
In some preferred embodiments, upon performance of step (e), the audio output section generates some number of audible tones or other sounds to identify the amplification algorithm in use.
In some preferred embodiments, upon performance of step (h), the audio output section generates an audible tone indicating that the preferred algorithm has been implemented for continued use.
In some preferred embodiments, the audio processing program implemented in step (h) is a quiet audio processing program configured for use in quiet acoustical environments, and the method further includes the following additional steps:
In some preferred embodiments, two microphones are used in conjunction with the noise audio processing program to provide an enhanced directional response for noisy environments, and only one microphone is used in conjunction with the quiet audio processing program to provide an omnidirectional response for quiet environments.
In some preferred embodiments, the audio output section generates an audible noise-like sound indicating that the noise audio processing program has been selected, a dial tone indicating that the telecoil audio processing program has been selected, and an audible tone indicating that the quiet audio processing program has been selected.
In some preferred embodiments, the method includes a reset procedure having the following steps:
Further advantages of the invention are apparent by reference to the detailed description in conjunction with the figures, wherein elements are not to scale so as to more clearly show the details, wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
In a preferred embodiment, the control device 32 comprises a digital rocker switch mounted on an outer surface of a housing 38 of the device 10. For example, the digital rocker switch 32 may be a model number MT90 Momentary Toggle Switch manufactured by Sonion. In some embodiments, the control device 32 comprises two individual push button switches disposed in a single rocker-style switch housing. Both of these control device configurations are referred to herein as a digital rocker switch and both include “up” and “down” controls 34a and 34b. The digital rocker switch 32 is also referred to herein as a multipurpose control device because it may be used as a volume control and as a control for switching between and selecting audio processing programs. As depicted in
The device 10 may be configured as a behind-the-ear (BTE) instrument, with the rocker switch 32 located on an accessible surface of the housing 38 of the BTE instrument as shown in
Nonvolatile memory 26, such as read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically erasable PROM (EEPROM), or flash memory, is provided for storing programming instructions and other operational parameters for the device 10. Preferably, the memory 26 is accessible by the processor 16 and/or the controller 28.
According to preferred embodiments of the invention, the personal sound amplification device 10 is operable in several different modes as determined by its programming. As the terms are used herein, “programs” and “programming” refers to one or more sets of instructions or parameters that are carried out or used by the processor 16 in shaping the frequency envelope of digital audio signals to enhance those signals to improve audibility for the wearer of the device 10. “Programs” and “programming” also refers to the instructions carried out by the processor 16 in determining which of several stored enhancement programs provides the best improvement for the wearer.
As used herein, a program is a set of instructions that implement an amplification algorithm for setting the audio frequency shaping or compensation provided in the processor 16. The amplification algorithms may also be referred to as “gain-frequency response” algorithms. Examples of generally accepted gain-frequency response algorithms include NAL (National Acoustic Laboratories; Bryne & Tonisson, 1976), Berger (Berger, Hagberg & Rane, 1977), POGO (Prescription of Gain and Output; McCandless & Lyregaard, 1983), NAL-R (NAL-Revised; Byrne & Dillon, 1986), POGO II (Schwartz, Lyregaard & Lundh, 1988), NAL-RP (NAL-Revised, Profound; Byrne, Parkinson & Newall, 1991), FIG6 (Killion & Fikret-Pasa, 1993) and NAL-NL1 (NAL nonlinear; Dillon, 1999). It will be appreciated that other algorithms could be used in association with the methods described herein, and the above list should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any way.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, a feedback canceller algorithm is also stored in the memory 26 of the device 10. An example of a feedback canceller algorithm is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2005/0047620 by Robert Fretz. As described in more detail below, such an algorithm is used to set the acoustical gain levels in the processor 16 and/or the amplifier 20 to avoid audio feedback in the device 10.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the rocker switch 32 is used to select preferred quiet environment programs during a setup procedure, to switch between a quiet environment program, noisy environment program and telecoil program during daily use, to control audio volume during daily use, and to reset the device 10.
As shown in
To cycle through the other available algorithms, the user taps the rocker switch up control 34a or down control 34b (step 104). As the term is used in describing preferred embodiments herein, a “tap” of the rocker switch is a press/hold of less than two seconds in duration.
When switching from one algorithm to the next, the audio output section 19 emits an auditory indicator of the active algorithm, such as some number of short pure-tone beeps indicating the number of the algorithm (step 108). The user can select the preferred one of the algorithms Q1-Q4 to be implemented in a quiet audio processing program (QS) by pressing and holding the rocker switch up control 34a or down control 34b for some extended time, such as ten seconds (step 110). At this point a long tone sounds to indicate to the user that the QS program is active (step 112).
Once the QS program is active, the non-selected algorithms are deactivated. In preferred embodiments, the non-selected algorithms are not erased, but are available for reactivation by resetting the device as described hereinafter.
In a preferred embodiment, when the QS program is selected, a single one of the microphones 12a-12b is used, thereby providing a substantially omnidirectional sound pattern that is optimal for relatively quiet conditions.
The processor 16 automatically activates a noisy environment condition program (NS) based on the QS program (step 114). When the NS program is selected, both of the microphones 12a-12b are used, thereby providing a more directional sound pattern that is optimal for relatively noisy conditions. In preferred embodiments, the shape of the gain/frequency response curve of the NS program is similar to that of the selected QS program. In some embodiments, the NS program has a reduced low-frequency response as compared to the QS program. The processor 16 also automatically selects a telecoil program TS based on the program QS.
Once the QS, NS and TS programs are active, the processor 16 enters a daily use mode (step 118). While in the daily use mode, the user can increase the audio volume by tapping the rocker switch up control 34a and decrease the audio volume by tapping the rocker switch down control 34b, with each tap increasing or decreasing the volume incrementally (step 122). The user can switch between the QS, NS and TS programs by pressing and holding the rocker switch up control 34a or down control 34b for about two seconds (step 124). When the QS program is selected, a pure-tone beep or other distinct sound is emitted from the audio output section 24 (step 126). When the NS program is selected, a noise sound (“shhh”) is emitted. When the TS program is selected, a dial-tone pulse is emitted.
To turn off the device 10, the user opens the battery compartment door 36 (step 128). To turn the device 10 back on, the user closes the battery compartment door 36 (step 116) as depicted by the arrow in
If a user wishes to select a different one of the amplification algorithms (Q1-Q4), the device 10 must be reset. To reset the device 10, the user opens the battery compartment door 36 with the battery in place (step 128), closes the battery compartment door while pressing the rocker switch (up or down button 34a-34b) for about 15 seconds (step 132), releases the rocker switch and opens the battery compartment door (step 134). When the device 10 is next powered on after a reset (step 100), the device 10 is in the algorithm selection mode (102).
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments for this invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments are chosen and described in an effort to provide the best illustrations of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/663,743 filed Oct. 30, 2012, entitled “Hearing Assistance Apparatus Having Single Multipurpose Control Device and Method of Operation,” which is continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. Pat. No. 8,396,237, entitled “Preprogrammed Hearing Assistance Device with Program Selection Using a Multipurpose Control Device,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13663743 | Oct 2012 | US |
| Child | 14322963 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12420477 | Apr 2009 | US |
| Child | 13663743 | US |
