The present refers to a hearing device according to the preamble of claim 1 and a process for the attachment of an external component to a hearing aid.
In practice, the present invention refers to a locking mechanism for the mechanical fixation of an external component, such as e.g. a receiver placed inside an ear canal, an acoustic sound tubing or the like to an externally worn hearing aid.
The requirement to such a mechanism is that it must be very small sized, ensure easy handling with no special tools needed and ensures secure attachment. Furthermore, it must ensure high freedom of exterior design of the hearing aid housing and connector, and that it cannot be lost during normal handling by the operator. The combination of all these aspects has so far not been realized with another interlocking means for attachment of external receivers or the like to hearing aids.
Current solutions for attachment of external receivers include simple through-hole pins, snap-on connection on housing or internal frame, locking by fixation spring, simple press-fit of plug in socket, bayonet coupling, locking by a further part such as a microphone protection means.
E.g. the U.S. 2007/0183612 describes a small pin which is inserted laterally and goes through aligned holes in the housing, and/or frame and external receiver plug. Although this solution features a very small size and a secure connection, the main disadvantage is that the pins, being so small, often get lost when the external receiver needs to be detached/attached. This is also a common complaint received from the field.
The U.S. Pat. No. D579,567 describes a snap-on connection on housing/frame. Attachment of external receiver by means of a click-fix mechanism also leads to a secure connection. The disadvantages are the comparably bigger size than other solutions, difficult handling (needs multiple force application in different directions at the same time) and a limitation in design freedom, if the external receiver is to be used with different hearing aids.
The WO2008095505A1 describes an interlocking fixation spring. Fixation of the plug in the socket by means of a flexible spring is a relatively space-saving solution. However, the disconnection force is crucial: if the retention force is too high, the external receiver is likely to get damaged (e.g. tubing will stretch over its elastic limit and litzwires are destroyed). If the force is lower to prevent said damage, there is a risk that the plug will be unintentionally removed from the socket, resulting in possible loss of the hearing aid. A dedicated locked/unlocked mechanism does not pose this risk.
The US20080095390A1 describes a bayonet coupling. A bayonet coupling is a secure fixation and handling is relatively simple. On the other hand, this solution is not ideal in terms of space-saving. It requires a more or less cylindrically shaped connector, which considerably limits freedom of design as well. Furthermore the size of this coupling cannot be too small, since the user should be able to operate the mechanism with his fingers.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a sealed solution for interlocking an external component to a hearing aid or hearing aid housing respectively.
The ideal interlocking mechanism for an external component such as receivers or the like to a hearing aid should offer the following features:
As a consequence, the present invention proposes a hearing aid according to the wording of claim 1.
The hearing aid comprising a locking mechanism for connecting an external component to the hearing aid is characterized in that the mechanism comprising a part arranged at or in the housing wall of the hearing aid, (pivotably) movable from or out of the housing wall such that by (pivotably) moving the part back towards the housing wall a section of the part is fixing a connecting element of the external component to the hearing aid or housing of the hearing aid respectively.
According to one embodiment the part of the locking mechanism is part of the housing wall.
According to a further embodiment the part of the locking mechanism is pivotably arranged around an axis within the housing and is connected to the housing by means of a pin, cam, pivot bolt, etc.
It is also possible to have a glued connection instead of a Pin, to use e.g. elastic characteristics of respective elastic materials suitable lobe used.
Furthermore, it is proposed that the locking mechanism comprising a latch-like part covering at least part of the housing wall in the area of the connecting element of the external component, which by the pivot movement of the latch-like part of the locking mechanism is fixing the connecting element by clamping, by squeezing, by snapping, etc.
The connecting element of the external component such as e.g. an external receiver placed e.g. inside the ear canal can be a plug-like element.
Further possible embodiments of the invention are described within the dependent claims.
The invention is further described by examples, shown in the attached figures.
In the figures:
The locking mechanism 2 has e.g. two defined positions. These positions are obtained by proximal movement of the locking mechanism 2 by applying proximal force/torque with any small enough tool to the channel 4 provided within a bent latch-like part 12 of the mechanism, overlapping the body end of the housing 1 in the area of receiving a plug of an external component. A specific tool is not necessarily required, open and close will work for example with fingernail. Instead of a channel of course e.g. a bulge or a small elevation could be provided.
As better recognized in
Referring now to
In
The locking mechanism 2 is preferably made of a polymeric material, such as e.g. a glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic resin or any stiff and hard enough polymer.
Material examples, not being exhaustive, include: polyamide (PA), polyoxymethylen (POM), polybutylenterephthalat (PBT), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), liquid crystalline polymers (LCP), etc.
The housing 1 is preferably made of a polymeric material as well. Any suitable thermoplastic resin can be used, either filled or unfilled with any kind of filler or reinforcement.
Alternatively, the locking mechanism 2 and/or the housing 1 can be made of a metal or a ceramic material.
Hence, possible combinations include:
The use of materials such as metal or ceramics exhibit several advantages, such as improved strength and wear characteristics, better environmental resistance, less extractable and better biocompatibility in contact with skin, higher-end appearance.
Metal and ceramic parts can be manufactured in different manners. One possibility is to make the parts in a powder injection molding process (PIM). This allows great freedom of design, complex shapes and relatively cost effective production.
Alternatively, such parts can also be made in other technologies, such as machining (metal and ceramic) or cold forming (metal).
Possible metal materials include Titanium, any stainless steel, in particular Nickel-free stainless steel, Aluminium, and any other metal material/alloy which fulfil the required mechanical properties and offer good resistance against acidic corrosion (not attacked by human sweat).
Possible ceramic materials include mainly ZrO2, Al2O3 and variants thereof (e.g. Y2O3 stabilized). Though, any other suitable ceramic material could be considered as well.
The designs as shown by examples in
E.g. the grooving 6 on the locking mechanism 2 along with the catch 5 are not absolutely necessary for the proper function of the invented locking mechanism. Alternatively, a friction based solution can be designed as well. In this case, the proximal movement of the locking mechanism 2 is only controlled by the amount of friction between the locking mechanism 2 and the housing 1.
The friction can be influenced by dimensional measures (i.e. less or more play), material selection (inherent coefficients of friction), surface treatment of any of the materials (will alter the coefficient of friction) and addition of further intermediate materials, such as lubricants (solid or liquid/paste-like).
Not all the aforementioned material combinations would work with the suggested grooving 6/catch 5 design.
Combinations not including at least one polymer material either for the housing or for the locking mechanism would require a friction-controlled design.
As another variation of this mechanism, the catching could be placed at a different place for example at the bottom side of the housing top or lateral.
Summarizing up the aforementioned information and the description, the advantages of the present invention are the following:
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/057094 | 5/4/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/1/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/149963 | 11/8/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
579567 | Earl | Mar 1897 | A |
5646598 | Nickles et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
8385573 | Higgins | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20070183612 | Ochsenbein et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080095390 | Gebert et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202 05 922 | Aug 2002 | DE |
0 087 668 | Sep 1983 | EP |
2008095505 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/EP2011/057094 dated Mar. 20, 2012. |
Written Opinion for for PCT/EP2011/057094 dated Mar. 20, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140079262 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |